Very sensible, if you don't know what it is, just blow it up. Betther safe then sorry. No one has ever been attacked by a ship that has already been destroyed.
@Idazmi An imperial star destroyer can lay waste to an entire planet rendering it uninhabitable. Google Base Delta Zero. Star Wars has warship and the Imperal Star Destroyer is just that. The enterprise a weak scout ship. 25,000 Imperial Star Destroyers were built. How many ships does your federation have?
@Idazmi7: How is a ship so small and so weak a warship, where are the troops, where are the tanks? The federation has no real army to speak of. No, they are scout, that's all they do. Look at new planets, fuck around the galaxy at very slow speeds and screw green humanoids.
@Iffy350 U.S.S Enterprise is a 947 foot long Heavy Cruiser, with powerful human and alien weapons technology. (Phasers are human, Photon Torpedoes are Klingon) It is comissioned to "Police and uphold the interests of the Federation, and defend the 262 United Federation member planets from all planetary
threats". Starfleet Ground warfare uses personal ray shields.
"Little scout" applies to Daedalus class *explorers*, which are armed only with nukes and lasers, and are only 300 feet long.
@Iffy350 If you paid any attention to either the 2009 movie or the original series you would know that the enterprise is frigging massive and that there are 200 people on it. on top of that, the federation doesn't need tanks or troops because they can do everything an army can do and more from space.
@Idazmi7: You don't need to spam my inbox asshol. Not everyone is a looser like you with nothing better to do than argue about science fiction bullshit on youtube. Star Trek and Star Wars are both fake. Get over it. Get a fucking life you troll.
"u must read this once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight & haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste "
Star Trek is based several hundred years in the future where as star wars is set thousands of years in the past. Besides a squadron of K-Wing bombers would rape the Enterprise.
@Iffy350 The old Enterprise (the one pictured) can destroy cities with just it's phasers, (torpedoes are more powerful) and can level an M-class planet's surface, as per the Original Series episodes "Mirror, Mirror", and "A Taste of Armageddon". The old Enterprise is 86 years old in Trek time, making it very outdated. K-wing THAT.
@FATE522 I'm not criticizing anyone, I simply took advantage of the fact I had Nichelle Nichols saying Millennium Falcon and William Shattner saying Star Wars? So I edited together a scene in which I could use both lines and have it make some sense. I love both Star Wars and Star Trek! I hope you enjoyed my little video!!
No doubt I enjoyed it. :) It just appears that you are saying one is better than the other. :P But it is great to see you love both and I do to. :) Keep up the good work :)
@lgmmrm except for two things you forgot. One we have the best shilds and two one blast from us and a stupid lone X wing would fail even to a simple lighsaber of which i could prove if you need me too.
Star Trek rules!!!!! Star Wars keeps repeating itself in different generations
@lgmmrm Excuse me, but which Enterprise? There have been seven, The NX-01, NCC-1701,A,B,C,D and E. and remember each Enterprise was stronger and more powerful than the one before it, with better Shields, Phasers and Torpedo capabilities. Not to mention better Warp Drives that can work in close quarters (Picard Manouver) as opposed to hyper drives which are only good for long distance travel.
@lgmmrm so it has been mathmatically proven that the Starship U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D Galaxy Class, which could run rings around all the previous starships named Enterprise, could be beaten easily by an X wing? Sorry but NO CHANCE. Remember the Enterprise D does have saucer Seperation, making it effectively TWO (2) ships verses ONE (1) X-wing. What I was meaning was which Enterprise could an X-Wing destroy easily? Archer's NX-01, Maby. NOT the D.
@lgmmrm How? Both of them are works of fiction! What you said is just as stupidly inane as saying it's been genetically proven that Wookies are stronger than Klingons.
Get off your chair, leave your room, go outside, get a life!
@VinnyMonster1 both filmmakers have books that have power outputs and shielding and all that shit, both franchises go so far into it that they have the numbers and.. well, you get it..
@lgmmrm But it's all imaginary! You can't prove an imaginary thing with mathematics!
Ultimately, this is just like the numerous 'which superhero is the best' arguments.
And I strongly suspect that the producers of the Star Wars tech manuals and what have you decided that their gear would be more powerful than Trek gear. Either way, it's a 5 year old's argument. The only thing that is of any importance is the quality of the shows and/or movies.
@VinnyMonster1 Yes you can prove an imaginary thing with mathematics. I forget if it was the asteroid belt or Pluto. Unfortunately, after you prove something it's no longer imaginary.
@UglySean The Asteroid Belt and Pluto are not imaginary. You're talking about proving a hypothetical or a theoretical thing, which is entirely different. Let me put it another way. You can't prove a fictional thing with mathematics because it does not exist. The Star Trek and the Star Wars universe do not exist, therefore nothing within them can be proven mathematically.
End of the day, does it really matter which fictional universe has the bigger and/or better stuff?
