why pple get so romantic about all that time travel stuff for me its very simple!time travel to the past on the same dimension of the same universe is plausible but practly imposiible= you ne unimaginably huge amounds of energy to reverse every movement of every atom (for example in earth)in order to reset it to its original position at the desired date you like to reanimate(even if it was possible to control that force and be able to think of a way to nanipulate atoms indvidually.. {continues}
@Emeengor {continuing from post 1}.... manipulate atoms indvidually you have to know ALL the atoms original location on the desired date) there is no other way to achieve TEH END! leave with it.... it could be possible (just for the sake of imagination ) to travel through other dimensions in which we could see the past (assuming other dimensions evolve EXACTLY as ours and that the universe of that dimension started to expand in absolute time later than ours so to put it simple {continues}
@Emeengor {continuing from post 2}..... in absolute time later than ours so to put it simple when its 2012 in our dimension its lets say 1999 in 'their' dimension) but again no paradox should arise since if for example you inform the ppl from USA that they gonna have a terrorist attack then youll change only their future choices... when you return in our dimension the two tower would keep to be history...) thats it so simple.
Time-travel speculation often omits: To return to a place in time on Earth also requires returning to a place in space. Effective time-travel must necessarily include space travel & incredibly complex calculations of positions in space-time.
Although nothing at the quantum level prohibits time moving backwards, macro events would be very difficult to predict, much less control.
That's one reason your time-twin could not arrive.
Another is, time-travel may not be invented in your lifetime.
Thank you, hardly anyone gets this: if, somehow, one could travel through time, and decided to travel to the same location one day in the past, you would 'appear' in outer space, because the planet wasn't there one day ago.
High-school level physics can defeat most of the pseudo-science you see/hear every day. Rule of cool, right?
@p34cekeeper lol yeah but simple co-ordinates solves this problem, the problem of time travel makes this small obstacle insignificant.
Just to add to it though, not only does the point of the materialization or portal need to be addressed but also perhaps the speed at which the planet moves and in what direction it is travelling in relation to the speed and direction of whatever is being transported through time.
@p34cekeeper A man, on earth, which is travelling from A to B must be oriented correctly when being transported through time. Otherrwise, even if the point of entry was correct, if the man did not have the same momentum AND in the same direction as the planet, then... SPLAT!
That's a good point, but I would argue that the coordinate problem is far from simple: which reference frame do you use? All of the bodies and systems in the universe oscillate constantly in relation to eachother, so to mathematically predict the position of the earth 1,000,000 years ago, you would have to account for the influence of an enormous number of planetary, solar, and extra-solar events.
Yo Molly, I think Everetts Many-Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics solves this paradox in a neat way. You are never in the same universe when you time travel... there is a world for every possibility. Max Tegmark at MIT is the leading expert at the time being :)
The Nerd Paradox: Everyone watching this video is a nerd, and knows about quantum leap, back to the future, star trek and every other show with time travel paradoxes. Therefore just by making a video on this topic to inform people, you are ensuring that no one who watches it will learn anything. Apparently the solution to the nerd paradox is cuteness. Try having Janet Reno make this video. If you watched it, which you wouldnt, it would only have 1 view, yours.
@Jantles I've created a machine that allows you to travel forward in time. It's called the Bacon Cheeseburger. It allows you to travel forwards in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
But if somehow time travel were possible at some point and people did start doing things like marty mcfly did would it not be fine as these alterations have always happened and have never changed as we think we have changed them as they have always been there , changed. i.e chuck berry knew about the song as marty played it in the 50's THEN marty learnt it in the 80's befor he went back in time
If a collage of past , present and future events can appear in the mind, , seeing that the methodology of the mind, must apply universally to all Nature, then in some place in the tangible universe , events must have tangential effects of meeting somewhere, and sharing the affluence of past , present or future events. One example is in the black hole, all the distance created by time is squeezed out. So if the Mind can time travel, Nature must already be able to time travel as well.
When a past event is packaged to unravel with a determinable affluence in a future time, then that is time travel using Nature. For a future event to change the past, requires multiple universes, but we should not forget how the Free Will is able to detach itself from Nature and act as a radical. Thus, when ancient people behave as if in their mind, they know the future, and their prognostication affects their present actions, such future has in fact altered the past, using the Mind.
i believe 'aliens' are actually time travellers. that's why they always look humanoid when reported, and why they make minimal contact; to avoid messing up the past/present/future.
If time travel is possible there would be time travelers outside now and very very early on. If time continues that means that a time machine must have been created already in the future during our time so I'm expecting to already see time travelers. Since there aren't any sadly that means there is no such thing and we will never invent one ever because there isn't a time traveler here now. Unless the future people traveling back now know how to travel in another dimension we cannot see.
@Sw155, If you really want to nail women on YouTube through lame commentage, you really ought to nail their accents to within a hemisphere and a couple of oceans.
@loqiloqi alright mr. linguistics major, hope that's working out for you :) in the world i live in, i gotta keep my pimp hand strong and shit on bitches.
Someone else made it to begin with.. She then explained it to her previous self before it was ever invented, then she invents it, so she basically stole the idea from whoever the original inventor was, he was the one to originally invent it.
The way I see it, a paradox could actually cause a paradox, or it could cause an alternate timeline, one wich would be escapable only by traveling BACK into time, then traveling forward, BEFORE the past you shows up to creat the alternate timeline in the first place, thereby making your past self the one stuck in the other TL, alteast untill HE (or she) does what you did and becomes the you of now.
Time and space are one thing. You cannot move your space without having time in which to do it. So going back in time must result in you going back in space, correct? But what does that mean? When youre done time traveling will you be in the place you were at that time? What if you back before you were born? Maybe the farther back you go the more parallel universes you skip over until you land in one. But if parallel universes are in different places from our own, can't we travel to them foward?
He explains the paradox of time travel doesn't necessarily have to form a loop of time. The theory can work using parallel universes where for example, this universe we live in can never have it's time changed. Otherwise it would have happened. But we could travel to another universe that is 10 years behind and our journey would be written there.
the real paradox is, if I am not having sex with you now, and I am raping you in the future, does that mean I will have raped you in the past as well?
it could be a kasiber ring a simple recuring sequence that produces product.
the action of preinvention could be the constuctive sequence as opposed to invention and the memory could in fact become or have been the result of the action ipmrinted on your head:as memories are often completly incorect or are confused with imagination.
none of this is relevent time travel is permanently impossible.
