I can't wait to scroll down the comments and see some retarded creationists trying to argue that discovered evidence is invalid, and their favorite book proves that an imaginary magic man in the sky just done did it all... yep, there they are!
i like how for the advert for this video, theyre going to mars, using a space shuttle, which has been abandoned and we wont still be using it by 2030 and cannot land on a planets surface like the saturn V lunar module could.
More crap from the brainwashed, Newspeak, Cult of Darwin. Find the bones on an extinct primate and they start foaming at the mouth. Then the "useful idiots" regurgitate the propaganda like it's a religion. But if you are gullible enough to believe you evolved from pond scum, sea moss or whatever single celled slime you might imagine, then why not?
@luciferiexcelsil Do you suggest time space and matter always existed? I can prove using very simple math that is impossible. Time, space and matter had a beginning thus it came from nothing. Now let me qualify "came from nothing." It came from nothing that we could possibly comprehend, because God created everything we know. Eliminate time, space and matter and what do you have? Nothing OR God. You believe in nothing I believe in God.
@rockthecityatnight according to that then... Yahweh must have been created by someone else then, or not existed at one point... you said a lot yet you said nothing, lol.
@luciferiexcelsil No you simply do not comprehend. Yahweh CREATED existence itself as you know it. Or in other words Yahweh does not exist in Time, Space and Matter because he created it. You are trying to put Yahweh into the bottle he put you in.
@rockthecityatnight how can something that existed before existence be? something that does not exist in time, space and matter is simply something that does not exist at all, Universe=all things, if something does not fit into the definition of Universe, simply can't/doesn't exist. if you tell me he is in another realm of reality... well, so are unicorns, fairies, elfs, and sincere politicians.
@luciferiexcelsil I don't know. But if the universe began 14 billion years ago per modern science, then what was there before the universe began? I believe in causality, that an intelligent source beyond time and space created the universe. You believed the universe just popped into existence all by itself and then humans popped up out of the sea all by themselves. Now that's believing in unicorns, fairies, elfs, etc.
@rockthecityatnight lol, really? i guess it makes more sense believing that materal things came from mere chance and variation of energy.. than that sometime, at a time that there was no time, when nothing at all existed, a magical man existed, who created himself before he existed.
and well, the "just popped up" thing you say, I suggest you re-take highschool and college science to see that according to science, things just didn't "popped up".
@luciferiexcelsil What part of "God always existed" don't you understand? Either God always existed or time, space and matter always existed. And we know time, space and matter didn't always exist, it had a beginning and thus a Creator! And yes, I know what the Cult of Darwin believes, a serious of amazing random events produced the first living cell. Then via an amazing chain of "random mutations" acted on my "natural selection" we arrived at gullible primates like yourself.
@rockthecityatnight "Cult of Darwin" LOL, you are from the U.S aren't you? I wonder why U.S is seen in the rest of the world as a cultural and intellectual wasteland... lol.. read the origin of species book... Darwin never talks about the origin of life, he only talks of the origin of species, which is backed up by DNA many more sources. A dog was always a dog? hmmm, funny that not long ago dogs were called wolves. Historical evidence and all.
@luciferiexcelsil I've read it what do you want to know? And dogs prove that evolution does not happen. Dogs are a result of selected isolation of traits. This process actually reduces the amount of information in the genome. You can breed a wolf into a poodle but you cannot reverse the process due to this loss of genetic information. This is why they are going all over the world collecting seeds for food crops. We are losing genetic information for our food. Once gone, it's gone forever.
@rockthecityatnight "Dogs are a result of selected isolation of traits." That's what natural selection is! Living things of the same specie will have slight differences between each other, some of this differences will benefit certain individuals of a specie in certain environment changes, and with time, the traits become more and more prominent, until the trait separates the descendants of that individual so much with the original specie, that a new specie is form! you proved Darwin right!
@rockthecityatnight that "isolation of traits" was made through selection, made by human, to fit the human's needs,artificial selection, an environment can do that too! You may ask, why are there still any wolves?
the ones that didn't have these traits beneficial for humans, simply stayed in the forest, and stayed as wolves because they had developed to be fit for a life in the forests!... this would be considered. Did you ever take science in school? are American schools that backward?
primatess walk on 2 feet all the time cmon with this crap evolution is real but we didnt evolve from primate we were enhanced from primates and again there is alot of proof to discredit the THEORY of evolution
Fascinating stuff and scientific find. Even though Cenk and Ana say some dumb things once in a while, they're usually good and make a really great team.
wait, so the somewhat intelligent, sweet males passed on their genetics? you sure wouldn't know it from seeing the males we have today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thumbs up if you agree
wait, so the somewhat intelligent, sweet males passed on their genetics? you sure wouldn't know it from seeing the males we have today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No "shared ancestor" or "common ancestor' for us Homo Sapiens exists and that is a SCIENTIFIC FACT.
Homo Sapiens have existed for at least 200,000 years and all scientists (including Darwinists) agree we didnt come from Ardi, Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, Chimps, or any Neanderthals.
The say we "diverged" in lineage from an UNFOUND ancestor__FACT
It has never been found, nor ever will be, because its a MYTH. He were made in a LAB. Product of experimentation.
@buffboynick True what you say. We have no tangible proof man has ever evolved. Even in these 5000 or so years of RECORDED history, we see no new structures in out body, only adaptations (like skin color or long hair) but no new structures. Even in fruit flies (which we have grown tens of thousands of generations of) have not grown any new features or structures. Only thing that changed was their colors and habits. And the mutations they underwent were all negative and fatal. Oops God 1
I actually think it isnt God doing it (but ET, as my channel page shows). This planet is a bio-sphere project and lab experiment. Its obvious.
I do think God exists though. I just dont think God has designed anything in this 3rd dimension though. God doesnt make imperfect holograms (and thats what this 3D illusion of particles has been shown to be)
The real God seems to be infinite, eternal, multi-dimensional "conscious energy'
@buffboynick So you believe in a higher being but dont believe Christianity or organized religion is the right way to go about knowing more about said being? I respect your point of view and I have no idea to change it. At least you are better than atheists who reject the idea of a creator God and imply everything magically came from nothing and arranged itself miraculously.
God and the soul have both been scientifically proven, so atheists are clearly delusional CULT members.
In fact....I have undeniable confirmed evidence the soul exists and could send you that video if you'd like.
As for Christianity......you have to to goto the source if you are a true Christian. And the "true" Christians are Orthodox Christians that only read the original HEBREW version of the bible and NOT the King James Version (which is different). God/soul = 100% real
What do you think we are automatons? Are We really an accident? I may believe in evolution but I also believe that we have souls. And are some people who have died and came back to prove that we are more than a flesh and blood physical beings. You should take some time alone and maditate if their is than this existence.
@buffboynick It's funny how atheist and Christians argue so much, yet they're so alike. They're both stubborn, ignorant, and closed minded. They think they have the solution to everything. While I agree with the methods used by atheists, I do disagree about the predicted ''big bang''. It'd be cool if we had an afterlife, but it can't be determined by man. If we were all to agree that we're incapable of determining such things, we'd be better off. In my opinion, of course.
"At least you are better than atheists who reject the idea of a creator God and imply everything magically came from nothing and arranged itself miraculously"
No atheist or scientist as ever said anything close to that ,,,,,,YOU ARE LYING
You are the one that claims something came from nothing....GOD what or who created god......if you claim it always existed why not give the same allowance to the universe.
@oopscanada Thats Okay, our species has grown up to understand time scales in terms of our experience, same with distances, i think it was sagan that said the universe is not stranger than you imagine it may be stranger than you can imagine. that is to say our brains have trouble understanding concepts that seem to go against our experience. Look at an evolutionary timeline, its huge, its rediculous, we have only been around for a the flicker of a moment.
Thats not "the bottom line" of how it happened, it is a theory. I believe in evolution, but the specifics of how each link developed are totally up for speculation.
@oopscanada We have witnessed new species happening, you need an organism with a short enough life span that you can go through many generations in a short time but moths, butterflys, insects have been observed to change into a different species.
It's unfortunate that you think this way, the evidence is there and it is overwhelming, your already on the internet please go check for yourself. U will have a stronger position theologically if u stop denying facts about reality.
@shandcunt We have seen fruit flies mutate, and adapt to new "fruitflies". Here my question again: Where are the new species? And I'm talking about Macro evolution, not your simple adaptation of the specie to the environment. I'm not talking about changing colours. That's already taken care of in the genes, in the DNA or not? Just look around you, you don't new species of humans, just one specie in diff colours. So, why not be honest, and accept what has been observed: No evolution.
