From what I remember, the referees look at the intent of the cut first (footwork, 1 inch forward followed by strike, etc.), then immediately the cut (was it not accidental and ki ken tai), then zanshin. Even if zanshin was not perfect, MIyazaki Sensei ducked the men blow, he ducked after performing a good tsiki and zanshin itself is hard to spot in a situation like this, his footwork during the thrust was great! That would be all I know about referring and most likely it could be wrong...
no disrespect to any one when i say this, but this is kinda boring. im expecting alittle more acrobatics on there part to spice things up abit instead of using an art style 1000 years ago use the unorthodox and kick some ass. but in a really samurai fight will these fighting styles really matter? but then again i guess its because i dont really know Kendo so again if i offended any Kendo aficionados im sorry.
@MrJoekickass123 A samurai Learned a Kenjutsu...Kendo is what is used for sparring. Back then, they used some lethal stuff. Kendo is more intense when your the person down there. From the sidelines, its going to seem boring....but the people who fight have to read their opponent...they have to be aware of everyting going on in order to win the match. There is alot to kendo....Id say find a local kendo dojo and go watchtake afew classes. After that you will see the intensity.
the tsuki is good but it was not a good timing to atack it because the oponent atack and how we know the atack with the whole body is stronger than the atack with one hand.
Jodan senshu didn't make any valid attacks that is similar to ippon. But Miyazaki is trying more attacks than his opponents..
Miyazaki tried one or two tsuki (which was sloppy indeed) but since Miyazaki is more active than his opponent, so I think judges gave him the point...
@rclarked they didn't give that kote because it was hit with the side of the shinai, not the "blade" part... in other words, it was a sideways strike, not a frontal strike, to kote...
@MrFass That may be .It seems that if you intend to tsuki a person that you should have your head up . No disrespect to the shinpan but where is the allowable sloppiness line?
From what I remember, the referees look at the intent of the cut first (footwork, 1 inch forward followed by strike, etc.), then immediately the cut (was it not accidental and ki ken tai), then zanshin. Even if zanshin was not perfect, MIyazaki Sensei ducked the men blow, he ducked after performing a good tsiki and zanshin itself is hard to spot in a situation like this, his footwork during the thrust was great! That would be all I know about referring and most likely it could be wrong...
Tomofob221 7 months ago
やっぱ審判ヘボだったね・・・残心ないのに一本あげるなんて・・・
shungen2007 8 months ago
あの宮崎選手にの突きは不十分だろ！ 残心は無いし・・・。
審判ヘボ！
kita1919 1 year ago
the someone is called mori
youhajda 1 year ago
no disrespect to any one when i say this, but this is kinda boring. im expecting alittle more acrobatics on there part to spice things up abit instead of using an art style 1000 years ago use the unorthodox and kick some ass. but in a really samurai fight will these fighting styles really matter? but then again i guess its because i dont really know Kendo so again if i offended any Kendo aficionados im sorry.
MrJoekickass123 1 year ago
@MrJoekickass123 A samurai Learned a Kenjutsu...Kendo is what is used for sparring. Back then, they used some lethal stuff. Kendo is more intense when your the person down there. From the sidelines, its going to seem boring....but the people who fight have to read their opponent...they have to be aware of everyting going on in order to win the match. There is alot to kendo....Id say find a local kendo dojo and go watchtake afew classes. After that you will see the intensity.
KagaKiyomitsu 1 year ago
@MrJoekickass123 Sounds reasonable because the great Miyamoto Musashi spoke against the illusion of form (orthodox fighting styles)
TheSekou23 8 months ago
That tsuki is okay,in taikai you will get point for this kind of tsuki
hoozentroger 1 year ago
mune ari?
msalazarx 1 year ago 2
@msalazarx Yeah back in the day Mune tsuki was a valid point. Now it's not
Koyama956 1 year ago
@Koyama956 against Jodan stance, apparently, it still is.
Lamefoureyes 1 year ago
You can change jodan to Mori now.
rakuchina 1 year ago
Good tsuki
puszekPL 2 years ago
the tsuki is good but it was not a good timing to atack it because the oponent atack and how we know the atack with the whole body is stronger than the atack with one hand.
RAlonsoo 2 years ago
I think Judges gave Miyazaki point because
Jodan senshu didn't make any valid attacks that is similar to ippon. But Miyazaki is trying more attacks than his opponents..
Miyazaki tried one or two tsuki (which was sloppy indeed) but since Miyazaki is more active than his opponent, so I think judges gave him the point...
minsub2 2 years ago
it was not a good tsuky
moretzkenzo 2 years ago
I would have counted the kote @ 2:27 but not the tsuki
rclarked 2 years ago
The tsuki was kind of sloppy wasn't it....
ILOVESPEED25 2 years ago
@rclarked they didn't give that kote because it was hit with the side of the shinai, not the "blade" part... in other words, it was a sideways strike, not a frontal strike, to kote...
MrFass 1 year ago
@MrFass That may be .It seems that if you intend to tsuki a person that you should have your head up . No disrespect to the shinpan but where is the allowable sloppiness line?
rclarked 8 months ago
I'm a huge Miyazaki sensei fan . Having said that, In my opinion that tsuki was iffy. There was no zanshin after the strike and his head was down.
rclarked 2 years ago 7
When and who's the guy playin Jodan?
jamjax 2 years ago
Kote on #t=2m27s is so fast. I wish i could do that
Dezzasheep 3 years ago
The jodan-guys name name looks like MORI (森).
kenshi247net 3 years ago