ok the car is beautifully designed, great on road and as capable as a .....a regular car.. in car this size better angles could be easily achieved without spoiling its design, and for the price tag I think ppl deserve also to have a low gear diferential locks and 50 mm more of ground clearance..... why buy something expensive that was made just to look at it
Having this vehicle, I can tell you I am actually not that comfortable using it as I would be using, say a Mercedes ML because I have had one of them before.
This is a great looking vehicle but please, why bother with this 'off road' nonsense? I'm all for getting out and having fun in whatever you drive, but if you need spotters on a gravel road just to avoid freaking BODY DAMAGE you are out of your element.
This is a great vehicle and certainly with its merits but PLEASE enough with this off road nonsense!
Next up, off road review of the 2012 Mustang. With its solid axle rear end it makes a great rock crawler, am I right???
shouldn't there be air suspension adjustment like the previous range rovers? Least a little more ground clearence. If they do want an off roader make a separate tier for that with all those upgrades that everyone wants. ( off road parts etc.)
These things are so poor off road they need to be spotted through areas a golf cart could drive over! I think my nieces' Power Wheel Barbie Jeep is more capable off road than this thing. THis is disgusting. Maybe the yuppie elite can believe this is a true 4x4 capable vehicle, but LR isn't fooling the regular populous.
This is pathetic. RR has lost its true pedigree. There is nothing that this CAR is doing that other brands equipped with AWD or 4WD can't do. Save your money and buy a Jeep Cherokee, can be equipped to be just as luxurious AND is more capable off the road than this poor excuse for a rover. Land Rover needs to wake up and get back to their roots!
Most of these land rover owners hardly go off roading, They're too nice and way too expensive to take off roading. Most are for city driving. I own a pathfinder and I've never taken it off roading. Maybe driven on snow and snowy hills to a skiing resort. lol
this is a great thing, is a big car, perfect for city, and nice for some off road, if you want more, get a super charge or a sport, or a discovery or a defender, or even a free lander, but this looks just superb!
Let's face it: Evoque is NOT off-road vehicle. It's fancy, very good looking...or better woooow looking 4wd street car. It has some fancy off-road candies, electronic-based, but there's no good of it when its chasis or spoiler stratches every rock on the way.
Approach angle is catastrophic, and so is the arm travel - 5-7 inches at the best? Sorry RR, but calling such a car an off-roader is somewhere between catastrophe and sabotage.
I know it's a range rover and they were always meant to be offroad, but let us be real 90% of the owners never leave pavement. So I'll give you props on actually using these SUV's, but I would not need 4wd on these conditions you tested on.
At 2:56 its really a shame that its struggling so much to cross that angle. Its not a difficult manoeuvre at all. Even a freelancer would ve managed it better. The approach angle of the RR Evoque is pathetic.
a prius could do that dear god
clarke8554 2 days ago
ok the car is beautifully designed, great on road and as capable as a .....a regular car.. in car this size better angles could be easily achieved without spoiling its design, and for the price tag I think ppl deserve also to have a low gear diferential locks and 50 mm more of ground clearance..... why buy something expensive that was made just to look at it
2050Wheels 5 days ago
Having this vehicle, I can tell you I am actually not that comfortable using it as I would be using, say a Mercedes ML because I have had one of them before.
8150shaf 6 days ago
nonononono slowly,dont scratch it..
jzy0104 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A Lexus would be way better at this
123Jato 1 week ago
A camry could do this shit...
onoff314 3 weeks ago
this is not a off road, not even close.......
ztinny1990 3 weeks ago
Chuck Norris = Evoque
fmflores2000 3 weeks ago
careful
dont dent it
dont scratch it
dont get mud on it
whats the point off roading in this? its clearly not for off road?!
hoffman4506 3 weeks ago
the gok wan of 4x4s
hoffman4506 3 weeks ago
omg ... that not off road , its a joke
wmanzare 4 weeks ago
lol it needs 3" more lift and off road tires. or just get a jeep . you would go alot faster
wmanzare 4 weeks ago
city 4x4
Richona 1 month ago
Получилась гламурная фигня. Совсем испортился ЛенРовер. Жаль...
Werwolfalex 1 month ago
this car doesnt belong off road
31reggiemiller1 1 month ago
A Jeep Wrangler would be much better then this thing.
1999skibum 1 month ago
The newest Wrangler is a shame for the name!
grabael 1 month ago
This is a great looking vehicle but please, why bother with this 'off road' nonsense? I'm all for getting out and having fun in whatever you drive, but if you need spotters on a gravel road just to avoid freaking BODY DAMAGE you are out of your element.
This is a great vehicle and certainly with its merits but PLEASE enough with this off road nonsense!
Next up, off road review of the 2012 Mustang. With its solid axle rear end it makes a great rock crawler, am I right???
