If you dedicated nearly all your life time teaching a lie then obviously you want to keep contradictory evidence hidden. Especially when you school your kids in it. Just imagine being an Academic whose whole life work was considered inaccurate. Most of the enlightened Academia in history were isolated and called mad from their contemporaries, because the majority aren't interested in truth when their ego's are in jeopardy.
So , if I get a piece of stone (which is officially dated to be a million years old) and I carve out a rustic and worn arrow head - is some archeologist who finds it (where I planted it) going to examine it and determine that the arrow head is 1 million years old ?
@rolynstone48 Science would test the material composition date, in your example, the stone. They may even compliment your fine workmanship, but they'll be dating the material..
Damn YT idiots! Lots of arguing but f%#k all commenting on the video. Anyway, that tabletop mountain find is most certainly a fraud, but the Mexican one does seem rather intriguing. Wiki "Hueyatlaco"
wow, so reading some of these comments was pretty funny. The worst part about religious jackwagons is they don't think anyone could possibly have different beliefs than them and if they do they are wrong. No point in arguing with the simple minded, it just makes you dumber.
science is pretty simple, they only need one tiny bit of evidence that remotely connects to what they were looking for in order to validate their point..if 1000 things point to fact that smoking does not cause cancer and one thing loosly conects to the fact that it might, then the answer is smoking causes cancer.....
goin on that logic i bet my bottom dollar that breathing air causes cancer, cuz i can prove that all people who had and have cancer actually breath air...
Oh gosh of course we can't have archaeological finds that contradict the current theories presented in modern day education. That would mean the foundation and principles modern education is setting would be proven "WRONG"; thus, the men and women who set those principles and theories are full of crap. Let's laugh it off and only study things that support current theories and the bible that way we can control thinking patterns of society. It's called "selective knowledge".
@Animikiiasin please tell me how the bible is controlling any thinking patterns today? The world is as sinful as the time of Noah and Lot.... If anything the world is going fully AGAINST the bible. The bible is the only thing that stands true and the teachings of Christ written from old still stands and foretells the future. The Lord is coming soon.
@GodzzzSon How many versions of the bible are there? A new bible is released every time a nation is conquered produced by Christians. Look into history and see how many kings, religious groups and missionaries have bent their own faith and religion to fit their crimes. God did "NOT" send Christians out on a mission to convert the people of every nation they've conquered. Of course, anyone who speaks against the bible is a sinner. I believe in a god, not in a book.
@Animikiiasin Do you even know where the bible comes form? The bible comes from ancient manuscripts written by the prophets and scribes mentioned in the very same bible. They were copied over and over and translated to different languages. If you research the Dead Sea scrolls you will see that the Old Testament is the same as it was 100 years B.C ... The new testament has over 5 thousand greek manuscripts. The bible is not a joke, it's the Word of God. I believe in God over MAN.
@GodzzzSon I never said I didn't believe in god. I believe in god. I just don't believe in a book about god written by man. It's better to believe in god and follow the conscience he gave you then to follow a book written by men. Why does a man need a book when he can put his hands together and talk directly to god? I'll reply no more.
@Animikiiasin So you dont think that a God that can create all that is created is able to inspire man to write exactly what He wants them to? You don't have as much faith in your god that i do in mine.
@Moving2U Not a chance. There's far too much "flaw" in man. When men defeat their own conscience and become selfish, greedy, wasteful and deviant; moreover, having the ability to live in bliss with guilt no I don't think god would have man write the bible. God gave man gifts; the power to pray, dream and feel. God talks to every man more than he's willing to pay attention to. Why read mans words if god can talk directly to me? "Faith" your faith is weak.
@Animikiiasin So you are saying that God speaks to you about what is right and wrong. It is a safe bet that some hear better than others. It is safe to assume that God speaks much louder for a purpose to some than others. They wrote down the instruction to share and to glorify God.
If you wrote down what God told you and shared it with man, what difference would it be? "Oh that's just man's thoughts". The difference is you don't hear from God in quite the same way as prophets hear from God.
@Moving2U Yep I'm saying that. I'm also saying you were gifted with conscience, dream, prayer and intelligent thought and you're just as capable of the same communication.
@Moving2U That "book written by men" that you claim is garbage; The peoples places and times are historically verifyable. Prophesies written beforehand that have come true, What God speaks to His followers confirming the writings of "that book".
You have faith that a god can create the universe but no faith God can speak to man. But you have already claimed that God has spoken to you, but not to His prophets?
Make sure where the voices are coming from that you listen to.
@Moving2U You're suffering from fanaticism. Yes. I'm saying that book is garbage and believers in that book can't predict the future and haven't successfully predicted the future. They simply associate some event with a phrase after it happens in order to push the book and the religion.
@Moving2U Even more so you actually believe that man is some important part of the entire equation. This world has survived without man before and can survive without man when we're extinct. What makes you think that god actually needs a man at all to spread his word through a book? People use that book to do wrong anyway. If you learn through literature and movies you're learning nothing but a "man's" words and thoughts instead of establishing your own relationship.
@Animikiiasin Then I stand corrected, you are the only one that God speaks to. So what are you gonna do with that gift? Write a book to profit mankind?
@Animikiiasin Man is the point and pinacle of Gods creation or the equation. Man was created in the beginning right along with everything else. There is secular scientific proof that man walked with the dinosaurs. God doesn't need man but has declared that if man doesn't do it the very rocks will cry out. People use "good to do bad". Yup we all fall short of the glory of God. If we all establish own own way with God then there will be many gods. God established His way as there is only one God
@Moving2U That's just the written influence of man to glorify himself. My gosh you fanatical Christian I have an Idea! I will pray to god directly and keep an established formed relationship and you can pray to your bible, the man who wrote that bible, the man who thinks he has the authority to speak on gods behalf, the government or politicians or whoever you choose. You and your argument is insignificant and your book and culture are insignificant.
@Animikiiasin Nobody prays to a book. I am glad that you believe that there is a God, it's a step in the right direction. (Many people think we are a cosmic accident, you are blessed to recognise the difference).
Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; the one who abides in the teaching, he has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house, and do not give him a greeting.
@Moving2U Life is a gift and I'm not going to spend my gift arguing about a book that a man wrote. I'm not going to argue with you who actually believes that everything was created for you and your culture to abuse in the name of a book that a man wrote. Have yourself a great day. I don't believe the bible and don't believe that god needed a "man" to speak for him.
@Animikiiasin If you don't believe in the Bible then you don't believe in the one true God. It is odd that you believe there is a God but don't believe that He has any power.
Don't think that just because you live and think and breath and recognise that there must be a God that you are on good terms with Him. It is worth it (especially since you are on speaking terms with him) to ask Him if there is more than you are aware of that He requires of you in order to be saved from destruction.
@Moving2U Lucky for me I'm a Native American who practices tradition of respecting life and love the gifts of creation which were the first instructions the creator gave. At no point did I say the god had no power. I specifically made it clear that god did NOT need a man to speak or write for him/her. I lack no faith. I need no book. I don't over consume or waste much. I give thanks everyday not just Sunday. I definitely don't need a book pusher like you to KNOW of the creator:)
@Animikiiasin How do you know what the first instructions that the creator gave? Did someone who was there to witness it write it down in a book for man to see, so everyone else could critisize it and call it hogwash?
If you are a typucal native american then you do not believe in one god but many, along with the worship of some pretty evil stuff. But it is disguised as being in harmony with nature. What is natural and earthly is demonic. There are many voices out there, not just God's.
@Moving2U The first instructions were simple enough for a grandfather to tell his grandson. You're stereotyping Native Americans. There is one creator and all of the spirits that co-exist with us. We don't worship them. We respect them. Your one true god written in your book which "man" wrote is nothing more than control efforts by kings and writers to sway minds. It worked because you're truly brainwashed. You will say anything to defend a book. I can simply pray:)
@Moving2U So just keep putting money in that basket every Sunday and Wednesday and I'll continue to put my tobacco out every morning at sunrise with a small prayer thanking the creator for another day. Your religion can worship currency and follow the roman empire everywhere attempting to convert everyone but it won't be me I'm not a puppet to a book.
@Animikiiasin God spoke to His people 1000s of years before yours called North America your homland. It's not about religion it's about a relationship with the one true God. There are not many ways there is only one. Many people understand that there is a God but so do demons. You comparing the atrocities done "in the name" of Christianity is no more valid than me saying the atrocities done by your people mean none are honorable. Evil exists among every nation. Only one God can save man though.
@Moving2U Notice not once have I said the words "Do not believe in a god". See that's the difference. I can respect your god. I just can't respect a religion that pushes themselves onto other people everywhere they go leaving torn families and destruction in their path.
