@Apoic123 Yeah, this isn't really unique. I've seen many vids of other heavies with amazingly short takeoff rolls. The DC-10, MD-11, and 777 can all do takeoff rolls this short in the right conditions. Impressive video none-the-less.
@irvinmanohar to be honest, unless you have that manifest in your hands, you don't know how many people were on board. hope it was full just to prove you wrong.
@slates010 Don't underestimate me dude. I've tremendous knowledge about aviation. Heavies need longer runway to T/O.
BTW, what the difference if it T/O on shorter or longer runway? The only importance is it can get airborne. Any aircraft if it is empty with low fuel level in the tanks take less runway length to T/O.
must have been empty + the 30 knot headwind enabling the aircraft wings to be utilizing their lift at a level that would be akin to the aircraft moving at 30 knots quicker - v cool. Britannia used to fly 767-3's into Corfu (may still do but not seen for while), and that runway is 7700 ish ft and remember v well the captain actively braking and revving the engines prior to roll to get up in the 7,400 ish usuable at full thrust, not advisable due to airport traffic road red lighted behind lol
Vagina and anal probing is the way to go to keep us safe from the terrorists! Drugsmuglers use the ass or vagina. Imagine how much C4 a terrorist can stack up there The terrorist will go undetected on the plane and we will risk a new 9/11. I would not mind being checked in my ass before flying. Only those that have something to hide will avoid the anus/vagina checking.
If you want to fly. Have your ass and vagina checked first! It should be mandatory for everyone
@Lastbreath187 its the fact that it took off so fast usually its about a 35- 40 second takeoff for that plane for a 767 like that it needs to be at atleast 150 m/h to takeoff
Very impressive. 767 ER were the most profitable airplane Boeing ever built- the biggest heartaches they had were the door mechanisms
Takeoff performance for twin engine passenger jets is extra fun because every passenger plane has to be able to complete a takeoff at max weight with one engine out. An A-340 or 747 has 4 engines, you can take off with 3. Ok. fine. On a 767, 777, 737, MD-80, A330, that means complete a takeoff on ONE engine, so when both are working and the load is light- WOW!
Usually you do not allowed to take-off with a lot of thrust when the airplane is low on weight, this will result in very short take-off yes, but will also speed the things up so the take-off and climb will not be stable it may result in over speed during lift-off and high pitch climb-out a lot of things pilots do not like during take-off. You have to have just right amount of thrust for particular take-off for the things to go as smoothly as possible.
i remind you this is a dangerous action! it are to do a limit to the plane for make it to do the taking off when the human are inside because of to low speed are dangerous to do the take of when it are low speed because it is not fast and will not to the travel to the sky and will do like roll and not departure to sky and it make to have break like you know? fucking hard to do the stop before it can roll over for purpose to slam into car and also to not kill anyone!
The video reads Lost in the triangle...........that plane is taking off in Bermuda. The winds are pretty high there between Jan - March. It doesn't snow there, but we have one hell of a windy winter. Trust me that plane was full of passengers. I should know I live there.
Dude, get an education or something. Keep it like that and you'll either be stuck doing fries at McD's or living off your girlfriend's foodstamps for th rest of your life. It's your call.
Oscar847: career welfare recipient. I was right, so you reply back with "fuckin loser". Is that the only derisive term you know or is that because you still believe Barney says you're special and thus everyone around you is nothing and thus a "fuckin loser"? You, pal, are a tool. You are pre-programmed with one purpose: to waste oxygen. "Loser", lol...get a vocabulary, will ya? Ya simpleton.
The Concorde aircraft was retired, so how can he go fly with them, idiot? He can't! And you probably sit on your fat lazy butt 24/7 eating potato chips and trolling on Youtube, because you're socially retarded, and you call SenorSpode a loser? You're the loser since you troll on here 24/7, not him. Just because he has better comebacks than you, doesn't make him a loser. Seriously, with your comments, you're only proving that you're a loser and you're stupid. Think before posting lame crap, idiot
Yes you are right, but when you do a short take off you put flaps 15 and packs off.... because the packs needs the energy of the engines to work.. so they put the packs off to have more energy at the takeoff... its the same in the cars if you put the air conditioner off your car will be more fast
alright... so you think your so smart, what if you are in a 747 taking off from St Maarten, you would use full power OK, its a common procedure in many other places too!
