Added: 4 years ago
From: xembryo
Views: 36,704
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (202)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Jesus name be praised, everyone who is drawn to Him, or to any of the sites about HIm, it is not an accident, the Father is drawing you to His Son...

  • why do you unbelievers even waste your time checking out vid's like this.....if you don't believe why criticize the believer's..it's called human rights.. you cry like babies when people make racist slurs or put down the gays....seriously! I don't get it

  • You know there are a ton of people who say they have been abducted by aliens and that they have seen ufos, and intelligent people give more credit to that now than an invisible man in the sky. I'm gonna start a website and charge 5 bucks to join and I will prove the existance of god, which would be me if you payed your 5 dollars, you would then be my bitch and I could draw a big face in a pile of dirt and you morons can use that as evidence. Your genitalia is proof you create people, not god.

  • @BAKEROUERTANI Thats because Jesus was from israel.

  • @xembryo HEY YOUR RIGHT HERES SOMEMORE INFO ON IT LOOK ON HERE FOR THIS VIDEO,

    "SLANG IN THE BIBLE"

  • The carbon 14 dating has been proven flawed, so in turn proving that it could be at least 2000 years old to rebuttle the argument the Fitchpatrick is saying. We may desire comfort, don't you? Fairy Tale you call, but you are the skeptic that decides what to choose and not choose to believe in science since that is the way you are oriented. Look at all the facts. That is all I'm saying.

  • Comment removed

  • JESUS WASNT A CRACKER

  • @xembryo how is jesus god if god was the one that gave the virgin mary the seed of jesus?

  • @MoneyMaloney Its like a fictional story. It doesn't all have to make sense.

  • Did they find some of his DNA? The Y chromosome would indicate god's genetic code.

  • @grubelsucht If you were god, Would you let us have that information?

  • @a2zhandi First of all, I made a serious error in suggesting that this supposed supernal intelligence was male with a Y chromosome. My comment would also imply that the sky person had parents and thus a birth and the laughable idea that Jesus was his son. Zeus had children, but Jehovah god was obviously a homosexual. Were there god DNA, however, it might be used to convict him of crimes against humanity, leading to a swift execution by stoning. Happily, though, god is already dead.

  • its one thing with jesus really existing and another to believe rediculous stories about the world creation and jesuses creation of people, white and black so they can hate, rite?

    or did the white people write that ~.,~?

  • @WingedSoulies Jesus is not God. He is the son of God according to Christians anyways. And God made people in his image but gave people the power of choice. So what people choose to do has nothing to do with God. People choose to hate other people based on the color of their skin, their ethnicity, culture, religion.

  • @NiC0TV GesuCristo did born from a virgen girl; HE has all the authority of GOD, IT has the judment in his hands, also the power to give life, all is under his will except The Father; But Jesus & God are only one, the Spirit of God is of Jesus too ( read Sn John ),, the Son of God is God.( Verb was God), if you believe this....you`ll scape from the power of antichrist ( The JewSatanism )

  • @tracioful maybe thats true, then again, if jesus really rosed from his grave, doesnt that seem "evil" although thats the wrong word but u know

    then again whos the morons who said he was god O.o?

    the bible? or the church?

  • Comment removed

  • i still don't understand how people back in that time even believed jesus and his "prophetic" words. i mean he isn't god, and if he was something holy then he would only be a prophet. a prophet is like moses or muhammed.

  • People believe in fairy tales because they give them comfort.  The Shroud of Turin has been proved to be much younger that the time of Christ.

  • Actions of their future descendants. Take Russia or example. At this point their country and ours do not get along very well. But look back to world war 2. The Russians were a vital ally of ours against Nazi Germany. Yet we do not blame the Russians of the 1940's for the actions of the Russians of the 21st century

  • @ sexy melon actually we can tell alot about Jesus by reading the bible. And if u believe that its also fiction then u can at least have a part in this argument when u have another "fictional" book that is over 1000 pages long, has existed for over 2000 years and has more evidence of existence than any other ancient document ever found. The main thing about Jesus that we don't know about, was his appearance. And Jesus was not a terrorist. U can not blame the past citezens of a country for the

  • Idiots.

