NSX vs WS6
0:52
Added: 4 years ago
From: ARFNSX
Views: 202,035
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (911)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lt1 ws6.

    

  • chase car is a rx7

  • @lilmarv08 Corvette C6 500whp

  • The NSX looks 10 times better than the pontiac

  • i had a 1997 trans am ws6 with a ls1 and i got stomped by a nsx there fucking fast lol

  • @freeballapimpin you mean lt1?

  • Lol. Thats the old timey WS6. Put it up against an LS1 and see what happens.

  • @reverb478 ..the NSX is a V6...still outruns this small block V8 sold as an "import killer"...lmao...

  • Im sorry but what a hideously ugly car that pontiac is next to that beautiful NSX.

  • @whygodrums10 well everybody isn't a millionaire and can afford exotic sports cars. We've got to make do with what we've got.

  • @reverb478

    yeah lol. That's why I got a 3000gt good looking car for cheap and pretty fast.

  • have the camera in the car

  • ls1 woulda yanked that bitch

  • Gay freeway roll. Too gay...

  • another funeral...

  • Oh come on the nsx its just too much for this guys

  • Lt1's suk ass, ls1 rule

  • NSX = underrated. Always hated because of the 270/290 HP V6.

    Muscle cars= overrated. V8s have become so godlike, it's always wrongly revered as the absolute fastest thing in existence.

  • @primalfear312 NSXs arent hated, its a highly respectable car by real car enthusiasts everywhere, as is the corvette and Trans am. They're all performance sportscars that can be built into beasts. and those arent muscle cars, muscle cars went out of production in the late 70s early 80s

  • would you be callin a corvette a piece of shit to cus the ws6 has the same ls1 engine

  • hondaaaaa

  • I'd WAY rather the NSX over the POS WS6. Not even a close call between 'em.

  • nsx is supersport class, designed to compete with ferrari. dont under estimate it.

  • we all can see which one looks better. Whisky Tango piece of shit

  • nsx vs piz o shit

  • Ha ha ha! Pwned by a Honda V6. Ha HA. I thought domestic muscle was the bomb? Push-rod piece of shit

  • really really its a nsx not a civic not a s2k or teggy come on ws6 go kill yourself your out classed

  • RUMBLE WIND VSSSHHHH RUMBLE WIND VSSSHHHHH RUMBLE WIND VSSSHHHHHH RUMBLE WIND WIND WIND WIND WIND RUMBLE WIND

  • The camera guy kept up.....what kinda car was he riding in?

  • NSX = very underrated car.

    Anyway, the USDM NSXs weighed too damn much for the power... 3100 for only 270? Even with 290, still overweight for the power and type of car (track car).

    The JDMs were the REAL NSXs, they were like 2800 lbs or so, at most 2900. Just import one of those and see if people will still call it "underpowered" after it surprises them! :-)

  • @chuckmekere 200 pounds doesnt make a drastic diff bro lol

  • Roll up the damn window next time please.

  • The NSX is the only good honda

  • lt1 no one cares

  • This doesn't even look like a race. Who starts a race at 70 mph?

  • expensive vs not expensive, lol

  • come check out my NSX on my channel "Cruising Atlanta"

  • Xyzdorky66: its an lt1 look at the front end, the guy only has honeycomb tail lights.

  • @Eldientesdechivo Good call!! Big difference if it were an ls1 car. I think it would have been a totally different outcome.

  • honestly if i could have a nsx for the price i paid for my t/a i would of gotten it but i dont think theres any nsx's for 8000

  • Wow suprising considering the powerplant and aftermarket supply for NSX motors isnt that great. Great platform though, suspension, wheelbase and all that.

  • @Narutimate97 its an LT1

    

  • Comment removed

  • @Narutimate97 Bro my buddy was on my ass in a fuckin 4 banger acura TSX and I was in a 01 automatic firebird The way those things are geared they kinda suck at high speeds trust me my 99 z-28 couldnt even outrun my boys 4.3 liter clk430 on the highway which is a heavier car with a smaller engine.

  • @Narutimate97 No more than I/H/E on the NSX. 275whp and 200tq at the time of this video

  • wooahhh!! trans am's are the true exotics!

  • DAMN I LOVE VIDS OF WIND NOISE!!!

  • It's funny that everyone gives Honda the credit for vvt when it was Nissan that actually first put it on the market with the vg30det engine. Well they were the first electronically controlled vvt. Before that it was fiat and porsche that put it out. Honda just took an idea and ran with it.

