I can't believe people actually buy into this outdated expanding earth garbage. One would think that the Tohoku earthquake would have put his silly idea to rest.
My theory is that the earths core is cooling and have been since like forever alowing magma closer to the surface to cool and become solid.Techtonic movement does the rest!Also we're bombarded with tons of spacestone each day gradualy building up mass to our planet!
@nenepista At the same time, idea that india had crashed into asia and thus generating Himalayas sounds crazy too, why would there be a huge stretching marks between india and Himalaya?
@cyberdaemon compare it to two cars crashing head on: they get damaged on the front, the rest stays more or less as it is (ok that's simplified, but still..)
What dumb people can reject this???? It is so blatently OBVIOUS the earth was smaller!!! How the heck did the land under the seas get there derrr!!!!! Only EVIL morons with a wicked agenda would keep the truth from the people! Damn you evil bastards! May God tear you to peices!
I believe the theory. Simply said if you ever spin a ball of clay for long periods of time, the shape becomes more oval like and the sides expand futher out than rest of the object. The Earth is not a full circle it's more of a sphere with expanded sides.So this theory can have some relevence and truth because earth itself has been spinnimg for approxamately 4 1\2 billion years.
@TheKoodude7 The ball of clay isn't expanding, however. It is merely changing shapes. This is different from what this theory is stating. This theory is stating that over the years, the planet has grown in size. This is impossible since it goes against Conservation of Matter.
Perhaps as the Earth was "smaller" it was nearly or totally covered in water and as it "grew" the water spread out. Meaning that fossils of are mostly found directly on land. A scientific law states that matter can't be created or destroyed and neither can energy. So matter could be created by converting energy to matter.
Berge müssten beim Wachsen der Erde verschwinden, weil sie glattgezogen würden. Außerdem wäre eine Veränderung wichtiger Naturkonstanten, auch heute noch messbar, aber Fehlanzeige.
@2N0XiC4u by consuming its mantel. Thats why old shit is below and new shit goes ontop.
It eats the under layer of the mantel making more magma to expand, releasing the excess via volcano that eventually add another layer to the earth that pushes the old layer back down untill eventually it gets eaten again.
If your question is about natue and the answer is not cyclic its not the right answer.
@scottgioia The hottest temps on the surface is (that isn't disputed )134.1F. and that was in 1913. Your not going to get near enough heat to cause the expansion you are claiming .
@2N0XiC4u I think it would be pressure just inside the earth. If you heat a paint can up well what happens? The Gas expands cause the can to bulg eventually exploding! Its not that mass is just coming from no where, its that the hot core is creating gas to expand the earth. This is what I might believe but im still investigating this all. I am no scientist but the tectonic plates just seems strange to me. I mean it is strange to say that india just broke away for no reason.
You so, completely misrepresent the science - India did NOT "float" across the sea! Learn something you ignoramus!
They are actually MEASURING the rate at which the Indian sub-continent is smashing into Eurasia - but as with all people who are deep in the throws of denial and self-absorbed realities, no facts will convince you of the truth until you acknowledge the possibility that you are wrong.
What I don't get is your motive. AGW deniers have a strong and clear motive, but what's yours?
What morons are you quoting for what is commonly believed?
The mechanism is plate techtonics. This is observed.
The impact wasn't that great, it was long and tried to force to pieces of land together. Get a piece of paper hold it flat over a table and then push it together, what happens? it forms a "mountain".
What shatters common sense is the Earth expanding, which is not observed and water just appearing out of no where to fill the gaps.
@blackjeffrey1 I don't believe the earth is expanding, I do believe the Flood of Noah caused the earth to go through many changes though as we see clearly through science and the bible.
There is zero evidence against a global flood and what do you mean "at the time of the bible" it is not just a single book but a collection of many books which dates range from a time scale of well over a thousand years.
Every major culture has a historical flood account of complete devastation. Global fossils..
@TruthSeekingOne I was talking about the flood in the Bible, i.e. at that time. The Bible contains geanologies, that include the decendents of Noah, their ages when they have kids, all the way to Jesus. This gives an idea about when the flood should have happened. It was used to stop some Egyptian tombs being dated to before the flood. That is evidence against it, as well as ring dating on trees.
@TruthSeekingOne If you just think logically about the flood, there are so many impossiblilties in it, God had to have been using magic the entire way through (including the forming of the ground below), there is no reason a sane God would have done it. It would have been far simpler to just wipe all the people out by magic.
I love this guys vids they are great but im afraid its all psuedo science, at 0:45 it shows the poor understanding of any tectonic or structural knowlege "how can an island uproot itself" let me explain simply, the bits you see sticking out of the water are not islands, they protrude into the earth mantle like sticks, you just see the top bit out of the water, imagine unbeliavable force pushing around down there thats what moves mountains, not an island crashing into whatever, WOW get a grip
Неверное предположение. Горы - зона растяжения, изостатического всплытия, которое происходит при растяжении земной коры и снятии нагрузки. Все горы раньше были глубокими осадочными бассейнами. Этого здесь не показано. Надо показывать сушу, покрытую раньше морем. Показывать инверсию бассейна. Если уж расширение - так пусть будет расширение и незачем придумывать сжатие, когда можно обойтись и без него.
Incorrect assumption. Mountains - tension area, isostatic emersion,which occurs during the tension of the earth's crust and the removal of load. All mountains earlier were deep sedimentary ponds. This here it is not shown. It is necessary to show the land, covered earlier with sea. To show the inversion of pond. If already expansion - then let will expansion and unnecessarily devise the compression, when it is possible to manage, also, without it
Ive been wondering how this theory could explain the himalayas. I am not impressed.
This video was awful. First there seems to be a misunderstanding of the plate tec. theory. If you are trying to refute something you should get that thing right. Secondly the first demonstration of the spreading made no sence. It showed the earth stretching in a manner not conducive to an expanding sphere
@TruthSeekingOne Yes, you are ignorant, ignorant of all the evidence against the global flood (at the time of the Bible), ignorant of all the other flood myths that are equally invalid.
@blackjeffrey1 My reply to start was at Rashmiranjansingh, who asked the question "why do we find fossils of sea creatures in the himalayan mountains???" to which I replied Noah's Global Flood.
Just more evidence of a flood if you chose to view the evidence as such unlike most mainstream science which uses that evidence to support other claims which are less likely to be true.
@TruthSeekingOne No, why do we not find heaps? Either the flood waters would have destroyed everything, or they would have left heaps of stuff. Why do we only find few fossils? Why don't they separate as things would settle out of a solution? Why does radiometric dating have layers dated so far apart? Why we find the layers not separating based on gravity?
Why do we find fossils on high mountains, when gravity would have pulled them to the bottom of the ocean?
We observe plate tectonics today. We see changed in how the Earth is ever day. There is evidence of plate tectonics, it is not up for debate as to if plates move.
There is no evidence of a flood.
