Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thanks, I thought I'd seen all Tom Campbell videos, there seems to be more popping up recently, which is great. Now if only we could get those poor people being brainwashed by project Camelot/Avalon, to start watching more accurate honest and useful information.

  • Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...

  • I'm confused still, if his big toe were true, and if my whole experience is always the most probable, how could there be any change at all? I mean, how does what's most probable become less probable; wouldn't what's most probable right now, perpetuate itself? I've got this feeling that, what he believes to be consistent probability, is rather constant uncertainty. Does that make any sense..? Maybe you could help clear some of my confusion on his theory or point of view. :)

  • @tonyfalca Good question! What is most probable is dependent on a set of things, which are constantly dynamic, changing and evolving. We have to consider that the system itself is set up to evolve, the very nature of change. So while it is most probable that you will see a tree with green leaves in the spring, it is most probable that you will see one with no leaves in the winter. That is a basic example. In your own life, it depends on your personal evolution, etc.. (does that help?)

  • @EvitaOchel Let's see if I can reword my confusion. Like you've mentioned, it's most probable that we would see a tree with green leaves in the spring, and with no leaves in the winter, since this happens every year, over and over. Considering that, of course we would assume it's the most probable, but what about the very first tree on Earth -- wouldn't we then assume the very first tree on Earth acted in the same way, and if so, why would have that been most probable back then?

  • @tonyfalca I hope that made sense. I know I'd written a lot just now, yet it felt like I said very, very little if nothing at all... lol. Talking in circles.

  • @EvitaOchel [Sorry for the spam of comments.] Your tree example though, that was exactly the point I was trying to make in my first comment. The annual cycle of trees is most probable because, let's assume, it happens over and over and it's therefore self-enforcing; the most probable perpetuates itself beyond change, for the most part, like how the cycle of trees is seemingly fixed.

  • Interesting vid!

    This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!

    This theory is based on two postulates

    1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself photon by photon.

    2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.

  • Just as an addition, the fact that your books are available on pirate channels, is actually a complement ;-)

  • Excellent video, I nearly missed this one, perish the thought.

  • Awesomely awesome. I think I have watched pretty much all of Tom´s lectures on YouTube. I have learned something from every one of them. That being said, I SO appreciated the piece about expressing who we are by what we do and seeing ourselves as part of a bigger plan in relation to upcoming paradigm shifts. Thank you Tom for doing what you do, your have been vital to my "growing up"! Thank you Evita for an eloquent interview.

  • @HSIves1 You are so welcome, and thank you for the awesome feedback :)

  • I started off as a BS Chem E. I did research for the Department of Energy at Lawrence Berkeley Labs. I loved the scientific method. When I went to medical school, I was shocked at how variable the results were compared to the physical sciences. I love how he connects the paranormal to scientific with the placebo effect and double blind randomized studies. So glad to be turned on to this subject, and can't wait to see episodes two and three. Kudos to you both : )

  • wow the live podcasts are the greatests... im always fascinated by Monroe Ins, there are so many experiences in that field from so many people; we've been turned into automatons and isolated from this kind of teachings.

  • Every year new, short-lived elementary particles are discovered. Frequently their

    existence is predicted before their discovery. It has been seriously suggested that these

    particles are being produced, rather than discovered, by the sustained mental efforts of

    physicist around the world. Although we have been conditioned to accept naive

    realism by our scientifically based education, such an idea cannot be dismissed out of

    hand.

    Professor A.J. Ellison

  • @whitenightf3 Nice quote from Arthur Ellison, thank you! He was the epitome of an open-minded scientist,like Tom Campbell, a professor of electrical engineering, and served on the council of the British Society for Psychical Research and also the early advisory board of The Monroe Institute. If he were still with us, he would be right in there with Tom and MBT!

  • Thanks for the opportunity to watch this. Nice job :)

  • @snodart You are most welcome and thanks for the feedback!

  • Great interview, great upload, thank you! This was a pleasure to watch, now I'm moving onto Part 2 =D

  • @HueyTheDoctor87 Awesome to hear, and thank you!

  • Hey Evita: So glad you posted this interview with Thomas. I have followed his work for some time also and LOVE what he has to say. I have asked him questions and he is always very gracious with him time and answers. He is a "for real" modern mystic and scientist who has satisfying answers on just about any subject one could pose. He has given me a real faith about the afterlife. And...you are lovely as usual!!!

  • @rovingdesertfox You are so welcome! I think Tom's work is so valuable and spans across every area of life in the physical and spiritual in such an elegant and clear way. And I agree with all that you shared - very awesome observation - thank you for your supportive comment :)

  • Great discussion! Looking forward to parts 2 and 3. Thank you so much.

  • @vasoula2908 Thank you for your feedback - part 2 and 3 are now available.

  • Evita, what a cool interview; you are very good at what you do! As the interview progressed, it was also funny to watch Tom virtually 'unrender' before our eyes in the video!

  • @whitehawk22 Thank you for your feedback and comment. So encouraging to read :) And yes, I am glad you pointed that out in terms of "Tom's un-rendering" I thought that was so neat too in its timing!

  • The Spirit is our REAL (heavenly) FATHER...and until we(His children) didn't find Him, we do not deserve to control anything(inherit The Kingdom)...otherwise we wouldn't (be able to)appreciate the enormous amount of wisdom/love invested in ALL THAT IS... FOR well, you see, THE FATHER (the creator) IS OUR REAL IDENTITY...beyond the veil of the matrix(the virtual illusion)...and,YES!...:)...WE ARE THE ONE WE'RE (so desperately) LOOKING FOR...:)... May you Be Blessed and FREE...:)... ♥Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ♥

  • @zalmos12 Thank you for sharing your views.

  • we cannot EVER create ANYTHING unless we're in accordance with The Spirit that animates and binds all things in existence, and THAT(the spirit) WILL CREATE IT FOR YOU(but ONLY if /when necessary)... All we can(EVER) do is to understand this simple LAW... :) ... Find The Spirit within, stop the false identifying of your-self with the ego(the shell), merge with the Spirit and then you'll see what I mean...;)...

  • Well, there are two major ways of understanding that:1- The long run(the large path) is the path of spiraling through the matrix in the cycles of events suffering the metamorphosis and the low awakening- that takes countless billions of (that which we call)years of quiet or noisy so called evolution, and 2:The short(narrow) path of the blade- the path of giving up the illusion and AWAKE from the amnesia- it's the path of the ascended masters(the saints)...Anyone has the choice.What's yours?...;)

  • Comment removed

  • ‎"Most of us are irrational. Most of us live by our beliefs rather by any kind of logic, and what passes for logic is certainty of belief."

    -Tom Campbell

  • Hi Evita,

    I hope you had a very nice Christmas and New Year.

    It always pleases me to listen to open minded scientists, wish there were more like them.

  • @pduffy4 Thank you, I did indeed :) And yes, I so agree. Science should be pushing the boundaries of what is possible, not getting stuck in the boundaries as we see happening so often these days. But all in good timing as personal evolution takes its course ;)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more