@SparkHID1 hahahahaha lllllllloooollllllllll 321 hp vs 130, over 300 Torque vs. 140, but clearly, 5,6 vs 8,6 0-100, Hondas HP and Torque have other rules.......dream forward!!!!!!!!!!laberbacke
@SparkHID1 hahahahaha lllllllloooollllllllll 321 hp vs 130, over 300 Torque vs. 140, but clearly,same Turns/min, 5,6 vs 8,6 0-100, Hondas HP and Torque have other rules.;)......dream forward!!!!!!!!! laberer
@jb199477 ur an ill informed, ignorant , naive don't know much talk too much fuckwit..... period! hahaha and anybody who thinks that american cars can beat jap tuners in handling is delirious!
fwd sucks at handling if you CANT drive my probe handled like it was on rail and from the factory can handle more g's than your gay beamer..bmws are for girls and gays
im tired of all these gay hondas. they are nothing but a high speed gokart with a piece of aluminum foil shaped into a body. Get a real performance car an quit fucking with these pieces of shit. In my opinion hondas are for people who cant afford real quality performance cars.
@Ejan81 no I dont try fucking cornering one of those bitches at high speed and tell me how dizzy you are when you stop spinning RWD owns the road when it comes to real races with corners especially the BMW
@Ejan81 hoes that ive Owned 2 integras and i currently own a 03 328i. my integra spun out on me three times coming off the high way at around 80 i can do 110 in my beamer and nothin happens. so on the contrary i know what im talking about do YOU?
i have owned a Integra Type R so yes i know what im talking about....my conclusion is that you suck at driving or that your Integra hade some serious chassi problems or bad tyres..Integras are rock solid i handling and spinning out in 80 is just bullshit if it is a healthy car with a good driver...case closed dont ruin the comments with troll-talk please
@Ejan81 some how all i could make out on the last comment was. BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT i don't know what the fuck im talking about because i cant even tell an M3 from a 325/328. and BTW both integra's i owned were in immaculate condition the fact of the matter is you cant let two wheels provide power& steering. its a bad design. i like integra's but they cant handle for shit . and yeah i can drive
it is not a bad design...put an DC2 Integra Type R against your 328 on track and see what happens..the tegg will put that 328 to shame in accerelation och handling with ease....two wheels can provide power and steering without any problems at all if you are a decent driver
@jb1994777 hmmm, my beemer spun out while changing lanes in slight rain going maybe 30.... and when going 100+ i felt like if i hardly turned it would spin and flip... now i have a 07 vw rabbit and it feels alot better slowing down from 130 getting off the high way... and i have an 02 cl and it felt like it handled alot better then my beemer... but i would say on track the beemer would of been better cuz no lose of power when turning and if you lose control its alot eazyer to fix
@turbotdi2002 BMW: Beat My Wehicle :-D :-D :-D so I CAN (yeah, okay vehicle, but its mixed up half german half english) BMW is like...uhhh ahhh I don't know how to express, enunciate that...just like dump
The E36 M3 has only 2 pipes at the end. The E46 starts with 4 pipes! I think a genuine M3. The 3.0 l has about 280 bhp en the 3.2 l has 321 bhp. I owned a 321 bhp version M3. Very nice...
@psp271seb3 it's fake 100%. i love german cars waaaaaaaaaaa especially VW :P waaa man i would like to live in Germany :D Germany is #1 in whole world with engineering,quality,safety, beautiness. Everything that is connected with making cars. Germany will always be in my heart! greetz from Croatia :D
ya, i don't know. it kinda doesn't look like an M3 either. kinda shorter than most of them (bad camera angle?)... anyone know which body style/ year it is?
u gotta be kidding me. everyone could go and buy (or steal) the bumpers, wheels and those shitty badges. if the engine isnt an M3, whats the point in having a car that only looks like a great thing, but is rather shitty? fuck german cars anyway, honda will always be better ;]
German cars- designed for fat fucks that need a smooth ride to the doughnut shop... they have more sensors and wires than the Nissan plant in each car... fuck german, i rather drive a ford... and i rather walk barefooted across the desert than drive a ford
@terrordrone7 ya mum < Honda :-P but okay, you are right but does it matters??? We're looking for some races down the miles and you are talking about technic... never mind
Hondas r underrated ,cool m3 tho...it was a close 1.... E u down there...
"akabadumbass1984"...U always post hater remarks of Honda saying they suck...obviously u have no life n envy Honda ...goes to prove that haters make us famous...
1)LOL! Hondas are OVERRATED & have been since the 1st Fast & Furious movie. I mean, let's face the facts. Torque plays a humongous part in performance but you Honda idiots seek only horsepower.
2)I don't envy Hondas, I HATE them w/a Satanic passion. However, to each his own. But it doesn't become 'his own' when every Carlos & Pablo has one.
3)Hondas FUCKING SUCK. Torqueless cars that you have to shift like 10x to keep up w/traffic can suck my dick.
power and and a good gearbox with a gear-ratio that make use of the powerband is all that matters...torque is only needed if you wanna pull from low revs or high gears....
normally when u seek horsepower u gain some torque aswell did shit
and i doubt your gonna get a bucket load of torwue froma 1.6 vtec motor
and also... the reason theyre light compared to some equal cars on the market is so when you gain more power... torque isnt really a big problem... especially seen as most videos on youtube show hondas shitting on much bigger motor'd cars
you were born in 1984 right?
your a lil old to be hating on cars on youtube... go buy 1
1)Yes but without significant TQ, there is no significant performance or acceleration.
2)Believe it or not, stock Volvos KILL modded Hondas on the street. Trust me, TQ is significant no matter what application is used. This is why Hondas are slower than pretty much everyone else when un-modified.
3)I have a car, smartass & it's much better than some stupid Honda.
1)LOL! I own a Subaru Legacy & a Volvo 850 GLT. They will be sleepers in their own right when the time comes.