NO you DON'T! There is no arguing with anybody on this one! All jet airliner takeoffs are derated either from performance charts during pre-flight planning, or through a Thrust Mode Select Panel, you don't use full power on a turbine engine takeoff, that's just the dumbest fuckin' thing I've ever heard, in your comment. You don't even use full power on a go-around, it's a set thrust in the TO/GA Mode on any modern jetliner.
Amazing comeback! You're right, I just make all this shit up as I sit in a chair in my room with my finger in my ass, not like I learned any of it in Turbine Systems Ground School during training or anything.
i'm not saying you made it up, i mean i belive you because you obviously know more than me since i'm 14 but you would sound alot more belivable if you wern't a jerk about it.
i agree with you thats pretty much the take off KLM 747 does at st maarten . i've seen a delta 757 took off there after 10 seconds , at 1st it looked like he was going stall
yeah, sometimes if the chart does call for it you have to set full power, most "heavies" do at St Maarten too because you want every bit of altitude there haha :)
Actually jet engines operate at takeoff thrust (below full power) depending on the OAT, so each takeoff produces different takeoff thrust but remains below maximum continous thrust.
Full power takeoff decreases operation life and for a certain duration cause the compressor section to melt and EGT to rise.
However in an engine out takeoff and to meet the climb gradient, obstacles the flightcrew can apply maximum continous thrust on the remaining engine.
Aircraft always take off into a head wind to reduce take off run and ground speed.Taken off in a 30 knt tailwind , would require a longer take off distance and faster ground speed to acheive the required airspeed. Landing and taken off into head wind ?yes. Crusing in a tail wind ?yes.which gives a faster ground speed.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well, you sir are Partually Correct, For The Landing The Aircraft Hits A Head Wind, But We Are Talking About Departure, It Had To Be A Tail Wind, Cuz A Head Wind Will Delay The Deaparture About 20 seconds in 30 Kts, Get What i am Saying?
To hell with description... even though it doesn't mention direction. Look at the trees in the movie, you idiot! Tail winds DO NOT generate lift! Head winds do!
Right on Dude! That 767 must have been really light, look at the flap setting. Watched a 757 do that off Grand Cayman one time, looked like it rolled a couple hundred feet and climbed out at 45deg. Phenomenal.
Partially correct? Dude you are out of your fucking mind and know nothing about flying. All airplanes including hellos take off and land into the prevailing wind, that's why so many airports have runways going in so many different directions. Aircraft carriers always steer into the wind while launching and retreiving aircraft.I hope I didn't hurt your feelings but don't comment on things you know nothing about.
If his rotation speed were 140 knots that day (total guess), after subtracting the 30 knot headwind, you filmed him rotating at a groundspeed of 110, while the indicated airspeed in the cockpit was 140kts. I think that what may have made the most difference was having 30kts of wind blasting into the engines... because what takes the longest time at the start of the roll is waiting for the engines to start getting enough air in them to start making some decent thrust.
And I forgot to say at the start of my post, " In addition to being at a very light weight I also think...."
Also, the rotation speed (and all others) is based on weight, so if this 767 was really light his rotation speed may have been really low also... especially since this was a -200 which is pretty light compared to a -300ER.
You're a coward and a stupid web troll. You find it easy to curse me out from behind the safety and anonymity of your screen, but wouyld you do it to my face? No. You're pitiful. There was no reason for that. You're a great example of how YT brings out the worst in people. Just plain sad.
Very cool video, that was a pretty short takeoff roll. I have been on a full 767 that I was hoping would get in the air before reaching the end of the runway. To see one just lift off the ground like that is pretty cool.
wot dis shit? fak shit dat wot dis shit is fer tru cos dis ocur? nah fuck dat shit n fuck dis fagot o try dis american asshole fagots no dis ocur cos dem fagots no tak off lik lik praise dis no asshole fagots fuck american cunts dey burn in da hellfire assholes fuck u
4th commandment/sabbath trashing is about the most obvious religious con job/deception on EARTH. Just compare how 99% of the church use ACTS 20:7 and never teach about ACTS 13:42-44, 16:13, 17:2 and 18:4. The usual text used is Col 2:16,17 and by many who don't have a clue what they are talking about. If PAUL trashed the sabbath, why didn't he warn all of those gentiles in ACTS to stop hanging around the Jews and come worship with him on the SUNday/Lord's day?