Plate tectonics is occurring and forming mountains and destroying Japan. Plate tectonics explains the folding of the Strata, the global flood cannot. I know science, you do not. You are the ignorant one.
@rashmiranjansingh remember the flood that's how we get the sea creatures into the mountains and usually they are all deposited, collected into one spot when the water retracts.
The water was under the earths crust!!!!!!! And is was in the atmosphere!!!!!! The Holy Bible, the actual Word of God, says when Noah's flood happened, the water came from the heavens and from the deep. So the crust split open and fired water out and the water from the atmosphere fell, filling the whole earth so it was nothing but water, then the earth expanded and the water disapated to where it is now. It makes sense if you think about it. And its just a theory............. But lately I'm thi
This is beyond ridiculous. To begin with, the earth is a sphere, ie: the most perfectly regular shape found in the universe. It looks exactly the same from whichever point you look at it. Therefore, if the planet was expanding, by whatever physics principle this crappy theory doesn't even mention (because it doesn't exist), then the continents would have separated in a homogenous way.
@lepetitpoulet I think what's even more hilarious is that this theory completely ignores the existence of water. It says that the earth once was only a supercontinent. But with all that water it would have been completely under water. And with that, other so called "facts" in the theory like the same trees that grew in North America and Asia don't make sense just like the whole theory.
at 0:09 there seems to be a face(?) with what also seems to be connected to a long white ridge of mountains. together this image seems to me like a human face attached with a serpents body...
I don't get why there's such an angry reaction to this theory, it's not like (say) the difference btw "creationism" and "Darwinism", so what if the the earth expanded, or the earth was always big & continents roll about the ocean floor like massive conveyor belts, its still continents pulling apart "continental drift". it would not make much difference to "evolution" theories.
The continents DO fit together nicely on the "shrunken earth"
there are Tectonic of plates because the land is flouting in melting lava and because the frontier between the plates are moving because the hearth is rotating and have a melting center and in the middle of the Atlantic exist the bigger Cannon of planet, that are expelling lava since 4,5 billions, thats why Brasil and Africa are separated but can be put together very ease.
what about the FACT that India and Africa have the same Geological age, the same rocks, the same lanscape, and even some animals from Est Africa ??? please give YOUR EXPLANATION, mister KNOWNOTHING.
i give you another. did you know that the Matterhorn is a mountain that have in is summit a type of rock, granitic, that only exist in the North of Africa? what is your explanation. idiot ignorant
@GanEdenAustralia Turn in your car, cell phone, TV, fridge, oh and your computer!!! All those were invented by SCIENTISTS!!!! Or think before you type!
Everything is explainable IF the Earth is “breathable”, even highest mountain’s formation with limestone! I’m wandering… could be possible to combine 2 theories in one- Expanding Earth theory and Hollow Earth theory!?
@ScientificStandard I find it more funny that if you crack open any intro to geology book, a learned person can sum up the problems with EE in a nice short answer:
It did not adequately explain features such as folded mountain ranges formed by compression. But, you are dealing with pseudo science and the fact that they blame it on a conspiracy should be enough for the truly skeptical mind.
he reminds me of the linguistics of an evangelist, appealing to a persons sense of logic by using misinformation... a truth built on illusion is a lie... oh well stupid is as stupid does
Neal clearly knows nothing about convergent and divergent boundaries. I find it funny he never touches in his lectures on convergent boundaries (Such as the Mariannas trench)
all it takes to dismiss such abyssal B.S. is : a GPS device ! yes, year after year, accurate GPS readings confirm that India is indenting Asia, and that the Himalayas are growing as a result of it.
I still can't believe that anyone would keep videos like this online.... It would be... embarrassing...
My five year old laughed himself off of his chair when I told him that some people think the Earth is growing. He and I both want to know where the material is coming from to fuel the growth. *rolls eyes*
@sweetfeat1 It's actually called plate tectonics, or continental drift. Also, please look up the scientific definition of the word theory. The "only a theory" argument just shows how ignorant you are.
Neal, you are self-motivated crackpot. This is a b/s theory, and you are simply trying to make money off of impressionable people. My favorite Wiki quote on the matter is, "Adams rejects tectonics and the decades of geological and geophysical data that illustrate it. He claims that the Earth is not expanding but growing, and advocates his ideas in a DVD documentary he wrote and created". People, don't follow this guy's self-interests!!!
Wikipedia: "There is no evidence supporting expansion of the Earth: measurements with modern high-precision geodetic techniques show that the Earth is not currently increasing in size, and there is no source of energy to power expansion. This is in contrast to plate tectonics, which is supported by a large range of geological and geophysical measurements, including direct measurements of plate motions by geodesy and of subduction at plate boundaries."
all the negative comments come from University students that have read books and shit written by the same fuckknuckles that gave us the original and wrong theories, why not just stick with the earth being flat, it would be just as fucking ingorant, take your fucking UNiversity degree and stick it up your arse you ignorant wankers
Oh, and a quick note about our making matter: we don't even make full atoms. All we've ever been able to create is fundametary particles (which in and of itself requires a HUGE amount of energy to do for just ONE)...which fall apart and revert to energy near instantly after creation because matter is a pain in fucking ass to form (due to energy-matter conversion laws).
OK... I was sceptic about this idea but now I have made up my mind! This is a complete failure... Oh! And for those with doubts, earth is not hollow, or round, or plain, or expanding,...earth is a series of tubes! LOL
This is the right idea of how the earth divided up, but there was still an ocean or sea in the beginning. Will look into this idea as to how the Antediluvian world actually looked..
I would love to hear where this expansion is coming from...
No, the Earth is most definitely not expanding. It's not a gas planet. It does not shrink or expand very much, and the vast majority of when it DOES do that is relative shrinking and expanding due to gravitational forces.
Read up on tectonic plates. Get an education. It helps.
Growing?? No, it's not. And nearly every actual, peer reviewed scientist would disagree with you. And agree with me. There is absolutely no evidence to even imply this... And we can already explain these mechanisms exactly through the dynamic systems and processes we have developed and postulated as theories. And the measurements we took afterwards coincide perfectly with what we predicted.
The Earth is not growing. If anything, it might be SHRINKING.
@tskasa1 That'd be a pretty interesting study. To see if the amount of material entering the gravity well is equal to, greater than, or less than the amount of material leaving.
To be honest, outer space is so empty that it'd be near insignificant. Even within the solar system. Furthermore, every study done to date actually shows that the Earth is actually CONTRACTING (shrinking) due to the slow cooling of the earth's core.
I know, that was what I was referring to. But any significant change in size so far as the Earth is concerned would have a very noticeable impact on its size. In the universe, the more massive you are, the larger you are, usually (there are, however, notable exceptions).
Actually, this is complete and utter bullshit. We know this to be true because we have empirical data taken from geological surveys that say that the Earth IS in fact (albeit very, very slowly) shrinking due to the equally slow cooling of the core. Remember what happens when something hot, cools? (Chem 101). We don't just know it's happenign, we even know the MECHANISM THAT DRIVES IT!!
