@03LancerDude Im not gettin into a pissing battle with you, but from exp. I beg to differ. had 07 ms3 sold it, got 09 lancer gts .after 12000 miles the car was falling apart from the window that broke at 200 miles to the wipers stopping to work and the theft system lockin me out twice. needless to say..it's gone got another 07 ms3 . but to each their own
You weren't blessed, you got a "lemon" but I get where you're coming from, I'm not like all the people who talk shit online, but I obviously own a Mitsu, and love it. Although I want a truck now because I am getting into offroading haha
@bdbl0 No dude, even consumer reports and edmunds show, Mistu's have crap reliability. They are not well built and have alot of issues as they age. Alot of Nissans are the same way.
all this arguing back and forth about evos and ms3's and i didnt see anyone point out the huge difference in price between a evo and ms3. the ms3 is so much cheaper its not even funny
i just bought a Pearl white MS3 2008. At first i thought the car was weird looking...but after owning one for a week the look has grown on me...I love it now...Plus the handling is amazing! What matters is your own opinion!!! Who cares what others think! Iam enjoying my new ride!! All the haters can say what ever they like...I dont care...
u honestly cant be serious when u say that the ms3 looks better than the evo and sti..im gunna be buying a ms3 when i get back from deployment, but i KNOW it dosnt look better than the evo. im buying it cause of great gas mileage, its functional, and quick. i cant lie, it dosnt look so hott. its kinda weird lookin to be honest. but in a good way..
If you give the Mazdaspeed3 a little bit of long run, definitely would beat any car, starting by an old porche boxer, and all BMW 3 series... and its a MAZDA!!! btw I have one, really fun!
I'm a Mazdaspeed 3 owner and I'm not scared to say the EVO is a great car. Why do you have to talk shit about one if you are a fan of the other? As a Mazdaspeed 3 owner you shouldn't be worried about EVO's, be worried about GTIs and SRT-4's. Leave the EVO hating to the STI owners and respect two great cars.
i love evo, sti and ms3. but to be honest, ms3 can create so much power with just intake and exhaust and lighter wheels. my friend's black speed3 pulled on evos in third+. evo and STi's are great midrange, but top end lacks a lot. the awd cant distribute enough power to all four. MS3 are rolling monsters.
A lot of people think the new WRX is ugly.... and it is, and this mazda is exactly the same shape, akward looking. Evo is a much better looking car. Im not an evo fan, ive got a 2004 WRX
ignorance seems to run rampent in here! The mazdaspeed3 is in a different price bracket than the EVO!! And if its some shitty why does it win all the sport compact test? $22.5 and 1/4 at 14sec@101mph. 0 to 60 5.4. and handling to match.
hey, i drove the speed3 thats in the video and its no slouch, its very quick, for the money you cant beat the deal you get with that car. Thoses runs at gld i was launching at 6k in the evo and powershifting, my best run that day was a 12.9. Also that speed3 broke into the 13's last month, looking for 12's
very true, put the money that someone wasted into a speed 3 and it would walk all over an EVO. no contest, in every category the EVO would lose and with the extra money you could make the speed 3 awd
Actually if you spent the same amount on both cars the Evo would still win from a dig. Now from a roll it might be a different story considering the MS3 has a larger displacement than the Evo and the MS3's compression ratio is higer so it responds better off of boost, but stock for stock the evo does have 40 more horses and 9 more ft. lbs of torque.
And I would actually like to see the MS3 take the Evo in every category. Considering the goes from 0-60 in about 4.5 seconds, does the 1/4 mile in 13.4 @ 104 and its 60-0 braking distance is 110ft which if I remember reading correctly is in supercar range.
EVO owns in speed category so equal mods wont do much since the stock block of the evo can do 500 awhp. I dont see any MS3's even touching 500 hp let along 1000 hp so I dunno.
Bullshit, go to any real track event and you won't see many speed3's on the track at all, let alone lapping any fast laps compared to any all wheel drive Evo.