As I recall, the shortest/quickest takeoff I was on was a PSA BAe 146 from SFO runway 1L. He literally got a running start from the gate as it was the closest terminal to 1L. All the frequent PSA flyers were like, "Whoa...that was quick!"
If you look at the waves in the background and listen to the puffing of the mic you can see there was a substantial headwind. Actually the groundspeed and TO distance CAN be a lot less. Only thing that doesn't change is true airspeed. Judging by the that climb angle he was probably light and climbing like Endeavour!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
My bros, and F-22 Raptor piolet and really 747s are nothing compared to the jet he flys, i once went with him on a flight and it was the crazyest thing i have ever been on. We took off from USS Missisippi of the Gulf of Mexico and landed in Texas with a parachute at end. CRAZIEST SHIT OF MY LIFE!!!
omg...thats the most bull I ever seen in 1 paragragh. First of all the F-22 Raptor is a single seat aircraft. Second...family members can't randomly go on aircraft carriers for flights. Third USS Mississippi isnt an aircraft carrier!!! FYI...The last USS Mississippi was a Nuclear Guided Missile Cruiser CGN-40. On 31 July, 1997, USS MISSISSIPPI was officially decommissioned and was later towed to Bremerton, Washington for reactor core removal and storage
Firstly - bullshit. And secondly I hope Air Force pilots enjoy their 150hrs a year they get to throw in their logbook cause in the commercial world we get 800-1000.
onto Trruckker's comment if you even had the smart sense to say USS Enterprize or The Nimitz you would of still been burned...the F-22 doesn't do carrier ops...way to make an ass of yourself
Yeah, that's some nice headwind. Listen to the popping sound on the camcorder's microphone. From this sailor's perspective, that does sound (and LOOK- on the water in the background) like a Force 5 or Force 6 wind (fresh breeze). Add that 30 knots wind to the overground speed and there you go.
Maybe he have afterburns ;D
MakarowskiVideo 2 weeks ago
in russia, plane takes off in -16 seconds!
EmpireofBritain96 1 month ago
thumbs up if you love this plane!
pipidores 4 months ago
Awesome BIRD with great crew and efficient pilots, gives the word " FRIENDLY SKIES" its true meaning...I LOVE to fly American Airlines!!! <3
marizb 4 months ago
Great.Never seen before.
clsegull 4 months ago
The turtle was the best part
OriginalGatorHater1 5 months ago
I've never seen THAT before - ever!
dwbush777 6 months ago
very short
zaher19771 6 months ago
high headwinds = short takeoff distance. You can see the dust blowing accross the tarmac.
poindexterdick 6 months ago
@poindexterdick thats what I was thinking too....
jackwhite910 2 months ago
iba vacio o que?
fl4v100xx 6 months ago
u guys should see what a 777 can do, i had similar experience. the aircraft was empty.
Apoic123 7 months ago
@Apoic123 Yeah, this isn't really unique. I've seen many vids of other heavies with amazingly short takeoff rolls. The DC-10, MD-11, and 777 can all do takeoff rolls this short in the right conditions. Impressive video none-the-less.
Neno8403 6 months ago
@Apoic123 yeah... the a/c was empty.. these ignorant fools don't know about it..
irvinmanohar 5 months ago
Comment removed
slates010 5 months ago
@irvinmanohar to be honest, unless you have that manifest in your hands, you don't know how many people were on board. hope it was full just to prove you wrong.
slates010 5 months ago
@slates010 Don't underestimate me dude. I've tremendous knowledge about aviation. Heavies need longer runway to T/O.
BTW, what the difference if it T/O on shorter or longer runway? The only importance is it can get airborne. Any aircraft if it is empty with low fuel level in the tanks take less runway length to T/O.
irvinmanohar 5 months ago
Pre 9/11 I was in the cockpit jump seat of an AA 757 with no pax at night MIA to HAV it was awesome!
tubulardude44 7 months ago
jesus i thought the plane exploded at the end with that "turtle production" thing
SuperDoucheMonkey 8 months ago 12
@SuperDoucheMonkey Me too lol
omer66gs 7 months ago
This bird was built to fly
SFConifer 8 months ago
Airspeed alive, gear up.
