these new names i don't like them. now its no longer World Wrestling Entertainment inc. its just WWE inc. i wish we could have the cool names and no orphan initials.
These new PPV names SUCK . I cannot believe how lazy the WWE's creative team has become, the PPV's can't even get unique names half of them are just names of matches .. & then the other ones just have really stupid names , Bragging Rights, Over The Limit ... fuck those are the only two with names that aren't matches ! -______-
now its not even World Wrestling Entertainment inc. its just WWE inc. which means nothing now. i hope we will look back on when the next name change comes and say damn WWE was better then World Wrestling Entertainment after 2004 or maybe we will say that wrestling still never got a return to the glory it once was maybe a new era not the attitude era because right now without edge WWE has no chance of making that good
I think WWE has lost itself and TNA is picking up on the things that WWE is doing away with - WE need WWE to be a higher rating than PG as it has lost its realism.
Bring back the Attitude Era or say goodbye to millions of fans who are now faced with a poor predictable tv show aimed at kids it seems!
I see why they've shifted around and renamed PPV events. Apart from Royal Rumble, WrestleMania, SummerSlam and Survivor Series, all other events are now more specific with what they involve. But I still think they should've kept No Way Out, Backlash, Judgment Day, Unforgiven, No Mercy and Armageddon. They should bring back old events like the King of the Ring and Fully Loaded.
If WWE's gonna bring in any pay per views to replace the ones they're getting rid of, it should be King of the Ring. I would love to see a KOTR tourney with all the new superstars WWE got over the last 5-10 yrs.
One thing that i think might be quite good about the MITB ppv is the thought we could see big names in the match-ups maybe HHH, Orton that is only one thing that i think good. I swear WildCard got scrapped.
interesting thoughts dude but please stop moving ur head so much.. i tend to look at people's eyes when they speak and u were moving so much it made me dizzy.. stop headbanging..
Are you fucking kidding me Survivor Series is the where all the legends made History. Fucking WWE. Stupidest shit they do they humiliated ECW and they might change money in the bank ill be pissed if they do that makes 8 superstars not have a ticket to wrestlemania fucking Vince man
Money in the bank isn't gone from Wm, but a stupid ppv about the match would be dumb. They should scrap the MITB ppv and replace it with breaking point. I think it's stupid that they already got rid of BReaking point, i actually liked it!
raw and impact are two very very different shows, wwe are more family entertainment where as i PERSONALLY believe that tna is a more entertaining show because they use more interesting moves and arent so repetitive and predictable.
i agree that TNA are focusing way too much on the storyline aspects at the moment, maybe because of the return of the "monday night wars" but the wrestling i do see on TNA is extremely innovative, i suppose its all down to personal preference, mine is TNA :P
and that's stupid, because what WWE is basically saying is either they are going to have two MITB matches every year or this is the start of the end of MITB at Wrestlemania. Either way, it cheapens the concept big time.
So tell me Edgehead0075, what's your justification for why Raw sucks so bad. They are the "B" show --and I'm being generous here -- compared to Smackdown. And that was never the case throughout WWE's history.
@Edgehead10075-You're not convincing anyone that you've been watching for 18 years. You keep talking about recent shit. No DQ in a cage match? Wow. I'll see you that and raise you the lil people's court from WWE. Stop acting like everything WWE does is right. You're dillusional if you think that.
The little people's court is still better than a DQ in a cage match. At least the court developed an ongoing storyline. There's really nothing positive about a cage match ending in a DQ. WWE doesn't do everything right, but I think that it does the "big" stuff right.
THANK GODD!!!!! EVERYONE READ THIS WrestleMania XXVI WILL have MITB!!!!! because tonight, RAW will have Qualifying Matches! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As I said before people are making the assumption that TNA is turning into WCW. Remember when WCW changed all of their PPV names prior to being bought out; those great names like "Sin" and "Superbrawl Revenge" and how about my personal favorite, "Greed."
and since now that ya comment brought me here ..how manyy fuckin comments you gunna leave with useless shit everyone knows tna going in the toilet besides morons on tna dick with ovverated"this is awesome chants"..TNA AINT COMPETITION,,its a laugh n a half of a fucking joke..flai n hogan wrestling in a tag flair wit aj n abyss wit hogan and the plan to make hogan heel n they want abyss to be the face of tna HA HA.yea that will sell out arenas worldwide (FART)
well then you better hope TNA becomes competition and doesn't go down, because with zero competition, WWE will keep putting on the same shit. WWE seriously needs a wake-up call and so I hope TNA succeeds. I want wrestling again. As much as I enjoy watching old shit from the Attitude era and my favorite year 2001, I want to be entertained like that again instead of reminiscing about the "good ol days."
well mitb does take lots of tv time to built up with the qualifying matches and now that ecw is gone building it up could potential look weak and with all the mitb having to steal the show earily on the show could affect the rest of the card to look stale and boring.
i would hope they keep MITB at wrestlemania. It adds to the spectacle. And yes i agree with the stupid ppv names. No Way Out and Backlash were great because they made sense. No Way Out being the nature of the Elimination Chamber. And Backlash being revenge and unfinished business from Wrestlemania.
Well, WrestleMania looks to be all set. It seems that the top four matches will be: Cena vs. Batista for the WWE Title, Edge vs. Jericho for the World Heavyweight Title, HBK vs. UT in a rematch from last year, and Vince McMahon vs. Bret Hart in a match over twelve years in the making. That sounds pretty solid to me.
MITB on the undercard of WM made WM so unpredictable, it gave us a sense that the champion may lose the belt that night. If it truly is 100% gone then vinnie mac is just trying to kill the concept. MITB should never be headlining a ppv, it needs to be overshadowed by better matches. The MITB made Edge and Punk, I had high hopes for miz or morrison this year but if it is cancelled then thats just sad. I'm guessing a guest host ppv, maybe a music concert ppv in the future.
I feel as if these changes the WWE make towards their ppv are going to blow up in their face. Take Hell in the Cell ppv. Not really a good ppv and because of the fans may not be interested for the next year. If they dont put any true feelings in the build and execution of the ppv then the E's ppv buys are going to the same if not worse. I hope I am wrong about this.
i hate this mitb has lost its flavor who knows they might have 3 mitb matches wild card is gay fatal four way bland r.i.p survior series one day vince u will learn its Hell trying to get to Heaven
Lmao...seems like WWE would do those but I got one......"WWE Inferno Match"....watch and see if WWE doesn't end up doing an inferno match headlining PPV.