Money or no money, a FWD car just will not outperform an AWD unless it's a straight line or has stupid amounts of money invested in it... it's still going to handle like shit.
Handling comes from suspension, not AWD. AWD is useful if the car has more than 1000HP, not if it has a glorified lawnmower motor, and my MS3 leaves EVOs in a tiny spot on my rearview mirror
- I don't need to go to a track to see that - I see that every Friday and Saturday night. How many fucking Evos do I have to put in the dust before they realize they can't compete?
Handling does come from AWD Holey, without power being put down to the wheels, your FWD Mazdanotspeeding, will just understeer, where as an AWD vehicle can apply power and power through the turn leaving any FWD car in the dust.
Friday and Saturday nights are nothing, go to a real track and you'll see Evo's at the front of the pack. Funny I never see Mazdas at the drag or road courses, because they fail miserably at handling.
Really? Why does the Mini Cooper S have the highest slalom speed if it's only FWD? Why does the Porsche GT-2 with rear drive out slalom the Porsche 911 Turbo with AWD?
I hate to say it, But I used to own and autocross a Mini Cooper S and sold it for an STI a couple of years ago. The mini handle very well, but it handles no where near as well as the STI. AWD makes a bigger difference then you think. And btw the Cooper S doesn't have the fastest slalom speed...
lol... your description of handling is somewhat correct.. but for the most part its just pure Ignorance. Handling of a vehicle has way more to do just being power distributed through corners. It has to do with weight distribution and for the most part..."down force". FYI mazdas are the most register vehicle for all "OPEN TRACK" Events in the nation. I do agree that most AWD handles better then MOST FWD. Focus RS vs Evo????
I see more Evo's at more events than I have ever seen any Mazdas... plus to stay ON topic... the Evo in this video spanked the Mazda. Proof is in the pudding.
yes.. and again... Your ignorance has made you assume the region that you live in is the only place that has race tracks... But i cant blame you because you only know what you see. But what the hell is a drag race going to settle??? you want to race..in a straight line.... take a stock ms3 versus a stock evo on a 40mph roll and see what happens??? But the point is to show you that AWD does not = fast lap times....focus rs vs evo??? cobalt ss/tc vs evo?? exactly...........
NO one cares about stock cars vs stock cars, put some bolt on on an Evo, reflash the ECU... do some research on YouTube and search for Buschur Racing, AMS, TurboTrix and TTP Engineering, AWD Motorsports... they all put out street driven Evo's that will put any MazdaSlow in the rear view mirror.
actually, I'm pretty sure you can beat an EVO VIII and IX stock for stock with a Cobalt SS/TC or MS3 from a dig, as a majority of EVO drivers have no clue on how to launch their cars.... that's how I've won against them so far....
I listed those shops, in hope of you doing some actual research on hundreds of cars being put out by these shops that have simple bolt ons or upgraded turbos. I see you did no such research.
The Evo or Subaru with AWD handling will put buslengths on any Mazda Slow in a multitude of scanarios, be it gravel , snow or on a tarmac surface. This can be done in twisties or the drag race.
So compare the number of 9/10 second Evo's in your straight line ignorance of power against track prepped ones.
not any mazda mate.. i'm sure you still young and don't even seen mazda competition in rally....it were when evo and sti aren't born yet...mazda was the first japanese manufacture who use the awd in their rally car...read the history
to assert what the fellow below said, ive been to road courses around the country and see far more "high end" cars such as evos,stis,lotus,vettes,porsches, than i do mazdas. and the few times i have seen mazdas they got destroyed. im sure there are some out there that handle well. but in my 5+ years of road racing i havent seen one that was impressive by any standard.
@chickenlittlebite im fully aware of the RX7. they are good handling cars. but with the fact that they are getting to be 10+ year old cars, and they are still rather expensive, its not often they are seen at the track.
how is the GTR ..seen any? i love the GTR more..descendant of ms3....anyway yeah it was limited...mazda has invest in handling and AWD since 80's...when other japanese thought it a waste and costly...