@Animikiiasin Don't make the mistake of thinking that all who claim to be Christians are. True Christians worship God daily, false Christians only do so on Sunday and their lives remain unchanged the rest of the week. You could not have possibly looked into the validity of the Judeo-Christian beliefs. Your typical rant is that men have changed it over time, added and removed to suit their purpose. The original transcripts all say the same thing and is what we study from today 4000 years later.
@Moving2U Guess what! I'm going to go to your profile and set you to ignore. I don't buy nothing you say. I'm going to then walk my children through the forest and teach them about respecting the Earth on the way to the sliding hill where I will spend quality time with yet another gift god gave me without the help of a "BOOK". Then, just maybe, I'll come home and make a fire and talk to my children about the first instructions the creator gave. "WITHOUT THE HELP OF A LYING BOOK!"
@Moving2U You want so badly to defend your precious book but you're not simply saying "okay. there's a god." and leave it at that. You're defending nothing but a book. I'll dog your book all day long but I won't dog your god. You don't know how to listen to god because you listen to a book. I forgot you're stripped from the real god and read a book instead.
@Moving2U The great thing about god is he can overcome the bad voices:) I'll never question god. I'll question books. I'll questions religion. I never claim to speak for god and I would not push my religion on you. You're frantically defending just a book. It's a BOOK that was written by a MAN!!! Just talk to god and be happy.
@Animikiiasin "The great thing about god is he can overcome the bad voices" Ask 10 of your friends who all hear something different which one of you is hearing from God and which 10 from Satan.
To be fair you must doubt everything you were told or taught by your ancestry because they are filthy lying men too (as in all men not just yours) only they didnt write a book.
What makes your fathers more noble or trustworthy than those that God chooses to speak through? Pride in heritage? Sorry.
@Animikiiasin And by the way, I'm not bashing Native Americans as I too hold that destiction. You played the "I'm a native amercan so I know better" card.
I am from the human race where we can all trace our lineage back through to one man and one woman. We are distant cousins no matter where we are born or to whom. You believe that there is one God and that is good. It is better to also know Him and know that you are His for eternity not just know about Him here on earth but end up perishing.
Some people here are asking why not date the objects themselves instead of the rock layer it was in, and how that makes no sense as it dates the rock and not the object. This makes perfect sense.
I'd like to point out that a lot of our current model of evolution is based on this precise method of dating.
So do you want to admit you don't know the age of Humanity, or do you want to admit you don't know the age of Humanity?
People are always afraid of what they don't understand. So they feel instead of sharing it with the world let's hide it. Then we get these movies that everybody thinks is just for entertainment when it's actual fact. Example's:National Treasure 1&2, Indiana Jones movies, Lora Croft Tomb Raider. Wake up people the governmen don't tell us everything, have you not noticed how in just a few short years the President's hair turns white that's not hair dye people it's serious stress and secrets.
Come on people, you don't only take under account the layers the found is under - you HAVE TO measure the actual age of the objects. Any miner could have brought those objects in there and dropped them there. Think about it, measure the actual objects and the truth comes out.
What the hell human come from south africa, 100k years? It had been recorded the are came to rest at the mt. Arafat. All human live in the land of nod. Nod mean they live all their own way.
how does dating the rock work? how can the dating tell when it was crafted? doesnt it just show how old the rock itself is? not when someone chipped it into a shape?
@CorporateRule They are not our "Gods" lol. Everythign that exists is already in existence. They didn't do anything but allow the manifestation of us to come into being from the Unmanifested, which is still an aspect of existence.
They did not create us, but rather manipulated energy to be able to allow our beingness to be expressed physically.
Has anyone ever thought the dating techniques themselves are rubbish? The atmosphere was not even the same before as it is now. What about cataclysm? Anyone ever thought how quick BIG things can happen?
@TheJamjam81 And your point is ? You obviously have very little knowledge of the dynamics involved in US politics and the fact that without a heavily armed population they would be well and truly on the ground with the jackboot of the Fourth Reich firmly ground into their skulls. Obviously you were fooled by Michael Moore's attack on the Second Amendment with that totally dishonest piece of journalism where he misrepresented himself in order to gain access to that dear old gentleman's home.
they are dating the components of the soil surrounding the spear point to be able to tell when the sedements were laid down... in this case the sedements surrounding the spear point were laid down 250kbp.... and since someone had to make the spear point before it could be buried in sedements, that someone had to be alive 250kbp give or take a few years.
@FreedomClause or it could have been placed in the wrong strata- someone digs a hole, perhaps digging up edible tubers for dinner, and loses their speartip. happens all the time- we call it an anachronism. and when all other evidence points to a later arrival date in the new world, we assume that anachronism is the most logical answer.
no argument there....just seemed keriscorp didn't know how the dating actually works....
your point is well taken as the most probable.....i would like to see the stratum personally....seems awful thin layers to be able to dig down 230k yrs.... but you never know....maybe it's the site of an old well...
@FreedomClause right- we can't radiometrically date stone tools (even if we use some element with a long half-life, we'd get the rock's formation, not it's conversion into a tool). I've heard of some stimulated flourescence technique, or something like that, which can tell us how long a stone tool has been buried- but I guess it's a new technique, so it wasn't used.
Why is Heston the only one who knows the "Truth." There is a lot we can't explain and I hope that some day we will, but if it comes from an actor and is bordered by other programs toting the "truth" about Atlantis, UFOs and life on Mars, I will reserve my right to take it with a grain of salt. I am a skeptic hoping for evidence to shake my world... I'm still looking.
Erm.. it kinda is. If radiometric dating is not accurate then you can explain to nuclear physicists how their reactors work. They use the same half-life equations
@WilsonAlmighty I cant answer that just that I hear allot argumetns about carbon dating not being accurate always - what do I know..Just stating what I read..
You shouldn't believe what you read. Look up radiometric dating. They use over a dozen different isotopes for different time periods because they have different half lives. These results are checked using tree rings and ice cores. Carbon dating is only used to obtain results for articles that are up to roughly 60,000 years old. Other methods such as Uranium-Lead are used for the billion year old time scale.
I'd google it if I were you, it's interesting stuff this nuclei decay
@WilsonAlmighty = wouldnt me looking up radiometric dating be reading though..LOL - JK...but i definitely will..the truth though - we will never know until someone from the outside world comes knocking down our door..
What u r hearing about greys and other creatures is government disinformation to reflect a power myth about America. Aliens are ancient indians that settled on mars and the moon, due to nuclear war & natural disasters. The civilization of india was over 1 million years old.Certain parts of india are still highly radioactive.They were highly spiritual and combined spirituality with technology to travel in Vimanas. Because of this religious and ethnic issue, there will be no disclosure by U.S.
It warms my heart every time I see whack-jobs & intolerant bigots of ALL STRIPES, whatever their personal justification may be, & no matter how fervently they want to kill each other, just put it all aside & band together to stem the tide of reality!
"BACK, blasphemous champions of logic and tolerance! The horrors of equality and open flow of information SHALL NOT BE SUFFERED TO EXIST, for only through DOGMA that the unclean may be excised!"
Am I the only one who thinks that guy looks and sounds like Charlton Heston? If you watch the whole movie, does he talk about damn, dirty apes? Perhaps an archaeologist found a blown up Statue of Liberty? You maniacs!!!
@sbadd - it is Charlton Heston. And yes I thought the same thing when I first heard of this programme many years ago - how ironic, in the ape films his character finds his civilisation in ruins and the planet run by symbolic-barbarians (by that i mean unevolved consciousness) - which is exactly how people like me feel in this world as it is today - the regime in charge denies eg atlantis existed despite all the ruins of a global civilisation...the idiots are in charge.
@sbadd - btw I'm going on this being = Forbidden Archaeology the Michael Cimino programme, if it's not that one then maybe it isn't Heston that it in it - I haven't watched this video.
@Babybeanzx - it's not that, there were always either records kept, or ancestral knowledge was of course extremely important and passed on orally - how else does anyone learn language and how to get food, make textiles and homes, know medicine.
Clearly something terrible happened - an ELE or invasion or timespace-meddling that fucked it all up - and to this day we have feeble minds at the helm. It makes no sense how some 'science' ignores the obvious - it points to deliberate liars.
Perhaps this is what the legend of Atlantis refers to.The story was merely an allegory pertaining to the facts which state we are much older than we think and that we fell from a golden age only to start over yet again.
(continued). But that's the price we have to be willing to pay for a 'true search' for knowledge. I'm not saying that the theories purported in the above post may not be true. But it maybe that there is just no sufficient proof for that yet. Many people also talk about so many of the advanced physics theories of today that don't have enough proof. Yes, there maybe no proof yet for some of these. But then scientists all over the world spend years trying to prove or disprove these.