I think backlash should have stayed as i love the name and ppv look, but I dont give care about the name changes. All I care about is that the new names fucking suck dick.
Personaly I would like to rename them all but to impassive names like unbreakable, bound for glory, slammiversary, wrestlemania etc no dark brooding names like, unforgiven, no mercy, judgement day, armageddon, hard justice etc dont like any of them
i see bragging rights being SS really, war games if it does come back will surely be used as it's own entity, but strangely that also could be put on a SS show.
A very silly move by Vinnie Mac, I don't watch WM just for MITB but when it gives you 4* matches most of the time you need it to boost perhaps a below par WrestleMania or make a great one excellent.
dont forget about vengence they threw that away and put night of champions on vengence built up great storylines but no they threw it away and but night of champs now dont get me wrong night of champs ppvs had really good matches but i do miss vengence thoguh
back in, say the attitude era. you would actually have your top guys in main events in non title matches. because, thats not what it was about. if you hate someone, u wanna kick there ass thats it. isnt it funny that all the top guys just happen to hate the guy who has the belt. then they try to throw some personal crap in there to actually make u believe they hate each other
seriously alls this says, and every other ppv name change is doing is making it to were they dont have to write anything because it will be headlined by a gimmick match. we're getting more and more away from the actual wrestling product. look at the cards there's usually like one actual rivalry. and the rest are either gimmick matches, or someone chasing a belt. like SERIOUSLY? u cant write a rivalry with a storyline thats not solely based around the belt?
OKAY. to everybody whose pissed off that mitb will not be at wrestlemania, and say that that is the only reason they watch wrestlemania. how about watching developed storylines and rivalries with talented mid card guys. not a stupid gimmick filler(despite the one person who actually gets a push from it)
it has been confirmed on PW Insider that Royal Rumble has been renamed to Lumberjack Mania. And SummerSlam has been renamed to Two out of Three Falls.
this makes me sick..when i first started watching wwe i loved it..i thought it was the best thing in the world..i loved the year 2007 in wrestling..i couldnt wait until wrestlemania 24..i watched the money in the bank match and loved it..but this match belongs at wrestlemania..i guess there is a good and bad side..the good is that the creative team is only trying to get more viewers..the bad side is..after reading these comments they will lose viewers too..but i like love wwe:/
It sucks if MITB would not be in WM. The main reason that I watch WM is because of that match and because I'm sure that I won't watch in that match guys like HHH, Cena, Batista, Taker, Orton, etc, guys that they are main eventers and already had their chance at the world titles.
In 2011 when WWE goes G... There are new names for the PPVs.... January: WWE Have Fun February: WWE Elimination Spelling Contest March: WWE Wrestling Is Cool April: WWE Barney the Dinosuar May: WWE Pronouns and Adjectives June: WWE Night of Winners July: WWE America Rules August: WWE SummerFest September: WWE Back-To-School October: WWE Halloween November: WWE Knowledge is Power December: WWE Christmas Break
I agree why not just bring back KOTR, these ppv names suck I mean wwe money in the bank. Whats next wwe cage match or wwe street fight what ever happen to non gimmick ppvs
It's nice to see wwe finally acknowledge that business sucks and they have to improve the product, but i can't help but feel like some of these moves are ridiculous. they want their ppvs to have an identity, so.. they get rid of Survivor Series, the most popular gimmick ppv franchise in wrestling history. Perhaps next they'll completely squander the opportunity to capitalize on the success of the major wcw ppv franchises that they purchased the right to use (oh wait, they already did that).
this goes 2 show how much wwe cares about the fans that've been with them for years, i mean MY GOD, FATAL 4 WAY!!!!!!!!WTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! in my opinion their returning bac 2 the gimmick days of th 80's. i hope ur wrong about mitb @Mania to Tslayer
Personally, the WWE should make the King of the Ring tournament a PPV and use the stipulation that was used in 2002 when Brock Lesner won it: The winner of the KOTR would get a title shot at Summerslam. This would not only revitalize the KOTR concept, but would make Summerslam more interesting.
MITB was one if not the best match on the Wrestlemania card it gave mid carders a main slot on the biggest PPV and had great entertainment value this just sucks.
God damn it, I am tired of this shit from WWE. After the last ep of ECW pissed me off so bad that I doubted I would watch WWE again, THIS shit is the final straw.
Actually, that's not what I said. If you'll read my initial comment (though i wouldn't be surprised if you forgot, because you seem to be doing a lot of argument-starting, putting down the opinions of others, and preaching WWE) you will see I said I was pissed off by the last episode of ECW. This is because they paid almost no respect to Paul Heyman or any of the other people who built ECW. So in conclusion I was not just pissed about the PPV changes, which were more expansive than just names.
Okay, so you will stop watching WWE simply because they disrespected the original ECW and are changing the names of the PPV? That still seems a bit flimsy.
@Edgehead10075 Well, to me the changes are more than just the names, and also I am very passionate about the original ECW, so basically, yeah. But this is just the straw that broke the camel's back so to speak, as I've been wary of watching WWE (RAW at the very least) for a while
the money in the bank in july will probably be a "royal rumble" to summerslam since they want summerslam to be like a wrestlemania in the summer. the winner of that match will get a title shot at summerslam while the winner of the wrestlemania mitb will get a title shot at any time over the course of a year.
if MITB will bcme its own ppv, then what will happen to the MITB winners? its a basic waste off time. fatal 4 is the dummest ppv match gimmick evr. xwwelegendhdxv1 has a video about matt and jeff tlkin bout nxt. and jeff said its a chance that he might show up there
I think that a "wait and see" approach is needed when dealing with all of wrestling in the U.S. right now. I have no problem with PPVs having a theme as long as it's done in a logical manner. That said, most people feel that the WWE fails to do this. WWE and the fans have to remember that what's happening now needs to lead to something bigger and/or better for later. Maybe taking MITB out of Wrestlemania is bad, but we won't know for sure until later.
Vince has gone insane, i will stop watching after wrestlemania and go to TNA.
The fact that backlash offers a good PPV normally and replacing it with retarded etreme rules makes me sick. I guarentee this will hitt hem right back in the face. The other PPV changes are retarded too. WWE is pathetic.
Well WWE the way it's going will suck more than TNA. I don't particularly like either, but if i had to choose one TNA would interest me more if it wasnt for wrestlemania around the corner.
