There is the issue that a lot of NeoConservatives come from a Lovestonite anti-Stalinist background; they believe it is the duty and right of the US to 'spread democracy' by bombs.
note how military action is supported by them, it is NOT however, the only methodology
lately it's been getting a bad rap because of bush's rhetoric
thing is, a lot of people felt within the neocon camp that bush's methodology was flawed, although his rhetoric is highly similar to the neocon's in reasoning, the methods were as many felt, based on incompetency as opposed to any real sense of understanding
contrary to what a lot of people who claimed to be neoconservatives because they simply felt "bombing the democracy into a country" would be a good idea is... a lot of neoconservatives feel that it is unwise to attempt to do so, rather the idea is to take out specific individuals and organizations that pose a clear danger to the group you are a part of, in this case a nation called america, and to increase affluence in developing countries
however, that's only the best way to go about it as far as I'm concerned, or would've been the best way rather
your rhetoric's not very accurate... neoconservatism isn't so much solely about bombing other countries, it's about exportation of western values, through any means really, not simply militaristic means
and it doesn't mean cultural imperialism either, it means a slight imposition in foreign locations so that a comparison in that culture can be made between western and other ideals
speaking as someone who agrees with a lot of neoconservative stuff, iraq is a strategic error, it's stupid because it's ineffective
overseas action is fine, afghanistan is alright
in actuality, a BIGGER occupation would've succeeded, it's because of the military methods, crushing an insurgent movement before it can really start, is the key, but instead they let everyone go wild in the chaos and disbanded the system as corrupt/bad as it was pre-invasion, it was SOMETHING, and then there wasn't
Let's let Ron Paul speak for himself. Where is your actual video of Ron Paul saying the things that you imply? Being noticeably absent, I would hope that people would take a look at what he does say.
Does walking through a gun shop signify a neocon? GEEZ!
This video is just another tired misrepresentation of neoconservative philosophy, which is continually fed to impressionable minds by people in positions of legitimacy like Ron Paul. He has routinely mischaracterized neocons by parroting some of the most common myths perpetrated by their detractors, i.e.: the percieved notions that they're ardent scholars of Strauss, believe in American colonialism, embrace perpetual worldly conflict, believe in "noble lies", act as an Israeli proxy, etc..
LuckyPierre78, as I am very interested in this subject, I should like to know what exactly the neoconservatives really want and believe in. If what you call the "common myths" are not true, what IS the truth regarding the neoconservatives?
It's important to understand that neoconservatism is not a movement aspiring to central organized characteristics, but rather a tendency. There is no set of neoconservative beliefs, only a set of attitudes derived from historical experience. The neocon position might be summed up as diplomacy if possible, force if necessary; the UN if possible, ad hoc coalitions or unilateral action if necessary; preemptive strikes if it's reasonable to anticipate hostile action on the part of America's enemies.
The ideas that have come to be associated with neocons are more a product of the circumstances in which the world finds itself, than a result of the success of a cabal of mainly Jewish intellectuals in capturing the hearts and minds of both the Blair and Bush administrations. Barring extraordinary events, the US will always feel obliged to defend, if possible, a democratic nation under attack from non-democratic forces. No complicated geopolitical calculations of national interest are necessary.
It's a malicious myth to suggest that neocons are Jews who serve the interests of Israel. Yes, neocons have links to the Likud Party, but they also have links to the British Tories and other conservative parties around the world. These connections reflect ideological, not ethnic, affinity. While many neocons are Jewish, many are not. Yet they are as committed to Israel's defense as Jewish neocons are, a commitment based not on shared religion or ethnicity but on shared liberal democratic values.
Neocons are hardly a well-organized, well-funded cabal. The Project for a New American Century, the leading neocon foreign policy think tank had a staff of five. Its resources pale next to the Brookings Institution, Heritage Foundation and Cato Institute, three of the biggest Washington think tanks, none of them sympathetic to the neoconservative vision of foreign policy. Neocons have been relatively influential because of the strength of their arguments, not their connections.