Almost all of the scientific facts/theories we know of today were ones that overturned the prominent accepted theories of their time.It's Science that has always been willing to change,reject or accept anything provided there is sufficient proof to support them.As opposed to dogmatic beliefs and cultural myths that linger in people's minds without any evidence.It's true that in many cases the "sufficient" proof for a theory may come at a much later time than when it was originally proposed.
@Cupofwrathdotcom Geologists knew the earth was Millions of years old before Nuclear Chemists told them it was Billions of years old. All the dating methods cross check each other and have passed blind tests from different labs.
The mystery of pyramids, Easter Island stone statues, Stonehenge and other ancient structures have been already solved two years ago. You still do not know about it because World Media hide this information from people. These time capsules contain in their design knowledge about the Universe and super technologies (anti-gravity, free energy etc.) Evgeny Zhukov is the author of the book "The Road to Home" where you will find THE TRUTH!
@evgenyzhukov they havent been solved. there have been better theories put forth, but to say theyve been solved... god thats dumb. and evgeny zhukov is a lying fraud i did a panel with him once. if you knew most of his ideas, youd realize how stupid he is. he knows nothing of science in any field. (and hes in jail now anyways, for fraud- yeah- real good guy...)
Interesting video, but we can only assume that the dating they carried out was accurate. If we can dismiss modern science as flawed, then surely that philosophy should hold true with all scientific results ?
My point is that science is treated by some people a lot like religious beliefs are, i.e. they will pick and choose the parts that interests them and ignore the rest, that goes for the conspriacy theorists too.
It sucks most Scientist prefer to live in their "fantasy world" instead of learning about these objects and why they are like that. Scientist are always claiming, "we need proof ". Don't deny the facts in your hand stupid scientist, It's PHYSICAL PROOF ! Study it, or choose another job! Funny to think that even if a UFO were to land in front of them, scientists would still say, " Oh... that aint real".
@methos35bc It may take time to reestablish but not 60 million years. Maybe, and this is a BIG maybe, 3 million years for the dust to settle and life to move on but not 60 million +. I'm theorizing that "man" started some time around 30 million years ago and then destroyed himself/itself some 10 million years later. Now we are probably the second or possibly the 3rd "modern" man (or to exist on this planet. No doubt we won't be the last.
@methos35bc It may take time to reestablish but not 60 million years. Maybe, and this is a BIG maybe, 3 million years for the dust to settle and life to move on but not 60 million +. I'm theorizing that "man" started some time around 30 million years ago and then destroyed himseld/itself some 10 million years later. Now we are the second or possibly the 3rd "modern" man to exist on this planet. No doubt we won't be the last.
once popular theory gets a kink in it by new updated discoveries, in all science, it gets covered up because people do not like change in the status quo!
@chil0man I think you are right. Humans don't seem to fit into the Earth's nature. Other animals are far more in tune with the planet than humans. Humans are like a virus to the Earth.
@Truthforfreedom1 Not all humans. I can think of a few peoples who lived in absolute harmony with the earth...they have since been exterminated, overwhelmed or relegated to the status of 'inferior'.
Most people like living in LaLa land, with their contrived history. That tells them every thing is on the up swing. They sure as hell don't want any knowledge that would rock the boat, on the ultra calm sea of uniformitarianism and billions of years of slow change. Even unfolding catastrophes like "Fukusima" is swept under the rug of consciousness; in preference of news about "American Idol". OK, back to watching the "Simpson's"!
If you reject the claim that the stuff is as old as they say, millions of years, then you will understand how mankind is "older" than they thought. Not millions of years, nor billions, but everything is merely thousands of years old. That is the creationist viewpoint. This evidence that they found here rather supports the Bible instead, and the story of the Deluge in Noah's day.
Ok, I don't normally do this. EVER, But whilst doing my GCSE Sociology paper last week I found the most obvious, yet, descretely hidden Illuminati sign ever. Foreshadowing 9/11, made in 1998; so detailed and precise, yet still remaining hidden for 2 years of exams. People need to see it so can you come onto my channel + Like & Fav it? It would be much appreciated. And, i'm pretty sure you CAN'T flaw it. ZOMGAGDGFJG SB Its amazing, trust.
Well, if you got guts, you can stand against ruling dogma and win like Darwin did (he had doubts, be he finally made it) or just step aside and moan about coservative science community that doesn't love innovative and unexpected things (however this looks more like inability to show firm proof).
It's easy to get "older" age in dating process if sample has wear, so the data will be corrupt too adding ages to the real age.
@SwineNahNah You clearly didn't listen to a word the woman towards the end of the video said; archaeology doesn't age test physical/outward appearance of artifacts, it tests the frequency of elemental occurence and cohesion of molecular bonds that both comprise the material(s) artifacts are made of. So it wouldn't matter how worn or eroded an artifact may appear, as long as there's enough of the artifact present to be tested (doesn't even have to be in tact) age can be accurately measured.
The powers that be may in Fact have know our TRUE history!?..But..I don't think ANY of us REALLY have it down pat!?..I could NEVER buy into evolution "though I have a very scientific mind!"..I never really thought much of the Bible either!..I never had much understanding or desire on our TRUE history till I stumbled upon the "Ancient Astronaut" theory!...I HIGHLY suggest ANYONE that reads this PLEASE check this concept out!..Also please check out "Zecharia Sitchin" as well as the SUMERIANS!!
@dgenerated Sitchin is absolute nonsense. He changes the meanings of the Summerian words to man planets. THat not what they meant at all. And, if he was right, we would have seen the planet within the last 5,000 years, and we have not. Get your facts right at this website: w w w.exitmundi.nl/Planet-X.htm
let the human's ability to hide win.. we dont want the truth but a consensus truth... its the way it has been for centuries... stop bitchin about it... learn from america "truth is overrated"
after the global distruction (reset) the elite and the powers of illuminati will emerg from the ruins of man to fullfill there goal of reseeding the human sheep with there knowlage...thus becoming the ancient aliens of the past. fly to all lands to find and gather new sheep before the gas runs dry...give the knowlage to the next age of kings who hide behind man. resurch BRAVE NEW BOOKS and find your answers and conections. peace be upon you
Why would you use 'Uranium Decay' for supposedly human artifacts? That would be like use a tractor trailer scale house to measure childrens medicine dose? No mention of what Dr. Steen-McIntyre wrote in her report. I'm not against dates that would overturn the state of any science... but extra ordinary evidence would be necessary, and a better theory that embrace the old stuff in a better light is a priori in these cases. Firm on a conclusion without a sufficient chain of arguments is bad.
If we make stone tools out of 50 million year old stone then the the tool will be 50 million year old not 50000 yr old, and if we make tools out of 250 thousand year old stone then it will be 250,000 year old not 20,000, sorry for her work getting rejected, but a bit of commen sence would save her career, if in both those sites human remains where found to be 50 million years old or 250,000 years old then it is a discovery which is kept hidden, as just dead animals have 2% Carbon 14 in them.
This is covered up to safegaurd evolution theory. The real problem is with the rock layer dating system. Things are dated by what layer of rock theyre found in and the rocks are dated by what fossils are found in them. The fossils are dated by people guessing at the order they think animals evolved in. This stone tool could make people rethink how we date rock layers and thus also the fossils.
@fnatic9 Dating is largely validated with c14 decay tests. We know, very accurately, the decay rate of c14 and thus measuring what is found at a given level can establish a narrow date range.
Your facts are all muddled, sorry.
Dates are in no way determined by evolution, most dates were judged by historical references and anything outside of that was guess work until c14 testing helped solidify dates outside of about 6,000 years ago.
BTW, that is why original theories guessed on ~6000 years.
@looncraz c14 dating is not validated and its not accurate. Youre comparing the amount of c14 in a fossil with the amount in the atmosphere. Then measuring the decay to find the age. But its a fact c14 in the atmosphere is still increasing and has not yet reached equilibrium. So fossils have alot less c14 compared with today because there was less c14 back then, not because it has decayed so long.
They still use guess work to date fossils. Its a conspiracy against truth and against God.
@fnatic9 ~Way to be current with your "knowledge" C-14 is not accurate past 50,000 years and so IS NOT USED to date most fossils. Uranium-lead dating is accurate to 4.5 billion years, however. Try "The Periodic Table of the Elements" and compare half-lives of radioisotopes. Or, are you one of the creatards that says radioisotopes don't exist?
@pontecanis Uranium-lead dating is the same premice as C-14. The daughter element lead is found literally everywhere, so theres no way of knowing how much is from decay. All radiometric dating methods are flawed and unreliable. They do not disprove the bible or the existence of God to the contrary the creation of all things is proof of God, enough proof for you?
