Thank you again so much. I just read Mutant Message down under and am in biology and anthropology right now and have had these same thoughts about our perceptions and living do you have any reading recommendations I would love to learn more about this?
Stopped listening at Einstein. Ultimate snake oil salesman. Care to prove any of his significant theories? He made no serious attempt because he knew they were all bollocks.
For the record I am a devout atheist. I once thought the simplest of things are so incredibly complex that they could not have just happened. Must be a God. But then God must be pretty complex himself so who the **** made him? There must be a Super God. And he must be even more incredibly complex......
Radio waves travel at the speed of light you can measure the speed radio waves travel. So the speed of light's speed can proven. Einstein said that light would bend in a strong gravity field, Edwin Hubble then tested this by pointing a telescope to the sun during and eclipse and took pic of the stars and their light did bend. Nuclear Energy, Einstein came up with the theory on how to do it (yes I do know there were others as well working on it.)
Real proof how much more real proof than physics applied to ever day uses. Like weather Doppler radar that uses the speed of light, same thing with radar speed traps. Where is your proof where is your argument on this. You use a computer which was made using principles in Quantum and Relativity physics. unless you are just trolling!
A theory based on contradictory postulates cannot be proven. It's clearly nonsense. However it's 'relatively' easy to prove false. e.g. google physics semantrium relativity
Nice use of the Lorentz equations. Einstein would burst a blood vessel.
For a different approach google grandunification hypertext Proof_Relativity_Illogical
Good emphasis on circularity of arguments and 'results'. A child with basic understanding of units can see that E=MCC is circular and empty.
It;s obvious that you know more than me on this, but I do know that GUT which you mention yes clarifies contractions in relativity, but remember that relativity corrected mistakes in Newtonian physics. Yet Newtonian physic is still used to understand certain aspect of gravity. Thus so will the same thing happen 1 day with relativity. But that is still no reason to throw out all of relativity since much of it has been applied and still used.
Yeah... I can totally see Obama dying only to raise himself from the dead 3 days later and then giving us all control chips in our hands or head... The Antichrist is loved by the people, check out Obama's approval rating. Everyone will believe that the Antichrist is the reincarnation of Jesus himself. You want a candidate look to the Roth family.
i'm sure the roths are the ones they're the world's mot powerful man right ? that's essential or else it's not the antichrist has to be number one man in the world the antichrist is popular is obama popular ? i read he had 85% rating in Europe obama took his grandfather sexually in poem he wrote see my page for links that same as the antichrist prophecy ? I know it's said he'll be the LAWLESS one is f**king ur grandpa lawless ? Yes sodom-gomorrah
Being a physicist myself I know that the first myth is not a myth at all. Quantum mechanics has been around for 80 years now. But the weirdness of quantum mechanics will not be seen in proteins because they are too large with too many atoms. And a field is not some supernatural entity and should not be compared to a spirit.
of course I always say the mainstream science is just a wishfull science and frankly they are idiots all believing the same thing. why do we need them if they all thinking the same comfortable theories, same as doctors all thinking alike inside the box and no wonder they can not cure anything chronic
It think that you can have a more realistic worldviiew if you have both ends in mind, for example, it's imposible to deny that there is competition, but also there is cooperation in nature and some organism, once they enter a new enviroment, sometimes they become so numerous that they destruct that enviroment...
I think that he has a point, but his worldview is too new age for me. It's seem that quantum mechanics is the excuse to validate any kind of spiritual worldview, even they are not understood.
Horrible science fail. Quantum mechanics = F. Genetics = F. Natural selection = F. Next thing I expect to hear is that the "Great Flood" formed the Grand Canyon in about 5 minutes.
Regarding at least one comment here, there is a materialist bent in physics which tries to deny all immaterial forces. One example is the theory that there are jillions of tiny, as yet undetected gravitons pulling us toward Earth. So instead of telling someone "Don't fall down," it would supposely be more accurate to say, "Don't let the gravitons get you!" haha Don't buy it!
I think the materialist mindset and denial of man's spiritual nature is A if not THE main problem in the world today.
Physics is really mankind's attempt to describe the universe using the language of mathematics. Consider physics nothing more than a set of "quantifications" which are consistent enough to offer reliable predictive value to us. Since we can only quantify that which is material, observable, and determinable, physics is limited to that which is material.
Physics says nothing about purpose or love, but it the ONLY accurate way to describe gravity (unless you know another). So why bash physics??