Tjita1 8 months ago
i have travel on a JAL 747-400(@2011 feb)which is ~80% load ,and it T/O in ~30 Sec(Less then)
PlaneKMT 8 months ago
@PlaneKMT and the V1 speed is 131,VR 142 and V2 on 153 XDD
PlaneKMT 8 months ago
must have been empty + the 30 knot headwind enabling the aircraft wings to be utilizing their lift at a level that would be akin to the aircraft moving at 30 knots quicker - v cool. Britannia used to fly 767-3's into Corfu (may still do but not seen for while), and that runway is 7700 ish ft and remember v well the captain actively braking and revving the engines prior to roll to get up in the 7,400 ish usuable at full thrust, not advisable due to airport traffic road red lighted behind lol
EsotericLenfant 8 months ago
empty aircraft thats why ........
hanzel1 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Vagina and anal probing is the way to go to keep us safe from the terrorists! Drugsmuglers use the ass or vagina. Imagine how much C4 a terrorist can stack up there The terrorist will go undetected on the plane and we will risk a new 9/11. I would not mind being checked in my ass before flying. Only those that have something to hide will avoid the anus/vagina checking.
If you want to fly. Have your ass and vagina checked first! It should be mandatory for everyone
RadioIlluminaticom 9 months ago
She had to be near empty!
08687435701 10 months ago
Its a plane taking off ! big deal ! Im not pilot so i don't know your little terms. Whats the big deal someone tell me ?
Lastbreath187 10 months ago
@Lastbreath187 how do i say this in a way you'll understand: plane fly fast off ground
magicnintendo64 10 months ago
@Lastbreath187 its the fact that it took off so fast usually its about a 35- 40 second takeoff for that plane for a 767 like that it needs to be at atleast 150 m/h to takeoff
glenquagmire3456 8 months ago
when did it roll?....stupid video, i can go to the airport and film take offs too !!!
Lastbreath187 11 months ago
@Lastbreath187 brush up on aircraft knowledge before you make a statement like that...
nevagonnadie2 10 months ago
@Lastbreath187 You fail at life
dbldwn02 10 months ago
it runs on diesel oil
maplebanks 11 months ago
Wow, musta had a light load and significant wind.
bg11215 1 year ago
wwwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
emiratesA380NCL 1 year ago
Very impressive. 767 ER were the most profitable airplane Boeing ever built- the biggest heartaches they had were the door mechanisms
Takeoff performance for twin engine passenger jets is extra fun because every passenger plane has to be able to complete a takeoff at max weight with one engine out. An A-340 or 747 has 4 engines, you can take off with 3. Ok. fine. On a 767, 777, 737, MD-80, A330, that means complete a takeoff on ONE engine, so when both are working and the load is light- WOW!
wbaiv 1 year ago
Considering it was American Airlines it was probably a light load. That always helps.
FightFireWithFaith 1 year ago
762's can take off under 2000 metres, shorter takeoff run than a 737!
ThomsonAirwaysFs 1 year ago
How could anyone dislike such a beutiful aircraft?
767deltaairlines 1 year ago 24
@767deltaairlines Boeing haters and Airbuss lovers?
harold562 3 months ago
probably empty..
323tiim 1 year ago
Usually you do not allowed to take-off with a lot of thrust when the airplane is low on weight, this will result in very short take-off yes, but will also speed the things up so the take-off and climb will not be stable it may result in over speed during lift-off and high pitch climb-out a lot of things pilots do not like during take-off. You have to have just right amount of thrust for particular take-off for the things to go as smoothly as possible.
636555530 1 year ago 3
this video could have been recorded in my driveway haaha.What an impressive take off.
5Cork5 1 year ago
omg i wasn't looking at the screen properly and when the thing came up at the end i thought the plane blew up :O nice vid tho
KeMpYKiiD 1 year ago
the 767 is one of boeings fastest, reaching 100 mph in 6s, i remember reading that in the Boeing website (i could b wrong)
0611930024838 1 year ago
The title is a little misleading.
As in roll I thought it was in refference to rolling.
Not as in a video roll as in film. lol Good indecation though
BeautifullPandora 1 year ago
too bad AA doesnt do this flight anymore. I once flew this flight in 1st class
N700UW 1 year ago
it's coz of the strong headwind @ :43 or even lighter weight giving faster time to V1 then rotation
spyromatt 1 year ago
concerteza esse voo tava vazio apenas o peso do combustiveu
P15M12 1 year ago
dang pretty quick
Drake4677 1 year ago
i remind you this is a dangerous action! it are to do a limit to the plane for make it to do the taking off when the human are inside because of to low speed are dangerous to do the take of when it are low speed because it is not fast and will not to the travel to the sky and will do like roll and not departure to sky and it make to have break like you know? fucking hard to do the stop before it can roll over for purpose to slam into car and also to not kill anyone!
