Kenneth R Miller on the Creation Museum

[njs811271]

Open with a joke, talk until people stop listening. Win!

[MrJohnnyrace]

@njs811271 If hes using big words you dont understand then sorry. The museum isnt science. Its a theme park for the retarded.

[njs811271]

@MrJohnnyrace Oh? How many times have you been? I mean someone with a scientific brain like yours wouldn't form an answer to a hypothesis without first testing it. That is part of the scientific method correct? "Ask a question, background research, hypothesis, test hypothesis with an experiment, analyze, report results. So you are either giving an opinion, or your scientific method is backwards. Which one is it?

[MrJohnnyrace]

@njs811271 I agree with Dr. Miller. The research has been done.

[Craigmw45]

@njs811271 "I agree with Dr. Miller. The research has been done"

I'm restating MrJonnyrace's comment for the truth.

Its been 150 years, and no one has come up with anything better then evolution to explain the diversity of life. The creationist for as much noise as they are capable of making, can't even cite one paper supportive of their own position.

Contrast that to the theory of gravity. There are hundreds of real papers offering an challenge to the current theory yet the creationists have 0

[KCArmstrongXIIV]

@njs811271 u just got owned....lol!

[njs811271]

@KCArmstrongXIIV I like how people study very little of science and yet feel they know everything. By the way how many years does it take for one carbon atom to be removed from an object? This is square one in carbon dating.

[Craigmw45]

@njs811271 That isn't square one of carbon dating. That isn't even related. To someone who actually knows what it is, the physics behind it, and how to do it, your question is completely nonsensical.

People are saying your getting owned, because you seem to know nothing of the subject your posting about, yet your trying to speak as though your an authority.

[njs811271]

@Craigmw45 " yet your trying to speak as though your an authority." and who are you? Richard Dawkins?

[AceofDlamonds]

What the hell. The Creation Museum gives all xtians and ideologies a bad name. It's not based on science, so why fund it? My god you really think God would want you to fund with your church money some bullshit display to entertainment and "education"?

I dunno how it was funded, but if with church money, it's both theologically and intellectually unsound.

[Seekmosttoprophesy]

Did he say strata? ...without explaining where the strata came from?

Billions and billions of tons of sediments neatly accumulated one layer on top of the other without any disfiguring over millions of years?

It assumes the ground rose and fell in order to deposit each layer of sediment under water without affecting any of the previous layers.

Don't even try to suggest that.

[joonsoon2011]

@Seekmosttoprophesy

L2Plate tectonics....

[Quintinohthree]

@Seekmosttoprophesy

He's no geologist. There are geologists at your closest universe that can explain this to you. If you find out that what you present is correct then please let everyone know.

[gregrutz]

@Seekmosttoprophesy Not all sedimentary layers are from water, dummy.

[tragicallyhiprule]

They spent $27 million? no they wasted $27 million, how much does the church take in that they could drop $27 million? The church is a cash hog, tax them and we solve our national debt problems

[darkuser999]

Every scientist and everyone interested in science should visit the Creation Museum and have a good time! ;-)