    The modern image of Jesus is that of a Michaelangelo's brother. Why? Because he was the painter. No one knows how Jesus looked (it's hard to know much about a fictional character, really).

    If you want historical Jesus, try a short, stubby, ugly poor brown middle-eastern person. You know, the kind the world's most pious nation has been bombing since 2001.

  • @xembryo Actually Jesus is not God, God is the father of Jesus.

    But i still don't care who's who.

  • It has been proven that the Tarin Shroud was faked by da Vinci. But you may believe what you please.

  • The fact remains we don't know exactly what this is and where/when it came from. To say it is Jesus is entirely too premature and just flat out ignorant.

  • Why god create peoples like you? Retarded idioit

  • @xembryo why god create peoples like Osama

  • In my eyes, jesus looks like a tall dave chappelle with long dreadlocks and rough bread. Yeah....i like that :)

  • I found Jesus on a pop tart and also in my alphabet soup, I also saw him in a shop one day and he was buying a tootsie Roll! He is friends with Elvis and M J too! And they are recording a song together called "Jesus was Black and Jacko was White and Elvis says thanks for the Mamory"

  • @xembryo Too bad god's a fairy tale.

  • @z0mby how do you know the Bible is bs? To be BS for over 2000 years is a slap in the face of highly intelligent people who have risked their lives to present it's message.

  • @aiden9003 Because it's core message is illogical, plain and simple. The only reason you believe in the bible is because you were told to by somebody, the same reason a child believes in the tooth fairy. And somebody risking their life over something that defies rationality does not sound like somebody who is intelligent, at all.

  • @aiden9003 A lot of prominent philosophers, war heroes and famous politicians and civil activists defended slavery also, but that's no reason for tolerating that bullshit either, is it?

    All it tells us is that people are just as gullible as they were 2,000 years ago. Not a big surprise. Secular tendencies have only really taken off mere centuries ago, marvelously coincidentally with the largest leap in scientific and social progress, hm...

  • @SexyMelon ....stop

  • @fatsanta05 Truth is harsh when you've listened to too many lies, but there's no other way to present it. Would you really rather live a lie?

  • @SexyMelon i was just saying that cause you were getting really heated im not christian

  • @fatsanta05 That's fair enough. There are indeed things in the world more worth getting worked up about.

  • @z0mby Well there have also been cases when people died and came back to life of them seeing heavan itself look it up on the other videos on here if you still don't believe then GL

  • @aiden9003 Its called a near death experience, you're telling me that proves the bible? If that's honestly your best argument then you must be incredibly delusional. A near death experience does not prove anything, on top that, near death experiences are theorized to be DMT being released from your brain. DMT being a naturally occurring hallucinogenic drug. And that explanation makes much more sense than "derr it wus yer spirit going up to god der derr"

  • @aiden9003 Obviously a half-dead comatose hallucinating person is the one most fit to judge nature of reality.

    Of course, that argument also fails in that, even if it did prove there's a heaven... There's a over a hundred thousand "heavens" humanity has invented, and at least a couple million more one could imagine, so no road to any deity you may have in mind.

  • @xembryo how many people does it take you to kill before you are called a bad guy.. Osama is EVil his blood shall not be spared..........

  • I have a photo of Jesus that my uncle took in 1948. He's a little older in the picture, but it's definitely him. Do you have any other photos of Jesus?

  • @xembryo

    JESUS CAN T BE A GOD HE IS A CREATION OF GOD LIKE ME YOU AND OUSSAMA ALL THE CREATURES IN THIS EARTH AND IN THIS UNIVER AND IF YOU SAY THAT GOD IS LIKE US (JESUS') THERE IS OTHER CREATIONS MORE COMPLICATED AND SO BIG

    GOD IS ONE AND UNIQUE NO ONE LIKE HIM WE CAN T MAGINE THE IMAGE OF GOD WITH OUR MIND WHO IS THE CREATION OF GOD TO EVERY THING IN YOU IS A CREATION OF GOD

  • @BAKEROUERTANI There are no more complication than the Human body.. dont bother and even if there was that wont make an argument that Jesus was not GOd

  • the true face of jaques de molay the last templar grand master, given to the church by the family of his friend jeffery de charnier years after demolays death. the image comes from acid excreted by demolays exhausted but still alive body after the church tortured him in the same way as jesus and crucified him on a door frame. he was wrapped in the shroud to complete the torture. Demolay was burned to death by the church several years after the torture.

