10MB SD? Seriously? I don't thnik that's even enough to run Mario.
The XBOX's chip has 2 seperate GPUs, on with 12MB SD RAM and 1 with 512. The smaller chip is to render other tasks seperatlely giving more processing room for other rendering tasks.
@Schreddermann All of the Hardware in the PS3 is used, and, no xbox does not have better graphics than the PS3 dumbass. You put MW3 on an xbox and a PS3 andplay it on the same scree, sid by side, youll see yourself proven wrong.
@TheMostAwesomeHat ohhhhh u just brought something up that was 2 months old! GOOD ONE! btw same thing happened to Xbox in 2008 it went down for 3 weeks! and at least Sony was nice enough to give us 2 free games free PS Plus and free quiriocity (music) so go ahead u play all of ur hacked COD games becuz microsoft got scared cuz they were threatened to be hacked next if they didnt unban every console! atleast were good now!
First problem with the video. "BIG war between the xbox 360 and ps3 ". Lol fail. Wars are fought by soldiers with guns. Console "wars" are fought by a bunch of nerds on the internet filling comments and forums with a volley of rage and whining.
dude, xbox uses cells i belive. also speed and cores DO NOT matter, its how the game is made. if the game is made right it can run in 10mb of ram. Jeez >_> and new xboxes have wireless n, btw no one needs blueray.
@iToasterman Yes, that is the next step. But the disk also contains about 5 times more memory than the normal DVD-9 disk. Games can be bigger and better. If they would have put HD-DVD reader inside of the XBOX360 it would have had WAY more memory for games. Next generation is probably going to be streamed or downloadable games since it is more convenient but memory size is preventing it at the current time.
@iToasterman When the fuck did I ever say it would survive? DVD replaced VHS, Blu-ray replaced DVD, and streamed or downloadable materials are replacing Blu-ray. THAT is what I said. Blu-ray will probably go out of production after the PS3 stops getting produced.
lol i posted here ages ago now i have a new laptop with an nvidia GT420m 1GB cuda graphics card 4GB fast ddr3 and an i3 370m cpu @2.4ghz and it runs every game in max settings, even crysis runs with a smoth frame rate in ultra graphics settings, so now my cpu i know has 2 cores with a theoretical 4 core setup (hyperthreading) stuff consoles ive caughtup with pc gaming just in time for diablo 3.
apon further research the cell in the ps3 deals with 9 threads of informantion where as the 360 only deals with 6, the cell is still the worlds fastest and greenest CPU however if you just look up the relevant information using google and look for the cell broadband engine rather than bash the ps3 all the time with poorly researched information, 1 core and 7spe's still out performs a similar 8 core cpu, you just need to accept the cell broadband chip in the ps3 is better than the 360's cpu.
@1madnoob Wrong. Cell has two threads only, both from the PPE. The SPEs do not have threads. Also, Cell is a $38 single-core CPU with 512 KB of cache. Saying it is the fastest processor is like saying a Ford Ka is the fastest car.
@NerdyTurd307 the 360 does not have DX10, if you look at the hardware inside the 360 and also considder the release date of the console DX10 haddnt been released, the 360 uses DX9 or compares to DX9 (though i laughed so hard when the guy in the video claimed the ATI GFX only had 10mb dedicated memory "that's less than what graphics cards in 1998 had")
@NerdyTurd307 it just isnt DX10 alpha or beta, the differences between DX9 and DX10 were so small there was little point in getting vista and likewise its exactly the same for the 360, the 360 is based on DX9 hardware so i seriously doubt its able to do DX10/11 graphics routines. DX9 is no bad thing just its out dated also cosoles work differently to PC's
@lilworm147 The online is maybe a little better, but it´s stupid that your paying 50 soon to be 60 dollars to play online, a feature that you get for free on pc and ps3
@MrV4ST the online on 360 may be better if they used a decent wifi chip in the 360 s, but typical microsoft does it again "more cheap crap that unsuprisingly fails all the time" id rather have a laggy connection than one that drops all the time, no way will i ever give microsoft any more of my money (my next computer will be a mac, and my ps3 never drops "loses connection" unlike the crappy 360)
just for all 360 fanboy scum heres a link....watch?v=k1MsDfPAULA
@lilworm147 ya you got problems if you dont want a system tha performs better anyway. I prsonally dont want to pay 60 bucksa year just so i can play online when im ALREADY paying for online services as it is. do you? apparently you do, stupid ass xbox fanboy.