2)Volvo V70-T5Rs come w/240hp/250ft-lbs stock. They are pretty quick. 850-T5Rs come w/240hp/240ft-lbs. Both use the same B5234T motor but used differently tuned ECUs. 850 Turbos-T5s (222hp) use the same motor but the ECU is tuned to put out even lower boost. W/these cars, all you need is a chip tune & an exhaust & you're @ 300whp. The intake does not need to be modified like most cars.
@akabane1984 Hondas are good cars, not good low end, being as how they have no torque but you modify them and tweak them enough high range they're little monsters. Maybe you should come up with reasons before you go running your mouth next time faggot.
.1:Yes, going faster in a straight line is fun....for about 30 seconds before it gets boring. Having no TQ means that they are not fun to drive. I should know. I've driven a Civic Si for a month & HATED it's lack of power.
2:Throw 10K at a Civic then do the same to an Impreza. Even though they'll both be monsters, the difference between them will be vast. It's okay if you like Hondas but you gotta know what's superior to it, just as a Ferrari is superior to a Subaru.
@akabane1984 Sure tell that to the CRX racers that race on a circut track with cars twice the power and the wieght. Have you been in a CRX that goes on Tracks like willow Springs probably not? Not only that But you guys dont get the whole concept of the CRX type of cars. Anytime there is performance you have to think about wieght. Wieght is the greatest enemy.
1:I know what power to weight ratio is. I own a fairly light car for it's brand. TQ is still important on & off the track. CRXs are light & have a platform setup for sporty handling to make up for it's lack of power.
2:I get the concept of a CRX but there is so much you can do with a car that small. At some point, safety & stability will have to be paid attention to & the CRX has neither. I should know, I've driven a CRX many times.
@akabane1984 Safety! What a roll cage cant get you safely down the track and some upper strut bars? Maybe even bigger brakes? How much more safe can you be. TQ when it comes to small CRX with the little TQ it has and its small and tight gearing on the YS1 you dont need all that TQ to move those cars. I know I have two of them. I also have an 88 Supra with the 1JZ so I know about rear and front. Rears are fun to drive and all of that but its different.
1:I'm talking about stock but even with a roll cage, you're still limited to what you can do in a FWD car, which is why people usually own more than 1 car for different purposes. Even you have to admit that there are certain things the Supra can do that the CRX can't. Not saying that it's bad because hell, a CRX>Civic many times over.
2:YS1? I'm guessing you have a B16A Si. NOW you're talking about a good car. I was referring to the SOHCs that everyone keeps hyping up. Should have been clear.
@akabane1984 Yeah I own the two CRXs one has the b16A SI YS1 with the higher Comp ratios and the very tight transmission and LSD it puts out 158 to the wheel and can pull 14.2 on the big 17 inch wheels I have. The other is my daily driver 1.5 liter SOHC. Its slow but still fun to drive. The B16A though can rip thru the 1/4 miles nicely though. The Sup is about a bit faster but not by much.
@akabane1984 Your way off on everything even your expression of your hatred for them in vile ways. God built my CRX to crush your BMW!
My freind at work is on his third E30 since once they reach a certain age mechanically its downhill from there and he cant afford the maintance on them all that while my CRX keeps going on and going and going.
1:LOL! Your CRX BETTER keep going! Those B engines are practically immortal even if you thrash them. I hate Hondas but I gotta state the facts. Those engines can RUN.
2:I don't know too much about E30s except that they can be costly but reliable if they are taken care of.
@jbrunner122 hey asshole before you go around calling people dumb get your facts straight because the fast and the furious had honda civics which were at the beginning of the movie driving under the big rigs and shit and there was another race with the jetta against an s2000.
BMW rules the streets, for all of you who own hondas "Honda is toy piece of shit car:, i have a 92 325is stock and i smoked a 1998 honda civic with a JDM upgrade including short ram intake and a supercharger, with DC headers. we raced in Long Beach . MPOWER RULES the World
Most BMW owners or fans I know are total douchebags. They think they are better than everybody else on the road. I like BMW because of the engine & comfort not the status symbol. I like Honda cause they make the best I4 N/A engines in the planet. I own a 09 135I and 05 S2000. Don't disrespect, appreciate.
Nice try but you're comparing one of Honda's weaker engines that comes from a CRV which is non VTEC but still comparable or better than the engines you mentioned above.
B20 (146bhp/133tq)
EJ22 (142bhp/149tq) Not that impressive considering it has 200cc's more than the B20. Larger displacement helps the torque though.
SR20(140bhp/~130tq) Comparable but B20 still has slightly more peek hp similar torque.
I wont even mention B16/B18 Type R, K20, H22, F20/22C
It isn't about the the level of power, it's how EARLY the power comes on. That's what determines acceleration. Here's an N/A for you.
EJ20-190 bhp @ 6000rpm:190lb·ft@3800rpm.
Bring up the Type R. It funny how you think that hp is everything when Honda fans have to resort to swapping in & combining the B20 bottom end with other B heads for more torque. The reason why nobody likes Honda motors is because of their severe lack of torque, even @ high rpm.
There's no way an EJ20 N/A (JDM spec or not) will make 190 lb/ft of torque even with variable valve timing. Even it's big brother EJ25 with larger displacement only tops around 170 lb/ft. Unless somehow it's diesel, boosted, or stroked. Don't confuse between torque and n/m (newton meters) numbers. 190 n/m = 140 lb/ft of torque. Subaru's should stick with turbo.
The JDM N/A EJ20 makes 190hp-190lb-ft. You don't know what you're talking about. Look it up for your self. I know the difference between newton metres & torque. I'm not an idiot. Like I said before, it's not about how much power is being made but how early it comes on. No Honda engine can compete with Subaru in terms of power delivery. In other words, you don't need to rev an EJ to get power out of it. You need to rev a B or a K motor for any kind of response. That's why EJ>K or B motor.
