Added: 2 years ago
From: mscoffman
Views: 9,221
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oscillations effect the distribution of heat throughout Earth's system, they do not effect the total amount of heat in Earth's system. When we have an El Nino its warm in the epac, and cold in the wpac, opposite is true for La Nina. Therefore it is the distribution of heat that oscillations control, not the amount of heat entering or leaving Earth. Same is true for the PDO and AMO. CO2, however, is a greenhouse gas which is proven to retain more heat in Earth's system at greater concentrations.

  • "The El Nino Southern Oscillation,cannot explain an overall buildup of global ocean heat..This points to an energy imbalance responsible for long term trend"...see the Andriod Wjdget " Skeptical Science. CSIRO WWF MET Bureaus & many other professional scientific groups see the huge for-seeable risks in ignoring the vast evidence from man significantly contributing to global warming

  • Co2 does not even warrant a mention. The cloud mystery on youtube fits well with this video.

  • this is misleading. carbon doxide can trap heat from the surface. dr roy specer is changing his toon now. C02 is not 44 percent its the main problem. just another defender fror the oil robber barons.

  • @ash4432 CO2 does not trap heat.

  • @LucifersDisciple6 yes it does retard.

  • @SDman94 Hahaha, I am not a retard useless eater.

  • this is misleading and there are tons of evidence that show C02 can trap heat. nice try its small. RIGGHHTT.

  • check out my video, i think it might be informative

  • that is a holey misleading video. i would be intrigued to see who the people behind the production of the video was. because it is of scientific consensus that the rises in CO2 are directly linked to global average temperatures. This is just yet another justification for a capitalist economy to keep polluting the environment as 'co2 has a small effect of global temperatures' that statement is rubbish. i encourage anyone to challenge me, i am a 3rd year student studying global climate..

    James

  • @jamesgee1

    I appreciate your concern James, but you have been seriously mislead. There has never been a consensus among scientists about CO2-caused warming. The last few years have seen research that pretty much decimates the man-caused theory and though no recent poll has been taken, it is likely the majority of scientists now believe warming is natural. We have no connection to any industry.

  • @mscoffman Today, the fact that human activity, through transport, industry, etc. adds (and has added) carbon (e.g. in the form of CO2) to the Earth’s atmosphere is undeniable. On the other hand, meteorological measurements slightly before, during and after the twentieth century show a mean surface temperature increase of around 0.6°C. The two facts are correlated.

    You should take a look at my video on the Oceans & Climate Change.

  • @mscoffman whatevers happening doesnt help we're exascerbating it with greenhouse effect, ocean acidifaction/eutriphication

  • @mscoffman Bullshit. Ever heard of the IPCC? Get a fucking clue. Also, oscillations effect the distribution of heat throughout Earth's system, they do not effect the total amount of heat in Earth's system. When we have an El Nino its warm in the epac, and cold in the wpac, opposite is true for La Nina. Therefore it is the distribution of heat that oscillations control. Same is true for the PDO. CO2 is greenhouse gas which does retain more heat in Earth's system at greater concentrations. dumbass

  • @jamesgee1 Capitalism?? Excuse me?! Try the many power hungry governments around the world using false and misleading science to further oppressive taxes and measures! There is not a concensus whatsoever. Scientists receive government funding to further their cause. Even if greenhouse gases caused global warming why is it that the government hides the fact that over 99% of greenhouse gases is water vapor from our oceans? Why, because they can't TAX the ocean!!

  • @jamesgee1 What is misleading is what is you and others are saying! In reaction of what they are!! We are facing a new change, not the end of World, but heavy loss of life!! Not to be disrespectful of you, cleaner is the better, but not garanties our survival! But as a clear an normal human, see the same cycle, coming again. In lesser and more heavy cycles. What are we looking for? Our survival and species, or our Planet? ???? Both would be great, but not probable!
  • @jamesgee1 please give evidence for your scientific consensus. Any papers/surveys supporting it have been thoroughly debunked. I am happy to present rebuttal.

  • @jamesgee1 Concensus means nothing to a scientist and everything to a politician. Ever considered taking up politics because you certainly know nothing of science. There is no scientific proof to link co2 with a warming Planet. co2 is a mere product of warming caused by Solar cycles. Atmospheric co2 enrichment benefits all life on the Planet. Presently the Pacific is cooling, the Atlantic is cooling , every level of the atmosphere is cooling and volcanic activity is increasing.

  • Thanks for the video

  • Finally some real science on this subject, thank you very much!

  • @NeoGen89 you should also take a look at my vid

  • Excellent!! More please!!

  • @TheTempestSpark look up richard s lindzen, MIT meteorologist, Shosiro Minobe, & Dr. Don J Easterbrook

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more