All of this does make me wonder who is coming up with these ideas in the WWE. Whoever it is they are doing a good job of trying to be like Vince Russo...
I think the fact that is is one of the better matches IS why it's possibly on it's way out. If it featured HHH and/or HBK it would be a different story, but instead outshines the top tier guys matches. It's beyond a travesty that Benjamin has never won anyway, as he steals the show.
If WWE is going head to head with TNA on Monday Nights they must do away with PG, and Money in the Bank is always the best match on Wrestlemania so I won't order WM if MITB isn't there!
the way i see it, it doesn't matter if wwe just wants to experiment, nor does it matter if they had one of their big four up against a ufc event on a november weekend, they shouldn't do away with survivor series. that may not be the most intriguing of the four -- not as intriguing as it once was, but there's a lot of history thats been made at survivor series. i think replacing it basically says "forget everything u thought happened, it never happened."
i didnt literally mean 10 minutes, but the last couple of matches have been pretty short, i think thats what hurt the match at wrestlemania 25, great, just needed more time. the wwe decided to give more time to a kid rock performance than 2 matches from the match card combined, i just think that if they put this on a ppv where its centered around the mitb match itself, we might see a longer match where they will get the oppurtunity to have an amazing match, but i might be wrong
MIIB will deffiatly be a tournement, but havnt wwe learned anything from tna or eventhem sleves King of the ring sucked, no one liked it, against all odds sucked, and how havnt they learned that tournement ppvs dont work in teh US in japan they work very well, but not wwe or tna.
@Mizfit51 well in buy rates it could of been but teh matches were shit, and kotr 2002 sucked, brock lesner won it and during this time period he was a low carder, and wanst ready for teh main event, if vince was smart he would of let van dam win.
@ADYG9 It sucked? Excuse me? RVD/Lesnar was a great match, I have no clue what you're on about.
And duh, WWE pushed Lesnar fast, because he was going to be huge, and correct me if I'm wrong.. But he was one of the most over guys in the WWE within 6 months of that point.
He was talented, he had draw, he looked the part, he's huge. You could market him as the top-tier monster that was fresh and WWE was lacking at the time.
KOTR was for making new stars, and that's exactly what it did.
Yeah, I get that. There were some total booking fails in KOTR itself as well... Billy Gunn? Really? Billy Bitchcakes won?
But regardless, I like how they did it in 2008 (not the people in it, but the concept). Having a tournament on RAW, though I would have stretched it out over a few weeks, then put the finals on a PPV card for a solid filler.
It's not so much that tournaments in WWE don't work, it's that booking has yet to find a way to MAKE them work.
Another bad thing about all these gimmick PPV is that they take away from the story. Afew gimmick PPV is ok, but when ALL PPV have gimmicks, it takes away from the story. Like say two guys are feuding and the way the story is told would make sense for the feud to end with a Ladder Match. Well now they can't, or if they do, they have to wait until TLC comes around. So I agree, most of these PPV changes are WWEs sadly obvious attempt to draw in more viewers.
"..Tna has way too many gimmicks..." lol, that's what people used to say. I'm glad i haven't seen anybody on here defending wwe..
If MITB is not on the WM card, what will guys like Kofi and Morrison do? I mean year after year we are reminded of how talented Shelton Benjamin is and now they will be relegated to saying hello in a backstage segment or in some stupid battle royal....I can just see it now, next MITB will have HHH, Cena, Orton Sheamus.......boy o boy, that sounds fun!
I think PG Extreme Rules an work, it just is really hard to do. I mean, remember Undertaker vs Edge for the World Title at Extreme a few years back. That was a good match, was extreme, and by how hard they could've gone was fairly PG. So I must disagree that Extreme Rules can't work, but I do believe having it after WrestleMania is BAD placement of the PPV
Yeah also last year's Extreme Rules was pretty good to. So I ain't all that upset either. Just Backlash and Armageddon were the more popular out of the monthly shows.
As for MITB, I heard they were doing qualifiers next week, but we'll see.
If its gone from Mania, I'm not going to weep. Its fun, but not a necessity. They did 20 shows without it, & I would rather the Ladder match be used for big grudge & title matches like it was at X, 2000, & X-Seven. MITB even kind of took away from the Hardy match last year because everything they did seemed to pale in comparison to that car wreck that was MITB. Also, how many times can you have a guy steal a title?
Honestly, I enjoyed most Manias prior to MITB's conclusion. Its all opinion, but the only ones I can honestly say I didn't like were 11, 13, 15, & 16 and even those had some saving graces (except 11...that was just awful) .
I feel like MITB is kind of the same thing every year. Its never bad, but after a while they start to run together. If they keep it. Cool. If they don't keep it, fine as long as you come up with a cool way to fill the spot. I just dont feel its a must have is all.
Truthslayer i dont see why everytime WWE changes PPVs people feel they have to bitch and complain about it these PPVs that the WWE are changing could be good PPVs you never know.
mitb is the only thing dat made wm 24 good an it sux dat there taking it away da yr. b4 wm 27 when it comes to atl and i will b there but it sux mitb isn't gonna b there
are they trying to copy UFC with the names of the Main events, but instead of names of the partisipants, they do the matches, Elimination Chamber, Hell In a Cell, Exstream Rules.
If people are ordering WM just for MITB thats an indicator that they really need to work on a lot of other areas because to me MITB should be one of the least factorrs you order that PPV. You SHOULD order the PPV for the main event and if you arent then WWE is not doing their job. The problem isn't the names its that they're replacing these slots with ALL gimmick PPVs. Doing a whole year of gimmick PPVs is just silly.
I think some people are making too big a deal about this. So the WWE is trying out some new PPVs. What's so wrong with that? May I remind some of you that when they put out new PPVs last year, all of them but one (Breaking Point) got decent buyrates. Not to mention that Bragging Rights and TLC were actually good shows. I say let's give them a chance and see what will be on the shows before you start your complaining.
I think people are looking at the Money in the Bank idea the wrong way. I think the Money in the Bank match will still be at WM, but the WWE just scrapped the whole cash it in whenever idea and give him the title shot at his own PPV against whichever champion he wants, (basically he's the Spring Royal Rumble Winner)
WWE must have realized that guys just cashing in MitB results in no build up of a guy and gets no pay off becuase it could happen anywhere. Just my take though, I could be wrong
damn, that's actually a pretty good idea, never really thought about that. although, it does take that unpredictable element away from the mitb winner being able to cash in whenever he wants, that is still an interesting concept.