Simple. You can only travel in time from the moment a time machine is discovered onwards. You can't go back to a time before time machines were invented.
But this constructive cridisum I will use the back to the future thing. Marty remembered the song when he went back he told his memory so it still came from the first guy it just was introduced earlier then it would have originally there for if it was remembered there he would know the true orjin and every one elce would think diferantly
As long as you travel back to a place that are farther away from your current position in space time than it takes light to travel from the gate to the destination, you're perfectly fine. But that means also the result is completely unpredictable, you could easily end up in an alternative universe. And how can you know about a place you don't have information about?
look up the delayed quantum choice experiment, one of the findings is that present observations are affected by future choices (choices which havn't been made yet).
The only way to cure paradoxes is to introduce the idea of parallel universes. The guy in the opening scene of 'Slacker' is basically stating what happens with the PU theory but is implying they only come into existence when there is a choice. In my opinion PUs are 100% there, that means that, if they are, EVERYTHING has happened, is happening, or will happen within the laws of that particular universe, therefore everything has happened an infinite amount of times and that cures paradoxes.
How about the Terminator? Kyle goes back in time to before the machines, but a Terminator machine follows him, and after the final battle only its arm is left, which some guys at that company use to build a machine, which later one of those versions follows Kyle Reese back in time, only to be destroyed and have its arm used to make a machine which goes back in time, gets destroyed, then rebuilt to go back and get destroyed to be rebuilt and get destroyed and rebuilt and destroyed andregoigerokhh
Im anoyed, being a time traveler myself. when you go to the past you go there as you were at that point in time, but if you explained how to make a time machine you dont mess anything up, even if you go forward in time to where you were after going through, you were in a diffrent dimention. every Google of a second (1 with 100 zeros behind it) makes a new dimention and makes it so you cant mess shit up. its easy to explain as a tree diagram
another solution: there is no time. time is an invention by humans. We measure it using quite different methods. if you believe the theory of relativity, time cant be measured uniformly because it passes with different speeds in different interial reference frame.
so if time is only a tool, used by humans to help imagine the world, how can we explain time passing? simple: the world develops and as it does, we see it change.
@SebastianMisch so if for instance a stone falls down a tower. but have you seen a stone fall up the tower? i havent. so why would there be something like moving backwards in time? thats what the analogy would be. moving backwards in time = the stone falling back up the tower.
I've dedicated my life to a time travel experiment. I know that time travel isn't possible, because if it was I would have come back and prevented myself from marrying my ex wife.
@alueshen Well, let's just assume that either your future self could only achieve time travel due to said ex-wife. If he came back to stop the marriage, you would never one day invent time travel allowing you to come back and stop the marriage which.. etc
If you say (to prove time travel does not exist) "when time travel is possible i will come back to this moment to see myself", it does not prove anything because would you really remember in the future maybe 50+ years from now that you must go back in time to the exact second when you said that statement? im not saying its possible, its just a flaw in that "experiment"
time travel is possible... you're doing it right now. as for going back in time and killing mom... you're a sick bastard, also once an item comes into being it exists in at least one of the multiverses, and will thus always exist. any means of time travel other than the natural progression we experience as a result of spacial expansion will likely involve interaction with other multiverses. so it's more accurate to describe time travel as travel between multiverses or intradimensional travel
This can also be demonstrated in Legend Of Zelda, Ocarina of Time. In the Future, when you are adult link, you learn the Song of Storms from Tingle. Then, you travel back in time to teach tingle the song, so he can learn it and teach it to you in the future, and then yapp blah bluh bluh Paradox.
if you went back in time and killed yourself wouldn't you be dead already? so you couldn't kill yourself and the you in the past would randomly die. right?
@17zambre I can solve the paradox of time travel. It is similar to the solution at 2:14, but it doesn't say that there is a parallel universe where you just raped someone.
Bare with me but if you went forward in time and killed yourself would that not mean you live forever? Because you kill your older self then when you grow up you get killed by yourself so theres always a version of you in existence!
Johnny B. Goode is a perfect piece of music, and if you can imagine such a piece to exist, it must exist, regardless of whether or not someone wrote it...
Going back through time is'nt possible, going forward might be though... if we could bring human to speed approaching (0,99xx times) the speed of light ( witch we are ridiculously far from doing but stil ... in space with no friction ... it might be possible ... ) then time for this person would be considerebly slowed down ... so they would come back in a year, but on earth a couple year might have passed by ...
Going back through time being impossible dosnt imply that going forward isnt ....
@659851 Why do you think traveling back in time is impossible? If you believe in general relativity, you believe traveling BACK in time isn't impossible.
How would it be possible using relativity to go back through time ?? And what do you mean ''if you believe in relativity.'' ?? this is a proven theory, I've worked with it, it's used in many applications ... Why or how could one ''not believe'' it ??
Anyway, if you happen to know theoreticaly how it would be possible i'd like to know about it !! I know going forward would be if we had the technology .. But back i just dont see a way !
1- I just dont see a way even theoreticaly for it to be possible ( with does not mean it isnt but ... you know ... I quite scientificaly up to date and so for nothing half descent has come up to suggest we can even think about it)
2- The hole argument that this video demonstrates. Lets say you go back and kill your mother... You could not have existed to kill her This opens the door for this that just cant happen !!
2- When you go back, you enter a new timeline and there's TWO places for 1980 when you kill your mother: one where she lives to create you and one where you kill her
It may not sound scientific but I agree with this and there's a lot of details that need a lot more then 500 characters. And my computer is running slow. I know people who don't believe in relativity, look up "Length contraction debunked". I think non-relativists are quite stupid.
Yeah !! I get the wormhole point. but the thing is, we havnt seen a worm hole yet, we dont even know they exist! They are still a product of physician's mental masturbation !! Although very interesting I gota say !! So.. I get your point but this does not make it ''possible'' in my mind yet !
It's about the same thing for the multi universe argument, intersting mental masturbation but we dont have nothing to suggest it makes sens!
the answer to this Paradox is easy. and the answer is Multiversum! :D
everytime u chance the History, u kreate a new Universe where the new Timeline is the only one truse. but u can not return to our Home universe, cause u can´t make the chance undone without making new chances.maybe u wanna try out Sthepen Baxter´s "the Timeships" he explainse the whole thing pretty good. and its a funny book to read :)
@Zombiepull The big problem with your theory is that we don't have free will. There's nothing that makes our brains so special that our choices would create entire new universes: they're chemistry.