I understand your point. That is, if Evolution happened, **and** God *is* the creator of all things, *then, God used evolution as a tool. Well, first of all, the 2nd part is true. God *is* the creator of all things. However, the first part *is* False, the evolution is *not* true. It is not true, because as a "nice" theory, has not been proven to be true. The records indicate there are *no* in between beings, they're all complete.
Furthermore, we do not see evolution happening at the moment. We see species "adapting" but we do not see, *****NEW****** species being formed from others. And I mean literally new. In addition, when scientists discover more and more how cells are organized, how the DNA, the R/NA, the protein molecules, the cell membrane, the cloning of them, etc, etc, etc, it turns out that evolution cannot explain how this was formed. All systems as we know them, are too complex to be derived by "CHANCE".
@oopscanada We cannot see new species being formed right now because it takes thousands maybe millions of generations and mutations to form a new specie. But some living organisms like viruses mutate quickly enough for us to observe their transformation. As we speak, the HIV virus is much more resistant to drogues than 30 years ago.
It's not complex to understand all this. Nature has more credibility than humans written history.
Yes, some living organism mutate. However, you cannot compare viruses to multicelular beings who "supposedly" change into new species. So, here is my question again: Where are the new species?
Where are the really new "animals"? Other than reptiles, mammals, amphibians, birds, fish, Where is the new species?
Ok, let's start with the hypothesis, that it takes thousands of generations. In any case, we should see a generation in transition or not? We should the old species being changed or not? However, fossils found, just prove what we see now: Crabs are crabs, lobsters remain lobsters, sharks are sharks, reptiles are reptiles, fish are fish. Where are the transitions today? Why did they stop? Isn't this supposed to be an ongoing process? Where are the talking monkeys?
Evolutionists, like this ignorant guy of the TYT network, want to see a physical god, to believe there is a God. However, this makes no sense, as if God is spirit, and invisible, he is not a person that you can find in the clouds, that is ridiculous. Nobody wants to see a God, that will treat you like a puppet. However, God, has given you free will to choose to believe in him or not. If you don't believe in him, and are thankful, then you know the consequences. Well, too bad for you.
... however, up to today, man thinks. What a though is. Why we're able to reason, and come up with new ideas. This intelligence, which we do not see, is an invisible manifestation and a witness non-material things. If God exists, then, he manifests himself through creation, and through his words. The greeks, the egyptians, the romans, they wanted to see a God physically; so, they created images. That's what evolutionists want to do, they want to see God, but they cannot see hm.
@oopscanada Wait, you're accusing the others of making images when the whole bible is filled with them? The snake for example, or the tree of knowledge... When the bible says that god spoke to create stuff, that's an image STOLEN from the egyptians.
As long as you can't prove that non material things exist, your god will be a simple belief and nothing more, no matter what you say.
I don't see your point. Non material things exist. Your thought is non-material. When people think, scientists can see their "sparks" interaction among the neurons, but thoughts themselves are non material. They cannot be extracted from somebody and stored in a jar. So, yes, non-material things exist. Furthermore, when man has built-in morals, and therefore, makes laws such as do not kill, then, this proves to you that this "matter" is more than organic material.
In image on a computer is stored as a series of bits, which have a value off/on, depending on the physical characteristic of the actual media being used. So, yes, it has a material representation. And you can take any hardware reader of the bits and recreate the image *at will*.
my only consolation with this, really, is that NOBODY in politics can EVER top the dumbest anti-evolution argument I've heard. I do quote here:
"at least the Bible makes sense. I mean, evolution tells me that if I leave a rock next to some water for a hundred years it'll turn into a person."
if you ever get to the time when a politician gets THAT stupid (Sarah Palin excused for probably already being past that point) you need to abandon the country immediately.
@truepridejb its news because its important. If its another species that knows how to walk upright, like bigfoot, then gee, i guess that would be news too.
@grendelee I'm sure there are a lot of undiscovered creatures on our planet. After all, they DID discover that bacteria that has arsenic as a component, which puts scientists in a tiff since everything on our planet that is living doesnt have arsenic as part of its makeup. Meaning life can exsist litterally anywhere now, since oxygen or an atmosphere is now irrelevant.
@truepridejb - or indeed why did these creatures HAVE to be an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT species and NOT OUR ancestors? I know - so it fits in with your bible. LOL
Lucy is a chimpanzee!!!!!!!!!!! That is a proven fact!!!!!!!!!!!!! The "missing links" are still missing. Ardi, is too incomplete to draw so much info from, it doesn't even have a freakin spine.
am not sayin you all are my brothers and shit no way. but thats how it startet and you can still find it in allmost everything who exist in our fuckin planet .dna compare is a proof . so we can fuck adam in his ass hole and stop callin him father...
stop all pls stop you wackness we all are related in one or another we all are from the the same thing who startet it. what ever a meteor or it just startet here its cuz of our planet we are here . animals or whatever fish or i dont know what .life is a thing who allways will mix or start as new or evovle . we all have dna to compare even micro things you cant even see but if its 0.000001% dna compare we still are related !
the depiction as to why we walk upright now despite being in the woods seems like a pretty gigantic leap, aren't there equally plausible alternative scenarios, like for example, better leverage, greater potential for being able to over power other animals; greater dexterity when moving through forests. Seems not only an over simplification but a big leap in reason. I'm not saying it's wrong but what other evidence gives this merit?
wow evolution is such a CRAP mix in uranus! evolution isn't real at all. the skeleton could have been an actual skeleton of an old ape that may have had birth defects when born. geez people will do anythign to talk about this crap nowadays
@theamazingtoot " could have been an actual skeleton of an old ape that may have had birth defects when born. geez people will do anythign to talk about this crap nowadays "
Really? What is your scientific source for this observation?
@LanteanKnight maybe I shouldn't of said "in their current form" Apes are able to carry food and we evolved from apes. So my point was that an Ape learning how to carry food to get a partner sounds pretty lame.
OK, I am a BIG supporter of evolution. I debated a creationist just a few hours ago but this really sounds far fetched - two legs to be able to bring food? C'mon! wtf
Apes bring food and stuff as well as use tools while being quadruped. Now what?
@MRaverz LOL! Go & tell that to the creationists. I do know it is a fact, chill. It is just that the idea of having to bring food every once in a while infuencing evolution is rather silly and I wanted to say that without looking biased since no one would bother checking my account before answering something stupid about no evidence for Jesus or whatever.
@sapunec7854 well, the misconception is that she went totally straight up as we are... You can simply carry your food with you which apes also do, true. But that just proves how close relatives we are.
bit of advice, never say, "and that's the bottom line of how it happened." We don't know that. It's a tentative hypothesis, among several other tentative hypotheses.
That has got to be one of the dumbest fucking explanations I've ever heard. I suppose T-rex and Kangaroos also were just carrying food around for sex.
No, they did't (T-Rexes "arms" were just too small, besides, they likely were scavengers... T-Rex carrying around some bits of partly rotten carcass?!... yak!) and they don't (kangoroos are herbivores and "bringing a bit of grass" makes no sense).
However explanation sucks a bit, I agree. Carrying food is important when female is pregnant or nursing babies, BEFORE that it's only needed to prove, that male is able to care for family, so explanation is a partial fail.
There's simply too many moronic theists spamming their bullshit while having made virtually no research into what evolution actually says. To fully know how evolution works, it would take years of knowledge to be taught from such fields as molecular biology, biochemistry, genetics, paleontology, physical chemistry, biophysics, inorganic chemistry, organic chemistry, cellular biology, and other related fields. Not only that, it's recommended that one go through years of research afterwards.
Actually it does't take many years to cope with the basic idea of natural selection (if you don't go into detail how DNA's information is accumulated and then transformed into a living being), primitive logic is enough and that doesn't require any education, just a bit of common sense, but some* theists are simply too stupid to understand even basics.
* - Roman Catholic and most large Protestant churches officially approve evolution (not crazy enough to deny obvious 8D )
@SwineNahNah That's why I said "to fully know" how it works, it requires a lot of what I mentioned. I'm currently a grad student in the field of biochemistry (my secondary field being medicinal chemistry and natural product synthesis).
there's a creature. it is born with a defect that makes it more susceptible to its environment. this defect makes the creature more able to survive and more sexually attractive, this creature is thus more likely to mate, thus the defect is passed on. small changes like this occur over time, thus a species changes. just like tree man, if his defect was beneficial to survival, he'd mate and thus we'd have tree people.