Greet from egypt
AbudAisham 1 year ago
@AbudAisham it maybe without passengers or something...
rayyancooldude98 1 year ago
@AbudAisham jesus, its hard to make any sense out of that speach....lol
unmik2006 1 year ago
@AbudAisham what the fuck are you saying......makes no sence at all..
unmik2006 1 year ago
@unmik2006 true.but your english is wrong too...
TheJayBluE 1 year ago
@AbudAisham Well put.
jesknow 1 year ago
Lol?
LordIllidan98 1 year ago
I saw an empty Hawaiian 767 take off in 8 seconds.
TravisaKaBiggie 1 year ago
@TravisaKaBiggie where..????
rayyancooldude98 1 year ago
Its A 767 not a" crashbus" its probably not loaded or fully fueled
198012344321 1 year ago
i bet the pilot was behind schedule or something
105Raptor 1 year ago
boeing 737? maybe 777? cant really tell.
Al3xan6er 1 year ago
@Al3xan6er it's a 767
sabadashi 1 year ago
The video reads Lost in the triangle...........that plane is taking off in Bermuda. The winds are pretty high there between Jan - March. It doesn't snow there, but we have one hell of a windy winter. Trust me that plane was full of passengers. I should know I live there.
mytbull5 1 year ago
man o man how i wish i will one day fly for a major airline!
LaZyLuKe25 1 year ago
im bettin that guy was empty, if he would have done that with passengers aboard they would have all shit their pants in unison.
wrenchhed29 1 year ago
sweet
nwa333 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
load of shit
doodlebond 1 year ago
This is 100% real, why are you calling it a load of crap (Don't get mad at me since I said crap instead of the other word)?
Pober135 1 year ago 3
Very impressive! 767´s are great...even the smaller -200 series.
MuCerq 1 year ago 45
@MuCerq I prefer the 300ER
767deltaairlines 1 year ago
767 sux
Oscar847 2 years ago
Friends don't let friends fly Airbus. Or should that be "Airsub", after those 3 water incidents of 2009?
Remember, kiddos: "If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going!"
SenorSpode 2 years ago
@SenorSpode
go fly with Concorde :)
Oscar847 2 years ago
Oscar: please return to the place of your birth. And take plenty of K-Y with you. And a hydraulic ram. Have a nice day. :-)
SenorSpode 2 years ago
@SenorSpode
what..?
dude go get laid or summin
Oscar847 2 years ago
Dude, get an education or something. Keep it like that and you'll either be stuck doing fries at McD's or living off your girlfriend's foodstamps for th rest of your life. It's your call.
Get eager, will you?
SenorSpode 2 years ago
@SenorSpode
fuckin loser
Oscar847 2 years ago
Oscar847: career welfare recipient. I was right, so you reply back with "fuckin loser". Is that the only derisive term you know or is that because you still believe Barney says you're special and thus everyone around you is nothing and thus a "fuckin loser"? You, pal, are a tool. You are pre-programmed with one purpose: to waste oxygen. "Loser", lol...get a vocabulary, will ya? Ya simpleton.
SenorSpode 2 years ago
@SenorSpode
fucking hell man
get off my back, ur no any use
Oscar847 2 years ago
The Concorde aircraft was retired, so how can he go fly with them, idiot? He can't! And you probably sit on your fat lazy butt 24/7 eating potato chips and trolling on Youtube, because you're socially retarded, and you call SenorSpode a loser? You're the loser since you troll on here 24/7, not him. Just because he has better comebacks than you, doesn't make him a loser. Seriously, with your comments, you're only proving that you're a loser and you're stupid. Think before posting lame crap, idiot
Pober135 1 year ago
@Oscar847 Your spelling "sux"
texashorns76 2 years ago 2
@texashorns76
texas hold 'em
Oscar847 2 years ago
@Oscar847 Was that supposed to be funny?
texashorns76 2 years ago
Comment removed
abba01 2 years ago
Comment removed
abba01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thia was lame
rigostar14 2 years ago
maybe a very cold weather..
scofield92200 2 years ago
yeh now thats wota a strong head wind does for you.
ratodoesgato 2 years ago
agreeeeee!