I'm also still waiting to hear the mechanism by which the Earth expands outwards... And why every single study done by every single scientific organization (ever) discredits your claim and proves it to be false. Ever. Single. Last. One.
@tskasa1 SHRINKING!? That is absolutely the most ridiculous statement Ive ever heard The earth is growing through matter production at the core. At one time all of the upper tectonic plates fit together on a smaller planet with a weaker gravity. That's why dinosaurs were able to grow so big! A sauropod in today's gravity would not be able to pump blood to his brain or even stand up for that matter. Throughout history science has always been wrong and in need of revision. Always!
Entropy goes up, not down. You cannot add energy (and therefore matter) to a system without outside intervention. First of all, matter is NOT produced at the core. At all. The core is actually slowly cooling (VERY slowly, but nonetheless cooling). For matter to be produced in a cooling core (i.e. one undergoing energy loss) you'd need to bypass the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
Furthermore, do you what kinds of energy levels it takes to create matter? We can create matter....IN A PARTICLE ACCELERATOR. Wherein each particle is traveling ridiculously close to C. Which, unless you are in a supernova, does NOT happen. To add on to this EVERY nuclear process outputs less matter than what it started with, even nuclear fusion as the energy is derived from this "loss of matter" (being VERY general here, of course).
So no, the Earth is NOT growing due to matter production. If it were, it would either require energy levels that would turn the entire earth to magma, or for the earth to blatantly violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
So, it is cooling as I've said a half dozen times. And, as we ALL know, when things cool they actually SHRINK. Extremely simple physics 101 here, people...
"Throughout history science has always been wrong and in need of revision."
Disprove for me the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Now.
"That's why dinosaurs were able to grow so big!"
OR because there was significantly more oxygen in the atmosphere allowing for more oxygen to be implicated in respiratory system, allowing larger, more efficient systems. And yes, we actually have proof for this. Earth's gravity has always been relatively constant.
@tskasa1 "earth's gravity was relatively constant" Is is science or religion? Im in the medical field. I know about physiology. I know scientists and geologists think they know everything...but guess what they dont...and neither do you You believe all the universe was created at once with a fixed volume of matter-you have no proof-who decided the magic number?-all of science must grow and change-just like everything in the universe-they dont even fully understand gravity yet!
Science. We know how gravity works more or less. And not only is there no proof to say otherwise, it would have been impossible to have done so without either a HUGE (and outside) source of matter OR for the Earth to violate the second law.
Your point? I also now find your point about the sauropod EXTREMELY funny.
"I know scientists and geologists think they know everything...but guess what they dont...and neither do you "
Wrong yet again! We don't think we know everything. Not even close. Nor do we claim to. We only claim to know what we have evidence to support and as such can prove to be right or wrong.
@tskasa1 If you dont understand the point then do some research-what is the number one factor that determines an animal's size-on land-How big is the earth? How bif was it 200 million years ago "modern cosmology" as u call it says all matter came into existence at one time in the form of a big bang-all u have is background radiation and redshift to support this-it makes more sense to think that planets and stars grow-just like life
"all u have is background radiation and redshift to support this"
Not even close.
"it makes more sense to think that planets and stars grow-"
Well, after a certain point in their life, stars DO grow, but that is due to a special effect when they start running out of fuel and they swell. But this is something unique to stars. Also, before this effect happens, stars steadily shrink at a slow rate.
"what is the number one factor that determines an animal's size-on land"
Humour me. What is it?
"if animals could grow more they would-its very simple"
Except that in many growing even more would be largely UNBENEFICIAL for them currently. They would die out quickly, but not due to the reasons you are listing.
@tskasa1 The outer size limit of any animal is going to be determined by its heart and the nature of its circulatory system. Once upon a time animals could grow extremely large because the heart did not have to work as hard in a smaller gravity-same applies for animals with an open system ie the extinct giant clam. If a heart has to be too large then it becomes inefficient and won't work. Google ultrasaur and ask yourself what kind of psi would it take to get viscous material to its head
"Once upon a time animals could grow extremely large because the heart did not have to work as hard in a smaller gravity"
Or they had hearts made of more powerful muscles in the heart, or more powerful hearts, or they had larger muscles nearing the veins. Seriously, this is not a very hard problem to fix... A combination of these could very easily solve the problem...
"If a heart has to be too large then it becomes inefficient and won't work."
You act as if that is the only mechanism that would work, and we already know it isn't. Even human body have secondary pumping mechanisms such as the muscles nearing the veins that help get the blood back to our hearts.
As I've already said, there are multiple ways to solve this problem, all of which are well known. And I'm only listing some of them.
@Remember that regardless of the size of an animal the capillary wall in the tissue should still ultimatley be the same ie 1 cell thick this is so that nutrients and waste can pass from b stream to tissue and back, if there is too high a pressure then colloidal osmotic pressure a can be thrown offalong w a # of probs- change the gravity and you change the equation and the numbers will make SENSE Im sure you know that science is ultimateley about the most logical explanation
"Im sure you know that science is ultimateley about the most logical explanation"
Which is far from your hypothesis (it actually doesn't even qualify as a hypothesis, actually....).
You have yet to provide a mechanism by how this expansion would take place, btw, please do provide for me a method by which to circumvent the laws of the known of the universe and make the Earth grow and expand from the inside out.
@tskasa1 Check out some of the other videos on this subject-there are a lot of people discussing these issues. Ultimately there is a relation between all sciences just youve been conditioned to think otherwise-no matter how many degrees you have-you want to prove your smarter than me fine go ahead-but your still wrong-Im not a geologist so I come at it from the point of comparitive biology-if animals could grow more they would-its very simple
"so I come at it from the point of comparitive biology"
Because a planet is definitely a living thing, right? This is about as intelligent an argument as the Creationist Watch Maker Argument. They compare two WHOLLY unrelated things.
"A sauropod in today's gravity would not be able to pump blood to his brain or even stand up for that matter."
Sorry, my bad. Huge mistake. I was thinking of the era of huge bugs. Sauropods actually lived during a time in which there was LESS oxygen. However, they also had massive muscles, lungs, and hearts to help them with that.
And actually, sauropods WOULD be able to stand up....
This is silly. If man comes along, and claims to have multiple solutions to "problems" that all of Academia got wrong, he himself is most likely wrong, and arrogant. Let's see, no subduction, a new theory on mountain development, Mars is growing, there was no ocean!, the moon is growing. If there were no oceans, why are ancient fish fossils found on land, why are they found on the largest mountains, where did all the water come from?