I love how these guys think they're so smart and educated. So Adam and Eve is a stupid idea? Pure fantasy? You know what sounds like fantasy to me? Bacteria floating in a swamp which somehow became a fish. Then that fish somehow crawled to land and became a reptile. Then that reptile became a monkey. THEN, somehow that monkey grew into a person. That sounds like a pretty good fantasy too.
@puppetmasterfiles clearly you have no real understanding of evolution. First of all, bacteria didn't turn into fish, macro-evolution occurs over hundreds of millions of years. Secondly, fish didn't turn into reptiles, some evolved into amphibians first (check out the mudskipper which is an amphibian fish that uses it front fins to "walk" on land with), then after more hundreds of millions of years some of those evolved into reptiles. Finally, some reptiles evolved into mammals. To put it simply
@puppetmasterfiles Evolution is a fact. Micro-evolution happens all the time, how else could different variants of beasts be "created", such as various horses, dogs, cows, etc. Macro-evolution is the same thing, but occurring over vast vast time scales. Darwin's theory to explain how evolution works has survived over 150 years of vigorous scientific testing, including modern day genetics testing.
The "evidence" for Adam and Eve comes from copper age sheep herders. Sounds like fantasy to me.
Lmao just because you found a half human/half ape creature doesn't mean you evolved from it. What if it's an alien? 0_o What if it's just a creature who existed with our ancestors? What if it's another form of ape that was wiped out? So because you found an ape that kinda looks human that makes it your ancestor...?
@puppetmasterfiles it would be really interesting if a species of ape evolved to be able to walk, died out, then a second species evolved walking a second time. Occum's razor suggests to me that we evolved from the walking ape 4 million years ago.
Absolutely fascinating! Too bad anti-Evolution, Flat Earthers will never believe it- no matter much evidence is found. They're too busy searching for Noah's Ark while making sure not to fall off the edge of the Earth!
Evolution hasn't found any missing links, we was created and our ancestors weren't ROCKS. You laughing when in fact u believe we came about from micro-organism which was form by the rainning of millions of years on rocks.???
"Raining on rocks" That's a pretty ignorant statement, I mean; if you're going to insult a theory, at least be educated on the subject. Disrespectful and dishonest, on purpose or not. The truth, it took about a billion years for photosynthetic cells to appear and later evovle into; more capable cells which could split water (photosynthetsis), multi celluar, and eventually vertebrates appeared on land. It's more complex, but you're a dumbass.
@christmasdnc the further you go back on the evolution thing the more ridiculous it look. Prob just as ridiculus you might find that some people believe that God who have no beginning or end created all this. Furthermore i was using simple terms because you do beleive we came from raning for billions years on rocks. How did the photosynthetic cells form or came from? rocks and rain.
The theory of Evolution and the theory of the Big Bang are separate ideas; I ask again; how educated on the subject are you? You say "What about the elements, did they evolve too, or are did they come from the big bang? Did carbon evolve to helium? It just doesn't make sense" That's got to be one of the silliest questions I've ever heard. You don't even know the dif between one theory and another... these subjects are much too mass to explain to someone as ignorant as you.
@christmasdnc If anyone was wondering how to create carbon, well that requires hydrogen, then fusion, and perhaps a few supernovas under the right conditions.
@christmasdnc furthermore what about the elements? did they evolve too. or they just came from the big bang? did carbon evolve to helium? It just doesnt make sense. Hope you come to the truth...
lmao! these early woman/apes are pretty smart if you ask me, I have sex with both men one the alpha male so my babies will be strong and the other male will think that hes the father and he brings me lots of food so ill keep him around :D hehe she like a goldigger of the past or the original goldigger :) way to hand it to ardi she was rather smart for being a early human!
Some people are still kids. Hey, I wonder after so many years, evolution has not found a fix for terminal diseases. They are bad for a population, and they still get inherited. Hum....
@oopscanada Really? Your argument against the existence of evolution is that there are still genetic diseases? Many genetic diseases do not become fatal until after puberty, by which time they may have been passed to the next generation. Many others are developed because both parents have an allele, one copy of which did not make them sick. However if the offspring inherits two copies of that same allele, they develop the disease. DNA is so complex that it makes mistakes from time to time.
@anscibecca86 I'm just trying to find the logic here. Evolution gets rid of a tail and supposedly make apes erect to deal with new environment conditions, food availability, and threats. But, it cannot get rid, after hundreds, thousands or millions of years of genetic mutations that give rise to congenital/genetic weaknesses or diseases? Sorry; I don't see the logic there.
@oopscanada It's because most genetic weaknesses are recessive. Carriers are generally not selected against, and sometimes are even selected for (classic example being sickle cell anemia). Pretty much every person, even if they are completely healthy, is a carrier for a handful of recessive diseases. They have no impact on the carriers' fitness. But if two carriers of the same disease have a child together, there is a chance they could inherit two mutated alleles, and thus have the full disease.
@oopscanada Also, would you rather admit that evolution created mistakes in DNA coding or that God did? Many monotheists, including Christians, like to claim that God doesn't make mistakes. With all the mistakes in our bodies and in the eco-system, that would tend to show that either God made mistakes or that they happened because of spontaneous mutations and genetic damage caused by inflammation in cells and radiation which were passed on to the next generation.
@anscibecca86-- well obviously, if you want to understand God, and how/why he allows diseases to enter the world, then, you won't find it in Darwinists forums. However, if you proposing that DNA mistakes are the causes of genetical diseases, I can't argue with you on that. DNA has the potential to make mistakes of course. Sorry, I don't understand your point.
Anyway; you guys get upset easily when illusions like "Ardi" are found to be yet, another failed attempt to prove evolution of apes into humans. Anyway; as somebody said, you can't make an evolutionist think. You have to find the answers on your own.
@FURepublicans - hey listen; I read that book so long, long ago, that I forget the details. If humans did not have a common ancestor, according to Darwin that it was Ape-like, then what was it? At no point I quoted Darwin, just to pointing out what most science school books draw in their pages, when they describe evolution: a series of Ape-like creatures, followed by human-like creatures, finally, "suddenly" followed by a man. Nice imagination, of course; keep up the good work?
Exactly, a fact is verifiable evidence. Bones that have been found to be a hoax, or *not the oldest ancestor of humans", as TYT in this video,pretend to announce, is *NOT* a fact.
200 Transitions? really? A collection of ape bones, found in different parts of Africa and Europe cannot account for a transition. Evolutionary processes, as proposed cannot provide an explanation of the jump from lizard to ape to human. Only evolutionists believe this fantasy. Why don't you find the real truth?
I did not say the origin of life. That would be abiogenesis. Although it's well known that life did not come up out of emptyness. It was formed by a designer.
"Although it's well known that life did not come up out of emptyness."
Not even the most staunch atheist makes the assertion that life appeared from nothing.
"It was formed by a designer."
Intelligent Design still doesn't have an active scientific theory, and every single piece of evidence it has posited has proven to be inconclusive, or flat out wrong. There's absolutely no tangible reason to assume that life on this planet was designed by anything other than Natural Selection.
Actually, evolution is not a fact. A fact is evidence by itself. Fossils of old animals are not an evidence of evolution. Evolution tries to explain the origin of species; however, the explanation falls short, as to show an evolution, you have to show the sequence. Yet, to explain a sequence, we are told, ".. and millions of years later, from the ape, there appear man"; sorry; that's quite a stretch.
So, excuses are found, such as this "oldest human ancestor", and it's found to be not it.
@doctaword No, I think oopscanada was right. Evolutionary theory explains the origin of species. If he'd said, "the origin of LIFE" then I would have corrected him that abiogenesis tries to explain that.
@doctaword Diversity in animals is also known as Species. Thats why Charles Darwin's book is called "On the origin of species." Abiogenesis is more like "On the origin of life"
@doctaword If I'm not mistaken the theory of evolution actually does explain the origin of species, and therefor the diversity in animals. Abiogenesis is a theory explaining the origin of life in general.
@doctaword Nope; I think you got it wrong too. Abiogenesis tries to explain the origin of life. Assuming that life came about "on its own" (boy, you have to have blind faith for this), then, the idol of all atheist, Charles, introduces evolution in his book published in 1859 under the title "On the Origin of Species.". I don't mind if you can go ahead and correct Charlie for his mistake then.
@oopscanada - and of course you don't need 'blind faith' to believe the theory about bearded old man living in the clouds who loves us SO MUCH - but can't handle rejection so will torture us for eternity if we don't do what HIS priests tell us to do.