  • @abanda04

    Nah, you're wrong. Honda just made it easier to say. VTEC. Who the hell wants to say VVL? LOL

  • @abanda04 Honda took that idea and made it work the right way. the vg30det engines are know where near as reliable as the redesigned honda valve train in the vtec engine. But I will nissan credit for the idea.

  • I've drove import, and have never been impressed. My opinion is not bias it's based on driving experience. No matter what what anyone on this site says spending more money for overall less is nothing to brag or be happy about. If you want to drive a truly amazing overall driving experience. Drive a corvette zo6 for them money there is absolutely no comparison.

  • The thing everyone here is TRYING to over look is price. The nsx is a much more expensive car. The equivalent car for the price would be a corvette which would totally dominate this car in every aspect. I have a TA and I have 16 thousand total in mine, and it generates 520 to the wheels, and will out handle this nsx in any aspect since I have full after market suspension. And guess what I have a fraction on the money in mine! Those who say import is king have never drove American muscle.

  • the nsx is a superior car in every aspect... no comparison.

  • v8 ppl get defensive bout there cars haha who cares

  • maybe next time you could leave the camera inside the car!!!!!!!! retard holding the camera outside the window at 100MPH

  • @steve0sLs1 It was a girl filming for the first time. She didnt know

  • @rdvalla

    Don't forget that same muscle now sits in garbage used car lots across the country. find me an nsx at some dive on the side of the road selling cars...

  • ws6 is a ram air hood that looks like a basic trans am with fake ass hood on it most likely a lt1 not a ls1

  • 24 people must own muscles....face it guys imports are the kings when it comes to racing

  • time to sell my 87 crx and get me an nsx

  • Funny I thought the TA looked like ass. I'll take the NSX. It was designed to do more than drag racing. Road course the TA wouldn't even hang with the NSX.

  • That's a cast iron lt1. Like 235 to the wheels and a heavier car. I'm sorry but to you import guys vtec does suck! Why spend 50 thousand on a piece of shit Honda when you can buy an American muscle car for under half the price spend a couple thousand and have a car that will dominate the street, and look much better doing it. I don't care what you say, in the end American muscle will always prevail.

  • @rdvalla okay. 50 grand? u crazy.. a 1991-1999 nsx is roughtly 25k-35k a 2000-2004 NSX is gonna be 35k-60k depending on mileage, but in other words.. gets u a SUPER fast road race car straight from the manufacture, SUPER LIGHT car... aerodynamics of a super car, roughly 300hp with a ecu flash, suspension from the factory is great, brembos, a race car with the luxury of a exotic... now lets compare that ws6... 10k-15k... lt1... 3600lbs.. oh and u said vtec sucks? vtec is what made todays cars..

  • @rdvalla im not a fan boy of any type of car, but you can go ask any engineer. honda was known for his good flowing heads, and vtec, honda changed the way engines were made. look at the new Ford mustang.. what does it have now.. oh thats right variable valve timing. influenced by honda. toyota vvt-i. influenced by honda, mitsubishi, MIVEC, influenced by honda. etc.. i will agree nothing beats torque of the line. but comparing TWO cars based on a 40mph roll to 120mph yeah thats a PUSSY way

  • @rdvalla Drag racing sucks period. All it shows is how fast a car can go from a dead stop in a straight line. Muscle cars are great for destroying tires, but they suck at cornering. The NSX is underated plane and simple.

  • The NSX-T in this video might be a turbo. The 2000 NSXes have 290.

    Also, the only reason the NSX-Targa can't do 0-60 faster than 4.8 because it is exactly that- a "Targa".

    But the NA2 Coupes (Hardtops) do 4.5 cuz they're a LOT lighter.

  • @chuckmekere At the time of this video, the NSX was only I/H/E. Two years later I turbo'ed the car

  • @ARFNSX Hey dude love the work you've put into the NSX. I met u bout 2 years back in Texas u had just finished making a cross country run to Vegas and u still hadn't turboed it you and ur buddy told me to look up this race nice run bro! Keep up the good work bro take it easy!

  • @Mr2002ws6 Dude, I remember you! We were on our way back from the Gumball. I am off to Florida this weekend for some more airfield racing...stay tuned!

  • Chase car looks like a Vette.

  • LT-1 was a torque motor not so much up top like the LS-1 run that against a 99 or better Trans-AM and the outcome would be different.

  • yeah NSX !!!

  • wat can u say about vtec now?