The way you jsut descirbed the MS3s differences is the same comapred to the SRT4 except for th SRT4 gets a different interior, a much more defining differential from tis regular ounterpart, and a couple other things. ITs also turbo'd. So wtf are you talking about.. Both are POS FWDs as far as I am concerned..
The Caliber-SRT4 is ugly AND hits 0-60 in the 6 second range, lol, my front wheel drive 205hp small turbocharged Saab 9-3 does 0-60 in 6.1 seconds lmao, that's not saying anything positive about the Caliber that has 285hp.
It sucks that Car and Driver just posted the specs on the new SRT 4, not 300hp like dodge was bragging about, its only 286hp, and not 300lb tq, just 260±. 0-60 is only 6.1 sec and quarter mile is 14.4. That sucks bad man, pick a new car to talk about.
I was the owner of that evo and my buddy was the speed3 driver...that was at GLD raceway. I had a turboback, CAI and Tune and it was a 05 evo and i paid 21,500 for it not 35. The speed3 had a upgraded motor mount and greddy type s bov. I ran a best 12.9 and he ran i believe a 14.2 with really soft launchs.
i would hope so MS3 price = 22.8, evo price =dont know dont care but somewhere around 35, MS3 1/4 mile=14.2 evo=13.3 (stock) Id hope for the extra ten grand youd get a little more car
that evo wasent stock .. and im pretty sure the ms3 was ... if the ms3 had some right mods on it im sure it would have keeped waayy closer to the evo ...
Hey, i guess im a little late here, well I was the Evo Driver and my cousin is the speed driver. I had a full Turboback and CAI and a tune and a couple other goodies, not much though, the evo was a 05 and i paid 21,500 for it not 35 grand. Yes the speed3 had an upgraded motor mount and tore it off on teh first launch, since then he got a custom solid and poly mount made for teh car.
who won?
mzking1980 2 years ago
MITSUBISHI's ARE BETTER CARS. Period.
03LancerDude 2 years ago
i have had a very sour experience with both mazda and mitsubishi. However i can safely say mitsubishi is the faster vehicle.
mucura1 2 years ago
mitsubishis break down one you sick idk what youre talking about -_- poor quality motors
prejudiceguy 2 years ago
@03LancerDude Im not gettin into a pissing battle with you, but from exp. I beg to differ. had 07 ms3 sold it, got 09 lancer gts .after 12000 miles the car was falling apart from the window that broke at 200 miles to the wipers stopping to work and the theft system lockin me out twice. needless to say..it's gone got another 07 ms3 . but to each their own
bdbl0 2 years ago
You weren't blessed, you got a "lemon" but I get where you're coming from, I'm not like all the people who talk shit online, but I obviously own a Mitsu, and love it. Although I want a truck now because I am getting into offroading haha
03LancerDude 2 years ago
@bdbl0 No dude, even consumer reports and edmunds show, Mistu's have crap reliability. They are not well built and have alot of issues as they age. Alot of Nissans are the same way.
lostxtsol 1 year ago
all this arguing back and forth about evos and ms3's and i didnt see anyone point out the huge difference in price between a evo and ms3. the ms3 is so much cheaper its not even funny
survivorsmiraculous 2 years ago
LOL! hahahaha
its2realj 2 years ago
at the end of the day your still drivin a mazda.
xflip4lifex 2 years ago
Happy to do it
HoleyDiver 2 years ago 2
i just bought a Pearl white MS3 2008. At first i thought the car was weird looking...but after owning one for a week the look has grown on me...I love it now...Plus the handling is amazing! What matters is your own opinion!!! Who cares what others think! Iam enjoying my new ride!! All the haters can say what ever they like...I dont care...
Mandoman99 3 years ago 6
I'd love to watch a match between a Mazdaspeed 3 and and a Volvo C30. That would be interesting.