It would also mean that our choices would be random, since every choice will be made in multiple ways, chance dictates that we are most likely to be in a universe where are choices seem random, since, according to you, our choices are just random coin flips that create universes.
@MrDjwithers Yes it is our free will, but not entirely. We are influenced by everyone and everything around us, and every one of our decisions is made from an emotional response. Such as taking the shortcut, you want to get home and do what ever you want to quicker. Because you have the emotion of desire for whatever the activity you want to do at home. Everything is chosen due to emotional responses.
@Skillerguy45 but you can choose to ignore those emotions and do something else
for example say you want to kill someone and your about to hurt that person but you choose to ignore the anger and hate and you forgive and dont kill the person.
@MrDjwithers Haha, I like how your thinking but it's deeper than that. Don't give me shit because it has been proven. In a car crash a man lost the side of his brain that controls emotions. Everything else was fine, but he could not make decisions. Even basic things too. And your example of killing someone you do not kill them because the fear of getting caught is overpowering to the other.
@MrDjwithers No, our surroundings and the structure of our brains are the only things that determine what we choose. If we choose to disobey God (however you want to call it), it's because our brain isn't satisfied with the information it gets from our surrounding (in my case that would be evidence that is required for a God).
I don't see why free will is required. On top of that, you're appealing to consequences: it doesn't matter what the lack of free will implies for your untestable faith.
@Skillerguy45 "Yes it is our free will" - Skillerguy45
You believe in free will.
Prepare for a debate to the death, my friend.
Just kidding :D It's kind of fun to discuss free will, because a lot of people don't have a clue and are like "If I WANTED I could do X" then explaining that that is not proof of free will, and that free will is logically impossible in layman terms is kinda hard, too.
Anyway, have a nice day and discussion with Mr WIthers.
@Thunderios :P yeah, "Yes it is our free will" I mean it in the way that it is us that makes the decision but the decision is influenced by everything around us and our emotions. Some people (Not mentioning names...*cough* *cough*) don't think of emotions deep enough.
@Skillerguy45 OK one why you being a cunt and wont see the lodgic to anything? oh wait cause deep down you know God is real your just too afraid to say cause you wanna impress people on the internet
@MrDjwithers Dude calm down. I said that reply as a joke to Thunderios. Learn how to spell logic and you are just a troll. I throw logic at you. It's like throwing a sandwich at a brick wall. It won't do anything and I've wasted my time making a decent sandwich. Nice reply of swearing blindly. This is an argument not relating to religion, but if you must know I am an Atheist. I hope you don't behave like this in real life kid.
@MrDjwithers I was trying to be serious, but now you blew it. I thought you were a decent person who wanted to know the truth and therefore would meet others and discuss the big questions in life. In stead you seem to be a person that gets angry when people aren't convinced by their argument (and with reason, too!).
And then you make the worst argument ever. Please, you must know this is the biggest pile of bullshit anyone ever thought up. I'm sorry I thought you were worth it...
@MrDjwithers Actually, I think the only lie you've told is this comment. Most people believe in free will because the illusion is so strong, and their objectivity so weak. Your response has been the usual one, so I am rather certain you were being honest. Until you got angry, and fuck around because you're on the internet anyway, and actions don't have consequences.
@1acroyear1 you are wrong, there a numerous studies showing how an atom can be two places at the same time. Look in to string theory and the double slit experiment.
@mkno79 String theory isn't really relevant to those quantum phenomena. The double slit experiment merely shows that matter has a wave property. Eventually we resolved the problem with making the whole particle a wave of probability, where, when it has to react to something, it 'chooses' a position randomly. So it's not in two places at once, it isn't in a position, just within a certain boundary with a certain chance.
The time machine was invented by Dr. Emmett Brown in Hill Valley, California in 1985. He used a DeLorean and a flux capacitor to make the machine work.
Dear Molly, you're hot. I'm having unspeakable thoughts about you. I don't want a relationship, I just want to borrow you for an hour or so for a jam session.
one person has ever time travelled into the past. He was in one of the space stations for like a couple of years and therefor has experienced 0.02 seconds less then everyone on earth
@spikycactus777 thats what I said 0.02 seconds less is 0.02 seconds before. He'd be in 0.02 seconds before everone else because he has experienced 0.02 seconds less then anyone else
The Yes and No Paradox: Suppose your parents go out for dinner, and to travel, they use their Ford Explorer. However, in your garage remains the second car. Imagine its a Toyota Corolla. As time passes you worry about yor parents that are not coming back and realise that the only car that could be them is the Ford Explorer. Later on your parents come back in the exact same Corolla car you still have on your garage. This says that your parents travelled back in time and used the Corolla to travel
When one travels back in time, the point of re-entry creates a new time line. The new time-line is unbounded. Chuck Berry wrote Johnny B Good in time-line #1 and then Marty taught it to Chuck Berry in time-line #2. The two time-lines exist as parallel universes. Once you leave a time-line, you can never return to it.
Since current is shaped out of the past, if a syndicate (of everybody i hope) could control every movement that is in our dimension of time, and then just trail on the past, everybody would be brought to the exact copy of the past.
Motion is relative, as is time, matter, and energy. Theoretically, If one were able to travel faster than the speed of light(though this would require an infinite amount of energy to propel a particle as it approaches infinite mass) then one would travel back in time. However, I think this time travel will only be relative to the time traveler, that is, he would experience the past, but have no effect on the "real" past that people going less than the speed of light experienced.
In back to the future, the time line is changed. At the end, their whole life is changed. It's only reasonable to assume that they also changed other parts of the time line when they went back in time. In this case, instead of Chuck Berry writing the song himself, he hears Marty play it. So Chuck Berry is still the original creator.
In thought experiments time travel is possible, because time machines would be like phones. You can't phone someone if only one phone exists, you need another phone to call up.
In the same way you need a phone somewhere else, you'd need a time portal some*when* else to go to reach a different time.
This proves that time machines that go BACK in time will never be made. Not just because of the Parodoxes but a really old lady would have showed up instead of young molly....
Time travel may be more like "Time line" travel it's not that you travel though time but parallel earths. There may possibly be infinite earth time lines that which you change your vibratory frequency to match the preferred time line instead of the earth changing for you. That could be like how people say the law of attraction is great of manifesting what you want in your life, but really your tapping into a parallel earth when that certain thing was available to you?
shes beautiful
RaikenXion 2 days ago
so...hot...