This has been flagged as spam show
hey sweet video! you should check this video out /watch?v=9mokamd5k5g
HarlandLeanz 9 months ago
legit way to make extra cash online /watch?v=BMPhsRN19Ms
JewelLigon 9 months ago
these new names i don't like them. now its no longer World Wrestling Entertainment inc. its just WWE inc. i wish we could have the cool names and no orphan initials.
TheICWLeague 10 months ago
from what i understand,they plan on having MITB at both Wrestlemania AND as its own seperate PPV going forward
chrisbrown456 1 year ago
get the old ones back! lol
786hasnan 1 year ago
These new PPV names SUCK . I cannot believe how lazy the WWE's creative team has become, the PPV's can't even get unique names half of them are just names of matches .. & then the other ones just have really stupid names , Bragging Rights, Over The Limit ... fuck those are the only two with names that aren't matches ! -______-
iFranxo 1 year ago
thats the sickest intro ever.
appletickle 1 year ago
if they goin 2 make a ppv about matches they should bring back king of the ring also they should make a pay per view day of reckoning
aalfredo101 1 year ago
World Wrestling FEDERATION is better than World Wrestling ENTERTAINMENT.
Where's the blood?
Where's the realism?
Where's the Bra & Panties match?!
STUPID PG
descenderofterresia 1 year ago 3
@descenderofterresia
now its not even World Wrestling Entertainment inc. its just WWE inc. which means nothing now. i hope we will look back on when the next name change comes and say damn WWE was better then World Wrestling Entertainment after 2004 or maybe we will say that wrestling still never got a return to the glory it once was maybe a new era not the attitude era because right now without edge WWE has no chance of making that good
TheICWLeague 10 months ago
I think WWE has lost itself and TNA is picking up on the things that WWE is doing away with - WE need WWE to be a higher rating than PG as it has lost its realism.
Bring back the Attitude Era or say goodbye to millions of fans who are now faced with a poor predictable tv show aimed at kids it seems!
dmm250678 1 year ago
I don't think moving the money in the bank match from wrestlemania to a ppv is a good idea
because it became a trademark of wm and the fact that the MITB match from wm26
is the last one to be held there just sucks
Damn3691 1 year ago
money in the bank is one of many reasons why i watch WM...
lopas961 1 year ago
I see why they've shifted around and renamed PPV events. Apart from Royal Rumble, WrestleMania, SummerSlam and Survivor Series, all other events are now more specific with what they involve. But I still think they should've kept No Way Out, Backlash, Judgment Day, Unforgiven, No Mercy and Armageddon. They should bring back old events like the King of the Ring and Fully Loaded.
ryhorn100 1 year ago
the mitb that was at wm26 was the final 1 to b held at a wrestlemania due to the ppv appening
cole003f 1 year ago
If WWE's gonna bring in any pay per views to replace the ones they're getting rid of, it should be King of the Ring. I would love to see a KOTR tourney with all the new superstars WWE got over the last 5-10 yrs.
itsbankaibitch 1 year ago
@itsbankaibitch OK im wiv u on dat
and they should also bring back Armageddon
jeffhardyfan521 1 year ago
One thing that i think might be quite good about the MITB ppv is the thought we could see big names in the match-ups maybe HHH, Orton that is only one thing that i think good. I swear WildCard got scrapped.
mattmeyou 1 year ago
interesting thoughts dude but please stop moving ur head so much.. i tend to look at people's eyes when they speak and u were moving so much it made me dizzy.. stop headbanging..
xyko 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you fucking kidding me Survivor Series is the where all the legends made History. Fucking WWE. Stupidest shit they do they humiliated ECW and they might change money in the bank ill be pissed if they do that makes 8 superstars not have a ticket to wrestlemania fucking Vince man
wtfuxdavid 1 year ago
The past two years in the WWE have been very harsh on Pay-Per-View tradition.
Last year we had Unforgiven and No Mercy replaced by Breaking Point and Hell in a Cell.
Armageddon shifted for TLC: Tables Ladders and Chairs.
This year has been no different, with No Way Out already being replaced with Elimination Chamber. And there's a lot more changes as you've said.
Money in the Bank gratefully will still be at Mania this year. And I'll say I do and don't like the match-type PPVs.
wweell635 1 year ago
Money in the bank isn't gone from Wm, but a stupid ppv about the match would be dumb. They should scrap the MITB ppv and replace it with breaking point. I think it's stupid that they already got rid of BReaking point, i actually liked it!
0653177 2 years ago
raw and impact are two very very different shows, wwe are more family entertainment where as i PERSONALLY believe that tna is a more entertaining show because they use more interesting moves and arent so repetitive and predictable.
davidgiggs1 2 years ago
Impact had 13 minutes of wrestling on 2/25.
Edgehead10075 1 year ago
i agree that TNA are focusing way too much on the storyline aspects at the moment, maybe because of the return of the "monday night wars" but the wrestling i do see on TNA is extremely innovative, i suppose its all down to personal preference, mine is TNA :P
davidgiggs1 1 year ago
no money in the bank is not gone bcause christian is the first man in it at WMXXVI
jdkneelo 2 years ago
and that's stupid, because what WWE is basically saying is either they are going to have two MITB matches every year or this is the start of the end of MITB at Wrestlemania. Either way, it cheapens the concept big time.
missingwweofold 2 years ago
So tell me Edgehead0075, what's your justification for why Raw sucks so bad. They are the "B" show --and I'm being generous here -- compared to Smackdown. And that was never the case throughout WWE's history.
missingwweofold 2 years ago
Raw is still considered to be the "A" show, and the ratings prove it. I don't mind Raw at all.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
@Edgehead10075-You're not convincing anyone that you've been watching for 18 years. You keep talking about recent shit. No DQ in a cage match? Wow. I'll see you that and raise you the lil people's court from WWE. Stop acting like everything WWE does is right. You're dillusional if you think that.
missingwweofold 2 years ago
The little people's court is still better than a DQ in a cage match. At least the court developed an ongoing storyline. There's really nothing positive about a cage match ending in a DQ. WWE doesn't do everything right, but I think that it does the "big" stuff right.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
there is a mitb match this year, ya!!