Again, I find it hard to believe you know much about modern physics or the true nature of reality concerning which physics gives only a hint. Of course, physicists can only study measurable phenomena, but these point us towards a higher reality than that which we experience with our five senses. Take for instance string (M) theory, holographic field, akashic field theory, etc.
Again, you appeal to how smart you are without demonstrating it. You're the one personalizing it in this way.
You can't separate energy and matter into two 'realms' as you imply with,
"Your statement implies that physics does not support the existence of an immaterial realm."
The 'material' matter and 'immaterial' energy are interchangeable, and do not exist on two separate 'planes.' Everything within our universe exists within our universe, energy, matter, and whatever else there may be.
It's possible that there are other universes, and things may travel between them...
When communicating with materialists, I seek to convince them that an "immaterial realm" exists. This realm is not separate from the material world in an absolute sense, but only in terms of human perception. There are things that we can experience with our five senses, and other "things" that we cannot directly sense.
I think there is only one realm, i.e., energy. Scientists have found that "matter" actually consists of wave forms. Matter is a form of energy.
myth #1: Newtonian physics explains our world (Invisible forces govern the physical world. Spirit and field use the same definition.)
myth #2: Genes control life (You can be a master if you change perceptions.)
myth #3: Survival of the fittest. (Life is based on co-operation not competition.)
myth #4: Life evolved as a random process. (We are an extension of the environment. Every time a creature is introduced into an eco system, it is created for a purpose.)
My friend I believe what he is saying is basic understanding of reality as it is... he is saying that the truth is that reality is in the mind.. when you see a wall you might see an obstacle.. others may see protection.. or a good challenge.. or an ugly rock wall.. that is a basic example but i hope you know what I mean.. a wall is just a small example.. so here you perceive me as a friendly brother, an arrogant know it all or a crack pot XD but that is all your chosen perception :)
He seems to feel the need to take things to extremes to explain his point. While it is true that your lifestyle can change your genes (google epigenetics), it does not seem to be true that genes have no bearing on health.
The whole victim thing speaks to the issue of people who are fearful because their whole family got a particular disease that is 'genetic'... he would refute this & I think that there is a point where he may be right, in practice, not in theory.
I know I'll be down-voted for saying this, but as a physics major and lifelong Quantum Physics enthusiast I had to say it:
NOTHING in quantum physics is actually "immaterial" or truly "invisible"; Quantum physics merely operates at a smaller level than we are currently able to see fully (though modern tools allow us to see more and more and of it every day).
Quantum physics has been used by laypersons to justify the "immaterial" and "metaphysical" simply because they don't fully grasp it. :(
I suspect you're just an atheist who wants to reject all religious and metaphysical beliefs. "Physical" refers to matter, and "metaphysical" refers to the field, which is every bit as real as matter. While this does not justify every metaphysical belief, it certainly refutes the materialistic worldview that you want to cling to like some kind of teddy bear. Grow up!
I believe with every fiber of my being that this universe and every individual in it was created with love and purpose, the secrets of which are to be discovered within ourselves. Nothing you've said "refutes" my worldview and I cling to nothing other than an insatiable desire to learn and understand my world and the beautiful opportunity we call "life".
Sorry. To avoid any further personal remarks, I will gladly assume you are an expert on physics. Even so, I can hardly imagine a REAL physicist attacking the idea that there can be an "immaterial" realm, as though everything is matter!!!!
FYI, love and purpose are "immaterial" as well as "metaphysical" concepts.
By the way, Blacksun, even the simple quote from Einstein in the video refutes your statement, unless you have something substantial to contribute other than citing your own knowledge and authority which, even if you provided your name and the name of your alma mater, would not contribute anything to the discussion.
Again, your insistent personal attacks are rude and uncalled for. You seemed like a nice person, not sure why you're doing it.
A "field" isn't actually "invisible" since it's just the name we give to what is essentially a group of values; "Fields" are just what we call measurements of a given property present in every point in a given region. Whether or not we measure these values at enormous levels, they are the result of actions that take place at an unimaginably tiny scale.
I never said I was an "expert" or "authority", I'm still just an undergrad! ....though I'm going to guess that I probably know more about physics than you do.