@VinnyMonster1 What I am saying is that at one time the Asteroids and Pluto WERE hypothetical concepts because they hadn't been discovered yet. One, maybe bother were first theorized using mathematics. I think it was the asteroids because due to some yahoo's math there had to be something between Mars and Jupiter. Until that time its existence was hypothetical as far as Earthlings were concerned. Same with alleged planets beyond Pluto or Mercury. Imaginary until proven real.
very funny but the Falcon would wipe the Enterprise from the stars, they MIGHT not have as much firepower but the Falcon could outmaneuver the Enterprise and it's weaponry with little effort......
still a funny clip though! As long as everyone realizes that the Falcon would totally win.... with no contest....... whatsoever......
@albion432 yeah so i guess that means that in the star wars "universe" the enterprise vs star wars ships (during time of enterprise is built) would be like sticks vs nuclear weapons (because if they had that type of tech long ago imagine what they would have now) and the millenium falcon would b a totally outdated piece of junk
most ships in star wars could kick the enterprise's ass. like star destroyers, mon calimari cruisers, venator cruisers, executor SSD, eclipse SSD (no chance the enterprise could beat the eclipse or executor. and if u dont no wat it is then look it up), ect. star wars ships r jus bettr. but the millenium falcon would probably lose 2 the enterprise
Hmm...the Constitution is an outdated hunk of junk...and the Millenium Falcon is an outdated hunk of junk. This would be close.
But then, the Enterprise is bigger, and has a larger crew. Phasers are probably more powerful too. The Falcon's a souped up medium freighter with a few plasma guns and small missles strapped onto it. I'd say the Enterprise would win, if they fought that is.
everyone just stfu ok? there is not a better ship. in the case of a battle the falcon couldnt damage the enterprise and the enterprise couldnt hit the falcon. its a stalemate.
okay look, the millenium falcon could totally outmanuver the enterprise. they have better gunners and shields to hold up against a star destroyer! no way the star trek guys would win
With the special effects of the 1960s, theoretically, yes. However, if I remember right, the technology (warp / hyper speed ) is about the same. While the Falcon is more maneuverable at first glance because it is a crap load smaller, the Enterprise is no slouch itself. It'd give Sulu would give Solo a run for his money ! *giggles*
thats true but there is no way a ship could fly like the millenium falcon. Their way of flying is like airplanes of ww2. there is no way a ship could do those manuveuers. As for a star destroyer. If they eat 5 photon torpedoes in the bridge we will see who is the best. As far as i remember star trek ships have adjustable shields. A star destroyer doesnt. Without mention the cloaking ability of the birds of pray.
are you high? the millenium falcon is not an airplane!!! this is space where there are light sabers and talking robots, don't tell me they can't fly. and the enterprise does not have a cloaking device
maybe there will be a time when light sabers will be developed. We are already living in a time were robots are talking. But there will never be a time that spaceships will be able to fly and manuveuer like millenium falcon. Its against phycics. in star wars the ships make turns that need gravity. but there is no gravity in space. If you can read you will find out that i was talking about the cloaking ability not of the enterprise but of the BIRDS OF PRAY.
name ONE way enterprise would win. falcon shields and firepower > enterprise shields and firepower. and dont try the size thing. yoda was tiny and he reached age 900. the death star 2 was huge and it lasted 3 years.
and sw proton torpedos have 150 megaton shaped charges, so all 150 megatons are used. st photon torpedos have 48 megaton normal charges so only 24 megatons is used, the rest dissipates into space.
Please, the entire original trilogy associates the force as a spiritual/mental growth obtained through rigorous mental focus and exercise. The newer half refutes everything substantiated in those films by saying that the force is governed by magical creatures in your body.
It's all fiction based on science...Thus the tag 'science fiction.'
Not really thinking about that. The light sabers and blasters are both ran by ozone. I'm working on figuring out what the phaser thingys are. I'm a huge fan of either one so I'm not going to go into a huger report about engines and stuff cause I'm not a huge fan of either one, but that's what I mean. Of course the whole force thing is bs but so is spok's mindmelding and shoulder pinch. I just think star wars has a bit more science in it. I think they made a special on it.
Then why drag 'real' science into it? Everyone knows that star trek is just a bunch of fictional jargon...Avoiding the jargon doesn't make Star Wars any more or less 'real' it just means theres less emphasis.
I'll agree to disagree with your assertion that the force creates midichlorians...I am admittingly not the biggest Star Wars fan (although I do enjoy the films) I am just going off of my own interpretations of the prequels.
At any rate, I'm not trying to start a fight or anything.
Hmm, sorry my original reply was to Acco. I wasn't even talking to you, you just jumped in and I didn't notice. My fault.
My original post was just a rebuttle to Acco for him saying that Star Wars has more 'true' science, which I think is absolutely ridiculous. I wasn't bashing Star Wars.
Oh really? Then explain how a farm boy with about as much mental focus as is necessary to wank himself can be as powerful as Vader with about a week of training...
