Added: 4 years ago
From: oneilc818
Views: 17,706
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Even know I'm English Britain was small so we needed America.

  • When Britain and the United States are on a team nothing can win except god maybe.lol

  • thanks for uploading!

  • Irish Nazi supporters....the IRA and Irish Republicanism was very supportive of the Nazis. The IRA tried several times to establish Nazi links so that any invasion of Britain would be supported by the IRA as allies of the Nazis. In turn for their loyalty to Hitler, the Nazis would unite Ireland and set up an IRA/Irish Republican government who would allow Nazi soldiers to be based there and take their orders from Berlin.

    Smart move...but it just shows what the IRA are really like.

  • Why can't allies just be allies? There always has to be that group of people who conjure up wild accusations against others. It's annoying.

  • A soldier died in the field of battle and came up to the gates of heaven, where he met God. He said to God," Lord, I know I did many things i ain't proud of, and many more that you won't approve of, so if you send me to hell, I won't argue." God stood there for a moment, and then turned to the gatekeeper of heaven. "Let him in", he said.? The gatekeeper, confused, asked why. God looked down at the soldier and said," This man just came from hell."

    -By VerifyJanLuda

  • Without U.S supplies to Russia, They would not have won the key battles that turned the eastern front Moscow,Stalingrad,Kursk(The U.S and U.K helped in all the battles with supplies resources tanks,planes etc etc.) And without U.S supplies to Britain 1940 the could have been invaded and brought the war to British soil.

  • U.S.A In World War 2, Resources and supplies were everything BUT There Military came into the war when the Axis were losing on both sides! In the West the British had defeated the Luftwaffe and stopped the battle of britain 1940, And then at battle of Al Alamein 1942 British Forces defeated the German,Italians and humiliated Rommels counter attacks with the Axis on full rethreat, In the East the Axis had been defeated Moscow,1941-2 Stalingrad 1943, Kursk,1943. U.S resources ere vital.

  • the americans were the biggest force in the west but mainly fought second class german soldiers while the russians took the bulk of the german fighting machine. the russians just sent waves after waves of soldier till they eventually overwhelmed the enemy. hence their casualties. the RAF defeated the German air force. the Americans marines took on most of the fighting in the Pacific. even after all of this i think the Germans had the best military. italians were dumb back than. Ethiopia wtf?

  • all we needed americans for was their money

  • Very interesting reels, thanks for uploading!

  • interseting but these are always shown from the American perspective, but please remember Britain stood alone against Nazi Germany for 2 years.

  • @byakuganmoosharingan we gave you military aid and the supplies necessary to defend yourselves from nazi germany for 2 years. A lot of brits were thankful that we got involved in ww2, because they needed vital supplies.

  • @brb941 Yes a lot of Brits were grateful that you got involved and there were none braver than those pilots who flew in the Eagle squadron. The only thing that you got wrong was that America did not give us anything we had to pay for all the supplies we received, and we did not in fact finish paying for them until the 1980's. The fact still remains that Britain stood alone against the Nazis for 2 years not counting supplies from the Americans, until the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour in Dec 41

  • @byakuganmoosharingan i agree it, was the lend lease agreement that supplied the brits with some necessary raw materials ammo etc., etc.

  • Please return to your dirty country and stop flaming my videos with your gibberish.

  • You with began the dust wipe and look around. There are only 2 countries is Russia and USA and other countries only are pawns in large party. And soon the upshot of this game will come very soon. I do not think that it to please you...))

  • @oneilc818 Ukrainian nazi loving filth LoelSkam

  • @LoelSkam ok, one you are a complete jackass who lives in a eastern european socalist, shithole, whore of a country and you have no right to say that the US is sinfull or will answer to god.

  • @SPQRsamurai117 you daun )) if you did not notice, eastern Europe had never submitted not a single conqueror, and your virgin ambitions of even not godyaca to wipe up my back) suck member as got used

  • you can't have fortified bunkers like this,air borne troops with medium weaponry can easily land and attack you from behind your lines,much respect to Erwin Rommel the best tank commander period but i don't know what he was thinking when he made this atlantic wall

  • 100% agree with you. He build a sort of "WWI defensive position". The Allied weaponry of the time surpassed the Atlantic Wall's defensive capabilities.

