Added: 4 years ago
From: alvesdosreis2007
Views: 10,068
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • He basically says that the mccanns confessed to what adds up as neglect, which is a crime, and nothing else. He also complains about how big a deal people made of the whole arguidos thing, which is normal in portugal.

  • sooouuuuper is a PEDOPHILE ,PARENTS BEWARE.

  • you lying portuguese bastard

  • @mrarches anyone who doesnt agree with ya h lame ass is a liar - u mr arches is a small pricked pedophile

  • @sooouuuuper is a pedophile,parents beware.

  • @mrarches is a pedophile, parents beware

    mrarches is a lame ass everyone beware

  • Pt-3 ---- (cont)

    "...what the McCanns admitted in the Police station, of leaving unattended very little children would be enough in Portugal for a prosecution and conviction and losing their other two kids too."

    END OF TRANSLATION

  • Pt-2

    MAKE INTERVIEWEE (left) 0:38 "That ios the question to ask. One day this whole story will have to be writen and all those details. You see,one thing is police matters and the other is POLITICS and politicians... I do not say that there was any form of favouritism but there is definitely some form of SOLIDARITY, INSTANT SOLIDARITY. With a lot less than what the McCanns admitted to have done (neglecting thir kids everynight for 2 weeks) many people in Portugal have been prosecuted for "

  • Let me translate what the female Portuguese TV presenter and her guests say:

    Pt-1

    FEMALE TV PRESENTER: "People in Portugal and in England keep asking...'If it was a Portuguese or an English married couple with three tiny kids and one went missing presumed dead due to the parents neglect, the other two kids would be removed and the parents prosecuted, even where the parents went to work instead of going out to dine with friends'. Why not the McCanns ?!"

  • @MystiffDawn yes they would be charged - but how would it be for 2 doctors to be in jail for neglect of their children - how would that look ??

    i think the politics have really been played out here - kate the sloan ranger and her cardiologist husband - mmmmm that wouldd never do - if theyhad been the dustmans kids they would have definetly taken them no questions and they would have been charged with the murder lon b4 now

  • @oldbag699 she's hardly a sloane ranger! More a scally from Liverpool. This case makes me feel sick. Surely something must happen?

  • Why did Gerry and Kate have POLICE ONLY CEOP book's about how Police question parent's of abducted children in their apartment prior to being made El Guidos!!!

    Let's see who mark's this FACT as Spam!!!

  • @KaOssis regarding the CEOP books, how do you know this?

  • @levanter1M, didn't you see the official Portugese police vid showing Gerrys bedside draw and the books all over it, cause many people did, and also of the Parkinsons disease tab's that Kate had in her bedside draw that were perscribbed by another McCann in Liverpool... funny how drugs always seems to pop up in this case, especially by the way Kate and Gerry look, they must be full of opioids, lol. 

  • @KaOssis wierd and frankly disturbing. any noise on how the NSY review is progessing? Can't find anything...

  • @levanter1M, NSY?

  • @KaOssis Sorry - New Scotland Yard - Operation Grange.

  • @levanter1M, oooh, got you know, lol Apparently, the Metropolitan Police are treating the case as “potential murder” not an abduction, which was classified as homocide when the case was shelved byt he Portugese police so nothings changed about the way the police see the case as, so say's alot about the McCann's dosn't it!

  • @KaOssis have you heard anything at all regarding the ongoing case?

  • @levanter1M, about as much as you know, cause since the Met monkeys have begun a review of the case that occured in another country, ie; out of their jurisdiction and illegal, the McCann's are probably partying on the £3.5 million public money laundered through to their fake Madeleine and just a product fund! As if no one could guess Kate's book is a pile of prefabricated piss and they're robbing the taxpayers coffer on the inside of the civil services, that's what they always do!