Because he was the chosen one, you moron. He finished the basic jedi training, and only defeated vader because he was his son and vader had doubts about killing him.
Vader was holding back, because the emperor said he was going to intervene if things went awry, of course that was a lie.
Yeah I'm pretty sure that the enire original trilogy pretty much went on and on about how luke was the chosen one, hero of the rebellion and son of one of the most powerful jedi to have ever lived.
A skilled bush pilot, who practiced racing in beggars canyon and bulleying 1-2 meter womp rats manually.
You would REALLY have to be pretty dense if you missed that.
@PrincessFiana As long as people can agree they're not the same type of amazing, and as long as we don't get a Star Wars movie which is only pretending to be Star Trek *cough*ST09*cough*
did you just say F me. Oh no you didn't. How do you know the enterprise couldn't go up on a vertical climb. it was done in star trek II. Slave 1 is not a capital ship in wars, it can be beat by the enterprise..
no the enterprise would withstand full laser barrage from the slave 1's lasers. (I'm ignoring the star wars technical manual for you warsies) As for those depth charges he has the enterprise can simple just go up on a vertical climb and avoid it. The Enterprise fires torpedoes and boom bye bye boba fett. :)
Uhura's line comes from the audio book version of "The Nitpickers Guide to Classic Star Trek" and was in reference to an actor in the episode "The Enemy Within" calling Sulu "Solo". That line was actually the insperation behind the whole edit, I just had to use it somehow! Thanks for asking!
The Enterprise is considored a battle cruiser, its size may be smaller, than the outragiously sized Star Wars vessels, but the smaller size makes for more maneuverability.
Full impulse, is traveling just under the speed of light. Warp 10 is considered in Star Trek is at which point you can be going so fast, you can be anywhere at anytime.
No most star trek ships have a maximum of warp 9.99, but they have increasing from there, ex. stopped, 1/2 impulse, full impulse, warp 1, 2, and so on. When the ship passes its maximum speed, which usually is Warp 10, its considored to be going so fast, it is basically traversing time, b/c it can be anywhere at any time.
usless and stupid Trekki propaganda. lol
juresaiyan 1 month ago
Funny, liked it! I recognised the 'Star WARS?' sample from when Teh Shat did a turn at the dinner honouring George Lucas.
I see you're getting the usual bucketloads of comments from 'fans' arguing the toss between Trek and SW. lol! Some things never change!
manchesterbadger 2 months ago
One Death Star ray would destroy the Enterprise of what ever fuck you
VongolaAQW223 2 months ago
very funny. nice.
paul4opus 2 months ago
Very sensible, if you don't know what it is, just blow it up. Betther safe then sorry. No one has ever been attacked by a ship that has already been destroyed.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
now take yur genocidle ass, off of my bridge
darkmarcz 2 months ago
Comment removed
Iffy350 2 months ago
Great video.
Cococrash11 3 months ago
@Idazmi An imperial star destroyer can lay waste to an entire planet rendering it uninhabitable. Google Base Delta Zero. Star Wars has warship and the Imperal Star Destroyer is just that. The enterprise a weak scout ship. 25,000 Imperial Star Destroyers were built. How many ships does your federation have?
Iffy350 4 months ago
@Iffy350 Exactly the same. Also, if the Enterprise is a "weak scoutship" what does that say for warships? Not to mention:
/wiki/Constitution_class_starship
Idiot.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
@Idazmi7: How is a ship so small and so weak a warship, where are the troops, where are the tanks? The federation has no real army to speak of. No, they are scout, that's all they do. Look at new planets, fuck around the galaxy at very slow speeds and screw green humanoids.
Iffy350 4 months ago
@Iffy350 U.S.S Enterprise is a 947 foot long Heavy Cruiser, with powerful human and alien weapons technology. (Phasers are human, Photon Torpedoes are Klingon) It is comissioned to "Police and uphold the interests of the Federation, and defend the 262 United Federation member planets from all planetary
threats". Starfleet Ground warfare uses personal ray shields.
"Little scout" applies to Daedalus class *explorers*, which are armed only with nukes and lasers, and are only 300 feet long.
Idazmi7 3 months ago
@Iffy350 If you paid any attention to either the 2009 movie or the original series you would know that the enterprise is frigging massive and that there are 200 people on it. on top of that, the federation doesn't need tanks or troops because they can do everything an army can do and more from space.
dmoll14 2 months ago
@Iffy350 Search that link at Wikipedia.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
@Idazmi7: Jesus, get a life you halfwit cunt.
Iffy350 4 months ago
@Iffy350 Also, your info is Non-Canon.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
@Idazmi7: You don't need to spam my inbox asshol. Not everyone is a looser like you with nothing better to do than argue about science fiction bullshit on youtube. Star Trek and Star Wars are both fake. Get over it. Get a fucking life you troll.