Don't confuse Zeus with The Lord, and only God. Your pagan rituals from your ancestors turned out to be an abomination, and the mount Olympus turned out to be a regular mountain, with no gods. In any case, believing in God, does not involve theories. You're very wrong there. Believing in God, means believing in a spiritual life, that has nothing to do with atoms, elements, or matter. The moral character, the intelligence, they all have physical manifestations, however
@oopscanada Your story of The Lord isn't actually a perfect tale either.. Bible is a really poor source of information because it's not an antique historical source.. Many people changed it through history and many things were added that were not in the original source, even adding some Greek folklore elements in.
I agree that there have been mistakes in the translations. But, that only proves one thing: There were originals. If these originals talked about supposedly "tales" about the Ark of Noah, which many of you like to laugh about, why then, the "exactly same story" is told by the Mayans in a book called the Popol-Vuh? Why, if the Mayans are on another continent tell exactly the same story *way before* the Spaniards came to America? Unless it was true? Andy they're descendants?
Also, the mountain of Genetic evidence for evolution was more than Darwin or Mendel could have ever dreamed. Fossil evidence is only a small part of the vast amount of facts supporting the theory.
I've found that the only people who actually disregard evolution as "Just a theory" or "Not a fact" are those who don't actually understand the subject.
Oh boy. This tyt has to eat his words now. Ardy hArdly qualifoes as an ancestor to humans. Ha ha. In Times magazine article, Ardi: The Human Ancestor Who Wasn't?
the famous missing link has been downgraded to monkey status. So far for a hope to prove evolution of species.
@oopscanada The point of this isn't to prove evolution. Evolution is a fact. We know based on fossils, skeletons, etc...that species have evolved. What this is discussing is how relevant Ardi is to understanding human origins.
It's kinda hard to swallow a theory which has no real evidence, just a bunch of skeletal fragments from apes possibly mixed in with human bones, with no footage of the arduous digging and compare and contrast. There is also the fossil dating that is said to be flawed but we still consider to be somewhat accurate. And if we are 200,000yrs old then where is this speciation creature that is at the edge of being human? and according to "fossil record" there is no consistency. when will we evolve?
Technically our next big evolution should be near if you consider the state of the world. We overpopulated and most of our ressources are gone, only the fittest will survive the coming chaos, if any survives.
Also the universe and time may be cyclic, thus removing the need of a creator.
We know nothing about our history, yet we refrute the Bible which gives us a breakdown of how we came to be and the end. Yes the Bible is almost like other religions and ancient civilized writings, but these similarities weren't related nor translatable for ages after the Bible was written. According to the Bible time didn't exist until after God fashioned the universe and created light(what we measure time with). Which means we cant really know when the Universe was really created.
this guy mumbles way too much.. just say it!
speeddemond1991 4 days ago
I can't wait to scroll down the comments and see some retarded creationists trying to argue that discovered evidence is invalid, and their favorite book proves that an imaginary magic man in the sky just done did it all... yep, there they are!
PlanetOfTheMonkeys 1 month ago 4
i like how for the advert for this video, theyre going to mars, using a space shuttle, which has been abandoned and we wont still be using it by 2030 and cannot land on a planets surface like the saturn V lunar module could.
evymetal95 3 months ago
More crap from the brainwashed, Newspeak, Cult of Darwin. Find the bones on an extinct primate and they start foaming at the mouth. Then the "useful idiots" regurgitate the propaganda like it's a religion. But if you are gullible enough to believe you evolved from pond scum, sea moss or whatever single celled slime you might imagine, then why not?
rockthecityatnight 5 months ago
@rockthecityatnight didn't Yahweh create man from dirt?
luciferiexcelsil 4 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil Actually Yahweh created the dirt from nothing.
rockthecityatnight 4 months ago
@rockthecityatnight hmmm, how does that make sense? creating something from nothing? lol
luciferiexcelsil 4 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil Do you suggest time space and matter always existed? I can prove using very simple math that is impossible. Time, space and matter had a beginning thus it came from nothing. Now let me qualify "came from nothing." It came from nothing that we could possibly comprehend, because God created everything we know. Eliminate time, space and matter and what do you have? Nothing OR God. You believe in nothing I believe in God.
rockthecityatnight 4 months ago
@rockthecityatnight according to that then... Yahweh must have been created by someone else then, or not existed at one point... you said a lot yet you said nothing, lol.
luciferiexcelsil 4 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil No you simply do not comprehend. Yahweh CREATED existence itself as you know it. Or in other words Yahweh does not exist in Time, Space and Matter because he created it. You are trying to put Yahweh into the bottle he put you in.
rockthecityatnight 4 months ago
@rockthecityatnight how can something that existed before existence be? something that does not exist in time, space and matter is simply something that does not exist at all, Universe=all things, if something does not fit into the definition of Universe, simply can't/doesn't exist. if you tell me he is in another realm of reality... well, so are unicorns, fairies, elfs, and sincere politicians.
luciferiexcelsil 4 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil I don't know. But if the universe began 14 billion years ago per modern science, then what was there before the universe began? I believe in causality, that an intelligent source beyond time and space created the universe. You believed the universe just popped into existence all by itself and then humans popped up out of the sea all by themselves. Now that's believing in unicorns, fairies, elfs, etc.
rockthecityatnight 4 months ago
@rockthecityatnight lol, really? i guess it makes more sense believing that materal things came from mere chance and variation of energy.. than that sometime, at a time that there was no time, when nothing at all existed, a magical man existed, who created himself before he existed.
and well, the "just popped up" thing you say, I suggest you re-take highschool and college science to see that according to science, things just didn't "popped up".
luciferiexcelsil 4 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil What part of "God always existed" don't you understand? Either God always existed or time, space and matter always existed. And we know time, space and matter didn't always exist, it had a beginning and thus a Creator! And yes, I know what the Cult of Darwin believes, a serious of amazing random events produced the first living cell. Then via an amazing chain of "random mutations" acted on my "natural selection" we arrived at gullible primates like yourself.
rockthecityatnight 4 months ago
@rockthecityatnight "Cult of Darwin" LOL, you are from the U.S aren't you? I wonder why U.S is seen in the rest of the world as a cultural and intellectual wasteland... lol.. read the origin of species book... Darwin never talks about the origin of life, he only talks of the origin of species, which is backed up by DNA many more sources. A dog was always a dog? hmmm, funny that not long ago dogs were called wolves. Historical evidence and all.
luciferiexcelsil 4 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil I've read it what do you want to know? And dogs prove that evolution does not happen. Dogs are a result of selected isolation of traits. This process actually reduces the amount of information in the genome. You can breed a wolf into a poodle but you cannot reverse the process due to this loss of genetic information. This is why they are going all over the world collecting seeds for food crops. We are losing genetic information for our food. Once gone, it's gone forever.
rockthecityatnight 4 months ago
Comment removed
luciferiexcelsil 3 months ago
@rockthecityatnight "Dogs are a result of selected isolation of traits." That's what natural selection is! Living things of the same specie will have slight differences between each other, some of this differences will benefit certain individuals of a specie in certain environment changes, and with time, the traits become more and more prominent, until the trait separates the descendants of that individual so much with the original specie, that a new specie is form! you proved Darwin right!
luciferiexcelsil 3 months ago
@rockthecityatnight that "isolation of traits" was made through selection, made by human, to fit the human's needs,artificial selection, an environment can do that too! You may ask, why are there still any wolves?
the ones that didn't have these traits beneficial for humans, simply stayed in the forest, and stayed as wolves because they had developed to be fit for a life in the forests!... this would be considered. Did you ever take science in school? are American schools that backward?
luciferiexcelsil 3 months ago
@luciferiexcelsil stop yacking either come with some proof or stfu cause your just guessing calling other people out shut up
biglove599 1 month ago
@biglove599 guessing? I'm guessing you never read the Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" then.
luciferiexcelsil 1 month ago
primatess walk on 2 feet all the time cmon with this crap evolution is real but we didnt evolve from primate we were enhanced from primates and again there is alot of proof to discredit the THEORY of evolution
hier222 5 months ago
Comment removed
ndyag1 5 months ago
Fascinating stuff and scientific find. Even though Cenk and Ana say some dumb things once in a while, they're usually good and make a really great team.
ridewave444 6 months ago
wait, so the somewhat intelligent, sweet males passed on their genetics? you sure wouldn't know it from seeing the males we have today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thumbs up if you agree
AngelaODonald 7 months ago
wait, so the somewhat intelligent, sweet males passed on their genetics? you sure wouldn't know it from seeing the males we have today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AngelaODonald 7 months ago
Evolution = bullshit
No "shared ancestor" or "common ancestor' for us Homo Sapiens exists and that is a SCIENTIFIC FACT.
