Too slow. a Hurst Olds was faster all around, and out handled it. Out broke it too. Shelby needs to get out of the performance market. He lost his touch.
Shelby never built the 500. He was only involved in development of the 350. I'm no blue oval fan, but FoMoCo was the only one that had anything to do with this car.
Ha! Old cars like this crate would have an epic ail in an accident against ANY modern car. Look for the 59 Chevy Impala vs 09 Chevy Impala crash test on youtube. And just about any European car from 1968 would leave this US built hulk for dead in the twisties-be in a Jag E Type or heck, even a VW Bug had a higher skidpad rating back then.
@sofa67 Check out C&T's test on the 1969 Plymouth GTX 440. That car is big, weighs like 3,700 pounds, but it handles VERY well. You see, General Motors and Ford were behind mopar (Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth) in those days in terms of suspensions, chassis, ignitions, valvetrains, the list goes on...mopar was out in front until the mid 70's. Also, some guy rear-ended my Plymouth in his "modern" car and you know what happened? His car became an accordion, my car didn't even have a dent. :)
@sofa67 Kiddo, I have the E-type you're talking about sitting right outside. It has been in the family since it was brand new. There's always been a pony or muscle-car somewhere in the garage beside it, mostly Mopars. The E-type NEVER EVER have stood a chance in performance or reliability compared to the american cars we have owned. Don't get me wrong, I love it for what it is - but you probably should do as I always have done - get some FACTS, try things yourself, before you start preaching.
@sofa67 i dont see a vw gti or a mini cooper s running mid 13s STOCK,nothing from europe could run with this in 1968...I also dont see a cooper fetching $300,000 @ auction like these will+these had 450+bhp stock..they were rated at 300 for insurance pourposes,they werent called King of the Road for nothing,btw the new 2012 gt500 will be around 800+ horse from the factory,& the new 2012 boss 302 mustang will run mid to high 11s stock with 440hp from the factory..though that time is with slicks
@sofa67 Now why would you compare a 21st century car vs one made in 1968? You do realize that back in the old days this car Was King of The Road, The standards were lower back then, as you can see they do 0-40 tests. And fall to pieces? honestly? If one of your european VW or what ever were to get into an accident with this car it would be the european one that falls to pieces. Not to mention this car doesnt sound like some golf cart on steroids eithier, kinda like your shitty european cars fag
You are comparing 2011 Euro technology to American 1967? Even 45 years old, this car would resell for 3 to 5 times the resell price of either of those cars. Its called a "classic". Instead, how about comparing those two cars to the 2011 Shelby GT500? They'd get killed.
Don't get me wrong I abosultley love this test(it's a great big window into the past) but, if you were to call the GT500KR a "great handling car" now, it would instantly land your ass in prison perjury.
I love how they look at every little detail even question the the location of the extractor louvers location which is right over the plug wires.
For it's the KR was close to perfection: it was 100% pure badassery and yet somehow the car had a safe dose(for 68 detriot anyways) of refinement.
@harddrivin1le Here's a guy who apparently went to all the vintage road test videos just to leave negative comments.
and I can promise you the 2001 V6 is NOT faster than this. neither is your little VW GTI. Front-wheel drive is for people who don't know what they're doing.
@harddrivin1le Tell that to the speed limiter on that V6. When your car shuts down on you in the middle of the road and this one leaves your ass in the dust, then we talk.
@zombiesarebad67 if i had one of the 68 KR's I could sell it (though i would never sell it if i got my hands on one lol) i could buy a ton of new v6s lol these things are fetching 300k
I own a 68 GT 390 hi-po mustang, and they are great cars, but very little room inside, and the stock brakes and tires are pathetic. I guess in the day they just didnt know any better. Ford made alot of mistakes with the mustangs back in the day. My car was very undercarbed, heads were too small, brakes etc...But i paid 200 bucks for it in 1984 and it's now worth 50,000. But dodge and chevy were just head and shoulders above ford in the muscle car dept. Fords looked good however.