Iffy350 4 months ago
It would have been cool if Star Trek made an episode with Star Wars.
stalkingalizee 4 months ago
Comment removed
Sirrom5 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
only on youtube can a video about star wars and star trek lead to a hypothetical, philosophical conversation about Pluto and asteroid belts
yallbugin 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
only on youtube can a video about star wars and star trek lead to a hypothetical/ philosophical conversation about Pluto and asteroid belts
yallbugin 4 months ago
only on youtube can a video about star wars and star trek lead to a hypothetical/ philosophical conversation about Pluto and asteroid belts
yallbugin 4 months ago
Damn. That's why Harrison Ford myseriously stopped making movies.
UglySean 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"u must read this once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murderded in 1945. her body was not found until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 vidoes in 30 minutes the dead girl will apear in your room tonight & haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste "
Rhyann1999 4 months ago
You're arguing over what?
Mal1234567 5 months ago
Star Trek is based several hundred years in the future where as star wars is set thousands of years in the past. Besides a squadron of K-Wing bombers would rape the Enterprise.
Iffy350 5 months ago
@Iffy350 The old Enterprise (the one pictured) can destroy cities with just it's phasers, (torpedoes are more powerful) and can level an M-class planet's surface, as per the Original Series episodes "Mirror, Mirror", and "A Taste of Armageddon". The old Enterprise is 86 years old in Trek time, making it very outdated. K-wing THAT.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
It doesn't matter who could win, the are both good... Aside from which an Atlantian Puddle Jumper could wipe the floor with both of them.
MichealCobra 6 months ago
The Enterprise couldn't catch the Falcon. You got her going star trek speed!! Total fail. Nice form.
shinobi1kenobi75 7 months ago
It's been mathematically proven that one nonexistent sci-fi ship could destroy another nonexistent sci-fi ship. The humanity!
Also no.
Bitemis 7 months ago
If the some of the computers can't hit the Defiant, how can they hit the Falcon (Defiant is larger)?
CaptRex501st 7 months ago
See, this is what happens when Han doesn't shoot first.
hafabee 11 months ago
HAN, NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! WHY??
Alexthegreatbelgian 11 months ago
So you are criticizing Star Wars and yet you use their effects?
FATE522 11 months ago
@FATE522 I'm not criticizing anyone, I simply took advantage of the fact I had Nichelle Nichols saying Millennium Falcon and William Shattner saying Star Wars? So I edited together a scene in which I could use both lines and have it make some sense. I love both Star Wars and Star Trek! I hope you enjoyed my little video!!
albion432 11 months ago 11
@albion432
No doubt I enjoyed it. :) It just appears that you are saying one is better than the other. :P But it is great to see you love both and I do to. :) Keep up the good work :)
FATE522 11 months ago
@albion432 yeah well the star wars line sounded like a diffrent person but still really awsome try :D
thewewguy8t88 1 month ago
Arm and lock photon/phasers on that heap of junk.
Mr. Sulu. FIRE!
STAR TREK RULES!
EmpireLS56KW 1 year ago
I feel sad don't get me wrong I love star trek but I love star wars to.
liongirlfc 1 year ago
the whole star wars universe would get owned by the borg. all they do is adapte and ansilmalte everything. including the death star :P owened
MrMewtwo213 1 year ago
N0000!!! HARRIS0N!! DX<
startrekgirl258 1 year ago
except the time frame for each vessel - is seperated by about 20,000 years ?
rentatrip1 1 year ago
i love the way he says 'STAR WARS?!'
BMWM3GTRLOVER 1 year ago
this was a awsome video , keep up the great work
erwintipton 1 year ago
It's been Mathmatically proven that a Simple X Wing could Destroy the Enterprise
lgmmrm 1 year ago
@lgmmrm I've got only two words to say about that . . . prove it!
albion432 1 year ago 21
Oh I know the PERFECT place where someone DID prove it. Beyond a shadow of a doubt in my opinion, and I AM the consummate Star Trek geek.
DestinedJedi87 1 year ago
@DestinedJedi87 I am the perfect Star Trek customer... not. I want everything in the Star Trek motive!!!
StelarCF 1 year ago
@albion432 I do like how Star Wars fans justify their stance by saying their statistical numbers are bigger.
"The Enterprise's shield output is 4 gigajoules, well, the tie-fighter's shield output is 4000 million trillion zillion!!!"
First of all, 2 can play that game with each side just increasing their numbers.
Second, I don't remember Lucas ever stating technical specifications
Third, they're in different realities! That's like comparing apples to... goombas!!!
liptonBlueBirdAdd 1 year ago
@albion432 prove it? 2+2x2=6!
2misterA 1 year ago
@2misterA oh yeah, well what about 1+1x1=2! Got ya there!
AnimalXTheAmazon 1 year ago
@AnimalXTheAmazon Oh Yeah, well 0+0x0=0 GOT YOU BOTH THERE!
lgmmrm 1 year ago
@albion432: Easy-peasy. Take one plastic toy, throw it at the other. That is all either ship is, a plastic toy.