Homo Sapiens have existed for at least 200,000 years and all scientists (including Darwinists) agree we didnt come from Ardi, Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, Chimps, or any Neanderthals.
The say we "diverged" in lineage from an UNFOUND ancestor__FACT
It has never been found, nor ever will be, because its a MYTH. He were made in a LAB. Product of experimentation.
buffboynick 8 months ago
@buffboynick True what you say. We have no tangible proof man has ever evolved. Even in these 5000 or so years of RECORDED history, we see no new structures in out body, only adaptations (like skin color or long hair) but no new structures. Even in fruit flies (which we have grown tens of thousands of generations of) have not grown any new features or structures. Only thing that changed was their colors and habits. And the mutations they underwent were all negative and fatal. Oops God 1
Amritizcool66 7 months ago
@Amritizcool66
I actually think it isnt God doing it (but ET, as my channel page shows). This planet is a bio-sphere project and lab experiment. Its obvious.
I do think God exists though. I just dont think God has designed anything in this 3rd dimension though. God doesnt make imperfect holograms (and thats what this 3D illusion of particles has been shown to be)
The real God seems to be infinite, eternal, multi-dimensional "conscious energy'
Our souls are a great example of "part" of God
buffboynick 7 months ago
@buffboynick I'm not sure How to respond to your comment.
Amritizcool66 7 months ago
@Amritizcool66
I am 100% pure "Deist"
Its the original "faith" (before organized religions)
buffboynick 7 months ago
@buffboynick So you believe in a higher being but dont believe Christianity or organized religion is the right way to go about knowing more about said being? I respect your point of view and I have no idea to change it. At least you are better than atheists who reject the idea of a creator God and imply everything magically came from nothing and arranged itself miraculously.
Amritizcool66 7 months ago
@Amritizcool66
God and the soul have both been scientifically proven, so atheists are clearly delusional CULT members.
In fact....I have undeniable confirmed evidence the soul exists and could send you that video if you'd like.
As for Christianity......you have to to goto the source if you are a true Christian. And the "true" Christians are Orthodox Christians that only read the original HEBREW version of the bible and NOT the King James Version (which is different). God/soul = 100% real
buffboynick 7 months ago
@buffboynick
Fail.........The soul has most certainly NOT been proved......there isn't even any remotely convincing evidence that such a thing exists.
PLEASE STOP TALKING OUT YOUR ASS
RedlineMMA 6 months ago 15
@RedlineMMA
What do you think we are automatons? Are We really an accident? I may believe in evolution but I also believe that we have souls. And are some people who have died and came back to prove that we are more than a flesh and blood physical beings. You should take some time alone and maditate if their is than this existence.
Chaliamusiclover 2 months ago
@buffboynick It's funny how atheist and Christians argue so much, yet they're so alike. They're both stubborn, ignorant, and closed minded. They think they have the solution to everything. While I agree with the methods used by atheists, I do disagree about the predicted ''big bang''. It'd be cool if we had an afterlife, but it can't be determined by man. If we were all to agree that we're incapable of determining such things, we'd be better off. In my opinion, of course.
QuintonioT 5 months ago
@buffboynick I can't do much more then to facepalm.
MrDivined 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Amritizcool66
"At least you are better than atheists who reject the idea of a creator God and imply everything magically came from nothing and arranged itself miraculously"
No atheist or scientist as ever said anything close to that ,,,,,,YOU ARE LYING
You are the one that claims something came from nothing....GOD what or who created god......if you claim it always existed why not give the same allowance to the universe.
RedlineMMA 6 months ago
@Amritizcool66 Atheists make no such claim. It is theists who claim, "everything magically came from nothing and arranged itself miraculously."
TyheamRufac 5 months ago
cookies!
tovartalero 8 months ago
@oopscanada Thats Okay, our species has grown up to understand time scales in terms of our experience, same with distances, i think it was sagan that said the universe is not stranger than you imagine it may be stranger than you can imagine. that is to say our brains have trouble understanding concepts that seem to go against our experience. Look at an evolutionary timeline, its huge, its rediculous, we have only been around for a the flicker of a moment.
shandcunt 9 months ago
Thats not "the bottom line" of how it happened, it is a theory. I believe in evolution, but the specifics of how each link developed are totally up for speculation.
discord20 9 months ago
@oopscanada We have witnessed new species happening, you need an organism with a short enough life span that you can go through many generations in a short time but moths, butterflys, insects have been observed to change into a different species.
It's unfortunate that you think this way, the evidence is there and it is overwhelming, your already on the internet please go check for yourself. U will have a stronger position theologically if u stop denying facts about reality.
shandcunt 9 months ago
@shandcunt We have seen fruit flies mutate, and adapt to new "fruitflies". Here my question again: Where are the new species? And I'm talking about Macro evolution, not your simple adaptation of the specie to the environment. I'm not talking about changing colours. That's already taken care of in the genes, in the DNA or not? Just look around you, you don't new species of humans, just one specie in diff colours. So, why not be honest, and accept what has been observed: No evolution.
oopscanada 9 months ago
@oopscanada Evolution does not disprove god, the angelican church embrace sceintific knowledge as the explanation for HOW god did things.
I repeat, Evolution does not say anything about the existence or non existence of a god.
the question of Gods existence is not addressed by evolution
Evolution explains the origin of species and has been observed
It doesn't explain the origin of life and even if it did why can't you just say "Thats how god did it"
shandcunt 9 months ago
@shandcunt
I understand your point. That is, if Evolution happened, **and** God *is* the creator of all things, *then, God used evolution as a tool. Well, first of all, the 2nd part is true. God *is* the creator of all things. However, the first part *is* False, the evolution is *not* true. It is not true, because as a "nice" theory, has not been proven to be true. The records indicate there are *no* in between beings, they're all complete.
oopscanada 9 months ago
Furthermore, we do not see evolution happening at the moment. We see species "adapting" but we do not see, *****NEW****** species being formed from others. And I mean literally new. In addition, when scientists discover more and more how cells are organized, how the DNA, the R/NA, the protein molecules, the cell membrane, the cloning of them, etc, etc, etc, it turns out that evolution cannot explain how this was formed. All systems as we know them, are too complex to be derived by "CHANCE".
oopscanada 9 months ago
@oopscanada We cannot see new species being formed right now because it takes thousands maybe millions of generations and mutations to form a new specie. But some living organisms like viruses mutate quickly enough for us to observe their transformation. As we speak, the HIV virus is much more resistant to drogues than 30 years ago.
It's not complex to understand all this. Nature has more credibility than humans written history.
TheSimplePast 9 months ago
@TheSimplePast
I agree, we don't see new species being formed.
Yes, some living organism mutate. However, you cannot compare viruses to multicelular beings who "supposedly" change into new species. So, here is my question again: Where are the new species?
Where are the really new "animals"? Other than reptiles, mammals, amphibians, birds, fish, Where is the new species?
oopscanada 9 months ago
@TheSimplePast
Ok, let's start with the hypothesis, that it takes thousands of generations. In any case, we should see a generation in transition or not? We should the old species being changed or not? However, fossils found, just prove what we see now: Crabs are crabs, lobsters remain lobsters, sharks are sharks, reptiles are reptiles, fish are fish. Where are the transitions today? Why did they stop? Isn't this supposed to be an ongoing process? Where are the talking monkeys?
oopscanada 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you don't believe in evolution, you're an idiot.
JImmy4336 9 months ago
Evolutionists, like this ignorant guy of the TYT network, want to see a physical god, to believe there is a God. However, this makes no sense, as if God is spirit, and invisible, he is not a person that you can find in the clouds, that is ridiculous. Nobody wants to see a God, that will treat you like a puppet. However, God, has given you free will to choose to believe in him or not. If you don't believe in him, and are thankful, then you know the consequences. Well, too bad for you.
oopscanada 9 months ago
... however, up to today, man thinks. What a though is. Why we're able to reason, and come up with new ideas. This intelligence, which we do not see, is an invisible manifestation and a witness non-material things. If God exists, then, he manifests himself through creation, and through his words. The greeks, the egyptians, the romans, they wanted to see a God physically; so, they created images. That's what evolutionists want to do, they want to see God, but they cannot see hm.
oopscanada 9 months ago
@oopscanada Wait, you're accusing the others of making images when the whole bible is filled with them? The snake for example, or the tree of knowledge... When the bible says that god spoke to create stuff, that's an image STOLEN from the egyptians.