JLH2Hummer 1 month ago
shouldn't there be air suspension adjustment like the previous range rovers? Least a little more ground clearence. If they do want an off roader make a separate tier for that with all those upgrades that everyone wants. ( off road parts etc.)
deltasworder1x 1 month ago
beautiful car... but not for offroading
1agoa 1 month ago
These things are so poor off road they need to be spotted through areas a golf cart could drive over! I think my nieces' Power Wheel Barbie Jeep is more capable off road than this thing. THis is disgusting. Maybe the yuppie elite can believe this is a true 4x4 capable vehicle, but LR isn't fooling the regular populous.
domeslacker 1 month ago
This is pathetic. RR has lost its true pedigree. There is nothing that this CAR is doing that other brands equipped with AWD or 4WD can't do. Save your money and buy a Jeep Cherokee, can be equipped to be just as luxurious AND is more capable off the road than this poor excuse for a rover. Land Rover needs to wake up and get back to their roots!
domeslacker 1 month ago
I´ll prefer Pure version: the front bumper allows more ground clearance and better angle of attack!
PS: Cheaper too :D
ricardoinacio 1 month ago
@ricardoinacio Me too!
DJRoidon777 2 weeks ago
Most of these land rover owners hardly go off roading, They're too nice and way too expensive to take off roading. Most are for city driving. I own a pathfinder and I've never taken it off roading. Maybe driven on snow and snowy hills to a skiing resort. lol
momay69 1 month ago
this is a great thing, is a big car, perfect for city, and nice for some off road, if you want more, get a super charge or a sport, or a discovery or a defender, or even a free lander, but this looks just superb!
TheSantiayo 1 month ago
Let's face it: Evoque is NOT off-road vehicle. It's fancy, very good looking...or better woooow looking 4wd street car. It has some fancy off-road candies, electronic-based, but there's no good of it when its chasis or spoiler stratches every rock on the way.
Approach angle is catastrophic, and so is the arm travel - 5-7 inches at the best? Sorry RR, but calling such a car an off-roader is somewhere between catastrophe and sabotage.
Labsyboy 2 months ago
Is this some sort of joke? Off roading this is not.
pantysaer 2 months ago
I know it's a range rover and they were always meant to be offroad, but let us be real 90% of the owners never leave pavement. So I'll give you props on actually using these SUV's, but I would not need 4wd on these conditions you tested on.
Robiej56 2 months ago
my boss's wife bought it ........... and they are not happy with evoque
rajatpangtey 2 months ago
@rajatpangtey why?
bbsen 2 months ago
@rajatpangtey Why?
lexlex2007 1 month ago in playlist lista 3
Wheres the off road part ? 4wd is not really needed for these conditions. I wanted to see how the diff locks work and whatnot..
pizzapingvin 2 months ago
Comment removed
pizzapingvin 2 months ago
you guys just cant do an offroad track with these tires
joaoo390 2 months ago
this shit's worse than my mother's Rav
kingedoftheworld 2 months ago
At 2:56 its really a shame that its struggling so much to cross that angle. Its not a difficult manoeuvre at all. Even a freelancer would ve managed it better. The approach angle of the RR Evoque is pathetic.
DJRoidon777 3 months ago
pick up a ford edge same care almost half the price.
billnill123 3 months ago
so how many people i need to be able to drive safely on an off road terain?
magiccaloy1972 3 months ago
they should have airbag suspension to raise them like like the land rovers. Also the front end is entirely too loo to have a good approach angle.
acer1827 4 months ago
they should have airbag suspension to raise them like like the land rovers
acer1827 4 months ago
@acer1827 Agreed
ReelHeavyFilm 2 months ago
My Parents Astro could do this course.
Rogue284 4 months ago
Not impressive!
ydafylsa 4 months ago
Going offroad with low profile 20"s is like climbing the Everst with slippers. Amazing vehicle by the way.
Desus80 4 months ago
i love this car the best of the best
juliojng 4 months ago
Well this video proofed that the evoque is not suited for soft-core offroad.
Toyokunari 4 months ago
"Terrain Response" scusate l'errore!
trenboy79 4 months ago
Buono il Responce terrain, ma troppo bassa, sopratutto è poco il 26% di angolo d'attacco anteriore!
trenboy79 4 months ago
evoque is not off road car
sametturkmen87 4 months ago
Lets be honest. this is no off roader with that low ground clearance and tires. This is just embarrassing. The Evoque is built for paved roads.
igeekone 4 months ago in playlist More videos from AutoNetwork
Nothing impressive here.
eiggerris 4 months ago
Loool! This is pathetic. Why would you ever take that off road with such a low clearance. And get some proper mud tires, too
santamon12 4 months ago
you can do the same thing in any modern day small size suv, you dont need this car to do it lol,
arashn89 4 months ago
I don't think the wheels are suppose to lock up that much...lol but great vid
ltrebl 4 months ago
Comment removed
itsamac 4 months ago