Added: 1 year ago
From: laroucheyouth
Views: 191,097
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (119)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • 1:07:36 WRONG! Let me make my case here because I'm simply frustrated ar such a primal dilemma in such an interesting and presumably correct video. If the train is moving through a vacuum and say its 10 meters long and the passenger is standing precisely at the 5 meter mark. When the lighting bolts strike and light/photons are given off in all directions, including towards the passenger, both photons will reach the passenger at the same time BECAUSE of the speed of light constant.

  • those neutrinos aren't travelling faster than light are they? Just want confirmation before I risk wasting my time watching this.

  • @guwest2 The jury is still out on that, but even if that ends up being the case, it in no way invalidates the discoveries Einstein made. His point wasn't that the speed of light was simply a speed limit, but that it's a principle. Watch the video. I think you will like what you learn about the personality of Einstein and his method in science.

  • holy fuck, i just watched the whole god damn video.

    ...tits at 1:36:48

  • This concept of absolute relative motion; that 'all motion is relative' is not quite right. I can think of one obvious exception: Imagine two very large cylinders in space. At first sight, you cannot tell if one is spinning on it's major axis, and the other is standing still; or vice versa. But then, if a spaceman goes inside one, he can tell right away by approaching and touching the inside wall of the cylinder, or even standing on the inside wall, because only in one will he feel 'gravity'!

  • @glutinousmaximus The relativity of non-uniform motion is that you could consider yourself stationary in a gravitational field, while an outside observer could say that you're moving through space at an accelerated rate.

  • @laroucheyouth I'm glad that this has prompted discussion. My point is that historically it has been asserted that there cannot be some frame of reference where one thing can be said to be at rest, and other things moving; or vice versa. Special relativity assumes constant 'straight line' motion, but the equations are explicit, and cannot rule out rotation - certainly not in General Relativity. We must come back to seeing this in terms of spacetime, not just space and velocity.

  • @glutinousmaximus What we're dealing with in this video in particular is the relativity of motion in relation to Special Relativity. It's a special case, dealing only with uniform linear motion, i.e. no rotation or acceleration. Non-uniform motion is what Einstein takes up in General Relativity. In fact, the reason it's common to associate rotation with a gravitational effect is because of what Einstein did with the relativity of motion in General Relativity.

  • @laroucheyouth Let's look at this a little more closely. We can imagine that the two cylinders have a similar vector, and may be moving through space alongside each other at a constant velocity. BUT conditions are different; one is rotating, and one is not. The rotating cylinder is imparting a drag on space, affecting spacetime. Within this frame of reference, we can determine the difference absolutely - regardless of constant straight-line motion.

  • @glutinousmaximus hey genius.It works only for "motion" not for "rotation"

  • @prasoonpandey2000 Well, bright person, perhaps you will explain how rotation is not motion?

  • @glutinousmaximus Ok. MISTAKE.it works only for uniform motion.not for non-uniform motion

  • @prasoonpandey2000 Hmmm. Thanks for that. I'm not certain about the uniform or otherwise velocity/motion. This goes to the heart of physics really. Concepts like inertia are involved, and who can be said to understand or explain that? We can stick labels on things, but can we truly understand them? I like Richard Feynman's approach, which is to try to quantify what nature is up to, and accept the weirdness which results.

  • @glutinousmaximus That sounds very familiar, as if I've heard or read those exact words before

  • @chrisbceltics Well, I haven't written it elsewhere. To me, it just seems obvious (although I'm well aware that much of nature is not sensible or obvious) What I'm saying is that we can treat the rotating cylinder as an absolute frame of reference within It's own spacetime domain. It's irrelevant whether It's racing through space, accelerating, decelerating, or standing still. The effects of the rotation can always be separately measured.

  • @glutinousmaximus without even reading the replies, tell me what happens when the space man, standing on the wall of the gigantic spinning cylinder, presumably where 'gravity' is felt, throws a ball relatively above him? Does the ball come back towards him or does it continue in motion in a straight line? What youre describing in your comment is centripetal force, not gravity.

