Thanks, I thought I'd seen all Tom Campbell videos, there seems to be more popping up recently, which is great. Now if only we could get those poor people being brainwashed by project Camelot/Avalon, to start watching more accurate honest and useful information.
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams.
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
I'm confused still, if his big toe were true, and if my whole experience is always the most probable, how could there be any change at all? I mean, how does what's most probable become less probable; wouldn't what's most probable right now, perpetuate itself? I've got this feeling that, what he believes to be consistent probability, is rather constant uncertainty. Does that make any sense..? Maybe you could help clear some of my confusion on his theory or point of view. :)
@tonyfalca Good question! What is most probable is dependent on a set of things, which are constantly dynamic, changing and evolving. We have to consider that the system itself is set up to evolve, the very nature of change. So while it is most probable that you will see a tree with green leaves in the spring, it is most probable that you will see one with no leaves in the winter. That is a basic example. In your own life, it depends on your personal evolution, etc.. (does that help?)
@EvitaOchel Let's see if I can reword my confusion. Like you've mentioned, it's most probable that we would see a tree with green leaves in the spring, and with no leaves in the winter, since this happens every year, over and over. Considering that, of course we would assume it's the most probable, but what about the very first tree on Earth -- wouldn't we then assume the very first tree on Earth acted in the same way, and if so, why would have that been most probable back then?
@tonyfalca I hope that made sense. I know I'd written a lot just now, yet it felt like I said very, very little if nothing at all... lol. Talking in circles.
@EvitaOchel [Sorry for the spam of comments.] Your tree example though, that was exactly the point I was trying to make in my first comment. The annual cycle of trees is most probable because, let's assume, it happens over and over and it's therefore self-enforcing; the most probable perpetuates itself beyond change, for the most part, like how the cycle of trees is seemingly fixed.
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
Awesomely awesome. I think I have watched pretty much all of Tom´s lectures on YouTube. I have learned something from every one of them. That being said, I SO appreciated the piece about expressing who we are by what we do and seeing ourselves as part of a bigger plan in relation to upcoming paradigm shifts. Thank you Tom for doing what you do, your have been vital to my "growing up"! Thank you Evita for an eloquent interview.
I started off as a BS Chem E. I did research for the Department of Energy at Lawrence Berkeley Labs. I loved the scientific method. When I went to medical school, I was shocked at how variable the results were compared to the physical sciences. I love how he connects the paranormal to scientific with the placebo effect and double blind randomized studies. So glad to be turned on to this subject, and can't wait to see episodes two and three. Kudos to you both : )
wow the live podcasts are the greatests... im always fascinated by Monroe Ins, there are so many experiences in that field from so many people; we've been turned into automatons and isolated from this kind of teachings.
@whitenightf3 Nice quote from Arthur Ellison, thank you! He was the epitome of an open-minded scientist,like Tom Campbell, a professor of electrical engineering, and served on the council of the British Society for Psychical Research and also the early advisory board of The Monroe Institute. If he were still with us, he would be right in there with Tom and MBT!
Hey Evita: So glad you posted this interview with Thomas. I have followed his work for some time also and LOVE what he has to say. I have asked him questions and he is always very gracious with him time and answers. He is a "for real" modern mystic and scientist who has satisfying answers on just about any subject one could pose. He has given me a real faith about the afterlife. And...you are lovely as usual!!!
@rovingdesertfox You are so welcome! I think Tom's work is so valuable and spans across every area of life in the physical and spiritual in such an elegant and clear way. And I agree with all that you shared - very awesome observation - thank you for your supportive comment :)
Evita, what a cool interview; you are very good at what you do! As the interview progressed, it was also funny to watch Tom virtually 'unrender' before our eyes in the video!
@whitehawk22 Thank you for your feedback and comment. So encouraging to read :) And yes, I am glad you pointed that out in terms of "Tom's un-rendering" I thought that was so neat too in its timing!
The Spirit is our REAL (heavenly) FATHER...and until we(His children) didn't find Him, we do not deserve to control anything(inherit The Kingdom)...otherwise we wouldn't (be able to)appreciate the enormous amount of wisdom/love invested in ALL THAT IS... FOR well, you see, THE FATHER (the creator) IS OUR REAL IDENTITY...beyond the veil of the matrix(the virtual illusion)...and,YES!...:)...WE ARE THE ONE WE'RE (so desperately) LOOKING FOR...:)... May you Be Blessed and FREE...:)... ♥Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ♥
we cannot EVER create ANYTHING unless we're in accordance with The Spirit that animates and binds all things in existence, and THAT(the spirit) WILL CREATE IT FOR YOU(but ONLY if /when necessary)... All we can(EVER) do is to understand this simple LAW... :) ... Find The Spirit within, stop the false identifying of your-self with the ego(the shell), merge with the Spirit and then you'll see what I mean...;)...
