OKay guys, seriously, If you are anti-Catholic, why do you even bother watching Catholic videos. If you are confused about Catholic doctrine, why are you being so dissmissive instead of receptive. kiwichristian2009 is now block for being rude, and and insulting our religion. If you aren't Catholic but love Mary the mother of the Saviour, then welcome, If you have questions about Catholicism by all means ask. If you seek to enrage, or post nasty, dissmisive comments do not or I will block you.
Writers on the Canon Law say, "The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth." Barclay Cap. XXVII, p. 218. Cities Petrus Bertrandus, Pius V. - Cardinal Cusa supports his statement.
Through infant baptism, keeping sacraments, church membership, going to mass, praying to Mary, and confession (just to mention a few), the Catholic church has developed a system of salvation through WORKS. God's word says that we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, not through works". "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." (Eph. 2:8-9)
Listen, everybody. I do not condone SSPX, or any other schismatic group that claims to be Catholic, nor do I reject the authority of Vatican II. My love for the traditional mass is nostalgic...
1. Glorifying God in a solemn beautiful way
2. Use of Latin in the Liturgy.
If you adhere to this afore stated creed then you are following in the true spirit of Benedict XVI and Vatican II.
Let me make this clear Vatican II good, motu proprio, good, SSPX bad, schisms bad.
@BlackCappa Yes it is. I am well aware of Benedict XVI withdrawing the excommunication of the four SSPX bishops in 1984, but the SSPX still deny the validity of the Novus Ordo, and by extension the Chair of Peter, and the unamimous Catholic Church at Vatican II, and they have repeatedly denied reconciliation into the Catholic Church under John Paul II and now Benedict the XVI.
@BlackCappa They may have valid sacraments. But like the Eastern Orthodox churches, they are performed under the guise of a bishop who is not in communion with Rome. They are not licit, and any person who is a faithful catholic should not go to the SSPX chapel. Find a Motu Mass nearby. seriously people. Or maybe instead of whining about how you don't like the reverence of the NO at your church, be vocal and try to make it more reverent. atthe very least pray for the mass, and the mother church.
They are - in a way a different case: they are still seen as Catholics - though very close to schism: the E"O" have set up a rival episcopate which formalizes their schism. The SSPX - as of now - have refrained from any claims to episcopal jurisdiction.
"be vocal and try to make it more reverent. atthe very least pray for the mass, and the mother church"
Please do not assume to know what I do or do not do.
@BlackCappa My apologies for seeming rude. I didn't mean to presume what you pray for. Most of the people I have come across on this video are SSPX who don't believe in the validity of the NO. However that being the case, the SSPX is not a cannonical group within the catholic church because of its doctrinal differences from the church. This from the statement released february of last year by the Vatican.
@BlackCappa They deny teachings of Vatican II, Paul VI John paul and John Paul II and Benedict XVI and they operate their chapels within diocese outside of the authority of the Diocesean Bishop. Any person belonging to the Catholic Church should not go to these churches because the sacraments are performed without regard for the authority of the Bishop and and canon law, and are offered by people who do not accept the primacy of peter. Really there is nothing more to it than that.
@kiwichristian2009 sire, this is a video for catholics, if you don't stop using post hoc propter hoc, non sequitor, and strawmen arguments I will block you. I no longer tolerate that tom foolery.
I agree...Vatican 2 will unfortunately stay for a while, Vatican 3 will be here and the dreaded novus ordo will be wiped out completely...there is more heavenly peace in the Latin Mass. I was at a novus ordo, and I was trying to pray and say the rosary, but I kept on getting distracted by a priest talking in english. The only times I could pray was when he was silent! Now what does that tell you!lol
when your at a mass your not supposed to pray the rosary, what's important there is christ upon the altar, not an individual devotion. say the rosary outside of mass.
Its not proper though. the rosary is great for private devotion. mass is not private. It is the public communal worship of the church, the great communal sacrafice and banquet. saying a rosary at mass is rude to the priest who offers it on behalf of you, and those around you who try to pay attention and find it difficult when you move your lips, or finger the rosary beads. the rosary should be said before or after mass, not during.
Did you ever think of the possiblity that Benny just lied to you, again? Vatican II not probably implemented? You still have to deal with "Dignitatis Humanae" and "Nostra Aetate" Both documents defy Christian teachings. Religious liberty is against Christ, because it validates other religions. Then we have to look on the ordination and consceration rites since 1969, who are, according to the rules of Pope Pius IX, invalid. Therefore the Roman Catholic Church is not Catholic.
is that really necessary? I love this mass too but just because my priest doesnt want to say it doesnt mean im gonna lump him in with the 1% of priests who screwed up.
please refrain from calling gays fags just because sodomy is a sin doesn't mean we should be hateful towards them. Jesus says Love your neighbor as yourself
Love your video, especially the text at the end. I believe the Novus Ordo is in its last days, and our ancient Rite will once again be on every altar in the world. CHRISTUS VINCIT! CHRISTUS REGNAT! CHRISTUS IMPERAT!