  • @RbtV92 Precisely. It is a form of 'artificial gravity' if you will, but only if this hypothetical spaceman, or a ball, is in contact with the rotating wall. Nevertheless, the point remains: i.e. there are situations where the local frame of reference is absolute. You can discover by simple experiment which cylinder is actually rotating. There will, however, be relativistic effects, like space dragging. (see the Gravity Prone B as an example)

  • this place behind you is really beautifull

  • Good economic lesson here... once again showing how the British have and continue to fuck the World over time after time.

  • @gogogeedus * An eon is a division of time,an age,multiple eras A google is the highest number,an eon is the longest time,geologically.If yesterday was the day after tomorrow,and tomorrow was the day after yesterday,today would be?

  • @billy1212ist *Today is Tuesday,so yesterday is 'the day after tomorrow',or Thursday.Tomorrow is the 'day after yesterday' or Friday.Today would be? Between Thurs.& Fri.???

  • @billy1212ist no tuesday, you said it yourself

  • If today were tomorrow,and tomorrow were the day before yesterday,when is today?

  • @billy1212ist My brain hurts.

  • @billy1212ist Right now.

    

  • She names 3 periods in Human history that 'were absolutely outstanding' as the Greek Classical period, then a long dark age interrupted by developments in China and India and the Italian Renaissance.Not sure of the significance of it, but I've read that while Europe was in the Dark Ages,the Islamic M.East were miles ahead in science, medicine, astronomy, etc, not forgetting that Obama has ordered NASA to focus it's attention on 'making Islamic countries feel good about their scientific history'.

  • whats the music @ 4:55?

  • @emadhn Mozart's violin sonata, k 304, performed by Tobias Sing. One of Einstein's favorites.

  • Comment removed

  • nice job by nice young lady :p

  • !?!

  • SandustanBrasov

    A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.

  • if we could catch up to Light??--> we would Become Dark Matter' INSTANTLY...this is a proven Fact' it was Proven By The Greatest Man That EVER LIVED!!!!!--->me!!!! Yuk' Yuk' Yuk" YYYOUCHH!!!!! My EyeS!!!!!!!

  • @gogogeedus If u are right. So, why 99% and more of us has the same attitude towards reality? How all of us converting empty MATRIX platform into a reality of Earth, and whole space (in the same way and view):)

  • Brilliant young woman. Happy to see there are serious young people in the world. I am fascinated by Einstein, space, time, asronomy, etc.. I find it difficult to understand it all, because I am not very good at math. But I still find all these subjects fascinating, at 76 years old.

  • who is the woman presenting this? :)

  • @munk1790 Shawna Halevy from the LaRouche Political Action Committee. She is part of Lyndon LaRouche's scientific research team which has been nicknamed 'the basement'.

  • Boring, very long and drawn out and full of droning on and on. There's gotta be a better show of the life the Great Einstein that will be informative as well as entertaining. This shit sucks!

  • @gogogeedus One of the main implication of Einstein's theory of relativity is that even though there's different perspective of the material world, even though each person views the world with different psychological and physical filters, we can all still come to know the invariant principles acting in the universe, we can all know gravity, we can all come to know social principles, the important things. This is why Planck thought to call it a theory of the absolute, rather than relative.

  • @gogogeedus Not at all. Einstein vehemently argued against these types of interpretations. If the true reality of the world was only made up in our heads, as in a fantasy (like lord of the rings or something,) then there would be no need for science or scientist. Mind is primary in universe and what the senses convey is a false reality, but they are still dim shadows of an "objective" world of principles that our mind can interact with.

  • Why did I stop asking these questions? Um, I didn't...don't assume that people stop caring about those questions as they grow older. At least, I didn't.

  • This is awesome. thanks for uploading this :)

  • Einstein, the greatest "story maker". Never even tried to define time. There is no clear and simple definition of time, mass or matter! So how much we know about anything?!

  • An article by the same author on Einstein and his music: larouchepac(dot)com/node/20891

  • Einstein in reference to the bending of light in general relativity violating the constant velocity law said: “We might think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of relativity would be laid in the dust. But in reality this is not the case. We can only conclude that SR cannot claim an unlimited domain of validity. No fairer destiny could be allotted to any physical theory, than that it should point out the way to a more comprehensive theory, in which it lives on as a limiting case."

  • His 1st wife helped him a lot with his genius I don't care what anyone says

  • the example in the 00:37:00 minutes mark can apply to spooky action at the distance. where one person action/movement effect the other even it counter part is not moving.

