Excellent, excellent video. I was aware of the inverse square law however seeing your demonstrations really help clarify it. Thanks so much for doing this series and thanks to Adorama for sponsoring it.
Concerning the panels shown at 6:00, why is the left side of the 1st panel darker than the right side of the last panel? The panel appears to be ~4 ft. wide, so given the image taken at 1 ft., the images taken at 8 and 16 ft. should be no brighter than the left side of the 1' image, which should be ~ 5 ft. from the light source.
This "experiment" is completely USELESS if you don't turn off the ambient lights. It doesn't look like you turned off the ambient lights. By 16ft, you are taking a photo with the lights on the ceiling instead of the softbox. This entire thing sounded like a corny infomercial TBH, you should learn how to conduct experiments properly.
hi Mark this is the best thing i came to know really great , earlier i was bit confused with this Inverse square law but u made us understand with real life examples WOW AND THANKS HATS OFF
Mark, I have never heard about the Inverse Square Law, this is the first video I found which dealing with it. But this video is not only just a nice side effect, to me, it seems essential to know about it since it makes all the ratio difference. Great tutorial, so perfectly explained.
Your going to have severe shadows on the background if you place the subject(s) to near the background, and the light far away from both. The lightsource has become smaller, therefore you get a hard light, when you need a soft light. The best tip is to have a main light (for the subject), rim light for the hair and partly separation, and a background light for the separation it self.
@epos85 It depends on the size of the light source. If for example you use a huge Octobox as in this video & the subjects 20 feet away & close to the background the light will be soft & cause no shadows. See Marks other video Ep 64 where he demonstrates it.
Great work,Mark. I've come across your videos by chance on the Internet and I find them very... enlightening! I'm deep into maths but this is really clarifying the way you do! thanks!
I have a Nikon D3100. I can now shoot in manual mode after years of auto focus. This due mainly to your programs which is helpful and edifying. But i have a little problem that is on my Nikon D3100 that won't allow me to connect my Remote shutter release to the camera. can you shed some light?
Mark, this has got the be the best tutorial of all the series. Thanks so much for breaking it down with examples because it really made it easy to understand the concept. Thank you very much!!!
You really know your stuff! Good job! Theres a douche on youtube named Dom Bower and he really is a douche who can't take criticism and cant sufficiently back up his statements. He actually critiques other photographers work, which I think is the worst thing in the world because someone who doesnt know photography shouldnt be allowed to judge others. He is sham. Snapfactory on the other hand is the best! :D
Imagine a sphere of radius 1 foot around the light source, and compare that to a bigger sphere of radius 2 feet. The surface area of the bigger sphere is not twice, but four times the smaller sphere (because the area is proportional to the square of the radius). So each unit area in the bigger sphere is absorbing only 1/4 of light as that in the smaller sphere. Hence the inverse square law.
Great video... I'd never heard of this. Now I know. :) Also, Sam got a haircut! It looks great! I'm surprised no one else has said anything about it yet, haha.
@pjos111 Well he is talking about using a flash in general...the inverse square law is more practically used with a flash, he was just using a constant light source to better get his point across...
Hey Mark, what octabox are you using in this video?
lalalaina4life 2 weeks ago
Excellent, excellent video. I was aware of the inverse square law however seeing your demonstrations really help clarify it. Thanks so much for doing this series and thanks to Adorama for sponsoring it.
TheYFlyer 2 weeks ago
Concerning the panels shown at 6:00, why is the left side of the 1st panel darker than the right side of the last panel? The panel appears to be ~4 ft. wide, so given the image taken at 1 ft., the images taken at 8 and 16 ft. should be no brighter than the left side of the 1' image, which should be ~ 5 ft. from the light source.
gfr327 2 weeks ago
This "experiment" is completely USELESS if you don't turn off the ambient lights. It doesn't look like you turned off the ambient lights. By 16ft, you are taking a photo with the lights on the ceiling instead of the softbox. This entire thing sounded like a corny infomercial TBH, you should learn how to conduct experiments properly.
gromacs00 3 weeks ago
Right. area follows rules of square. If we were measuring volume we would be looking at cubed math and really make things complicated. I like it!
bloddynose13 3 weeks ago
as clear as mudd lol...you got that right.
stecartmel 1 month ago
Excellent and useful tip to make the best of a simple light setup
catgasoline 1 month ago
man she is so pretty
superrobotmunkyman 1 month ago
Great job, Mark! Clear, concise and wonderful examples.
nstarbill 1 month ago
this is the simplest and important class i have witnessed.
Mr550d 1 month ago
hi Mark this is the best thing i came to know really great , earlier i was bit confused with this Inverse square law but u made us understand with real life examples WOW AND THANKS HATS OFF
Ketandh 1 month ago
Mark, I have never heard about the Inverse Square Law, this is the first video I found which dealing with it. But this video is not only just a nice side effect, to me, it seems essential to know about it since it makes all the ratio difference. Great tutorial, so perfectly explained.
