This is like saying kevlar vests are dangerous because they make the person wearing it invincible to bullets. Its wrong on many levels.
How exactely is it that a nation defending itself makes it hostile? I would not have a problem with iran developing missle defense, I would mind them developing nuclear weapnos though... too late
you support the arming of iranians and oppose the defense of americans... thats anti-america... you all foolishly believed iran was peaceful now they have nukes.
Iran does not have nuclear weapons, and that's a fact of the IAEA and the US government.
The farthest Iran *ever* had with nuke development was during the Shah era.
Iran is a signatory of the NPT (Israel isn't, for example...) and deplores the use of WMD- they experienced it in the 1980s thanks to Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
Maybe you are thinking of N.Korea. N.Korea DEFINITELY has a nuclear arsenal and the means to destroy their two primary targets should the "West" get stupid- Seoul and Tokyo.
iran is devoloping nuclear weapons. aside from that why are people so hell bent on letting iran even have nuclear power when most of thost same people won't let us build new nuclear plants right here in america?
Most surveillance communities agree that the Iranian nuke program was shut down pre 1980. You probably didn't know it was us that started their nuclear program.
As much as I despise the previous Presidential admin. (Bush-43), both his dept.'s intel estimates AND the IAEA state there has been NO significant activity in the Iranian nuke program SINCE 2003.
We already fucked up with Iraq, okay? Let's not repeat it with Iran and get 800,000 fanatical soldiers rammed down our throats that have been receiving steady supplies of Chinese top-notch equipment since 1999 and has not been at war with anybody since 1988 or 1989 when Saddam's Iraq gave up.
I don't care what your stance on our Iraq War is, but it's FUCKING BOGUS is what the fact is.
That and if we attacked Iran, all Russia would have to do to help them is SAIL 600 KM ACROSS THE CASPIAN SEA.
Did anyone ever win a Nobel Peace prize for methods of universal annihilation? That's kind of how things work in the real world. You cannot win without stealing and death. It is like the Dick Cheney Peace Prize. Enough death, and peace will be the result. It's scientific!!
yep no ICBMs can reach north america... well, except about 2300 owned by russia and another 500 or so by india... and thats just the ones that are designed to reach us... they have many more...
Incorrect. Go to FAS (dot) org, click on "WMD Around the World" and read about China's nuclear arsenal.
Approximately, maybe, 50 or so ICBMs China has?
Not like the Chinese want us axed, anyway. We currently owe the Chinese over 5 trillion USD.
BTW- Body armor/aka Kevlar, does not make you invincible to bullets. You will still feel the horrible shock of the bullet striking you with all those massive kilojoules. I hear 7.62mm (AK/Soviet ammo) and 12-gauge solid slugs hurt like absolute hell.
In 1969 USA managed to launch first man on the moon by space shuttle. After that space shuttles were used to explore space and black holes etc were discovered. Then the earth was explored for hidden assets by space satellites. The next step was space war in which USA is still unable to thrive in the first stage. China has already destroyed its own satellite in space from the earth about 20 months back. Does that mean that now China must be accepted as the new Super Power on the globe?
Man I loved your video, it was amazingly clear, direct and with a peace message.
Nefariusi 1 year ago
This is like saying kevlar vests are dangerous because they make the person wearing it invincible to bullets. Its wrong on many levels.
How exactely is it that a nation defending itself makes it hostile? I would not have a problem with iran developing missle defense, I would mind them developing nuclear weapnos though... too late
you support the arming of iranians and oppose the defense of americans... thats anti-america... you all foolishly believed iran was peaceful now they have nukes.
gtq838 2 years ago
Iran does not have nuclear weapons, and that's a fact of the IAEA and the US government.
The farthest Iran *ever* had with nuke development was during the Shah era.
Iran is a signatory of the NPT (Israel isn't, for example...) and deplores the use of WMD- they experienced it in the 1980s thanks to Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
Maybe you are thinking of N.Korea. N.Korea DEFINITELY has a nuclear arsenal and the means to destroy their two primary targets should the "West" get stupid- Seoul and Tokyo.