An N/A EJ will have it's torque available @ a much lower rpm than a B or K motor ever will.
Btw EJ254 N/A: 175hp-195lb-ft. Hondas don't even come CLOSE to the power delivery or efficiency to an EJ N/A. Horsepower isn't everything. Torque is what gets you off the line & around a track.
Well I don't know what you're watching then because about 90% of the videos on here shows Subaru crushing Honda with merciless force.
Even boosted Hondas can't compete with boosted Subarus! LOL!
It's funny how you keep changing your Subaru engines every time I make a comment on it cause you can't make up your mind. Last time I check Impreza RS 2.5 with your EJ254 only does 170 lb-ft. of torque. Funny how you say how boosted Subarus beat boosted Hondas which is the other way around. Search for "TOPSETUP EG6 vs XS WRX". This shows a fully modded WRX with racing slicks can't even shake off a front wheel drive Civic K20A N/A from a touge which is pathetic.
First off, I was talking about EJ motors in general so don't try to correct me.
Secondly, the USDM RS 2.5 has all of the emissions crap that notoriously drops power. Put a free flowing exhaust & intake & you will instantly see the number I have presented.
Third, You've got it ALL wrong. Most boosted Subaru OWN boosted Hondas & it's all over YouTube. Don't get me wrong, Honda is a great car but it's GREATLY overrated.
Fourth, no Honda motor can match a Subaru motor in efficiency & power delivery.
1)I won't correct you if you don't overate your torque #'s
2)I don't even think Japan uses EJ25 yet. It's made specifically for the US market. Japan still use EJ20 and make similar power. No intake or exhaust will boost hp & tq #'s especially on I4 and H4 N/A engines.
3)Honda's are not overrated but underestimated cause they make cheap reliable cars. I type in K20 vs STI, S2K vs STI, Civic VS STI, etc. 9/10 videos I see Hondas winning but u won't care anyway so why bother?
1)My #s are correct & taken straight from Subaru ;)
2)I never said they did. Please keep up with the conversation. However, an intake & exhaust WILL boost power & torque to a small degree.
3)Honda are hated because they are seen as fast when they're really not. (Lack of torque, if you didn't get it the 1st time), BTW, You're lying out your ass. Most of the videos show Subaru tearing a new one in Honda & you know it.
4)That's FACT. No Honda motor matches a Subaru. Only a retard would think that.
By the way, can't use one win to justify losing that many times against Subaru. That's like saying "you might beat me 9 out of 10 times but I beat you once so I win!" That doesn't make any sense. It's pretty much stained all over YouTube of Subaru stomping Honda's ass in. You may get a few potent NSXs & S2Ks but more often than not, Subaru ftw.
You're smoking CRACK if you think ANY Honda motor is better than an SR or an EJ. These motors make sufficient torque @ low rpm & they were placed in lightweight bodies similar to Honda. Type in Subaru v.s. Honda on YouTube & see Honda get crushed by it's superior. Trust me, Honda motors don't even come CLOSE to the build quality or response that Subaru motors are built with.
Trust me I like Nissan SR20 and Subarus EJ20 but they require turbo to be fast. All those Subaru VS Honda video's I've seen them all. Overtakes and overtaken. But it takes a boosted Subaru to compete an N/A Honda.
catchup and smoked it ..crx=crappey rice box... get a clue and a real car .. forreal it even has dual exhaust tips thats some serious rice buisness...
It is a given, you have more quality in any BMW. you could never compare any Honda to a BMW...
as for this video at the end of the day..
The BMW is going to be a better smoother ride and comfy seats....
fuck status... no one has status unless you're driving the most expensive car in the world... otherwise you're just like the next man down.... no status accept wanna B's...
Along with that comes high quality, etc. which gives it a good reputation.
As for the BMW being a better quality car, it depends. My Honda is probably more luxurious than the BMW in the video, as it is a '08 model whereas the BMW in the video is like 1995 w/ ricer headlights and taillights.
Oh, and if you want comfy seats, you should've gotten a Mercedes Benz, not a BMW.
hey guys the m3 was 3.0 286hp until 96 and the motor was single vanos and from 96 bmw posted the new motor which was 3.2 321hp and this motor was double vanos
both were good,,,,
TheHaziqshah 3 months ago
@MrDontmention
That's what I'm thinking too.
KolikJe 4 months ago
320hp and 1340kg car vs 150hp and 970kg car...there's no race here -.-'
hondaorido 8 months ago
@hondaorido ED9 has only 130 HP, EE9 is the one with 150 HP
no wonder the Honda lost
MyDarkMe 6 months ago
Not bad for a 1.6
hondaresan 8 months ago
crx have got to be the gayest car built
55okrM2 11 months ago
have fun going in a straight line i guess?
tyr0newilliams 11 months ago
honda zawsze wygrywa...zawsze będzie lepsza od bmw chociaż ma mniejszą pojemność
adrian16valve 1 year ago
@adrian16valve szkoda ze nie skręca.
enduroknz 1 year ago
@adrian16valve przeciez przegrala slepy jestes ?
iwansondzieckoboga 1 year ago
look, there is absolutely no way frwd is better than rwd, bmw's hold the road better than any shity honda integra, especially a 328 or m3, take it :D
boofypatrovits 1 year ago
@boofypatrovits FWD>RWD
cg61000 1 year ago
i leave e36 m3s hide me in my rear view mirror with my old ass 91 crx w/ swap b16a1 stock lol
SparkHID1 1 year ago
@SparkHID1 hahahahaha lllllllloooollllllllll 321 hp vs 130, over 300 Torque vs. 140, but clearly, 5,6 vs 8,6 0-100, Hondas HP and Torque have other rules.......dream forward!!!!!!!!!!laberbacke
diegohnx 1 year ago
@SparkHID1 hahahahaha lllllllloooollllllllll 321 hp vs 130, over 300 Torque vs. 140, but clearly,same Turns/min, 5,6 vs 8,6 0-100, Hondas HP and Torque have other rules.;)......dream forward!!!!!!!!! laberer
diegohnx 1 year ago
bmw > crx on straight line, crx on slalom = king
boobmasteris 1 year ago
@boobmasteris
fwd sux
07lopez 1 year ago
@07lopez fwd with good driver kicks asses
boobmasteris 1 year ago
@boobmasteris
lol
07lopez 1 year ago
both didn't start good
thegreenkrss 1 year ago
ed9 :)) i love crx ;D
marekezg 1 year ago
For the love of god can anybody launch cars anymore????