hkgyyzhkg 2 years ago
two facts:
-it is taking off at the sea level, which makes the air more dense, that way hotter soy it rises
-and... probably there was a significant headwind...
eamt10 2 years ago
wow 2 secs different?
austingagnard 2 years ago
18 SEC no 16
Metaliclp 2 years ago
Headwind + Flaps 15 + full power +rolling takeoff + light load = short takeoff run :)
genysys20 2 years ago 98
and packs off :)
jandres07 2 years ago
Don't the packs get put back on after the engines have been started? Excuse my ignorance I dont know a huge amount about how the packs work :)
jlebesis 2 years ago
Yes you are right, but when you do a short take off you put flaps 15 and packs off.... because the packs needs the energy of the engines to work.. so they put the packs off to have more energy at the takeoff... its the same in the cars if you put the air conditioner off your car will be more fast
jandres07 2 years ago
what r "packs" ?
wilatemodel 2 years ago
Air conditioning packs, they use up engine power.
patsmithj 2 years ago
you forget about barometric pressure,
haykodjan 2 years ago
plus, humidity and density altitude.
n673ma 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Airliners don't use full power on takeoff, retard. EVER.
coutchou 2 years ago
alright... so you think your so smart, what if you are in a 747 taking off from St Maarten, you would use full power OK, its a common procedure in many other places too!
genysys20 2 years ago 2
NO you DON'T! There is no arguing with anybody on this one! All jet airliner takeoffs are derated either from performance charts during pre-flight planning, or through a Thrust Mode Select Panel, you don't use full power on a turbine engine takeoff, that's just the dumbest fuckin' thing I've ever heard, in your comment. You don't even use full power on a go-around, it's a set thrust in the TO/GA Mode on any modern jetliner.
coutchou 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If thats the dombest fucking thing you've ever heard you certainly don't leave your house very often!
genysys20 2 years ago
Amazing comeback! You're right, I just make all this shit up as I sit in a chair in my room with my finger in my ass, not like I learned any of it in Turbine Systems Ground School during training or anything.
coutchou 2 years ago
i'm not saying you made it up, i mean i belive you because you obviously know more than me since i'm 14 but you would sound alot more belivable if you wern't a jerk about it.
genysys20 2 years ago
i agree with you thats pretty much the take off KLM 747 does at st maarten . i've seen a delta 757 took off there after 10 seconds , at 1st it looked like he was going stall
Damienm7 2 years ago
yeah, sometimes if the chart does call for it you have to set full power, most "heavies" do at St Maarten too because you want every bit of altitude there haha :)
genysys20 2 years ago
@genysys20 +low temp
Rwy02 1 year ago
@genysys20 that's a flap 5 mate... not 15
carloraggio 1 year ago
@carloraggio no, look at 0:23 the flaps are clearly set to 15 degrees
genysys20 1 year ago
@genysys20 buddy i fly a real 767... that's a -200 on a short flight with headwind... that was a flap 5 takeoff.
carloraggio 1 year ago
Actually jet engines operate at takeoff thrust (below full power) depending on the OAT, so each takeoff produces different takeoff thrust but remains below maximum continous thrust.
Full power takeoff decreases operation life and for a certain duration cause the compressor section to melt and EGT to rise.
However in an engine out takeoff and to meet the climb gradient, obstacles the flightcrew can apply maximum continous thrust on the remaining engine.
EinkOLED 11 months ago
@genysys20 yeh whatever GEEK. go play on your flight sim.
plasticspastic201 8 months ago
I imagine that if the wind had suddenly quit,
he would have busted his rectal area.
PistolPete2 2 years ago
Aircraft always take off into a head wind to reduce take off run and ground speed.Taken off in a 30 knt tailwind , would require a longer take off distance and faster ground speed to acheive the required airspeed. Landing and taken off into head wind ?yes. Crusing in a tail wind ?yes.which gives a faster ground speed.
