nasa crashes a plane

[AnotherSchmoe]

Wouldn't want to be on that plane!

[robertdevald]

When it said; "nasa crashes a plane" I thought it was about 9/11. I'm just sayin'.

[footballbird]

if you post this on 3 comments you will get a kiss from your crush

[ss2gernade4]

That was test of how much damage it coul withstand lol

[jrporter75]

0:26 oh crap

[IDONTKNOWWHYTOO]

its a boeing 707

[dyingangelo]

this is a pretty cheap experiment eh??

[MrMinifigure]

This is at the begging of the Destroyed In Seconds theme! thumbs if you agree!

[90909009]

why does the plane have the cornish flag on its tail. cornwall is a county in the UK for all you that don't know

[Nesquik775]

@90909009 Was probably bought from them.

[blink2k]

Wonder how much of our tax money paid for that. Nice job NASA(not!)

[xach1090]

Test nothing, they just got bored and said " Hey do we have anything in the hanger we can blow up?"lol

[namelessmichael]

interesting. but surely they don't need to ruin an airplane to test that

[xach1090]

After planes are in use for so many years they are decommissioned, this was most likely on of those planes.

[soureysen]

@namelessmichael well a practical test always gives a better result than computer simulations. besides it may have been an old plane that already recovered its cost.

[totaldaniel6052]

a plane from sweden???  0:15

[ghettoperson257]

@totaldaniel6052 no its an Amercan Boeing 707/720 test plane

[anas272829]

all the people died exapet me

[UpToWnPsYcHo]

They tested this before orchestrating 9/11, may they R.I.P. this theorizes the gov. was involved

[MrFastfrog]

looks like a demo flight of one of our dear Airbus...

[ghettoperson257]

@MrFastfrog its a Boeing 707/720 not an Airbus

[MrFastfrog]

looks like a demo flight of one of our dear Airbus...

[suroj]

Crap.. Could I try that again?

[Olliboy101]

OMG big flames !!!!!

[TheBrad95]

there was fuel spilling out the back end

[doddling]

Not a bad landing

[repeatedjellyfish]

I like how they say it was controlled.

[trackmaniack]

controlled my ass lol

[Greenlord91]

Was anybody in the plane hurt???

[joeEXplosion]

there was no one in the plane.

[PSPGENIUS714]

xD some of these comments are funny

[MrToontown360]

AIRPLANE GO BOOM :D

[satweavers]

The idea here was to test a foaming agent added to the fuel that was supposed to make plane crashes less dangerous. There were steel blades on the ground that were supposed to shear through the fuel tanks, but the remote pilot missed and one of the blades sliced right through a turbine engine, which, naturally, exploded dramatically/

[jiltedkiller]

I'd love to meet the man who thought "Do you know what I'm going to do today? Crash a plane." That's the ingenuity we need to get out of the recession.

[MsOLAF1972]

I'm not english nor understand anything of what they are talking about here!

They do not know some chicks to have some drinks and ... who knows!

Jorge Costa, I am also tuga, man. Go have a drink with them.

[0100110101001011]

why must i watch this stuff b4 flying?

[vada2000]

old plane remote controlled testing new fuel that was not supposed to explode damn yall watch some history channel or discovery shit

[ghettoperson257]

@vada2000 the fuel is flammable what do you expect???

[manosman97]

those americans are crazy

[Aervu]

What's with the Pilot?

[ghettoperson257]

@Aervu its remote controlled not a pilot-in-cockpit crash

[mrzipdisk]

That, is a shitty job.

[blacklight0]

u guys are fools to believe that the plane itself took down the wtc.. pitty

[Jahazdaabba1]

WOah!!such big fire

[hcgnkhu]

too much fuel in the fuel tanks probably

[krakowia88]

Nasa is pretty dumb..

[camvvti]

how so?

[jorgecosta95]

why?

[krakowia88]

Because if they know how to fly spaceships then flying airplanes should be extremely easy for them.

[jorgecosta95]

they , destroied a plane to test omfg , they destoryed it because they wanted , omfg ur so noob !they qere testing plane wrecks

[krakowia88]

Well that is a waste of time and money.

[jorgecosta95]

so why you eat ? its a waste to , look , yo get new things u need to test ok?