SirOpusculum 1 month ago
Your going to have severe shadows on the background if you place the subject(s) to near the background, and the light far away from both. The lightsource has become smaller, therefore you get a hard light, when you need a soft light. The best tip is to have a main light (for the subject), rim light for the hair and partly separation, and a background light for the separation it self.
epos85 2 months ago in playlist Digital Photography: One on One
@epos85 It depends on the size of the light source. If for example you use a huge Octobox as in this video & the subjects 20 feet away & close to the background the light will be soft & cause no shadows. See Marks other video Ep 64 where he demonstrates it.
global001 1 month ago
i agree. she is hotter with longer hair.
petrentz 2 months ago
Sorry Sam but like you with longer hair...but you are still gorgeous. Good job Mark!
jcwienerjr 2 months ago
Great work,Mark. I've come across your videos by chance on the Internet and I find them very... enlightening! I'm deep into maths but this is really clarifying the way you do! thanks!
zaphod1981 2 months ago
Thanks, Mark. I've been reading up on it, but seeing it in action just cleared up the entire theory!
mcrawford29 2 months ago
Hi Mark..great tips! i learned a lot from your videos
nokiasaya81 3 months ago
thank you God 4 Mark !!!
vertusmatjaz 4 months ago
i am already subscribed
best tv in world...
mark is the best!
vertusmatjaz 4 months ago
thank you ... was very very clear..
swapnilhitman 5 months ago
Thank you very much, very clear!!
GianpaoloLaPaglia 5 months ago
Sam get a new haircut. Like it.
joytobylee 6 months ago
Mark could you tell me if the source of the light Sun, how does this going to be effect ?
1thusitha 6 months ago
More videos please!!!!!
sebabhz 6 months ago
sam look nicer in this hair cut than longer hair ,she is so cute
WideSeal 7 months ago
I have a Nikon D3100. I can now shoot in manual mode after years of auto focus. This due mainly to your programs which is helpful and edifying. But i have a little problem that is on my Nikon D3100 that won't allow me to connect my Remote shutter release to the camera. can you shed some light?
neilalli 7 months ago
super usefull! thank you!
pepenacho65 7 months ago
Mark, this has got the be the best tutorial of all the series. Thanks so much for breaking it down with examples because it really made it easy to understand the concept. Thank you very much!!!
jitu757 7 months ago
You're the best Mark! This video is really helpful. You make inverse square law very easy to understand.
extacci 8 months ago
very very very useful vid ....thanks so much
thespark24 8 months ago
great job man
booshveg 8 months ago
mark i really enjoy your tutorial every time, I need your DVD that came out about lighting.How can I get it and keep up the good work.
kazeem2000 9 months ago
I like Sam's short hair style!
ejphoto 9 months ago
Awesome! Thanks, Mark! :D
paulosacramento 9 months ago
hey mark im a filmmaker does the inverse square law works the same way with continuous light when lighting a scene?
3guys1girlandfetus 9 months ago
Comment removed
3guys1girlandfetus 9 months ago
Man, I always learn so much from the videos on this channel! Thanks for these videos. Really appreciate the clear explanations :)
popaddict 9 months ago
I like Sam she is so cute :), nice model
damirsmigi 9 months ago
Mark.. this is unreal.. Ive learnt more in 3 episodes than in 4 weeks of photography Class!
Brilliant
WarrenAckary180 10 months ago 10
You really know your stuff! Good job! Theres a douche on youtube named Dom Bower and he really is a douche who can't take criticism and cant sufficiently back up his statements. He actually critiques other photographers work, which I think is the worst thing in the world because someone who doesnt know photography shouldnt be allowed to judge others. He is sham. Snapfactory on the other hand is the best! :D
KeijinShiho 10 months ago
Thank you... this is really good. and helpful... as well as applicable.
usantacruz 10 months ago
Mark where can i get your new DVD on lighting i saw the clip on you tube i need to get it, I really enjoy your show on you tube good job.
kazeem2000 10 months ago 3
@kazeem2000 studiolightingessentials (.) com
snapfactory 10 months ago
isn't there a second light in the example at the ceiling?
i see there a shadow from the wrong direction
comberdale 10 months ago
isn't there a second light in the example at the ceiling?
i see there a shadow from the wrong direction
comberdale 10 months ago
Fantastic video.
Solarfactor 10 months ago
Well done!!!! :)
marloon88 10 months ago
love ur work!!
thanks =D
salsero206 10 months ago
Ideal episode! Thanks, Mark!!!
uldistube 10 months ago
Imagine a sphere of radius 1 foot around the light source, and compare that to a bigger sphere of radius 2 feet. The surface area of the bigger sphere is not twice, but four times the smaller sphere (because the area is proportional to the square of the radius). So each unit area in the bigger sphere is absorbing only 1/4 of light as that in the smaller sphere. Hence the inverse square law.
oscarcll 10 months ago 6
Mark you're genius. thank you for all the videos!!!