  • why do people bother to put skin on our god. God is of spirit!!

  • I am a Belgium citisen and i visited a church in Duffel (Flanders) where on the outside wall is a stone. That stone has the image of a count (family member of an old very important family named 'De Merode'. The face on that big stone in the church wall look EXACTLY like the face on the Turin Shroud! I think there is a big possibility that it is the image of that man in Duffel, Belgium that is on the Turin Shroud what was made in the mid-ages, maybe by Leonardo Da Vinci, also from Flanders!

  • according to an article i read from Readers Digest a long time ago. They allowed a team of scientist to examine this shroud of turin and the blood turned out to be an animal blood. The blood is what made the image on the cloth. After the report was publish, they do not want anymore test to be done with it. They actually thought that it would prove the authenticity of this shroud but the reverse of it happened.

  • watch?v=T5aIi3OqOJU

  • @doomsword86 oh my what an idiot. from 1800 you say. you know nothing of the shroud's history.

  • The weave pattern and method of making the cloth is MEDIEVAL.

    The ancient weave methods did not have the technology nor the pattern evident in the Turin shroud!

  • @MikeWhiskyTango Actually if you watch the new documentary the researchers found out that the parts that they cut were actually interwoven with medieval cloth because it was burned and they needed to repair it.

  • now i see this video and he looks just like i dreamed him. with a very thin face, protruding cheekbones and looked like a homesless man with a long beard as long as his hair. incredible that i dreamed him like this last year, before i ever saw this picture of the shroud. the image on the shroud looks like Jesus in the dream i had where i watched him preach to the people. i remember thinking in my dream "wow! he looks nothing like the pictures they paint of him..."

  • Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.

    Amen

  • Come and see my video about the shroud of Turin !!!

  • Thank you!

  • I don´t know, i can´t say its the Shroud of Christ, Its like saying Pigs can fly u can´t know, he looks like him, in some ways beard wounds, he looks tourcherd, and if thats right what i heard in the Docu then it isn´t proved yet that its Jesus Himself, the only thing i can say is the Shroud Exist but Jesus Followers could have buried it away, or placed into a Place not be found yet...

  • it hasnt been proven its the photo of jesus crist.Also you got this photo from the shroud of turin...

  • wow this was uploaded exactly 2 years ago today and is that jeaus b4 he died on the cross the last pic i mean

  • You know,

    We've also got a lot of clichés about you, Americans: Obese human veals chewing bad food while driving enormous, ridiculous, trucks with a Bible on one hand and a shotgun on the other hand...

    But that's stupid, man.

  • Join Jesus fan club - "Jesus Is My Best Pal"

  • it is not the face of jesus, if you read scripture you will find that when they tortured him they pulled out his beard. they face on the cloth still has his bearde.

  • You were there?

    Whaow.. Me too, I was he one who was lauching stones at him.

    Usually I get bored at cricifixions, but dis was a funny one.

  • you can be ok if you want.

  • I really dont understand (I m not a native english speaker..)

  • LOL!!! and yet you try to talk in her in my native language like you know what is going on?

  • Jesus native language was Aarameean, not English... so what's the matter?

  • how do you know? were you there?

  • aaaand YES I KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON:

    nothing.

  • yes, that is what is going on in your head!

  • I want meat meeeeat.

  • then kill your camel, arise and eat.

  • actually they shaved him with a Wilkinson Sword (TM) and Hugo Boss (TM) after-shave

  • and you can still be ok, if you want.

  • I don´t think they pulled of his Beard because uhm, in every Picture or on the Cross, Jesus been shown with a Beard means they didnt pulled it off, but i cant say i wasn´t in the Croud who Screamed "Let the Murder Free" and "Cross the Son of God"!