MrCrushus 2 days ago
your hot.... travel to me
lonestar2779 1 week ago
@lonestar2779 no ring either, so your free :)
lonestar2779 1 week ago
why pple get so romantic about all that time travel stuff for me its very simple!time travel to the past on the same dimension of the same universe is plausible but practly imposiible= you ne unimaginably huge amounds of energy to reverse every movement of every atom (for example in earth)in order to reset it to its original position at the desired date you like to reanimate(even if it was possible to control that force and be able to think of a way to nanipulate atoms indvidually.. {continues}
Emeengor 1 week ago
@Emeengor {continuing from post 1}.... manipulate atoms indvidually you have to know ALL the atoms original location on the desired date) there is no other way to achieve TEH END! leave with it.... it could be possible (just for the sake of imagination ) to travel through other dimensions in which we could see the past (assuming other dimensions evolve EXACTLY as ours and that the universe of that dimension started to expand in absolute time later than ours so to put it simple {continues}
Emeengor 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Emeengor {continuing from post 2}..... in absolute time later than ours so to put it simple when its 2012 in our dimension its lets say 1999 in 'their' dimension) but again no paradox should arise since if for example you inform the ppl from USA that they gonna have a terrorist attack then youll change only their future choices... when you return in our dimension the two tower would keep to be history...) thats it so simple.
Emeengor 1 week ago
time travel is possible, but nobody is stupid enough to try it. Einstein Rosen-Bridge (blank holes).
sindrow6 1 week ago
Touche!' pmsl xxxxxx
Dicky2219 2 weeks ago
She is the one...
tonkrogerio 2 weeks ago
Time-travel speculation often omits: To return to a place in time on Earth also requires returning to a place in space. Effective time-travel must necessarily include space travel & incredibly complex calculations of positions in space-time.
Although nothing at the quantum level prohibits time moving backwards, macro events would be very difficult to predict, much less control.
That's one reason your time-twin could not arrive.
Another is, time-travel may not be invented in your lifetime.
OldSchoolSkill 2 weeks ago
@OldSchoolSkill
Thank you, hardly anyone gets this: if, somehow, one could travel through time, and decided to travel to the same location one day in the past, you would 'appear' in outer space, because the planet wasn't there one day ago.
High-school level physics can defeat most of the pseudo-science you see/hear every day. Rule of cool, right?
p34cekeeper 1 week ago 2
@p34cekeeper lol yeah but simple co-ordinates solves this problem, the problem of time travel makes this small obstacle insignificant.
Just to add to it though, not only does the point of the materialization or portal need to be addressed but also perhaps the speed at which the planet moves and in what direction it is travelling in relation to the speed and direction of whatever is being transported through time.
FretNinja 1 week ago
@p34cekeeper A man, on earth, which is travelling from A to B must be oriented correctly when being transported through time. Otherrwise, even if the point of entry was correct, if the man did not have the same momentum AND in the same direction as the planet, then... SPLAT!
FretNinja 1 week ago
@FretNinja
That's a good point, but I would argue that the coordinate problem is far from simple: which reference frame do you use? All of the bodies and systems in the universe oscillate constantly in relation to eachother, so to mathematically predict the position of the earth 1,000,000 years ago, you would have to account for the influence of an enormous number of planetary, solar, and extra-solar events.
p34cekeeper 1 week ago
Yo Molly, I think Everetts Many-Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics solves this paradox in a neat way. You are never in the same universe when you time travel... there is a world for every possibility. Max Tegmark at MIT is the leading expert at the time being :)
ElSmusso 3 weeks ago
Oh just take yer knickers off and smile, leave science to scientists !! lol
Dicky2219 3 weeks ago
@Dicky2219 Sad pervert.
arseymcpherson 2 weeks ago
'The thermal law of dynamics' ??? Surely the Law of Thermodynamics, another mentally challenged individual , What a shame, and so pretty too !!! PMSL
Dicky2219 3 weeks ago
The way she says Nokia is very weird
CharlesBloodInit 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
CharlesBloodInit 4 weeks ago
the funny thing is Nokia actually owns most of the patents on the technologies the iphone uses.
lordrazr 1 month ago
We would have defeated the Roman empire. The USA would have been called the USB.. the United States of Brulluhman.
Brulluhman 1 month ago
I would invented beer and called it after myself.
Brulluhman 1 month ago
how was the universe created, there has to be something to create it but what created the thing that created it and so on
jakesnake237 1 month ago
Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff doesn't agree with you!
anerulzproduction 1 month ago
The Nerd Paradox: Everyone watching this video is a nerd, and knows about quantum leap, back to the future, star trek and every other show with time travel paradoxes. Therefore just by making a video on this topic to inform people, you are ensuring that no one who watches it will learn anything. Apparently the solution to the nerd paradox is cuteness. Try having Janet Reno make this video. If you watched it, which you wouldnt, it would only have 1 view, yours.
htomerif 1 month ago
Good one :)
armaniac661 1 month ago
Comment removed
MrSyntheticDesign 1 month ago
The paradox doesn't exclude the possibility of traveling forwards in time.
Jantles 1 month ago
@Jantles I've created a machine that allows you to travel forward in time. It's called the Bacon Cheeseburger. It allows you to travel forwards in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
htomerif 1 month ago
The "thermal law of dynamics," eh?
ChristianTarsney 2 months ago 17
Multiverse is the most elegant solution to the problem, I think.
iamihop11 2 months ago
But if somehow time travel were possible at some point and people did start doing things like marty mcfly did would it not be fine as these alterations have always happened and have never changed as we think we have changed them as they have always been there , changed. i.e chuck berry knew about the song as marty played it in the 50's THEN marty learnt it in the 80's befor he went back in time
ra83clement 2 months ago
I fear the morlocks.
skatebot9000 2 months ago
If a collage of past , present and future events can appear in the mind, , seeing that the methodology of the mind, must apply universally to all Nature, then in some place in the tangible universe , events must have tangential effects of meeting somewhere, and sharing the affluence of past , present or future events. One example is in the black hole, all the distance created by time is squeezed out. So if the Mind can time travel, Nature must already be able to time travel as well.