@rugnardredbeard uuuuuhm the water mass must have been the same so that's why the fish fossils are found on land and thought not to exist anymore...those fish got found lately in deep ocean again - LIVING~ ;P ...please THINK yourself? And well where the water comes from is a good question but the old theory doesn't explain that either so don't expect that from this one! xD
i watch these videos because i enjoy them on a creative level. your shocking lack of understanding of BASIC scientific principles is a sad commentary on humanity in general.
defend your idiocy with personal attacks if you feel the need.
This makes perfect sense. If the universe is expanding, why not all the planets as well. All things grow, so why not the earth. The earth was probably mostly covered in water. That’s why we find fossils of marine life in the center of land masses. Anyone that can’t see this elementary explanation is a conservative and believes the earth is only 10,000 years old and man road dinos, lol (Bible Thumpers). People are definitely expanding too, fatso.
@tikimandude112 this theory is bullshit.I was lost there for a there minute!
TheKoodude7 1 week ago
Who wastes precious life time to produce such GARBAGE?
greenstring1 1 month ago
I can't believe people actually buy into this outdated expanding earth garbage. One would think that the Tohoku earthquake would have put his silly idea to rest.
danschaoticmind 2 months ago
Lol it's hard to believe this vid is serious.
I can discredit scientific evidence as long as I can make up excuses...
What a joke
SuperMiniTitan 3 months ago
fascinatingly stupid. Epic moronic fail. Pretty CGI do not make up for scientific illiteracy
geogarfield26 3 months ago
My theory is that the earths core is cooling and have been since like forever alowing magma closer to the surface to cool and become solid.Techtonic movement does the rest!Also we're bombarded with tons of spacestone each day gradualy building up mass to our planet!
Tarantino880 3 months ago
good vid
yourmajezty 3 months ago
bullshit
sstan1337 3 months ago
you should keep your mindless bullshit to your self moron.
BarbaricMoose 3 months ago
Actually his rockets attached t India made a lot more sense then his actual theory.
bustermk2 4 months ago
this has to be the dumbest idea ever.
RSKullcrusha 4 months ago
Neal Adams theory in Quran 1400 years ago :
79:30. And the earth, moreover, hath He extended ;
31. He draweth out therefrom its water and its pasture;
32. And the mountains hath He firmly fixed;-
lahoucine66 4 months ago
@nenepista At the same time, idea that india had crashed into asia and thus generating Himalayas sounds crazy too, why would there be a huge stretching marks between india and Himalaya?
cyberdaemon 4 months ago
@cyberdaemon compare it to two cars crashing head on: they get damaged on the front, the rest stays more or less as it is (ok that's simplified, but still..)
DaMastaOfRoad 3 months ago
who in the fuck would believe this. only a simpleton.
jofus3456 5 months ago 2
I think both theories are correct, now lets all come together for a group hug.
spinmaxx 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What dumb people can reject this???? It is so blatently OBVIOUS the earth was smaller!!! How the heck did the land under the seas get there derrr!!!!! Only EVIL morons with a wicked agenda would keep the truth from the people! Damn you evil bastards! May God tear you to peices!
GanEdenAustralia 6 months ago 3
No conservation violation if the earth core is absorbing (i.e. neutrinos) mass from the sun.
whig01 6 months ago
@whig01 major physics fail.
raverdeath100 6 months ago 2
@Himeslnu It's expanding end of story.
TheKoodude7 7 months ago
I believe the theory. Simply said if you ever spin a ball of clay for long periods of time, the shape becomes more oval like and the sides expand futher out than rest of the object. The Earth is not a full circle it's more of a sphere with expanded sides.So this theory can have some relevence and truth because earth itself has been spinnimg for approxamately 4 1\2 billion years.
TheKoodude7 7 months ago
@TheKoodude7 The ball of clay isn't expanding, however. It is merely changing shapes. This is different from what this theory is stating. This theory is stating that over the years, the planet has grown in size. This is impossible since it goes against Conservation of Matter.
HimesInu 7 months ago
@TheKoodude7 but the volume would stay the same
tikimandude112 1 week ago
Perhaps as the Earth was "smaller" it was nearly or totally covered in water and as it "grew" the water spread out. Meaning that fossils of are mostly found directly on land. A scientific law states that matter can't be created or destroyed and neither can energy. So matter could be created by converting energy to matter.
ZaoHuZhua 7 months ago
How on earth can people be so stupid? What on earth would cause such an expansion? Where would all of the extra material come from?
aerhearts 7 months ago
@aerhearts a balloon do'nt need much extra material to expand. and the earth is round like a balloon. it is rounda likea ur head.
TheIdeasMatrix 7 months ago
Neal you should get out the door more often
try walking and you will see that the earth is flat! not baal shaped...just flat¨
That my theory. its not perfect...but its a lot better then yours^^
cashdaddyg 7 months ago
lol
BadCompany98 7 months ago
interesting video.......v usefull
Measonz 7 months ago
What the fuk are you smoking Neil, Please Share
MrJamenard 8 months ago
Berge müssten beim Wachsen der Erde verschwinden, weil sie glattgezogen würden. Außerdem wäre eine Veränderung wichtiger Naturkonstanten, auch heute noch messbar, aber Fehlanzeige.
Stoertebekerxxx 8 months ago
have to agree with some of the comments here, in particular (we find sea fossils on the tops of mountains) that kind of nails it for me :)
source5234 8 months ago
so where does all the extra material comes from to make the earth grow?
2N0XiC4u 8 months ago 6
@2N0XiC4u by consuming its mantel. Thats why old shit is below and new shit goes ontop.
It eats the under layer of the mantel making more magma to expand, releasing the excess via volcano that eventually add another layer to the earth that pushes the old layer back down untill eventually it gets eaten again.
If your question is about natue and the answer is not cyclic its not the right answer.
geebus80 6 months ago
@2N0XiC4u inside the earth!
GanEdenAustralia 6 months ago
@GanEdenAustralia That doesn't follow the conservation of matter law...
2N0XiC4u 6 months ago
@2N0XiC4u That's simple. The truth is the Earth is heated by the sun and expands as it gets warmer. There is actually no gain of mass.
scottgioia 5 months ago
@scottgioia The hottest temps on the surface is (that isn't disputed )134.1F. and that was in 1913. Your not going to get near enough heat to cause the expansion you are claiming .
Theimmortalwhitewolf 5 months ago
@2N0XiC4u No extra mass is needed to expand if the earth is hollow.
scaloi 3 months ago
@2N0XiC4u I think it would be pressure just inside the earth. If you heat a paint can up well what happens? The Gas expands cause the can to bulg eventually exploding! Its not that mass is just coming from no where, its that the hot core is creating gas to expand the earth. This is what I might believe but im still investigating this all. I am no scientist but the tectonic plates just seems strange to me. I mean it is strange to say that india just broke away for no reason.
MtthwSmmns 3 months ago
@2N0XiC4u Bulge sorry.
MtthwSmmns 3 months ago
@2N0XiC4u space, via meteorites etc
TheFennahh 1 month ago
neal your a dumb ass
brianhar100 8 months ago 2
You so, completely misrepresent the science - India did NOT "float" across the sea! Learn something you ignoramus!