The ps3 does not have 7 cores idiot... it has a single core cpu but its divided into 7 and not all of them gets used so dont try making the ps3 the best and fastest console because both perform the same on all games so far........ LOOK IT UP!!!!!
@BrianxFilms well i dont care about your stupid "7 core ps3" i find it boring because i played a ps3 before and didnt like it.. i bought the xbox over the ps3 because its alot better and i didnt want to waste money on shit... sorry Sony but you just try too hard...
@NewLynxChannel the ps3 has a cell proccessor made by IBM its not a RISC proccessor and it cant be drawn as a direct comparison to a standard dual core cpu, if the ps3's cpu is just 1 core please explain what the 7 other SPE's do oh and if this is going to be a never ending argument how amny cores does the 360 have on its power PC based CPU last time i checked it had a triple core CPU using 2 threds per core, (to say the ps3's CPU has 1 core and then say it has 7 SMID units in other words cores)
@1madnoob Cell is built with IBM's PowerPC ISA, which is a RISC instruction set. Therefore, Cell is a RISC processor.
And the SPEs have different instructions, no direct access to system memory, no threads, no cache and no data pattern predictors. Therefore, they aren't cores.
@NewLynxChannel i take it you failed to notice the quick correction i made about my comment, still if you want to give out false information or altered information from the actual official spec of the cell broadband proccessor carry on for everyone else just search for "cell broadband proccessor" in google search and pretty soon youll see the real spec's of the ps3's flagship CPU.
@seancuypers hey buy whatever u want sony doesnt force u to buy the p3 ha and yes sony did try harder and did more research into their console thats y it came out later
@seancuypers WELL PS3 Achived graphics that xbox 360 won't achive in uncharted 2 but it costs a lot of money and time to the producer to code the game rightlly
@seancuypers hahahah your right. but listen, the ps3 has 1 core that has 7 spu (spe?) processors but for the most part he is right. the core and 6 out of the 7 spu's are used for gaming resourcing and the last is just for psn and XMB menu.
and hey dumb ass try to look at exclusives only. ps3 exclusives rape the shit out of xbox's. Killzone3 uncharted2 resistance2soontobe3 god of war 3 heavy rain little big planet .
and xbox has..... halo (gears is ok but kz is better)
@seancuypers If the CPU is spit into several differet cores, those act as seperate cores dedicated to Speeding up the console. its thesame exact concept in computer's. your logic is flawed.
@seancuypers wrong the cell has 1 core and 7 spe's which are controlled by the single core, spe's cant multitask so it uses one spe for each task which ends up having extreme multitasking and performance i don't want to start talking tech so i tried to explain it as basic as possible just trust me the cell is a monster
yes the ps3 does have more power BUT developers find it very difficult to access all of it . 360 attracts more developers because of its flexable and easily harnessed hardware
Bull*hit yeh ps3 has mor ram and sh#t, they both are fast, how many games on the ps3? money? Component Cable? easy to access harddrive, better to hold controllers! yeah xbox is better!!1
first the ps3 has tons of good games, second you get what you pay for, third yes component cable sucks? not getting what you are saying? cool who needs easy access to the hard drive? And forth xbox controllers are way to big and bulky, the layout is a bad design as well
@BrianxFilms No. It has 1 PPE (power processor element) that runs at 3.2 GHz. And it controls 8 synergistic processing elements (SPEs) which also run at 3.2 GHz.
One is meant for redudency, one is for the OS (XMB).
But those SPEs work very differently than a traditional Core.
The SPEs don't have an actual cache, nor do they have branch predictors.
Compared to a normal core, they are not good at general purpose computing.
@BrianxFilms If you want, sure consider those SPEs cores, but in your video, just make sure to mention that they aren't TRADITIONAL cores, because most people say it has 9 cores, which is technically incorrect.
It has one PPE (like a core), that controls 8 SPU's.