WrestlemaniaRules 2 years ago
THANK GODD!!!!! EVERYONE READ THIS WrestleMania XXVI WILL have MITB!!!!! because tonight, RAW will have Qualifying Matches! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
X360H911 2 years ago
As I said before people are making the assumption that TNA is turning into WCW. Remember when WCW changed all of their PPV names prior to being bought out; those great names like "Sin" and "Superbrawl Revenge" and how about my personal favorite, "Greed."
missingwweofold 2 years ago
TNA seems a lot like WCW to me.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
and since now that ya comment brought me here ..how manyy fuckin comments you gunna leave with useless shit everyone knows tna going in the toilet besides morons on tna dick with ovverated"this is awesome chants"..TNA AINT COMPETITION,,its a laugh n a half of a fucking joke..flai n hogan wrestling in a tag flair wit aj n abyss wit hogan and the plan to make hogan heel n they want abyss to be the face of tna HA HA.yea that will sell out arenas worldwide (FART)
Leg3ndKilla687 2 years ago
well then you better hope TNA becomes competition and doesn't go down, because with zero competition, WWE will keep putting on the same shit. WWE seriously needs a wake-up call and so I hope TNA succeeds. I want wrestling again. As much as I enjoy watching old shit from the Attitude era and my favorite year 2001, I want to be entertained like that again instead of reminiscing about the "good ol days."
missingwweofold 2 years ago
Okay. Well what do you want to see from WWE?
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
MITB at wrestlemania should be replaced with a scramble match maybe.
Ratmann3684 2 years ago
well mitb does take lots of tv time to built up with the qualifying matches and now that ecw is gone building it up could potential look weak and with all the mitb having to steal the show earily on the show could affect the rest of the card to look stale and boring.
cyberskilldragon 2 years ago
i would hope they keep MITB at wrestlemania. It adds to the spectacle. And yes i agree with the stupid ppv names. No Way Out and Backlash were great because they made sense. No Way Out being the nature of the Elimination Chamber. And Backlash being revenge and unfinished business from Wrestlemania.
youfanscansticki88 2 years ago
Jericho is the epitome of a transitional champion. He's just warming the belt for Edge.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
It will also probably be Orton vs. DiBiase, but I don't know how Cody Rhodes will fit in that match.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
Well, WrestleMania looks to be all set. It seems that the top four matches will be: Cena vs. Batista for the WWE Title, Edge vs. Jericho for the World Heavyweight Title, HBK vs. UT in a rematch from last year, and Vince McMahon vs. Bret Hart in a match over twelve years in the making. That sounds pretty solid to me.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
all these fuckin gimmick based ppv's are TERRIBLE ideas. now i remember why i don't watch the wwe anymore
monster1555 2 years ago
agreed. The novelty of these gimmick ppvs are just going to wear out
sheemobile 2 years ago
i would be really disapionted if MITB ins't at wrestlemania. it would be like not having turkey at thanksgiving
chivasalldaway 2 years ago
Forgot, RVD was also elivated after winning MITB, how could i forget rvd. MITB, IC, WWE and ECW championship all in a couple of months.
slowdude 2 years ago
MITB on the undercard of WM made WM so unpredictable, it gave us a sense that the champion may lose the belt that night. If it truly is 100% gone then vinnie mac is just trying to kill the concept. MITB should never be headlining a ppv, it needs to be overshadowed by better matches. The MITB made Edge and Punk, I had high hopes for miz or morrison this year but if it is cancelled then thats just sad. I'm guessing a guest host ppv, maybe a music concert ppv in the future.
slowdude 2 years ago
I feel as if these changes the WWE make towards their ppv are going to blow up in their face. Take Hell in the Cell ppv. Not really a good ppv and because of the fans may not be interested for the next year. If they dont put any true feelings in the build and execution of the ppv then the E's ppv buys are going to the same if not worse. I hope I am wrong about this.
therealsongoku 2 years ago
@ivanpek009 dont give the WWE ideas
TheeFuzz 2 years ago
no one buy then vince will learn what they are doing
w0600221 2 years ago
i hate this mitb has lost its flavor who knows they might have 3 mitb matches wild card is gay fatal four way bland r.i.p survior series one day vince u will learn its Hell trying to get to Heaven
w0600221 2 years ago
Lmao...seems like WWE would do those but I got one......"WWE Inferno Match"....watch and see if WWE doesn't end up doing an inferno match headlining PPV.
EpicTG 2 years ago
god all u do is complain can u do a video ware ur not fucking complaining for once dude give me a break u are not gonna change anything
choloman72 2 years ago
fuck the wwe
NickGlavin 2 years ago
I think backlash should have stayed as i love the name and ppv look, but I dont give care about the name changes. All I care about is that the new names fucking suck dick.
Personaly I would like to rename them all but to impassive names like unbreakable, bound for glory, slammiversary, wrestlemania etc no dark brooding names like, unforgiven, no mercy, judgement day, armageddon, hard justice etc dont like any of them
Dante1Savage 2 years ago
@Dante1Savage I always did think the logo for backlash kicked ass
ziimmyneutron 1 year ago
I was thinking how about war games at bragging rites raw vs smackdown
Mypugfrank 2 years ago
i see bragging rights being SS really, war games if it does come back will surely be used as it's own entity, but strangely that also could be put on a SS show.
Dante1Savage 2 years ago
A very silly move by Vinnie Mac, I don't watch WM just for MITB but when it gives you 4* matches most of the time you need it to boost perhaps a below par WrestleMania or make a great one excellent.
rtk316ytshooter94 2 years ago
dont forget about vengence they threw that away and put night of champions on vengence built up great storylines but no they threw it away and but night of champs now dont get me wrong night of champs ppvs had really good matches but i do miss vengence thoguh
millineumstankonia 2 years ago
tna is all im going to say
hamburgeler84 2 years ago
TNA sucks.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
you're ugly.
ALTRIX1 2 years ago
back in, say the attitude era. you would actually have your top guys in main events in non title matches. because, thats not what it was about. if you hate someone, u wanna kick there ass thats it. isnt it funny that all the top guys just happen to hate the guy who has the belt. then they try to throw some personal crap in there to actually make u believe they hate each other
gemis8 2 years ago
seriously alls this says, and every other ppv name change is doing is making it to were they dont have to write anything because it will be headlined by a gimmick match. we're getting more and more away from the actual wrestling product. look at the cards there's usually like one actual rivalry. and the rest are either gimmick matches, or someone chasing a belt. like SERIOUSLY? u cant write a rivalry with a storyline thats not solely based around the belt?
gemis8 2 years ago
OKAY. to everybody whose pissed off that mitb will not be at wrestlemania, and say that that is the only reason they watch wrestlemania. how about watching developed storylines and rivalries with talented mid card guys. not a stupid gimmick filler(despite the one person who actually gets a push from it)
gemis8 2 years ago
Comment removed
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
heres a thought tslay. maybe the mitb at mania winner will now cash it in at the mitb ppv.
chriswarden420 2 years ago
the wwe might as well start calling themselves live theater the fucking fairies.
fuck McMahon, he lost his touch. he better start doing some psychedelics and give his brain a reboot.