As long as you can't prove that non material things exist, your god will be a simple belief and nothing more, no matter what you say.
ivanlagrossemoule 9 months ago
@ivanlagrossemoule
I don't see your point. Non material things exist. Your thought is non-material. When people think, scientists can see their "sparks" interaction among the neurons, but thoughts themselves are non material. They cannot be extracted from somebody and stored in a jar. So, yes, non-material things exist. Furthermore, when man has built-in morals, and therefore, makes laws such as do not kill, then, this proves to you that this "matter" is more than organic material.
oopscanada 9 months ago
@oopscanada Here's an analogy to make things more simple. Is an image stored on a computer material or not?
ivanlagrossemoule 9 months ago
@ivanlagrossemoule
In image on a computer is stored as a series of bits, which have a value off/on, depending on the physical characteristic of the actual media being used. So, yes, it has a material representation. And you can take any hardware reader of the bits and recreate the image *at will*.
oopscanada 9 months ago
creationism FTW
pakuplue 10 months ago
@pakuplue Nah, it's a heritage of people trying to get people to believe them.
TheSimplePast 9 months ago
my only consolation with this, really, is that NOBODY in politics can EVER top the dumbest anti-evolution argument I've heard. I do quote here:
"at least the Bible makes sense. I mean, evolution tells me that if I leave a rock next to some water for a hundred years it'll turn into a person."
if you ever get to the time when a politician gets THAT stupid (Sarah Palin excused for probably already being past that point) you need to abandon the country immediately.
Stevie2Sxc 10 months ago
@Stevie2Sxc If you want to kick them out of your country, please don't send them to us xD
TheSimplePast 9 months ago
@TheSimplePast don't worry, we'll put them on an Arc and let it sail aimlessly around the Oceans of the world with 2 of every animal. seems fitting
Stevie2Sxc 9 months ago
@Stevie2Sxc Nice! love your humour :D!
TheSimplePast 9 months ago
I won't see how anyone still doubts evolution.
JImmy4336 10 months ago
Why was this really considered news? Why did these creatures HAVE to be OUR ancestors, and not an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT species?
truepridejb 11 months ago
@truepridejb its news because its important. If its another species that knows how to walk upright, like bigfoot, then gee, i guess that would be news too.
grendelee 10 months ago
@grendelee I'm sure there are a lot of undiscovered creatures on our planet. After all, they DID discover that bacteria that has arsenic as a component, which puts scientists in a tiff since everything on our planet that is living doesnt have arsenic as part of its makeup. Meaning life can exsist litterally anywhere now, since oxygen or an atmosphere is now irrelevant.
truepridejb 10 months ago
@truepridejb so bacteria is news....but not human ancestors?
grendelee 10 months ago
@truepridejb - or indeed why did these creatures HAVE to be an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT species and NOT OUR ancestors? I know - so it fits in with your bible. LOL
shumble32 9 months ago
you mucked that all up, but nice try
Farfromhere001 1 year ago
Lucy is a chimpanzee!!!!!!!!!!! That is a proven fact!!!!!!!!!!!!! The "missing links" are still missing. Ardi, is too incomplete to draw so much info from, it doesn't even have a freakin spine.
ZIONISTMAN1 1 year ago
Comment removed
fullMetaLxMantis 1 year ago
@ZIONISTMAN1
Yep, all of the so-called evidence is debunkable, they won't listen though.
rehzon 11 months ago
am not sayin you all are my brothers and shit no way. but thats how it startet and you can still find it in allmost everything who exist in our fuckin planet .dna compare is a proof . so we can fuck adam in his ass hole and stop callin him father...
skyepigen 1 year ago
stop all pls stop you wackness we all are related in one or another we all are from the the same thing who startet it. what ever a meteor or it just startet here its cuz of our planet we are here . animals or whatever fish or i dont know what .life is a thing who allways will mix or start as new or evovle . we all have dna to compare even micro things you cant even see but if its 0.000001% dna compare we still are related !
skyepigen 1 year ago
the depiction as to why we walk upright now despite being in the woods seems like a pretty gigantic leap, aren't there equally plausible alternative scenarios, like for example, better leverage, greater potential for being able to over power other animals; greater dexterity when moving through forests. Seems not only an over simplification but a big leap in reason. I'm not saying it's wrong but what other evidence gives this merit?
MuTaziliTajdid 1 year ago
Schoolhouse Rocks.
SinnFein4ever 1 year ago
wow evolution is such a CRAP mix in uranus! evolution isn't real at all. the skeleton could have been an actual skeleton of an old ape that may have had birth defects when born. geez people will do anythign to talk about this crap nowadays
theamazingtoot 1 year ago
@theamazingtoot
Lol sarcasm, it's amazing... :)
LanteanKnight 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@theamazingtoot " could have been an actual skeleton of an old ape that may have had birth defects when born. geez people will do anythign to talk about this crap nowadays "
Really? What is your scientific source for this observation?
wowamonn 1 year ago
this is interesting but aren't apes in their current form able to carry food...
toungetied98 1 year ago
@toungetied98
Yes, what's your point?
They have evolved too, it's not as if we're the only species that has been evolving over the last million years...
LanteanKnight 1 year ago
@LanteanKnight maybe I shouldn't of said "in their current form" Apes are able to carry food and we evolved from apes. So my point was that an Ape learning how to carry food to get a partner sounds pretty lame.
toungetied98 1 year ago
I'm gonna start bringing food to hot chicks now.
Chaaarge 1 year ago
@Chaaarge
We're only impressed if you can cook.
The more advanced a guy's cooking skills, the more impressed we are.
;)
SinnFein4ever 1 year ago
LOL yeah right...Im sure sure chefs all over the world are gettin laid like a rockstar
Abgef 1 year ago
Good video !
DraskyVanderhoff 1 year ago
OK, I am a BIG supporter of evolution. I debated a creationist just a few hours ago but this really sounds far fetched - two legs to be able to bring food? C'mon! wtf
Apes bring food and stuff as well as use tools while being quadruped. Now what?
sapunec7854 1 year ago
@sapunec7854 A 'supporter' of evolution?
It's not a side or a team or a cause, it's an observable fact.
MRaverz 1 year ago
@MRaverz LOL! Go & tell that to the creationists. I do know it is a fact, chill. It is just that the idea of having to bring food every once in a while infuencing evolution is rather silly and I wanted to say that without looking biased since no one would bother checking my account before answering something stupid about no evidence for Jesus or whatever.
sapunec7854 1 year ago
@sapunec7854 well, the misconception is that she went totally straight up as we are... You can simply carry your food with you which apes also do, true. But that just proves how close relatives we are.
WallieTF 1 year ago
evolution is not a theory it is a fact, gravity is not a theory also it is a fact.
TurkiyeCumhurbaskani 1 year ago
@TurkiyeCumhurbaskani
Well...the Theory explain the facts. So the Theory of Gravity explain why we see the facts of gravity, and so on.
daarco2 1 year ago
bit of advice, never say, "and that's the bottom line of how it happened." We don't know that. It's a tentative hypothesis, among several other tentative hypotheses.
ScientiaVeritasEtLux 1 year ago
That has got to be one of the dumbest fucking explanations I've ever heard. I suppose T-rex and Kangaroos also were just carrying food around for sex.
TheWhiteRabbit1990 1 year ago
@TheWhiteRabbit1990
No, they did't (T-Rexes "arms" were just too small, besides, they likely were scavengers... T-Rex carrying around some bits of partly rotten carcass?!... yak!) and they don't (kangoroos are herbivores and "bringing a bit of grass" makes no sense).
However explanation sucks a bit, I agree. Carrying food is important when female is pregnant or nursing babies, BEFORE that it's only needed to prove, that male is able to care for family, so explanation is a partial fail.
SwineNahNah 1 year ago
@SwineNahNah
wha....? You confused me.
TheWhiteRabbit1990 1 year ago
There's simply too many moronic theists spamming their bullshit while having made virtually no research into what evolution actually says. To fully know how evolution works, it would take years of knowledge to be taught from such fields as molecular biology, biochemistry, genetics, paleontology, physical chemistry, biophysics, inorganic chemistry, organic chemistry, cellular biology, and other related fields. Not only that, it's recommended that one go through years of research afterwards.
spicychickenwing31 1 year ago
@spicychickenwing31
Actually it does't take many years to cope with the basic idea of natural selection (if you don't go into detail how DNA's information is accumulated and then transformed into a living being), primitive logic is enough and that doesn't require any education, just a bit of common sense, but some* theists are simply too stupid to understand even basics.