Do you fully grasp it. modern physicist have theories but unifed theories are just as much a theory or perception of mind as anyone elses ideology but in the parts that they cant tie together they try to use math to justify. dont get me wrong physicist have made amzing leaps in our understanding, but i think that reality is bigger than any human has the capacity to fully comprehend.reality, truth andthe higher purpose in our existence cant be understood with science, religion or our feable minds
Mathematics just happens to be the most accurate tool humanity has developed to quantify the observable, physical around us. It "justifies" the timing of the next solar eclipse with a higher degree of accuracy and reliability than any other tool at humanity's disposal.
Unlike other tools we use to discern the truth, the conclusions that math is used to draw are *only* verified by consistent observation; and they may become completely invalidated by just *one* observation.
i agree, yet the observable is only a small fraction of what exist. math has yet to discern the unseen and the true nature of the force that governs all that is observable and that which exist beyond observation. even though math is the most powerful asset at human disposable not all things in existance can be quantified and measured. even though this dilema exist it can not account for, or disprove the existence of that which is beyond the realm of human observation.
Summary: The nonphysical attributes of life (spirit, thoughts, beliefs, attitudes) shape and form a meaningful world and existence which is based in cooperation and ideally an empowered humanity in harmony with the natural world. mmm?
Lipton is one of the people I deeply respect, hes someone I would like to have as my university professor. He liberated himself from conservative, idiotic, arrogant, academic perception, which takes whats written in the books same as religious conservatives would, believing more to a book that was written at least 50 years ago then current empirical evidence.
Bruce Lipton is his name & he's a geneticist, he was cloning human muscle cells as far back as the 1960's
cactusjake49 1 year ago
I agree
Bidil6 1 year ago
Sure sure
Bidil6 1 year ago
At 4:10 HE SAYS the 3rd misperception is survival of the fittest while the screen says MYTH #4
well confuse guy is confused. What can I say?
ExtantFrodo 2 years ago
college... he missed out on that course lol
kristophershaun 2 years ago
I'll explain the evils of Guevarism, which is terrorism, on my page today
ObamasTheBeast 2 years ago
Thank you again so much. I just read Mutant Message down under and am in biology and anthropology right now and have had these same thoughts about our perceptions and living do you have any reading recommendations I would love to learn more about this?
YirtakkiHippie 2 years ago
LetsNotBeL7 2 years ago
Stopped listening at Einstein. Ultimate snake oil salesman. Care to prove any of his significant theories? He made no serious attempt because he knew they were all bollocks.
For the record I am a devout atheist. I once thought the simplest of things are so incredibly complex that they could not have just happened. Must be a God. But then God must be pretty complex himself so who the **** made him? There must be a Super God. And he must be even more incredibly complex......
namsak 2 years ago
Radio waves travel at the speed of light you can measure the speed radio waves travel. So the speed of light's speed can proven. Einstein said that light would bend in a strong gravity field, Edwin Hubble then tested this by pointing a telescope to the sun during and eclipse and took pic of the stars and their light did bend. Nuclear Energy, Einstein came up with the theory on how to do it (yes I do know there were others as well working on it.)
hank1972 2 years ago
In 1917 Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths pointed a camera at some cardboard cut outs. It proved the existence of fairies.
I was talking about a real proof.
namsak 2 years ago
Real proof how much more real proof than physics applied to ever day uses. Like weather Doppler radar that uses the speed of light, same thing with radar speed traps. Where is your proof where is your argument on this. You use a computer which was made using principles in Quantum and Relativity physics. unless you are just trolling!
hank1972 2 years ago
A theory based on contradictory postulates cannot be proven. It's clearly nonsense. However it's 'relatively' easy to prove false. e.g. google physics semantrium relativity
Nice use of the Lorentz equations. Einstein would burst a blood vessel.
For a different approach google grandunification hypertext Proof_Relativity_Illogical
Good emphasis on circularity of arguments and 'results'. A child with basic understanding of units can see that E=MCC is circular and empty.
namsak 2 years ago
It;s obvious that you know more than me on this, but I do know that GUT which you mention yes clarifies contractions in relativity, but remember that relativity corrected mistakes in Newtonian physics. Yet Newtonian physic is still used to understand certain aspect of gravity. Thus so will the same thing happen 1 day with relativity. But that is still no reason to throw out all of relativity since much of it has been applied and still used.
hank1972 2 years ago
The environment was greated by God too and we can't live and produce without it-so go figure!
coccocatchanel 2 years ago
We were created in GODS image not the environment.
HenryWinehard 2 years ago
Matter is a form of energy, quantitatively,
energy equals mass times the speed of light in a vacuum squared. The two aren't two separate entities.