They are actually MEASURING the rate at which the Indian sub-continent is smashing into Eurasia - but as with all people who are deep in the throws of denial and self-absorbed realities, no facts will convince you of the truth until you acknowledge the possibility that you are wrong.
What I don't get is your motive. AGW deniers have a strong and clear motive, but what's yours?
Pandonodrim 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is like creationism, it's just too stupid to argue.
RCNxxInciner8 8 months ago
What morons are you quoting for what is commonly believed?
The mechanism is plate techtonics. This is observed.
The impact wasn't that great, it was long and tried to force to pieces of land together. Get a piece of paper hold it flat over a table and then push it together, what happens? it forms a "mountain".
What shatters common sense is the Earth expanding, which is not observed and water just appearing out of no where to fill the gaps.
blackjeffrey1 8 months ago
@blackjeffrey1 I don't believe the earth is expanding, I do believe the Flood of Noah caused the earth to go through many changes though as we see clearly through science and the bible.
There is zero evidence against a global flood and what do you mean "at the time of the bible" it is not just a single book but a collection of many books which dates range from a time scale of well over a thousand years.
Every major culture has a historical flood account of complete devastation. Global fossils..
TruthSeekingOne 8 months ago
@TruthSeekingOne I was talking about the flood in the Bible, i.e. at that time. The Bible contains geanologies, that include the decendents of Noah, their ages when they have kids, all the way to Jesus. This gives an idea about when the flood should have happened. It was used to stop some Egyptian tombs being dated to before the flood. That is evidence against it, as well as ring dating on trees.
blackjeffrey1 8 months ago
@TruthSeekingOne If you just think logically about the flood, there are so many impossiblilties in it, God had to have been using magic the entire way through (including the forming of the ground below), there is no reason a sane God would have done it. It would have been far simpler to just wipe all the people out by magic.
There is zero evidence for a global flood.
Also, what is the flood myth of the Australians?
blackjeffrey1 8 months ago
I love this guys vids they are great but im afraid its all psuedo science, at 0:45 it shows the poor understanding of any tectonic or structural knowlege "how can an island uproot itself" let me explain simply, the bits you see sticking out of the water are not islands, they protrude into the earth mantle like sticks, you just see the top bit out of the water, imagine unbeliavable force pushing around down there thats what moves mountains, not an island crashing into whatever, WOW get a grip
Gail940 9 months ago
How can it be expanding from nothing though, where is all this extra matter coming from? Is the core of the earth expanding?
69MrUsername69 9 months ago
crap !!!!
sailingwest 9 months ago
Неверное предположение. Горы - зона растяжения, изостатического всплытия, которое происходит при растяжении земной коры и снятии нагрузки. Все горы раньше были глубокими осадочными бассейнами. Этого здесь не показано. Надо показывать сушу, покрытую раньше морем. Показывать инверсию бассейна. Если уж расширение - так пусть будет расширение и незачем придумывать сжатие, когда можно обойтись и без него.
TheDmitryZ 10 months ago
Translated for those who can't read Russian.
Incorrect assumption. Mountains - tension area, isostatic emersion,which occurs during the tension of the earth's crust and the removal of load. All mountains earlier were deep sedimentary ponds. This here it is not shown. It is necessary to show the land, covered earlier with sea. To show the inversion of pond. If already expansion - then let will expansion and unnecessarily devise the compression, when it is possible to manage, also, without it
sicwitit1981 9 months ago
Ive been wondering how this theory could explain the himalayas. I am not impressed.
This video was awful. First there seems to be a misunderstanding of the plate tec. theory. If you are trying to refute something you should get that thing right. Secondly the first demonstration of the spreading made no sence. It showed the earth stretching in a manner not conducive to an expanding sphere
SC2Addict 10 months ago
Neal Adams is a retard
nickrose83 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If the Indian sub-continent was already fixed with eurasia, why do we find fossils of sea creatures in the himalayan mountains???
rashmiranjansingh 10 months ago
If the Indian sub-continent was already fixed with eurasia, why do we find fossils of sea creatures in the himalayan mountains???
rashmiranjansingh 10 months ago 8
@rashmiranjansingh Haha.. I was just about to type the same thing.
Kevo216666 10 months ago
@rashmiranjansingh Three words: Noah's Global Flood.
TruthSeekingOne 8 months ago
@TruthSeekingOne Two words: fairy tale.
blackjeffrey1 8 months ago
@blackjeffrey1 One word: Ignorant
TruthSeekingOne 8 months ago
@TruthSeekingOne Yes, you are ignorant, ignorant of all the evidence against the global flood (at the time of the Bible), ignorant of all the other flood myths that are equally invalid.
blackjeffrey1 8 months ago
@blackjeffrey1 My reply to start was at Rashmiranjansingh, who asked the question "why do we find fossils of sea creatures in the himalayan mountains???" to which I replied Noah's Global Flood.
Just more evidence of a flood if you chose to view the evidence as such unlike most mainstream science which uses that evidence to support other claims which are less likely to be true.
TruthSeekingOne 8 months ago
@TruthSeekingOne No, why do we not find heaps? Either the flood waters would have destroyed everything, or they would have left heaps of stuff. Why do we only find few fossils? Why don't they separate as things would settle out of a solution? Why does radiometric dating have layers dated so far apart? Why we find the layers not separating based on gravity?
Why do we find fossils on high mountains, when gravity would have pulled them to the bottom of the ocean?
blackjeffrey1 8 months ago
@TruthSeekingOne Less likely to be true?
We observe plate tectonics today. We see changed in how the Earth is ever day. There is evidence of plate tectonics, it is not up for debate as to if plates move.
There is no evidence of a flood.
Plate tectonics is occurring and forming mountains and destroying Japan. Plate tectonics explains the folding of the Strata, the global flood cannot. I know science, you do not. You are the ignorant one.
Global flood is very unlikely.
blackjeffrey1 8 months ago
@rashmiranjansingh its called tsunami they tend to fling shit everywhere it shouldnt be
geebus80 6 months ago
@rashmiranjansingh remember the flood that's how we get the sea creatures into the mountains and usually they are all deposited, collected into one spot when the water retracts.
scaloi 3 months ago
@rashmiranjansingh The area was covered with water when the planet was smaller.
