Videos on a site about information are bad. It slows down loading time and distracts you from the actual information it's giving you. Links are enough, because then you can CHOOSE whether to bog down your browser or not, and images tell you all you need anyway. What can a video that's implanted in the site tell you that an image can't?
Comment removed
liberator328 2 years ago
@liberator328
wen u wrote that i dint notic u skipped 3, it was way 2 early and the rest is just repeating itself and ur a fag...
AndreasZimmerman 2 years ago
@AndreasZimmerman oh shit i never put that there uh i think i got haked
liberator328 2 years ago
@liberator328 youre supposed to write 12 facts as a headline tard..
Ipsenergud 2 years ago
Videos on a site about information are bad. It slows down loading time and distracts you from the actual information it's giving you. Links are enough, because then you can CHOOSE whether to bog down your browser or not, and images tell you all you need anyway. What can a video that's implanted in the site tell you that an image can't?
lkfsla
Frustrates me.
AnimeGameOST 2 years ago
this is total fail, wikipedia its a girl
wikipe-tan
its made by the wikipedia
MakubekuUrashima 3 years ago
zzzzzz
plantus105 3 years ago
wikipedia is better because it gives u links to videos and images, rather than bogging down loading time.
spartan317 3 years ago
Lol!!!!
stearosisters 4 years ago
lol
restrictedinfo 4 years ago
haha
he's so gangsta
PinkTigeress2 4 years ago