  • @JDMass617 vtec kicked in yo

  • @drkatonac mother fuck im sick of youtube idiot comments, im not reading comments anymore heh

  • bro your full of shit your slow ass coblat will never walk on an nsx unless he isnt racing you and you are

  • i love how my cobalt can beat a NSX with no problem, but a ws6 can walk me. hmmmmmmmmmmm something isnt right

  • I love how the nsx always gives the other racer a good feeling of wining and just bitch slaps it at the end

  • @Jesse776100 turbo lag: the worst/ most entertaining problem with turbo cars ;D

  • @Qball914 wait are you implying the nsx is turbo? Because it's generally not, it's a naturally aspirated v-6 that makes 276hp, but revs to like 8 grand or something. Don't often see a turbo nsx. On another note, I'm slightly surprised at this result due to the straight line nature of this race, but I guess the lt1 seems to explain that. God I want an nsx.

  • @Qball914 ON second thought if this is the same nsx as another video by the same user it is turbo, which would make it definitively faster than an lt1 with only bolt ons, I am not surprised at all hahaha.

  • @Jesse776100 In the end the NSX driver is the one who got bitch slapped for paying as much as they did for a poor performance car.

  • @Jesse776100 agreed. and plus all nsx racers know how to drive their cars they dominate all

  • Ive test driven one of these, its a 97 TA ws6 and its probably auto. LT1

  • If it was an LS1 the TA would have won. LT1's are a bit slower.

  • @Sasunarulove Right. and i would say a lot slower based on my encounters.

  • @KnoesAll mid 14 sec cars compaired to low 13 sec cars, so ya.

  • @starr101010 sorry to break it to u but its not an ls1 look at the front of the car that's only on the 93 to 97 model

  • I like this NSX actually met the owner of this vehicle cool guy. Such a shame the WS6 had to loose but it's not an ls1 it's an lt1. Still good video keep up the good work!

  • @Mr2002ws6 nah buddy its an ls1

  • @starr101010 Thats a LT1 not a LS1.

  • @KnoesAll ls1

    

  • @KnoesAll lol nvm my bad it is i seen the hood its an lt1

  • @oAToMiCx

    yea, not too easy to spot because the tail lights are actually upgraded from a newer LS1.

  • Well Im not a chevy man but stock for stock the WS6 should be faster in that year. NSX's werent barn burners, they looked sweet but... however with a few mods NSX's were fast.

  • lol...fucking redneck actually thought he had a chance

  • No wonder he lost, is his hat over his eyes? rofl

  • ahh.... the beautiful sound of.... AIR!!!! wtf?

  • nice ass nsx

  • lt1's are far from the best lol.. They actually lack modern technology, they have a horrible ignition system thats mounted behind the waterpump so everytime the dist. has be changed you gotta pull hella shit. Thats the only major flaw for the iron block lt1, they take abuse there just not very powerful.

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT All my mods took less than 30 mins and total under $2k, so I call my car stock and it puts out 132hp per liter;) times 3.2 liters is the very conservative 425hp:) SRT rules!

  • @XfireBlake LOL I put down over 450 with just cams and DBB50trim so I guess I made 220ish per liter with less then 2k thats including tuned with the SRT.. But this isnt a compeition, I know a guy who has 2 twin turbo'd nsx's putting down around 688 to the wheels. I never said they couldnt make power, what I said was that they are an expensive platform to start with. Beatiful cars, but it stock there not very impressive. This is a lt1 which is good for really high 13's...

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT I raced an SRT 4 at the track a few weeks ago, He had a 50 trim (what ever that is) heavy mods, tune, straigt headers through a cut out and upgraded heat exchanges, etc. It was I don't know what was louder, the exhaust or the blow off;) It had Drag Radials to my Hankook Ventus tires and I beat his best time of the night,(8.61 @89.84) with my worst run of the night,(8.45 @91.71). my best was 7.97@90.7 I'm not saying one can't beat me but not for $2k!!!!

  • @XfireBlake 50 trim ? what where his supporting mods and how much boost was he pushing? They dont have headers they have a turbofold... Was it journal or BB? this all plays a major role.. If its a maxed out DBB 50 trim .63 on e85 with the right supporting mods he will do real low 11's in the 1/4 and maybe even 10s with the right driver for under 2k. Thats if he can drive the car, FWD and 500hp dont go hand in hand 2 well. What do you do in the 1/4.. Where are you from?