Well, there are two major ways of understanding that:1- The long run(the large path) is the path of spiraling through the matrix in the cycles of events suffering the metamorphosis and the low awakening- that takes countless billions of (that which we call)years of quiet or noisy so called evolution, and 2:The short(narrow) path of the blade- the path of giving up the illusion and AWAKE from the amnesia- it's the path of the ascended masters(the saints)...Anyone has the choice.What's yours?...;)
@pduffy4 Thank you, I did indeed :) And yes, I so agree. Science should be pushing the boundaries of what is possible, not getting stuck in the boundaries as we see happening so often these days. But all in good timing as personal evolution takes its course ;)
Thanks, I thought I'd seen all Tom Campbell videos, there seems to be more popping up recently, which is great. Now if only we could get those poor people being brainwashed by project Camelot/Avalon, to start watching more accurate honest and useful information.
AlkPacino 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams.
Sphere1957 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
Sphere1957 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
Sphere1957 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
Sphere1957 4 days ago
Evita, I enjoyed this to hear Tom, but enjoyed seeing you in it just as much, wish I were younger, you were single and we could meet but dreams be dreams...
Sphere1957 4 days ago
I'm confused still, if his big toe were true, and if my whole experience is always the most probable, how could there be any change at all? I mean, how does what's most probable become less probable; wouldn't what's most probable right now, perpetuate itself? I've got this feeling that, what he believes to be consistent probability, is rather constant uncertainty. Does that make any sense..? Maybe you could help clear some of my confusion on his theory or point of view. :)
tonyfalca 1 week ago
@tonyfalca Good question! What is most probable is dependent on a set of things, which are constantly dynamic, changing and evolving. We have to consider that the system itself is set up to evolve, the very nature of change. So while it is most probable that you will see a tree with green leaves in the spring, it is most probable that you will see one with no leaves in the winter. That is a basic example. In your own life, it depends on your personal evolution, etc.. (does that help?)
EvitaOchel 1 week ago
@EvitaOchel Let's see if I can reword my confusion. Like you've mentioned, it's most probable that we would see a tree with green leaves in the spring, and with no leaves in the winter, since this happens every year, over and over. Considering that, of course we would assume it's the most probable, but what about the very first tree on Earth -- wouldn't we then assume the very first tree on Earth acted in the same way, and if so, why would have that been most probable back then?
tonyfalca 1 week ago
@tonyfalca I hope that made sense. I know I'd written a lot just now, yet it felt like I said very, very little if nothing at all... lol. Talking in circles.
tonyfalca 1 week ago
@EvitaOchel [Sorry for the spam of comments.] Your tree example though, that was exactly the point I was trying to make in my first comment. The annual cycle of trees is most probable because, let's assume, it happens over and over and it's therefore self-enforcing; the most probable perpetuates itself beyond change, for the most part, like how the cycle of trees is seemingly fixed.
tonyfalca 1 week ago
Interesting vid!
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
nickharvey7 1 week ago
Just as an addition, the fact that your books are available on pirate channels, is actually a complement ;-)
infinitesimotel 2 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
Excellent video, I nearly missed this one, perish the thought.
infinitesimotel 2 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
Awesomely awesome. I think I have watched pretty much all of Tom´s lectures on YouTube. I have learned something from every one of them. That being said, I SO appreciated the piece about expressing who we are by what we do and seeing ourselves as part of a bigger plan in relation to upcoming paradigm shifts. Thank you Tom for doing what you do, your have been vital to my "growing up"! Thank you Evita for an eloquent interview.
HSIves1 1 month ago in playlist Tom Campbell : The Nature of Reality
@HSIves1 You are so welcome, and thank you for the awesome feedback :)
EvitaOchel 1 week ago
I started off as a BS Chem E. I did research for the Department of Energy at Lawrence Berkeley Labs. I loved the scientific method. When I went to medical school, I was shocked at how variable the results were compared to the physical sciences. I love how he connects the paranormal to scientific with the placebo effect and double blind randomized studies. So glad to be turned on to this subject, and can't wait to see episodes two and three. Kudos to you both : )
77picklehead 1 month ago
wow the live podcasts are the greatests... im always fascinated by Monroe Ins, there are so many experiences in that field from so many people; we've been turned into automatons and isolated from this kind of teachings.
