On his first tours of the US in the 1950s, apparently he responded to praise of him as the greatest USSR pianist by saying "Wait till you hear Richter". Most seem to have interpreted him as saying that Richter was even better than him, but I think he could have meant 'Wait till you hear Richter... and then decide.' Anyway there's no doubt both were equally great but in their own way. :)
tutti lo fanno molto veloce, ma a questo andamento viene fuori molta più musica.E' assai più facile ingoiare un metronomo,ma i risultati sono quelli che contano!
Whoa! Listen to Gilels left hand at 4:24, so typical for a waltz. Gilels and Arrau are the only ones who made them audible. Most just prefer to play the whole passage more brilliant.
If you like the way Gilels plays it, you should check out Amir Katz interpretation. Krystian Zimerman also does a nice job as well. What do you think?
I have been waiting for this performance for over 45 years! It's the only one I've ever heard performed at the proper tempo. It completely embodies Clara Schumann's reflections on how the piece should be played, especially the final movement. She warns specifically against rushing and losing the "waltz feel" that should be maintained throughout. Coupled with Gilels' usual technical mastery, dynamics, phrasing, musicianship..etc, this may be the greatest performance of this great work ever!
That's what I've read as well. Arrau, Bolet and Lympani played this at a similarly slower-than-normally-heard-today tempo. Also I've read books where Clara Schumann pupils warn against rushing it. :)
after 4:59 there're many fasle notes..
I like this performance!! nice! ღღღღღღ
nocturne217 1 year ago
It IS in my opinion the best performance. I really love Kovacevich's too, but Gilels is the best.
Did Gilels really walk about saying Richter was better than him? I read that he said that often when he was touring the US.
SpottyDorsord 2 years ago 3
On his first tours of the US in the 1950s, apparently he responded to praise of him as the greatest USSR pianist by saying "Wait till you hear Richter". Most seem to have interpreted him as saying that Richter was even better than him, but I think he could have meant 'Wait till you hear Richter... and then decide.' Anyway there's no doubt both were equally great but in their own way. :)
UGTownsend 2 years ago
tempo and interpretation made it very classy... :)
lurk1ng 2 years ago 3
tutti lo fanno molto veloce, ma a questo andamento viene fuori molta più musica.E' assai più facile ingoiare un metronomo,ma i risultati sono quelli che contano!
opera54
povepupe 3 years ago 4
what are the chord progressions from 3:58 to 4:15?
NNomad 3 years ago 2
@NNomad ist just a sequence of falling fifths with major 7, beginning with D
Masmorra84 1 year ago
Whoa! Listen to Gilels left hand at 4:24, so typical for a waltz. Gilels and Arrau are the only ones who made them audible. Most just prefer to play the whole passage more brilliant.
vezzmon 3 years ago 6
yes, he does it wonderfully, doesn't he :)
kellnergram 3 years ago 2
If you like the way Gilels plays it, you should check out Amir Katz interpretation. Krystian Zimerman also does a nice job as well. What do you think?
Poohbear0340 2 years ago
I have been waiting for this performance for over 45 years! It's the only one I've ever heard performed at the proper tempo. It completely embodies Clara Schumann's reflections on how the piece should be played, especially the final movement. She warns specifically against rushing and losing the "waltz feel" that should be maintained throughout. Coupled with Gilels' usual technical mastery, dynamics, phrasing, musicianship..etc, this may be the greatest performance of this great work ever!
michsturge 3 years ago 10
That's what I've read as well. Arrau, Bolet and Lympani played this at a similarly slower-than-normally-heard-today tempo. Also I've read books where Clara Schumann pupils warn against rushing it. :)
UGTownsend 2 years ago
@michsturge Somehow the "wrong tempo" Mitsuko Uchida's performance of the same piece is better )
mobubabe 2 months ago
Allegro Vivace is not about speed but character."Munter und Lebendig" would be the
german translation.
callasnuts 4 years ago
Wow... He really makes this tempo work, and all the counterpoint is so clear in the orchestra at this tempo. It sounds almost like Brahms.
bsmusicd 4 years ago 3
Wonderful! I love the tempo.
Burnsomatic 4 years ago 3
Sooo many more vids of Horowitz, but even he cant match Emil Gilels for top spot. What say you?
crazyboyhere 4 years ago
oh, i love the tempo!! it's his style
elineangelica 4 years ago
How come he plays so slow for this movement? The orchestra also... I thought it suppose to be allegro vivace?
bozovilla 4 years ago