Khronofox 2 years ago
I know nothing about quantum physics, but I find this meaningful.
rbrooks802 2 years ago
Comment removed
rbrooks802 2 years ago
obama's the antichrist
maybe too tough to understand
tough to get ur head around
EndOfTimesProphecy 2 years ago
Yeah... I can totally see Obama dying only to raise himself from the dead 3 days later and then giving us all control chips in our hands or head... The Antichrist is loved by the people, check out Obama's approval rating. Everyone will believe that the Antichrist is the reincarnation of Jesus himself. You want a candidate look to the Roth family.
rabidiga 2 years ago
ObamasTheBeast 2 years ago
seek help please or wear a tin foil hat.
hank1972 2 years ago
thanks for support hank
on election day numbers of the marks of the beast (Antichrist's) drawn for Obama
Birwapa 2 years ago
oh your welcome, and that thing that follows you is just your shadow.
hank1972 2 years ago
no it's me told u the marks of beast are seared on obama's head
he can run he can hide but they'll not get lost
he's branded
no escape
EndOfTimesProphecy 2 years ago
So what they are saying is that something they don't understand is similar to something else they don't understand. Ha.
Baphometr418 2 years ago
Being a physicist myself I know that the first myth is not a myth at all. Quantum mechanics has been around for 80 years now. But the weirdness of quantum mechanics will not be seen in proteins because they are too large with too many atoms. And a field is not some supernatural entity and should not be compared to a spirit.
qbslug 2 years ago
of course I always say the mainstream science is just a wishfull science and frankly they are idiots all believing the same thing. why do we need them if they all thinking the same comfortable theories, same as doctors all thinking alike inside the box and no wonder they can not cure anything chronic
k3456789 2 years ago
It think that you can have a more realistic worldviiew if you have both ends in mind, for example, it's imposible to deny that there is competition, but also there is cooperation in nature and some organism, once they enter a new enviroment, sometimes they become so numerous that they destruct that enviroment...
carlosgeijo 2 years ago
I think that he has a point, but his worldview is too new age for me. It's seem that quantum mechanics is the excuse to validate any kind of spiritual worldview, even they are not understood.
carlosgeijo 2 years ago
Very insightful. This is the age that we approach. Thank you for sharing.
enlytnd 2 years ago
1. Newtonian physics isn't everything, but it sure is a lot more than nothing
2. Genes control a lot of your life, ask a retard
3. Survival of the fittest is not entirely on an individual level, species cooperation within themselves, but not always among other species
4. Only creationists want us to think life evolved randomly, any scientist knows natural selection is a major part of the process
funwjoshnjenn 2 years ago
your an idiot.
mmmkmmmslag 2 years ago
You're an idiot.
There, I fixed it for you.
Protoaxl 2 years ago
Chemtrails behind the horses. Interesting thoughts and I agree with quite a bit.
deskcreative 2 years ago
He's making a lot of big leaps from his base premises, and his base premises are a little off kilter from the get go.
I smell a combination of pseudoscience and mysticism.
XOmniverse 2 years ago 4
@XOmniverse
This guy Bruce Lipton is a geneticist who was cloning human muscle cells back in the 60's
cactusjake49 1 year ago
FYI: The video says "Myth 4: Survival of the fittest" and the audio says "Myth 3".
rflosi 2 years ago
They Dont want us to know God.
Drizzy123 2 years ago
Comment removed
Drizzy123 2 years ago
Horrible science fail. Quantum mechanics = F. Genetics = F. Natural selection = F. Next thing I expect to hear is that the "Great Flood" formed the Grand Canyon in about 5 minutes.
pyrite13 2 years ago
Regarding at least one comment here, there is a materialist bent in physics which tries to deny all immaterial forces. One example is the theory that there are jillions of tiny, as yet undetected gravitons pulling us toward Earth. So instead of telling someone "Don't fall down," it would supposely be more accurate to say, "Don't let the gravitons get you!" haha Don't buy it!
I think the materialist mindset and denial of man's spiritual nature is A if not THE main problem in the world today.
mayartay 2 years ago
Physics is really mankind's attempt to describe the universe using the language of mathematics. Consider physics nothing more than a set of "quantifications" which are consistent enough to offer reliable predictive value to us. Since we can only quantify that which is material, observable, and determinable, physics is limited to that which is material.