[krakowia88]

I eat because it gives me energy. What do you think.

[jorgecosta95]

ok but , the tests are made because they need it ok? btw it was an old plane so who cares?

[krakowia88]

Well instead of wasting an airplane they should have donated it to Africa.

[jorgecosta95]

omg. so why do you use paper ? u dont need of paper to live. THEY WERE TESTING do you know what is testing?

[krakowia88]

I never said that I needed paper.

[TXxAggie2013xFTW]

so why are you speaking jorge? you dirty beaner, maybe you should learn some basic grammar.

[jorgecosta95]

@TXxAggie2013xFTW hey fy , im not english do u undertand?! or u have problems stupid asshole?!

[jpwashere112]

They was all board as all hell on that day. Had to something to pass the time I guess..

[skinnywhop87]

Are you sure this isn't Sandia labs test? I know they do a lot of work with NASA, and i remember seeing a few crash tests like this done out there

[dj88nascar1]

It was actually a test done by nasa, the plane was remote controlled by a test pilot, they intentionally crashed it to rip open the right wing to test how jet fuel ignites when it vaporizes in a crash...

[32joel]

everywhere you read about it, it say they were testing a new fuel additive which WAS MENT to make it less flammable, judging by the video it didnt work

[jorgecosta95]

yes it worked , but not much , it dont explodes , it burns only

[TheConyeWest]

@dj88nascar1 it works.

[Farismaster1]

@dj88nascar1 actually strong winds prevented the pilot on the ground to land it was supposed to hit the landing block head on at the nose but he overjudged and caused an accident

[b1gbird001]

@dj88nascar1 wrong

@satweavers right

[2intoxicate4u]

omg....how did they do that without hurting someone????

[NonDairyCreamer77]

its an unmanned plane.

[ghettoperson257]

@2intoxicate4u no one was inside the plane at the time

[coyote7272]

It's a different plane, a Test one... hopefully to see how they get prevent crashes and fix things that cause deaths when a plane does crash.

or they just wanted to have fun

[woodsprout]

If they are crash testing for "fun" then they just lost their jobs. Too much expense and hard work put into assembling a jet, and then cleaning up afterward.

[WARzone4912]

you are all dickheads the frigen plane is a test watch on national gegrafic channe~!~!~!

[PsychedelicDubs]

lmao how the fuck can yuu call these guys dicks when your tellin em to watch national geographic channel lmao what a cock throb! ahaha.

[CurlyGirly33]

well.. wowee ..there was ACTUAL DEBRIS leftover!! I can't believe my eyes!! You mean when a plane crashes into the ground it actually leave debris?? Oh my .. i can't believe it !!

but .... if this is true.. when a plane crashes on land and leaves pieces of debris..then how come there was no debris left over in Pennsylvania when the 9/11 plane crashed in a soft cushy green grassed field?? or the Pentagon?? ... where was the debris then?

can someone please explain this to me??

[YOWHATTHEHELLUP71]

angel of incident

[qwerty4255]

if u compare a plane of the same model as the one that hit the pentagon, u notice the plane's wings and rudders don't fit the hole or leave marks.. maybe they fell off? or not?

[bob75ify]

shut up bitch,go spread ur shit somewhere else

[ImperialUprising]

First off, the plane smashed into the ground at very high speeds, Everything was BOOM. The biggest chunk they found was like 1 ft big.

[thesjlf]

crash test for safer fuel

and the test dummys were not hurt at all just ratttled

[djahriman]

Apparently the "Plane" that hit the Pentagon was carrying similar amounts of fuel...... but the explosion wasnt that big.....

Epic lulz

[PaulTheuns]

that isent even funny

[djahriman]

Sheep.

[PaulTheuns]

why that?

you laugh when people die?

i assume then that you never had the event that someone close to you dies-.-

[djahriman]

Well. Forgive me for assuming that people with double digit iq's, such as yourself, would be capable of understanding what I was getting at with my previous comment.

Let me spell it out. A plane never hit the Pentagon. Several things prove this, but let's view this case in point shall we so you can shut up and I can go back to my dinner.

Note how the fuel in this plane crash burnt. Look closely. Now compare that with whatever hit the Pentagon.

If you still don't get it, you never will.

[TheRemingtondude]

ya it was

[shinsen498]

is this a crash test?

