Note: Chief Justice Scalia mentions he has had many times when he did not like his ruling but the "statute" demanded such. They are bound by "statutes" OR they are bound by "laws" notice they each mention rules by both names. That is because you can enter the Supreme court under common law or statutory law. The judges decisions will be swayed by which "court" they are in. Find more on this on You Tube under Gordon Hall, Dean Clifford and Tim Turner. Constitutional law vs common or sovereign law.
Breyer seems to think that it's okay to inject your personal (subjective) opinions in rulings as long as you say it or write it down (disclosure) in the ruling...NONSENSE !
Note: Chief Justice Scalia mentions he has had many times when he did not like his ruling but the "statute" demanded such. They are bound by "statutes" OR they are bound by "laws" notice they each mention rules by both names. That is because you can enter the Supreme court under common law or statutory law. The judges decisions will be swayed by which "court" they are in. Find more on this on You Tube under Gordon Hall, Dean Clifford and Tim Turner. Constitutional law vs common or sovereign law.
tonyfreire702 1 week ago
Breyer seems to think that it's okay to inject your personal (subjective) opinions in rulings as long as you say it or write it down (disclosure) in the ruling...NONSENSE !
jamo387 2 weeks ago
Breyer should have stuck to ice cream.
jamo387 2 weeks ago
Great debate--I would love to have either of their legal minds.
hawkeyery 11 months ago