Like most conservatives, neocons are deeply suspicious of the United Nations, which they fear is animated by anti-Americanism. But unlike some on the right, they are happy to make common cause with the UN when doing so will serve US interests. Neocons are committed above all to US global leadership, and they know that the costs of such leadership are so high that the United States needs allies to share the burden. For this reason, neocons have been vocal advocates of expanding NATO.
According to some of their more heated critics, neocons view the world in Manichean terms, guided by the spirit of Leo Strauss. This portrayal isa crude caricature of those who believe that American values are worth defending at home and abroad. That conviction was, in fact, the view of Strauss, himself a largely apolitical professor. He was a firm believer in US democracy, which, he thought, needed to be defended by a well-educated elite. Strauss inspired some early neocons; few read him today.
LuckyPierre78, thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate it. As English is not my native language and because I am not familiar with the subject, it will take me some time to fully comprehend what you have written. You are obviously very knowledgeable. Thanks.
You have to know Ron Paul is totally against Nation Building...A true conservative would never want to waste 10 billion a month for years..Or build the government bigger and bigger...But because Bush did these things under the name of being a conservative...We got CHANGE you can believe in...Boy I'm loving this CHANGE..21,000 more troops in Afghanistan, The stopping of attachment spending ( lol ) The same deadline on leaving Iraq...Printing More money with no backing !
Interesting perspective, but unfortunately it is the Royal Families, the world leaders that are covertly related to them and the global bankers who want to see America, disarmed, bankrupt and destroyed, especially the middle class. These people are loyal to building an international tyrannical one-world government structure covertly using things like war of terror fear-mongering and climate change paranoia to dupe people into giving away their freedoms for a false sense of security.
You do make some very interesting points, and they are valid. However, I think this is the wrong election for it. If McCain is elected this year we will have the White House for the 2010 census we will have the White House for quite some time afterwards. We can't afford to pass up that opportunity.
JohnanRaatz --- Don't ya think there are issues and attrocities which stretch accross our current parties? I believe many issues point towards our WHOLE government being corrupt. We need politicians whom will accept, preach, defend & die for Freedom & Liberty.
Hey Ridley Report Guy- I met you in NH. I was part of the females for freedom who waved flags. Liked this video. We are going to go the way of the soviets if we keep spending the way we ae spending. Osama said that he was going to topple us by bankrupting us not through terrorism. If Osama sends two of his guys to a location in the middle of the desert it costs us $1 million for troops and weapons and military intelligance to find the two guys and get them out. This was his plan all along.
Ridley Report...how can we get our message to the next wave of immigrants? How about promoting the bill of rights in ten languages, on video; on YouTube and other video sites?
we don't have a future unless we turn around now. our enemies, I mean the people who have only been our friends because they're afraid of us, will start to climb out of the shadows and smoother us when we're too weak to even feed ourselves.
I feel that the elite fascist socialists (neo cons) didn't even figure that Ron Paul will last this long. Now the majority of the American people think that Ron Paul's not running anymore because of the mainstream media taking him off the list of contenders. I feel that RP has a chance 'cause of the dropping $ and the economy. None of the other candidates are talking about it nor do they understand it therefore, I think people that have a brain will choose Ron Paul close to the end of the year
They are all talking about it now, even McCain made the claim he is well versed in economics...meaning he can list the names of the people (who work for Bush now) that will work for HIM to keep our economy strong... such a joke..a sad sad joke :(
The jews manipulated the United States & England into attacking Iraq & removing the regime of Saddam Hussein. Saddam was planning to attack Israel & return the land to the Palestinians. The Iraq war is yet another lie perpetrated by the zionist swine!!!
Nice try RidleyReport!! But trying to rationalize with neo-cons about saving a country from a bankruptcy isn't going to work. Also it seems you still have hope for the voters to come to their senses? But it's too late! The majority have already drank the last glass of Kool-aid and its down down down. Good try though.