VictorLepanto 2 months ago
@lgmmrm That seems illogical to me
guilhermefreire48 1 year ago
@lgmmrm except for two things you forgot. One we have the best shilds and two one blast from us and a stupid lone X wing would fail even to a simple lighsaber of which i could prove if you need me too.
Star Trek rules!!!!! Star Wars keeps repeating itself in different generations
BethVidz 1 year ago
@BethVidz listen, two words
Sun Crusher
two more words
Galaxy Gun
Two more words
Jedi Knight
lgmmrm 1 year ago
@lgmmrm I've got three words for that... Incorrect TOO INCORRECT
StelarCF 1 year ago
@lgmmrm how?!
keegan47401 1 year ago
@lgmmrm
Yeah your right... but only if the X wing ran into it! LOL
RDorthyWayneright 1 year ago
@lgmmrm Excuse me, but which Enterprise? There have been seven, The NX-01, NCC-1701,A,B,C,D and E. and remember each Enterprise was stronger and more powerful than the one before it, with better Shields, Phasers and Torpedo capabilities. Not to mention better Warp Drives that can work in close quarters (Picard Manouver) as opposed to hyper drives which are only good for long distance travel.
rebel1701 5 months ago
@rebel1701 I believe it was D (It was picards ship for most of TNG)
lgmmrm 5 months ago
@lgmmrm so it has been mathmatically proven that the Starship U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D Galaxy Class, which could run rings around all the previous starships named Enterprise, could be beaten easily by an X wing? Sorry but NO CHANCE. Remember the Enterprise D does have saucer Seperation, making it effectively TWO (2) ships verses ONE (1) X-wing. What I was meaning was which Enterprise could an X-Wing destroy easily? Archer's NX-01, Maby. NOT the D.
rebel1701 5 months ago
@lgmmrm How? Both of them are works of fiction! What you said is just as stupidly inane as saying it's been genetically proven that Wookies are stronger than Klingons.
Get off your chair, leave your room, go outside, get a life!
VinnyMonster1 4 months ago
@VinnyMonster1 both filmmakers have books that have power outputs and shielding and all that shit, both franchises go so far into it that they have the numbers and.. well, you get it..
lgmmrm 4 months ago
@lgmmrm But it's all imaginary! You can't prove an imaginary thing with mathematics!
Ultimately, this is just like the numerous 'which superhero is the best' arguments.
And I strongly suspect that the producers of the Star Wars tech manuals and what have you decided that their gear would be more powerful than Trek gear. Either way, it's a 5 year old's argument. The only thing that is of any importance is the quality of the shows and/or movies.
VinnyMonster1 4 months ago
@VinnyMonster1 Yes you can prove an imaginary thing with mathematics. I forget if it was the asteroid belt or Pluto. Unfortunately, after you prove something it's no longer imaginary.
UglySean 4 months ago
@UglySean The Asteroid Belt and Pluto are not imaginary. You're talking about proving a hypothetical or a theoretical thing, which is entirely different. Let me put it another way. You can't prove a fictional thing with mathematics because it does not exist. The Star Trek and the Star Wars universe do not exist, therefore nothing within them can be proven mathematically.
End of the day, does it really matter which fictional universe has the bigger and/or better stuff?
VinnyMonster1 4 months ago
@VinnyMonster1 What I am saying is that at one time the Asteroids and Pluto WERE hypothetical concepts because they hadn't been discovered yet. One, maybe bother were first theorized using mathematics. I think it was the asteroids because due to some yahoo's math there had to be something between Mars and Jupiter. Until that time its existence was hypothetical as far as Earthlings were concerned. Same with alleged planets beyond Pluto or Mercury. Imaginary until proven real.
UglySean 4 months ago
@UglySean Not imaginary, hypothetical. There is evidence that suggests they're there. Imaginary means that somebody just dreamed stuff up.
VinnyMonster1 4 months ago
@lgmmrm but a star destroyer not
Berryverwijk 2 months ago
@lgmmrm
not an X-wing but the falcon could destroy it real easy just with the rail guns.
Bugsy150 2 months ago
A Star Wars fan and a Star Trek fan walk into a bar...
thepriest314 1 year ago
That was stupid.
Jonah64100 1 year ago
very funny but the Falcon would wipe the Enterprise from the stars, they MIGHT not have as much firepower but the Falcon could outmaneuver the Enterprise and it's weaponry with little effort......
still a funny clip though! As long as everyone realizes that the Falcon would totally win.... with no contest....... whatsoever......
sonicsnout 1 year ago
the way Kirk say's Star Wars LOL
paranoidpfanclub 1 year ago
yea the millenium falcon would wipe the voyager form totally exsistence.