  • @levanter1M, the McCann's still havn't registered Madeleine as a missing person in the UK, and that's why they made her a Ward of Court, to stop the UK law system from registered the kid as missing and to keep their hands in the taxpayers and sympathy nuts pockets, cause if God was a judge in front of the McCann's in a court, he'd laugh his socks off at their shit, cause I would!

  • The application made by the McCann's AFTER they screamed that Madeleine was abduted some week's earlier, stated that Madeleine is living with them at their home in Rothley, and that's on Official Court Record's, so how did they prove where Madeleine was living to get the WOC application passed in a Court of Law then? Seem's like the British legal sytem is mentally fucked, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!

  • The McCanns are likely murderers and possible paedophiles

  • Sorry, David Icke's Forums, just got the name McCann before Icke, lol.

  • Have you read any of David McCann's forum about Gerry being a Freemason satanist? Someone's refered to Madeline as being a clone, and related to the bloodline of Christ or genetically engineered to be persect, and they think Madeline is going to miraculously come back from the dead, or something to that effect; but all I get is IVF embryos can be mutliple embryos if you keep taking one embryo every time it splits into two, amnd looking at all those diffeent Madeline piccies beg's answers!

  • Well, arn't all ritualistically sacrificed children disposed of the same as abused children, especially in Freemasonry where they got their family member's in the Police and Social Services to cover up evidence and change the paperwork for them!

  • 'Thumb UP.' Yes to those who thumbed this down, just check your FACTS. See infowars/ Brian Gerrish CHILD STEALING STATE or same vid on here.

  • Too right LaPieinsky, I got evidence that the social services have been kinapping children for year's, and all of themm are being sexually abused by their foster parent's, it's a fact, the entire public paid for system is infected!

  • It could be a sacrifice but im more inclined to believe that in this case it was merely the disposal of an abused child. But its one or the other.

  • The anti-mccann people on here are fucking nuts,,maddie was sacrificed?W T Fuck.

  • WellIf you knew more of history of the Black Moore's and the Freemason father's habit of making their daughter's their Sacrificial Scapegoat for a win in a war taken by a vow written in the Bible, then you'ed know why Kate and Jer paid a private clinic in Birmingham UK for envitro fertilisation of another man's child, ie; Jer's brother John, to use her as a mean's of making money, when they were less than a year married, you'ed know what they really did to her in Prai De Luz!

  • Comment removed

  • if it did'nt cross thier mind for one second that they had to worry about someone abducting thier children then why was the first thing that kate screamed out was they've taken her

  • Good point truthfilter!

    Also, if it was so safe, why bother checking at all?

  • do your homework people read the facts donht spread lies from what u have heard read the actuall official documen ts wich contain evidence

  • Paulo Cristóvão é o exemplo do policia profissional e honroso que infelizmente a nossa PJ não soube manter!Parabens pelo seu trabalho enquanto inspector!

  • i dont know i would like to know what is said if anyone can explain i would like to know to

  • er, i think i missed this, what does this say in english? is there a post someone can direct me too that says??

  • No matter how you look at the McCanns, they are guilty of leaving their children unattended. It revolts me fact that they try to find excuses: "But nobody would expect a kidnapper to snatcher her". They are "doctors", for God sake! They shouldn't fear kidnappers but ACCIDENTS! That's problem what happened!

  • @matosvideotube oh yes,the kids could have stuck their fingers in a socket! or burned the apartment down!!.toddlers get into everything! they put things in their mouth they shouldnt and when they dont get their own way they scream blue murder!! funny how their kids were really quiet and well behaved,even while being abducted!

  • Yeah pick up the phone and ask British Government to stop interfering into this criminal matter, phone Mr Mitchell and ask him just to shut up as everyone is tired listening to him, please phone British Social Services demanding them to condemn McCanns conduct as an example of negligent parenting, phone Sky News and British newspapers demanding a fair coverage of the story and finally give a call to McCanns and tell them to confess!