SpadaccinoLuciano 2 months ago
The water was under the earths crust!!!!!!! And is was in the atmosphere!!!!!! The Holy Bible, the actual Word of God, says when Noah's flood happened, the water came from the heavens and from the deep. So the crust split open and fired water out and the water from the atmosphere fell, filling the whole earth so it was nothing but water, then the earth expanded and the water disapated to where it is now. It makes sense if you think about it. And its just a theory............. But lately I'm thi
84Darkvader 10 months ago
Soon Earth will be so big it will have to move out of the solar system.
zoyclem 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHERE DOES THE EXTRA MATERIAL COME FROM? DO THE ALIENS DROP IT OFF AT NIGHT?
ieathappypills 10 months ago
WHERE DOES THE EXTRA MATERIAL COME FROM? TO THE ALIENS DROP IT OFF AT NIGHT?
ieathappypills 10 months ago
This is beyond ridiculous. To begin with, the earth is a sphere, ie: the most perfectly regular shape found in the universe. It looks exactly the same from whichever point you look at it. Therefore, if the planet was expanding, by whatever physics principle this crappy theory doesn't even mention (because it doesn't exist), then the continents would have separated in a homogenous way.
lepetitpoulet 11 months ago
@lepetitpoulet I think what's even more hilarious is that this theory completely ignores the existence of water. It says that the earth once was only a supercontinent. But with all that water it would have been completely under water. And with that, other so called "facts" in the theory like the same trees that grew in North America and Asia don't make sense just like the whole theory.
silv4hs 10 months ago
People like you are the reason I don't believe in democracy anymore. Your vote should count as much as mine?
yanksguy23 11 months ago
hahaha
secretmoongirl 11 months ago
at 0:09 there seems to be a face(?) with what also seems to be connected to a long white ridge of mountains. together this image seems to me like a human face attached with a serpents body...
jOHnDoe90250 11 months ago
cute
MrMikecurran 11 months ago
I don't get why there's such an angry reaction to this theory, it's not like (say) the difference btw "creationism" and "Darwinism", so what if the the earth expanded, or the earth was always big & continents roll about the ocean floor like massive conveyor belts, its still continents pulling apart "continental drift". it would not make much difference to "evolution" theories.
The continents DO fit together nicely on the "shrunken earth"
The water thing is a bit of a stumbling block tho
homerbear46 1 year ago
...wait a minute, are people scarred the world is gonna "pop" or "burst" or something?
Nah the "crust" is miles thick, it would be getting thinner if that was gonna happen, there'd be volcanoes everywhere...
actually...how do volcanoes fit this theory?
homerbear46 1 year ago
Everyone is forgeting something called water. how does it fit this stupid theory.
329torgue 1 year ago
This is ridiculous. What would be the motif to the supposed lie?
skitskurk 1 year ago
Comment removed
lepetitpoulet 11 months ago
there are Tectonic of plates because the land is flouting in melting lava and because the frontier between the plates are moving because the hearth is rotating and have a melting center and in the middle of the Atlantic exist the bigger Cannon of planet, that are expelling lava since 4,5 billions, thats why Brasil and Africa are separated but can be put together very ease.
raseclarbac 1 year ago
you are a idiot, stupid ignorant
what about the FACT that India and Africa have the same Geological age, the same rocks, the same lanscape, and even some animals from Est Africa ??? please give YOUR EXPLANATION, mister KNOWNOTHING.
i give you another. did you know that the Matterhorn is a mountain that have in is summit a type of rock, granitic, that only exist in the North of Africa? what is your explanation. idiot ignorant
raseclarbac 1 year ago
thats exactly what i have been thinking!! how can a piece of land stuck to the sea floor drift and move?
drecklia 1 year ago
@drecklia because the land AND the sea floor move across the oceans of MAGMA beneath the Earths crust.
wazzyb81 11 months ago
@GanEdenAustralia Your reasoning please?
Rogeeeeeeee 1 year ago
ALL MOCKERS HERE ARE WANKERS
GanEdenAustralia 1 year ago
scientists are fucking morons
GanEdenAustralia 1 year ago
@GanEdenAustralia Turn in your car, cell phone, TV, fridge, oh and your computer!!! All those were invented by SCIENTISTS!!!! Or think before you type!
kackstae 10 months ago
Everything is explainable IF the Earth is “breathable”, even highest mountain’s formation with limestone! I’m wandering… could be possible to combine 2 theories in one- Expanding Earth theory and Hollow Earth theory!?
StteIIa 1 year ago
you sound a little like john goodman ha no wonder this is funny ha
fitzy545 1 year ago
I love how the ring of fire wouldn't exist if these theories were all true.
madoriaco 1 year ago
I love how the ring of fire wouldn't exsist if these theories were all true.
madoriaco 1 year ago
Explain to me why they find limestone on the peaks of the himalayas then?
madoriaco 1 year ago
what did happen to the water??? i have not seen one thing about it! you have to look at all points if trying to prove something!
droFilDswisHa 1 year ago
again I will ask where the water came from?
micol018 1 year ago
youtube.com/watch?v=epwg6Od49e8
geomorphify 1 year ago
"if there wasnt so much evidence of this happening, this would seem like a preposterous and stupid idea" made me lul
masterful921 1 year ago
@ScientificStandard I find it more funny that if you crack open any intro to geology book, a learned person can sum up the problems with EE in a nice short answer:
It did not adequately explain features such as folded mountain ranges formed by compression. But, you are dealing with pseudo science and the fact that they blame it on a conspiracy should be enough for the truly skeptical mind.
danschaoticmind 1 year ago
he reminds me of the linguistics of an evangelist, appealing to a persons sense of logic by using misinformation... a truth built on illusion is a lie... oh well stupid is as stupid does
toamaori 1 year ago
Neal clearly knows nothing about convergent and divergent boundaries. I find it funny he never touches in his lectures on convergent boundaries (Such as the Mariannas trench)
danschaoticmind 1 year ago
@ScientificStandard
yea i was surprised that people can believe this shit
Timmay123456789 1 year ago
@Ackdacka: And your version of magma is magically generating from what source to create the new matter?
Hickersonia 1 year ago
A textbook example of utter intellectual and scientific insolvency.
KaroKoenich 1 year ago
is....is this shit for real?
Timmay123456789 1 year ago
all it takes to dismiss such abyssal B.S. is : a GPS device ! yes, year after year, accurate GPS readings confirm that India is indenting Asia, and that the Himalayas are growing as a result of it.
geogarfield26 1 year ago
Heheh. I got a good laugh at least.
Muthsera80 1 year ago
I still can't believe that anyone would keep videos like this online.... It would be... embarrassing...
My five year old laughed himself off of his chair when I told him that some people think the Earth is growing. He and I both want to know where the material is coming from to fuel the growth. *rolls eyes*
Hickersonia 1 year ago
@Hickersonia its call MAGMA
Ackdacka 1 year ago
0:14 Some manner of means?
*Facepalm* no other comment.
(And this one was made in 2005... Dont ya just love the human race?-.-)
mikstar890 1 year ago
0:14 Some manner of means?
*Facepalm* no other comment.
mikstar890 1 year ago
-rocket power-
Th3R3M1nd3r 1 year ago
Islands do not float. Tectonic plates MOVE.
taunmarc88 1 year ago
"an incredible misconception"
"so say the scientists"
"Well it is a preposterous or even stupid idea"
"it shatters common sense"
OMG this guy is a giant fart.
