I just got this monitor and it's amazing. Got it for $1500, factory ex-demo with 5 hours backlight hours only :D Definitely worth the cost. Hope the rest of you enjoy your shitty TN $200 panels. lol.
"It's not bleach-white, you can still see the detail"
Umm, I can see the detail HERE, on my standard 24-bit monitor, on the image after it, being on the LCD, was recorded by some camcoder... Marketing tricks.
@Elix17 I thought so to until I worked in DTP. Most monitors have their own ideas of what color and gamma is which is 'good enough' for most things. But monitors like this are calibrated so that what you see on screen is EXACTLY what you'd get if you printed it out. I was looking at this magazine on two monitors and I literally could not see some of the details on the cheaper 24bit monitor. You don't realize how crap most LCDs are until you compare them with high end displays.
100% non-affortable unless you're Bill Gates. I mean $2500?! That much for a display.. There are defenetly similiar displays on the market for a quater of that price.
I know its for pro's.. But cmon.. For 2000 you can get a really really really decent pc for photo editing and such. Maybe with a diplay too. For 500 you can get an awsome display for those doing that kind of work.
@MrNuun If you work for a large company (say Sony, Miramax, etc.) they are not going to leave a multi million dollar project in the "hands" of a 500 dollar monitor.
I have the feeling that this guy is not subjective. The way he says it every monitor is the best on his own Besides if you want colour use CRT. It's that simple. No professional who needs colour is going to use LCD.
that's true. CRT has better response time, better color but you face the consequences.. 1st of all it's big, 2nd it's power hungry, 3rd not really stylish, 4th it's old, 5th it's dangerous, anything it can explode infront of ur face.
LCD is far more affordable and ergonomic, not to mention that no one uses CRT monitors at home any more so the end result will be more consistent with LCD.
Most importantly, new technology integrated into LCDs - like this one - is outstripping CRTs of any qualitative advantages.
I think you should Check out the Samsung Syncmaster 2493hm... its 24" really nice specs and and most important for you is matte. Its not a lot of money either
well im not investing in this since it wont be practical for me.. but for those PROs that will be able 2 completely utilize this and have the budget for it.. its good i guess.. not only do u get superior colors (really hard 2 see in you tube, try typing TN vs IPS here, search for the vid).. but u get superior viewing angles as well :)
I mean, if you have the money for it, I'd definitely get it. Based on the ratings and reviews it seems like a good product, but also very expensive... Whats the price for it?
The reason of its price and quality is that it's an S-IPS panel. Your everyday LCD panel is a TN panel, good for general purpose and gaming but colors are more washed out, especially if you look at it from side angles. So yeah, you won't be buying this to play L4D.
When I bought my PC from Costco, the guy showed me the HP 24'' screen. He showed me that I can turn it around but I prefer the ViewSonic or Gateway one. Some screens are for people that like games, graphics, photos, etc.
What people don't get is that this monitor is mostly for professionals working in Photoshop. If you listen carefully, he says, "Color critical situations." Most monitors in class cost about the same and sometimes more.
I agree this is a waste of money for most people, and you could build a nice AMD PC, and get a good Monitor for it, and still have a good chunk of money left over, for things like everyday life stuff.
OMFG why do people need a huge monitor like that, just because it can display at a higher resolution and so called better colour when it can be viewed just as good on an older monitor
I think it's comical when people try to sell monitors and TVs over the internet or on a TV commercial. If the monitor I'm viewing the video on sucks, the monitor you're selling is going to look just as bad!
my jaw dropped when he turned the monitor to the side huge ass thing probably has it's own gravitational pull Jeezus!
if that damn thing fell on my hands while i was typing my new nickname would be stubbs...
lockoutpmp 5 months ago
this monitor has 1 billion color!
quakebox 10 months ago
Comment removed
quakebox 10 months ago
LP2480zx use a one-of-a-kind true 10-bit H-IPS panel (not 8-bit +AFRC like some of the other modern "10-bit" screens).