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT I'm a Xfire expert, not a neon expert, but I saw alot of pipes that didn't come with it; Both in the engine bay and intercooler plus the down pipes. He had a computer inside the car for adjustments so I guess he spent thousands. Don't get me wrong, that thing impressed me as I have raced many modded srt 4's and they all fall back quickly but this one was just 2 cars back! I run 1/4 in low 12's @ 116 on stock tires or high 11's with slicks but i'm too cheap;)

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT Oh yeah I like in Roanoke, VA. Hey you should look at Needswings since they modify both our cars:) I bought my intake and improved intake manifolds there. 450, and 700 respectively. My pulley was 450 and 400 for INMotion tune. I know a SRT 4 can hit 10's but not for $2k! This guys slicks and down pipes were 1500 at least;) Just call it SRT rivalry, and enjoy smacking down overweight srt 8's!

  • @XfireBlake LOL I guess if you buy everything brand new slicks and such you will be a little over 2k but if your on meth or e85 with a maxed out dbb 50 trim you should be running really low 11's on slicks with a SRT.. They weigh 2800-3100 w/o weight reduction that with 500hp/Tq Is a nasty combo.. But like I was saying its a kind of car that not many can drive. Yeah I have freinds that run needswings stuff its to over priced for me lol..

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT You seem very knowledgable about SRT 4's but not about costs or you are making it up.

    I found the 50 trim for $2500:) Then the intake, exhaust, and tune for Minimum of $1500! Then you need fuel upgrades, new intercooler, and blow off valve for well over a grand. Add some slicks for $400 plus wheels, and don't forget computers and gauges. I see at least 6 grand minimum! just on the engine to be in the 400's hp range! And the car still couldn't beat me;) List mod $

  • @XfireBlake LOL im not making anythings up. First off we locals share slicks/Dr's.. Second of all we have a community called SRTFORUMS/ NORCAL FORUMS with a huge selection of parts I got my DBB50trim on there for 700 and they have gone for as low as 400. If your spending 6k on a build you better be running a 6262 and be in the 10's LOL... Theres no reason to pay full price when people sell there cars and sale the parts for dirt cheap. Another this is a DSP can be bought for 250$

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT Well I am now schooled on used parts;) Crossfire parts come from one or 2 suppliers and with only 3000 SRT 6 ever made the price per unit on goodies is very high, but used market is none existent! I will say it's possible what you say, but I don't expect I will ever lose to a SRT 4 without at least $10k actually spent by someone;) I will try to find a video of one doing 12 flat and ask them how they did it!

  • @XfireBlake If 10k is spent he should be doing 10's/9's or he dosnt know how to spend his money lol.. The thing is SRT's tend to be owned by kids with big mouths that love to talk about there bone stock no driver mod srt. So your boosted? Have you considered running e85?

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT look up user ERabbit23, he is running 9's but has no original power train parts left. I'm guessing 20-30 grand unless parts and labor are donated;) As for E85, my car is not flex fuel, but when it's over 75-80 degrees I just add a bottle of octane boost or a gallon of race fuel before the track. I don't lose much timing anyway with 93 octane tune, unless its a heat wave. I know a crossfire guy that sprays washer fluid (meth) at WOT and that works great for him.

  • @XfireBlake Yeah ERabbit is from the Forum and he has a really expenisve build but he gets the hook up from DCR, owner of the red sled. I C im stuck with shitty 91 here in CA and meth help a lot. Most of my buddys are running meth because the closes E station is 30mins away...

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT I run about 17 psi max so I only have heak soak issues on hot days. I like to race in spring and fall;) With a supercharger the power is instant so it's great for roll racing! I will post some 1/4th mile runs on May 16th after mopar madness in Virginia Motorsports Park. I should hit 12-12.3

  • @XfireBlake With a wideband you can self tune all day. Intercoolers are very easy to come by locally for very cheap.. I have no reason to lie to you lol.. Some people just dont know how to find bargains.. You dont need a aftermarket BOV, the stock one leaks but not enough to make a significant difference. I maxed out my stock turbo for less then 1000, SAFC2 self tuned... and I had my full 50trim kit, kinetic mani, turbonetics ext wga ect, self ported everything for less then 1k...

  • @XfireBlake The SRT community is a pretty good one especially with locals. Theres also great deals and good people willing to help for free. Just gotta have freinds =), when we share slicks we usaully just drop a few bucks towards a new set when its time.

  • @XfireBlake Almost every maxed out stocker her in CA are running mid/low 12's with DR's and thats with the mini Td04... I personally know some running 6262's that are good for 9's all day but thats with a pretty expensive build. I did my entire 50 trim build/Cams/supporting mods for about 1900. Thats not including the price of my suspenion mods, and we usaully share DR's with eachother.. My buddy with minor bolt ons 23spike/e85 runs 12's on DRs thats about 1200$ invested.