PooMyPanties 1 year ago
lol!!!!!
This guy is trying to argue against scientific fact - based on a theory that is so out-dated it makes the bible sound credible.
No wonder he has an american accent.
PooMyPanties 1 year ago
@PooMyPanties
Arguing against scientific fact? lol You do realize that its the Pangea THEORY.
More than 80% of what we believe today will be proven wrong in the future.
sweetfeat1 1 year ago
@sweetfeat1 It's actually called plate tectonics, or continental drift. Also, please look up the scientific definition of the word theory. The "only a theory" argument just shows how ignorant you are.
Leehofooks 1 year ago
@sweetfeat1 your a tard - i bet u get that percentage from ur ass
PooMyPanties 11 months ago
India is subducting beneath asia. There is overwhelming evidence for this.
Snuffomatica 1 year ago
Yes,theory,but theory isn't facts!Anyone can have a theory(opinion)!
vrghiks 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Neal, you are self-motivated crackpot. This is a b/s theory, and you are simply trying to make money off of impressionable people. My favorite Wiki quote on the matter is, "Adams rejects tectonics and the decades of geological and geophysical data that illustrate it. He claims that the Earth is not expanding but growing, and advocates his ideas in a DVD documentary he wrote and created". People, don't follow this guy's self-interests!!!
andyvlak 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wikipedia: "There is no evidence supporting expansion of the Earth: measurements with modern high-precision geodetic techniques show that the Earth is not currently increasing in size, and there is no source of energy to power expansion. This is in contrast to plate tectonics, which is supported by a large range of geological and geophysical measurements, including direct measurements of plate motions by geodesy and of subduction at plate boundaries."
andyvlak 1 year ago
Fucking tectonics, how do they work?
Lessien881 1 year ago
This is hilarious, in a sad kind of way.
GodofCider 1 year ago 20
@GodofCider i wonder how many time some fan of this 'theory' has called you a 'retard' so far?
idiots love that word.
cruciphile 1 year ago
@GodofCider so are u
GanEdenAustralia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have the answer for the missing volume of ocean water.
Rozettados25 1 year ago
all the negative comments come from University students that have read books and shit written by the same fuckknuckles that gave us the original and wrong theories, why not just stick with the earth being flat, it would be just as fucking ingorant, take your fucking UNiversity degree and stick it up your arse you ignorant wankers
marsape 1 year ago
Oh, and a quick note about our making matter: we don't even make full atoms. All we've ever been able to create is fundametary particles (which in and of itself requires a HUGE amount of energy to do for just ONE)...which fall apart and revert to energy near instantly after creation because matter is a pain in fucking ass to form (due to energy-matter conversion laws).
tskasa1 1 year ago
OK... I was sceptic about this idea but now I have made up my mind! This is a complete failure... Oh! And for those with doubts, earth is not hollow, or round, or plain, or expanding,...earth is a series of tubes! LOL
pickledod 1 year ago
This is the right idea of how the earth divided up, but there was still an ocean or sea in the beginning. Will look into this idea as to how the Antediluvian world actually looked..
Peace..
Larre500 1 year ago
I would love to hear where this expansion is coming from...
No, the Earth is most definitely not expanding. It's not a gas planet. It does not shrink or expand very much, and the vast majority of when it DOES do that is relative shrinking and expanding due to gravitational forces.
Read up on tectonic plates. Get an education. It helps.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 The Earth is not expanding it is GROWING
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
Growing?? No, it's not. And nearly every actual, peer reviewed scientist would disagree with you. And agree with me. There is absolutely no evidence to even imply this... And we can already explain these mechanisms exactly through the dynamic systems and processes we have developed and postulated as theories. And the measurements we took afterwards coincide perfectly with what we predicted.
The Earth is not growing. If anything, it might be SHRINKING.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 That'd be a pretty interesting study. To see if the amount of material entering the gravity well is equal to, greater than, or less than the amount of material leaving.
GodofCider 1 year ago
@GodofCider
To be honest, outer space is so empty that it'd be near insignificant. Even within the solar system. Furthermore, every study done to date actually shows that the Earth is actually CONTRACTING (shrinking) due to the slow cooling of the earth's core.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 I was thinking in terms of mass, as opposed to size. Either way though you're likely right.
GodofCider 1 year ago
@GodofCider
I know, that was what I was referring to. But any significant change in size so far as the Earth is concerned would have a very noticeable impact on its size. In the universe, the more massive you are, the larger you are, usually (there are, however, notable exceptions).
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 BTW the earth is NOT shrinking-but you believe what u want- this is america and its ok to be a moron
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"BTW the earth is NOT shrinking"
Actually, this is complete and utter bullshit. We know this to be true because we have empirical data taken from geological surveys that say that the Earth IS in fact (albeit very, very slowly) shrinking due to the equally slow cooling of the core. Remember what happens when something hot, cools? (Chem 101). We don't just know it's happenign, we even know the MECHANISM THAT DRIVES IT!!
tskasa1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Widdowson2020
"this is america and its ok to be a moron"
L-O-L
Add Hominem as well as idiocy, how beautiful.
I'm also still waiting to hear the mechanism by which the Earth expands outwards... And why every single study done by every single scientific organization (ever) discredits your claim and proves it to be false. Ever. Single. Last. One.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
Well, contracting, but they're roughly the same thing.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 SHRINKING!? That is absolutely the most ridiculous statement Ive ever heard The earth is growing through matter production at the core. At one time all of the upper tectonic plates fit together on a smaller planet with a weaker gravity. That's why dinosaurs were able to grow so big! A sauropod in today's gravity would not be able to pump blood to his brain or even stand up for that matter. Throughout history science has always been wrong and in need of revision. Always!
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
Entropy goes up, not down. You cannot add energy (and therefore matter) to a system without outside intervention. First of all, matter is NOT produced at the core. At all. The core is actually slowly cooling (VERY slowly, but nonetheless cooling). For matter to be produced in a cooling core (i.e. one undergoing energy loss) you'd need to bypass the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
Furthermore, do you what kinds of energy levels it takes to create matter? We can create matter....IN A PARTICLE ACCELERATOR. Wherein each particle is traveling ridiculously close to C. Which, unless you are in a supernova, does NOT happen. To add on to this EVERY nuclear process outputs less matter than what it started with, even nuclear fusion as the energy is derived from this "loss of matter" (being VERY general here, of course).
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
So no, the Earth is NOT growing due to matter production. If it were, it would either require energy levels that would turn the entire earth to magma, or for the earth to blatantly violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
So, it is cooling as I've said a half dozen times. And, as we ALL know, when things cool they actually SHRINK. Extremely simple physics 101 here, people...
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"Throughout history science has always been wrong and in need of revision."
Disprove for me the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Now.
"That's why dinosaurs were able to grow so big!"