JOESGONNAKILLY0U 2 years ago
The november PPV will be headlined by a 2 out of 3 falls match called:
WWE 3 Stages of Heaven
irishock 2 years ago
it has been confirmed on PW Insider that Royal Rumble has been renamed to Lumberjack Mania. And SummerSlam has been renamed to Two out of Three Falls.
wwestyles94 2 years ago 2
this makes me sick..when i first started watching wwe i loved it..i thought it was the best thing in the world..i loved the year 2007 in wrestling..i couldnt wait until wrestlemania 24..i watched the money in the bank match and loved it..but this match belongs at wrestlemania..i guess there is a good and bad side..the good is that the creative team is only trying to get more viewers..the bad side is..after reading these comments they will lose viewers too..but i like love wwe:/
itscenatimebaby 2 years ago
It sucks if MITB would not be in WM. The main reason that I watch WM is because of that match and because I'm sure that I won't watch in that match guys like HHH, Cena, Batista, Taker, Orton, etc, guys that they are main eventers and already had their chance at the world titles.
bassmike7021 2 years ago
there in talks of removing the Royal Rumble PPV and the SummerSlam PPV in 2011. the reason for these name changes is buy rate.
kingblingbla 2 years ago
The day they get rid of the Royal Rumble is the day I stop watching WWE. Survivor Series is bad enough...
Kuronji 2 years ago 5
They won't get rid of the Rumble. The Rumble match is still quite relevant.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
Yeah well I never thought they would get rid of Survivor Series but they did, you can never tell what crazy Vince is going to do.
Kuronji 2 years ago
irishock 2 years ago 18
haha i can picture that already
God62698 2 years ago
@irishock LMAO, tho April should be WWE "Abourgeddon" or "WWTree".
October:WWE and the Great Pumpkin
"Knowledge is Power" sounds like a name for a supercard by Ted DiBiase Sr's Power Wrestling Alliance.
December:WWE How the Vince stole XMas-narrated by Lanny Poffo.
steeltownbrown52 2 years ago
good one, lol.
xxshannen1xx 2 years ago
I agree why not just bring back KOTR, these ppv names suck I mean wwe money in the bank. Whats next wwe cage match or wwe street fight what ever happen to non gimmick ppvs
Mypugfrank 2 years ago
OMG i can see it now.John Cena and triple h fighting on a ladder for the case and me wondering how the fuck wwe ruined money in the bank
KingBurkey 2 years ago
"Hello all and welcome to this," priceless.
Y2JTFR 2 years ago
It's nice to see wwe finally acknowledge that business sucks and they have to improve the product, but i can't help but feel like some of these moves are ridiculous. they want their ppvs to have an identity, so.. they get rid of Survivor Series, the most popular gimmick ppv franchise in wrestling history. Perhaps next they'll completely squander the opportunity to capitalize on the success of the major wcw ppv franchises that they purchased the right to use (oh wait, they already did that).
mickeybabylon 2 years ago
well said. wwe dosen't need more gimmick ppv's, they need to revive their current 1's. Nobody wants 2 see extreme rules without blood!
nfdog 2 years ago
this goes 2 show how much wwe cares about the fans that've been with them for years, i mean MY GOD, FATAL 4 WAY!!!!!!!!WTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! in my opinion their returning bac 2 the gimmick days of th 80's. i hope ur wrong about mitb @Mania to Tslayer
X360H911 2 years ago
@X360H911 hes wrong
luisalexander70 2 years ago
Personally, the WWE should make the King of the Ring tournament a PPV and use the stipulation that was used in 2002 when Brock Lesner won it: The winner of the KOTR would get a title shot at Summerslam. This would not only revitalize the KOTR concept, but would make Summerslam more interesting.
dthegrimm 2 years ago
MITB was one if not the best match on the Wrestlemania card it gave mid carders a main slot on the biggest PPV and had great entertainment value this just sucks.
superhappyfunslide2 2 years ago 2
God damn it, I am tired of this shit from WWE. After the last ep of ECW pissed me off so bad that I doubted I would watch WWE again, THIS shit is the final straw.
omgwtfbbq34 2 years ago
You'll still watch it.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
@Edgehead10075 I beg to differ
omgwtfbbq34 2 years ago
You'll stop watching WWE simply because the names of the PPV's are changing? That seems kind of silly to me.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
Actually, that's not what I said. If you'll read my initial comment (though i wouldn't be surprised if you forgot, because you seem to be doing a lot of argument-starting, putting down the opinions of others, and preaching WWE) you will see I said I was pissed off by the last episode of ECW. This is because they paid almost no respect to Paul Heyman or any of the other people who built ECW. So in conclusion I was not just pissed about the PPV changes, which were more expansive than just names.
omgwtfbbq34 2 years ago
Okay, so you will stop watching WWE simply because they disrespected the original ECW and are changing the names of the PPV? That still seems a bit flimsy.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
@Edgehead10075 Well, to me the changes are more than just the names, and also I am very passionate about the original ECW, so basically, yeah. But this is just the straw that broke the camel's back so to speak, as I've been wary of watching WWE (RAW at the very least) for a while
omgwtfbbq34 2 years ago
WWE is failing and TNA done shot itself in the foot. Basically, ROH needs mainstream help so it can save wrestling.
antiembishop07 2 years ago 6
the money in the bank in july will probably be a "royal rumble" to summerslam since they want summerslam to be like a wrestlemania in the summer. the winner of that match will get a title shot at summerslam while the winner of the wrestlemania mitb will get a title shot at any time over the course of a year.
macdaddy4591 2 years ago
if MITB will bcme its own ppv, then what will happen to the MITB winners? its a basic waste off time. fatal 4 is the dummest ppv match gimmick evr. xwwelegendhdxv1 has a video about matt and jeff tlkin bout nxt. and jeff said its a chance that he might show up there
thedeadmanfan09 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think that a "wait and see" approach is needed when dealing with all of wrestling in the U.S. right now. I have no problem with PPVs having a theme as long as it's done in a logical manner. That said, most people feel that the WWE fails to do this. WWE and the fans have to remember that what's happening now needs to lead to something bigger and/or better for later. Maybe taking MITB out of Wrestlemania is bad, but we won't know for sure until later.
flyinryanyoder 2 years ago
Comment removed
flyinryanyoder 2 years ago
Vince has gone insane, i will stop watching after wrestlemania and go to TNA.