Sorry, but there are five principal rites of the Catholic Church -- the Roman rite and four others. The other rites are just as Catholic as the Roman Rite, and use their own liturgy, and have never used the Tridentine Mass. You really should learn something about the universal Catholic church if you are going to write about it on the worldwide web.
Sorry to post off topic but could someone please advise me on the titles of some more Latin Roman Catholic songs? BTW, does anyone know the name of the song used in the Ace of Base song "Happy Nation?"
well there is victimae paschali laudes, and vidi aquam, tantum ergo, o saltaris hostia, pange lingua, stabat mater, o maria maris stella, de profundis, adorabo, cantemus domine, exsultet, crucem tuum, ave maria, deus iustum est, maria matrem virginem, in paradisum, aedeste fideles, veni veni emmanuel, haec dies alleluia, dona eis, panis angelis, calendis chirstmastide, dominus illuminatio, adorate deum, and many many others.
a warning to all users, if your comments contain foul language or are abrasive and rude. I will block you from commenting here. If your anti- catholic send me an email of why don't like my video or keep your fingers off the keyboard. Its disrespectful to the other views and people leaving comments
parish = perish... all roman cathoic will perish in hell if they do not get out of this pagan babylonian cult called the Roman Catholic Whore Church.. see revelation 17
This is not the place for this critisism, if you have something bad to say, email me. I always respond. don't patronize the other viewers by leaving this junk here. that goes for your other one as well.
@jesuitinfiltrator Amen. Just as Cain vainly tried to impress God with the works of his hands, so do Catholics try to impress God with their good works and ceremonialism.
@kiwichristian2009 Do this in memory of me. The mass is an institution of Christ. Don't so negative, your negativeity stems from a lack of understanding. If there is something you don't understand, ask, don't jump to criticism. Seek and you shall find.
@virumdei My friend. Yes, we are to observe the last supper in memory of Christs' sacrifice. However, The very record of history, (Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Cyprian and Hippolytus) which the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches love to quote as authority, proves that before 200 AD, the church viewed the bread and juice as symbols. Conversely, the earliest historical hint of transubstantiation was in the 4th century.
@kiwichristian2009 "I desire the bread of God, the heavenly bread, the bread of life- which is the flesh of Jesus Christ the Son of God." Ignatius 105 ad
"The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 1 Cor. 11:16
"[the wine and bread] having been recieved by the Word of God become the Eucharist, which is the body and blood of Christ." Ireneaus 180ad
@virumdei Transubstantiation is a false doctrine because Jesus is not a liar: In Mt 26:29 after Jesus had said, "this is my blood" and prayed, he still referred to the contents as, "fruit of the vine". If transubstantiation of the juice into blood had occurred, as both Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches say it was at this time, then Jesus would never have referred to it as "fruit of the vine' but rather "blood". ..
@virumdei ...This proves that when Jesus said "take eat & drink" he LITERALLY gave them bread and juice. In like manner, Paul also refers to the elements of the Lord's Supper as "eat this bread and drink the cup" in 1 Cor 11:26 after they should be transubstantiated.
@virumdei As far as the New Testament is concerned, Jesus didn't pluck part of His flesh out to be eaten by His disciples at the Last Supper, which should be the primary example of celebrating the Lord's Supper afterwards. Where does the Bible say that the bread actually turns into Christ's flesh? The Last Supper was also symbolic, the Lord's supper is symbolic. Jesus Christ's sacrifice on the cross was the one true real thing.
@virumdei When Christ said to eat His body and drink His blood He was speaking figuratively, not literally. The Book of John also says "unless a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God." Does this mean we need to be pushed out of our mother's womb again? Of course not. That would be impossible. Christ offered His body and blood on the cross for us. He wants us to accept His body and blood sacrifice for the atonement of our sins.
@virumdei Transubstantiation is a false doctrine because Jesus instituted Lord’s Supper before his blood was shed and body broken! He spoke of His blood being shed, which was still yet future. This proves it was a symbol.