CarmineFragione 2 months ago
When a past event is packaged to unravel with a determinable affluence in a future time, then that is time travel using Nature. For a future event to change the past, requires multiple universes, but we should not forget how the Free Will is able to detach itself from Nature and act as a radical. Thus, when ancient people behave as if in their mind, they know the future, and their prognostication affects their present actions, such future has in fact altered the past, using the Mind.
CarmineFragione 2 months ago
Either time travel is simply impossible, time travel is possible but will never be discovered, or all the time travels have been avoiding us.
killerkerara 2 months ago
Alliens could also be 'aliens'. It would be hard to believe that we're the only intelligent organism in the universe. I mean the universe is HUGE
Bsnakezs 2 months ago
@Bsnakezs But we haven't been around for very long...and the universe is, well, HUGE.
iamihop11 2 months ago
i believe 'aliens' are actually time travellers. that's why they always look humanoid when reported, and why they make minimal contact; to avoid messing up the past/present/future.
i 100% believe in time travellers.
robchopper87 2 months ago
BOOBS !
prdaca 2 months ago
These hackneyed concepts make me bored of popular science.
John27346 2 months ago
If time travel is possible there would be time travelers outside now and very very early on. If time continues that means that a time machine must have been created already in the future during our time so I'm expecting to already see time travelers. Since there aren't any sadly that means there is no such thing and we will never invent one ever because there isn't a time traveler here now. Unless the future people traveling back now know how to travel in another dimension we cannot see.
MikeKain95 3 months ago
@MikeKain95
Maybe that's not exactly how time works :3
Your brain just creates the illusion of time and space as we know it.
SlipAllCityToy 3 months ago
just clicked this cos of the blonde haired, scandinavian looking bitch in the thumbnail...turns out you're british...thats cool too. let's fuck?
Sw155 3 months ago
@Sw155, If you really want to nail women on YouTube through lame commentage, you really ought to nail their accents to within a hemisphere and a couple of oceans.
loqiloqi 2 months ago
@loqiloqi alright mr. linguistics major, hope that's working out for you :) in the world i live in, i gotta keep my pimp hand strong and shit on bitches.
Sw155 2 months ago
I watch your vids coz I think your a chick ;)
ArtOfRape 3 months ago
Time travel would only be possible if predestination were true. But if predestination were true, time travel would not be possible.
Badwhiskey6 3 months ago
Someone else made it to begin with.. She then explained it to her previous self before it was ever invented, then she invents it, so she basically stole the idea from whoever the original inventor was, he was the one to originally invent it.
haloman800 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In other words, if you are going to go back in time, for fuck's sake, DON'T DO ANYTHING STUPID!!!
Tarynus 3 months ago
The way I see it, a paradox could actually cause a paradox, or it could cause an alternate timeline, one wich would be escapable only by traveling BACK into time, then traveling forward, BEFORE the past you shows up to creat the alternate timeline in the first place, thereby making your past self the one stuck in the other TL, alteast untill HE (or she) does what you did and becomes the you of now.
It sounds like a paradox, but it isn't really
TheDarkBlueNinja 3 months ago
Time and space are one thing. You cannot move your space without having time in which to do it. So going back in time must result in you going back in space, correct? But what does that mean? When youre done time traveling will you be in the place you were at that time? What if you back before you were born? Maybe the farther back you go the more parallel universes you skip over until you land in one. But if parallel universes are in different places from our own, can't we travel to them foward?
Kossimer 4 months ago
Incorrect. Time Travel is possible.
Youtube "Michio Kaku on Time Travel"
He explains the paradox of time travel doesn't necessarily have to form a loop of time. The theory can work using parallel universes where for example, this universe we live in can never have it's time changed. Otherwise it would have happened. But we could travel to another universe that is 10 years behind and our journey would be written there.
P.s. That is a theory. As is time travel.
Don't jump to conclusions :)
HardstyleMatt 4 months ago
the real paradox is, if I am not having sex with you now, and I am raping you in the future, does that mean I will have raped you in the past as well?
robair9911 4 months ago
it could be a kasiber ring a simple recuring sequence that produces product.
the action of preinvention could be the constuctive sequence as opposed to invention and the memory could in fact become or have been the result of the action ipmrinted on your head:as memories are often completly incorect or are confused with imagination.
none of this is relevent time travel is permanently impossible.
mafuyashi 4 months ago
This sentence is a lie.
Get it?
TheDkMovie 4 months ago
@TheDkMovie im proud of you.
225740amaury 3 months ago
Simple. You can only travel in time from the moment a time machine is discovered onwards. You can't go back to a time before time machines were invented.
okzon 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here's a paradox. If u r a woman....Y U making videos and not sandwiches?
DooDzVongola 4 months ago
life was brought back from the future.
domsworkCN 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God you people are pervs
0Kevsta0 5 months ago
but the invention paradox is easy if you understand loops
tehPizzachu 5 months ago
67 guys were waiting for more camel toe
arana05 5 months ago
boobs
Vellyeza 5 months ago
Shes so hot
TokkerProductions 5 months ago
@TokkerProductions She would be hotter is she didn't make mention of Negro Chuck Berry who does not figure into this video very well.
MrBEB123 4 months ago
But this constructive cridisum I will use the back to the future thing. Marty remembered the song when he went back he told his memory so it still came from the first guy it just was introduced earlier then it would have originally there for if it was remembered there he would know the true orjin and every one elce would think diferantly
nikoliishotataimcom 5 months ago
wow
90% of all coments are written by male virgins
SuperKaichen 5 months ago
@SuperKaichen XD this comment is made of win
tehPizzachu 5 months ago
As long as you travel back to a place that are farther away from your current position in space time than it takes light to travel from the gate to the destination, you're perfectly fine. But that means also the result is completely unpredictable, you could easily end up in an alternative universe. And how can you know about a place you don't have information about?
bvssvni 5 months ago
look up the delayed quantum choice experiment, one of the findings is that present observations are affected by future choices (choices which havn't been made yet).
mattos000 5 months ago
@TronPancake but is there a such thing as opposite universes, like and godd/evil change, color change, that sort of thing.
EqualsThreeable 6 months ago
The only way to cure paradoxes is to introduce the idea of parallel universes. The guy in the opening scene of 'Slacker' is basically stating what happens with the PU theory but is implying they only come into existence when there is a choice. In my opinion PUs are 100% there, that means that, if they are, EVERYTHING has happened, is happening, or will happen within the laws of that particular universe, therefore everything has happened an infinite amount of times and that cures paradoxes.
r19ory 6 months ago
@TronPancake Thats only one theory, you cant just state one theory then say the paradox is invalid.
ultimateweena 6 months ago
Traveling back in time is impossible, only travel into the future... If you can gather enough speed.