Physics says nothing about purpose or love, but it the ONLY accurate way to describe gravity (unless you know another). So why bash physics??
Blacksun1942 2 years ago 3
Again, I find it hard to believe you know much about modern physics or the true nature of reality concerning which physics gives only a hint. Of course, physicists can only study measurable phenomena, but these point us towards a higher reality than that which we experience with our five senses. Take for instance string (M) theory, holographic field, akashic field theory, etc.
Again, you appeal to how smart you are without demonstrating it. You're the one personalizing it in this way.
mayartay 2 years ago
I don't bash physics since it does nothing to disprove either my own metaphysical beliefs, nor yours.
mayartay 2 years ago
By the way, Blacksun, I would like you to explain this statement if you can:
"Quantum physics has been used by laypersons to justify the "immaterial" and "metaphysical" simply because they don't fully grasp it."
Your statement implies that physics does not support the existence of an immaterial realm.
This is patently absurd since energy itself is immaterial. You have shown once again that you know nothing about physics!
mayartay 2 years ago
You can't separate energy and matter into two 'realms' as you imply with,
"Your statement implies that physics does not support the existence of an immaterial realm."
The 'material' matter and 'immaterial' energy are interchangeable, and do not exist on two separate 'planes.' Everything within our universe exists within our universe, energy, matter, and whatever else there may be.
It's possible that there are other universes, and things may travel between them...
ty1824 2 years ago
ty1824,
When communicating with materialists, I seek to convince them that an "immaterial realm" exists. This realm is not separate from the material world in an absolute sense, but only in terms of human perception. There are things that we can experience with our five senses, and other "things" that we cannot directly sense.
I think there is only one realm, i.e., energy. Scientists have found that "matter" actually consists of wave forms. Matter is a form of energy.
mayartay 2 years ago
myth #1: Newtonian physics explains our world (Invisible forces govern the physical world. Spirit and field use the same definition.)
myth #2: Genes control life (You can be a master if you change perceptions.)
myth #3: Survival of the fittest. (Life is based on co-operation not competition.)
myth #4: Life evolved as a random process. (We are an extension of the environment. Every time a creature is introduced into an eco system, it is created for a purpose.)
ThusFarNoFarther 2 years ago
yeah... epigenetics...
peace2U
IChoseTheRedPill 2 years ago
Uh, how do my genes make me a victim? They dont control my life. Sure, they control some factors, but not all.
This vid sounds like it makes the point that our thoughts and perceptions change our genes. Which I dont agree with either.
Did I misunderstand the guy?
skeletonmom 2 years ago
My friend I believe what he is saying is basic understanding of reality as it is... he is saying that the truth is that reality is in the mind.. when you see a wall you might see an obstacle.. others may see protection.. or a good challenge.. or an ugly rock wall.. that is a basic example but i hope you know what I mean.. a wall is just a small example.. so here you perceive me as a friendly brother, an arrogant know it all or a crack pot XD but that is all your chosen perception :)
sloppymantis 2 years ago
Ah, thankyou Grasshoppa'...LOL
skeletonmom 2 years ago
He seems to feel the need to take things to extremes to explain his point. While it is true that your lifestyle can change your genes (google epigenetics), it does not seem to be true that genes have no bearing on health.
The whole victim thing speaks to the issue of people who are fearful because their whole family got a particular disease that is 'genetic'... he would refute this & I think that there is a point where he may be right, in practice, not in theory.
Noz7777 2 years ago
I know I'll be down-voted for saying this, but as a physics major and lifelong Quantum Physics enthusiast I had to say it:
NOTHING in quantum physics is actually "immaterial" or truly "invisible"; Quantum physics merely operates at a smaller level than we are currently able to see fully (though modern tools allow us to see more and more and of it every day).
Quantum physics has been used by laypersons to justify the "immaterial" and "metaphysical" simply because they don't fully grasp it. :(
Blacksun1942 2 years ago 6
upvoted!
Alphonzen 2 years ago
I suspect you're just an atheist who wants to reject all religious and metaphysical beliefs. "Physical" refers to matter, and "metaphysical" refers to the field, which is every bit as real as matter. While this does not justify every metaphysical belief, it certainly refutes the materialistic worldview that you want to cling to like some kind of teddy bear. Grow up!
mayartay 2 years ago
No need to personally attack me. :(
I believe with every fiber of my being that this universe and every individual in it was created with love and purpose, the secrets of which are to be discovered within ourselves. Nothing you've said "refutes" my worldview and I cling to nothing other than an insatiable desire to learn and understand my world and the beautiful opportunity we call "life".