  • it tells in the book of isaiah that they pulled off his beard, and the crowd did not call him son of God because they believed, they were calling him son of god to mock him.

  • Yep :), sorry didn´t know that...., and i know they did it becuase they wanted to moke him.

  • How do you know what Jesus looked like?

  • Sometimes he loved to be dressed in leather pants (He said that was "cool", but sorry for Him, in fact everybody tought that was "gay"..)

  • so you were "tought" that?

  • haha i m not a native speaker that's easy to see

  • LOL!!!actually i just thought you were retarded!! LOL!!!

  • I m a french writer and I think it would take you more than one life to master french language as I do, my dear... You Americans aren't alone in the world.

    PS: I'm not retarded. But people which see Jesus' face on the coulds ARE RETARDED FOOLS

  • FRENCH!?! that explains why you are so slow!! LOL!!! one of the very few retarded people in the world. french language can't be that hard if YOU mastered it!! LOL!!! HA!HA!HA!

  • haha frogs haha cheeses

    haha I see Jesus in a cloud..

    what a level of thinkin

  • YEP! FRENCH! is it true that france smells like pee?

  • actually fench perfumes are made about it

  • french perfumes smell like pee? yea, i can see it.

  • PLUS we get a shower once a month

  • LOL!!! yea, i guess even french pigs need to bath once in awhile.

  • Yes..yes it is true

  • LOL!!!

  • That guy who was saying bad stuff about french hope you were'nt affended.

  • The face on the shroud belongs to Hulk Hogan

  • Alright. But it says "not lying with the linen clothes." That is the Shroud.

  • Watch Dr. Scott Debunking the Shroud of Turin. How the shroud is completely unbiblical in the scripture it says Jesus' head was buried with a napkin, but when you look at the shroud of turin it one complete sheet. It is completely not biblical.

  • No such comment in the Bible about a "napkin."

  • John 20:7

    And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.

  • The "napkin" is the face cloth that was used to soak up blood and fluid which came up through the nose.

    Google the Sudarium of Oviedo, and you'll understand why it is the face cloth mentioned.

    cheers!

  • "The Turin Shroud was faked by Renaissance artist Leonardo da Vinci using pioneering photographic techniques and a sculpture of his own head"

  • That's not the truth, but you may believe what you want

  • likewise :)

  • @xembryo Sathya Sai Baba took a photo of the shroud of Turin from a woman and in moments gave it back to her. What it became was the most famous picture of what is believed to be the person of whom the shroud is regarded.

    watch?v=A4Jkw9b8AJY

  • @Gypsy085 - are you saying the concept of photography was invented and then forgot about for the next 500 years til it was rediscovered. The freemasons lied to you about the date of the shroud- sorry it is Jesus. Try to update your knowledge on this, it may help you believe. This image on the cloth was hidden for years.

  • @helenw100 Jesus is a fairy tale, but thanks for playing. No prize for you. lmao

  • @Gypsy085 Total Crock, another useless post by an uneducated, lazy person, who does not take the time to investigate properly.The Shroud was created hundreds of years before LDV, not to mention LDV did not have the talent or patience to pull something like this off.Please question what you see or read or watch and research the facts, thank-you.

  • @Flagrum3 yeah, ok

  • @Flagrum3 Thank you, for another moronic post.

  • @castletriglav Moronic? Why? If you believe that LDV could have created the Shroud image, you sir are a Moron...Have you studied the scientific facts about the Shroud? Have you any true knowledge on LDV and his art? I would suspect not, from your comment.ANYONE who has watced a 'video' or read an 'article' on Leonardo creating the Shroud, please do yourselfs and everyone else a favour and do some 'REAL' research before commenting.IT was and is Imposible for LDV to have created the Shroud period.

  • @Gypsy085 There was no proof for that since then. so don't make this sound like its a fact.

  • @Gypsy085 If you look at the shroud, the head on it was decapitated. There is a gap between the head and neck. Christ was not decapitated. Also, carbon dating puts the shroud much later than the time of Christ. Anyone who does research can figure this one out. I'm glad you did! :)

  • @MotorCityKitty79 The gap can be accounted for with the secondary wrap around his head. The carbon dating can be explained by the fact that when they took the sample they took it from an area that was repaired later. Things are not always as simple as black and white. The earliest picture (painting) known of the shroud pre-dates the carbon dating results.