RX7RotaryPower 1 year ago
M3 won. However, you have to admit, the CRX is a great little platform as power to weight ratios play a lot into racing.
chiodeguate1 1 year ago
M-POWER
kamaro100 1 year ago
@jb199477 ur an ill informed, ignorant , naive don't know much talk too much fuckwit..... period! hahaha and anybody who thinks that american cars can beat jap tuners in handling is delirious!
MyTipsi 1 year ago
fwd sucks at handling if you CANT drive my probe handled like it was on rail and from the factory can handle more g's than your gay beamer..bmws are for girls and gays
patgrm 1 year ago
who? won
MrSENORLOS 1 year ago
who needs a shitload of torque in a 900 kg car?
rotterdamovie86 1 year ago
im tired of all these gay hondas. they are nothing but a high speed gokart with a piece of aluminum foil shaped into a body. Get a real performance car an quit fucking with these pieces of shit. In my opinion hondas are for people who cant afford real quality performance cars.
rome8790 1 year ago
@rome8790 yes but good quality and fast..
mulalamuhaha 1 year ago
aaaaaaaaaahahahahaaaaaaaaaa^^
vollgas83 1 year ago
he obviously knows nothin because honda are amiaizng car its not up for arguement !!
oldboi1 1 year ago
Crx is a drivers car, m3 is shit, fuck americans
mcrrulez124 1 year ago
@mcrrulez124 A FWD is never a drivers car.....
Well a girl drivers car
turbotdi2002 1 year ago
@turbotdi2002
So you dont call a Integra Type R a drivers car ??? if not then you haven´t driven one.
Ejan81 1 year ago 14
@Ejan81 no I dont try fucking cornering one of those bitches at high speed and tell me how dizzy you are when you stop spinning RWD owns the road when it comes to real races with corners especially the BMW
jb1994777 1 year ago
@jb1994777
you dont know what you are talking about...makes me laugh though
Ejan81 1 year ago
@Ejan81 hoes that ive Owned 2 integras and i currently own a 03 328i. my integra spun out on me three times coming off the high way at around 80 i can do 110 in my beamer and nothin happens. so on the contrary i know what im talking about do YOU?
jb1994777 1 year ago
@jb1994777
i have owned a Integra Type R so yes i know what im talking about....my conclusion is that you suck at driving or that your Integra hade some serious chassi problems or bad tyres..Integras are rock solid i handling and spinning out in 80 is just bullshit if it is a healthy car with a good driver...case closed dont ruin the comments with troll-talk please
Ejan81 1 year ago
@Ejan81 some how all i could make out on the last comment was. BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT i don't know what the fuck im talking about because i cant even tell an M3 from a 325/328. and BTW both integra's i owned were in immaculate condition the fact of the matter is you cant let two wheels provide power& steering. its a bad design. i like integra's but they cant handle for shit . and yeah i can drive
jb1994777 1 year ago
@jb1994777
it is not a bad design...put an DC2 Integra Type R against your 328 on track and see what happens..the tegg will put that 328 to shame in accerelation och handling with ease....two wheels can provide power and steering without any problems at all if you are a decent driver
Ejan81 1 year ago 2
@jb1994777 well u obviously don't know shit because the Integra was one of the best handling front wheel drive cars for quite a few years.
dids28 1 year ago
@jb1994777 well u obviously don't know shit because the Integra was one of the best handling front wheel drive cars for quite a few years.
dids28 1 year ago
@jb1994777 hmmm, my beemer spun out while changing lanes in slight rain going maybe 30.... and when going 100+ i felt like if i hardly turned it would spin and flip... now i have a 07 vw rabbit and it feels alot better slowing down from 130 getting off the high way... and i have an 02 cl and it felt like it handled alot better then my beemer... but i would say on track the beemer would of been better cuz no lose of power when turning and if you lose control its alot eazyer to fix
zeata12 1 year ago
@mcrrulez124 M3 is german...
U failed in life
turbotdi2002 1 year ago 4
@turbotdi2002 he meant, Bmw M3 over Honda stupid
Aaendewy8D 1 year ago
@turbotdi2002 BMW: Beat My Wehicle :-D :-D :-D so I CAN (yeah, okay vehicle, but its mixed up half german half english) BMW is like...uhhh ahhh I don't know how to express, enunciate that...just like dump
TeeWeeQcKsteel 2 months ago
not an expert racer here but wasn't that a slow start from both of them?
Visarex 2 years ago
The E36 M3 has only 2 pipes at the end. The E46 starts with 4 pipes! I think a genuine M3. The 3.0 l has about 280 bhp en the 3.2 l has 321 bhp. I owned a 321 bhp version M3. Very nice...
kjoetie2 2 years ago
When the CRX is tuned, then it is an M3
A friend here in Austria, drives a INTEGRA DC2 tuned to 270PS at the wheel!
1 / 4 Mile: 13.01!
Semir1992 2 years ago
das kann kein m sein weil alle m´s 4er auspuff anlage haben
TheSubwoofer95 2 years ago
This seems to be a fake. Or not a real m3 but a 320i or something.
I really like the crx (probably getting one in the next 3 months) but I can't think it is that fast..