Sam is so pretty <3
leoali83 10 months ago
Sam you are great !!
EVAn182 10 months ago
Great info thanks!
JACOBthePHOTOGRAPHER 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very well explained. Thanks.
DGK1150 10 months ago
Very well explained. Thanks.
DGK1150 10 months ago
Anyone else think Mark sounds abit like Owen Wilson?
teamblankCM 10 months ago
Hey Mark!!,,Tell me how to subscribe??
ashwin0pp 10 months ago
Hey Mark!!..Tell me How to Subscribe??
ashwin0pp 10 months ago
Best photo related videos on youtube!
TheOats 10 months ago
I think Sam looks better with longer hair!
imaginemylove22 10 months ago
good job, really well done.
PLANEINPARIS 10 months ago
Epiphany time!!!!
in2food 10 months ago
I hope you cenverted to Nikon, Mark! ;)
pedrojesusfreakaoid 10 months ago
@pedrojesusfreakaoid nope. He shoots both, heck, if I could do the same, I would! :P
GreasyPsycho 10 months ago
Great stuff! Thank you!
Morningsidenursery 10 months ago
Muito bom. Obrigada
saradantasmelo 10 months ago
What a gorgeous model. Breathtakingly beautiful.
garitd 10 months ago
ur the man, mark, very informative, can`t wait for the vid.
thanks.
vanhellcng 10 months ago
Probably the best video you have made to date. Excellent explanation. Very useful information
Stryk3r1000 10 months ago
great clip and explanation, sam mary me :)
tomekmisiewicz 10 months ago
Thank you Mark! I don't even have a flash yet, but I do have a reflector (got it after seeing your vid on that) and I can't wait to try this out!
padlockd 10 months ago
Great demo.
Thanks
tabber05 10 months ago
Great video... I'd never heard of this. Now I know. :) Also, Sam got a haircut! It looks great! I'm surprised no one else has said anything about it yet, haha.
Claggy 10 months ago
awesome video, once again!
Dimacheari 10 months ago
Best explanation I've seen so far.
hugdeez 10 months ago
Samantha is very pretty!
edvasquez354 10 months ago
Great explanation and demonstration. And I'm in love with Sam
diamened 10 months ago
Amazing thank you
johnxmzzhang 10 months ago
please continue the great work.
most photographers would charge money for videos like this.
Sinwori 10 months ago
Very helpful.
akai1sora 10 months ago
VERY INTERESTING THAN YOU MARK
babyharryable 10 months ago
Only you could explain this in such clear way! Great job M.W. :)
Wandy1D 10 months ago
Mark you rock!
MrMikeCanon 10 months ago
and you can see that there is a difference 11:19 ---just messin around!!!! great job mark!
weboo15 10 months ago
WOW! Mark you are the best!!! tou explain this so well... keep up the great work man!!!
fcoizq 10 months ago 34
most of the models are called Sam :)
Speshalyst 10 months ago 25
@Speshalyst i think thats the other Sam...she just cut her hair short~
jlive555 4 months ago
@Speshalyst Mark collects Sams.
hibbledor 4 months ago
Very interesting Mark, it's good to know how it actually works
supervf1 10 months ago
been waiting for a week for you to upload this episode, you should do one on one twice a week =]
ny1fanta 10 months ago
awesome!!!
yowu7446 10 months ago
As brilliant as always! thx
Michi23 10 months ago
Learning has occurred. Great video!
fetor41 10 months ago
Great video.. I had never heard about this before.. Thanks!
MrMatz45 10 months ago
nothing to say ... only GREAT
rosn73 10 months ago
That's the simplest i've seen it put.. thanks Markorama!
kamalmerai 10 months ago
wow you are really good at explaining mark
well done :D
keep up the good work
DVL1507 10 months ago
Great stuff! I really learn a lot! Thanks Mark!!!
youmantube2009 10 months ago
good concept!
thoimonoko 10 months ago
When you took the first photo a flash fired, does this not make a difference?
Paul
pjos111 10 months ago
@pjos111 Well he is talking about using a flash in general...the inverse square law is more practically used with a flash, he was just using a constant light source to better get his point across...
Mozo901 10 months ago
@Mozo901 Thanks for answering. :)
pjos111 10 months ago
Awesome as usual. Thanks Mark!!
Madhack2004 10 months ago
This is the most simple and clearest explanation of Inverse Square Law. Thanks Mark.
saperboy 10 months ago
This one was very interesting. Thanks for the great explanation, Mark!
jan4iks 10 months ago
First, and great show :)
Mosgaard 10 months ago