OR because there was significantly more oxygen in the atmosphere allowing for more oxygen to be implicated in respiratory system, allowing larger, more efficient systems. And yes, we actually have proof for this. Earth's gravity has always been relatively constant.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 "earth's gravity was relatively constant" Is is science or religion? Im in the medical field. I know about physiology. I know scientists and geologists think they know everything...but guess what they dont...and neither do you You believe all the universe was created at once with a fixed volume of matter-you have no proof-who decided the magic number?-all of science must grow and change-just like everything in the universe-they dont even fully understand gravity yet!
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"Is is science or religion?"
Science. We know how gravity works more or less. And not only is there no proof to say otherwise, it would have been impossible to have done so without either a HUGE (and outside) source of matter OR for the Earth to violate the second law.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"I know about physiology."
Your point? I also now find your point about the sauropod EXTREMELY funny.
"I know scientists and geologists think they know everything...but guess what they dont...and neither do you "
Wrong yet again! We don't think we know everything. Not even close. Nor do we claim to. We only claim to know what we have evidence to support and as such can prove to be right or wrong.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 If you dont understand the point then do some research-what is the number one factor that determines an animal's size-on land-How big is the earth? How bif was it 200 million years ago "modern cosmology" as u call it says all matter came into existence at one time in the form of a big bang-all u have is background radiation and redshift to support this-it makes more sense to think that planets and stars grow-just like life
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Widdowson2020
"all u have is background radiation and redshift to support this"
Not even close.
"it makes more sense to think that planets and stars grow-"
Well, after a certain point in their life, stars DO grow, but that is due to a special effect when they start running out of fuel and they swell. But this is something unique to stars. Also, before this effect happens, stars steadily shrink at a slow rate.
"just like life"
Not. Even. Close.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"what is the number one factor that determines an animal's size-on land"
Humour me. What is it?
"if animals could grow more they would-its very simple"
Except that in many growing even more would be largely UNBENEFICIAL for them currently. They would die out quickly, but not due to the reasons you are listing.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 The outer size limit of any animal is going to be determined by its heart and the nature of its circulatory system. Once upon a time animals could grow extremely large because the heart did not have to work as hard in a smaller gravity-same applies for animals with an open system ie the extinct giant clam. If a heart has to be too large then it becomes inefficient and won't work. Google ultrasaur and ask yourself what kind of psi would it take to get viscous material to its head
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"Once upon a time animals could grow extremely large because the heart did not have to work as hard in a smaller gravity"
Or they had hearts made of more powerful muscles in the heart, or more powerful hearts, or they had larger muscles nearing the veins. Seriously, this is not a very hard problem to fix... A combination of these could very easily solve the problem...
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"If a heart has to be too large then it becomes inefficient and won't work."
You act as if that is the only mechanism that would work, and we already know it isn't. Even human body have secondary pumping mechanisms such as the muscles nearing the veins that help get the blood back to our hearts.
As I've already said, there are multiple ways to solve this problem, all of which are well known. And I'm only listing some of them.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Remember that regardless of the size of an animal the capillary wall in the tissue should still ultimatley be the same ie 1 cell thick this is so that nutrients and waste can pass from b stream to tissue and back, if there is too high a pressure then colloidal osmotic pressure a can be thrown offalong w a # of probs- change the gravity and you change the equation and the numbers will make SENSE Im sure you know that science is ultimateley about the most logical explanation
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"Im sure you know that science is ultimateley about the most logical explanation"
Which is far from your hypothesis (it actually doesn't even qualify as a hypothesis, actually....).
You have yet to provide a mechanism by how this expansion would take place, btw, please do provide for me a method by which to circumvent the laws of the known of the universe and make the Earth grow and expand from the inside out.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 Check out some of the other videos on this subject-there are a lot of people discussing these issues. Ultimately there is a relation between all sciences just youve been conditioned to think otherwise-no matter how many degrees you have-you want to prove your smarter than me fine go ahead-but your still wrong-Im not a geologist so I come at it from the point of comparitive biology-if animals could grow more they would-its very simple
Widdowson2020 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"Im not a geologist"
And it shows.
"so I come at it from the point of comparitive biology"
Because a planet is definitely a living thing, right? This is about as intelligent an argument as the Creationist Watch Maker Argument. They compare two WHOLLY unrelated things.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"You believe all the universe was created at once with a fixed volume of matter-you have no proof-who decided the magic number?"
I can see you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Read up on modern cosmology.
"all of science must grow and change-just like everything in the universe-they dont even fully understand gravity yet!"
No...we don't understand QUANTUM gravity. We DO understand classical gravity.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
"A sauropod in today's gravity would not be able to pump blood to his brain or even stand up for that matter."
Sorry, my bad. Huge mistake. I was thinking of the era of huge bugs. Sauropods actually lived during a time in which there was LESS oxygen. However, they also had massive muscles, lungs, and hearts to help them with that.
And actually, sauropods WOULD be able to stand up....
tskasa1 1 year ago
@Widdowson2020
Also, if a saroupod were alive today it would die quickly. Not from lack OF oxygen. But much more likely due to an abundance of it. Oxygen poisoning.
tskasa1 1 year ago
This is silly. If man comes along, and claims to have multiple solutions to "problems" that all of Academia got wrong, he himself is most likely wrong, and arrogant. Let's see, no subduction, a new theory on mountain development, Mars is growing, there was no ocean!, the moon is growing. If there were no oceans, why are ancient fish fossils found on land, why are they found on the largest mountains, where did all the water come from?
rugnardredbeard 1 year ago
@rugnardredbeard uuuuuhm the water mass must have been the same so that's why the fish fossils are found on land and thought not to exist anymore...those fish got found lately in deep ocean again - LIVING~ ;P ...please THINK yourself? And well where the water comes from is a good question but the old theory doesn't explain that either so don't expect that from this one! xD
abaex 1 year ago
hat's you answer? "retard"?
my god you are pathetic.
i watch these videos because i enjoy them on a creative level. your shocking lack of understanding of BASIC scientific principles is a sad commentary on humanity in general.
defend your idiocy with personal attacks if you feel the need.
i feel sorry for you.
cruciphile 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This makes perfect sense. If the universe is expanding, why not all the planets as well. All things grow, so why not the earth. The earth was probably mostly covered in water. That’s why we find fossils of marine life in the center of land masses. Anyone that can’t see this elementary explanation is a conservative and believes the earth is only 10,000 years old and man road dinos, lol (Bible Thumpers). People are definitely expanding too, fatso.
stophypocrisy 1 year ago
Comment removed
stophypocrisy 1 year ago
You're talking about how we can't explain how it just wonders off to Asia.
YOU CAN'T FUCKING EXPLAIN WHAT MAKES THE EARTH GROW. AND WHERE ALL THE FUCKING WATER CAME FROM.
eclipse245 1 year ago
@eclipse245 well first off! waters always been there!
420bmxer 1 year ago
@eclipse245 Magnetic materials should maintain a balance between te