@fnatic9 ~Thanks for telling us all you have no clue about radioactive decay, which is well-known and occurs at a constant rate for each element. None of this has anything to do with the existence of god, by the way, although for those who think Bishop Ussher was correct and those who are biblical literalists, it is bad news, as it helps to show that Genesis is a series of myths rather than reality. See the videos Mathematic Disproof of YEC and Noah's Flood: mathematically disproven: do the math
Nice circular argument for the existence of god though...doesn't mean a damn thing as it is a fallacy...I could equally argue that the creation of all things is proof of the Flying Spagetti Monster, or Zeus, or that the creation of all things is proof of dill pickles. That the universe exists argues either that it is eternal and always has existed, or that it was created. Assuming it was created then begs the question: how did the creator get created? If it is eternal, no creator is required.
Even agreeing the postulation of a creator is correct, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to suggest in any way that this creator would be the biblical god---the creator could just as easily be the Flying Spagetti Monster, PBUH. Ramen to you.
could we really serve mankind- instead of digging sacred burials-& give back lands to african & landless usa mothers & children instead of overworking laborers & not paying mothers & so as to pay scientists- "it wd have made my career"-"progress" ? more like destruction & cruel heartlessness
there is an alterante view: that the dating of the strata is erroneous, that the rocks were laid during the flood of Noah so are recent, but either way orthodox theory is overturned
I think that the major deception of the age is that UFO are extraterrestial beings when in fact they migh wee be spiritual beings manifesting physiscaly to us. Most of the UFO encounters and video analis conclude at some point that they move and interact as if they dont have any mass at all.
Excuse me! the suppression of evidence, or the suppression of the truth, is not an automatic matter, and was desired by the "architect of the matrix", and benefited those who shut their mouth in order that have their money and lives in the matrix (they sold out on you). It might not have disturb you in your "rat race", but it was harmful to your spiritual awareness and growth. Now, "they" (those who sold out on you and the architects) trying to dig themselve out of the lynch coming their way...
give your selves to crom the one mighty and true god. the illumanti do not what us to know about gobekil tepe because it will proove the existed of conan who had die for our sins to crom.
alrite sure thats what they use to tell me at skool but like i said to my teacher."yu tell me blood carrys oxygen to my organs etc n then tell me its blue until i have a gash then oxygen gets to it n it turns red"?are yu sure?lool
@BRISTOL009 If you look at an open heart surgery you could probably see the blueish/ purplish vains gong to it as far as it turning red is do to the OVER SATURATION of oxygen.
@zuesblueblood missing link?? perhaps Luce is what you are looking for? You should try looking up some stuff one a web site called "talk origins.org".
Bizarre evidence no doubt because conspiracy theories are always bizarre. The evidence about the evolution of man is overwhelming and consistent. There are still gaps in the fossil record but the evidence from evolution of the human genome is very consistent with the fossil record.
the earth is only 6,000 years old lets get the facts going do not hear what the eluminati what you to hear the darwin way of life the next step to darwin is robotics my friends they are turning us into machings for the new world order.
@lovesack you will burn in hell for not worshipping corn the one true god and his son the mightly conan, you will no doudt froze in Hel the icly rleam while i will go up yp vanhaller and fovere drink bear and feast with the mightly conan
what a crock of BS.Scientists thrive on true controversy, it is the lifeblood of what they do.The 'opinion' that scientists reject things that dont fit an excepted model obviously comes from the faulty logic of the creationists that made this video.
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Genesis 6:3-5
We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.”
i believe our species has developed on this earth millions of years before our accepted dates and theories what is interesting is the rise in organized religeon in our early history from maybee 15,000 years ago and alot of the evidence points to extraterestrial interference. And as far as im concerned that is a bad thing, worship, slavery and then the disapearence of these civilisation with no good reason. Maybee the tearm it has happened and will happen again is a very real and scary thought..
The oldest pottery on record is 19ooo yrs old. For me pottery is a good bench mark of the truly modern human. The women mentions the figure of 20 thousand yrs old as the expected age for a really old site. If the dating is correct it really isolates this site vis-a-vis the rest of the planet. It seems more likely that there was a problem with the dating.
also, in New Mexico human hand prints where found in volcanic ash 65 million years old. All I can think of is that time travel really exists at least in the future, or perhaps we really did exist 65 million years ago. Open minds are needed here.
good vid.
MACeeKings 6 hours ago
The history books are all a lie.
TheStartrekkid 13 hours ago
If you dedicated nearly all your life time teaching a lie then obviously you want to keep contradictory evidence hidden. Especially when you school your kids in it. Just imagine being an Academic whose whole life work was considered inaccurate. Most of the enlightened Academia in history were isolated and called mad from their contemporaries, because the majority aren't interested in truth when their ego's are in jeopardy.
hrep14 6 days ago
Who is the knowledged-but nerdy fruitcake at 5:22? Who do you think controls information,
history, universities? Think about i, who has the power ergo, influence to control academia?
It's a incestuous group of people at a moderately large round table, in a smoke filled room.
Is this really beyond your vast IQ?
djoh0000 1 week ago
So , if I get a piece of stone (which is officially dated to be a million years old) and I carve out a rustic and worn arrow head - is some archeologist who finds it (where I planted it) going to examine it and determine that the arrow head is 1 million years old ?
rolynstone48 1 week ago
@rolynstone48 Science would test the material composition date, in your example, the stone. They may even compliment your fine workmanship, but they'll be dating the material..
djoh0000 1 week ago
do you think that because of doom predictions from Nostradamus and the bible that we are subconsciously dooming our selves?
GLoBeTree1 1 week ago
fuck off with all the religeous crap
barone04 1 week ago
Damn YT idiots! Lots of arguing but f%#k all commenting on the video. Anyway, that tabletop mountain find is most certainly a fraud, but the Mexican one does seem rather intriguing. Wiki "Hueyatlaco"
mikeab71 1 week ago
wow, so reading some of these comments was pretty funny. The worst part about religious jackwagons is they don't think anyone could possibly have different beliefs than them and if they do they are wrong. No point in arguing with the simple minded, it just makes you dumber.
Herit3ch 2 weeks ago
drinking water is the gateway to drug related crime....
HOMEnHIGH 3 weeks ago
@HOMEnHIGH this is true lol before drinking beer im sure they had soda, before soda im sure they had juice before juice was milk and water :)
brentpal 1 week ago
science is pretty simple, they only need one tiny bit of evidence that remotely connects to what they were looking for in order to validate their point..if 1000 things point to fact that smoking does not cause cancer and one thing loosly conects to the fact that it might, then the answer is smoking causes cancer.....
goin on that logic i bet my bottom dollar that breathing air causes cancer, cuz i can prove that all people who had and have cancer actually breath air...
HOMEnHIGH 3 weeks ago
Modern science isn't science, it is religion and nothing is allowed to challenge the doctrine.
bryonlape 3 weeks ago
i think the biggest case for intelligent life elsewhere is that it has not tried to contact us. that is intelligence.
chaosprune 3 weeks ago
Oh gosh of course we can't have archaeological finds that contradict the current theories presented in modern day education. That would mean the foundation and principles modern education is setting would be proven "WRONG"; thus, the men and women who set those principles and theories are full of crap. Let's laugh it off and only study things that support current theories and the bible that way we can control thinking patterns of society. It's called "selective knowledge".
Animikiiasin 1 month ago
@Animikiiasin please tell me how the bible is controlling any thinking patterns today? The world is as sinful as the time of Noah and Lot.... If anything the world is going fully AGAINST the bible. The bible is the only thing that stands true and the teachings of Christ written from old still stands and foretells the future. The Lord is coming soon.
GodzzzSon 1 month ago
@GodzzzSon How many versions of the bible are there? A new bible is released every time a nation is conquered produced by Christians. Look into history and see how many kings, religious groups and missionaries have bent their own faith and religion to fit their crimes. God did "NOT" send Christians out on a mission to convert the people of every nation they've conquered. Of course, anyone who speaks against the bible is a sinner. I believe in a god, not in a book.
Animikiiasin 1 month ago
@Animikiiasin Do you even know where the bible comes form? The bible comes from ancient manuscripts written by the prophets and scribes mentioned in the very same bible. They were copied over and over and translated to different languages. If you research the Dead Sea scrolls you will see that the Old Testament is the same as it was 100 years B.C ... The new testament has over 5 thousand greek manuscripts. The bible is not a joke, it's the Word of God. I believe in God over MAN.
GodzzzSon 1 month ago
@GodzzzSon I never said I didn't believe in god. I believe in god. I just don't believe in a book about god written by man. It's better to believe in god and follow the conscience he gave you then to follow a book written by men. Why does a man need a book when he can put his hands together and talk directly to god? I'll reply no more.