The FED created play money to back JP Morgan Co (shareholder and founder of Federal Reserve Bank) so that WE THE PEOPLE can pay the interest on that play money via Federal Income tax. Welcome to the buy-up of banks and welcome to the next depression and welcome to the New World Order. This is what Council of Foreign Relation members Clinton, Obama and McCain will give you.
Check out Irving Kristol and his hell spawn Bill. Neo-cons do not want a sustainable economy and they want constant warfare. This de-stabilizes governments and allows for control to move toward a central government. Our country heads toward a fascist state at the same occupying countries to expand the gov's power at the cost of the people. The banks can fund this gov's actions because war benefits the military-industrial complex feeding the banks by borrowing from the fed and world banks.
Dave, I really think that the problem is that the NEOs dont understand the economics of the situation. Those who benefit financially from this situation are the same ones that set the debate. It may require an economic collapse to convince these people that when a government outgrows its economy, it is destructive no matter what it is spent on, with the possible exceptions of investments in productivity increases through infrastructure, R&D and occupation specific education.
Good point for those "strong US defensers" out there!
McCain is talking about 100 years in Iraq as well as bombing Iran. With what? The current number one US export is debt, and that is only possible because the Chinese government has huge dollar reserves, which, if dumped on the global market, would cause the dollar to lose even more value until the military couldn't even afford the fuel for the armed forces.
what a Rude pig. If you don't like it, don't watch it A-Hole! The Paulbots as you call them have a belief and the last time I checked, we still have freedom of speech. If you don't like it, don't listen. You might not want to watch the news June 21st if you don't like hearing the Paultards.
Please have more respect, Ron Paul is a good American. Just because he isn't winning doesn't mean his followers don't have a right to explain his views to the many who have him misunderstood. The constitution should have a chance in politics also.
To which moron are YOU planning to give your vote? Mr. S&L I treated my first wife like crap - LIBERAL McCain? Hitlery (in bed with the insurance industry/lobbyists, I want more H1B visas so we can put more high-tech Americans out of work? Perhaps you'd like slum-lord lover Mr. Tony Rezco Obama? Why don't you use the brain God gave you and think for yourself? Perhaps you prefer a life of slavery?
In the future all supplies are going to cost more becuase the dollar is being flooded on the market (by both CONGRESS and THE FED), which means that we won't have the money to buy things (both the average American and our Government- I know they are borrowing now, but China isn't going to put up with this forever)~! Blessings, Dave (much wisdom) J.S.
Of course it's not a neoconservitive position. A lot of neocons are a bunch of ignorant flag waving phonies, that don't have a clue about what is really going on. Thanks for trying to explain it to them, even if most of them won't see your video, because they are to busy getting their propaganda from FOX news.
There is the issue that a lot of NeoConservatives come from a Lovestonite anti-Stalinist background; they believe it is the duty and right of the US to 'spread democracy' by bombs.
RJMooreII 1 year ago
neoconservatism has an article on wikipedia
htt p://en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Neoconservatism
note how military action is supported by them, it is NOT however, the only methodology
lately it's been getting a bad rap because of bush's rhetoric
thing is, a lot of people felt within the neocon camp that bush's methodology was flawed, although his rhetoric is highly similar to the neocon's in reasoning, the methods were as many felt, based on incompetency as opposed to any real sense of understanding
noobler9 1 year ago
contrary to what a lot of people who claimed to be neoconservatives because they simply felt "bombing the democracy into a country" would be a good idea is... a lot of neoconservatives feel that it is unwise to attempt to do so, rather the idea is to take out specific individuals and organizations that pose a clear danger to the group you are a part of, in this case a nation called america, and to increase affluence in developing countries
noobler9 1 year ago
however, that's only the best way to go about it as far as I'm concerned, or would've been the best way rather
your rhetoric's not very accurate... neoconservatism isn't so much solely about bombing other countries, it's about exportation of western values, through any means really, not simply militaristic means
and it doesn't mean cultural imperialism either, it means a slight imposition in foreign locations so that a comparison in that culture can be made between western and other ideals
noobler9 1 year ago
speaking as someone who agrees with a lot of neoconservative stuff, iraq is a strategic error, it's stupid because it's ineffective
overseas action is fine, afghanistan is alright
in actuality, a BIGGER occupation would've succeeded, it's because of the military methods, crushing an insurgent movement before it can really start, is the key, but instead they let everyone go wild in the chaos and disbanded the system as corrupt/bad as it was pre-invasion, it was SOMETHING, and then there wasn't
noobler9 1 year ago
I am a traditional conservative similar to Ron Paul and i want nothing to do with these NeoCon communist pigs.