The fact that backlash offers a good PPV normally and replacing it with retarded etreme rules makes me sick. I guarentee this will hitt hem right back in the face. The other PPV changes are retarded too. WWE is pathetic.
ToM2CoOL 2 years ago 2
TNA sucks.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
Well WWE the way it's going will suck more than TNA. I don't particularly like either, but if i had to choose one TNA would interest me more if it wasnt for wrestlemania around the corner.
ToM2CoOL 2 years ago
TNA is interesting because people want to see where the train wreck is going to go.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
exactly what i think i reallt want to know what hogan will do next ( booking wise or storyline wise )
hogans booking may be stupid but it does make me want to know whats happening. UNLIKE WWE
ToM2CoOL 2 years ago
All of this does make me wonder who is coming up with these ideas in the WWE. Whoever it is they are doing a good job of trying to be like Vince Russo...
Aniwazoa 2 years ago
fatal four way ppv = fail
civilwarfare101 2 years ago 7
I get the feeling every time Vince hears a toilet flushing he thinks he's having a good idea...
herbgardner420 2 years ago 6
How come that since TNA has the gimmick PPV Lockdown the idiots at WWE had to make ALL of their fucking PPVs have some sort of gimmick??
AmericanNohbuddy 2 years ago
I don't think that this is in any way a response to Lockdown.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
mitb made was the best match at wm for the last few years why take it off the card??
michaeljohnfalsey 2 years ago
I think the fact that is is one of the better matches IS why it's possibly on it's way out. If it featured HHH and/or HBK it would be a different story, but instead outshines the top tier guys matches. It's beyond a travesty that Benjamin has never won anyway, as he steals the show.
herbgardner420 2 years ago
I hope this "Wild Card" show won't be another Taboo Tuesday/Cyber Sunday?.
steeltownbrown52 2 years ago
Backlash PPV = WM rematches
killswitchred19 2 years ago 2
If WWE is going head to head with TNA on Monday Nights they must do away with PG, and Money in the Bank is always the best match on Wrestlemania so I won't order WM if MITB isn't there!
atenchifan 2 years ago
No, they don't need to do away with PG, and they're not going to.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
Money In The Bank=The real start of the road to Wrestlemania?
MREB414 2 years ago
its pathetic
thefightingclub1 2 years ago
My main grip about the PPV changes is the June one. "Fatal Four Way", I'm mean come on.
animetagger1 2 years ago
fatal 4 way hahahahahah gosh that is horrible
LIGHTUPBOB1987 2 years ago 4
What's next a bra and panties PPV where every match (even the men) have to compete in bra and panties matches?
doomguy2gay 2 years ago
the way i see it, it doesn't matter if wwe just wants to experiment, nor does it matter if they had one of their big four up against a ufc event on a november weekend, they shouldn't do away with survivor series. that may not be the most intriguing of the four -- not as intriguing as it once was, but there's a lot of history thats been made at survivor series. i think replacing it basically says "forget everything u thought happened, it never happened."
showstopper316 2 years ago 2
anyone else subscribed 2 matt hardys youtube account?
Rjgmanc 2 years ago
@Rjgmanc No.
Mizfit51 2 years ago
i didnt literally mean 10 minutes, but the last couple of matches have been pretty short, i think thats what hurt the match at wrestlemania 25, great, just needed more time. the wwe decided to give more time to a kid rock performance than 2 matches from the match card combined, i just think that if they put this on a ppv where its centered around the mitb match itself, we might see a longer match where they will get the oppurtunity to have an amazing match, but i might be wrong
why2beyou 2 years ago
MIIB will deffiatly be a tournement, but havnt wwe learned anything from tna or eventhem sleves King of the ring sucked, no one liked it, against all odds sucked, and how havnt they learned that tournement ppvs dont work in teh US in japan they work very well, but not wwe or tna.
ADYG9 2 years ago
@ADYG9 That's not true at all. The King of the Ring was very successful in 2001 and 2002.
Mizfit51 2 years ago
@Mizfit51 well in buy rates it could of been but teh matches were shit, and kotr 2002 sucked, brock lesner won it and during this time period he was a low carder, and wanst ready for teh main event, if vince was smart he would of let van dam win.
ADYG9 2 years ago
@ADYG9 It sucked? Excuse me? RVD/Lesnar was a great match, I have no clue what you're on about.
And duh, WWE pushed Lesnar fast, because he was going to be huge, and correct me if I'm wrong.. But he was one of the most over guys in the WWE within 6 months of that point.
He was talented, he had draw, he looked the part, he's huge. You could market him as the top-tier monster that was fresh and WWE was lacking at the time.
KOTR was for making new stars, and that's exactly what it did.
Mizfit51 2 years ago
KOTR for the most part did suck. WWE doesn't like tournments becouse they feel they get in the way of there booking plans.
TSlay1974 2 years ago
Austin 3:16 in 1996
24varner 2 years ago
Yeah, I get that. There were some total booking fails in KOTR itself as well... Billy Gunn? Really? Billy Bitchcakes won?
But regardless, I like how they did it in 2008 (not the people in it, but the concept). Having a tournament on RAW, though I would have stretched it out over a few weeks, then put the finals on a PPV card for a solid filler.
It's not so much that tournaments in WWE don't work, it's that booking has yet to find a way to MAKE them work.
Mizfit51 2 years ago 2
@Mizfit51 "Oh dear god, my names Billy! I just won KOTR, but there's just one problem: everybody still thinks that I absolutely SUCK!" lol
omgwtfbbq34 2 years ago 2
Another bad thing about all these gimmick PPV is that they take away from the story. Afew gimmick PPV is ok, but when ALL PPV have gimmicks, it takes away from the story. Like say two guys are feuding and the way the story is told would make sense for the feud to end with a Ladder Match. Well now they can't, or if they do, they have to wait until TLC comes around. So I agree, most of these PPV changes are WWEs sadly obvious attempt to draw in more viewers.