* - Roman Catholic and most large Protestant churches officially approve evolution (not crazy enough to deny obvious 8D )
SwineNahNah 1 year ago
@SwineNahNah That's why I said "to fully know" how it works, it requires a lot of what I mentioned. I'm currently a grad student in the field of biochemistry (my secondary field being medicinal chemistry and natural product synthesis).
spicychickenwing31 1 year ago
evolution in a nutshell for the dumbasses:
there's a creature. it is born with a defect that makes it more susceptible to its environment. this defect makes the creature more able to survive and more sexually attractive, this creature is thus more likely to mate, thus the defect is passed on. small changes like this occur over time, thus a species changes. just like tree man, if his defect was beneficial to survival, he'd mate and thus we'd have tree people.
-it's common sense people
mikescott77 1 year ago
this guy is a giant cock.
DarkNewAges 1 year ago
I love how these guys think they're so smart and educated. So Adam and Eve is a stupid idea? Pure fantasy? You know what sounds like fantasy to me? Bacteria floating in a swamp which somehow became a fish. Then that fish somehow crawled to land and became a reptile. Then that reptile became a monkey. THEN, somehow that monkey grew into a person. That sounds like a pretty good fantasy too.
puppetmasterfiles 1 year ago
@puppetmasterfiles clearly you have no real understanding of evolution. First of all, bacteria didn't turn into fish, macro-evolution occurs over hundreds of millions of years. Secondly, fish didn't turn into reptiles, some evolved into amphibians first (check out the mudskipper which is an amphibian fish that uses it front fins to "walk" on land with), then after more hundreds of millions of years some of those evolved into reptiles. Finally, some reptiles evolved into mammals. To put it simply
Tobinius 1 year ago
@puppetmasterfiles Evolution is a fact. Micro-evolution happens all the time, how else could different variants of beasts be "created", such as various horses, dogs, cows, etc. Macro-evolution is the same thing, but occurring over vast vast time scales. Darwin's theory to explain how evolution works has survived over 150 years of vigorous scientific testing, including modern day genetics testing.
The "evidence" for Adam and Eve comes from copper age sheep herders. Sounds like fantasy to me.
Tobinius 1 year ago
@puppetmasterfiles evolution is a fact the last time i checked.
why can't i come to a video about science without religious morons spamming?
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
@puppetmasterfiles Your an idiot, enough said. Individuals dont evolve populations do. There is a gradual transition of things.
firaz7 1 year ago
Lmao just because you found a half human/half ape creature doesn't mean you evolved from it. What if it's an alien? 0_o What if it's just a creature who existed with our ancestors? What if it's another form of ape that was wiped out? So because you found an ape that kinda looks human that makes it your ancestor...?
puppetmasterfiles 1 year ago
@puppetmasterfiles Close analysis of bone structure.
firaz7 1 year ago
@puppetmasterfiles it would be really interesting if a species of ape evolved to be able to walk, died out, then a second species evolved walking a second time. Occum's razor suggests to me that we evolved from the walking ape 4 million years ago.
jojomcbean 1 year ago
denshaotoko89
He he; another blind atheist. Ridiculous.
oopscanada 1 year ago
Absolutely fascinating! Too bad anti-Evolution, Flat Earthers will never believe it- no matter much evidence is found. They're too busy searching for Noah's Ark while making sure not to fall off the edge of the Earth!
anitafh1 1 year ago
@2hottie69 moron
denshaotoko89 1 year ago
i think that chick was ovulating. i could smell it
denshaotoko89 1 year ago
Evolution hasn't found any missing links, we was created and our ancestors weren't ROCKS. You laughing when in fact u believe we came about from micro-organism which was form by the rainning of millions of years on rocks.???
5857612 1 year ago
@5857612
"Raining on rocks" That's a pretty ignorant statement, I mean; if you're going to insult a theory, at least be educated on the subject. Disrespectful and dishonest, on purpose or not. The truth, it took about a billion years for photosynthetic cells to appear and later evovle into; more capable cells which could split water (photosynthetsis), multi celluar, and eventually vertebrates appeared on land. It's more complex, but you're a dumbass.
christmasdnc 1 year ago 2
@christmasdnc the further you go back on the evolution thing the more ridiculous it look. Prob just as ridiculus you might find that some people believe that God who have no beginning or end created all this. Furthermore i was using simple terms because you do beleive we came from raning for billions years on rocks. How did the photosynthetic cells form or came from? rocks and rain.
5857612 1 year ago
@5857612
The theory of Evolution and the theory of the Big Bang are separate ideas; I ask again; how educated on the subject are you? You say "What about the elements, did they evolve too, or are did they come from the big bang? Did carbon evolve to helium? It just doesn't make sense" That's got to be one of the silliest questions I've ever heard. You don't even know the dif between one theory and another... these subjects are much too mass to explain to someone as ignorant as you.
christmasdnc 1 year ago 37
@christmasdnc Another way to discredit the junk science of YEC Hovindism...Stellar Evolution & Stellar nucleosynthesis
biancademonet 1 year ago
@christmasdnc If anyone was wondering how to create carbon, well that requires hydrogen, then fusion, and perhaps a few supernovas under the right conditions.
mit871chell 1 year ago
@christmasdnc NICE EPEEN MATE, YOUR OBVIOUSLY RELIGIOUS OR YOU WOULDNT GIVE A SHIT, AND YES MY CAPS LOCK IS BROKEN.
Gn00bie 11 months ago
@christmasdnc furthermore what about the elements? did they evolve too. or they just came from the big bang? did carbon evolve to helium? It just doesnt make sense. Hope you come to the truth...
5857612 1 year ago
lmao! these early woman/apes are pretty smart if you ask me, I have sex with both men one the alpha male so my babies will be strong and the other male will think that hes the father and he brings me lots of food so ill keep him around :D hehe she like a goldigger of the past or the original goldigger :) way to hand it to ardi she was rather smart for being a early human!
patsybob 1 year ago
thats bullshit
MrOwen1992 1 year ago
TYT ; ha ha; your greatly announced found ancestor; resulted in not being what scientists thought; he he;
oopscanada 1 year ago
What evolution!?... They never taught that crap back in my school days... Speaking of which that Jebus Bible nonsense is full of it also...
I'm quite frankly starting to call into question the "existence" of this whole "internets" thingamabob also...
And as for this YouTube video... What is this I don't even...?
SurgicalZeal 1 year ago
Some people are still kids. Hey, I wonder after so many years, evolution has not found a fix for terminal diseases. They are bad for a population, and they still get inherited. Hum....
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada Really? Your argument against the existence of evolution is that there are still genetic diseases? Many genetic diseases do not become fatal until after puberty, by which time they may have been passed to the next generation. Many others are developed because both parents have an allele, one copy of which did not make them sick. However if the offspring inherits two copies of that same allele, they develop the disease. DNA is so complex that it makes mistakes from time to time.
anscibecca86 1 year ago
@anscibecca86 I'm just trying to find the logic here. Evolution gets rid of a tail and supposedly make apes erect to deal with new environment conditions, food availability, and threats. But, it cannot get rid, after hundreds, thousands or millions of years of genetic mutations that give rise to congenital/genetic weaknesses or diseases? Sorry; I don't see the logic there.
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada It's because most genetic weaknesses are recessive. Carriers are generally not selected against, and sometimes are even selected for (classic example being sickle cell anemia). Pretty much every person, even if they are completely healthy, is a carrier for a handful of recessive diseases. They have no impact on the carriers' fitness. But if two carriers of the same disease have a child together, there is a chance they could inherit two mutated alleles, and thus have the full disease.
yamshie 11 months ago
@yamshie; Sure; no problem. There is nothing wrong with genetics theories.
oopscanada 11 months ago
@oopscanada Also, would you rather admit that evolution created mistakes in DNA coding or that God did? Many monotheists, including Christians, like to claim that God doesn't make mistakes. With all the mistakes in our bodies and in the eco-system, that would tend to show that either God made mistakes or that they happened because of spontaneous mutations and genetic damage caused by inflammation in cells and radiation which were passed on to the next generation.
anscibecca86 1 year ago
@anscibecca86-- well obviously, if you want to understand God, and how/why he allows diseases to enter the world, then, you won't find it in Darwinists forums. However, if you proposing that DNA mistakes are the causes of genetical diseases, I can't argue with you on that. DNA has the potential to make mistakes of course. Sorry, I don't understand your point.