05Forenza 3 years ago
only reasin evo one cuz of the 4 whel drive
Asim1Killa 3 years ago
u honestly cant be serious when u say that the ms3 looks better than the evo and sti..im gunna be buying a ms3 when i get back from deployment, but i KNOW it dosnt look better than the evo. im buying it cause of great gas mileage, its functional, and quick. i cant lie, it dosnt look so hott. its kinda weird lookin to be honest. but in a good way..
PFCTurner311 3 years ago
The looks are very subjective.
fstms3 3 years ago
You sound like someone defending your ugly girlfriend.
Love9sick 3 years ago
If you give the Mazdaspeed3 a little bit of long run, definitely would beat any car, starting by an old porche boxer, and all BMW 3 series... and its a MAZDA!!! btw I have one, really fun!
kilop03 3 years ago 2
Mazdaspeed3 looks a lot better than the EVO and WRX by a long shot.
sedansi0777 3 years ago
agreed 100%
WIDERisBETTER 3 years ago
I'm a Mazdaspeed 3 owner and I'm not scared to say the EVO is a great car. Why do you have to talk shit about one if you are a fan of the other? As a Mazdaspeed 3 owner you shouldn't be worried about EVO's, be worried about GTIs and SRT-4's. Leave the EVO hating to the STI owners and respect two great cars.
BigMike4488 3 years ago
i love evo, sti and ms3. but to be honest, ms3 can create so much power with just intake and exhaust and lighter wheels. my friend's black speed3 pulled on evos in third+. evo and STi's are great midrange, but top end lacks a lot. the awd cant distribute enough power to all four. MS3 are rolling monsters.
Evo2nr90 3 years ago 10
wow xxdriver u got some weird taste
mironov1 3 years ago 2
A lot of people think the new WRX is ugly.... and it is, and this mazda is exactly the same shape, akward looking. Evo is a much better looking car. Im not an evo fan, ive got a 2004 WRX
XXdriver2000XX 3 years ago
the evo is most expensive and also waaay uglier than speed3
maxpinche 4 years ago
You must be joking, the EVO is a great shape, the speed3 is even uglier than the 2008 WRX, and thats saying something
XXdriver2000XX 3 years ago
hey I didn´t asked you which one you liked the more , did I? I really don´t care. get a life bro!
maxpinche 3 years ago
Well im telling you anyway BRO
XXdriver2000XX 3 years ago 3
O.K im telling you anyway that you can go fuck yourself
maxpinche 3 years ago
Ive already done that today. And if you didn't want a reply on the "EVO is ugly" comment then why did you put it on here BRO!
XXdriver2000XX 3 years ago 2
personally, I think both cars are very nice looking. I'd love to have either one. Evo is too expensive though (for a college student).
krazyk86cu 3 years ago
shut the fuck off, speed3 its a nice car....good in all the ways, not though really sporty but it has everything on it!!
kilop03 3 years ago
you are still a fucktard
Stonerhino88 3 years ago
you are a fuck tard
Stonerhino88 3 years ago
Whats a fucktard? stoner, are you stoned right now?
XXdriver2000XX 3 years ago
What happened to the beginning of this race?
thapr3dat0r 4 years ago
the evo won simply by his launch. totally expected
veltpak6 4 years ago 3
ignorance seems to run rampent in here! The mazdaspeed3 is in a different price bracket than the EVO!! And if its some shitty why does it win all the sport compact test? $22.5 and 1/4 at 14sec@101mph. 0 to 60 5.4. and handling to match.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
hey, i drove the speed3 thats in the video and its no slouch, its very quick, for the money you cant beat the deal you get with that car. Thoses runs at gld i was launching at 6k in the evo and powershifting, my best run that day was a 12.9. Also that speed3 broke into the 13's last month, looking for 12's
mustangGT375 4 years ago 2
very true, put the money that someone wasted into a speed 3 and it would walk all over an EVO. no contest, in every category the EVO would lose and with the extra money you could make the speed 3 awd
Stonerhino88 3 years ago
Actually if you spent the same amount on both cars the Evo would still win from a dig. Now from a roll it might be a different story considering the MS3 has a larger displacement than the Evo and the MS3's compression ratio is higer so it responds better off of boost, but stock for stock the evo does have 40 more horses and 9 more ft. lbs of torque.