Bledena 2 years ago
iran is devoloping nuclear weapons. aside from that why are people so hell bent on letting iran even have nuclear power when most of thost same people won't let us build new nuclear plants right here in america?
gtq838 2 years ago
"iran is devoloping nuclear weapons."
-And where, exactly, is your evidence?
Here's mine- w w w (dot) fas (dot) org / nuke
Click "Iran".
Most surveillance communities agree that the Iranian nuke program was shut down pre 1980. You probably didn't know it was us that started their nuclear program.
As much as I despise the previous Presidential admin. (Bush-43), both his dept.'s intel estimates AND the IAEA state there has been NO significant activity in the Iranian nuke program SINCE 2003.
Bledena 2 years ago
We already fucked up with Iraq, okay? Let's not repeat it with Iran and get 800,000 fanatical soldiers rammed down our throats that have been receiving steady supplies of Chinese top-notch equipment since 1999 and has not been at war with anybody since 1988 or 1989 when Saddam's Iraq gave up.
I don't care what your stance on our Iraq War is, but it's FUCKING BOGUS is what the fact is.
That and if we attacked Iran, all Russia would have to do to help them is SAIL 600 KM ACROSS THE CASPIAN SEA.
Bledena 2 years ago
VERY well said sir
TKTK00 2 years ago
Did anyone ever win a Nobel Peace prize for methods of universal annihilation? That's kind of how things work in the real world. You cannot win without stealing and death. It is like the Dick Cheney Peace Prize. Enough death, and peace will be the result. It's scientific!!
hypnofan35 3 years ago
You seem to operate under the assumption that winning the Nobel Peace Prize means something.
zoyclem 1 year ago
yep no ICBMs can reach north america... well, except about 2300 owned by russia and another 500 or so by india... and thats just the ones that are designed to reach us... they have many more...
gtq838 3 years ago
china has about twelve missles on us too
cheesecake092 2 years ago
Incorrect. Go to FAS (dot) org, click on "WMD Around the World" and read about China's nuclear arsenal.
Approximately, maybe, 50 or so ICBMs China has?
Not like the Chinese want us axed, anyway. We currently owe the Chinese over 5 trillion USD.
BTW- Body armor/aka Kevlar, does not make you invincible to bullets. You will still feel the horrible shock of the bullet striking you with all those massive kilojoules. I hear 7.62mm (AK/Soviet ammo) and 12-gauge solid slugs hurt like absolute hell.
Bledena 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1969 USA managed to launch first man on the moon by space shuttle. After that space shuttles were used to explore space and black holes etc were discovered. Then the earth was explored for hidden assets by space satellites. The next step was space war in which USA is still unable to thrive in the first stage. China has already destroyed its own satellite in space from the earth about 20 months back. Does that mean that now China must be accepted as the new Super Power on the globe?
yahoovisitor 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i like american ron was a good idea about SDI star wars program to hit and destroy all ussr russia suck waste missiles / rockets..
ussr russia is out of order and big loser russia country..
ron knew and told ussr russia is a still evil empire country in the world
bestamerica 3 years ago
i get it. but today its the foot print of an abrams!! lol.
McCain08
coleraine20 3 years ago
actually your right. in the 60's all the anti gov movement had marxist leaders. now there just older. same commies.
mccain08
coleraine20 3 years ago
Wooow impressive.
So tell me about this supply side Jesus.
jpbalkenende 3 years ago
Another ignorant Jesusfreak.
jpbalkenende 3 years ago
not military as in "war on terror"
but research on star wars
have you not read the title?
im not even talking about any war
thanks for the comment though
smilingtoasts 3 years ago
explain to me how cutting military funding in the middle of a war is a good idea, or safe for the troops.
YarthePirate 3 years ago
I wish Patton, Teddy Roosevelt, and Harry S. Truman were still alive. We would stop terrorism in its tracks!
ObiTrev 3 years ago
this one is brilliant
Gregaleg 3 years ago
well the honors went away.thats a big pile of gay
Warcrackforall 3 years ago
it got an honor. lol
Warcrackforall 4 years ago