Evan858 1 year ago
HaaHaa!! That was great. Terriffic upload. 5 stars man.
jayce79 1 year ago
@albion432 yeah so i guess that means that in the star wars "universe" the enterprise vs star wars ships (during time of enterprise is built) would be like sticks vs nuclear weapons (because if they had that type of tech long ago imagine what they would have now) and the millenium falcon would b a totally outdated piece of junk
fagonfly 1 year ago
a couple of shots of Millenium Falcons weapons would be enough to destroy the Enterprise
Delta2357 1 year ago
Wow a verbal war between Star Wars Nerds and Trekies (SuperNerds) baaaaahhahahahahaha no wonder you guys are the butt of countless jokes!!!!! ROFLMAO
shoe2522 1 year ago
No there from two diffrent galxys. learn your trek fool
MajoraProject 1 year ago
Being that they come from two different universes, I would say that they're not comparable.
darthluna001 1 year ago
@darthluna001 No there from two diffrent galxys. learn your trek fool
MajoraProject 1 year ago
@MajoraProject
By universes, I referred to the English use of the word. I know they're two different galaxies.
darthluna001 1 year ago
@darthluna001 and don't forget they come from two different time periods too . . . one long ago and the other about 250 years in the future.
albion432 1 year ago
@albion432 You need to consider the possabliity of time travel.
ScrapGoldBass 1 year ago
most ships in star wars could kick the enterprise's ass. like star destroyers, mon calimari cruisers, venator cruisers, executor SSD, eclipse SSD (no chance the enterprise could beat the eclipse or executor. and if u dont no wat it is then look it up), ect. star wars ships r jus bettr. but the millenium falcon would probably lose 2 the enterprise
fagonfly 1 year ago 3
@fagonfly Millenium Falcon is just a freighter. But Han probably could outrun them!
steffer234 1 year ago
Hmm...the Constitution is an outdated hunk of junk...and the Millenium Falcon is an outdated hunk of junk. This would be close.
But then, the Enterprise is bigger, and has a larger crew. Phasers are probably more powerful too. The Falcon's a souped up medium freighter with a few plasma guns and small missles strapped onto it. I'd say the Enterprise would win, if they fought that is.
Can't they just get along? :-)
kvn8907 1 year ago
everyone just stfu ok? there is not a better ship. in the case of a battle the falcon couldnt damage the enterprise and the enterprise couldnt hit the falcon. its a stalemate.
ToxicTaxonJunior 1 year ago
star trek is better
Starryvideos 2 years ago
okay look, the millenium falcon could totally outmanuver the enterprise. they have better gunners and shields to hold up against a star destroyer! no way the star trek guys would win
FluffyFeralMarmot 2 years ago
With the special effects of the 1960s, theoretically, yes. However, if I remember right, the technology (warp / hyper speed ) is about the same. While the Falcon is more maneuverable at first glance because it is a crap load smaller, the Enterprise is no slouch itself. It'd give Sulu would give Solo a run for his money ! *giggles*
subaruandseishiro 2 years ago
thats true but there is no way a ship could fly like the millenium falcon. Their way of flying is like airplanes of ww2. there is no way a ship could do those manuveuers. As for a star destroyer. If they eat 5 photon torpedoes in the bridge we will see who is the best. As far as i remember star trek ships have adjustable shields. A star destroyer doesnt. Without mention the cloaking ability of the birds of pray.
Ulver27 2 years ago
are you high? the millenium falcon is not an airplane!!! this is space where there are light sabers and talking robots, don't tell me they can't fly. and the enterprise does not have a cloaking device
FluffyFeralMarmot 2 years ago
maybe there will be a time when light sabers will be developed. We are already living in a time were robots are talking. But there will never be a time that spaceships will be able to fly and manuveuer like millenium falcon. Its against phycics. in star wars the ships make turns that need gravity. but there is no gravity in space. If you can read you will find out that i was talking about the cloaking ability not of the enterprise but of the BIRDS OF PRAY.
Ulver27 2 years ago
prey
Ulver27 2 years ago
@FluffyFeralMarmot the millenium falcon would be destroyed even by the Botany Bay LOL
sondano 1 year ago
Oh well.....this was bound to happen sooner or later.
Delisle4 2 years ago
I'm a Trek Wars fan! They both rock!
SweeneyGirl310593 2 years ago 13
name ONE way enterprise would win. falcon shields and firepower > enterprise shields and firepower. and dont try the size thing. yoda was tiny and he reached age 900. the death star 2 was huge and it lasted 3 years.
and sw proton torpedos have 150 megaton shaped charges, so all 150 megatons are used. st photon torpedos have 48 megaton normal charges so only 24 megatons is used, the rest dissipates into space.
fajner1 2 years ago
Star Trek > Star Wars
rissaxcantxdance 2 years ago
Star wars has more true and logical science in it. It leaves you with less guessing.
acco8675309 2 years ago
Please, the entire original trilogy associates the force as a spiritual/mental growth obtained through rigorous mental focus and exercise. The newer half refutes everything substantiated in those films by saying that the force is governed by magical creatures in your body.