JayWeezie88 3 years ago
And I would actually like to see the MS3 take the Evo in every category. Considering the goes from 0-60 in about 4.5 seconds, does the 1/4 mile in 13.4 @ 104 and its 60-0 braking distance is 110ft which if I remember reading correctly is in supercar range.
JayWeezie88 3 years ago
the mazdaspeed 3 already does 60-0 in 111 feet
indeskize85 3 years ago 3
EVO owns in speed category so equal mods wont do much since the stock block of the evo can do 500 awhp. I dont see any MS3's even touching 500 hp let along 1000 hp so I dunno.
This coming from an MS3 owner.
werkroks 3 years ago
ya i have a speed 3 as well i was just adding that the speed was already very close in the breaking department.
indeskize85 3 years ago
negative.
mrbuzzkill1234 2 years ago
With no extra money spent, my MS3 will pull away from an EVO on the highway. Because that piece of shit doesn't have any legs.
HoleyDiver 2 years ago
only thing that matters is the 1/4 and the track...and the ms3 losses in both of those cases...
1991TalonTSI 2 years ago
Sorry, I drive my car on the street
I can't get to places like the yacht bay or the club if I'm on a track
BTW, it's spelled looses not "losses" -
there's a spellcheck at the top just in case there's no school or anything like that at the track
HoleyDiver 2 years ago
omg i made a spelling error, i MUST be uneducated....
1991TalonTSI 2 years ago
Bullshit, go to any real track event and you won't see many speed3's on the track at all, let alone lapping any fast laps compared to any all wheel drive Evo.
Money or no money, a FWD car just will not outperform an AWD unless it's a straight line or has stupid amounts of money invested in it... it's still going to handle like shit.
comp5d5 2 years ago
Handling comes from suspension, not AWD. AWD is useful if the car has more than 1000HP, not if it has a glorified lawnmower motor, and my MS3 leaves EVOs in a tiny spot on my rearview mirror
- I don't need to go to a track to see that - I see that every Friday and Saturday night. How many fucking Evos do I have to put in the dust before they realize they can't compete?
HoleyDiver 2 years ago
Handling does come from AWD Holey, without power being put down to the wheels, your FWD Mazdanotspeeding, will just understeer, where as an AWD vehicle can apply power and power through the turn leaving any FWD car in the dust.
Friday and Saturday nights are nothing, go to a real track and you'll see Evo's at the front of the pack. Funny I never see Mazdas at the drag or road courses, because they fail miserably at handling.
comp5d5 2 years ago
Really? Why does the Mini Cooper S have the highest slalom speed if it's only FWD? Why does the Porsche GT-2 with rear drive out slalom the Porsche 911 Turbo with AWD?
Maybe you should check your facts first
HoleyDiver 2 years ago
I hate to say it, But I used to own and autocross a Mini Cooper S and sold it for an STI a couple of years ago. The mini handle very well, but it handles no where near as well as the STI. AWD makes a bigger difference then you think. And btw the Cooper S doesn't have the fastest slalom speed...
ericsteinhauer 2 years ago
I'm sure the Cooper S is in the top ten
What about your STI? Is that is the top ten? I'm surprised that formula 1 cars don't have have AWD since it's such a performance enhancer-
HoleyDiver 2 years ago
They're actually working on introducing AWD to F1 in the next few years.
ericsteinhauer 2 years ago
lol... your description of handling is somewhat correct.. but for the most part its just pure Ignorance. Handling of a vehicle has way more to do just being power distributed through corners. It has to do with weight distribution and for the most part..."down force". FYI mazdas are the most register vehicle for all "OPEN TRACK" Events in the nation. I do agree that most AWD handles better then MOST FWD. Focus RS vs Evo????