  • si e lui.dico di si perche mi e aparso nell sogno giorni dopo mi ha dimostrato che lui ha dato la vita per protegere la mia famiglia.grazieeeeeeeeeeeeeeee­eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • The scientists that worked on Carbon dating were the same that "proved the Dingo baby" in Australia. They were proven wrong in the Australia case some 20 years later, so gee guys, don't worry about science at ALL! Ha Ha!!

  • i have that picture its a little broken

  • im a witness of jesus christ . your paint stories will not work with me . thats jesus! i know his voice and power . thats him. carbon dating was wrong it was taken from a part of the shroud which had been repaired 800 years ago . the rest is from his time.

  • 3.1 Corinthians 11:14

    Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him,

    1 Corinthians 11:13-15 (in Context) 1 Corinthians 11 (Whole Chapter)

    4.1 Corinthians 11:15

    but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering.

  • YA, i heard it was paint and they carbon dated this thing to only about 800 years. Isnt it amazing the bullshit people will believe...amazing

  • YES...yes it is

  • ALL LIES..Its painted..YES, it is....

  • hahaha.....suuuuuuure its paint.

  • ALL LIES..Its painted..YES, it is....

  • keep saying that to yourself.

  • OK..ITS PAINT..they have looked at it under a microscope...its paint. You Brainwashed Cultists who WANNA think it something elese, OK but its paint

  • lol..

    No it is not. There was only ONE scientist out of the legions of scientists who have studied this, who said it was paint, and that was Walter McCrone.

    Not only was his "finding" never duplicated by ANYONE, his own research assistant said he was full of shit.

    There is UNANIMOUS agreement that the image of the Shroud is made of decomposed cellulose fibers. Its like a scorch, only one producing a photo negative and a 3 dimensional image of a guy.

  • you can say I 'want to" see what I see, but that is only what psychologists call "projection".

    In order to deal with the internal inconsistency of your own blatant self-deception, you project it onto me as a way to cope.

    I suppose Los Alamos Labs, or "Nature" online, or U. Nebraska, or London Journal of Optics, or Thermochemical Acta, etc, etc, ETC.....ALL "want to see" what they see, right?

    lol

  • It's interesting to see the arguing going on about Jesus and what He looked like. Unless someone painted His picture or took a snapshot of Him while He walked this earth, how in heavens name are we suppose to know what He looked like? The Shroud Of Turin shows an image but an image of who? There again how do you know if that was Jesus if no one knew what He looked like?

  • its not that hard to take an educated guess.

    a guy with long hair, big eyes (not chinese), tall, with beard, etc.

    His hair is straight, so he aint black.

    so what else do we have?

    seeing as how Jesus was a JEW, my guess would be that he had brown hair and brown eyes.

    shouldn't be that hard to imagine.

  • .......unless you think moses looked like charleton heston.

  • The other thing that we have is that Jesus was buried in "burial cloths" not a single sheet or shroud. One glaring and obvious fact that the so-called experts tend to over look. "Then took they the body of Jesus, and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury" (John 19:40 KJV) "Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves" (Luke 24:12 KJV)

    So what else do we have? Guess work.

  • Do your own research.

    The third piece of cloth found in the tomb is apparently a long strip taken from the shroud of turin, used to help wrap the man in the shroud, and then later resown onto the main cloth.

    Lol. do "research" on what ancient jews looked like. Hmmm....lets see, they must have been irish looking...or chinese...or black.

    Egyptian hyroglyphs and papyrus shows us what folks right next door looked like, as do roman mosaics and greek frescoes.

    statues etc also help.

  • persian and assyrian reliefs help out too.

    as do minoan frescoes, etc.

    for christ's sake, dipshit, there is PLENTY of evidence which fleshes out the picture.

    spare me your pompous pretension, ok?

  • Your personal attacks on me make you look silly and takes away what little credibility you may have had.