@kiwichristian2009 Jesus is God and can manifest his body whenever he wants. The Language used in John 6 is very clear that Jesus is talking about actual consumption. Jesus never uses symbolic terms here, and has never clarified that he was using symbolic terms here or anywhere else. The denial of the real prescence is a very new doctrine, only taking hold during the reformation, which had no historical backing except primarily in heresies that died during the first centuries of Christianity.
@kiwichristian2009 Jesus is refered to as the bread of life, many times, thus contrasting the manna in John 6 with his body saying "your ancestors ate manna in the desert and died but this bread whoever shall eat it will have life." If the eucharistic bread were merely common bread, than in actuality it would not be superior to the manna because the manna was miraculous heavenly bread, and not earthly common bread.
OKay guys, seriously, If you are anti-Catholic, why do you even bother watching Catholic videos. If you are confused about Catholic doctrine, why are you being so dissmissive instead of receptive. kiwichristian2009 is now block for being rude, and and insulting our religion. If you aren't Catholic but love Mary the mother of the Saviour, then welcome, If you have questions about Catholicism by all means ask. If you seek to enrage, or post nasty, dissmisive comments do not or I will block you.
virumdei 1 year ago 2
Laus Tibi Christe
yellowballpoets 1 year ago
Writers on the Canon Law say, "The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in heaven and earth." Barclay Cap. XXVII, p. 218. Cities Petrus Bertrandus, Pius V. - Cardinal Cusa supports his statement.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Through infant baptism, keeping sacraments, church membership, going to mass, praying to Mary, and confession (just to mention a few), the Catholic church has developed a system of salvation through WORKS. God's word says that we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, not through works". "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." (Eph. 2:8-9)
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
Listen, everybody. I do not condone SSPX, or any other schismatic group that claims to be Catholic, nor do I reject the authority of Vatican II. My love for the traditional mass is nostalgic...
1. Glorifying God in a solemn beautiful way
2. Use of Latin in the Liturgy.
If you adhere to this afore stated creed then you are following in the true spirit of Benedict XVI and Vatican II.
Let me make this clear Vatican II good, motu proprio, good, SSPX bad, schisms bad.
virumdei 1 year ago
@virumdei
The SSPX is not in schism.
BlackCappa 1 year ago
@BlackCappa Yes it is. I am well aware of Benedict XVI withdrawing the excommunication of the four SSPX bishops in 1984, but the SSPX still deny the validity of the Novus Ordo, and by extension the Chair of Peter, and the unamimous Catholic Church at Vatican II, and they have repeatedly denied reconciliation into the Catholic Church under John Paul II and now Benedict the XVI.
virumdei 1 year ago
@virumdei
I am not going to argue for a disobedient community, but it was Ecclesia Dei that gave the statement that the SSPX are not (yet) formally in schism.
And the SSPX does not deny the validity of the OF as far as I know: but they do condemn it as "harmful to the faith".
BlackCappa 1 year ago
@BlackCappa They may have valid sacraments. But like the Eastern Orthodox churches, they are performed under the guise of a bishop who is not in communion with Rome. They are not licit, and any person who is a faithful catholic should not go to the SSPX chapel. Find a Motu Mass nearby. seriously people. Or maybe instead of whining about how you don't like the reverence of the NO at your church, be vocal and try to make it more reverent. atthe very least pray for the mass, and the mother church.
virumdei 1 year ago
@virumdei
They are - in a way a different case: they are still seen as Catholics - though very close to schism: the E"O" have set up a rival episcopate which formalizes their schism. The SSPX - as of now - have refrained from any claims to episcopal jurisdiction.
"be vocal and try to make it more reverent. atthe very least pray for the mass, and the mother church"
Please do not assume to know what I do or do not do.
BlackCappa 1 year ago
@BlackCappa My apologies for seeming rude. I didn't mean to presume what you pray for. Most of the people I have come across on this video are SSPX who don't believe in the validity of the NO. However that being the case, the SSPX is not a cannonical group within the catholic church because of its doctrinal differences from the church. This from the statement released february of last year by the Vatican.
virumdei 1 year ago
@BlackCappa They deny teachings of Vatican II, Paul VI John paul and John Paul II and Benedict XVI and they operate their chapels within diocese outside of the authority of the Diocesean Bishop. Any person belonging to the Catholic Church should not go to these churches because the sacraments are performed without regard for the authority of the Bishop and and canon law, and are offered by people who do not accept the primacy of peter. Really there is nothing more to it than that.
virumdei 1 year ago
@virumdei Who determines what is or is not a "valid" sacrament?