its2realj 2 years ago
I see more Evo's at more events than I have ever seen any Mazdas... plus to stay ON topic... the Evo in this video spanked the Mazda. Proof is in the pudding.
comp5d5 2 years ago
yes.. and again... Your ignorance has made you assume the region that you live in is the only place that has race tracks... But i cant blame you because you only know what you see. But what the hell is a drag race going to settle??? you want to race..in a straight line.... take a stock ms3 versus a stock evo on a 40mph roll and see what happens??? But the point is to show you that AWD does not = fast lap times....focus rs vs evo??? cobalt ss/tc vs evo?? exactly...........
its2realj 2 years ago 2
NO one cares about stock cars vs stock cars, put some bolt on on an Evo, reflash the ECU... do some research on YouTube and search for Buschur Racing, AMS, TurboTrix and TTP Engineering, AWD Motorsports... they all put out street driven Evo's that will put any MazdaSlow in the rear view mirror.
comp5d5 2 years ago
Typical response... But there are three things i did take from that reply from you.
1) you just admitted to my point that a MS3 and Cobalt will take you on the roll...and that stock for stock a FWD can handle better than a AWD car...
2) You obviously can not stay on subject...and went on rambling about turning companies that specialize on EVOS (dont see any point in that).
3) Your ignorance automatically assume a mazda cant be modded too...
ps-if stock aint a issue why not strap a rocket n bac
its2realj 2 years ago 2
actually, I'm pretty sure you can beat an EVO VIII and IX stock for stock with a Cobalt SS/TC or MS3 from a dig, as a majority of EVO drivers have no clue on how to launch their cars.... that's how I've won against them so far....
silfocus84 2 years ago
I listed those shops, in hope of you doing some actual research on hundreds of cars being put out by these shops that have simple bolt ons or upgraded turbos. I see you did no such research.
The Evo or Subaru with AWD handling will put buslengths on any Mazda Slow in a multitude of scanarios, be it gravel , snow or on a tarmac surface. This can be done in twisties or the drag race.
So compare the number of 9/10 second Evo's in your straight line ignorance of power against track prepped ones.
comp5d5 2 years ago
not any mazda mate.. i'm sure you still young and don't even seen mazda competition in rally....it were when evo and sti aren't born yet...mazda was the first japanese manufacture who use the awd in their rally car...read the history
chickenlittlebite 2 years ago
well its not hard to see why the mazda loss.. .AWD = off the line... FWD = on a roll...
its like expecting a lion to kill a great white shark in the SEA!... lol
WelcomeToPrison 2 years ago
were either one modded... if not, kudos to the EVO driver.. apparently they are hard cars to drive... just from what i've seen locally
silfocus84 2 years ago
to assert what the fellow below said, ive been to road courses around the country and see far more "high end" cars such as evos,stis,lotus,vettes,porsches, than i do mazdas. and the few times i have seen mazdas they got destroyed. im sure there are some out there that handle well. but in my 5+ years of road racing i havent seen one that was impressive by any standard.
zeroflat24 2 years ago
do you know mazda gtr and rx7 exist? have you tried that? or you barely even seen them...
chickenlittlebite 2 years ago
@chickenlittlebite im fully aware of the RX7. they are good handling cars. but with the fact that they are getting to be 10+ year old cars, and they are still rather expensive, its not often they are seen at the track.
zeroflat24 2 years ago
how is the GTR ..seen any? i love the GTR more..descendant of ms3....anyway yeah it was limited...mazda has invest in handling and AWD since 80's...when other japanese thought it a waste and costly...
chickenlittlebite 2 years ago
@chickenlittlebite the GTR is a big car, but you know its a nissan right? mazda has the MS6 which is AWD.
zeroflat24 2 years ago
haha yeah its completely impossible to see a ms3 at a real track event. wont everrr happen.
survivorsmiraculous 2 years ago
lol woot evo raped that speed3.
RANG3R2PK 4 years ago
MS3s are slow.. They race Cobalts and bone stock SRTs and for some odd reason they think they are fast..