McMeeps 6 months ago
in this house we obey the laws of thermo dynamics!
potii92 6 months ago 35
Quantum physics :DDDDD
mrtinoban5 6 months ago
How about the Terminator? Kyle goes back in time to before the machines, but a Terminator machine follows him, and after the final battle only its arm is left, which some guys at that company use to build a machine, which later one of those versions follows Kyle Reese back in time, only to be destroyed and have its arm used to make a machine which goes back in time, gets destroyed, then rebuilt to go back and get destroyed to be rebuilt and get destroyed and rebuilt and destroyed andregoigerokhh
Conmon1 6 months ago
Im anoyed, being a time traveler myself. when you go to the past you go there as you were at that point in time, but if you explained how to make a time machine you dont mess anything up, even if you go forward in time to where you were after going through, you were in a diffrent dimention. every Google of a second (1 with 100 zeros behind it) makes a new dimention and makes it so you cant mess shit up. its easy to explain as a tree diagram
Dante9377 6 months ago
Can an Omnipotent being create a rock so heavy that the being itself cannot lift it?
MrNomSauce 6 months ago
I also figured out something. If you go back in time to kill yourself. If your still alive. You'ved failed to
pikmin1231 6 months ago
another solution: there is no time. time is an invention by humans. We measure it using quite different methods. if you believe the theory of relativity, time cant be measured uniformly because it passes with different speeds in different interial reference frame.
so if time is only a tool, used by humans to help imagine the world, how can we explain time passing? simple: the world develops and as it does, we see it change.
SebastianMisch 6 months ago
@SebastianMisch so if for instance a stone falls down a tower. but have you seen a stone fall up the tower? i havent. so why would there be something like moving backwards in time? thats what the analogy would be. moving backwards in time = the stone falling back up the tower.
SebastianMisch 6 months ago
or it could that time travel will just never be possable in your life
FinalFantasyIXIIII 6 months ago
I've dedicated my life to a time travel experiment. I know that time travel isn't possible, because if it was I would have come back and prevented myself from marrying my ex wife.
alueshen 6 months ago
@alueshen Well, let's just assume that either your future self could only achieve time travel due to said ex-wife. If he came back to stop the marriage, you would never one day invent time travel allowing you to come back and stop the marriage which.. etc
taa347 6 months ago
If Time travel IS Possible.... You wouldnt be able to change anything at all.
omarvgaga 6 months ago
Awesome tits :)
mercyflush101 6 months ago
Beauty with brains...
29pou 6 months ago
@29pou
You guys are creepy as fuck.
Jcolinsol 6 months ago
um, they do realize that travelling back in time is impossible, right?
clearly it was in movies and tv shows, so it must be possible.... oh, wait, no. it's still impossible.
amn3h23h2 6 months ago
If you say (to prove time travel does not exist) "when time travel is possible i will come back to this moment to see myself", it does not prove anything because would you really remember in the future maybe 50+ years from now that you must go back in time to the exact second when you said that statement? im not saying its possible, its just a flaw in that "experiment"
jonyboy1226 6 months ago
thats not a paradox.. its easy the answer is.. YOU TIME TRAVELED BACKWARDS SO YOU HAVE THAT TIME MACHINE AND YOU CAN USE IT TO GO KILL YOURSELF
onofomi 6 months ago
time travel is possible... you're doing it right now. as for going back in time and killing mom... you're a sick bastard, also once an item comes into being it exists in at least one of the multiverses, and will thus always exist. any means of time travel other than the natural progression we experience as a result of spacial expansion will likely involve interaction with other multiverses. so it's more accurate to describe time travel as travel between multiverses or intradimensional travel
cwross1976 7 months ago
Well i invented Science...
thedragonslayer117 7 months ago 9
take some shrooms
kealan8010 7 months ago
I actually invented the Nutty Professor. It was stolen from me by that sonnofabitch time traveler.
MoarSugarcubes 7 months ago
This can also be demonstrated in Legend Of Zelda, Ocarina of Time. In the Future, when you are adult link, you learn the Song of Storms from Tingle. Then, you travel back in time to teach tingle the song, so he can learn it and teach it to you in the future, and then yapp blah bluh bluh Paradox.
supershadow64ds 7 months ago
What if history has already been altereed?
xMikey21 7 months ago
Well, time travel is impossible, since the past only exists in our memories, and not as a "thing" that exists objectively
KamasutraButterfly 8 months ago
@KamasutraButterfly that is a certain theory of time which you haven't argued for. =)
atbigdog24002 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Blah13lah Do you remember this video?
anticorncob6 8 months ago
if you went back in time and killed yourself wouldn't you be dead already? so you couldn't kill yourself and the you in the past would randomly die. right?
17zambre 8 months ago
@17zambre I can solve the paradox of time travel. It is similar to the solution at 2:14, but it doesn't say that there is a parallel universe where you just raped someone.
I'll PM you the solution and it's a bit long.
anticorncob6 8 months ago
Bare with me but if you went forward in time and killed yourself would that not mean you live forever? Because you kill your older self then when you grow up you get killed by yourself so theres always a version of you in existence!
tvwatcher21 9 months ago
But what about the solution that time travile is posible but ONLY in one derection
NerdBryant64 9 months ago
one - she's such a cute f#$k
two - i can see my country behind her on the map
three - tt is not possible - gtfo!
sincerely yours
duckingaunt 9 months ago
@duckingaunt
I can see my country too. It's the second largest one.
a0coocoobrain0o0o0o 8 months ago
@duckingaunt "tt is not possible - gtfo!"
How do you know? With general relativety backwards time travel probably is possible.
anticorncob6 8 months ago
@anticorncob6
"... time travel probably is possible."
possibly is probable :D GTFO! :D
duckingaunt 8 months ago
@duckingaunt
one - she looks like my mother (GTFO!)
two - I live in antarctica and the antarctica on the map is WAAY bigger then the one in real life (GTFO!)
three - GTFO!
four - your comments are so hilarious, GTFI!
anticorncob6 8 months ago
Johnny B. Goode is a perfect piece of music, and if you can imagine such a piece to exist, it must exist, regardless of whether or not someone wrote it...
all hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster!