MRNEILRYAN 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ATTENTION ALL USERS THIS IS THE REAL DYL962, MY ACCOUNT WAS BEING HACKED BY SOMEONE ON SKYPE, ABOUT THE LANDING, Exnech2/Klesmer, You Are Correct
dyl962 2 years ago
Well, The Reason Why The 767-200ER Departed In 16 Sec, Is Simply B/c Of The 30 Knot Tail Wind Upon Departure, Read The Discription.
dyl962 2 years ago
wouldnt it be a 30 KT headwind, since aircraft take off and land into the wind?
raph4485 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, you sir are Partually Correct, For The Landing The Aircraft Hits A Head Wind, But We Are Talking About Departure, It Had To Be A Tail Wind, Cuz A Head Wind Will Delay The Deaparture About 20 seconds in 30 Kts, Get What i am Saying?
dyl962 2 years ago
To hell with description... even though it doesn't mention direction. Look at the trees in the movie, you idiot! Tail winds DO NOT generate lift! Head winds do!
Lrn2Physics
Exmech2 2 years ago
Right on Dude! That 767 must have been really light, look at the flap setting. Watched a 757 do that off Grand Cayman one time, looked like it rolled a couple hundred feet and climbed out at 45deg. Phenomenal.
klesmer 2 years ago
Partially correct? Dude you are out of your fucking mind and know nothing about flying. All airplanes including hellos take off and land into the prevailing wind, that's why so many airports have runways going in so many different directions. Aircraft carriers always steer into the wind while launching and retreiving aircraft.I hope I didn't hurt your feelings but don't comment on things you know nothing about.
klesmer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you're compleatlly wrong!!! YOu not know much about aerodynamics and aviation at all. this is one of the principals in that!
kaporwojtas 2 years ago
tailwind?tht would add 30 knots to the vr. it would take a LOT longer
bobnoxadrez 2 years ago
30kt tailwind and he would have departed the runway at the other end ;)
maskedhedgehog 2 years ago
Prob a repo flight. No pax or cargo, just the flight crew. Climbrate like a rocket, I bet.
Buibuilo 2 years ago
There's video of a 757 taking off from KSAN's runway 27, and rotated roughly within 1500ft.
musico81986 2 years ago
man he wasn't mesin around
TimeMan31 2 years ago
at 1:14 te plane looked like it expolded
rvdfan001 2 years ago 3
lol 5*
Chrisso1994 2 years ago
just less fuel i imagine
Jagermeister196 2 years ago
If his rotation speed were 140 knots that day (total guess), after subtracting the 30 knot headwind, you filmed him rotating at a groundspeed of 110, while the indicated airspeed in the cockpit was 140kts. I think that what may have made the most difference was having 30kts of wind blasting into the engines... because what takes the longest time at the start of the roll is waiting for the engines to start getting enough air in them to start making some decent thrust.
StratMatt777 2 years ago 2
Great explanation !
Zerocool003 2 years ago 2
Thanks Zerocool!
And I forgot to say at the start of my post, " In addition to being at a very light weight I also think...."
Also, the rotation speed (and all others) is based on weight, so if this 767 was really light his rotation speed may have been really low also... especially since this was a -200 which is pretty light compared to a -300ER.
StratMatt777 2 years ago
+1 :)
Zerocool003 2 years ago
Also b/c he was already rolling when he hit the throttles?
rafalweb 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THEY USUALLY ARE FUCKNOSE!
Airbus294 2 years ago
You're a coward and a stupid web troll. You find it easy to curse me out from behind the safety and anonymity of your screen, but wouyld you do it to my face? No. You're pitiful. There was no reason for that. You're a great example of how YT brings out the worst in people. Just plain sad.
rafalweb 2 years ago 6
do you need waffles ... they make people smile
fredvonnothing 2 years ago
No thanks, I smile all the time......
rpwVideoInstruction 2 years ago
The wind helped but was a remarkable shord take off 4 a 767, like a twin otter take off roll, lol.
muz06 2 years ago
Are airliners prohibited from taking off when head winds are TOO strong -- like 50 kts?
hackamore 2 years ago
Doubt it, unless it's variable or crosswind.
iceman977th 2 years ago
he took of into high winds , that why the roll was short
toufikw 2 years ago
Very cool video, that was a pretty short takeoff roll. I have been on a full 767 that I was hoping would get in the air before reaching the end of the runway. To see one just lift off the ground like that is pretty cool.