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT I should say that I mean maxed stockers I know, not everyone in CA. Because some people cant drive worth a darn lol...

  • haha every VS battle car video comments are the same....this car is the best....no this car the best....

  • @cyz44 youre a dumb ass ignorant fuck with a questionable sexuality

  • @cyz44 just kidding.. that is always the out come of these internet arguments

  • @onquarter hahaha so true

  • BTW dont try to call me a Honda hater because b4 I had my 50 trim srt/00Ws6 I had a 96 gsr teg fully bolted on. I loved it its just to small for me.. Take the NSX to a road course and use its underpowered chasis for what its good for, CORNERS. Or TT Turbo it and make it a real car, but in the long wrong your wasting a lot of money starting with a NSX. You could have the performance and handling and performance in much cheaper chasis...

  • Lol are you kidding me? Please inform me on what is incorrect in my statement, and I give respect when deserved. The NSX is a 100k car with 275hp correct? That my freind is a failure of a supercar. A S2k Evo Wrx Vette SRT4 and anything else would bash the shit out of this with minor suspenion and performance mod and you would still have enough $ to buy a few other cars to play with. BTW lt1's are slow as shit a 98+ Trans am (which run 12s bone stock) would smash that honda.

  • Thats is a lt1 trans am, and lets not forget to mention you can buy that Trans am for around 4500$ for the difference in price between these 2 vehicles you could build a full out race car that will easily do 9's and still have enough money left over to eat out for a few months lol. NsX's look nice but NSX<S2k

  • @209BoOsTFrEaKsRT ehm..no not really...why not compare the engine between these 2..you gotta give respect for japanese muscle from time to time

  • I might be wrong but aren't those taillights from a 97+you should do the same with the hood

  • lol is this a lt1 t/a? if it is you should really put that in the vid description

  • @gawdspeedej20 Yeah, this is the slower version LT1... The faster LS1 is a full second faster in 1/4 mile numbers, versus an LT1.

  • gm piece of shit

  • stock nsx's suck but stock t/a's dont , and ta's are cool nsx's are gay

  • @mattcj90 $100k cars are gay, you are gay, can we drive you?

  • V8 is obviously faster than a V6 or I4. ricers just claim that opposite cuz most of their hondas/toyota weigh less and have fat turbos on them. if you raced the exact same cars(weight, driveline, mods etc) one with a V6 or I4 versus V8. the V8 would definately win, no question at all. the V8 can create more HP and torque naturally aspirated. 4cylinders<8cylinders. American Muscle!

  • @The1Delta1 I would like to be the first to welcome you into the car world. Few key pointers: You can't claim what car is fast based on cylinders. You've got lots to learn my friend.

  • @The1Delta1 NOPE, I love V8's regardless of country of origin, but average power over rpm range/ weight is the real factor of badass! My SRT6 Crossfire has a 3.2 liter and makes 420HP with $2K in easy mods! It's light weight means it leaves new ss slowmaros and new 5.0 rustangs in the dust for half the money so don't think a V6 can't wax that ass! Before you blast me for boost, it is stock supercharged and because the SC has magnetic activation I get 27 MPG while killing V8's;)

  • @The1Delta1

    Calm down buddy, just because it's a V8 doesn't equal american muscle. Ever heard of a M3?

  • @HellionX ever heard of the NSX type s zero

  • VTEC - Virtually Torqueless Economy Car

  • @ClutchGT your an idiot... clearly a v8 failure.

  • @codeyp52 dude the Pontiac GPGT I bought my little sister for her birthday literally has more torque than an NSX, no joke. Honda doesnt seem to know how to build a motor with any torque. And BTW shut your mouth I'm no V8 failure, 3.0L 2JZ-GTE Turbo'd Straight Six! Suck it! Supra > NSX!

  • @ClutchGT lol ouuuu, im scared. i think i peed a little... v8 dont mean anything to me.

  • @ClutchGT Torque x rpm/5252 = HP........ A formula 1 car has just over 200 lb/ft of torque! can you beat it with your bowtie? haha lol stay in school;)

  • @XfireBlake Hense my supra smart ass. My supra would embarass that POS Honda anyday along with anything you got. =P

  • @ClutchGT By that bold statement I assume your supra is running huge boost and tune, and must make well over 500 hp. I'm sure someone, somewhere can beat it with a civic, but what's the point is it's not a daily driver? I know moddified supra's are fast as hell but I've never seen one with enough mods to come close to my SRT 6, here in Virginia anyway. I will post a few more videos tonight of me running 7.9's @92 in the 1/8th while spinning my useless street tires:)

  • @ClutchGT When are you gonna post videos of "your" supra?

