I dunno. What he's doing with the piece harmonically is great. But the tempi and the dynamics are a bit too ... flippant, I think. It's like he's mocking the piece. Which maybe was intentional (he was no fan of French music, after all). But I find the flippancy off-putting.
I discovered this piece - and fell in love with it - through this recording. Gould captures the uneasiness and perversion of this work so well with his "x-ray of the music."
I love how above all the polyphony and wonderful harmonies, the pulse reigns supreme. It gives the change of harmony and lovely polyphony a wonderful fluidity and forward motion. GREAT!!!
I agree, nobody has anything on Glenn Gould. He's got it all -- the composition and the execution. Don't care if you agree, he's the closest thing we have had to a Bach or Beethoven in the last 100 years.
This is masterful but I think the glissandi in Ravel's transcription serve a lot of purposes. They give a sense of movement, fluidity and crystalline beauty to the work. If I had to critique Gould, I would say that some of the romance was written out of his transcription. It's a better version for the piano but ultimately is not as effective in painting that poeme choreographique that Ravel intended. I prefer the orchestral version in general.
Comment est-ce possible qu'il y ai aussi peu de vue la dessus?? C'est magnifique. Un bijou cette transcription de la valse de Maurice Ravel...je m'en lasse pas.!
what brilliant playing. I'm partial to the orchestral version as conducted by Charles Munch, but as always Gould provides a fantastic and deeply original interpretation
this is why the classical scene has died. In the end all that is left are you insolent obsequious children,substituting the multiplicity and myriad colours of art for your cheap subjective experience.True art knows no competition, but is organic and open to interpretation. Wretched urchin with their incessant childish yammering about who's best. No blue is best!, god i cannot stand the sound of red!!!, no there is no greater colour than turquoise!!! Go chase your bread&circus, hoi polloi!
Glenn recorded this as a response to some debate thing between him and Horowitz. I remember him saying, after playing this arrangement made for this occasion, "Horowitz has got nothing on me."
I like this even better than the orchestrated original, which sounds incoherent in many places. Ravel's own transcription is horrific, at around 4:45 there's agonizingly long glissandi between the chords, it physically hurt to hear something that hackneyed.
unsurpassed is exactly how i would describe this transcription and performance. one could spend a lifetime learning to play this and GG did it for entertainment out of his genre. it truly is shit your pants/melt my face good playing..
Anyone who has any doubts about Glenn Gould's stupendous technique only need to watch/listen to this performance.
Frozentoes1 1 week ago
A magical performance. Who plays this better than Gould? So far, nobody.
3001st 2 months ago 2
awesome piano:)
jmussuto 3 months ago
SPLENDIDO
ArcanoTre 5 months ago
I dunno. What he's doing with the piece harmonically is great. But the tempi and the dynamics are a bit too ... flippant, I think. It's like he's mocking the piece. Which maybe was intentional (he was no fan of French music, after all). But I find the flippancy off-putting.
NewtHarvest 6 months ago 6
Eat THAT, Horrorwitz.
CaptainBluebear08 8 months ago
and?
sabajojua 9 months ago
No Canpacor! Not video! :) I want the Note to print and play La Valse Transcribed by Glenn Gould I mean!
sabajojua 9 months ago
@sabajojua
yes, I was only joking :)
canpacor 9 months ago
Mamma mia!
canpacor 9 months ago
Where i Can Find notes Transcribed by Glenn Gould ravel`s vals?
sabajojua 10 months ago
@sabajojua
Here ;)
canpacor 9 months ago
¡¡¡¡BRAVO Glenn!!!!
javierleonenriquez 11 months ago
5:01 onwards is just heaven!