Kabitu1 9 months ago
She stood herself up...lol
bradwolf07 9 months ago
Did she say 'thermal law of dynamics'?
mauroprovatos 10 months ago
@mauroprovatos Yup I think it's actually law of thermodynamics... don't know if I spelled it right.
anticorncob6 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
show us your tits
HalfEatenDimSim 10 months ago
Going back through time is'nt possible, going forward might be though... if we could bring human to speed approaching (0,99xx times) the speed of light ( witch we are ridiculously far from doing but stil ... in space with no friction ... it might be possible ... ) then time for this person would be considerebly slowed down ... so they would come back in a year, but on earth a couple year might have passed by ...
Going back through time being impossible dosnt imply that going forward isnt ....
659851 10 months ago
@659851 Why do you think traveling back in time is impossible? If you believe in general relativity, you believe traveling BACK in time isn't impossible.
anticorncob6 7 months ago
@anticorncob6
How would it be possible using relativity to go back through time ?? And what do you mean ''if you believe in relativity.'' ?? this is a proven theory, I've worked with it, it's used in many applications ... Why or how could one ''not believe'' it ??
Anyway, if you happen to know theoreticaly how it would be possible i'd like to know about it !! I know going forward would be if we had the technology .. But back i just dont see a way !
Cheers !!
659851 7 months ago
@anticorncob6
I don't think it's possible for 2 reasons:
1- I just dont see a way even theoreticaly for it to be possible ( with does not mean it isnt but ... you know ... I quite scientificaly up to date and so for nothing half descent has come up to suggest we can even think about it)
2- The hole argument that this video demonstrates. Lets say you go back and kill your mother... You could not have existed to kill her This opens the door for this that just cant happen !!
Cheers
659851 7 months ago
@659851 1- wormholes
2- When you go back, you enter a new timeline and there's TWO places for 1980 when you kill your mother: one where she lives to create you and one where you kill her
It may not sound scientific but I agree with this and there's a lot of details that need a lot more then 500 characters. And my computer is running slow. I know people who don't believe in relativity, look up "Length contraction debunked". I think non-relativists are quite stupid.
anticorncob6 7 months ago
@anticorncob6
Yeah !! I get the wormhole point. but the thing is, we havnt seen a worm hole yet, we dont even know they exist! They are still a product of physician's mental masturbation !! Although very interesting I gota say !! So.. I get your point but this does not make it ''possible'' in my mind yet !
It's about the same thing for the multi universe argument, intersting mental masturbation but we dont have nothing to suggest it makes sens!
Thx for the response!
Cheers!
659851 7 months ago
there's a small problem with this paradox....what if the time machine was invented 50 years after this girl died? Fault by default.
nonamebob83 10 months ago
the answer to this Paradox is easy. and the answer is Multiversum! :D
everytime u chance the History, u kreate a new Universe where the new Timeline is the only one truse. but u can not return to our Home universe, cause u can´t make the chance undone without making new chances.maybe u wanna try out Sthepen Baxter´s "the Timeships" he explainse the whole thing pretty good. and its a funny book to read :)
Zombiepull 10 months ago
@Zombiepull The big problem with your theory is that we don't have free will. There's nothing that makes our brains so special that our choices would create entire new universes: they're chemistry.
It would also mean that our choices would be random, since every choice will be made in multiple ways, chance dictates that we are most likely to be in a universe where are choices seem random, since, according to you, our choices are just random coin flips that create universes.
Choices aren't random
Thunderios 9 months ago
@Thunderios Yes we do have free will otherwise wouldnt be able to doubt God and disobey him.
MrDjwithers 9 months ago
@MrDjwithers Yes it is our free will, but not entirely. We are influenced by everyone and everything around us, and every one of our decisions is made from an emotional response. Such as taking the shortcut, you want to get home and do what ever you want to quicker. Because you have the emotion of desire for whatever the activity you want to do at home. Everything is chosen due to emotional responses.
Skillerguy45 9 months ago
@Skillerguy45 but you can choose to ignore those emotions and do something else
for example say you want to kill someone and your about to hurt that person but you choose to ignore the anger and hate and you forgive and dont kill the person.
MrDjwithers 9 months ago
@MrDjwithers Haha, I like how your thinking but it's deeper than that. Don't give me shit because it has been proven. In a car crash a man lost the side of his brain that controls emotions. Everything else was fine, but he could not make decisions. Even basic things too. And your example of killing someone you do not kill them because the fear of getting caught is overpowering to the other.
Skillerguy45 9 months ago
@MrDjwithers No, our surroundings and the structure of our brains are the only things that determine what we choose. If we choose to disobey God (however you want to call it), it's because our brain isn't satisfied with the information it gets from our surrounding (in my case that would be evidence that is required for a God).
I don't see why free will is required. On top of that, you're appealing to consequences: it doesn't matter what the lack of free will implies for your untestable faith.
Thunderios 9 months ago
@Thunderios :D Yey someone else who knows what they're talking about!
Skillerguy45 9 months ago
@Skillerguy45 "Yes it is our free will" - Skillerguy45
You believe in free will.
Prepare for a debate to the death, my friend.
Just kidding :D It's kind of fun to discuss free will, because a lot of people don't have a clue and are like "If I WANTED I could do X" then explaining that that is not proof of free will, and that free will is logically impossible in layman terms is kinda hard, too.
Anyway, have a nice day and discussion with Mr WIthers.
Thunderios 9 months ago
@Thunderios :P yeah, "Yes it is our free will" I mean it in the way that it is us that makes the decision but the decision is influenced by everything around us and our emotions. Some people (Not mentioning names...*cough* *cough*) don't think of emotions deep enough.
Skillerguy45 9 months ago
@Skillerguy45 OK one why you being a cunt and wont see the lodgic to anything? oh wait cause deep down you know God is real your just too afraid to say cause you wanna impress people on the internet
MrDjwithers 9 months ago
@MrDjwithers Dude calm down. I said that reply as a joke to Thunderios. Learn how to spell logic and you are just a troll. I throw logic at you. It's like throwing a sandwich at a brick wall. It won't do anything and I've wasted my time making a decent sandwich. Nice reply of swearing blindly. This is an argument not relating to religion, but if you must know I am an Atheist. I hope you don't behave like this in real life kid.
Peace out.