@barmtrail I've gotta give you the "very little room inside" thing. Every time I climb into a first-gen Mustang, I wonder if they were being marketed to leprechauns back in the sixties.
But even a Mopar guy like me is more than willing to admit that they sure did look good.
@FlintIronstag2008 You will love this story...My best friends father goes lookin for a car one saturday in Pomona, ca. where we lived. He promises his wife it will be a fuel efficent car. This was 1980. We are all sitting in the front yard waiting for the, "new" car to come down the street. Well he bought a car alright, but it was a 69 orange with black hood super bee!! 440 six pack-4 speed hurst-4/88 gears 3 miles to the gallon, and once owned by Dick Landy! The wife was pissed!!
@FlintIronstag2008 Bill drove that car for about 10 years until it just got worn out. My friend still has the original reg. and all the dick landy stickers that were in the glove box. Do you know of any dick landy super bee that was in So California at the time mentioned? Do you know if this was one of his personal cars? His father just sold the car to the junk yard which most people did back her in the day. Thats how i got my 68 GTstang for 200 bucks.
@barmtrail I don't know the history of any of his personal cars, but that is a cool story.
I just caught the tail end (mid-80's of the time when a dumb kid (me) could go and buy a car that would be a highlight at Barris-Jackson now. Sigh.
I sold my '67 GTX back to the guy I bought it from. He had left the Corps, and called me a couple of years later asking if I still had it. I did, and I had just crashed my racebike hard and needed money. Sigh.
When I sold my GTX, I just thought I would pick up another musclecar as soon as I saved a bit. Even a young, dumb Lcpl could afford what is now an expensive trailer queen.
I even passed on a 1971 Hemi Charger for $10k once. Very clean, and only lightly modified. I could have (barely) afforded it, but would have needed to borrow some money to pull the trigger, so I waited. Aargh.
Every time I see one of these videos. It makes me sick when they treat these cars the way they do, (I know it is a review). I can not understand the braking test--they ALWAYS lock them up, stupid.
They could usually get shorter times locking up the rears because the fronts would still work better that way. Just read a vintage test where they mentioned that if they didn't lock the brakes it took longer to stop.
I had a '69 Mustang with disk brakes in front. The disk brakes were big and effective, but the proportioning between the front and rear was always bad.
You could disconnect the rear and not really notice.
@laford1986 That's because they didn't have ABS and when people panic before a potential accident, they tend to just slam the brakes like in the test.
Makes you wonder where that car is today, and if it even exists.
freespace2dotcom 1 month ago
Ahh! The good ole days when brakes where an option LOL!
thecruisingcars 1 month ago
..the slightest jerk will lock it up tight!....Jerks shouldn't drive this car lol!
thecruisingcars 1 month ago
HEY! LOOK MA!! It's real louvers!!!
james29472 2 months ago in playlist More videos from MaccaIsntDead
3:50 for happy time
Drbrilliant92 3 months ago
Love how everyone picks at things that does not matter like the rims. Who cares Id love to have a Shelby I would not sell it for the world
TheNorthernSoulKing 3 months ago
Good vid. I love the arguments, cursing and namecalling when the experts comment and fight about what brand is better. What a bunch of morons.
2253glen 4 months ago
Too slow. a Hurst Olds was faster all around, and out handled it. Out broke it too. Shelby needs to get out of the performance market. He lost his touch.
conrynsilverleaf65 5 months ago
@conrynsilverleaf65
Shelby never built the 500. He was only involved in development of the 350. I'm no blue oval fan, but FoMoCo was the only one that had anything to do with this car.
nestromo83 5 months ago in playlist More videos from MaccaIsntDead
Good video but at the beginning the rims are way wrong look it up I'm right!
KRKATANAKID 5 months ago
I would get one, but I'm poor. :(
RedWolf3487 6 months ago
5:23
jammer96 8 months ago
Ha! Old cars like this crate would have an epic ail in an accident against ANY modern car. Look for the 59 Chevy Impala vs 09 Chevy Impala crash test on youtube. And just about any European car from 1968 would leave this US built hulk for dead in the twisties-be in a Jag E Type or heck, even a VW Bug had a higher skidpad rating back then.
sofa67 9 months ago
@sofa67 i've seen that video. i love the rust falling off the 59. apparently they picked one that looked great but was rusted to hell underneath.
