Yes, this version sounds suitably dreamy. But critically speaking, Percy Grainger took liberties with the actual score. Grainger arpeggiated the chords on the left hand (and sometimes together with the right hand), which was not what the composer indicated. Grainger also took liberties with the tempo, which is permissible to some extent.
Wonderful to hear this fascinating work by a truly fascinating composer. Grainger was a pianist of such remarkable brilliance so it is fantastic that we still have extant recordings of him playing. Delightful!
As a past board member of the Percy Grainger International Society I am happy to find this on Youtube, however, with that said, it is not representative of Grainger's ability. It is rather 'stiff'. There are recordings of Percy doing this 'live' that are considerably more musical. But I do understand the historical importance and thank you for post it on Youtube.
Very nice, especially that this is an historical performance. This is the first opportunity I have had to listen to a work by Cyril Scott whose writings I deeply appreciate.
This is terrible! It is totally non-musical, several chords and octaves are rolled when they are not supposed to be, and this piano is incredibly bright that this piece sounds like a cheap bar-piano improvisation. Why would anyone allow this to published, and, more importantly, why would anyone listen to it?!
I'm glad you enjoyed it. I also heard that Grainger was very involved in the expression editing. One quote from him is that the DA represented him not as he actually played, but as he "would like to play."
Yes, the drawer is unusual for the DA, but quite nice for requiring no design changes to the action and instrument scale. Chickering apparently licensed the DA system late and kept the drawer almost identical to the Ampico, but the rest of the player is typical Duo-Art. This is also the only one I've ever seen.
Hang on, this piano looks and sounds really familiar...
Oh well, thanks for posting this, dad.
banananer16 6 months ago
Grainger's approach to this piece is not exactly what I would wish. But this video is absolutely fascinating regardless!
PrettyGoodies1 1 year ago
Yes, this version sounds suitably dreamy. But critically speaking, Percy Grainger took liberties with the actual score. Grainger arpeggiated the chords on the left hand (and sometimes together with the right hand), which was not what the composer indicated. Grainger also took liberties with the tempo, which is permissible to some extent.
VIDE0DR0ME 1 year ago
Wonderful to hear this fascinating work by a truly fascinating composer. Grainger was a pianist of such remarkable brilliance so it is fantastic that we still have extant recordings of him playing. Delightful!
owatson322utube 1 year ago
It's almost as he is playing here and now.
jabajabamaster 1 year ago
Highly interesting. Valuable. Better than most performances out there. What more is there to say?
drmrh01 2 years ago
As a past board member of the Percy Grainger International Society I am happy to find this on Youtube, however, with that said, it is not representative of Grainger's ability. It is rather 'stiff'. There are recordings of Percy doing this 'live' that are considerably more musical. But I do understand the historical importance and thank you for post it on Youtube.
leroyosmon 2 years ago
Very nice, especially that this is an historical performance. This is the first opportunity I have had to listen to a work by Cyril Scott whose writings I deeply appreciate.
FrankMento 2 years ago
Very nice and the Chickering is a very nice sounding piano. Lovely!
Thanks for sharing.
aknabea 2 years ago
This is terrible! It is totally non-musical, several chords and octaves are rolled when they are not supposed to be, and this piano is incredibly bright that this piece sounds like a cheap bar-piano improvisation. Why would anyone allow this to published, and, more importantly, why would anyone listen to it?!
coasterman16 3 years ago
due to its incredibly rich historicity and because grainger's exact tempos and rubato remain the same. because it exists due to his creating it!!
psalms8510 2 years ago
@coasterman16 I agree, totally
Blackgeoff1 1 year ago
This is a great recording! I read somewhere that Grainger was very involved in perfecting his Duo-Art recordings.
bigcity233 3 years ago 3
I'm glad you enjoyed it. I also heard that Grainger was very involved in the expression editing. One quote from him is that the DA represented him not as he actually played, but as he "would like to play."
bartolomochristofari 3 years ago
I have heard of Draw mounted DA's but this is the 1st one ive seen....thanks for sharing a great roll and player.
DuoArtDanOz 3 years ago 2
Yes, the drawer is unusual for the DA, but quite nice for requiring no design changes to the action and instrument scale. Chickering apparently licensed the DA system late and kept the drawer almost identical to the Ampico, but the rest of the player is typical Duo-Art. This is also the only one I've ever seen.
bartolomochristofari 3 years ago
excellent!
pianolasociety 3 years ago 2