Extended "Expelled" Trailer from FRC

[Walabio]

Richard Sternberg who bypasssed was punished. ¿How was he punished? He was not This movies bloodliable. This is the message of the movie:

Darwin > Atheism > Naziism > Genocide This is wrong at each Point: Most Christians except the evidence for biological evolution. So much for Darwin leading to Atheism. Hitler, the leader of Naziism, was a Catholic and a creationist. The Nazis committed genocide, but justified it with the works of Martin Luther and burned the books of Darwin.

[cr8383942]

The best part has to be when he's talking about an academic who purportedly lost his job for promoting ID. "This would not have been a problem in the days of Gallileo or Einstein, but unfortunately... this the era of Darwin..."

Besides the fact that last time I looked Einstein was post Darwin, the better part is the referring to the time of Gallileo as a time of greater tolerance, considering we all know what happened to him for, of all things, questioning church doctrine...

[heartforthelost]

Gravity is testable, Evolution is a theory good try :)

[2LegHumanist]

"Gravity is testable, Evolution is a theory good try :)"

You clearly don't understand what a scientific theory is. I love the way creationists basque in their ignorance.

[antonrainer13]

Just stand up and question GRAVITY, you'll find out how difficult that is!

[task2k]

MsLatosi: I respect your right to  be an ignorant uneducated moron. Look up the word religion in the dictionary, you might learn something USEFUL for a change.

[GetMeThere1]

MsLatosi,

Go to talkorigins dot org and you will find the "list of steves," a list of, now, 860 PhD. scientists who support evolution, and whose first name is "Steve" (or some variation of that)--a first name with approximately a 1% distribution in the population.

Your list of "700" is a TINY percentage of scientists, and examination of your list shows many with PhD's from bible colleges :)

[jamarrer]

Sorry to inturrupt here, but understanding both evolution and creationism is the best way to determine truth from theory. Most scientists haven't read the complete bible like most religious people haven't come to fully understand evolution. I have read Origin of Species and other books on evolution by the age of 14 and the entire bible at 15. Even though I was a hard-core evolutionist, I saw that the bible agrees more with the archeological evidence and creation than evolution.

[GetMeThere1]

jamarrer says: "I saw that the bible agrees more with the archeological evidence and creation than evolution."

Well, jamarrer, then you've "seen" something invisible to most objective observers. Archeological evidence shows many instances of human (and proto-human) habitation FAR, FAR earlier than the bible dates--in parts of the world that, apparently, the writers of the bible didn't even know existed.

[MsLatosi]

Here's a list of more than 700 Professors and Doctors from the most established Universities in the world who doubt Dawrinism.

(dissentfromdarwin(dot)org) Thousands more would love to sign, when they no longer fear being "Expelled". See Ben Stein's Movie.

[MsLatosi]

"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." ...Charles Darwin.

[task2k]

MsLatosi: Please, enlighten us. Show us the organ that cannot have formed by numerous, successive slight modifications. I'm sure you've done a lot of serious research on the topic.

[Impaler1815]

Why do we need to share anything? You seem to have more than enough money to open a 27 million dollar museum. That's more than enough to fund some proper research into creationism. How many scientists own their own evolutionist amusement park?

The fact that half the evolutionist scientists in America believe in God screws your last paragraph over.

[ikester7579]

How many evolution museums are there compared to ones that promote creation? And the fact that evolution is the exact opposite of creation makes people who believe in both deny God. And therfore will be judged for that.

[rockhardly]

Exactly how do you come to the conclusion that evolution is the exact opposite of creation? One is a theory of origins, one is a mechanism of change. They aren't even in the same category - much less opposites. Your comment is akin to saying a dog is the opposite of an organge - it makes no sense scientifically, theologically, or logically.

[jetmanisme]

If there was any evidence for I.D. and that evidence holds up to peer-review then science would have no choice but to accept it as a theory. When you have no evidence and try to circumvent the peer review process, that's when its really unfair.

[mbouw21]

I dont understand- if you take all the time to make this documentary wouldn't you at least learn a little bit about the philosophy of science first- like that science doesn't have anything to say about the existence of God? Of course many scientists are Athiests, but everyone is entitled to hold an opinion.

[MarkG45]

Man, if only we lived in the days of Galileo, where scientists and the religious were open minded about new ideas. I'm glad there was no, like, religious dogma that cited Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and 1 Chronicles 16:30 as reasons for why his heliocentric views were heresy. I'm glad they didn't lock him up, burn his writings, and ban any future writings. Oh wait, they did.

[TheFarcicalCourt]

We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his own facts, no ammount of propaganda will ever change that. ID is not rejected because its too radical or theres a conspiracy against it, ID is rejected because theres no evidence to support it. Saying ID and evolution are equally viable theories is like saying alchemy is a viable alternative science to chemistry.

[Cafeeine]

I am retaining my final opinion until I see this, but so far I am not impressed. What I see is fear-mongering with an underlying "since we are so persecuted, we must be true" conspiracy whiff.