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada I suppose my point wasn't so much that genetic disease was a proof for evolution as that it definitely isn't a proof for creationism.
anscibecca86 1 year ago
Who says that the Bible is a "historical" book?
Anyway; you guys get upset easily when illusions like "Ardi" are found to be yet, another failed attempt to prove evolution of apes into humans. Anyway; as somebody said, you can't make an evolutionist think. You have to find the answers on your own.
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada Have you ever read Darwin's book? If you have you would know that Darwin never said that we evolved from apes.
FURepublicans 1 year ago
@FURepublicans - hey listen; I read that book so long, long ago, that I forget the details. If humans did not have a common ancestor, according to Darwin that it was Ape-like, then what was it? At no point I quoted Darwin, just to pointing out what most science school books draw in their pages, when they describe evolution: a series of Ape-like creatures, followed by human-like creatures, finally, "suddenly" followed by a man. Nice imagination, of course; keep up the good work?
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada OK, next time you get sick! DON"T go to the doctor! get cured on your own! or pray to your imaginary friend!
donnomar 1 year ago
@oopscanada
moron.
denshaotoko89 1 year ago
Exactly, a fact is verifiable evidence. Bones that have been found to be a hoax, or *not the oldest ancestor of humans", as TYT in this video,pretend to announce, is *NOT* a fact.
200 Transitions? really? A collection of ape bones, found in different parts of Africa and Europe cannot account for a transition. Evolutionary processes, as proposed cannot provide an explanation of the jump from lizard to ape to human. Only evolutionists believe this fantasy. Why don't you find the real truth?
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada yeah the real truth, the most historically accurate book ever written...
THE BIBLE
*cue parting clouds and angelic chorus*
take your fundamentalist hand outta your ass and go pray or some shit.
mustangrun173 1 year ago
I did not say the origin of life. That would be abiogenesis. Although it's well known that life did not come up out of emptyness. It was formed by a designer.
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada
"Although it's well known that life did not come up out of emptyness."
Not even the most staunch atheist makes the assertion that life appeared from nothing.
"It was formed by a designer."
Intelligent Design still doesn't have an active scientific theory, and every single piece of evidence it has posited has proven to be inconclusive, or flat out wrong. There's absolutely no tangible reason to assume that life on this planet was designed by anything other than Natural Selection.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 1 year ago
Actually, evolution is not a fact. A fact is evidence by itself. Fossils of old animals are not an evidence of evolution. Evolution tries to explain the origin of species; however, the explanation falls short, as to show an evolution, you have to show the sequence. Yet, to explain a sequence, we are told, ".. and millions of years later, from the ape, there appear man"; sorry; that's quite a stretch.
So, excuses are found, such as this "oldest human ancestor", and it's found to be not it.
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada "Evolution tries to explain the origin of species" Nope, that's abiogenesis. Evolution explains the diversity in animals
doctaword 1 year ago 17
@doctaword No, I think oopscanada was right. Evolutionary theory explains the origin of species. If he'd said, "the origin of LIFE" then I would have corrected him that abiogenesis tries to explain that.
ScientiaVeritasEtLux 1 year ago
@doctaword Diversity in animals is also known as Species. Thats why Charles Darwin's book is called "On the origin of species." Abiogenesis is more like "On the origin of life"
Totaltwist 1 year ago
@Totaltwist touche
doctaword 1 year ago
@doctaword stupid
ultimate8pac 1 year ago
@doctaword If I'm not mistaken the theory of evolution actually does explain the origin of species, and therefor the diversity in animals. Abiogenesis is a theory explaining the origin of life in general.
Blazeyes123 11 months ago 13
@Blazeyes123 Touche
doctaword 11 months ago
@Blazeyes123 YA YA :-P
vinayoo 5 months ago
@doctaword Nope; I think you got it wrong too. Abiogenesis tries to explain the origin of life. Assuming that life came about "on its own" (boy, you have to have blind faith for this), then, the idol of all atheist, Charles, introduces evolution in his book published in 1859 under the title "On the Origin of Species.". I don't mind if you can go ahead and correct Charlie for his mistake then.
oopscanada 11 months ago
@oopscanada - and of course you don't need 'blind faith' to believe the theory about bearded old man living in the clouds who loves us SO MUCH - but can't handle rejection so will torture us for eternity if we don't do what HIS priests tell us to do.
shumble32 9 months ago
@shumble32
Don't confuse Zeus with The Lord, and only God. Your pagan rituals from your ancestors turned out to be an abomination, and the mount Olympus turned out to be a regular mountain, with no gods. In any case, believing in God, does not involve theories. You're very wrong there. Believing in God, means believing in a spiritual life, that has nothing to do with atoms, elements, or matter. The moral character, the intelligence, they all have physical manifestations, however
oopscanada 9 months ago
@oopscanada Your story of The Lord isn't actually a perfect tale either.. Bible is a really poor source of information because it's not an antique historical source.. Many people changed it through history and many things were added that were not in the original source, even adding some Greek folklore elements in.
It's just not reliable source of information..
TheSimplePast 9 months ago
@TheSimplePast
I agree that there have been mistakes in the translations. But, that only proves one thing: There were originals. If these originals talked about supposedly "tales" about the Ark of Noah, which many of you like to laugh about, why then, the "exactly same story" is told by the Mayans in a book called the Popol-Vuh? Why, if the Mayans are on another continent tell exactly the same story *way before* the Spaniards came to America? Unless it was true? Andy they're descendants?
oopscanada 9 months ago
@oopscanada
" A fact is evidence by itself."
No, a fact is either verified information, or a provable concept.
"we are told, ".. and millions of years later, from the ape, there appear man"; sorry; that's quite a stretch."
Then why didn't you actually research the sequence? There's over 200 transitions between lesser apes and modern homo sapiens.
Yes, evolution is a fact, and the only people who make the assertion that its not are those who haven't actually researched this vast topic.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 1 year ago
@oopscanada
Also, the mountain of Genetic evidence for evolution was more than Darwin or Mendel could have ever dreamed. Fossil evidence is only a small part of the vast amount of facts supporting the theory.
I've found that the only people who actually disregard evolution as "Just a theory" or "Not a fact" are those who don't actually understand the subject.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 1 year ago
@2hottie69 The bible says it's ok to kill your daughter if she isn't a virgin on her wedding. So would you say that is also true?
Oh by the way your religions first creation myth didn't involve Eve.
Lets not even start about slavery.
ronin241703 1 year ago
@2hottie69 If you can't see that your last sentence is not an argument, there's really no point in talking any further.
costasra 1 year ago
Oh boy. This tyt has to eat his words now. Ardy hArdly qualifoes as an ancestor to humans. Ha ha. In Times magazine article, Ardi: The Human Ancestor Who Wasn't?
the famous missing link has been downgraded to monkey status. So far for a hope to prove evolution of species.
oopscanada 1 year ago
@oopscanada The point of this isn't to prove evolution. Evolution is a fact. We know based on fossils, skeletons, etc...that species have evolved. What this is discussing is how relevant Ardi is to understanding human origins.
Viperplayer187 1 year ago
yawn. this has already been debunked.
kobasica 1 year ago
intellectually speaking... religious people still walks in 4 legs!
neoflyboy 1 year ago
I have to say, of all the impacting theories I heard here - the last 10 seconds were the best :)
DuskRenegade 1 year ago
@ creationists:
GAME OVER man....game over
Abgef 1 year ago
It's kinda hard to swallow a theory which has no real evidence, just a bunch of skeletal fragments from apes possibly mixed in with human bones, with no footage of the arduous digging and compare and contrast. There is also the fossil dating that is said to be flawed but we still consider to be somewhat accurate. And if we are 200,000yrs old then where is this speciation creature that is at the edge of being human? and according to "fossil record" there is no consistency. when will we evolve?
pokemonsavage 1 year ago
Technically our next big evolution should be near if you consider the state of the world. We overpopulated and most of our ressources are gone, only the fittest will survive the coming chaos, if any survives.
Also the universe and time may be cyclic, thus removing the need of a creator.
Atharkas 1 year ago
We know nothing about our history, yet we refrute the Bible which gives us a breakdown of how we came to be and the end. Yes the Bible is almost like other religions and ancient civilized writings, but these similarities weren't related nor translatable for ages after the Bible was written. According to the Bible time didn't exist until after God fashioned the universe and created light(what we measure time with). Which means we cant really know when the Universe was really created.
pokemonsavage 1 year ago