It's all fiction based on science...Thus the tag 'science fiction.'
5anjii 2 years ago
Not really thinking about that. The light sabers and blasters are both ran by ozone. I'm working on figuring out what the phaser thingys are. I'm a huge fan of either one so I'm not going to go into a huger report about engines and stuff cause I'm not a huge fan of either one, but that's what I mean. Of course the whole force thing is bs but so is spok's mindmelding and shoulder pinch. I just think star wars has a bit more science in it. I think they made a special on it.
acco8675309 2 years ago
Plus It's quite refreshing that not all of the aliens look like humans with make up in star wars.
acco8675309 2 years ago 2
Um no, midichlorians are the result of and not the cause of the force.
Even Wookies have them, and not all wookies are force sensitives.
Correct science FICTION, is just that fiction, which also includes star trek B5 and BSG.
blacksun2175 2 years ago
Then why drag 'real' science into it? Everyone knows that star trek is just a bunch of fictional jargon...Avoiding the jargon doesn't make Star Wars any more or less 'real' it just means theres less emphasis.
I'll agree to disagree with your assertion that the force creates midichlorians...I am admittingly not the biggest Star Wars fan (although I do enjoy the films) I am just going off of my own interpretations of the prequels.
At any rate, I'm not trying to start a fight or anything.
5anjii 2 years ago
I didn't mention real science. Never said one was more realistic than the other either.
Look up midichlorians on a wiki, they don't cause the force they are just found in greater numbers in force sensitives.
While you're at it wiki the force.
blacksun2175 2 years ago
You said true science. Sorry, I assumed true=real. I think that's a fair assumption on my part.
5anjii 2 years ago
What are you talking about?
I just looked back 2 years worth of posts on this video...
I never once mentioned REAL science in any of my arguments.
blacksun2175 2 years ago
Hmm, sorry my original reply was to Acco. I wasn't even talking to you, you just jumped in and I didn't notice. My fault.
My original post was just a rebuttle to Acco for him saying that Star Wars has more 'true' science, which I think is absolutely ridiculous. I wasn't bashing Star Wars.
5anjii 2 years ago
Yeah that seems to happen a lot on youtube.
Water under the bridge.
blacksun2175 2 years ago
Oh really? Then explain how a farm boy with about as much mental focus as is necessary to wank himself can be as powerful as Vader with about a week of training...
drewmandan 2 years ago
Because he was the chosen one, you moron. He finished the basic jedi training, and only defeated vader because he was his son and vader had doubts about killing him.
Vader was holding back, because the emperor said he was going to intervene if things went awry, of course that was a lie.
Did you even pay attention to the movies?
blacksun2175 2 years ago
Yeah I'm pretty sure that the enire original trilogy pretty much went on and on about how luke was the chosen one, hero of the rebellion and son of one of the most powerful jedi to have ever lived.
A skilled bush pilot, who practiced racing in beggars canyon and bulleying 1-2 meter womp rats manually.
You would REALLY have to be pretty dense if you missed that.
blacksun2175 2 years ago
those fucking bastards!
lowenjennings 2 years ago 3
Nooooo,you just killed Han Solo,damn you,Kirk!!!
Springmaus2007 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
i do think star trek is much better than star wars
Deep1Purple2 2 years ago 5
that was soo funny!! XD but geez guys, can't star wars and star trek just get along? they are both amazing!
PrincessFiana 2 years ago 31
@PrincessFiana NO!
Star Wars=wars wars wars WTF
Star Trek= Trek Trek Trek EXPLORE
StelarCF 1 year ago
@PrincessFiana Lighten up the user only made it for a piss take. I like both STAR TREK and (STAR WARS originals only).
EmpireLS56KW 1 year ago
@PrincessFiana As long as people can agree they're not the same type of amazing, and as long as we don't get a Star Wars movie which is only pretending to be Star Trek *cough*ST09*cough*
StoneKnivesBearskins 8 months ago
WTF
Flybyhacker 2 years ago 4
OMFG O_O !!!!!!!!!!!!
aandoraa 2 years ago
Yeah Star Trek kicks Star Wars' ass!
MrCoolVermonterblade 2 years ago 6
Check out KIRK VS THE ROADRUNNER
ScrapGoldBass 2 years ago
No.
DaibloDBZ 2 years ago 3
NERD FIGHT! xD sry guys no offense..
MatuSSisko 2 years ago 5
I wanna see a Boba Fett/Spock conversation.
RabbitDance 2 years ago 4
Han would have outmaneuvered them easily, by listing lazily to the left. ^^ Kirk just wishes he could destroy the Falcon.
DarthxxRane 2 years ago 3
that was on family guy. lol
johndnumber3 2 years ago
yeah go star trek. Wars is lite stuff compared to trek.
hoppers001 2 years ago
That my friend, is where you are so wrong.