Animikiiasin 1 month ago
@Animikiiasin So you dont think that a God that can create all that is created is able to inspire man to write exactly what He wants them to? You don't have as much faith in your god that i do in mine.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U Not a chance. There's far too much "flaw" in man. When men defeat their own conscience and become selfish, greedy, wasteful and deviant; moreover, having the ability to live in bliss with guilt no I don't think god would have man write the bible. God gave man gifts; the power to pray, dream and feel. God talks to every man more than he's willing to pay attention to. Why read mans words if god can talk directly to me? "Faith" your faith is weak.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin So you are saying that God speaks to you about what is right and wrong. It is a safe bet that some hear better than others. It is safe to assume that God speaks much louder for a purpose to some than others. They wrote down the instruction to share and to glorify God.
If you wrote down what God told you and shared it with man, what difference would it be? "Oh that's just man's thoughts". The difference is you don't hear from God in quite the same way as prophets hear from God.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U Yep I'm saying that. I'm also saying you were gifted with conscience, dream, prayer and intelligent thought and you're just as capable of the same communication.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U That "book written by men" that you claim is garbage; The peoples places and times are historically verifyable. Prophesies written beforehand that have come true, What God speaks to His followers confirming the writings of "that book".
You have faith that a god can create the universe but no faith God can speak to man. But you have already claimed that God has spoken to you, but not to His prophets?
Make sure where the voices are coming from that you listen to.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U You're suffering from fanaticism. Yes. I'm saying that book is garbage and believers in that book can't predict the future and haven't successfully predicted the future. They simply associate some event with a phrase after it happens in order to push the book and the religion.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U Even more so you actually believe that man is some important part of the entire equation. This world has survived without man before and can survive without man when we're extinct. What makes you think that god actually needs a man at all to spread his word through a book? People use that book to do wrong anyway. If you learn through literature and movies you're learning nothing but a "man's" words and thoughts instead of establishing your own relationship.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin Then I stand corrected, you are the only one that God speaks to. So what are you gonna do with that gift? Write a book to profit mankind?
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin Man is the point and pinacle of Gods creation or the equation. Man was created in the beginning right along with everything else. There is secular scientific proof that man walked with the dinosaurs. God doesn't need man but has declared that if man doesn't do it the very rocks will cry out. People use "good to do bad". Yup we all fall short of the glory of God. If we all establish own own way with God then there will be many gods. God established His way as there is only one God
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U That's just the written influence of man to glorify himself. My gosh you fanatical Christian I have an Idea! I will pray to god directly and keep an established formed relationship and you can pray to your bible, the man who wrote that bible, the man who thinks he has the authority to speak on gods behalf, the government or politicians or whoever you choose. You and your argument is insignificant and your book and culture are insignificant.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin Nobody prays to a book. I am glad that you believe that there is a God, it's a step in the right direction. (Many people think we are a cosmic accident, you are blessed to recognise the difference).
Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; the one who abides in the teaching, he has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house, and do not give him a greeting.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U Life is a gift and I'm not going to spend my gift arguing about a book that a man wrote. I'm not going to argue with you who actually believes that everything was created for you and your culture to abuse in the name of a book that a man wrote. Have yourself a great day. I don't believe the bible and don't believe that god needed a "man" to speak for him.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin If you don't believe in the Bible then you don't believe in the one true God. It is odd that you believe there is a God but don't believe that He has any power.
Don't think that just because you live and think and breath and recognise that there must be a God that you are on good terms with Him. It is worth it (especially since you are on speaking terms with him) to ask Him if there is more than you are aware of that He requires of you in order to be saved from destruction.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U Lucky for me I'm a Native American who practices tradition of respecting life and love the gifts of creation which were the first instructions the creator gave. At no point did I say the god had no power. I specifically made it clear that god did NOT need a man to speak or write for him/her. I lack no faith. I need no book. I don't over consume or waste much. I give thanks everyday not just Sunday. I definitely don't need a book pusher like you to KNOW of the creator:)
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin How do you know what the first instructions that the creator gave? Did someone who was there to witness it write it down in a book for man to see, so everyone else could critisize it and call it hogwash?
If you are a typucal native american then you do not believe in one god but many, along with the worship of some pretty evil stuff. But it is disguised as being in harmony with nature. What is natural and earthly is demonic. There are many voices out there, not just God's.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U The first instructions were simple enough for a grandfather to tell his grandson. You're stereotyping Native Americans. There is one creator and all of the spirits that co-exist with us. We don't worship them. We respect them. Your one true god written in your book which "man" wrote is nothing more than control efforts by kings and writers to sway minds. It worked because you're truly brainwashed. You will say anything to defend a book. I can simply pray:)
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U So just keep putting money in that basket every Sunday and Wednesday and I'll continue to put my tobacco out every morning at sunrise with a small prayer thanking the creator for another day. Your religion can worship currency and follow the roman empire everywhere attempting to convert everyone but it won't be me I'm not a puppet to a book.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin God spoke to His people 1000s of years before yours called North America your homland. It's not about religion it's about a relationship with the one true God. There are not many ways there is only one. Many people understand that there is a God but so do demons. You comparing the atrocities done "in the name" of Christianity is no more valid than me saying the atrocities done by your people mean none are honorable. Evil exists among every nation. Only one God can save man though.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U Notice not once have I said the words "Do not believe in a god". See that's the difference. I can respect your god. I just can't respect a religion that pushes themselves onto other people everywhere they go leaving torn families and destruction in their path.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin Don't make the mistake of thinking that all who claim to be Christians are. True Christians worship God daily, false Christians only do so on Sunday and their lives remain unchanged the rest of the week. You could not have possibly looked into the validity of the Judeo-Christian beliefs. Your typical rant is that men have changed it over time, added and removed to suit their purpose. The original transcripts all say the same thing and is what we study from today 4000 years later.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U Guess what! I'm going to go to your profile and set you to ignore. I don't buy nothing you say. I'm going to then walk my children through the forest and teach them about respecting the Earth on the way to the sliding hill where I will spend quality time with yet another gift god gave me without the help of a "BOOK". Then, just maybe, I'll come home and make a fire and talk to my children about the first instructions the creator gave. "WITHOUT THE HELP OF A LYING BOOK!"
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U You want so badly to defend your precious book but you're not simply saying "okay. there's a god." and leave it at that. You're defending nothing but a book. I'll dog your book all day long but I won't dog your god. You don't know how to listen to god because you listen to a book. I forgot you're stripped from the real god and read a book instead.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Moving2U The great thing about god is he can overcome the bad voices:) I'll never question god. I'll question books. I'll questions religion. I never claim to speak for god and I would not push my religion on you. You're frantically defending just a book. It's a BOOK that was written by a MAN!!! Just talk to god and be happy.
Animikiiasin 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin "The great thing about god is he can overcome the bad voices" Ask 10 of your friends who all hear something different which one of you is hearing from God and which 10 from Satan.
To be fair you must doubt everything you were told or taught by your ancestry because they are filthy lying men too (as in all men not just yours) only they didnt write a book.
What makes your fathers more noble or trustworthy than those that God chooses to speak through? Pride in heritage? Sorry.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
@Animikiiasin And by the way, I'm not bashing Native Americans as I too hold that destiction. You played the "I'm a native amercan so I know better" card.
I am from the human race where we can all trace our lineage back through to one man and one woman. We are distant cousins no matter where we are born or to whom. You believe that there is one God and that is good. It is better to also know Him and know that you are His for eternity not just know about Him here on earth but end up perishing.
Moving2U 3 weeks ago
Some people here are asking why not date the objects themselves instead of the rock layer it was in, and how that makes no sense as it dates the rock and not the object. This makes perfect sense.
I'd like to point out that a lot of our current model of evolution is based on this precise method of dating.
So do you want to admit you don't know the age of Humanity, or do you want to admit you don't know the age of Humanity?
LordShivasServant 1 month ago
People are always afraid of what they don't understand. So they feel instead of sharing it with the world let's hide it. Then we get these movies that everybody thinks is just for entertainment when it's actual fact. Example's:National Treasure 1&2, Indiana Jones movies, Lora Croft Tomb Raider. Wake up people the governmen don't tell us everything, have you not noticed how in just a few short years the President's hair turns white that's not hair dye people it's serious stress and secrets.
mzrena1023 1 month ago
@mzrena1023 maybe people esp white people don't want people to be scared.
MsMichelle103 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLOOD MOONS 2014 2015 plz watch that video and spread that info to everyone. JESUS IS COMING SOON!
acerv36 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLOOD MOONS 2014 2015 plz watch that video and spread that info to everyone. JESUS IS COMING SOON!
acerv36 2 months ago
Come on people, you don't only take under account the layers the found is under - you HAVE TO measure the actual age of the objects. Any miner could have brought those objects in there and dropped them there. Think about it, measure the actual objects and the truth comes out.
ronmacenn 3 months ago
Ark
Cougman1978 3 months ago
What the hell human come from south africa, 100k years? It had been recorded the are came to rest at the mt. Arafat. All human live in the land of nod. Nod mean they live all their own way.