One SPU is for redundency, and the other is for OS/security.
So yes 6 SPU's are meant for gaming. you make it sound like the Xbox gpu is weaker.The Xbox GPU is actually better than the PS3's RSX. BUt the PS3 cell can do vertex calculations for graphics, so that's why exclusives look better, while multiplats are better on 360 (since they are ports), and don't take advantage of the SPUS.but nice vid
coo1001 ur fucking stupid lol there is not only one shooting game for Xbox 360 OMG UR BRAIN IS DAMAGED.............and little big planet sucks dick......!!!!
Is an Xbox 360 elite worth it or should i get the ps3 slim. I have the money to get the. Im not a hardcore gamer and i am more into creative and strategy games. I hate shooting games except for star wars battlefront 2. I also like the way xbox has awesome online and you can get add-ons. But the Ps3 has better graphics and it has cool games like fat princess. Even though my parents are rich they will only let me get one console. please tell me which should I get.
hmm i personally would go with the ps3 slim but the online is a little better on the xbox, but you do have to pay for it. Also the xbox will eventually break
so you like creative games well u should get a ps3 because it has little big planet in that you can well you would have to look it up because there is just to much to say about it the reason why you shouldent get a xbox360 is there is practically only shooting games on it you i sorta think the same way im sick of shooters but the playstaion3 network has many inovative downloadble game for cheap prices
Oh yeah and
CPU:
PS3= 1 core, 7 threads (Not really 7 cores at all)
Xbox= 3 cores. (Raw processing power)
mattocaster6 1 week ago
What you said about the 2 GPUs is bullshit.
Xbox 360= 500mhz and 512MB memory
PS3= 500mhz and 2x 256 memory
10MB SD? Seriously? I don't thnik that's even enough to run Mario.
The XBOX's chip has 2 seperate GPUs, on with 12MB SD RAM and 1 with 512. The smaller chip is to render other tasks seperatlely giving more processing room for other rendering tasks.
mattocaster6 1 week ago
FUCK YEH!!!!! PS3 FTW!
JTopouzian 1 month ago
xbox 360 got better graphics in most games.
the better hardware of the ps3 counts a shit because it wont be used.
Schreddermann 4 months ago
@Schreddermann All of the Hardware in the PS3 is used, and, no xbox does not have better graphics than the PS3 dumbass. You put MW3 on an xbox and a PS3 andplay it on the same scree, sid by side, youll see yourself proven wrong.
PoisonBlade415 1 month ago
@PoisonBlade415 how about you try it yourself and you'll see yourself proven wrong.
Its simply a fact and google for it.
Poor little PS3 Fanboy.
Schreddermann 1 month ago
@PoisonBlade415
He's right. It's harder to code a game for the PS3 therfore the 360 tends to be slightly better graphically on cross-platform games.
microsf121 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sony sucks so bad they had to make a new contract taking away your right to sue them. What losers.
RingtailNinja 4 months ago
BIAS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sbarmyman 5 months ago
You don't know what you're talking about. The PS3's RAM does not run at 3.2Ghz. It runs at 1.3Ghz
hungrybear8 6 months ago
well im just gunna say this.... PS3 must give off sum bad radiation to make your face mutate like that
Trefroy 7 months ago
the new xbox360 Is much better than ps3
letsbewhite 7 months ago
@letsbewhite its exactly the same spec wise + wifi....
simoro1 2 months ago
@simoro1 The xBox 360 does not hae AOSS wireless technology, does it? He forgot to mention that.
PoisonBlade415 1 month ago
u need clearasil..saw ur face n was like wtf
zainjan 7 months ago
Your a fanboy, some of your info is incorrect. You diss the Xbox in everything even though the GPU is truly stronger in the 360.
GlobalGaming101 7 months ago
Fuck u WE better its just 1 thing we got better Games and a lot of otrher cool stuff!
