Someone was working on injecting water into the on every other cycle of a conventional 4 cycle design in an effort to use heat to convert to steam. It was supposed to half the hydrocarbon fuel consumption and convert the latent heat into something useful... Somehow the design "went away"
@InteriorCommando Things always "go away" when they proof to save too much gas. Have you ever heard of the German Elsbett engine? Same thing happened to it, it just disappeared....
Heat rejection problems can be countered by simply introducing ordinary water steam into the intake manifold. This is a proven method of removing sufficient heat because water has enormous heat capacity and can make, if properly installed, any engine run more efficiently, because it will consume heat and in turn it will expand, thus doing useful work. This will also remove significant part of heat from cooling system. Friction is the least of problems - check technical data of MYT online.
I have developed this engine more 3 years ago. Very good execution of my engine, can you, at least will communicate with me what to thank for drawings.
This basic design is very old and it is not "easy to make". Just for consideration: he claimed 150 hp from a coffee can sized motor; the heat rejection will be insane. Some food for thought.
But it will be using less fuel, as efficiency is much higher. It has less friction. I think heat will be manageable, and, for it's low cost, it should be easy enough to give it advanced cooling if needed.
Besides, heat is just another source of power, it's small so if you fit a heat cylinder onto it and an electric generator you basically have a hybrid. Or if it's a lot of heat, steam power :p
To be able to use heat as a source of power you need a device to convert heat into work. Then you need to overcome the loss of mass by the small engine to create enough torque. However, for smaller applications that do not require torque, this is a very cool design.
I think the possible future is: rotary engines - like this one - connected to a generator and, accumulators and at the end: in-wheel electric motors. Seems to be nice.
Less parts mean less friction. Compare this engine to a car engine with pistons, connecting rod, crank shaft, cam, timing belt,,,yeah this has a lot less parts to create friction and it travels in one direction so you don't have the kinetic losses either. I'd love to build some sort of a heat engine out of the design.
LoL cliche retarded youtube posts. This looks very cool. I am trying to figure out where all the elements for combustion is ported in. From the looks of it, the engine diesels.
How could you possibly come to such a conclusion? Do you have engineering details of how the parts are made or fit together?
Have you built one? Has it been tested?
I can answer YES to all and though the engine is not totally friction free (nothing is), when compared to a standard 4 cly try and turn the engine(with plugs removed)with a torque wrench see how many ft lbs it takes to turn it?
The engine you see here is equivalent to 110HP when I checked with a torque wrench it was In lbs!
@BigMacdaddyAZ Brother....By now you should know that there are some on the internet who write a bunch of boolsheet every time they find something interesting.This is Called Divide and Roll and Misinfo, and give people the felling that mostly other people are Idiots....Dont even bother to answer these kind of haiters....Its not worth the Effort...Thank you for a very interesting Video anyway...:-)
In our city there is a motor museum, that has similar working motor.
It was done early 1950s I remember. They started it with a big lathe, and yes it did run.
The efficiency was really bad, also lot of problems with heat.
It has complicated mechanical structure, and also it is very heavy compared to "normal" piston engine.
jaska444 1 month ago
you could use go cart clutch against something stationary to prevent the wheel from spinning backwards
ClutchCoin 2 months ago
@ClutchCoin , MYT is using the Russian lever locking for each compression to fire stroke..It appears..
JaxxBat 1 month ago
Will this really work just want it to be run by gas thats all im asking *gizz*
DeadHappyFilm 4 months ago
That is a shot video. But it is good for something!
TheRealDealinlife 9 months ago
The problem with using water inside piston engines is quite apparent when you try and compress water.
rynthphox 9 months ago
Who copied whom?
Search: Motor rotativo Taurozzi 8 or Motor Taurozzi 5
MrOifame 11 months ago
Who copied whom?
Search: Motor rotativo Taurozzi 8 or Motor Taurozzi 5
MrOifame 11 months ago
Someone was working on injecting water into the on every other cycle of a conventional 4 cycle design in an effort to use heat to convert to steam. It was supposed to half the hydrocarbon fuel consumption and convert the latent heat into something useful... Somehow the design "went away"
InteriorCommando 1 year ago
@InteriorCommando Things always "go away" when they proof to save too much gas. Have you ever heard of the German Elsbett engine? Same thing happened to it, it just disappeared....
hobbyguy 1 month ago
@hobbyguy , IMO the best way to get these better engines on the market is "low production" not mass production...