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@kiwichristian2009 sire, this is a video for catholics, if you don't stop using post hoc propter hoc, non sequitor, and strawmen arguments I will block you. I no longer tolerate that tom foolery.
virumdei 1 year ago
@virumdei First of all, i only speak english, the common language of the world. Secondly, i challenge you to disprove anything i have said.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
I agree...Vatican 2 will unfortunately stay for a while, Vatican 3 will be here and the dreaded novus ordo will be wiped out completely...there is more heavenly peace in the Latin Mass. I was at a novus ordo, and I was trying to pray and say the rosary, but I kept on getting distracted by a priest talking in english. The only times I could pray was when he was silent! Now what does that tell you!lol
cks125 3 years ago
when your at a mass your not supposed to pray the rosary, what's important there is christ upon the altar, not an individual devotion. say the rosary outside of mass.
virumdei 2 years ago
You can listen to the Mass praying the rosary, its valid to do it.
thebosz 2 years ago
Its not proper though. the rosary is great for private devotion. mass is not private. It is the public communal worship of the church, the great communal sacrafice and banquet. saying a rosary at mass is rude to the priest who offers it on behalf of you, and those around you who try to pay attention and find it difficult when you move your lips, or finger the rosary beads. the rosary should be said before or after mass, not during.
virumdei 2 years ago
Card. Ratzingar, now Pope Benedict XVI dismissed a Vatican III, beacuase Vatican II has not yet been propally implemented.
IE, We have been lied to.
dacatholicbandorgan 2 years ago
Did you ever think of the possiblity that Benny just lied to you, again? Vatican II not probably implemented? You still have to deal with "Dignitatis Humanae" and "Nostra Aetate" Both documents defy Christian teachings. Religious liberty is against Christ, because it validates other religions. Then we have to look on the ordination and consceration rites since 1969, who are, according to the rules of Pope Pius IX, invalid. Therefore the Roman Catholic Church is not Catholic.
Floesser1970 2 years ago
Most Excellent from an old Alter Boy! From the 1960's! Unscathed by the fags and sodomites in this our church!
georgepickett 3 years ago
is that really necessary? I love this mass too but just because my priest doesnt want to say it doesnt mean im gonna lump him in with the 1% of priests who screwed up.
Winaska 3 years ago 4
please refrain from calling gays fags just because sodomy is a sin doesn't mean we should be hateful towards them. Jesus says Love your neighbor as yourself
virumdei 2 years ago
Does anyone know where I can find a free Mp3 file of the song?
cunaboy213 3 years ago
Love your video, especially the text at the end. I believe the Novus Ordo is in its last days, and our ancient Rite will once again be on every altar in the world. CHRISTUS VINCIT! CHRISTUS REGNAT! CHRISTUS IMPERAT!
dontwanto 3 years ago
Sorry, but there are five principal rites of the Catholic Church -- the Roman rite and four others. The other rites are just as Catholic as the Roman Rite, and use their own liturgy, and have never used the Tridentine Mass. You really should learn something about the universal Catholic church if you are going to write about it on the worldwide web.
mindspring57 3 years ago
Excellent!
degocamon 3 years ago
Sorry to post off topic but could someone please advise me on the titles of some more Latin Roman Catholic songs? BTW, does anyone know the name of the song used in the Ace of Base song "Happy Nation?"
JungleListSoldier 4 years ago
Do you want Gregorian chants? You could just google Gregorian Chant and you'll have a whole list to chose from.
You can also google Latin prayers in song and you might get a lot.
Peace & God Bless.
Sandy
1Hope4All 4 years ago 3
well there is victimae paschali laudes, and vidi aquam, tantum ergo, o saltaris hostia, pange lingua, stabat mater, o maria maris stella, de profundis, adorabo, cantemus domine, exsultet, crucem tuum, ave maria, deus iustum est, maria matrem virginem, in paradisum, aedeste fideles, veni veni emmanuel, haec dies alleluia, dona eis, panis angelis, calendis chirstmastide, dominus illuminatio, adorate deum, and many many others.
virumdei 4 years ago
Though I have not suffered under the Novus Ordo, I am moving to an area where the Mass of Ages is offered weekly. Thanks for posting!
AnbaKyrillos 4 years ago
The church at 0:17 is St. Patrick's in New Orleans. I've been to Latin Mass there many times, it's truly awesome.
Well done, thanks for posting !
gopman64 4 years ago 2
Laus Tibi Christe....The Tridentine Mass is the best.