  • The Atlantic fortifications were build or already in a process of building long before Rommel arrived. HE also knew, that the fortifications are going to fail.

  • Most likely. Rommel never liked Hitler, or much of his regime. Rommel (simply put) liked to play the game of war, and was part of the plot to murder Hitler. When he found out he was outraged, but because of the respect he had for Rommel, Hitler let him poison himself, rather than stand trial, embarrass his family, and be executed.

  • @gnational87 actually i think you will find Heinz Guderian commander of the (i think) 8th ss panzer group was the best tank commander.

  • the americans DID play a substansial role in the second world war, but britain were the deciding force, same goes for the first world war

  • @quietlyred69 What about Japan? If we decided not to attack them, then the world would have to deal with a whole new problem. Plus britiain received crucial supplies from the US. It was a joint victory, the us and britian deserve the same credit. It's like saying "we won the war after we received almost all our supplies from another country".

  • @brb941 GB conribution in ww2 was 25%

  • @jrobertsoneff Then what was the Soviet contribution?????

  • @jrobertsoneff You are a muppett, and worse still one that has no knowledge of history. You really need to see a proctologist coz you are so full of s++t

  • @quietlyred69 Britain wouldn't go near europe in ww2 without the yanks .In ww1 the germans asked for an armistice only after the yanks arrived in large numbers.

  • @jrobertsoneff as i have already said you are an ignorant muppett

  • The americans did play a huge role in winning the war. but if britain didnt win the battle of britain then the world would be a very darker place to live today.

  • if britain did lose then the french would be there to hel---oh wait! They surrendered, and the americans had to help them out! Oh well!

  • The only reason why we won the war was cause the americans strucked when the germans were weak. The Brits were getting their behinds whooped by the Germans and so were the Russians. Pfft, the Americans would have gotten their behinds handed to them if they bordered Germany when the war first started.

  • yes

  • Yeah, but the key to winning is planning. Strike the enemy when their weak. All's fair in love and war. Mostly.

  • YOur almost their apart from the bit about us getting whooped.

    Aside from Rommel(Greatest General of the 20th Century IMO) attacking our postions and driving us back to the Alamein line we were usually winning the desert War.

  • true, but like vida said; when you strike when youre enemy is weak you win

  • The Russians had turned it around and were pressing Germany well before D-day on June 6, 1944. And it was the Russians who actually took Berlin.

  • It was decided that the Russians would take Berlin, if Russians are so strong why was Berlin split into 4 zones after the war, everyone got a zone each despite the Russians doing the hard work.

  • The only reason the late spring Soviet offensive had such great success is because the Allies opened up a second front. German troops were taken from fighting the Soviets over to prepare for the Normandy invasion.

    The reason that Britain, USA, and France got a piece of Berlin was because of their alliance. Just because someone gets the Capital first does not mean they get everything. [1/2]

  • The agreement about the division of Berlin and the Normandy invasions were discusses by Stalin, FDR, and Churchill in 1943, in Tehran,Iran. During the first of the "Big 3 Conferences" [2/2]

  • @oneilc818 They only opened up a second front because they knew the Russians would have taken the whole of europe .

  • Not to discredit the Russians or anything, but their army wasn't that strong or even that great. For example, The Winter War of 1939-1941: Finland, vastly outnumbered by the USSR in men and weaponry, was able to inflict 80k casualties and the destruction of 2k tanks. Finland had 250k men, 30 tanks; USSR had 1million men, 6k tanks, around 3800 aircraft. Though the war ended up with a treaty meagerly favoring USSR, it showed Hitler their incompetence in military at the time.

    Oneil is correct.

  • yes but we still couldnt have done it without them the germans would have crushed us otherwise

  • @Spanky00Cheeks without wanting to sound like a smartarse the Russians took Berlin because it was agreed at Yalta that they should get the honours there

  • @Spanky00Cheeks But without US and britain on the other fronts it would have been a fair war and Germany would have owned em.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more