JaxxBat 1 month ago
Heat rejection problems can be countered by simply introducing ordinary water steam into the intake manifold. This is a proven method of removing sufficient heat because water has enormous heat capacity and can make, if properly installed, any engine run more efficiently, because it will consume heat and in turn it will expand, thus doing useful work. This will also remove significant part of heat from cooling system. Friction is the least of problems - check technical data of MYT online.
demios99 1 year ago
Bien syr; ce serait un spectacle, en Afrique ;-)))
kleenex3000 2 years ago
good luck with that
danthemanzizzle 2 years ago
this design is over 100 years old look into the mechanical greats that built steam engines and pumps back in the 1900 s
NOBOX7 2 years ago
I have developed this engine more 3 years ago. Very good execution of my engine, can you, at least will communicate with me what to thank for drawings.
rasiyanin 2 years ago
"And today's Instant Lotto number is..."
ianabruce 2 years ago 26
This basic design is very old and it is not "easy to make". Just for consideration: he claimed 150 hp from a coffee can sized motor; the heat rejection will be insane. Some food for thought.
arachnipope 2 years ago 4
But it will be using less fuel, as efficiency is much higher. It has less friction. I think heat will be manageable, and, for it's low cost, it should be easy enough to give it advanced cooling if needed.
Besides, heat is just another source of power, it's small so if you fit a heat cylinder onto it and an electric generator you basically have a hybrid. Or if it's a lot of heat, steam power :p
Zepherian 2 years ago
To be able to use heat as a source of power you need a device to convert heat into work. Then you need to overcome the loss of mass by the small engine to create enough torque. However, for smaller applications that do not require torque, this is a very cool design.
Ambico87 2 years ago
I want to see this run, it looks great, its basically a 8 pulse version of the MYT engine.
What are there no videos of engines like this running on fuel?
stumbo2w 2 years ago
Travelling toward the most effective hybrid cars.
I think the possible future is: rotary engines - like this one - connected to a generator and, accumulators and at the end: in-wheel electric motors. Seems to be nice.
Eteroxee 2 years ago
Less parts mean less friction. Compare this engine to a car engine with pistons, connecting rod, crank shaft, cam, timing belt,,,yeah this has a lot less parts to create friction and it travels in one direction so you don't have the kinetic losses either. I'd love to build some sort of a heat engine out of the design.
moffett8 2 years ago
LoL cliche retarded youtube posts. This looks very cool. I am trying to figure out where all the elements for combustion is ported in. From the looks of it, the engine diesels.
wtfanman60 3 years ago
it doesn't look terribly hard to manufacture. looks like it could be made with a lave easily?
clayton5150 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
there is too much friction !!!!!!!! your engine have to be friction free for it give some result!
sattanhellsing 3 years ago
How could you possibly come to such a conclusion? Do you have engineering details of how the parts are made or fit together?
Have you built one? Has it been tested?
I can answer YES to all and though the engine is not totally friction free (nothing is), when compared to a standard 4 cly try and turn the engine(with plugs removed)with a torque wrench see how many ft lbs it takes to turn it?
The engine you see here is equivalent to 110HP when I checked with a torque wrench it was In lbs!
BigMacdaddyAZ 3 years ago 2
@BigMacdaddyAZ Brother....By now you should know that there are some on the internet who write a bunch of boolsheet every time they find something interesting.This is Called Divide and Roll and Misinfo, and give people the felling that mostly other people are Idiots....Dont even bother to answer these kind of haiters....Its not worth the Effort...Thank you for a very interesting Video anyway...:-)
Ebdan88 1 year ago
@BigMacdaddyAZ
Actually, some things are friction-free.
Look into bose-einstein condensate behavior.
osakanone 11 months ago
@osakanone
not true
aminimaleffort 2 months ago
@BigMacdaddyAZ Hello,do you have a 3d model view of this engine design?most of your videos only show the front?
Elevationary 4 months ago
This kind of engines is harder to manufacture and maintain.
8917060 3 years ago
failurew
sspoke 3 years ago