  • does anyone knows the name of the music that starts playing at 0:05:00

  • @00101011011011 Mozart's violin sonata, k 304, performed by Tobias Sing. One of Einstein's favorites!

  • Relativity in psychology LOL I learnt it when I was like 5. It's called 'the golden rule' and it just says to treat others how you would like to be treated. That rule teached me empathy.

  • Only when yuo truly and passionately do what and follow what you believe in are you truly Free... perfect.

  • .

    Einstein was an impostor. Poincarré made the discovery before Einstein. But because animosity between French and German, and because of monopole of jews on newspaper and media, Poincarré is never quoted.

    .

    That is the Truth .

    .

  • 42 geniuses even have the guts to dislike it too...

  • i LOVE the internet ... wow .. years ago it would have taken me ages till i saw a video like this "somewhere"

  • this sucks...

  • I don't lik to be led.

    The author (and narrator )should keep statements (and judgements( for herself.

  • @agodfern Same to you.

  • relativism is my new next passion

  • Amazing. Beautiful. Thank you.

  • It one of the reasons why I am proud to be Jewish, I do not think there's another nation that has so many successful scientists like Jews.

  • This larouche youth thang is way on the wrong track. Einstein has been dethroned by CERN for the last time. He has been thoroughly debunked since the beginning of his flakey arm chair theories by legions of smart people.

    Walter Russell, Rudolph Steiner, Nikola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, Henry Moray, Stan Meyer are just a few of the real geniuses hidden by corporate owned psyence for control of the masses by the energy barons, war mongers and central bankers. These are the HEROES to study!

  • We Know the Whole Story and why are you telling us this?...He,s DEAD!!~O:"

  • This is a somewhat biased presentation. It has obviously been produced by someone who believes in "The Enlightenment". It was the medieval christian world that laid the foundations of modern science (this is called "Whitehead's thesis" if anyone wants to disagree with me). It also misses out the remarkable discoveries made by medieval muslim scholars, who made more scientific and mathematical discoveries in a 200 year period than the rest of preceding history combined.

  • @bayreuth79 When Justinian closed the the Academy in Athens in 529 and burned libraries it caused the Dark Ages. Scholars who suffered persicution under Justinian fled East, and took Greek classical thought with them, and they were welcomed.

  • Nice video, but to talk about the German classical period and its aftermath and yet make no mention of Hegel and Marx is to make a serious omission in the description of the history of 19th (and subsequently 20th) century Europe.

  • Very good presentation! Thank you!

  • Einstein wasn't just a genious.. he was a great poet and probly coulda been the best rapper alive.. not just at his time.. like.. EVER!!

  • science is science. it doesnt have a nationality or agenda. especially the beautiful science of newton, maxwell and of course einstein.

  • @ienjoyapples amen

  • @ienjoyapples absolutely

  • ok this was cool until it started bashing newton and maxwell because they're british.

  • @ienjoyapples Don't worry, it's not because they're British.

  • 1. “The most essential requirement is, however, that irrespective of frequency the wave or wave-train should continue for a certain interval of time, which I have estimated to be not less then one-twelfth or probably 0.08484 of a second..."

  • Einstein was chosen and promoted. "Relativity" was taken from his wife who took the whole idea from a 17th century monk who lived in her home town. Google "saint einstein" for a 2,000+ page research book on Einstein in very great detail, very great detail that you do not know and will never learn without researching for yourself. EIN is a tool, probably a distraction from Tesla science. Read anything from WILLIAM LYNNE -- WAKE UP

  • Einstein's Epistemological Credum - how do i discuss this for a PhD?

  • Einstein never had a hair-cut and never combed it either.

  • Larouche...lol...do u really wanna talk about resolving paradoxes?

  • at 1:29...which semes to be the case a lot in reality....so now we're batting for Pope Benedict XVI. It's called the Principle of Mass Deception - values gain their absolute nature by an alienating process of error. Ummm...it tells me that the person i am in love with whom i dare to meet on the other side requisites my accepting fear and uncertainty in my predicate humanity.

  • You know what?...I will aim to seduce the speaker in this video to slide down the slippery slope into "philosophy"...a "p" word almost as severe as "pedophile"...and to entertain the relationship between a mechanical explanation on the disagreements in clocks (time dilation) and the finer conceptual explanation of such disagreement and secondly, how the principle of invariance of c, could empirically affirm itself yet evading the why question as though no further principle embodied it.