JazzChrissPL 1 month ago
Every year new, short-lived elementary particles are discovered. Frequently their
existence is predicted before their discovery. It has been seriously suggested that these
particles are being produced, rather than discovered, by the sustained mental efforts of
physicist around the world. Although we have been conditioned to accept naive
realism by our scientifically based education, such an idea cannot be dismissed out of
hand.
Professor A.J. Ellison
whitenightf3 1 month ago
@whitenightf3 Nice quote from Arthur Ellison, thank you! He was the epitome of an open-minded scientist,like Tom Campbell, a professor of electrical engineering, and served on the council of the British Society for Psychical Research and also the early advisory board of The Monroe Institute. If he were still with us, he would be right in there with Tom and MBT!
Westwoodii 2 weeks ago
Thanks for the opportunity to watch this. Nice job :)
snodart 1 month ago
@snodart You are most welcome and thanks for the feedback!
EvitaOchel 1 week ago
Great interview, great upload, thank you! This was a pleasure to watch, now I'm moving onto Part 2 =D
HueyTheDoctor87 1 month ago
@HueyTheDoctor87 Awesome to hear, and thank you!
EvitaOchel 1 week ago
Hey Evita: So glad you posted this interview with Thomas. I have followed his work for some time also and LOVE what he has to say. I have asked him questions and he is always very gracious with him time and answers. He is a "for real" modern mystic and scientist who has satisfying answers on just about any subject one could pose. He has given me a real faith about the afterlife. And...you are lovely as usual!!!
rovingdesertfox 1 month ago
@rovingdesertfox You are so welcome! I think Tom's work is so valuable and spans across every area of life in the physical and spiritual in such an elegant and clear way. And I agree with all that you shared - very awesome observation - thank you for your supportive comment :)
EvitaOchel 1 month ago
Great discussion! Looking forward to parts 2 and 3. Thank you so much.
vasoula2908 1 month ago
@vasoula2908 Thank you for your feedback - part 2 and 3 are now available.
EvitaOchel 1 month ago
Evita, what a cool interview; you are very good at what you do! As the interview progressed, it was also funny to watch Tom virtually 'unrender' before our eyes in the video!
whitehawk22 1 month ago
@whitehawk22 Thank you for your feedback and comment. So encouraging to read :) And yes, I am glad you pointed that out in terms of "Tom's un-rendering" I thought that was so neat too in its timing!
EvitaOchel 1 month ago
The Spirit is our REAL (heavenly) FATHER...and until we(His children) didn't find Him, we do not deserve to control anything(inherit The Kingdom)...otherwise we wouldn't (be able to)appreciate the enormous amount of wisdom/love invested in ALL THAT IS... FOR well, you see, THE FATHER (the creator) IS OUR REAL IDENTITY...beyond the veil of the matrix(the virtual illusion)...and,YES!...:)...WE ARE THE ONE WE'RE (so desperately) LOOKING FOR...:)... May you Be Blessed and FREE...:)... ♥Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ♥
zalmos12 1 month ago 12
@zalmos12 Thank you for sharing your views.
EvitaOchel 1 month ago
we cannot EVER create ANYTHING unless we're in accordance with The Spirit that animates and binds all things in existence, and THAT(the spirit) WILL CREATE IT FOR YOU(but ONLY if /when necessary)... All we can(EVER) do is to understand this simple LAW... :) ... Find The Spirit within, stop the false identifying of your-self with the ego(the shell), merge with the Spirit and then you'll see what I mean...;)...
zalmos12 1 month ago 13
Well, there are two major ways of understanding that:1- The long run(the large path) is the path of spiraling through the matrix in the cycles of events suffering the metamorphosis and the low awakening- that takes countless billions of (that which we call)years of quiet or noisy so called evolution, and 2:The short(narrow) path of the blade- the path of giving up the illusion and AWAKE from the amnesia- it's the path of the ascended masters(the saints)...Anyone has the choice.What's yours?...;)
zalmos12 1 month ago 10
Comment removed
zalmos12 1 month ago
"Most of us are irrational. Most of us live by our beliefs rather by any kind of logic, and what passes for logic is certainty of belief."
-Tom Campbell
ryanjacoshenk 1 month ago
Hi Evita,
I hope you had a very nice Christmas and New Year.
It always pleases me to listen to open minded scientists, wish there were more like them.
pduffy4 1 month ago
@pduffy4 Thank you, I did indeed :) And yes, I so agree. Science should be pushing the boundaries of what is possible, not getting stuck in the boundaries as we see happening so often these days. But all in good timing as personal evolution takes its course ;)
EvitaOchel 1 month ago