PikSokolit 1 year ago
Let's let Ron Paul speak for himself. Where is your actual video of Ron Paul saying the things that you imply? Being noticeably absent, I would hope that people would take a look at what he does say.
Does walking through a gun shop signify a neocon? GEEZ!
CentrlFlagrl 2 years ago
OH MY GOD!!! Please NO neocons in this movement! NO THANK YOU.
whynotflip 2 years ago
This video is just another tired misrepresentation of neoconservative philosophy, which is continually fed to impressionable minds by people in positions of legitimacy like Ron Paul. He has routinely mischaracterized neocons by parroting some of the most common myths perpetrated by their detractors, i.e.: the percieved notions that they're ardent scholars of Strauss, believe in American colonialism, embrace perpetual worldly conflict, believe in "noble lies", act as an Israeli proxy, etc..
LuckyPierre78 2 years ago
LuckyPierre78, as I am very interested in this subject, I should like to know what exactly the neoconservatives really want and believe in. If what you call the "common myths" are not true, what IS the truth regarding the neoconservatives?
wauzi123 2 years ago
It's important to understand that neoconservatism is not a movement aspiring to central organized characteristics, but rather a tendency. There is no set of neoconservative beliefs, only a set of attitudes derived from historical experience. The neocon position might be summed up as diplomacy if possible, force if necessary; the UN if possible, ad hoc coalitions or unilateral action if necessary; preemptive strikes if it's reasonable to anticipate hostile action on the part of America's enemies.
LuckyPierre78 2 years ago
The ideas that have come to be associated with neocons are more a product of the circumstances in which the world finds itself, than a result of the success of a cabal of mainly Jewish intellectuals in capturing the hearts and minds of both the Blair and Bush administrations. Barring extraordinary events, the US will always feel obliged to defend, if possible, a democratic nation under attack from non-democratic forces. No complicated geopolitical calculations of national interest are necessary.
LuckyPierre78 2 years ago
It's a malicious myth to suggest that neocons are Jews who serve the interests of Israel. Yes, neocons have links to the Likud Party, but they also have links to the British Tories and other conservative parties around the world. These connections reflect ideological, not ethnic, affinity. While many neocons are Jewish, many are not. Yet they are as committed to Israel's defense as Jewish neocons are, a commitment based not on shared religion or ethnicity but on shared liberal democratic values.
LuckyPierre78 2 years ago
Neocons are hardly a well-organized, well-funded cabal. The Project for a New American Century, the leading neocon foreign policy think tank had a staff of five. Its resources pale next to the Brookings Institution, Heritage Foundation and Cato Institute, three of the biggest Washington think tanks, none of them sympathetic to the neoconservative vision of foreign policy. Neocons have been relatively influential because of the strength of their arguments, not their connections.
LuckyPierre78 2 years ago
Like most conservatives, neocons are deeply suspicious of the United Nations, which they fear is animated by anti-Americanism. But unlike some on the right, they are happy to make common cause with the UN when doing so will serve US interests. Neocons are committed above all to US global leadership, and they know that the costs of such leadership are so high that the United States needs allies to share the burden. For this reason, neocons have been vocal advocates of expanding NATO.
LuckyPierre78 2 years ago
According to some of their more heated critics, neocons view the world in Manichean terms, guided by the spirit of Leo Strauss. This portrayal isa crude caricature of those who believe that American values are worth defending at home and abroad. That conviction was, in fact, the view of Strauss, himself a largely apolitical professor. He was a firm believer in US democracy, which, he thought, needed to be defended by a well-educated elite. Strauss inspired some early neocons; few read him today.