CamaroAmx 8 months ago
@sofa67 you're an idiot. name any current model European car and i will name and american car that outperforms it for less money. prick.
moronsgetout 7 months ago
@sofa67 Check out C&T's test on the 1969 Plymouth GTX 440. That car is big, weighs like 3,700 pounds, but it handles VERY well. You see, General Motors and Ford were behind mopar (Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth) in those days in terms of suspensions, chassis, ignitions, valvetrains, the list goes on...mopar was out in front until the mid 70's. Also, some guy rear-ended my Plymouth in his "modern" car and you know what happened? His car became an accordion, my car didn't even have a dent. :)
DeAdiSSu3 6 months ago
@sofa67 Kiddo, I have the E-type you're talking about sitting right outside. It has been in the family since it was brand new. There's always been a pony or muscle-car somewhere in the garage beside it, mostly Mopars. The E-type NEVER EVER have stood a chance in performance or reliability compared to the american cars we have owned. Don't get me wrong, I love it for what it is - but you probably should do as I always have done - get some FACTS, try things yourself, before you start preaching.
MoskvaMorten 6 months ago
Ha! A Mini Cooper S or VW GTI will run with this clunker easily, get triple the gas mileage, actually corner, and not fall to pieces. American CRAP
sofa67 9 months ago
Comment removed
bad65stang 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sofa67 i dont see a vw gti or a mini cooper s running mid 13s STOCK,nothing from europe could run with this in 1968...I also dont see a cooper fetching $300,000 @ auction like these will+these had 450+bhp stock..they were rated at 300 for insurance pourposes,they werent called King of the Road for nothing,btw the new 2012 gt500 will be around 800+ horse from the factory,& the new 2012 boss 302 mustang will run mid to high 11s stock with 440hp from the factory..though that time is with slicks
bad65stang 9 months ago
@sofa67 Now why would you compare a 21st century car vs one made in 1968? You do realize that back in the old days this car Was King of The Road, The standards were lower back then, as you can see they do 0-40 tests. And fall to pieces? honestly? If one of your european VW or what ever were to get into an accident with this car it would be the european one that falls to pieces. Not to mention this car doesnt sound like some golf cart on steroids eithier, kinda like your shitty european cars fag
IIAIRBORNEII89 9 months ago
@sofa67
You are comparing 2011 Euro technology to American 1967? Even 45 years old, this car would resell for 3 to 5 times the resell price of either of those cars. Its called a "classic". Instead, how about comparing those two cars to the 2011 Shelby GT500? They'd get killed.
428CJ70 8 months ago in playlist Cars
old top gear us XD
nah ist actually car and track
yorrickwi 9 months ago
Don't get me wrong I abosultley love this test(it's a great big window into the past) but, if you were to call the GT500KR a "great handling car" now, it would instantly land your ass in prison perjury.
I love how they look at every little detail even question the the location of the extractor louvers location which is right over the plug wires.
For it's the KR was close to perfection: it was 100% pure badassery and yet somehow the car had a safe dose(for 68 detriot anyways) of refinement.
Dwnshifter 9 months ago
Another car I used to drool over when I was young.
kolbpilot 10 months ago
1968 dodge charger with the 426ci HEMI and for me FUCK ford DODGE IS KING of THE ROAD sorry ford lovers but that me
mowat440 10 months ago
You're right.
The 2001 V6 Mustang wasn't as fast as this car, but the 2011 is.
They're running 13.7 second quarter miles at 102+ MPH.