The new SRT 4 will be faster than the MS3 and the Evo/DSMs already are. Stay in your places jrs. The 4G is still the king of the 4 bangers..
MonStar916 4 years ago
THe new SRT4 will be a Caliber. Just like the olf one was , just a neon. Man even if it is fast, how can you take pride in owning one....?
06sterling 4 years ago
And the MS3 is just a rebdaged Protege' Nothing more than a Mazda 3? What's your point. I'd take a Caliber over a Mazda 3...
But then again, Its FWD so I'll pass. Its pointless. =/
MonStar916 4 years ago
HAHA, have fun with that shitty dodge caliber. The MS3 isn't just a rebadged Protege, it's a rebadged MazdsSPEED Protege.
It isn't just a Mazda3, it's turbocharged for one thing, and has an LSD and much better suspension.
oodaddyfatsacks 4 years ago
The way you jsut descirbed the MS3s differences is the same comapred to the SRT4 except for th SRT4 gets a different interior, a much more defining differential from tis regular ounterpart, and a couple other things. ITs also turbo'd. So wtf are you talking about.. Both are POS FWDs as far as I am concerned..
MonStar916 4 years ago
I'm not comparing the SRT4. I was just mentioning that the MS3 is not just a Mazda3 or a Protege.
And yea, I heard that the Caliber is putting up some impressive numbers, but GOD it's ugly.
oodaddyfatsacks 4 years ago
I agree on it being ugly.
MonStar916 4 years ago
The Caliber-SRT4 is ugly AND hits 0-60 in the 6 second range, lol, my front wheel drive 205hp small turbocharged Saab 9-3 does 0-60 in 6.1 seconds lmao, that's not saying anything positive about the Caliber that has 285hp.
mcromance1 4 years ago
It sucks that Car and Driver just posted the specs on the new SRT 4, not 300hp like dodge was bragging about, its only 286hp, and not 300lb tq, just 260±. 0-60 is only 6.1 sec and quarter mile is 14.4. That sucks bad man, pick a new car to talk about.
Alexsered 4 years ago
Its timid times, they got horrible times with the MS3 too. But FK em both they're both slow. Who cares. If your car is FWD don't race it..
MonStar916 4 years ago
that's an insult to the evo. Why even try against an evo????????
civictypeR2007 4 years ago
I was the owner of that evo and my buddy was the speed3 driver...that was at GLD raceway. I had a turboback, CAI and Tune and it was a 05 evo and i paid 21,500 for it not 35. The speed3 had a upgraded motor mount and greddy type s bov. I ran a best 12.9 and he ran i believe a 14.2 with really soft launchs.
mustangGT375 4 years ago
BUY BUY ZOOM ZOOM!!!
genYprogressive 4 years ago
are you telling people to "buy" zoom zoom or "bye bye" zoom zoom??? lollers...freaking retard.
biggerthanlavar 4 years ago
i would hope so MS3 price = 22.8, evo price =dont know dont care but somewhere around 35, MS3 1/4 mile=14.2 evo=13.3 (stock) Id hope for the extra ten grand youd get a little more car
theaceofhearts23 4 years ago
that evo wasent stock .. and im pretty sure the ms3 was ... if the ms3 had some right mods on it im sure it would have keeped waayy closer to the evo ...
luisitotototo 4 years ago 3
Dammn! Pwned! What were the mods on both cars. The Evo was not stock.
dernemax 4 years ago
yeah, the mazdaspeed, the run before that, his rear motor mount. i dont know about the Evo
Annavp21 4 years ago
Hey, i guess im a little late here, well I was the Evo Driver and my cousin is the speed driver. I had a full Turboback and CAI and a tune and a couple other goodies, not much though, the evo was a 05 and i paid 21,500 for it not 35 grand. Yes the speed3 had an upgraded motor mount and tore it off on teh first launch, since then he got a custom solid and poly mount made for teh car.
mustangGT375 4 years ago