Greetz from Germany
psp271seb3 2 years ago
@psp271seb3 it's fake 100%. i love german cars waaaaaaaaaaa especially VW :P waaa man i would like to live in Germany :D Germany is #1 in whole world with engineering,quality,safety, beautiness. Everything that is connected with making cars. Germany will always be in my heart! greetz from Croatia :D
dsito2 2 years ago
you forgot to mention heaviness, poor fuel economy and having big engines for nothing. but hey every body has their own opinion
MRJDMASFUCK 1 year ago
5/5 video aggregate to my chanell ! me subcribi subcribite en mi canal
rap25gr 2 years ago
it did not bad considering its a 1.6 and bmw is atleast a 2.5
dingo882 2 years ago
The BMW is not necessarily a 2.5 or more. They come with less displacement then 2.5 especially the E36s
shawnheather323i 2 years ago
Ha. Honda never had a chance. At least any fwd honda. As much as i hate honda, i will admit the s2000 isnt bad.
iknowcarsbetterthanu 2 years ago
honda does sucks all the way!!!
CAMARO RULES
DenverDee303 2 years ago
@DenverDee303 camaro rules? hahahahaha just put a camaro vs honda NSX u´ll see who´s the boss. and yeah american muscle it´s just a wasting fuel
colinIG 1 year ago
@colinIG BMW p.o.s Honda p.o.s MUSTANG & CAMARO ALL DAY!!!!
DenverDee303 1 year ago
ooh yaa m3 power!
svrle65 2 years ago
any 1 else think that didnt sound like an m3...more like a 325i to me
decky5151 2 years ago
ya, i don't know. it kinda doesn't look like an M3 either. kinda shorter than most of them (bad camera angle?)... anyone know which body style/ year it is?
gts205 2 years ago
It's an M3, look at the badge on the back, the front bumper and wheels are specific to the also M version of the car.
1992-1999 E36
nickmarynissen 2 years ago
@nickmarynissen
u gotta be kidding me. everyone could go and buy (or steal) the bumpers, wheels and those shitty badges. if the engine isnt an M3, whats the point in having a car that only looks like a great thing, but is rather shitty? fuck german cars anyway, honda will always be better ;]
sicfucka 1 year ago
hondas and fords blow big ones. hondas are just toys and for german cars to be for fat fucks they do a hella alot better then jdm shit cars.
VcottntailW 2 years ago
wuts the matter cant afford a M3 poor thing
CAPTAINCAPSLOCKZ 2 years ago
German cars- designed for fat fucks that need a smooth ride to the doughnut shop... they have more sensors and wires than the Nissan plant in each car... fuck german, i rather drive a ford... and i rather walk barefooted across the desert than drive a ford
samuraibeaner 2 years ago
you obviously got a chip on your shoulder!
I own BMW e36 M3 euro spec with 321bhp! Its amazing and I'm not fat and neither do I eat doughnuts!
I also own a s2000! the are both rwd cars with great balance and handling!
hepburn212 2 years ago 3
surely mum and dad couldnt afford both those cars!
your talking out you arse, only thing you drive is yer granny's pishbike
Scottydoo69 2 years ago
That's not even mentioning the later S60R/V70R. They carry the same engine but w/variable valve timing & put out 300hp.
akabane1984 2 years ago
both slow as fuck
DakMode 2 years ago
E36 M3 > Honda
XxXgt0dbXxX 2 years ago 11
@XxXgt0dbXxX I agree
turbotdi2002 1 year ago
@XxXgt0dbXxX Disagree
cg61000 1 year ago
@XxXgt0dbXxX technically
BMW > Honda
terrordrone7 6 months ago
@terrordrone7 ya mum < Honda :-P but okay, you are right but does it matters??? We're looking for some races down the miles and you are talking about technic... never mind
TeeWeeQcKsteel 2 months ago
Hondas r underrated ,cool m3 tho...it was a close 1.... E u down there...
"akabadumbass1984"...U always post hater remarks of Honda saying they suck...obviously u have no life n envy Honda ...goes to prove that haters make us famous...
Honda r fucken...dope!
B3336t333n 2 years ago
1)LOL! Hondas are OVERRATED & have been since the 1st Fast & Furious movie. I mean, let's face the facts. Torque plays a humongous part in performance but you Honda idiots seek only horsepower.
2)I don't envy Hondas, I HATE them w/a Satanic passion. However, to each his own. But it doesn't become 'his own' when every Carlos & Pablo has one.
3)Hondas FUCKING SUCK. Torqueless cars that you have to shift like 10x to keep up w/traffic can suck my dick.
4)You can HAVE torqueless Honda garbage.
akabane1984 2 years ago
you are way off...torque is NOT everything
power and and a good gearbox with a gear-ratio that make use of the powerband is all that matters...torque is only needed if you wanna pull from low revs or high gears....
Ejan81 2 years ago 3
1)Torque is needed for various things, like resisting the wind gusts, pulling @ high speed, pulling out of corners, & accelerating from a dead stop.
2)You're right about the need for torque for low revs & high gears as those factors are also involved in acceleration.
akabane1984 2 years ago
exactly
lingazin 2 years ago
normally when u seek horsepower u gain some torque aswell did shit
and i doubt your gonna get a bucket load of torwue froma 1.6 vtec motor
and also... the reason theyre light compared to some equal cars on the market is so when you gain more power... torque isnt really a big problem... especially seen as most videos on youtube show hondas shitting on much bigger motor'd cars
you were born in 1984 right?
your a lil old to be hating on cars on youtube... go buy 1
d0g0k 2 years ago
1)Yes but without significant TQ, there is no significant performance or acceleration.
2)Believe it or not, stock Volvos KILL modded Hondas on the street. Trust me, TQ is significant no matter what application is used. This is why Hondas are slower than pretty much everyone else when un-modified.