Skillerguy45 9 months ago
@MrDjwithers I was trying to be serious, but now you blew it. I thought you were a decent person who wanted to know the truth and therefore would meet others and discuss the big questions in life. In stead you seem to be a person that gets angry when people aren't convinced by their argument (and with reason, too!).
And then you make the worst argument ever. Please, you must know this is the biggest pile of bullshit anyone ever thought up. I'm sorry I thought you were worth it...
Thunderios 9 months ago 2
@Thunderios Thumbs up for you :D
Skillerguy45 9 months ago
@Thunderios YOU? you thought i was serious? hahaha dude calm down I was kidding lmao
MrDjwithers 9 months ago
@MrDjwithers Actually, I think the only lie you've told is this comment. Most people believe in free will because the illusion is so strong, and their objectivity so weak. Your response has been the usual one, so I am rather certain you were being honest. Until you got angry, and fuck around because you're on the internet anyway, and actions don't have consequences.
Irresponsible child, is what I mean with that.
Thunderios 9 months ago
Moving backward in time is NOT possible. An object with mass and energy cannot be in two places at the same time.
Except maybe for a Bose Einstein condensate.
1acroyear1 10 months ago
@1acroyear1 you are wrong, there a numerous studies showing how an atom can be two places at the same time. Look in to string theory and the double slit experiment.
mkno79 10 months ago
@mkno79 String theory isn't really relevant to those quantum phenomena. The double slit experiment merely shows that matter has a wave property. Eventually we resolved the problem with making the whole particle a wave of probability, where, when it has to react to something, it 'chooses' a position randomly. So it's not in two places at once, it isn't in a position, just within a certain boundary with a certain chance.
Thunderios 9 months ago
Time is an illusion. There is only motion.
R5d4d2 11 months ago
The time machine was invented by Dr. Emmett Brown in Hill Valley, California in 1985. He used a DeLorean and a flux capacitor to make the machine work.
vanjo6187 11 months ago
say if your not alive to come back in time or if it only goes forward
qazwsxedc562 11 months ago
I thought ontological was something to do with dentistry. d'oh!!
cricketbat08 11 months ago
Such a lovely lady...I want to make sweet love to her!
JasonVladimir 11 months ago 42
@JasonVladimir fuck off i seen her first!
greengardenhose 8 months ago
Dear Molly, you're hot. I'm having unspeakable thoughts about you. I don't want a relationship, I just want to borrow you for an hour or so for a jam session.
bigboy45454545 11 months ago
wow. you are hot.
DrMeh3 11 months ago
stephen hawking proved that it is possible to travel forward in time but not backwards
spikycactus777 1 year ago
one person has ever time travelled into the past. He was in one of the space stations for like a couple of years and therefor has experienced 0.02 seconds less then everyone on earth
991woot119 1 year ago
@991woot119 time goes faster in space it would be 0.02 seconds before everyone else
spikycactus777 1 year ago
@spikycactus777 thats what I said 0.02 seconds less is 0.02 seconds before. He'd be in 0.02 seconds before everone else because he has experienced 0.02 seconds less then anyone else
991woot119 11 months ago
The Yes and No Paradox: Suppose your parents go out for dinner, and to travel, they use their Ford Explorer. However, in your garage remains the second car. Imagine its a Toyota Corolla. As time passes you worry about yor parents that are not coming back and realise that the only car that could be them is the Ford Explorer. Later on your parents come back in the exact same Corolla car you still have on your garage. This says that your parents travelled back in time and used the Corolla to travel
marchewo123 1 year ago
When one travels back in time, the point of re-entry creates a new time line. The new time-line is unbounded. Chuck Berry wrote Johnny B Good in time-line #1 and then Marty taught it to Chuck Berry in time-line #2. The two time-lines exist as parallel universes. Once you leave a time-line, you can never return to it.
jojomojojones 1 year ago
@arshaneyt yeah now that i think about it.. : /
Hunsranee25 1 year ago
What? no mention of the song of storms in Ocarina of Time?
nintendo53 1 year ago
how would she miss the appointment with a time machine?
lalaliam 1 year ago 13
I think i'm in love now
ShaxAMV 1 year ago
hoooooot :)
calop002 1 year ago
Since current is shaped out of the past, if a syndicate (of everybody i hope) could control every movement that is in our dimension of time, and then just trail on the past, everybody would be brought to the exact copy of the past.
Melki 1 year ago
This is not a paradox-
You're passing something that's impossible off as hypothetical.
BenjaminTLaing 1 year ago
screw time travel man. That chick damn hot!
ugurLP1990 1 year ago
Motion is relative, as is time, matter, and energy. Theoretically, If one were able to travel faster than the speed of light(though this would require an infinite amount of energy to propel a particle as it approaches infinite mass) then one would travel back in time. However, I think this time travel will only be relative to the time traveler, that is, he would experience the past, but have no effect on the "real" past that people going less than the speed of light experienced.
david52875 1 year ago
In back to the future, the time line is changed. At the end, their whole life is changed. It's only reasonable to assume that they also changed other parts of the time line when they went back in time. In this case, instead of Chuck Berry writing the song himself, he hears Marty play it. So Chuck Berry is still the original creator.
xendot 1 year ago 9
i believe that, if a paradox caused by time travel were to happen, time itself would choose one side of the paradox... =)
raheelandleon 1 year ago
Such paradoxes are why I believe time travel into the past will never escape the realm of science fiction.
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
danm ima skiping this its making ma head ache!!
lilylouise98 1 year ago
In thought experiments time travel is possible, because time machines would be like phones. You can't phone someone if only one phone exists, you need another phone to call up.
In the same way you need a phone somewhere else, you'd need a time portal some*when* else to go to reach a different time.
DontTouchMyVicodin 1 year ago
This proves that time machines that go BACK in time will never be made. Not just because of the Parodoxes but a really old lady would have showed up instead of young molly....
twmjlm 1 year ago
Time travel may be more like "Time line" travel it's not that you travel though time but parallel earths. There may possibly be infinite earth time lines that which you change your vibratory frequency to match the preferred time line instead of the earth changing for you. That could be like how people say the law of attraction is great of manifesting what you want in your life, but really your tapping into a parallel earth when that certain thing was available to you?
DJRedro 1 year ago
The concept of time itself is flawed.
Crazychris215 1 year ago
of course time travel is possible, we all know the speed of light holds the key to it.....
NexProjex 1 year ago