  • @XfireBlake

    I finished installing the GREDDY turbo late last fall, unfortunately less than a week later it started to snow, a supra is by far no means winter car. As soon as the snow clears up I'll plan on posting some shit =) If you think im about to powder coat my paint job with road salt you've got to be smokin some mad shit. XD

  • @ClutchGT Awesome! I look forward to your video's, and I appreciate your dedication to the longevity of your car as I share that goal. I drive mine all winter but compensate with 5-6 waxes and 1 clay bar per year;) My wheels are pitting though:( TSW are shit! I just got my new intake mani's that should provide 30-44 HP top end depending on tune, which is being updated this week. Let me know your results/ stats;)

  • v6 vs v8 come on v8 gotta keep up with small v6 like that haha

  • @ovgproduction not fair to say it like that, what was the MSRP on that NSX and the WS6 when new? IIRC NSX is about 2x the price? for 70-80k USD, it better damn well win

  • I think the Nsx is a well built car with great power to weight but the cost of one is way not worth it. You could get a z06 for viper GTS for what you pay for the NSX turbo. This is just my two cents and do not own any othe the three but rather going on mags and online reviews.

  • Hey there, C5 owner, I don't know who told you that an NSX shares the "chassis" of a Ferrari, but you've been terribly misinformed. Honda and Ferrari share absolutely nothing with any of their vehicles, chassis or otherwise. I'm a huge fan of Honda, but the NSX is very overpriced for what it is. And it doesn't cost more because it's "better built," it cost more because of exclusivity. Not to say the NSX isn't a great car with the highest standards in build quality, but it's way overpriced.

  • @PhoenixEJ1 yeah the nsx was built purely by honda on their first fully aluminum chassis. its more expensive because they put alot more tech into it. my SS camaro can smoke one of those with my 227 crane cam and mild bolt ons. nsx is a handling car. nothing more.

  • @hellcat320Okay, I understand the R&D thing and all, but just as much goes into a new Pilot, but they're not $90k. If you're going to charge that much for a Honda, it should at least have an engine a little more stout than a slightly beefed up J series that goes in every V6 Honda including the Odyssey. A $90k super sports car should have something a tad more exclusive and a lot more powerful, in my personal opinion. Honda needs to stop being a bunch of pussies and make a god damn V8 already.

  • @hellcat320 but! if u talk about smoking one...try to smoke a Type S Zero NEX :)

  • @PhoenixEJ1 Its not overpriced. It shares no major parts with any other Acura or Honda and is all aluminum .... and rear mid-engine. That is very expensive (esp back in the 90s). I know GM wanted to do a rear mid-engine corvette and it was axed because it would have added about 30-40K to the cost (of a regular corvette).

  • @cptnsx So, the C30 and C32 series V6's in the NSX are shared with NO other Honda? That's like saying the B16B is shared in no other Honda just because it's a slightly different B series. Sure, there are differences in the C32A and B, but it's still just a Honda V6. I'm pretty sure the C32 was used in a few different Acuras, but you're right about the C30 being exclusive to the NSX. Still overpriced in my opinion. I just realized I referred to the J series engine incorrectly in my last post oops

  • it cost more because its better built.... dod you know it has the same chassie as a ferrari, american cars are cheap because look at the material and worksmen craft on the car, colbalt,camaro,zr1... not hateing but just laying down the fact, from a c5 owner

  • we're talking about a v6 (nsx) eating up a v8 (ws6). what a shame! american muscle what? haha jdm bby!

  • @unwantedguysss yeah you can keep your overpriced over rated JDM crap. I'd like to see you haul 4 people in it. or put a car seat in it. for what that nsx cost you could buy that ta 5 times over. or only spend about another grand and make that nsx it's bitch

  • @black82s10 LoL ur just another pathetic ignorant geek behind the computer screen lol. 

  • @unwantedguysss right, I'll tell you what. line up your car against mine. hope your mom's minivan can outrun my 99 ws6. jackass. just fyi, I'm married with a kid, a house and a full time job. so if you want to call that being a pathetic ignorant geek, whatever

  • @black82s10 yayyyy good for you! LoL

  • @unwantedguysss the nsx weighs less... dumb fuck