Cougman1978 3 months ago
hhahahhahaa, this is funny.... oh wait there's people taking this seriously?
eggius 3 months ago
how does dating the rock work? how can the dating tell when it was crafted? doesnt it just show how old the rock itself is? not when someone chipped it into a shape?
jrspringston 4 months ago
UFO space aliens created mankind, you are to worship only the grey aliens who are your Gods.
CorporateRule 4 months ago
@CorporateRule They are not our "Gods" lol. Everythign that exists is already in existence. They didn't do anything but allow the manifestation of us to come into being from the Unmanifested, which is still an aspect of existence.
They did not create us, but rather manipulated energy to be able to allow our beingness to be expressed physically.
MrGravityDance 4 months ago
@CorporateRule Lol you are retarded!
Fuck grey aliens and UFO
If they even exist they are probably inferior to mankind!
AskariWaryaa 3 months ago
Has anyone ever thought the dating techniques themselves are rubbish? The atmosphere was not even the same before as it is now. What about cataclysm? Anyone ever thought how quick BIG things can happen?
Proteched 4 months ago
great video hosted by chairman or member of the n.r.a ?????
TheJamjam81 5 months ago
@TheJamjam81 And your point is ? You obviously have very little knowledge of the dynamics involved in US politics and the fact that without a heavily armed population they would be well and truly on the ground with the jackboot of the Fourth Reich firmly ground into their skulls. Obviously you were fooled by Michael Moore's attack on the Second Amendment with that totally dishonest piece of journalism where he misrepresented himself in order to gain access to that dear old gentleman's home.
TelecasterLPGTop 4 months ago
so....at some point in time, a spear point was made from a rock thats now about 250,000 years old....the rock....so....when was the spear point made?
am i missing something here? this sounds like skewed logic, to me....
if she floats, shes made of wood, so shes a witch....
keriscorp 5 months ago
@keriscorp
they are dating the components of the soil surrounding the spear point to be able to tell when the sedements were laid down... in this case the sedements surrounding the spear point were laid down 250kbp.... and since someone had to make the spear point before it could be buried in sedements, that someone had to be alive 250kbp give or take a few years.
FreedomClause 5 months ago
@FreedomClause or it could have been placed in the wrong strata- someone digs a hole, perhaps digging up edible tubers for dinner, and loses their speartip. happens all the time- we call it an anachronism. and when all other evidence points to a later arrival date in the new world, we assume that anachronism is the most logical answer.
1h34rtmus1c 5 months ago
@1h34rtmus1c
no argument there....just seemed keriscorp didn't know how the dating actually works....
your point is well taken as the most probable.....i would like to see the stratum personally....seems awful thin layers to be able to dig down 230k yrs.... but you never know....maybe it's the site of an old well...
FreedomClause 5 months ago
@FreedomClause right- we can't radiometrically date stone tools (even if we use some element with a long half-life, we'd get the rock's formation, not it's conversion into a tool). I've heard of some stimulated flourescence technique, or something like that, which can tell us how long a stone tool has been buried- but I guess it's a new technique, so it wasn't used.
1h34rtmus1c 4 months ago
@keriscorp It's such an obvious point, isn't it. The rock no doubt spent most of its existence as a rock, not a tool. Duh.
Pinage 4 months ago
Why is Heston the only one who knows the "Truth." There is a lot we can't explain and I hope that some day we will, but if it comes from an actor and is bordered by other programs toting the "truth" about Atlantis, UFOs and life on Mars, I will reserve my right to take it with a grain of salt. I am a skeptic hoping for evidence to shake my world... I'm still looking.
otherjay11 5 months ago
I have a hard time believing in carbon dating...
rhdtv2002 6 months ago
@rhdtv2002 why??
HONORGUARD308 6 months ago
@HONORGUARD308 because it can be all over the map..its not really that accurate
rhdtv2002 6 months ago
@rhdtv2002
Erm.. it kinda is. If radiometric dating is not accurate then you can explain to nuclear physicists how their reactors work. They use the same half-life equations
WilsonAlmighty 6 months ago
@WilsonAlmighty I cant answer that just that I hear allot argumetns about carbon dating not being accurate always - what do I know..Just stating what I read..
rhdtv2002 6 months ago
@rhdtv2002
You shouldn't believe what you read. Look up radiometric dating. They use over a dozen different isotopes for different time periods because they have different half lives. These results are checked using tree rings and ice cores. Carbon dating is only used to obtain results for articles that are up to roughly 60,000 years old. Other methods such as Uranium-Lead are used for the billion year old time scale.
I'd google it if I were you, it's interesting stuff this nuclei decay
WilsonAlmighty 6 months ago
@WilsonAlmighty = wouldnt me looking up radiometric dating be reading though..LOL - JK...but i definitely will..the truth though - we will never know until someone from the outside world comes knocking down our door..
rhdtv2002 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What u r hearing about greys and other creatures is government disinformation to reflect a power myth about America. Aliens are ancient indians that settled on mars and the moon, due to nuclear war & natural disasters. The civilization of india was over 1 million years old.Certain parts of india are still highly radioactive.They were highly spiritual and combined spirituality with technology to travel in Vimanas. Because of this religious and ethnic issue, there will be no disclosure by U.S.
brucaX10 6 months ago
It warms my heart every time I see whack-jobs & intolerant bigots of ALL STRIPES, whatever their personal justification may be, & no matter how fervently they want to kill each other, just put it all aside & band together to stem the tide of reality!
"BACK, blasphemous champions of logic and tolerance! The horrors of equality and open flow of information SHALL NOT BE SUFFERED TO EXIST, for only through DOGMA that the unclean may be excised!"
You TELL 'EM, MOSES!!!
matThaHatter 6 months ago
Am I the only one who thinks that guy looks and sounds like Charlton Heston? If you watch the whole movie, does he talk about damn, dirty apes? Perhaps an archaeologist found a blown up Statue of Liberty? You maniacs!!!
sbadd 6 months ago
@sbadd - it is Charlton Heston. And yes I thought the same thing when I first heard of this programme many years ago - how ironic, in the ape films his character finds his civilisation in ruins and the planet run by symbolic-barbarians (by that i mean unevolved consciousness) - which is exactly how people like me feel in this world as it is today - the regime in charge denies eg atlantis existed despite all the ruins of a global civilisation...the idiots are in charge.
MannySteinerBIeeky 6 months ago
@sbadd - btw I'm going on this being = Forbidden Archaeology the Michael Cimino programme, if it's not that one then maybe it isn't Heston that it in it - I haven't watched this video.
MannySteinerBIeeky 6 months ago
Very true. Science has not progressed much since the doctrine of Evolution became the paradigm to which all must bow.
earlysda 6 months ago
we couldnt figure out where we came from so we just made it up ourselves :) lmfao
Babybeanzx 6 months ago
@Babybeanzx - it's not that, there were always either records kept, or ancestral knowledge was of course extremely important and passed on orally - how else does anyone learn language and how to get food, make textiles and homes, know medicine.
Clearly something terrible happened - an ELE or invasion or timespace-meddling that fucked it all up - and to this day we have feeble minds at the helm. It makes no sense how some 'science' ignores the obvious - it points to deliberate liars.
MannySteinerBIeeky 6 months ago
Perhaps this is what the legend of Atlantis refers to.The story was merely an allegory pertaining to the facts which state we are much older than we think and that we fell from a golden age only to start over yet again.
PrAeToRiAOnE3 6 months ago
250,000yearsold!!!!!
ThePrettyfreaky 6 months ago
(continued). But that's the price we have to be willing to pay for a 'true search' for knowledge. I'm not saying that the theories purported in the above post may not be true. But it maybe that there is just no sufficient proof for that yet. Many people also talk about so many of the advanced physics theories of today that don't have enough proof. Yes, there maybe no proof yet for some of these. But then scientists all over the world spend years trying to prove or disprove these.
rajjuvin 6 months ago
Almost all of the scientific facts/theories we know of today were ones that overturned the prominent accepted theories of their time.It's Science that has always been willing to change,reject or accept anything provided there is sufficient proof to support them.As opposed to dogmatic beliefs and cultural myths that linger in people's minds without any evidence.It's true that in many cases the "sufficient" proof for a theory may come at a much later time than when it was originally proposed.
rajjuvin 6 months ago
The most obvious explanation is that radiometric dating is unreliable at best
Cupofwrathdotcom 6 months ago
@Cupofwrathdotcom Geologists knew the earth was Millions of years old before Nuclear Chemists told them it was Billions of years old. All the dating methods cross check each other and have passed blind tests from different labs.
gregrutz 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 6 months ago
The mystery of pyramids, Easter Island stone statues, Stonehenge and other ancient structures have been already solved two years ago. You still do not know about it because World Media hide this information from people. These time capsules contain in their design knowledge about the Universe and super technologies (anti-gravity, free energy etc.) Evgeny Zhukov is the author of the book "The Road to Home" where you will find THE TRUTH!
evgenyzhukov 7 months ago
@evgenyzhukov they havent been solved. there have been better theories put forth, but to say theyve been solved... god thats dumb. and evgeny zhukov is a lying fraud i did a panel with him once. if you knew most of his ideas, youd realize how stupid he is. he knows nothing of science in any field. (and hes in jail now anyways, for fraud- yeah- real good guy...)
guineapiggyman 6 months ago
@guineapiggyman Are you joking? Am I in jail?
evgenyzhukov 6 months ago
@evgenyzhukov i dont know who you are, but i really dont care
guineapiggyman 6 months ago
So basically, science is just like religion.. it closes it's eyes and ears off to what it doesn't want to believe to be true
DopoNotte 7 months ago
Interesting video, but we can only assume that the dating they carried out was accurate. If we can dismiss modern science as flawed, then surely that philosophy should hold true with all scientific results ?