NP4CDrizzzy 8 months ago
Xbox gamers just got PWNEDDDDDD!
rays1118 8 months ago
@rays1118
yeah but I don't feel like buying a console that risks my credit card information and makes me unable to play online for months
TheMostAwesomeHat 7 months ago
@TheMostAwesomeHat ohhhhh u just brought something up that was 2 months old! GOOD ONE! btw same thing happened to Xbox in 2008 it went down for 3 weeks! and at least Sony was nice enough to give us 2 free games free PS Plus and free quiriocity (music) so go ahead u play all of ur hacked COD games becuz microsoft got scared cuz they were threatened to be hacked next if they didnt unban every console! atleast were good now!
rays1118 7 months ago
bullshit you dickface
valmadasss 8 months ago
First problem with the video. "BIG war between the xbox 360 and ps3 ". Lol fail. Wars are fought by soldiers with guns. Console "wars" are fought by a bunch of nerds on the internet filling comments and forums with a volley of rage and whining.
R3lik101 9 months ago
XDR is just another name for CHEAP DDR2 so the PS3 is left way behind.
attilagenius94 9 months ago
Yea both consoles get capped to 60 FPS or 30FPS depending on what game so performance while playing is identical. btw nice ps3 servers ;P
Paulrerepc 9 months ago
FUCK NVIDA FUCK PS3 AND FUCK MAC
spideymikey6 9 months ago
dude, xbox uses cells i belive. also speed and cores DO NOT matter, its how the game is made. if the game is made right it can run in 10mb of ram. Jeez >_> and new xboxes have wireless n, btw no one needs blueray.
iToasterman 10 months ago
@iToasterman I have the feeling that Blu-ray will replace DVD just as DVD replaces VHS.
Rider0fLightning 10 months ago
@Rider0fLightning hdd / flash is replacing the blueray disk
iToasterman 10 months ago
@iToasterman Yes, that is the next step. But the disk also contains about 5 times more memory than the normal DVD-9 disk. Games can be bigger and better. If they would have put HD-DVD reader inside of the XBOX360 it would have had WAY more memory for games. Next generation is probably going to be streamed or downloadable games since it is more convenient but memory size is preventing it at the current time.
Rider0fLightning 10 months ago
@Rider0fLightning its not the next step. its begun. Xbox wii and ps3 all have it, so does psp mac and pc. Blueay wont survive
iToasterman 10 months ago
@iToasterman When the fuck did I ever say it would survive? DVD replaced VHS, Blu-ray replaced DVD, and streamed or downloadable materials are replacing Blu-ray. THAT is what I said. Blu-ray will probably go out of production after the PS3 stops getting produced.
Rider0fLightning 10 months ago
@Rider0fLightning i didnt say u did. and screw stream, its failing too D: , btw ps3 isnt what keep blueray alive...
iToasterman 10 months ago
@iToasterman
XBOX DOES NOT have a cell processor. And none of the consoles have processors with multiple cores.
microsf121 3 weeks ago
@microsf121 apperently it does e_e and they do. look at ps3... / xbox ;D!
iToasterman 3 weeks ago
hmmm, thats intresting, i didnt know that, but didnt they replace the xbox video card with a higher one in the newer consoles? sony to with the slim.
MrNicktheparakeet 11 months ago
lol i posted here ages ago now i have a new laptop with an nvidia GT420m 1GB cuda graphics card 4GB fast ddr3 and an i3 370m cpu @2.4ghz and it runs every game in max settings, even crysis runs with a smoth frame rate in ultra graphics settings, so now my cpu i know has 2 cores with a theoretical 4 core setup (hyperthreading) stuff consoles ive caughtup with pc gaming just in time for diablo 3.
1madnoob 1 year ago
apon further research the cell in the ps3 deals with 9 threads of informantion where as the 360 only deals with 6, the cell is still the worlds fastest and greenest CPU however if you just look up the relevant information using google and look for the cell broadband engine rather than bash the ps3 all the time with poorly researched information, 1 core and 7spe's still out performs a similar 8 core cpu, you just need to accept the cell broadband chip in the ps3 is better than the 360's cpu.
1madnoob 1 year ago
@1madnoob agreed
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
@1madnoob Wrong. Cell has two threads only, both from the PPE. The SPEs do not have threads. Also, Cell is a $38 single-core CPU with 512 KB of cache. Saying it is the fastest processor is like saying a Ford Ka is the fastest car.