LuckyPierre78 2 years ago
LuckyPierre78, thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate it. As English is not my native language and because I am not familiar with the subject, it will take me some time to fully comprehend what you have written. You are obviously very knowledgeable. Thanks.
wauzi123 2 years ago
You have to know Ron Paul is totally against Nation Building...A true conservative would never want to waste 10 billion a month for years..Or build the government bigger and bigger...But because Bush did these things under the name of being a conservative...We got CHANGE you can believe in...Boy I'm loving this CHANGE..21,000 more troops in Afghanistan, The stopping of attachment spending ( lol ) The same deadline on leaving Iraq...Printing More money with no backing !
Uwiluz60 2 years ago
(sarcasm on) Yes, us Ron Paul supporters shouldn't even talk to them neocons. They're THE JEWS!
Am I right, or am I right? (sarcasm off)
MaverickWhig 2 years ago
Interesting perspective, but unfortunately it is the Royal Families, the world leaders that are covertly related to them and the global bankers who want to see America, disarmed, bankrupt and destroyed, especially the middle class. These people are loyal to building an international tyrannical one-world government structure covertly using things like war of terror fear-mongering and climate change paranoia to dupe people into giving away their freedoms for a false sense of security.
kmeixner 3 years ago 4
You do make some very interesting points, and they are valid. However, I think this is the wrong election for it. If McCain is elected this year we will have the White House for the 2010 census we will have the White House for quite some time afterwards. We can't afford to pass up that opportunity.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
JohnanRaatz --- Don't ya think there are issues and attrocities which stretch accross our current parties? I believe many issues point towards our WHOLE government being corrupt. We need politicians whom will accept, preach, defend & die for Freedom & Liberty.
CaJeffO 3 years ago 3
Hey Ridley Report Guy- I met you in NH. I was part of the females for freedom who waved flags. Liked this video. We are going to go the way of the soviets if we keep spending the way we ae spending. Osama said that he was going to topple us by bankrupting us not through terrorism. If Osama sends two of his guys to a location in the middle of the desert it costs us $1 million for troops and weapons and military intelligance to find the two guys and get them out. This was his plan all along.
fightfortruth1776 3 years ago
Ridley Report...how can we get our message to the next wave of immigrants? How about promoting the bill of rights in ten languages, on video; on YouTube and other video sites?
vhbeazel 3 years ago
we don't have a future unless we turn around now. our enemies, I mean the people who have only been our friends because they're afraid of us, will start to climb out of the shadows and smoother us when we're too weak to even feed ourselves.
czorbin 3 years ago
I feel that the elite fascist socialists (neo cons) didn't even figure that Ron Paul will last this long. Now the majority of the American people think that Ron Paul's not running anymore because of the mainstream media taking him off the list of contenders. I feel that RP has a chance 'cause of the dropping $ and the economy. None of the other candidates are talking about it nor do they understand it therefore, I think people that have a brain will choose Ron Paul close to the end of the year
keokirhodes 3 years ago
They are all talking about it now, even McCain made the claim he is well versed in economics...meaning he can list the names of the people (who work for Bush now) that will work for HIM to keep our economy strong... such a joke..a sad sad joke :(
milliradian 3 years ago
The jews manipulated the United States & England into attacking Iraq & removing the regime of Saddam Hussein. Saddam was planning to attack Israel & return the land to the Palestinians. The Iraq war is yet another lie perpetrated by the zionist swine!!!
Seadweller451 3 years ago
Nice try RidleyReport!! But trying to rationalize with neo-cons about saving a country from a bankruptcy isn't going to work. Also it seems you still have hope for the voters to come to their senses? But it's too late! The majority have already drank the last glass of Kool-aid and its down down down. Good try though.
shiftstart 3 years ago
Yes it is a Neocon position to Invade, Bomb, Kill, and Occupy Mideastern Countries for a Hundred years, Budget and Debt be damned.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
Very sane discussion, indeed.