DrPohteeyeh 4 years ago 5
a warning to all users, if your comments contain foul language or are abrasive and rude. I will block you from commenting here. If your anti- catholic send me an email of why don't like my video or keep your fingers off the keyboard. Its disrespectful to the other views and people leaving comments
virumdei 4 years ago
virumdei, thanks for the video that you created...it really reminds me how grateful i am to be a traditional catholic.
durayclear 4 years ago
Why Thank you.
virumdei 4 years ago
demons and wicked spirits who are from hell love chanting and musical deceptions well also... are you brainwashed or what???
jesuitinfiltrator 4 years ago
Laus Tibi Christe!
gattetto 4 years ago
The Song is Gustate et Videte
"Gustate et Videte Suavis est Dominus,"
Taste and see how gracious the Lord is"
virumdei 4 years ago
Thanks
gertrudag 4 years ago 2
Your welcome :)
virumdei 4 years ago
Thanks, good luck at your new parish. God bless. :)
virumdei 4 years ago
parish = perish... all roman cathoic will perish in hell if they do not get out of this pagan babylonian cult called the Roman Catholic Whore Church.. see revelation 17
jesuitinfiltrator 4 years ago
This is not the place for this critisism, if you have something bad to say, email me. I always respond. don't patronize the other viewers by leaving this junk here. that goes for your other one as well.
virumdei 4 years ago
@jesuitinfiltrator Amen. Just as Cain vainly tried to impress God with the works of his hands, so do Catholics try to impress God with their good works and ceremonialism.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@kiwichristian2009 Do this in memory of me. The mass is an institution of Christ. Don't so negative, your negativeity stems from a lack of understanding. If there is something you don't understand, ask, don't jump to criticism. Seek and you shall find.
virumdei 1 year ago
@virumdei My friend. Yes, we are to observe the last supper in memory of Christs' sacrifice. However, The very record of history, (Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Cyprian and Hippolytus) which the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches love to quote as authority, proves that before 200 AD, the church viewed the bread and juice as symbols. Conversely, the earliest historical hint of transubstantiation was in the 4th century.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@kiwichristian2009 "I desire the bread of God, the heavenly bread, the bread of life- which is the flesh of Jesus Christ the Son of God." Ignatius 105 ad
"The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? 1 Cor. 11:16
"[the wine and bread] having been recieved by the Word of God become the Eucharist, which is the body and blood of Christ." Ireneaus 180ad
no historical hint huh?
virumdei 1 year ago
@virumdei Transubstantiation is a false doctrine because Jesus is not a liar: In Mt 26:29 after Jesus had said, "this is my blood" and prayed, he still referred to the contents as, "fruit of the vine". If transubstantiation of the juice into blood had occurred, as both Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches say it was at this time, then Jesus would never have referred to it as "fruit of the vine' but rather "blood". ..
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@virumdei ...This proves that when Jesus said "take eat & drink" he LITERALLY gave them bread and juice. In like manner, Paul also refers to the elements of the Lord's Supper as "eat this bread and drink the cup" in 1 Cor 11:26 after they should be transubstantiated.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@virumdei As far as the New Testament is concerned, Jesus didn't pluck part of His flesh out to be eaten by His disciples at the Last Supper, which should be the primary example of celebrating the Lord's Supper afterwards. Where does the Bible say that the bread actually turns into Christ's flesh? The Last Supper was also symbolic, the Lord's supper is symbolic. Jesus Christ's sacrifice on the cross was the one true real thing.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@virumdei When Christ said to eat His body and drink His blood He was speaking figuratively, not literally. The Book of John also says "unless a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God." Does this mean we need to be pushed out of our mother's womb again? Of course not. That would be impossible. Christ offered His body and blood on the cross for us. He wants us to accept His body and blood sacrifice for the atonement of our sins.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@virumdei Transubstantiation is a false doctrine because Jesus instituted Lord’s Supper before his blood was shed and body broken! He spoke of His blood being shed, which was still yet future. This proves it was a symbol.
kiwichristian2009 1 year ago
@kiwichristian2009 Jesus is God and can manifest his body whenever he wants. The Language used in John 6 is very clear that Jesus is talking about actual consumption. Jesus never uses symbolic terms here, and has never clarified that he was using symbolic terms here or anywhere else. The denial of the real prescence is a very new doctrine, only taking hold during the reformation, which had no historical backing except primarily in heresies that died during the first centuries of Christianity.
virumdei 1 year ago
@kiwichristian2009 Jesus is refered to as the bread of life, many times, thus contrasting the manna in John 6 with his body saying "your ancestors ate manna in the desert and died but this bread whoever shall eat it will have life." If the eucharistic bread were merely common bread, than in actuality it would not be superior to the manna because the manna was miraculous heavenly bread, and not earthly common bread.
virumdei 1 year ago