  • Due to thousands of phone calls (to God) we do know now the results of forensics. Finnaly the Birmingham lab released them. Bear on my mind why both BBC and SKYnews were so discret on their 'breakink news'. Guess...so, here they are:

    1- The fluids/blood found on the Renault are 100% SURE/NO DOUBT Maddie's.

    2- The blood found on the Ocean club apartment is 100% SURE/NO DOUBT Maddie's

    HEY CLARENCE SPIN THIS!!!!!!!!!

  • 1- The fluids/blood found on the Renault are 100% SURE/NO DOUBT Maddie's.

    2- The blood found on the Ocean club apartment is 100% SURE/NO DOUBT Maddie's

    is the above true? & how do you know?

    then why no arrests?

  • Yeah pick up the phone and ask British Government to stop interfering into this criminal matter, phone Mr Mitchell and ask him just to shut up as everyone is tired listening to him, please phone British Social Services demanding them to condemn McCanns conduct as an example of negligent parenting, phone Sky News and British newspapers demanding a fair coverage of the story and finally give a call to McCanns and tell them to confess!

  • No matter how you look at the McCanns, they are guilty of leaving their children unattended. It revolts me fact that they try to find excuses: "But nobody would expect a kidnapper to snatcher her". They are "doctors", for God sake! They shouldn't fear kidnappers but ACCIDENTS! That's problem what happened!

  • Thank you!

  • transl. 1:

    translation 1A:

    Hostess: The people I've been talking to (...) bring up mainly that question: if this was a Portuguese couple — and there were so many such cases — people who in fact go out to work and not to have dinner with friends, that go out to go to work and leave three children alone —

  • translation 1B:

    ...one of them by some misfortune drinks some liquid, starts a fire — the other two children are immediately taken away from them and the parents are immediately designated... So... That's the big doubt: Why didn't the same thing happen that would have happened if it was me or you, Paulo...

  • translation 2:

    Paulo Cristóvão: You'll have to ask about that indeed, you'll have to ask about that. And perhaps that's why I say: perhaps the story, the story of this story, will have to be written one day, and well written, and all those details will have to be dissected and we may perhaps have a few surprises. Because I keep saying this, it's something I underline a lot: one thing is the policemen, the persons is on the field, another thing are the political decisions...

  • translation 3:

    H: But was there some kind of favouritism here?

    PC: I don't know if there was favouritism. There was something like a global and instantaneous global solidarity campaign towards the couple, that independently of having been or not victims of a crime through the kidnapping of their daughter, objectively what they were telling the police is a crime. And for much, much less than that many people in Portugal are designated arguidos — I seem to be talking [like the?] defence. ...

  • translation 4:

    ... And I think that since from the beginning they attributed themselves that statute — because it didn't preclude the other part, which was the search for little Madeleine McCann, one thing has nothing to do with the other. Now, objectively, right there, they were confessing to the police having committed a criminally relevant offence as regards our penal code in Portugal.

  • "Now, objectively, right there, they were confessing to the police having committed a criminally relevant offence as regards our penal code in Portugal."

    Did he mean negligence / bad parenting?

  • he's talking about neglect (2):

    3 - If the fact results in:

    a) Serious offense to the physical integrity, the agent is punished with a prison term of 2 to 8 years;

    b) Death, the agent is punished with a prison term of 3 to 10 years.

  • talking about neglect (1-B):

    b) By abandoning her in a defenseless state, for motive of age, physical defect or illness, when the agent had the duty to guard, watch or assist to the person;

    is punished with a prison term of 1 to 5 years.

    2 - If the fact is practised by an ascendant or descendant, adoptant or adoptee of the victim, the agent is punished with a prison term of 2 to 5 years.

  • talking about neglect (1-A).

    Article 138

    Exposure or Abandonment

    1 - Whom endangers the life of another person:

    a) By exposing her in a place where the person is subject to a situation which she cannot defend herself from on her own; or

  • Is it possible to have an English translation of what they are talking here about, please?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more