And a new 2011 5.0 liter GT would roast both of them.
harddrivin1le 11 months ago
@harddrivin1le Obviously a new 5.0 would tear both of them apart. But I doubt the new v6 is running a high-13 1/4 mile
iloveduchess 11 months ago
LOL
The new 2011 V6 Mustang is faster than this Shelby AND it gets 31 MPG highway.
harddrivin1le 11 months ago
@harddrivin1le Here's a guy who apparently went to all the vintage road test videos just to leave negative comments.
and I can promise you the 2001 V6 is NOT faster than this. neither is your little VW GTI. Front-wheel drive is for people who don't know what they're doing.
iloveduchess 11 months ago
@harddrivin1le Tell that to the speed limiter on that V6. When your car shuts down on you in the middle of the road and this one leaves your ass in the dust, then we talk.
slayer19966 10 months ago
@harddrivin1le true, but...
1. all these old road tests were done on bias-ply tires. If you've ever driven anything with them, you know what a huge handicap that is.
2. very few old cars are stock nowadays. They have more aftermarket support than any other type of car and thus have the most tuning potential.
p.s. would you rather have a new v6 one, though?
zombiesarebad67 10 months ago
@zombiesarebad67 if i had one of the 68 KR's I could sell it (though i would never sell it if i got my hands on one lol) i could buy a ton of new v6s lol these things are fetching 300k
bad65stang 9 months ago
holy shit thats a nice car
Rustyrunaway 11 months ago
Very nice video, thanks for sharing.
CarVideoSpot 11 months ago
yaaay... back when car reviews were exactly that; car reviews.
halflife103 1 year ago
America now is how such a dream car? in Hungary or
enyemvagy 1 year ago
nah ,én ilyenkor szoktam becsinálni!!!!
ez egy álom autó!!!
enyemvagy 1 year ago
"Hey....it's happy time!" Bud was soooo cool!!
redtorino 1 year ago
man this guy makes even the seat belts sound like fun.
Enigmalast 1 year ago
Very few cars could deal with a 428CJ powered Mustang. More than a few Street Hemis got smoked.
DONDIVA1969 1 year ago
Ha, the right brake light is already burnt out @ 4:51.
Cash2112 1 year ago
at 3:22 anyone else see the fly walking across the part in front of the center console?
Corkoth55 1 year ago
@Corkoth55 dude how did you see that? i would have never noticed it!
killjoy455 1 year ago
@killjoy455 haha good eye i suppose xD nowadays they'd be all over this and have to re shoot the commercial!
Corkoth55 1 year ago
"The reverse spin"
They're hiding screwing around and having fun by making it a test.
thegreatcarraway 1 year ago
I own a 68 GT 390 hi-po mustang, and they are great cars, but very little room inside, and the stock brakes and tires are pathetic. I guess in the day they just didnt know any better. Ford made alot of mistakes with the mustangs back in the day. My car was very undercarbed, heads were too small, brakes etc...But i paid 200 bucks for it in 1984 and it's now worth 50,000. But dodge and chevy were just head and shoulders above ford in the muscle car dept. Fords looked good however.
barmtrail 1 year ago
@barmtrail I've gotta give you the "very little room inside" thing. Every time I climb into a first-gen Mustang, I wonder if they were being marketed to leprechauns back in the sixties.
But even a Mopar guy like me is more than willing to admit that they sure did look good.
FlintIronstag2008 1 year ago
@FlintIronstag2008 You will love this story...My best friends father goes lookin for a car one saturday in Pomona, ca. where we lived. He promises his wife it will be a fuel efficent car. This was 1980. We are all sitting in the front yard waiting for the, "new" car to come down the street. Well he bought a car alright, but it was a 69 orange with black hood super bee!! 440 six pack-4 speed hurst-4/88 gears 3 miles to the gallon, and once owned by Dick Landy! The wife was pissed!!
barmtrail 1 year ago
@FlintIronstag2008 Bill drove that car for about 10 years until it just got worn out. My friend still has the original reg. and all the dick landy stickers that were in the glove box. Do you know of any dick landy super bee that was in So California at the time mentioned? Do you know if this was one of his personal cars? His father just sold the car to the junk yard which most people did back her in the day. Thats how i got my 68 GTstang for 200 bucks.
barmtrail 1 year ago
@barmtrail I don't know the history of any of his personal cars, but that is a cool story.