VamLoveAndKisses 11 months ago
@VamLoveAndKisses Agreed! :)
chislehurstbat 3 months ago
I discovered this piece - and fell in love with it - through this recording. Gould captures the uneasiness and perversion of this work so well with his "x-ray of the music."
aboikov 11 months ago
why does 5:04 remind me of batman???
the one with George Clooney in it
bachkwt 11 months ago
@bachkwt lol, I always think the same thing, but yeah, Batman's score is pretty similar.
andresruval 8 months ago
I love how above all the polyphony and wonderful harmonies, the pulse reigns supreme. It gives the change of harmony and lovely polyphony a wonderful fluidity and forward motion. GREAT!!!
zhangensprachen 1 year ago
YYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY GGGGG ++))=))-000)))=
Omnichronicles 1 year ago
he is just unique, he is just Gould!!!!!!!!!!!
thechristian01999 1 year ago
Some of the themes are reminiscent of Gaspard de la nuit.
LordCalvinHastings 1 year ago
I agree, nobody has anything on Glenn Gould. He's got it all -- the composition and the execution. Don't care if you agree, he's the closest thing we have had to a Bach or Beethoven in the last 100 years.
chaddyfromtheblock 1 year ago
@chaddyfromtheblock You've said it all. Gould is a crazy genius and I love this transcription and performance so much!
cfwpiano 1 year ago
This is masterful but I think the glissandi in Ravel's transcription serve a lot of purposes. They give a sense of movement, fluidity and crystalline beauty to the work. If I had to critique Gould, I would say that some of the romance was written out of his transcription. It's a better version for the piano but ultimately is not as effective in painting that poeme choreographique that Ravel intended. I prefer the orchestral version in general.
babydrane 1 year ago
Comment est-ce possible qu'il y ai aussi peu de vue la dessus?? C'est magnifique. Un bijou cette transcription de la valse de Maurice Ravel...je m'en lasse pas.!
defda94 1 year ago
I came..
Omnichronicles 1 year ago
This piece is so much better without those annoying glissandi...
vp1981ad 1 year ago
such drive and passion! g.g. always surprises.
kasyapa 1 year ago
what brilliant playing. I'm partial to the orchestral version as conducted by Charles Munch, but as always Gould provides a fantastic and deeply original interpretation
aaltobartok 1 year ago
this is why the classical scene has died. In the end all that is left are you insolent obsequious children,substituting the multiplicity and myriad colours of art for your cheap subjective experience.True art knows no competition, but is organic and open to interpretation. Wretched urchin with their incessant childish yammering about who's best. No blue is best!, god i cannot stand the sound of red!!!, no there is no greater colour than turquoise!!! Go chase your bread&circus, hoi polloi!
-R.Ant
RaRaLandEQ 1 year ago
The classical world is so much duller since the lost of this original genius.
ttrons2 1 year ago
Glenn recorded this as a response to some debate thing between him and Horowitz. I remember him saying, after playing this arrangement made for this occasion, "Horowitz has got nothing on me."
xxh3llfir3xx 1 year ago
Everything he touches turns to...
Iamgavin 1 year ago
Jesus fucking Christ, this is such an epic masterpiece, wonderfully transcribed and interpreted by Gould. This is sheer genius.
It's such a shame that most people only know Ravel's Bolero.
vanderbilt887 1 year ago
I like this even better than the orchestrated original, which sounds incoherent in many places. Ravel's own transcription is horrific, at around 4:45 there's agonizingly long glissandi between the chords, it physically hurt to hear something that hackneyed.
demosj 1 year ago
Comment removed
aaltobartok 1 year ago
braaaaavv-fucking -ooooooooo.
birdlivesforever 1 year ago
What a marvelous transcription. Everything Glenn does is unsurpassed....
dialecticon 1 year ago 14
@dialecticon
That he omitted all those distasteful glissando says it all. He literally gave birth to this piece the way no one could challenge. Bravo!
yuzu1009 1 year ago 8
@yuzu1009 Amen about those glissandos.... @______@
zhangensprachen 1 year ago
unsurpassed is exactly how i would describe this transcription and performance. one could spend a lifetime learning to play this and GG did it for entertainment out of his genre. it truly is shit your pants/melt my face good playing..
Omnichronicles 1 year ago
聴きたかった演奏!ありがとう!
555Monsterrr 2 years ago