NewLynxChannel 1 year ago
@1madnoob What the fuck are u talking about
PS3GAMER298 7 months ago
@PS3GAMER298 lol times have changed since i made that comment a lot has changed.
1madnoob 7 months ago
@1madnoob
Too bad for the whole cell/powerxcell branch as it was cancelled by IBM. Fail.
1980szt 2 weeks ago
don't get me wrong i'm not a 360 fanboy, infact i'm more of a pc gamer, but dosn't the 360 have directX 10?
NerdyTurd307 1 year ago
@NerdyTurd307 the 360 does not have DX10, if you look at the hardware inside the 360 and also considder the release date of the console DX10 haddnt been released, the 360 uses DX9 or compares to DX9 (though i laughed so hard when the guy in the video claimed the ATI GFX only had 10mb dedicated memory "that's less than what graphics cards in 1998 had")
1madnoob 1 year ago
@1madnoob well in that case it must be like alpha or beta DX10 or something
NerdyTurd307 1 year ago
@NerdyTurd307 it just isnt DX10 alpha or beta, the differences between DX9 and DX10 were so small there was little point in getting vista and likewise its exactly the same for the 360, the 360 is based on DX9 hardware so i seriously doubt its able to do DX10/11 graphics routines. DX9 is no bad thing just its out dated also cosoles work differently to PC's
1madnoob 1 year ago
@1madnoob whatever man.
NerdyTurd307 1 year ago
yea i dont care how much outperforming it does its still sucks online so that makes it a wast of my money cause noone wants to play split screen
lilworm147 1 year ago
@lilworm147 umm online is FREE and its not split screen dumbass
BrianxFilms 1 year ago 5
@BrianxFilms
yeah but I don't feel like buying a console that risks my credit card information and makes me unable to play online for months
TheMostAwesomeHat 7 months ago
@TheMostAwesomeHat
XBOX Live went down in 2008. Do a little research before making ignorant comments like that.
microsf121 3 weeks ago
@lilworm147 The online is maybe a little better, but it´s stupid that your paying 50 soon to be 60 dollars to play online, a feature that you get for free on pc and ps3
MrV4ST 1 year ago
@MrV4ST the online on 360 may be better if they used a decent wifi chip in the 360 s, but typical microsoft does it again "more cheap crap that unsuprisingly fails all the time" id rather have a laggy connection than one that drops all the time, no way will i ever give microsoft any more of my money (my next computer will be a mac, and my ps3 never drops "loses connection" unlike the crappy 360)
just for all 360 fanboy scum heres a link....watch?v=k1MsDfPAULA
1madnoob 1 year ago
@1madnoob i agree
MrV4ST 1 year ago
@lilworm147 hahahah wrong! i've delt with 3 xbox's in my life and all of them had connection problems. while my ps3 has no problem at all!
i also get into games 2x fast on psn then on xbl.
Wilsonboy0528 11 months ago
@lilworm147 ya you got problems if you dont want a system tha performs better anyway. I prsonally dont want to pay 60 bucksa year just so i can play online when im ALREADY paying for online services as it is. do you? apparently you do, stupid ass xbox fanboy.
PoisonBlade415 1 month ago
The ps3 does not have 7 cores idiot... it has a single core cpu but its divided into 7 and not all of them gets used so dont try making the ps3 the best and fastest console because both perform the same on all games so far........ LOOK IT UP!!!!!
seancuypers 1 year ago
@seancuypers the ps3 doesnt have 7 cores? but its divided into 7? same thing dumbshit
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
@BrianxFilms well i dont care about your stupid "7 core ps3" i find it boring because i played a ps3 before and didnt like it.. i bought the xbox over the ps3 because its alot better and i didnt want to waste money on shit... sorry Sony but you just try too hard...
seancuypers 1 year ago
@BrianxFilms The PS3 doesn't have seven cores indeed. It has one core and seven RISC SIMD units.