I just caught the tail end (mid-80's of the time when a dumb kid (me) could go and buy a car that would be a highlight at Barris-Jackson now. Sigh.
I sold my '67 GTX back to the guy I bought it from. He had left the Corps, and called me a couple of years later asking if I still had it. I did, and I had just crashed my racebike hard and needed money. Sigh.
Just before the musclecar market went nuts.
FlintIronstag2008 1 year ago
@barmtrail (Stupid 500 character limit)
When I sold my GTX, I just thought I would pick up another musclecar as soon as I saved a bit. Even a young, dumb Lcpl could afford what is now an expensive trailer queen.
I even passed on a 1971 Hemi Charger for $10k once. Very clean, and only lightly modified. I could have (barely) afforded it, but would have needed to borrow some money to pull the trigger, so I waited. Aargh.
FlintIronstag2008 1 year ago
No videos of the 1967 Shelby GT500KR :(
MrChannelPromo 1 year ago
@MrChannelPromo No such thing as a '67 GT500KR, the KR was a mid year introduction of the 428 Cobra Jet motor.
tuffguy428 1 year ago
Mercury Cougar Interior?! ;-)
jensenbell 1 year ago
0-60 in 6.2 seconds!! danm thats fast nowadays
idontlikecops1 1 year ago
Badass muscle car. 8mpg on a good day. Still looks fun.
jammer96 1 year ago
this car was thirsty...all the time
TheWraithMan666 1 year ago
I don´t care about nothing, this is the best Muscle Car ever; of course, the King of Road !
r9alexito 1 year ago
Strange about the entire side brake light being out, it has 3 or so globes in it!
crayman31 1 year ago
I think because of the fact that these go for $100,000 + on barrett jackson, its definetly the king of the road.
herbienbrian 1 year ago
Hahaha, "bucket seats"; they're as flat as Keira Knightley's stomach! Great car, nevertheless..
wiebehoukes 1 year ago
Why would a brand new car have a brake light out?
Mr400fe 1 year ago
@Mr400fe It's a Ford, what do you expect?!!
landyachtfan79 1 year ago
@Mr400fe i've seen alot of brand new cars today that have a headlight out. some things don't change.
CamaroAmx 8 months ago
Fantastic, thanks for posting!
Husong812 1 year ago
Did he say hotchkis suspension?
Can't be the same mob can it?
Samsgarden 1 year ago
@Samsgarden yes
Mr400fe 1 year ago
it lost a tail light bulb in the brake test!
StoneCold75 1 year ago
love the real air scoops, not like the ones cars have now
limpkit2011 1 year ago
Not under 14 sec in the 1/4...think if they actually had tires back then that were worth a damn
F14CRAZY 1 year ago
Comment removed
Aliendear 1 year ago
@Aliendear lead the way!!
proxima777 1 year ago
Anyone know if this particular Shelby is still around?
ozzfest641 1 year ago
I love KR
lycinka 2 years ago
Every time I see one of these videos. It makes me sick when they treat these cars the way they do, (I know it is a review). I can not understand the braking test--they ALWAYS lock them up, stupid.
laford1986 2 years ago
They could usually get shorter times locking up the rears because the fronts would still work better that way. Just read a vintage test where they mentioned that if they didn't lock the brakes it took longer to stop.
mustangcharger 2 years ago
I had a '69 Mustang with disk brakes in front. The disk brakes were big and effective, but the proportioning between the front and rear was always bad.
You could disconnect the rear and not really notice.
charlesvan13 2 years ago
What, a car? Being DRIVEN?! WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT.
wwoorrdd 2 years ago
@laford1986 That's because they didn't have ABS and when people panic before a potential accident, they tend to just slam the brakes like in the test.
xfistsclenchedx 2 years ago
Hey its happy time!
volkscom 2 years ago
Awesome!
BrentAudi 2 years ago