Oscillations effect the distribution of heat throughout Earth's system, they do not effect the total amount of heat in Earth's system. When we have an El Nino its warm in the epac, and cold in the wpac, opposite is true for La Nina. Therefore it is the distribution of heat that oscillations control, not the amount of heat entering or leaving Earth. Same is true for the PDO and AMO. CO2, however, is a greenhouse gas which is proven to retain more heat in Earth's system at greater concentrations.
"The El Nino Southern Oscillation,cannot explain an overall buildup of global ocean heat..This points to an energy imbalance responsible for long term trend"...see the Andriod Wjdget " Skeptical Science. CSIRO WWF MET Bureaus & many other professional scientific groups see the huge for-seeable risks in ignoring the vast evidence from man significantly contributing to global warming
this is misleading. carbon doxide can trap heat from the surface. dr roy specer is changing his toon now. C02 is not 44 percent its the main problem. just another defender fror the oil robber barons.
that is a holey misleading video. i would be intrigued to see who the people behind the production of the video was. because it is of scientific consensus that the rises in CO2 are directly linked to global average temperatures. This is just yet another justification for a capitalist economy to keep polluting the environment as 'co2 has a small effect of global temperatures' that statement is rubbish. i encourage anyone to challenge me, i am a 3rd year student studying global climate..
I appreciate your concern James, but you have been seriously mislead. There has never been a consensus among scientists about CO2-caused warming. The last few years have seen research that pretty much decimates the man-caused theory and though no recent poll has been taken, it is likely the majority of scientists now believe warming is natural. We have no connection to any industry.
@mscoffman Today, the fact that human activity, through transport, industry, etc. adds (and has added) carbon (e.g. in the form of CO2) to the Earth’s atmosphere is undeniable. On the other hand, meteorological measurements slightly before, during and after the twentieth century show a mean surface temperature increase of around 0.6°C. The two facts are correlated.
You should take a look at my video on the Oceans & Climate Change.
@mscoffman Bullshit. Ever heard of the IPCC? Get a fucking clue. Also, oscillations effect the distribution of heat throughout Earth's system, they do not effect the total amount of heat in Earth's system. When we have an El Nino its warm in the epac, and cold in the wpac, opposite is true for La Nina. Therefore it is the distribution of heat that oscillations control. Same is true for the PDO. CO2 is greenhouse gas which does retain more heat in Earth's system at greater concentrations. dumbass
@jamesgee1 Capitalism?? Excuse me?! Try the many power hungry governments around the world using false and misleading science to further oppressive taxes and measures! There is not a concensus whatsoever. Scientists receive government funding to further their cause. Even if greenhouse gases caused global warming why is it that the government hides the fact that over 99% of greenhouse gases is water vapor from our oceans? Why, because they can't TAX the ocean!!
@jamesgee1 What is misleading is what is you and others are saying! In reaction of what they are!! We are facing a new change, not the end of World, but heavy loss of life!! Not to be disrespectful of you, cleaner is the better, but not garanties our survival! But as a clear an normal human, see the same cycle, coming again. In lesser and more heavy cycles. What are we looking for? Our survival and species, or our Planet? ???? Both would be great, but not probable!
@jamesgee1 please give evidence for your scientific consensus. Any papers/surveys supporting it have been thoroughly debunked. I am happy to present rebuttal.
@jamesgee1 Concensus means nothing to a scientist and everything to a politician. Ever considered taking up politics because you certainly know nothing of science. There is no scientific proof to link co2 with a warming Planet. co2 is a mere product of warming caused by Solar cycles. Atmospheric co2 enrichment benefits all life on the Planet. Presently the Pacific is cooling, the Atlantic is cooling , every level of the atmosphere is cooling and volcanic activity is increasing.
Oscillations effect the distribution of heat throughout Earth's system, they do not effect the total amount of heat in Earth's system. When we have an El Nino its warm in the epac, and cold in the wpac, opposite is true for La Nina. Therefore it is the distribution of heat that oscillations control, not the amount of heat entering or leaving Earth. Same is true for the PDO and AMO. CO2, however, is a greenhouse gas which is proven to retain more heat in Earth's system at greater concentrations.