  • There was a third piece of cloth in the tomb and was "apparently a long strip taken from the shroud?. Exactly where did you gather this information from? This supposed third piece was found by whom and recorded by whom? Who sewed the it back on to the main cloth? What historical documents did you gather this information from? Is this recorded in Scripture anyplace?

    Sources would help in a big way here.

  • there is a thin piece of the shroud of turin which was removed and RESOWN onto the cloth. that is a fact...seams dont lie.

    it is speculated that this might have been the third piece, seeing as how the main body of the shroud would be piece 1, the sudarium of oviedo piece 2.

    after all, where ELSE would this thin strip of cloth have been? Its part of the original fabric, after all.

    Look at the BBC documentary on the Shroud....if you actually care to listen to anyone but yourself.

  • "Look at the BBC documentary on the Shroud...."

    Because the program appeared on BBC, it doesn't mean it automatically becomes absolute truth, but rather, it reflects the beliefs of the producers of that particular show. An inprint of a man who looked like most of the people of that area and of that time only means it was a human male, nothing more.

  • The next logical step to take because there are no photos or painting of Christ, would be to research old coins, etchings on tablets, etc, to see what the Jews of Jesus time looked like. That would eliminate much of the guess work and artistic incense that the European artists took because they felt that Jesus should look that way. Did they have long thin faces and straight hair? What do non-mixed Jews look like today? Don't guess, do some research.

  • That is not Jesus, that's a picture of Hulk Hogan.

  • שלום ישוע!!!!

    Yeshua Shalom!!!!

  • Ancient Jewish non-Biblical writings also indicate that it was their custom to wash the body and to use spices, but not to preserve or embalm the body as some claim; rather, as the Talmud says, The spices are to remove the bad smell. Such preparation of the corpse was not forbidden even on the Sabbath; as the Mishnah (2nd century C.E.) says: They may make ready [on the Sabbath] all that is needful for the dead, and anoint it and wash it.—Shabbath 23:5.

  • Even the professed Christian writers of the third and fourth centuries, many of whom wrote about a host of so-called miracles in connection with numerous relics, did not mention the existence of a shroud containing the image of Jesus. This is hard to understand, since 15th- and 16th-century viewers, according to Jesuit scholar Herbert Thurston, describe the impressions on the shroud as so vivid in detail and colouring that they might have been quite freshly made.

  • In addition, consider this: If the graveclothes of Jesus had his image upon them, does it not seem that it would have been noticed and would have become a subject for discussion? Yet, beyond what is in the Gospels, there is complete silence in the Bible about the graveclothes.

  • What did Peter find when he came shortly afterward and entered the tomb? The eyewitness John reported: He viewed the bandages lying, also the cloth that had been upon his head not lying with the bandages but separately rolled up in one place. (John 20:6, 7) Notice that there is no mention of the fine linen only of bandages and the headcloth. Since John specifies the bandages and the headcloth, would it not seem likely that he would have mentioned the fine linen or shroud, if it had been there?

  • The Jews customarily washed the dead and then used oils and spices to anoint the body. (Matthew 26:12; Acts 9:37) On the morning following the Sabbath, women friends of Jesus intended to complete the preparation of his body, which had already been laid in a tomb. However, when they arrived with their spices to grease him, the body of Jesus was not in the tomb!—Mark 16:1-6; Luke 24:1-3.

  • The Gospel writers say that the body of Jesus, after being taken from the stake by Joseph of Arimathea, was wrapped in clean fine linen. (Matthew 27:57-61; Mark 15:42-47; Luke 23:50-56) The apostle John adds: Nicodemus also . . . came bringing a roll of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pounds of it. So they took the body of Jesus and bound it up with bandages with the spices, just the way the Jews have the custom of preparing for burial.—John 19:39-42.

  • news from Pakistan,

    This morning, from a cave somewhere in Pakistan , Taliban Minister of Migration, Mohammed Omar, warned the United States that if military action against Afghanistan continues, Taliban authorities will cut off America 's supply of convenience store managers.

    And if this action does not yield sufficient results, cab drivers will be next, followed by Dell and AOL customer service reps., and then Motel 6 managers.

    It's getting ugly...........