3)I have a car, smartass & it's much better than some stupid Honda.
akabane1984 2 years ago
what u drivin then? and proof?
what stock volvos... without overboosting?
d0g0k 2 years ago
1)LOL! I own a Subaru Legacy & a Volvo 850 GLT. They will be sleepers in their own right when the time comes.
2)Volvo V70-T5Rs come w/240hp/250ft-lbs stock. They are pretty quick. 850-T5Rs come w/240hp/240ft-lbs. Both use the same B5234T motor but used differently tuned ECUs. 850 Turbos-T5s (222hp) use the same motor but the ECU is tuned to put out even lower boost. W/these cars, all you need is a chip tune & an exhaust & you're @ 300whp. The intake does not need to be modified like most cars.
akabane1984 2 years ago
@akabane1984 youtubecom/watch?v=QzP-etuL6Y8
BoomMelonshot 1 year ago
Your point? I could stuff a EJ257 in my Legacy, throw a 150 shot in it, & do the same thing to a Lambo.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@akabane1984 Hondas are good cars, not good low end, being as how they have no torque but you modify them and tweak them enough high range they're little monsters. Maybe you should come up with reasons before you go running your mouth next time faggot.
slipknotfanx328 1 year ago
.1:Yes, going faster in a straight line is fun....for about 30 seconds before it gets boring. Having no TQ means that they are not fun to drive. I should know. I've driven a Civic Si for a month & HATED it's lack of power.
2:Throw 10K at a Civic then do the same to an Impreza. Even though they'll both be monsters, the difference between them will be vast. It's okay if you like Hondas but you gotta know what's superior to it, just as a Ferrari is superior to a Subaru.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@akabane1984 Sure tell that to the CRX racers that race on a circut track with cars twice the power and the wieght. Have you been in a CRX that goes on Tracks like willow Springs probably not? Not only that But you guys dont get the whole concept of the CRX type of cars. Anytime there is performance you have to think about wieght. Wieght is the greatest enemy.
SBFHawk1 1 year ago
1:I know what power to weight ratio is. I own a fairly light car for it's brand. TQ is still important on & off the track. CRXs are light & have a platform setup for sporty handling to make up for it's lack of power.
2:I get the concept of a CRX but there is so much you can do with a car that small. At some point, safety & stability will have to be paid attention to & the CRX has neither. I should know, I've driven a CRX many times.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@akabane1984 Safety! What a roll cage cant get you safely down the track and some upper strut bars? Maybe even bigger brakes? How much more safe can you be. TQ when it comes to small CRX with the little TQ it has and its small and tight gearing on the YS1 you dont need all that TQ to move those cars. I know I have two of them. I also have an 88 Supra with the 1JZ so I know about rear and front. Rears are fun to drive and all of that but its different.
SBFHawk1 1 year ago
1:I'm talking about stock but even with a roll cage, you're still limited to what you can do in a FWD car, which is why people usually own more than 1 car for different purposes. Even you have to admit that there are certain things the Supra can do that the CRX can't. Not saying that it's bad because hell, a CRX>Civic many times over.
2:YS1? I'm guessing you have a B16A Si. NOW you're talking about a good car. I was referring to the SOHCs that everyone keeps hyping up. Should have been clear.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@akabane1984 Yeah I own the two CRXs one has the b16A SI YS1 with the higher Comp ratios and the very tight transmission and LSD it puts out 158 to the wheel and can pull 14.2 on the big 17 inch wheels I have. The other is my daily driver 1.5 liter SOHC. Its slow but still fun to drive. The B16A though can rip thru the 1/4 miles nicely though. The Sup is about a bit faster but not by much.
SBFHawk1 1 year ago
@akabane1984 Your way off on everything even your expression of your hatred for them in vile ways. God built my CRX to crush your BMW!
My freind at work is on his third E30 since once they reach a certain age mechanically its downhill from there and he cant afford the maintance on them all that while my CRX keeps going on and going and going.
SBFHawk1 1 year ago
1:LOL! Your CRX BETTER keep going! Those B engines are practically immortal even if you thrash them. I hate Hondas but I gotta state the facts. Those engines can RUN.
2:I don't know too much about E30s except that they can be costly but reliable if they are taken care of.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@akabane1984 your dumb, fast and the furious never had a honda so get you shit right.
jbrunner122 1 year ago
Sure it didn't. Which is why those black coupes with the green under neons & big wings weren't Honda Civic EG coupes.
akabane1984 1 year ago
@jbrunner122 hey asshole before you go around calling people dumb get your facts straight because the fast and the furious had honda civics which were at the beginning of the movie driving under the big rigs and shit and there was another race with the jetta against an s2000.
rome8790 1 year ago
beautiful m3<)
saykhan2004 2 years ago
sigh ANOTHER retarded video claiming a honda to beat an ///M3, yet its not even an ///M
Malcome14 2 years ago
take off all that heavy shit on the crxx keep it lokin stock , strip the interior. boost it and you got yourself a non-ricer.
cde48484eee49282f602 2 years ago
wy are they faggots only because they can afford a better car hahaha ricer
elchavo655 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bmw drivers are faggots!!!
kalvtec 2 years ago
my oncle have a 328is... and i still own a crx... i just think your jealous man!
kenv13 2 years ago 8
ok we are faggot cause we have a car that you cant afford cause you work at a fucking mcdonal all ur life??
icemen40 2 years ago
learn to spell... i think its you that stocks shelves lol
d0g0k 2 years ago
i have an e36 3251 cabriolet now but i previously had a crx and i can tell you that the crx is a great little car to drive
eamonosu 2 years ago
BMW rules the streets, for all of you who own hondas "Honda is toy piece of shit car:, i have a 92 325is stock and i smoked a 1998 honda civic with a JDM upgrade including short ram intake and a supercharger, with DC headers. we raced in Long Beach . MPOWER RULES the World
najijordan 2 years ago
you're a fucking faggot dude.