[canthaguild]

yes it says that at beggining of video

[TheKidEleKtRo]

And everyone would get up with minor paper cuts, brush of their jeans and walk home with their head bowed down. lmaooo (if it had ppl in it)

[pjm5678]

man the slo mo is beutiful! XD

[SwiftScoobyC]

funny that, remote control planes? seen that before havent we? open your eyes you sheep

[swamisom]

who's the idiot who volunteered to fly that crash test?!

[TheImperialNinjA]

thats a lot of fire, and people thinking raging fires like that cant take out some building reinforcements in the wtc...

[SimonMcTavish]

It was because the plane carried a large amount of fuel

[Shock909]

oh my god HOW DID THAT HAPPEN SO MUCH FIRE did the people die :(

[djahriman]

LOL

[GreenKab]

not a fail, it was done on purpose as part of a test.

[bbcrazyben]

Fail lol

[TehPowerLand]

Was this the crash where it went out of control?

Im probably wrong :P

[miked860]

They crashed this plane to test a supposedly less flammable type of fuel.

[TehPowerLand]

I mean the fire. :P

[ZibbyWabbles]

couldnt they just lite the fuel on fire? lol

[miked860]

They wanted to simulate a crash with the new fuel The only way to do that was to crash a plane.

[TitusRTeh1337Bassist]

the flames look like a solar flare at :29

[iwouldddd]

salesman: get some torches..? anyone?

[kingdud99]

its a test

[Syeno]

hmmm... remote controlled air planes... wonder what would happen if they were flown into a building or 2... hint hint... cuz i know of some planes that "crashed" but r actually still flying around to this day... ive been on 1 of them.

[767deltaairlines]

wich one?

[Syeno]

the one that flew into a certain 'shape' of a building. i cant say more =3

[pilotoatomico]

what you say its true. An RC airplaned was crashed in the pentagon.

[Cleoxide]

You' an idiot.

[Syeno]

yeah, IM the idiot.

[MRNSMO]

i agree ..

its a bit weird ae

[VMFA115Starloric]

The 34 inch Model F117 from RC Super Powers?

Ey, we've all seen that

[Hexxle]

It did burn more, but apparently that would have saved the lives of the passengers - I can't remember how, though. This is from my chemistry teacher, who must be freakin smarter than God himself.

[nikos3232]

its a test saw it on tv

[cjtudor]

well done captain obvious.

[imboor3d]

same, they testing different types of feul to find more safe, les explosive ones in the event of a crash

[harjinder14]

holy s***! did they like fill the fueselage with gasoline??? theres so much fire!!!

[lupau69]

its avgas as soon as you lite it up the whole plane is an inferno even if its just in the wings

[ahmadrobr1]

if no one is driving the plane then who is this fault!! XD

[MGTUBE4]

OH MY GOSH

[cornishrob123]

how come she has a st pirans flag on her tail ? lol

[SPRules44]

I think that this was to test a new kind of Jet Fuel, which was supposed to burn less than the fuel used today. The test was a complete failure, and it ended up burning more.

[faustsotam78]

hollyoowd film

[legominifigure7]

nice landing! XD

[gardenblake]

This test was, unfortunately, a PR failure, though, not entirely, a scientific one. It was a Remotely Piloted B720 in a CID, designed to "Crash-test" a "Safety Fuel"... AMK (Anti-misting Kerosene). Contrary to a number of posts here, it was not a "Gel-Based" fuel but "ordinary" Avtur with a VERY high molecular weight long-chain- polymer added to it: in UK, we got as far as FM9. (Fuel Modification, 9th version; which, in reality was probably closer to FM25; but politically, that was undesirable.)

[evenk93]

They flew this thing with a remote control, isn't that amazing?

[BartekSf16]

Oglądałem to na discovery koleś nim sterował zdalnie ale go zniosło zdeczka na lewo i po teście ;))

[sebianoti]

aha. kiedy?

[BartekSf16]

Nie pamiętam ale z rok temu. Koleś co kierowal tym samolotem spapral sprawe i  juz testu nie powtorzono.