NewLynxChannel 1 year ago
@NewLynxChannel the ps3 has a cell proccessor made by IBM its not a RISC proccessor and it cant be drawn as a direct comparison to a standard dual core cpu, if the ps3's cpu is just 1 core please explain what the 7 other SPE's do oh and if this is going to be a never ending argument how amny cores does the 360 have on its power PC based CPU last time i checked it had a triple core CPU using 2 threds per core, (to say the ps3's CPU has 1 core and then say it has 7 SMID units in other words cores)
1madnoob 1 year ago
@1madnoob Cell is built with IBM's PowerPC ISA, which is a RISC instruction set. Therefore, Cell is a RISC processor.
And the SPEs have different instructions, no direct access to system memory, no threads, no cache and no data pattern predictors. Therefore, they aren't cores.
NewLynxChannel 1 year ago
@NewLynxChannel i take it you failed to notice the quick correction i made about my comment, still if you want to give out false information or altered information from the actual official spec of the cell broadband proccessor carry on for everyone else just search for "cell broadband proccessor" in google search and pretty soon youll see the real spec's of the ps3's flagship CPU.
1madnoob 1 year ago
@1madnoob What I said wasn't either false or altered. Cell has one core and eight SIMD units, and it's decribed this way even on IBM's documenation.
NewLynxChannel 1 year ago
@seancuypers hey buy whatever u want sony doesnt force u to buy the p3 ha and yes sony did try harder and did more research into their console thats y it came out later
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
@seancuypers WELL PS3 Achived graphics that xbox 360 won't achive in uncharted 2 but it costs a lot of money and time to the producer to code the game rightlly
marospy 1 year ago
@seancuypers hahahah your right. but listen, the ps3 has 1 core that has 7 spu (spe?) processors but for the most part he is right. the core and 6 out of the 7 spu's are used for gaming resourcing and the last is just for psn and XMB menu.
and hey dumb ass try to look at exclusives only. ps3 exclusives rape the shit out of xbox's. Killzone3 uncharted2 resistance2soontobe3 god of war 3 heavy rain little big planet .
and xbox has..... halo (gears is ok but kz is better)
Wilsonboy0528 11 months ago
@seancuypers If the CPU is spit into several differet cores, those act as seperate cores dedicated to Speeding up the console. its thesame exact concept in computer's. your logic is flawed.
PoisonBlade415 1 month ago
@seancuypers wrong the cell has 1 core and 7 spe's which are controlled by the single core, spe's cant multitask so it uses one spe for each task which ends up having extreme multitasking and performance i don't want to start talking tech so i tried to explain it as basic as possible just trust me the cell is a monster
Megatronicful 1 week ago
yes the ps3 does have more power BUT developers find it very difficult to access all of it . 360 attracts more developers because of its flexable and easily harnessed hardware
conorlydon 1 year ago 3
@conorlydon
It's actually more to do with the software rather than the hardware. It's easier to code a game for the XBOX than the PS3.
microsf121 3 weeks ago
@conorlydon ps3's ram does not run at 3.2ghz and the 360's gpu is more powerful look at techno buffalo ps3 vcs xbox 360
Megatronicful 1 week ago
k u look like a giant pimple
h3insane 1 year ago
@h3insane ahahaha
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
read my previous comment you dumb fuck
h3insane 1 year ago
@h3insane give up
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
for fuck sakes im not talking about the ram im talking about the graphics cards mb you dumb fucking cunt it says right on the hardware
h3insane 1 year ago
@h3insane dude just give up u know your wrong....stop changing ur story
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
I fucking looked inside my xbox u dumb fucking cunt
h3insane 1 year ago
@h3insane ur a reatard the ram inside ur xbox is not like pc ram its a chip that does not state how much ram it has
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
512 mb for xbox lier... for graphics i wouldnt believe a word from this video anymore
h3insane 1 year ago
@h3insane look it up
BrianxFilms 1 year ago
Bull*hit yeh ps3 has mor ram and sh#t, they both are fast, how many games on the ps3? money? Component Cable? easy to access harddrive, better to hold controllers! yeah xbox is better!!1
techboy6172 2 years ago
first the ps3 has tons of good games, second you get what you pay for, third yes component cable sucks? not getting what you are saying? cool who needs easy access to the hard drive? And forth xbox controllers are way to big and bulky, the layout is a bad design as well
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
the ps3 only has 1 core and 6 sub processing units
martyncruz94 2 years ago 2
no it has 1 chip with 7 cores 1 for the os and 6 processing units, they are still cores
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
go watch xbox360 vs ps3 round 5
martyncruz94 2 years ago
they r special CORES
mega160 2 years ago
@BrianxFilms No. It has 1 PPE (power processor element) that runs at 3.2 GHz. And it controls 8 synergistic processing elements (SPEs) which also run at 3.2 GHz.