Nesbrurules 2 years ago
you are very funy gay:) ..every way you go people probably are smiling:))
MadziaForever 2 years ago
Comment removed
VWGolfz 2 years ago 3
haha
AUTOSFREAK 2 years ago
E36 316i has 1.596ccm! It is a 1,6L engine
tortebrumm 2 years ago
BMW always owns honda
lameristotel 2 years ago
aha
I have E36 320i 2.0.litre 150HP 2000ccm
23tomi23 2 years ago
Most BMW owners or fans I know are total douchebags. They think they are better than everybody else on the road. I like BMW because of the engine & comfort not the status symbol. I like Honda cause they make the best I4 N/A engines in the planet. I own a 09 135I and 05 S2000. Don't disrespect, appreciate.
HondaS2G 2 years ago 11
atleast their not as bad as mustang owners
1pwNz0mb13Z 2 years ago 3
dammnnnn a 1 series??
you like it?
Saucy0069 2 years ago
listen here i have a 88 bmw 325is of course it will smoke a chunky piece of shit honda,listen my bmw is the M POWERyou got a problem kiss my ass !!!
want to look for me go to st.maarten
slimernizer101 2 years ago
funny boy :)
yondro 2 years ago
"I like Honda cause they make the best I4 N/A engines in the planet." - Not really.
Subaru EJ22>B20.
Nissan SR20>B20.
Honda is an alright car but don't overrate them.
akabane1984 2 years ago
"Subaru EJ22>B20.
Nissan SR20>B20."
Nice try but you're comparing one of Honda's weaker engines that comes from a CRV which is non VTEC but still comparable or better than the engines you mentioned above.
B20 (146bhp/133tq)
EJ22 (142bhp/149tq) Not that impressive considering it has 200cc's more than the B20. Larger displacement helps the torque though.
SR20(140bhp/~130tq) Comparable but B20 still has slightly more peek hp similar torque.
I wont even mention B16/B18 Type R, K20, H22, F20/22C
HondaS2G 2 years ago
It isn't about the the level of power, it's how EARLY the power comes on. That's what determines acceleration. Here's an N/A for you.
EJ20-190 bhp @ 6000rpm:190lb·ft@3800rpm.
Bring up the Type R. It funny how you think that hp is everything when Honda fans have to resort to swapping in & combining the B20 bottom end with other B heads for more torque. The reason why nobody likes Honda motors is because of their severe lack of torque, even @ high rpm.
akabane1984 2 years ago
There's no way an EJ20 N/A (JDM spec or not) will make 190 lb/ft of torque even with variable valve timing. Even it's big brother EJ25 with larger displacement only tops around 170 lb/ft. Unless somehow it's diesel, boosted, or stroked. Don't confuse between torque and n/m (newton meters) numbers. 190 n/m = 140 lb/ft of torque. Subaru's should stick with turbo.
HondaS2G 2 years ago
The JDM N/A EJ20 makes 190hp-190lb-ft. You don't know what you're talking about. Look it up for your self. I know the difference between newton metres & torque. I'm not an idiot. Like I said before, it's not about how much power is being made but how early it comes on. No Honda engine can compete with Subaru in terms of power delivery. In other words, you don't need to rev an EJ to get power out of it. You need to rev a B or a K motor for any kind of response. That's why EJ>K or B motor.
akabane1984 2 years ago
An N/A EJ will have it's torque available @ a much lower rpm than a B or K motor ever will.
Btw EJ254 N/A: 175hp-195lb-ft. Hondas don't even come CLOSE to the power delivery or efficiency to an EJ N/A. Horsepower isn't everything. Torque is what gets you off the line & around a track.
Well I don't know what you're watching then because about 90% of the videos on here shows Subaru crushing Honda with merciless force.
Even boosted Hondas can't compete with boosted Subarus! LOL!
akabane1984 2 years ago
It's funny how you keep changing your Subaru engines every time I make a comment on it cause you can't make up your mind. Last time I check Impreza RS 2.5 with your EJ254 only does 170 lb-ft. of torque. Funny how you say how boosted Subarus beat boosted Hondas which is the other way around. Search for "TOPSETUP EG6 vs XS WRX". This shows a fully modded WRX with racing slicks can't even shake off a front wheel drive Civic K20A N/A from a touge which is pathetic.
HondaS2G 2 years ago
First off, I was talking about EJ motors in general so don't try to correct me.
Secondly, the USDM RS 2.5 has all of the emissions crap that notoriously drops power. Put a free flowing exhaust & intake & you will instantly see the number I have presented.
Third, You've got it ALL wrong. Most boosted Subaru OWN boosted Hondas & it's all over YouTube. Don't get me wrong, Honda is a great car but it's GREATLY overrated.
Fourth, no Honda motor can match a Subaru motor in efficiency & power delivery.
akabane1984 2 years ago
1)I won't correct you if you don't overate your torque #'s
2)I don't even think Japan uses EJ25 yet. It's made specifically for the US market. Japan still use EJ20 and make similar power. No intake or exhaust will boost hp & tq #'s especially on I4 and H4 N/A engines.
3)Honda's are not overrated but underestimated cause they make cheap reliable cars. I type in K20 vs STI, S2K vs STI, Civic VS STI, etc. 9/10 videos I see Hondas winning but u won't care anyway so why bother?
4)That's ur opinion
HondaS2G 2 years ago
1)My #s are correct & taken straight from Subaru ;)
2)I never said they did. Please keep up with the conversation. However, an intake & exhaust WILL boost power & torque to a small degree.
3)Honda are hated because they are seen as fast when they're really not. (Lack of torque, if you didn't get it the 1st time), BTW, You're lying out your ass. Most of the videos show Subaru tearing a new one in Honda & you know it.