My point is that science is treated by some people a lot like religious beliefs are, i.e. they will pick and choose the parts that interests them and ignore the rest, that goes for the conspriacy theorists too.
proteoid 7 months ago
History is something we can only speculate about.
You never really know how (wild)life was during that time.
An (maybe somewhat extreme) example:
Over 200 years our decendents will dig up a parking garage and will think it where sleeping places for slaves.
stemom 8 months ago
It sucks most Scientist prefer to live in their "fantasy world" instead of learning about these objects and why they are like that. Scientist are always claiming, "we need proof ". Don't deny the facts in your hand stupid scientist, It's PHYSICAL PROOF ! Study it, or choose another job! Funny to think that even if a UFO were to land in front of them, scientists would still say, " Oh... that aint real".
johnnyray1717 8 months ago
uh oh just seen Charlton Heston talking about archaeology??????? XD
Starbluebolt 8 months ago
@methos35bc It may take time to reestablish but not 60 million years. Maybe, and this is a BIG maybe, 3 million years for the dust to settle and life to move on but not 60 million +. I'm theorizing that "man" started some time around 30 million years ago and then destroyed himself/itself some 10 million years later. Now we are probably the second or possibly the 3rd "modern" man (or to exist on this planet. No doubt we won't be the last.
methos35bc 8 months ago
@methos35bc It may take time to reestablish but not 60 million years. Maybe, and this is a BIG maybe, 3 million years for the dust to settle and life to move on but not 60 million +. I'm theorizing that "man" started some time around 30 million years ago and then destroyed himseld/itself some 10 million years later. Now we are the second or possibly the 3rd "modern" man to exist on this planet. No doubt we won't be the last.
methos35bc 8 months ago
once popular theory gets a kink in it by new updated discoveries, in all science, it gets covered up because people do not like change in the status quo!
anjilyn2 8 months ago
we are not form this planet..and i dont give a shit what you may think
chil0man 8 months ago
@chil0man I think you are right. Humans don't seem to fit into the Earth's nature. Other animals are far more in tune with the planet than humans. Humans are like a virus to the Earth.
Truthforfreedom1 8 months ago
@Truthforfreedom1 True, if it weren't for chimps, whom we behave very similarly to.
proteoid 7 months ago
@Truthforfreedom1 Not all humans. I can think of a few peoples who lived in absolute harmony with the earth...they have since been exterminated, overwhelmed or relegated to the status of 'inferior'.
hisnameisfrankie 7 months ago
@Truthforfreedom1 You're a fool and i resent you calling me a virus.
ladyjanerochford1505 7 months ago
@ladyjanerochford1505 your an idiot. hes right, if you think about it for even a sec
guineapiggyman 6 months ago
science indicates what we dont know now is to be catagorized , and sorted until theres more data to associate within it
i find science never wrong for the fact its ,,ecclectic
most flowing word used
all encompassing data accumilation
ANCESTERSMEMORIES 8 months ago
Most people like living in LaLa land, with their contrived history. That tells them every thing is on the up swing. They sure as hell don't want any knowledge that would rock the boat, on the ultra calm sea of uniformitarianism and billions of years of slow change. Even unfolding catastrophes like "Fukusima" is swept under the rug of consciousness; in preference of news about "American Idol". OK, back to watching the "Simpson's"!
Howie47 8 months ago
If you reject the claim that the stuff is as old as they say, millions of years, then you will understand how mankind is "older" than they thought. Not millions of years, nor billions, but everything is merely thousands of years old. That is the creationist viewpoint. This evidence that they found here rather supports the Bible instead, and the story of the Deluge in Noah's day.
darkentrie 8 months ago
Ok, I don't normally do this. EVER, But whilst doing my GCSE Sociology paper last week I found the most obvious, yet, descretely hidden Illuminati sign ever. Foreshadowing 9/11, made in 1998; so detailed and precise, yet still remaining hidden for 2 years of exams. People need to see it so can you come onto my channel + Like & Fav it? It would be much appreciated. And, i'm pretty sure you CAN'T flaw it. ZOMGAGDGFJG SB Its amazing, trust.
Smulborn 8 months ago
@Smulborn WOW 0.0 thanks for that info.
Catskywatcher113005 8 months ago
Thast exactly right. it gets burried, there books that i dont see any more in the libraries.
GalaticSpaceHero 8 months ago
Well, if you got guts, you can stand against ruling dogma and win like Darwin did (he had doubts, be he finally made it) or just step aside and moan about coservative science community that doesn't love innovative and unexpected things (however this looks more like inability to show firm proof).
It's easy to get "older" age in dating process if sample has wear, so the data will be corrupt too adding ages to the real age.
SwineNahNah 8 months ago
@SwineNahNah You clearly didn't listen to a word the woman towards the end of the video said; archaeology doesn't age test physical/outward appearance of artifacts, it tests the frequency of elemental occurence and cohesion of molecular bonds that both comprise the material(s) artifacts are made of. So it wouldn't matter how worn or eroded an artifact may appear, as long as there's enough of the artifact present to be tested (doesn't even have to be in tact) age can be accurately measured.
thelunknownl 7 months ago
The powers that be may in Fact have know our TRUE history!?..But..I don't think ANY of us REALLY have it down pat!?..I could NEVER buy into evolution "though I have a very scientific mind!"..I never really thought much of the Bible either!..I never had much understanding or desire on our TRUE history till I stumbled upon the "Ancient Astronaut" theory!...I HIGHLY suggest ANYONE that reads this PLEASE check this concept out!..Also please check out "Zecharia Sitchin" as well as the SUMERIANS!!
dgenerated 8 months ago
@dgenerated Sitchin is absolute nonsense. He changes the meanings of the Summerian words to man planets. THat not what they meant at all. And, if he was right, we would have seen the planet within the last 5,000 years, and we have not. Get your facts right at this website: w w w.exitmundi.nl/Planet-X.htm
305evan 8 months ago
let the human's ability to hide win.. we dont want the truth but a consensus truth... its the way it has been for centuries... stop bitchin about it... learn from america "truth is overrated"
forsakendemo 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It was those "Damn Dirty Apes"!!!!!
thrakd 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
after the global distruction (reset) the elite and the powers of illuminati will emerg from the ruins of man to fullfill there goal of reseeding the human sheep with there knowlage...thus becoming the ancient aliens of the past. fly to all lands to find and gather new sheep before the gas runs dry...give the knowlage to the next age of kings who hide behind man. resurch BRAVE NEW BOOKS and find your answers and conections. peace be upon you
rivi67 9 months ago
Why would you use 'Uranium Decay' for supposedly human artifacts? That would be like use a tractor trailer scale house to measure childrens medicine dose? No mention of what Dr. Steen-McIntyre wrote in her report. I'm not against dates that would overturn the state of any science... but extra ordinary evidence would be necessary, and a better theory that embrace the old stuff in a better light is a priori in these cases. Firm on a conclusion without a sufficient chain of arguments is bad.
granddad2002 9 months ago
If we make stone tools out of 50 million year old stone then the the tool will be 50 million year old not 50000 yr old, and if we make tools out of 250 thousand year old stone then it will be 250,000 year old not 20,000, sorry for her work getting rejected, but a bit of commen sence would save her career, if in both those sites human remains where found to be 50 million years old or 250,000 years old then it is a discovery which is kept hidden, as just dead animals have 2% Carbon 14 in them.
noname4096 9 months ago
This is covered up to safegaurd evolution theory. The real problem is with the rock layer dating system. Things are dated by what layer of rock theyre found in and the rocks are dated by what fossils are found in them. The fossils are dated by people guessing at the order they think animals evolved in. This stone tool could make people rethink how we date rock layers and thus also the fossils.
fnatic9 9 months ago
@fnatic9 Dating is largely validated with c14 decay tests. We know, very accurately, the decay rate of c14 and thus measuring what is found at a given level can establish a narrow date range.