But how come they could become so insane!
pjbridge 3 years ago
The FED created play money to back JP Morgan Co (shareholder and founder of Federal Reserve Bank) so that WE THE PEOPLE can pay the interest on that play money via Federal Income tax. Welcome to the buy-up of banks and welcome to the next depression and welcome to the New World Order. This is what Council of Foreign Relation members Clinton, Obama and McCain will give you.
Ron Paul 08!
Goobyusa 3 years ago
Check out Irving Kristol and his hell spawn Bill. Neo-cons do not want a sustainable economy and they want constant warfare. This de-stabilizes governments and allows for control to move toward a central government. Our country heads toward a fascist state at the same occupying countries to expand the gov's power at the cost of the people. The banks can fund this gov's actions because war benefits the military-industrial complex feeding the banks by borrowing from the fed and world banks.
SSSLLLAAYYEEERRRR 3 years ago
Dave, I really think that the problem is that the NEOs dont understand the economics of the situation. Those who benefit financially from this situation are the same ones that set the debate. It may require an economic collapse to convince these people that when a government outgrows its economy, it is destructive no matter what it is spent on, with the possible exceptions of investments in productivity increases through infrastructure, R&D and occupation specific education.
MalumProhibitum 3 years ago 3
not neo-con, but fascist socialist.
wovenbeats 3 years ago
Good point for those "strong US defensers" out there!
McCain is talking about 100 years in Iraq as well as bombing Iran. With what? The current number one US export is debt, and that is only possible because the Chinese government has huge dollar reserves, which, if dumped on the global market, would cause the dollar to lose even more value until the military couldn't even afford the fuel for the armed forces.
liber8US 3 years ago 2
The only one, THAT ANSWERS THE QUESTIONS.
VOTE RON PAUL.
freedomintheus 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul is done. Why don't the Paulbots STFU?
dudemanbearpig 3 years ago
what a Rude pig. If you don't like it, don't watch it A-Hole! The Paulbots as you call them have a belief and the last time I checked, we still have freedom of speech. If you don't like it, don't listen. You might not want to watch the news June 21st if you don't like hearing the Paultards.
dewboy910 3 years ago 3
Because you're an idiot
sonnybrown 3 years ago
Please have more respect, Ron Paul is a good American. Just because he isn't winning doesn't mean his followers don't have a right to explain his views to the many who have him misunderstood. The constitution should have a chance in politics also.
shanklinmike 3 years ago 3
To which moron are YOU planning to give your vote? Mr. S&L I treated my first wife like crap - LIBERAL McCain? Hitlery (in bed with the insurance industry/lobbyists, I want more H1B visas so we can put more high-tech Americans out of work? Perhaps you'd like slum-lord lover Mr. Tony Rezco Obama? Why don't you use the brain God gave you and think for yourself? Perhaps you prefer a life of slavery?
Goobyusa 3 years ago
In the future all supplies are going to cost more becuase the dollar is being flooded on the market (by both CONGRESS and THE FED), which means that we won't have the money to buy things (both the average American and our Government- I know they are borrowing now, but China isn't going to put up with this forever)~! Blessings, Dave (much wisdom) J.S.
JSenator06 3 years ago 2
Of course it's not a neoconservitive position. A lot of neocons are a bunch of ignorant flag waving phonies, that don't have a clue about what is really going on. Thanks for trying to explain it to them, even if most of them won't see your video, because they are to busy getting their propaganda from FOX news.
JeffnDenmark 3 years ago 11
I guess a neo-con that supports Ron Paul does not remain a neo-con any longer... but then I haven't yet watched the vid :)
europarl 3 years ago 2
way to say it how it is. Didn't like the chopy cuts though...
hagenttzd 3 years ago
watch?v=o8S8N2OG7sU
Not just no...but HELL NO!
Bonecrkr 3 years ago