Blacksun1942 2 years ago
Sorry. To avoid any further personal remarks, I will gladly assume you are an expert on physics. Even so, I can hardly imagine a REAL physicist attacking the idea that there can be an "immaterial" realm, as though everything is matter!!!!
FYI, love and purpose are "immaterial" as well as "metaphysical" concepts.
mayartay 2 years ago
By the way, Blacksun, even the simple quote from Einstein in the video refutes your statement, unless you have something substantial to contribute other than citing your own knowledge and authority which, even if you provided your name and the name of your alma mater, would not contribute anything to the discussion.
mayartay 2 years ago
"Quantum physics merely operates at a smaller level than we are currently able to see"
Correction: Fields can operate at pretty enormous levels. But as an amateur physicist, I'm sure you knew that. ;)
mayartay 2 years ago
One more thing... Fields are not "smaller... than we are able to see." They are invisible. Got it?
mayartay 2 years ago
Again, your insistent personal attacks are rude and uncalled for. You seemed like a nice person, not sure why you're doing it.
A "field" isn't actually "invisible" since it's just the name we give to what is essentially a group of values; "Fields" are just what we call measurements of a given property present in every point in a given region. Whether or not we measure these values at enormous levels, they are the result of actions that take place at an unimaginably tiny scale.
Blacksun1942 2 years ago 3
Just to be clear:
I never said I was an "expert" or "authority", I'm still just an undergrad! ....though I'm going to guess that I probably know more about physics than you do.
Blacksun1942 2 years ago 2
Love your answer.
tfrenn 2 years ago
Do you fully grasp it. modern physicist have theories but unifed theories are just as much a theory or perception of mind as anyone elses ideology but in the parts that they cant tie together they try to use math to justify. dont get me wrong physicist have made amzing leaps in our understanding, but i think that reality is bigger than any human has the capacity to fully comprehend.reality, truth andthe higher purpose in our existence cant be understood with science, religion or our feable minds
shannonnunn 2 years ago
Mathematics just happens to be the most accurate tool humanity has developed to quantify the observable, physical around us. It "justifies" the timing of the next solar eclipse with a higher degree of accuracy and reliability than any other tool at humanity's disposal.
Unlike other tools we use to discern the truth, the conclusions that math is used to draw are *only* verified by consistent observation; and they may become completely invalidated by just *one* observation.
Blacksun1942 2 years ago
i agree, yet the observable is only a small fraction of what exist. math has yet to discern the unseen and the true nature of the force that governs all that is observable and that which exist beyond observation. even though math is the most powerful asset at human disposable not all things in existance can be quantified and measured. even though this dilema exist it can not account for, or disprove the existence of that which is beyond the realm of human observation.
shannonnunn 2 years ago
I agree
Drizzy123 2 years ago
@Blacksun1942
What about the quantum physics experiments that seem to suggest that observing an event somehow changes the outcome?
cactusjake49 1 year ago
Great stuff. Loved it
marpoq 2 years ago
nice to see good people coming together and agreeing
COUNTCARDULAR 2 years ago
Thanks.
clarity2325 2 years ago
Hell ya its Bruce Lipton! I'm stoked Mercola likes his work!
ExplicitContent81 2 years ago
Thanks for giving me a positive perspective on these, its a nice change and something to think about.
zegerb0t 2 years ago
great video
wizkid2000 2 years ago
That video is great.
NWOSupporter2012 2 years ago
Can someone sum it up?
KissMeImPunk 2 years ago
Summary: The nonphysical attributes of life (spirit, thoughts, beliefs, attitudes) shape and form a meaningful world and existence which is based in cooperation and ideally an empowered humanity in harmony with the natural world. mmm?
Jaminator12 2 years ago 3
Yes:
Basically, if you percieve science like Bruce Lipton does; you can consolodate science with religion or illogical beliefs.
It's just taking a positive humanist perception of the outcomes and pretending they are determiners.
Teghead 2 years ago
Very excellent video!
carefulcarpenter 2 years ago
Lipton is one of the people I deeply respect, hes someone I would like to have as my university professor. He liberated himself from conservative, idiotic, arrogant, academic perception, which takes whats written in the books same as religious conservatives would, believing more to a book that was written at least 50 years ago then current empirical evidence.
Ttempest 2 years ago