HorsesAndPlanes 2 years ago
damnn!!!!!
porkypker27 2 years ago
strong wings + Empty plane = short takeoff's :)
i seen many of these down my local airport =)
good vid
BIASpotter 2 years ago 3
yea that is short but it would be as it already has an airspeed of 30 konts before the groundspeed is above 0
pkay098 2 years ago
because of the wind, cuz i live in Nice and when there is lot of wind , takes off are very short
yoyo06200Nice 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wot dis shit? fak shit dat wot dis shit is fer tru cos dis ocur? nah fuck dat shit n fuck dis fagot o try dis american asshole fagots no dis ocur cos dem fagots no tak off lik lik praise dis no asshole fagots fuck american cunts dey burn in da hellfire assholes fuck u
faroolabjalmak 2 years ago
faroolabjalmak
We're so proud of your grasp on the English language...and fuck you dude...fuck Pakistan fuck you....USA up your ass
shadddey5 2 years ago 6
wow
abeid9 2 years ago 5
damn
silverboots000 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
4th commandment/sabbath trashing is about the most obvious religious con job/deception on EARTH. Just compare how 99% of the church use ACTS 20:7 and never teach about ACTS 13:42-44, 16:13, 17:2 and 18:4. The usual text used is Col 2:16,17 and by many who don't have a clue what they are talking about. If PAUL trashed the sabbath, why didn't he warn all of those gentiles in ACTS to stop hanging around the Jews and come worship with him on the SUNday/Lord's day?
gideonjrn 2 years ago
As I recall, the shortest/quickest takeoff I was on was a PSA BAe 146 from SFO runway 1L. He literally got a running start from the gate as it was the closest terminal to 1L. All the frequent PSA flyers were like, "Whoa...that was quick!"
Loved PSA and the 146's.
sphmusak 2 years ago 2
If you look at the waves in the background and listen to the puffing of the mic you can see there was a substantial headwind. Actually the groundspeed and TO distance CAN be a lot less. Only thing that doesn't change is true airspeed. Judging by the that climb angle he was probably light and climbing like Endeavour!
cardinaldriver 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My bros, and F-22 Raptor piolet and really 747s are nothing compared to the jet he flys, i once went with him on a flight and it was the crazyest thing i have ever been on. We took off from USS Missisippi of the Gulf of Mexico and landed in Texas with a parachute at end. CRAZIEST SHIT OF MY LIFE!!!
danmcdonalds 2 years ago
omg...thats the most bull I ever seen in 1 paragragh. First of all the F-22 Raptor is a single seat aircraft. Second...family members can't randomly go on aircraft carriers for flights. Third USS Mississippi isnt an aircraft carrier!!! FYI...The last USS Mississippi was a Nuclear Guided Missile Cruiser CGN-40. On 31 July, 1997, USS MISSISSIPPI was officially decommissioned and was later towed to Bremerton, Washington for reactor core removal and storage
Trruckker 2 years ago 5
Yes, Danmcdonalds is full of it, and your response is thorough, but Dan is barely a teenager, I'm guessing just a kid with a good imagination!
aryamehr4 2 years ago
Firstly - bullshit. And secondly I hope Air Force pilots enjoy their 150hrs a year they get to throw in their logbook cause in the commercial world we get 800-1000.
gnarkillkicksass 2 years ago
onto Trruckker's comment if you even had the smart sense to say USS Enterprize or The Nimitz you would of still been burned...the F-22 doesn't do carrier ops...way to make an ass of yourself
shadddey5 2 years ago
Closest I've seen to that was a fully loaded 757 liftoff in 15 seconds flat.
noonedude101 2 years ago
must have been flying around without freight and only few pax that day..
dnhug 2 years ago
thats one hell of a tailwind
Spayne007 2 years ago
headwind double oh seven, headwind.
kewlmynd99 2 years ago 2
lol thats what i meant idk why i said tailwind
Spayne007 2 years ago
Yup!
lostinthetriangle 2 years ago
Was one "hell of a headwind!"
lostinthetriangle 2 years ago
Ive never seen a takeoff THAT short
aselyatheslayer 2 years ago
Holy crab. Was that even a km? 767-200s can take off MTOW in less than 2km, but this is freaking short!
MingGuoLi 2 years ago
where is bda?
gobuzzrobotics 2 years ago
Bermuda
lostinthetriangle 2 years ago
Yeah, that's some nice headwind. Listen to the popping sound on the camcorder's microphone. From this sailor's perspective, that does sound (and LOOK- on the water in the background) like a Force 5 or Force 6 wind (fresh breeze). Add that 30 knots wind to the overground speed and there you go.
Gball223 2 years ago
thats simply amazing
v12kid 2 years ago
wooooow that´s incredible
airberlin160 2 years ago
very low weight, no psgrs!!
ptrss 2 years ago