4)That's FACT. No Honda motor matches a Subaru. Only a retard would think that.
akabane1984 2 years ago
By the way, can't use one win to justify losing that many times against Subaru. That's like saying "you might beat me 9 out of 10 times but I beat you once so I win!" That doesn't make any sense. It's pretty much stained all over YouTube of Subaru stomping Honda's ass in. You may get a few potent NSXs & S2Ks but more often than not, Subaru ftw.
akabane1984 2 years ago
You're smoking CRACK if you think ANY Honda motor is better than an SR or an EJ. These motors make sufficient torque @ low rpm & they were placed in lightweight bodies similar to Honda. Type in Subaru v.s. Honda on YouTube & see Honda get crushed by it's superior. Trust me, Honda motors don't even come CLOSE to the build quality or response that Subaru motors are built with.
akabane1984 2 years ago
Trust me I like Nissan SR20 and Subarus EJ20 but they require turbo to be fast. All those Subaru VS Honda video's I've seen them all. Overtakes and overtaken. But it takes a boosted Subaru to compete an N/A Honda.
HondaS2G 2 years ago
BMW M3 E36
///M Power!!!!!
23tomi23 2 years ago 3
hahaha this is not a M3!!
its a normaly 3 series with M-paket
X0n3 2 years ago
yeah ofcourse becuse you were there and talked to the BMW owner like i did right ?? if not please shut up.
Ejan81 2 years ago
catchup and smoked it ..crx=crappey rice box... get a clue and a real car .. forreal it even has dual exhaust tips thats some serious rice buisness...
donutthrowinbdass 2 years ago
it does not have dual exhaust tip..are you high or something ??
Ejan81 2 years ago
BMW=
Baverian
Manure
Wagon
=]
90crxd16 2 years ago
All those names for cars are so stupid.
But then you get this one and it's halarious.
Pontiac...
Poor
Old
Nigger
Thinking
It's
A
Cadillac
jeepman655 2 years ago
they are more expensive - for better quality... that and the stupid name they pay for...
Though Honda has come a long way - I'm enjoying all there new models even the Honda si looks freaking cool.
mustangwner2003V6 3 years ago
that's an M? i dont think so .
slutimano 3 years ago 4
why does everybody cry about the honda or the bmw just look at the race and enjot it
sonybravialcd 3 years ago
And at the end of the day, which one would you rather see yourself driving in... Bmw of course. lol
mustangwner2003V6 3 years ago
Not me...if i wanted a BMW i would buy one but no thanks.
Ejan81 3 years ago
But the BMW is an E36, outdated and cheap now......not a status symbol anymore.
Neither is the CRX though
tubegangsta 3 years ago
no one was talking about status....
It is a given, you have more quality in any BMW. you could never compare any Honda to a BMW...
as for this video at the end of the day..
The BMW is going to be a better smoother ride and comfy seats....
fuck status... no one has status unless you're driving the most expensive car in the world... otherwise you're just like the next man down.... no status accept wanna B's...
mustangwner2003V6 3 years ago 4
BMWs are status symbols, you can't deny that.
Along with that comes high quality, etc. which gives it a good reputation.
As for the BMW being a better quality car, it depends. My Honda is probably more luxurious than the BMW in the video, as it is a '08 model whereas the BMW in the video is like 1995 w/ ricer headlights and taillights.
Oh, and if you want comfy seats, you should've gotten a Mercedes Benz, not a BMW.
tubegangsta 3 years ago 3
a car does not make status.....
however - BMW does have Quality.
as for Mercedes, I enjoy there sport models. loll but that is just me.
as for the video - those years - you can't compare a Honda to a BMW...
Sure if you look at a newer model Honda verse an older BMW.. that's just common sense... BC- it is newer*** now compare an 08 Honda to an 08 BMW..
mustangwner2003V6 3 years ago
B.M.W = BayrischeMotorenWerke
lol
not much power
o02oo90o 3 years ago
nice which one won??
darthyoda93 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
crx suck hard cock...
bbigluck 3 years ago
honda crx v-tech's are as fast as an 328i 0-100 km/h
after that the bmw wins,(more power then the stupid crx)
zici 3 years ago
B.M.W = much power
AdryanMutu 3 years ago
hey guys the m3 was 3.0 286hp until 96 and the motor was single vanos and from 96 bmw posted the new motor which was 3.2 321hp and this motor was double vanos
marwanmekkawey 3 years ago
euro m3 3.2 has got 321hp
acsznycel 3 years ago 2
crx own youuuuuuuu bmw b i t c h
vollgas83 3 years ago
yo the crx doesnt own SHIT! cept maybe a rice patty field somewhere in japland! HAHAHAHA!
BMW3ICS 3 years ago
I dont know what video you were watching, but on this page the crx clearly doesnt win.
DasFresh 3 years ago
it saddens me that the e36 has the same tail lights as the honda =[
streetfury1028 3 years ago
Problem with the CRX is 1st gear is short and sloppy... 2nd gear and BANG it goes like SOAS!!
SammyJ21 3 years ago
the crx sound a bit off from the clutch...it would kick the beemers ass anytime...
superfestiva 3 years ago 3
yeah right...
the M3 'only' has 285hp (3.0 version) or 320hp (3.2 version)
CRX has only 130hp and is only fast the first couple of meters, cuz it weights as much as a ream of rice paper, above 100kmh it's nothing...
bennie1980 3 years ago
Try 240hp... not 285 lol
drebert2627 3 years ago 2
euro M3's do have 286... Not sure where this vid was takin tho...
Spahrticus777 3 years ago
CRX with vtec ~ 150hp(in EU)and ~ 950-1000kg
xHUNxDraco3D 3 years ago
this is no VTEC CRX...it´s a ED9 with 124hp as standard ..this one is modded to about 145hp and weight in at 920kg
Ejan81 3 years ago
Honda Rules¡¡ xD
CuCoNE1