SDman94 1 month ago
"The El Nino Southern Oscillation,cannot explain an overall buildup of global ocean heat..This points to an energy imbalance responsible for long term trend"...see the Andriod Wjdget " Skeptical Science. CSIRO WWF MET Bureaus & many other professional scientific groups see the huge for-seeable risks in ignoring the vast evidence from man significantly contributing to global warming
dmlt12 5 months ago
Co2 does not even warrant a mention. The cloud mystery on youtube fits well with this video.
david222444 8 months ago
this is misleading. carbon doxide can trap heat from the surface. dr roy specer is changing his toon now. C02 is not 44 percent its the main problem. just another defender fror the oil robber barons.
ash4432 1 year ago
@ash4432 CO2 does not trap heat.
LucifersDisciple6 4 months ago
@LucifersDisciple6 yes it does retard.
SDman94 1 month ago
@SDman94 Hahaha, I am not a retard useless eater.
LucifersDisciple6 1 month ago
this is misleading and there are tons of evidence that show C02 can trap heat. nice try its small. RIGGHHTT.
ash4432 1 year ago
check out my video, i think it might be informative
rudidas89 1 year ago
that is a holey misleading video. i would be intrigued to see who the people behind the production of the video was. because it is of scientific consensus that the rises in CO2 are directly linked to global average temperatures. This is just yet another justification for a capitalist economy to keep polluting the environment as 'co2 has a small effect of global temperatures' that statement is rubbish. i encourage anyone to challenge me, i am a 3rd year student studying global climate..
James
jamesgee1 1 year ago
@jamesgee1
I appreciate your concern James, but you have been seriously mislead. There has never been a consensus among scientists about CO2-caused warming. The last few years have seen research that pretty much decimates the man-caused theory and though no recent poll has been taken, it is likely the majority of scientists now believe warming is natural. We have no connection to any industry.
mscoffman 1 year ago
@mscoffman Today, the fact that human activity, through transport, industry, etc. adds (and has added) carbon (e.g. in the form of CO2) to the Earth’s atmosphere is undeniable. On the other hand, meteorological measurements slightly before, during and after the twentieth century show a mean surface temperature increase of around 0.6°C. The two facts are correlated.
You should take a look at my video on the Oceans & Climate Change.
rudidas89 1 year ago
@mscoffman whatevers happening doesnt help we're exascerbating it with greenhouse effect, ocean acidifaction/eutriphication
isawanangel2 1 year ago
@mscoffman Bullshit. Ever heard of the IPCC? Get a fucking clue. Also, oscillations effect the distribution of heat throughout Earth's system, they do not effect the total amount of heat in Earth's system. When we have an El Nino its warm in the epac, and cold in the wpac, opposite is true for La Nina. Therefore it is the distribution of heat that oscillations control. Same is true for the PDO. CO2 is greenhouse gas which does retain more heat in Earth's system at greater concentrations. dumbass
SDman94 1 month ago
@jamesgee1 Capitalism?? Excuse me?! Try the many power hungry governments around the world using false and misleading science to further oppressive taxes and measures! There is not a concensus whatsoever. Scientists receive government funding to further their cause. Even if greenhouse gases caused global warming why is it that the government hides the fact that over 99% of greenhouse gases is water vapor from our oceans? Why, because they can't TAX the ocean!!
socalsal627 1 year ago
mjcuracao 1 year ago
@jamesgee1 please give evidence for your scientific consensus. Any papers/surveys supporting it have been thoroughly debunked. I am happy to present rebuttal.
SirTorment 1 year ago
@jamesgee1 Concensus means nothing to a scientist and everything to a politician. Ever considered taking up politics because you certainly know nothing of science. There is no scientific proof to link co2 with a warming Planet. co2 is a mere product of warming caused by Solar cycles. Atmospheric co2 enrichment benefits all life on the Planet. Presently the Pacific is cooling, the Atlantic is cooling , every level of the atmosphere is cooling and volcanic activity is increasing.
david222444 1 month ago
Thanks for the video
climatenews 1 year ago
Finally some real science on this subject, thank you very much!
NeoGen89 2 years ago
@NeoGen89 you should also take a look at my vid
rudidas89 1 year ago
Excellent!! More please!!
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
@TheTempestSpark look up richard s lindzen, MIT meteorologist, Shosiro Minobe, & Dr. Don J Easterbrook
justanothersheeple 1 year ago