Silverterror 2 years ago 6
did you just say F me. Oh no you didn't. How do you know the enterprise couldn't go up on a vertical climb. it was done in star trek II. Slave 1 is not a capital ship in wars, it can be beat by the enterprise..
hoppers001 2 years ago
STAR WARS!?
john6380 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lets see Kirk fire on Slave I and see what Boba Fett does to his faggot star trek ass, thou shall not fuck with a Mandolorian.
crazyeyes1977 2 years ago
no the enterprise would withstand full laser barrage from the slave 1's lasers. (I'm ignoring the star wars technical manual for you warsies) As for those depth charges he has the enterprise can simple just go up on a vertical climb and avoid it. The Enterprise fires torpedoes and boom bye bye boba fett. :)
hoppers001 2 years ago
yeahh fuck you millennium falcon enterprise would kick your ass any day.
Pwnagemerchant 3 years ago
LMAO! I'm a Star Wars fan and I found that incredibly funny! Though I do have a soft spot for Star Trek: The Original Series.
linkieloos 3 years ago 2
F Star Wars.
Xero328 3 years ago
F you!
Silverterror 2 years ago 2
I know where the sound of Shatner saying "Star WARS?!" comes from, but where does Uhura's line come from?
McSwan1 3 years ago 4
Uhura's line comes from the audio book version of "The Nitpickers Guide to Classic Star Trek" and was in reference to an actor in the episode "The Enemy Within" calling Sulu "Solo". That line was actually the insperation behind the whole edit, I just had to use it somehow! Thanks for asking!
albion432 3 years ago
Thank You.
McSwan1 3 years ago 3
Star Trek is the only joy in existence.
Goldorak6 3 years ago 26
true!
violatress 3 years ago 2
Kirk must really HATE Star Wars lol.
EarthBolt100 3 years ago 3
@EarthBolt100 Like Kirk, I too HATE Star Wars!
MrOdyssey1999 1 year ago
NICE
floydthebarber999 3 years ago
"Kirk orders Sulu to open fire on the Millenium Falcon only after he learns it's from Star Wars . . . "
Hey, after the prequels, can you blame him?
Potrimpo 3 years ago
BUT some could argue that vise versa.
Potrimpo 3 years ago
Oh come on now
I'm a fan of both and the Enterprise wouldn't fire at the falcon and Han would get that ship out of there
Wheeljack35 3 years ago
I agree with the first point, but I'm afraid that Han's hyperdrive would probably pick that moment to malfunction.
MarkVIILSC 3 years ago 4
the enterprise would not fire unless they were trying to defend themselves.
trekkeralex 3 years ago
It's just a joke. Lighten up!
TheREALforeverone 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh noo! star wars rocks star trek
Eddifrillson 3 years ago
YAH, take that Star Wars
texassteak 4 years ago
@texassteak I agree, thgis serves Star Wars right for its snobbery!
MrOdyssey1999 1 year ago
lol
alphathewolf 4 years ago
yeah right.
mayyn94 4 years ago
btw. Ion Propulsion has been around for a while, but Star Trek was the first to make reference to it.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
Well, after all the Enterprise or any weapon's capable ship in Star Trek could take the Millenium Falcon.
Airportchris2 4 years ago 2
Bwahahaha! Riiiiiiiiight.
FMAfan241 4 years ago
The Enterprise is considored a battle cruiser, its size may be smaller, than the outragiously sized Star Wars vessels, but the smaller size makes for more maneuverability.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
Right. The pathetically slow Fed ships.
FMAfan241 4 years ago
Actually, Star Trek ships can reach Warp 9.99, which is Almost 10 times the speed of light, and some have been modified to travel faster.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
I mean slow in sublight. Besides, Hyperdrive is much faster. Much more than ten times c.
FMAfan241 4 years ago
Full impulse, is traveling just under the speed of light. Warp 10 is considered in Star Trek is at which point you can be going so fast, you can be anywhere at anytime.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
With Ward 9 being way under that? So it randomly jumps from very slow to very fast?
FMAfan241 4 years ago
No most star trek ships have a maximum of warp 9.99, but they have increasing from there, ex. stopped, 1/2 impulse, full impulse, warp 1, 2, and so on. When the ship passes its maximum speed, which usually is Warp 10, its considored to be going so fast, it is basically traversing time, b/c it can be anywhere at any time.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
They rarely use time travel, though. Only when the time line is endangered. Like when Nazis won WWII.
FMAfan241 4 years ago
In star trek, they use it in countless eps, and movies.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
Let me say it again, try to put in your head.
'THEY ONLY USE IT WHEN THE TIME LINE IS ENDANGERED!'
They have never used it in a war situation.
FMAfan241 4 years ago
yea, well never had to use it for that.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
One I know of is when somebody gave Nazis in WWII the tech of the 24th century, and they took over the world.
FMAfan241 4 years ago
That was a ep of Enterprise.
Airportchris2 4 years ago
It was? I though it was TNG or Voyager or some other series.
FMAfan241 4 years ago