  • I found the answer.

    The threshold of absolute truth is the realization that only our Maker, Himself, in person is able to pay the price to remake us again and to translate us into forever.

    There is no other truth.

    watch?v=HoKVVYJ8KJM

  • but his special relativity just got ownt

  • Einstein knew that sense perception tells you nothing!Einstein blasts Newton in the general theory you fool, sowiesosso. THIS is the real battle of ideas, in a word: Plato's cave (or mind) V.S. Aristotle's brain(computer) Are you still peevishly clinging to bestial, banal, sense-deception? Consider brain plasticity, a reflection of mind as a principle of an anti-entropic universe. Follow the narrow path for human fun: Plato,Cusa,Keple,Leibniz,Gauss­,Riemann,Einstein,Vernadsky. Will creativity.

  • It is the most complex thing for our brains: the universe.

    For the infinite is unthinkable, an incompressible and exhausting puzzle, which our brain can not interpret, that goes beyond our imagination, we'll never be able to unravel, but we can imagine, idealize, but never get anything concrete, which I call: theory nonsense.

  • Einstein was a stonecold plagiarist. Poincare, Lorentz, Boskovic and a few others deserve all the credit. The only thing Einstein added was gibberish, which science is slowly starting to reveal as such.

  • Happen to be from Germany, happen to study physics and never heard of a büso-equivalent in the US. But a bit of the habitual research and now I see what this amateur-clip (not pejorative) is all about, now I understand why i.e. Schiller is quoted inappropriately (or Bismarck showed 'positive'), now I understand the off-key transition to 'social', it's a pity, I thought it was about science and not about hubris; btw in this sense: I see Einstein's view connected in some deeper sense to Spionza.

  • Einstein helped to build atomic bomb to kill people.

    Olinto De Pretto he is credited with being the first person to derive the precise formula E=mc2 NOT Einstein.

  • Is this a joke? Why are so many facts distorted and many just plain wrong?

  • Thanks a lot for posting this.

  • The philosophy on which the theory of relativity is based and about the sort of minds that help push humanity forward is something that should be incorporated in our school systems, for this is the basis of our understanding of existence.

    I have to say that the video is long, and gets dull at some point. A lot of things could have been summarized in few short sentences without losing its emphasis.

  • @commandro Thanks for the critique, duly noted.

  • It´s kinda sad healthy vids like this does not even get close to number of views like.

    You know what I mean if not be glad for it

  • TESLA ... Now there is a genius!

  • @SimianAxiom they both are

  • doesn't ein stein mean "a stone"?

  • these are pretty good videos except that Larouche always has his lackeys keep mentioning how nasty the British are. I don't think I ever known of anyone who was so pathologically anglophobic as Larouche

  • nice video. I see the proces of seeking the truth merely as a paradigm shift. Letting go off certain assumptions and prejudice. The ultimate building-plan of the mind and the reality we perceive is already established. It rests upon every individual to find it. This is also what Newton did: he composed a system of calculations to comprehend/describe what he saw. There is no contradiction between Einstein and Newton, there is only a perceived contradiction based upon senses. All is one.

  • Albert was wrong and he knew it.

  • @BrodyLuv2 just because he said he was wrong latter in life doesnt mean he was wrong for the time. and just because he did nothing latter in life doesnt mean he stole all the work from his dead wife.

  • @BrodyLuv2 go back to the church and change the world with your hands together. oh right, that never worked out.

  • @BrodyLuv2 He wasnt wrong, he just didnt see everything, but what he saw for his time was just phenominal. He is 100% spot on in what he said in general relativity - it just needs explaining WHY.

  • @BrodyLuv2 !!

  • @BrodyLuv2 you've never studied relativism, and you know it.

  • @DariaProductions Relativsm works for big objects, we now need to combine it with quantum physics and find quantum gravity, that will require another genius. another strong, self-thinking independent spirit.

  • @Etrajbe The most beautiful thing about science is that it's never ending, the universe will never be completely figured out in one neat formula, putting all later scientist out of a job. Hence, being a scientist is about a method of perfection, not a pursuit of eternally correct facts.

  • She's sharp. good work. good video.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more