One is meant for redudency, one is for the OS (XMB).
But those SPEs work very differently than a traditional Core.
The SPEs don't have an actual cache, nor do they have branch predictors.
Compared to a normal core, they are not good at general purpose computing.
essboarder23 2 years ago
@BrianxFilms Only the PPE that controls the SPEs are what you can consider a core, since it's based on PowerPC processors.
essboarder23 2 years ago
@BrianxFilms If you want, sure consider those SPEs cores, but in your video, just make sure to mention that they aren't TRADITIONAL cores, because most people say it has 9 cores, which is technically incorrect.
essboarder23 2 years ago
agreed
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
every thing he is saying about the gpu is 100% false
martyncruz94 2 years ago
how so?
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
The PS3 doesn't have 7 cores, but 8 SPU's.
It has one PPE (like a core), that controls 8 SPU's.
One SPU is for redundency, and the other is for OS/security.
So yes 6 SPU's are meant for gaming. you make it sound like the Xbox gpu is weaker.The Xbox GPU is actually better than the PS3's RSX. BUt the PS3 cell can do vertex calculations for graphics, so that's why exclusives look better, while multiplats are better on 360 (since they are ports), and don't take advantage of the SPUS.but nice vid
essboarder23 2 years ago
coo1001 ur fucking stupid lol there is not only one shooting game for Xbox 360 OMG UR BRAIN IS DAMAGED.............and little big planet sucks dick......!!!!
MentalTheShow 2 years ago
@Mental:
yeh.... riiiiight.
lolnicolas 2 years ago
sony TV lol
playstatioNick 2 years ago
Lmao 1:00 look at the screen!!!!
shurikensa 2 years ago
the ps3 though would last longer it has the red ring of death!
rascal034 2 years ago
ps3 --> 5 xbox360 --> 0
PS3 RULES!
WillyBoyAnderson 2 years ago
Comment removed
infinitypark003 2 years ago
awsome keep it up
ADblakejelani 2 years ago
awsome vid dude make more
ainoorox9 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is an Xbox 360 elite worth it or should i get the ps3 slim. I have the money to get the. Im not a hardcore gamer and i am more into creative and strategy games. I hate shooting games except for star wars battlefront 2. I also like the way xbox has awesome online and you can get add-ons. But the Ps3 has better graphics and it has cool games like fat princess. Even though my parents are rich they will only let me get one console. please tell me which should I get.
I have a Wii DS a Mac laptop
Nym356 2 years ago
hmm i personally would go with the ps3 slim but the online is a little better on the xbox, but you do have to pay for it. Also the xbox will eventually break
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
Again that remark about that the Xbox will break. That has been fixed for months! And the PS3 will also eventually break.
Remy669 2 years ago
The PS3 still had less that 1% chance that it will break in the first year. Whereas the 360 has about 15%.
RiotYourFeelings 2 years ago
Comment removed
infinitypark003 2 years ago
so you like creative games well u should get a ps3 because it has little big planet in that you can well you would have to look it up because there is just to much to say about it the reason why you shouldent get a xbox360 is there is practically only shooting games on it you i sorta think the same way im sick of shooters but the playstaion3 network has many inovative downloadble game for cheap prices
coo1001 2 years ago
very very true
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
i like this video, i got both systems but i like the ps3 better, o u should make a new video
moreno619531 2 years ago 2
Make more! This is a really good ps3 vs 360 video. It was about hardware on this video. Subbed.
SnipeySnake 2 years ago
Thanks and i am working on more, the next one is going to be about overall price
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
Comment removed
infinitypark003 2 years ago
thanks man, and I'd have to agree with you on that one haha
BrianxFilms 2 years ago
Sweet! Im looking forward to it =)
SnipeySnake 2 years ago
woops wrong comment xD
SnipeySnake 2 years ago