  • Having a long hair was a custom and a tradition between the Galileans, it's was a vow given to God not to cut the hair.

    Jesus and John the disciple were Galileans, and both used to have a long hair.

  • tandrus7 said:

    The Romans and Greeks had short hair and clean cut looks. See the statues and busts. Many of the Jews were hellenized and took on the customs of the Romans and Greeks, but God said in the OT "do not take on the customs of the pagans." Yeshua more than likely had long hair and a long beard. It says they plucked his beard. I like the Turin image which was left behind by the Shekinah glory of the Son of God.

  • Look at ancient mozaics and paintings of Jewish people. There are not too many. In all of them, the hair is very short. This is because it is a hsame for a man to have long hair.

  • Jesus could not have had long hair. Jews did not wear it excet during a ritual and the bible says it is a shame for a man to have long hair.

    That's all there is to it.

  • how long was long hair back then though? It looks like shoulder length. Women probably had it longer than that.

  • The Shroud of Turin cannot be an image of Jesus Christ. The man in the image has long hair. Jesus Christ did not. We know this because Paul states long hair is a shame for men, and Paul's words were inspired by the Holy Ghost. If it is a shame for men to have long hair, Jesus could not have had long hair. Thus, the shroud is not an image of Him.

  • Your wrong, but I won't argue with you about it.

  • Nonsence. The Bible tells us it's a shame for a man to have long hair. Jesus can't be the image in the shoud therefore.

    It's simply. You can't get around that by denying scripture. It does not work.

  • The Romans and Greeks had short hair and clean cut looks. See the statues and busts. Many of the Jews were hellenized and took on the customs of the Romans and Greeks, but God said in the OT "do not take on the customs of the pagans." Yeshua more than likely had long hair and a long beard. It says they plucked his beard. I like the Turin image which was left behind by the Shekinah glory of the Son of God.

  • its Da vinci and if its not it definately isnt what you religious dickheads think haha

  • It's funny that in all these years nobody has even come close to reproducing this despite wanting to prove it's a fraud. Also the image is three dimensional. Lastly the carbon dated piece of the shroud was proven recently by the original scientist before he died, to be a piece of a patch added many years later to the shroud to cover damage. This scientist said the people were full of crap until he proved it to himself that they did use the wrong piece to carbon date.

  • Why don't you believe that I saw the Jesus.  I even got attack by the devils. I even so event of 911. All this is true and I don't lie because my love for our Lord.

  • Most important: believe the Word of God..Jesus IS the Word of God

  • Jesus Came in Flesh and Our Early Christian know what he looked like.

  • what a wonderfull face:)(L)jesus my life

  • Oh, I forgot. Leonardo Da Vinci made it.

    ha ha ha ha...

    The same guy who designed planes that couldn't fly, and boats that couldn't navigate, somehow creates this thing way back when, while modern scientists can DREAM of doing the same, and thats WITH having something to go by.

    No hay mas sordo que el que no quiere escuchar.

    There is none so deaf as he who refuses to listen.

  • I saw Jesus in my dream he was about 6 feet tall wearing whte gown, he had a weavy shoulder length.

  • teresasfsol, that's the real Jesus that you saw in your dream.

    Jesus is very tall, and has a weavy shoulder lenght hair, and mostly dressed in white.

    Check " Video Musical del Programa Divina Misericordia " on Youtube, and see if it's the same Jesus you saw in your dream.

    The picture in that video is the same picture Saint Faustina painted when Jesus appreared to her.

  • The shroud is genuine. A photo negative? When photography hadn't been invented yet, and no one would appreciate the effort until the late 19th Century? Perfect 3-D image? Ancient weaving type? Perfect medical pathology info? Marks matching Gospels, and known Roman whips? Carbon Dating now proven to be invalid (see Los Alamos Labs)? What more can you possibly ASK for? This isn't your run of the mill bogus relic. Modern science cant come to GRIPS with this thing. Wake up, folks.
  • Of course its not a photograph of Jesus,but its the equivalent of,say,19th Century early black and white photography,particularly when this shroud was less creased and weathered and worn.The Shroud is authentic,I reckon.

  • This only proves that there is one born every minute....