ElfenLied619 2 years ago
"..Tna has way too many gimmicks..." lol, that's what people used to say. I'm glad i haven't seen anybody on here defending wwe..
If MITB is not on the WM card, what will guys like Kofi and Morrison do? I mean year after year we are reminded of how talented Shelton Benjamin is and now they will be relegated to saying hello in a backstage segment or in some stupid battle royal....I can just see it now, next MITB will have HHH, Cena, Orton Sheamus.......boy o boy, that sounds fun!
ratnick 2 years ago 2
I think PG Extreme Rules an work, it just is really hard to do. I mean, remember Undertaker vs Edge for the World Title at Extreme a few years back. That was a good match, was extreme, and by how hard they could've gone was fairly PG. So I must disagree that Extreme Rules can't work, but I do believe having it after WrestleMania is BAD placement of the PPV
ElfenLied619 2 years ago 2
Yeah also last year's Extreme Rules was pretty good to. So I ain't all that upset either. Just Backlash and Armageddon were the more popular out of the monthly shows.
steeltownbrown52 2 years ago
Any body ever watch simpson porn or family guy porn? lmao
eastcountybadass 2 years ago
They should changed survivor series to "holloween havoc "
eastcountybadass 2 years ago
Halloween Havoc takes place in October, Survivor Series took place Thanksgiving day weekened
doomguy2gay 2 years ago
Actually Survivor Series could take place on any Sunday in November.
Edgehead10075 2 years ago
Tslay smokes new ports
eastcountybadass 2 years ago
eastcountybadass smokes cock
doomguy2gay 2 years ago
Let me spell it out B U Y R A T E S!!!!!
CmPunkMark6 2 years ago
I also saw some of the PPV Changes, the gimic names are kinda anoying, I hope wild card follows a taboo tuesday approach and give the fans a choice.
Chewbacca7304 2 years ago
They should've added King of the Ring PPV
CesarManiaX 2 years ago
There's no MITB match at Wrestlemania
CesarManiaX 2 years ago
The Money In The Bank PPV is going to be either one of two thing:
1. No more MITB match at WM
2. OR..The MITB winner could ONLY cash in the mitb case at the MITB PPV
Stupid concepts no matter which one it is.
MitsuharuMisawaRIP 2 years ago 2
As for MITB, I heard they were doing qualifiers next week, but we'll see.
If its gone from Mania, I'm not going to weep. Its fun, but not a necessity. They did 20 shows without it, & I would rather the Ladder match be used for big grudge & title matches like it was at X, 2000, & X-Seven. MITB even kind of took away from the Hardy match last year because everything they did seemed to pale in comparison to that car wreck that was MITB. Also, how many times can you have a guy steal a title?
NYG4LIFE123 2 years ago
Yeah but how many of those PPVs where good as the 5 after? How much did that have to do with MITB
TSlay1974 2 years ago
Honestly, I enjoyed most Manias prior to MITB's conclusion. Its all opinion, but the only ones I can honestly say I didn't like were 11, 13, 15, & 16 and even those had some saving graces (except 11...that was just awful) .
I feel like MITB is kind of the same thing every year. Its never bad, but after a while they start to run together. If they keep it. Cool. If they don't keep it, fine as long as you come up with a cool way to fill the spot. I just dont feel its a must have is all.
NYG4LIFE123 2 years ago
I can't wait until Wrestlemania is renamed "Big Important Singles Match"
They aren't going to stop until every PPV is named after a gimmick match are they?
NYG4LIFE123 2 years ago 4
I know! I feel that this is something TNA would do. Also speaking of TNA, they are talks of having 6-8 PPV's a year.
CesarManiaX 2 years ago
Truthslayer i dont see why everytime WWE changes PPVs people feel they have to bitch and complain about it these PPVs that the WWE are changing could be good PPVs you never know.
ultimator50 2 years ago
mitb is the only thing dat made wm 24 good an it sux dat there taking it away da yr. b4 wm 27 when it comes to atl and i will b there but it sux mitb isn't gonna b there
ebpw 2 years ago
are they trying to copy UFC with the names of the Main events, but instead of names of the partisipants, they do the matches, Elimination Chamber, Hell In a Cell, Exstream Rules.
NicoTheUnique 2 years ago
If people are ordering WM just for MITB thats an indicator that they really need to work on a lot of other areas because to me MITB should be one of the least factorrs you order that PPV. You SHOULD order the PPV for the main event and if you arent then WWE is not doing their job. The problem isn't the names its that they're replacing these slots with ALL gimmick PPVs. Doing a whole year of gimmick PPVs is just silly.
TheKenolaBar 2 years ago
with the crappy ppv names Vince will not get "money in the bank"
wwetna100 2 years ago 2
Oh gee, what are they gonna call the ppvs next year? WWE PPV Tag Team? WWE PPV Singles?
UCSM22 2 years ago
@UCSM22 there were rumors that wild card was going to be called "WWE Double Trouble" which was gonna be a tag team ppv
wwetna100 2 years ago
New ppv next year ..
WWE Kids
JLYKheroes2 2 years ago
I think some people are making too big a deal about this. So the WWE is trying out some new PPVs. What's so wrong with that? May I remind some of you that when they put out new PPVs last year, all of them but one (Breaking Point) got decent buyrates. Not to mention that Bragging Rights and TLC were actually good shows. I say let's give them a chance and see what will be on the shows before you start your complaining.
StyxRocks1979 2 years ago
The worst one is the ending of Survivor Series ppv. And a ppv called "Fatal Four Way"? WTF?
JLYKheroes2 2 years ago
Does anyone know wat ppv will be shown on sky sports and sky box office in the UK and IRELAND?
JASONTHATONEKID 2 years ago
I think people are looking at the Money in the Bank idea the wrong way. I think the Money in the Bank match will still be at WM, but the WWE just scrapped the whole cash it in whenever idea and give him the title shot at his own PPV against whichever champion he wants, (basically he's the Spring Royal Rumble Winner)
WWE must have realized that guys just cashing in MitB results in no build up of a guy and gets no pay off becuase it could happen anywhere. Just my take though, I could be wrong
WweJth 2 years ago
damn, that's actually a pretty good idea, never really thought about that. although, it does take that unpredictable element away from the mitb winner being able to cash in whenever he wants, that is still an interesting concept.