Your facts are all muddled, sorry.
Dates are in no way determined by evolution, most dates were judged by historical references and anything outside of that was guess work until c14 testing helped solidify dates outside of about 6,000 years ago.
BTW, that is why original theories guessed on ~6000 years.
looncraz 9 months ago
@looncraz c14 dating is not validated and its not accurate. Youre comparing the amount of c14 in a fossil with the amount in the atmosphere. Then measuring the decay to find the age. But its a fact c14 in the atmosphere is still increasing and has not yet reached equilibrium. So fossils have alot less c14 compared with today because there was less c14 back then, not because it has decayed so long.
They still use guess work to date fossils. Its a conspiracy against truth and against God.
fnatic9 9 months ago
@fnatic9 ~Way to be current with your "knowledge" C-14 is not accurate past 50,000 years and so IS NOT USED to date most fossils. Uranium-lead dating is accurate to 4.5 billion years, however. Try "The Periodic Table of the Elements" and compare half-lives of radioisotopes. Or, are you one of the creatards that says radioisotopes don't exist?
pontecanis 9 months ago
@pontecanis Uranium-lead dating is the same premice as C-14. The daughter element lead is found literally everywhere, so theres no way of knowing how much is from decay. All radiometric dating methods are flawed and unreliable. They do not disprove the bible or the existence of God to the contrary the creation of all things is proof of God, enough proof for you?
fnatic9 9 months ago
@fnatic9 ~Thanks for telling us all you have no clue about radioactive decay, which is well-known and occurs at a constant rate for each element. None of this has anything to do with the existence of god, by the way, although for those who think Bishop Ussher was correct and those who are biblical literalists, it is bad news, as it helps to show that Genesis is a series of myths rather than reality. See the videos Mathematic Disproof of YEC and Noah's Flood: mathematically disproven: do the math
pontecanis 9 months ago
Nice circular argument for the existence of god though...doesn't mean a damn thing as it is a fallacy...I could equally argue that the creation of all things is proof of the Flying Spagetti Monster, or Zeus, or that the creation of all things is proof of dill pickles. That the universe exists argues either that it is eternal and always has existed, or that it was created. Assuming it was created then begs the question: how did the creator get created? If it is eternal, no creator is required.
pontecanis 9 months ago
Even agreeing the postulation of a creator is correct, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to suggest in any way that this creator would be the biblical god---the creator could just as easily be the Flying Spagetti Monster, PBUH. Ramen to you.
pontecanis 9 months ago
@pontecanis Ramen you too.XD
sintija007 9 months ago
@sintija007 ~Thanks! = ; > }
pontecanis 9 months ago
@fnatic9 Nope. Good try bible thumper !
hotbbojbud 9 months ago
@pontecanis Creatards,... Im gonna use that one
hotbbojbud 9 months ago
As they say, "Science progresses one funeral at a time".
Scientific knowledge is institutionalized and new knowledge always threatens the established power structure of the scientific community.
LordDyhalto 9 months ago
@mrgoldenguy100 wats that
Tyler909mak 9 months ago
If the history books were to be rewritten it would render a lot of peoples qualifications worthless.
arobekie 9 months ago
the footprints are from a giant flightless bird.
candyfinger2000 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
From 2:00 to 2:20 I called "bullshit" at least six times.
DarkSparkJ 9 months ago
@DarkSparkJ If you think people don't do that you are very naive indeed.... no offense....
Thistlesifter220 9 months ago
could we really serve mankind- instead of digging sacred burials-& give back lands to african & landless usa mothers & children instead of overworking laborers & not paying mothers & so as to pay scientists- "it wd have made my career"-"progress" ? more like destruction & cruel heartlessness
lmollot 9 months ago
there is an alterante view: that the dating of the strata is erroneous, that the rocks were laid during the flood of Noah so are recent, but either way orthodox theory is overturned
Strefanasha 9 months ago
I think that the major deception of the age is that UFO are extraterrestial beings when in fact they migh wee be spiritual beings manifesting physiscaly to us. Most of the UFO encounters and video analis conclude at some point that they move and interact as if they dont have any mass at all.
IsaacBG84 10 months ago
Excuse me! the suppression of evidence, or the suppression of the truth, is not an automatic matter, and was desired by the "architect of the matrix", and benefited those who shut their mouth in order that have their money and lives in the matrix (they sold out on you). It might not have disturb you in your "rat race", but it was harmful to your spiritual awareness and growth. Now, "they" (those who sold out on you and the architects) trying to dig themselve out of the lynch coming their way...
PhenomXmanifestO 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dont look at it!
mitomke 10 months ago
The guy in the video is a reptilian
souljaboyspongebob 10 months ago
all is yet but an illusion the artifacts you find is not from man but a different organisms that died off
sneolelodan 10 months ago
give your selves to crom the one mighty and true god. the illumanti do not what us to know about gobekil tepe because it will proove the existed of conan who had die for our sins to crom.
abarrathemaster 10 months ago
Where did the human blue blood come from if we evolved? Wheres the missing links?
zuesblueblood 10 months ago
@zuesblueblood all blood is blue it only turns red when oxygen mixes with it
reksub10 9 months ago
@reksub10
alrite sure thats what they use to tell me at skool but like i said to my teacher."yu tell me blood carrys oxygen to my organs etc n then tell me its blue until i have a gash then oxygen gets to it n it turns red"?are yu sure?lool
BRISTOL009 9 months ago
@BRISTOL009 yeah i dont know if its true ,cos blood carries oxygen anyway ,so how do they know this? lol
reksub10 9 months ago
@BRISTOL009 blood don't turn into blue, the veins that carry de-oxygenated blood look blue through the skin.
liquidus2172 9 months ago
@BRISTOL009 If you look at an open heart surgery you could probably see the blueish/ purplish vains gong to it as far as it turning red is do to the OVER SATURATION of oxygen.
MrButerfinger 9 months ago
@zuesblueblood missing link?? perhaps Luce is what you are looking for? You should try looking up some stuff one a web site called "talk origins.org".
MrButerfinger 9 months ago
Bizarre evidence no doubt because conspiracy theories are always bizarre. The evidence about the evolution of man is overwhelming and consistent. There are still gaps in the fossil record but the evidence from evolution of the human genome is very consistent with the fossil record.
ALTERED13TH 10 months ago
the earth is only 6,000 years old lets get the facts going do not hear what the eluminati what you to hear the darwin way of life the next step to darwin is robotics my friends they are turning us into machings for the new world order.
lovesack 10 months ago
@lovesack just fyi its the "illuminati"
silverwolf6970 10 months ago
@lovesack you will burn in hell for not worshipping corn the one true god and his son the mightly conan, you will no doudt froze in Hel the icly rleam while i will go up yp vanhaller and fovere drink bear and feast with the mightly conan
abarrathemaster 10 months ago
@abarrathemaster *gasp!* ....... Crom!....
820423 10 months ago
@lovesack are you familiar with carbon dating? and what about the evidence that suggests otherwise?
GoldenSilence16 10 months ago
what a crock of BS.Scientists thrive on true controversy, it is the lifeblood of what they do.The 'opinion' that scientists reject things that dont fit an excepted model obviously comes from the faulty logic of the creationists that made this video.
stratocaster539 10 months ago
all you sheple wake up
queensusana24 10 months ago
@queensusana24
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Genesis 6:3-5
We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.”
Numbers 13:32-33
hootyhaha 10 months ago
Dating methods are not accurate, thats the truth. The earth is not as old as man has exagerated
jiminiflix 10 months ago
and they say history repeats itself...
551batesroad 11 months ago
i believe our species has developed on this earth millions of years before our accepted dates and theories what is interesting is the rise in organized religeon in our early history from maybee 15,000 years ago and alot of the evidence points to extraterestrial interference. And as far as im concerned that is a bad thing, worship, slavery and then the disapearence of these civilisation with no good reason. Maybee the tearm it has happened and will happen again is a very real and scary thought..
nihilityjoey 11 months ago
@4:48...im not so sure about that.
kwarrior101 11 months ago
The oldest pottery on record is 19ooo yrs old. For me pottery is a good bench mark of the truly modern human. The women mentions the figure of 20 thousand yrs old as the expected age for a really old site. If the dating is correct it really isolates this site vis-a-vis the rest of the planet. It seems more likely that there was a problem with the dating.
rockbore 11 months ago
also, in New Mexico human hand prints where found in volcanic ash 65 million years old. All I can think of is that time travel really exists at least in the future, or perhaps we really did exist 65 million years ago. Open minds are needed here.
wildersara 11 months ago