Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
I can't elieve that in the DNA age, evolutionists are still using Lamarckian stories, using computers with algorithms intelligently designed makes everything possible, but in no way this represents the real genetic situation.
He never does, and never will, explain what is making the decisions in his evolutionary process. He says it is not random chance, then he says it is, then he lectures us for 10 minutes on the definition of 'trial and error' as if we didn't know that already! Of course he doesn't even mention 'trial and error', supposing that we might think he invented it! Hahaha......
megabraddotcom: I'm no scholar, but I think the decision making mechanism of evolution you are referring to would be the differential survival of members of a species (being organisms that can interbreed). Differential survival would be linked to predator/prey interactions, environment, is there food / disease etc...- basically all the stuff that determines if an organism will survive to reproduction age.
The environment kills the worst adapted, predators killing easy prey or other animals eating the limited food first.
Then what you have left is something a little better adapted to survive, which then go on to have children with slight mutations and the process repeats.
I've written my own simulation here in which I explain the process and demonstrate it:
If im not mistaken, Down syndrome does indeed add more information, but none of it is new information, just an "extra copy of the 21 chromosome" according to wikipedia.
2. Where would such information come from? In the example given in this video there are only variations on pre-existing characteristics. No new characteristics are created. That would require changes to his bio-morph program. In the real world that would require a new family/kind. The example given allows for changes within a species, but not the development of new species...
@joshualcoombe Believing in microevolution as you do but not macroevolution which is the essence of new species development that you are skeptical of is like believing you can walk across the room but not across a park. It is a question of time, and 4 billion years is a lot. If you could see the entire continuum of evolution of species across time, theoretically, you would see gradual slides from one species into another. The extinction of linking species creates the illusion of divers animals.
@MST3KLives I don't think species can evolve new genetic material but become diverse based on pre-existing genetic traits. Example: A mongrel dog can have offspring with any of the traits of its close ancestors, but a pure breed dog is limited in the traits that it has and that it passes down to future generations.
That means that new species can come about by mixing previously unmixed traits within a family, but those traits are limited within a family.
@joshualcoombe I do not have the space to list the voluminous amounts of evidence that show that evolution can indeed produce new genetic information into a species. Please research online at websites other than creationist ones to clear up your misconceptions.
He looks really handsome in his younger years.
TheLegendOZelda360 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 months ago
I can't elieve that in the DNA age, evolutionists are still using Lamarckian stories, using computers with algorithms intelligently designed makes everything possible, but in no way this represents the real genetic situation.
IloveYOUviruses 10 months ago
why is the volume so low
doneverest88 1 year ago
ohh he's so young there. And so's his computer!
greengrendel 1 year ago
He never does, and never will, explain what is making the decisions in his evolutionary process. He says it is not random chance, then he says it is, then he lectures us for 10 minutes on the definition of 'trial and error' as if we didn't know that already! Of course he doesn't even mention 'trial and error', supposing that we might think he invented it! Hahaha......
megabraddotcom 2 years ago
megabraddotcom: I'm no scholar, but I think the decision making mechanism of evolution you are referring to would be the differential survival of members of a species (being organisms that can interbreed). Differential survival would be linked to predator/prey interactions, environment, is there food / disease etc...- basically all the stuff that determines if an organism will survive to reproduction age.
tehsma 2 years ago 3
Natural Selection.
AnonymousCthulhu 2 years ago
It's random mutation.
The environment kills the worst adapted, predators killing easy prey or other animals eating the limited food first.
Then what you have left is something a little better adapted to survive, which then go on to have children with slight mutations and the process repeats.
I've written my own simulation here in which I explain the process and demonstrate it:
watch?v=QCQoyJAiMoo
TheRationalizer 2 years ago
If im not mistaken, Down syndrome does indeed add more information, but none of it is new information, just an "extra copy of the 21 chromosome" according to wikipedia.
hitmaker 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
mutations do not add information therefore, animals can only change within the available genes,
a01011399 3 years ago
1. Define information
2. Why is it imposible for new information to be added
3. Why can't the invisible genes change as well
doogtoog 3 years ago
@doogtoog
1. Genetic sequences - strands of DNA
2. Where would such information come from? In the example given in this video there are only variations on pre-existing characteristics. No new characteristics are created. That would require changes to his bio-morph program. In the real world that would require a new family/kind. The example given allows for changes within a species, but not the development of new species...
joshualcoombe 1 year ago
@joshualcoombe Believing in microevolution as you do but not macroevolution which is the essence of new species development that you are skeptical of is like believing you can walk across the room but not across a park. It is a question of time, and 4 billion years is a lot. If you could see the entire continuum of evolution of species across time, theoretically, you would see gradual slides from one species into another. The extinction of linking species creates the illusion of divers animals.
MST3KLives 1 year ago
@MST3KLives I don't think species can evolve new genetic material but become diverse based on pre-existing genetic traits. Example: A mongrel dog can have offspring with any of the traits of its close ancestors, but a pure breed dog is limited in the traits that it has and that it passes down to future generations.
That means that new species can come about by mixing previously unmixed traits within a family, but those traits are limited within a family.
joshualcoombe 1 year ago
@joshualcoombe I do not have the space to list the voluminous amounts of evidence that show that evolution can indeed produce new genetic information into a species. Please research online at websites other than creationist ones to clear up your misconceptions.
MST3KLives 1 year ago
@MST3KLives I have the space to dispute the list of voluminous amounts of evidence that show that evolution can produce new genetic information.
Done!
youtube /watch?v=zaKryi3605g
joshualcoombe 1 year ago
mutations add information all the time, where did you get your information?
agenttachyon 3 years ago
they do?
hitmaker 3 years ago
Yes, check out Down's Syndrome for example.
agenttachyon 3 years ago
great set of videos
thanx for posting bro!
shiftyglass 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Me 1st.....excellent
raksta76 3 years ago