[sebianoti]

widze dlaczego lol

[DrHMFIC]

[don't forget to check that brilliant YouTube video on Satan's face in the smoke cloud next tothe WTC]

[d0low0life]

people actually think they used a a pilot

[grodan70]

That was a remote plane, stop crying :/

[stopthosenabobs]

I feel sorry for the pilot who had to do this test.

But he was at least a brave man of whom we can learn a lot!

[McIntyreJack]

ya know, I'm guessing they didn't actually put a pilot in the seat and watch him crash into a fireball.

I'm pretty sure those giant metal boxes have the ability to fly themselves.

[namewho305]

Lol..

yes poor pilot. I think a human life is more valubale and NASA cant put a pilot in there. ever thought of remote controls?

[zoopalsrcool]

readings for fags who dont have a life

[lukacepin94]

thise plane was remote control so it was hard to navigate.

:|

[DrHMFIC]

geez, these NASA guys really get into some crazy practical jokes on each other, huh?

The pilot here musta been thinkin', "Man, I'm gonna so get the bastard who fucked with my landing gear."

[namewho305]

HAHA lol good joke.

[DrHMFIC]

Sure, laugh. but what I meant to say was, Hey, this is obviously proof NOT that there was a 9/11 "conspiracy", but that there was a 9/11 "stupidity": if you look really, really close, kinda squint ur eyes a bit...maybe smoke a meth-a-whatever soaked joint, and hold your breath, you can see the pilot. W/ a BEARD! See it?

Well, this is documentation of an alQaeda guy trying to learn to fly these. THIS is why they gave up on bothering to learn landing for any what-if's. FBI shoulda caught it..

[purplehepo]

that is so fake . Who can believe this stuff.

If people think it's real then who is recording it . UH!!!

[trasher84]

lol at the beginning its said "controlled impact demonstration"

[trezor000]

lol thats funny

[emptyangel]

Congratulations, you have just reached a whole new level of immense stupidity.

How much of an inbred twat do you have to be to reach it?

Oh wow, people on the internet amazes me.

[DeathInYourFace123]

there is this great new thing called reading i really think you sould try it!

[mynamebackwardsisbob]

The wheels, man! Lower the....aww too late LOL

[FRMarVFR]

fail.

[tigertankman]

roflmao

[DiaTind]

Who was driving that ?

[pieplicht]

nobody, it was nasa's RC toy plane,life size(not really their toy). just compare it with a crash test car.

[negativeeffect15]

Jesus...he is a shitty pilot

[bennmxer]

yeah but that still doesnt account for oxygen, what if the oxygen masks malfunction. doesnt account for impact and other reasons like heart attack or something

[pauchen58]

What better way to spend the taxpayers money?

[ns1112]

Tax payers money.....!! by doing this experiments they are trying to make air-travel safer. Thanks to them they have developed so much for planes ...thats the reason u fly fearless

[147ckjak]

it was to test a new" fire "proof" coating still a waste but it could hav esaved lifes

[jonkewen]

nasa should recycle!

[gamerzipo]

lool..NASA has space shutles and the most modern tecknology and all shit...and ere at Malta we have simple passenger planes and no planes have ever crashed

[8urnsy123]

that plane must of cost a fair bit

[smurfvolta]

It was an old one from the 60s.

[vivalaryan54]

i dont think it was an old plane because they were testing a new fireproof "coat" that goes around the body of the plane. in that fiery explosion none of the mannequins (used to represent people) were burned

[smurfvolta]

No, they were testing fuel additives that were supposed to make the fuel burn less on impact.

[Chao5bringer]

Well that failed horribly.

[Bennyboyage]

i was in that plane....in my nightmares

[TPrimaryS]

Yew . No one survived in there .

[journeystarr]

Because no one was in it, dumbshit.

[TPrimaryS]

Like I care about it ..... :)

[CplSYLUX]

who would voulunteer to fly it up then eject

[edwashere4]

no one ejected. There are two tell-tale signs. First there is no hole in the plane demostrating an ejection and, It was a controlled test. You don't make crash tests with someone ejecting.

[cowofthemonth]

I would, i a heartbeat

[elvemageownz123]

yup yup.. lets check the check-list.. no survivors.. check!.. demolished plane.. check!.. money wasted.. check!.. everything seems about right :o)

[DamienZshadow]

hey now, that crash test is what will help build better failsafe mechanisms for the next plane you board in case it comes crashing down.