RoweroMacka 11 months ago
seems to be TFT technology returning back to CRT sizes :-)
BTW, I'm watching this right now on CRT 32bit and colors looks pretty amusing versus another 10bit matrix displays.
xrenube 11 months ago
@xrenube The video is only 8(24)bit though. So what you see is in no way a real representation of the product.
coldkick 1 month ago
You did not take those pictures. Newegg
CaptinoCasey 1 year ago
any one else see the how the video is fking up on the right side? maybe they should of used that screen to see if their video was right lol
u4eagun 1 year ago
i just have to disllike this, its old and ugly monitor, i would rather get a 3d led tv screen
kukubird92 1 year ago
You would probably be the first and last person to use your 3D LED TV for color critical applications...
dribsinep 1 year ago
@dribsinep why is that ?
kukubird92 1 year ago
That looks like Kim Kardashian's butt! Oh, THAT'S FAT!
merts487 1 year ago
LOL ... these worth 7 tn panel in price
r240j 1 year ago
Oh, for fuck's sake! It is NOT "literally one in a billion"! why do Americans never seem to understand what the word 'literally' denotes?
meaning1 1 year ago
I just got this monitor and it's amazing. Got it for $1500, factory ex-demo with 5 hours backlight hours only :D Definitely worth the cost. Hope the rest of you enjoy your shitty TN $200 panels. lol.
Davez621 1 year ago
"It's not bleach-white, you can still see the detail"
Umm, I can see the detail HERE, on my standard 24-bit monitor, on the image after it, being on the LCD, was recorded by some camcoder... Marketing tricks.
Elix17 1 year ago
@Elix17 I thought so to until I worked in DTP. Most monitors have their own ideas of what color and gamma is which is 'good enough' for most things. But monitors like this are calibrated so that what you see on screen is EXACTLY what you'd get if you printed it out. I was looking at this magazine on two monitors and I literally could not see some of the details on the cheaper 24bit monitor. You don't realize how crap most LCDs are until you compare them with high end displays.
Danny77uk 1 year ago
100% non-affortable unless you're Bill Gates. I mean $2500?! That much for a display.. There are defenetly similiar displays on the market for a quater of that price.
MrNuun 1 year ago
@MrNuun 1) its only 2000
2) this is not for gamers and kids, this is for professionals - photographers, film editors, etc.
3) 2 grand is not much if it is the main component of your professional work items.
Bulldog22031 1 year ago 2
I know its for pro's.. But cmon.. For 2000 you can get a really really really decent pc for photo editing and such. Maybe with a diplay too. For 500 you can get an awsome display for those doing that kind of work.
MrNuun 1 year ago
@MrNuun If you work for a large company (say Sony, Miramax, etc.) they are not going to leave a multi million dollar project in the "hands" of a 500 dollar monitor.
Bulldog22031 1 year ago
@MrNuun Not one that does true, print-calibrated color you can't.
Danny77uk 1 year ago
have a look at the syncmaster 2433.
telemetry9 2 years ago
its actually 10 bit color each of the 3 primaries get 10 bit
633336 2 years ago
RGB leds! = huge color gamut.
best thing next to Oled.
Ibringthetruth1 2 years ago
HP w2408h is better.
sitadriver 2 years ago
My monitor is better.
BigBoss7777777 2 years ago
I have the feeling that this guy is not subjective. The way he says it every monitor is the best on his own Besides if you want colour use CRT. It's that simple. No professional who needs colour is going to use LCD.
kotapaka 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheGreatStash1994 2 years ago
CRT? Really???
Dude stop living in the past......
TheGreatStash1994 2 years ago
Actually CRT monitors are still being made and it has been proven that a 22" 1600x1200 CRT has buch better colour than a 1600x1200 LCD
Daviddagr8 2 years ago
but my 25.5" monitor doesn't weigh 70 pounds...
TheGreatStash1994 2 years ago
yes, there is that but i suppse you won't move it much anyway
Daviddagr8 2 years ago
They still do take up a lot of room though and they hurt my eyes during prolonged use. They are still good, but are quickly becoming obsolete...
TheGreatStash1994 2 years ago
@Daviddagr8
that's true. CRT has better response time, better color but you face the consequences.. 1st of all it's big, 2nd it's power hungry, 3rd not really stylish, 4th it's old, 5th it's dangerous, anything it can explode infront of ur face.
clintdiamante99 2 years ago
@clintdiamante99 My 17" CRT thinks you're silly.
Douken 1 year ago
LCD is far more affordable and ergonomic, not to mention that no one uses CRT monitors at home any more so the end result will be more consistent with LCD.
Most importantly, new technology integrated into LCDs - like this one - is outstripping CRTs of any qualitative advantages.
m1ndz00 2 years ago
does it have aspect ratio control? =/
MultiFunseeker 2 years ago
does any1 have any recommendation for me?
i need a monitor between 22" - 24" (widescreen of course)
but the important thing (which makes it hard to find) is that the screen should be matte
x(
i have 4 windows in my room
normal screen is ok too
qhoa1385 2 years ago
I think you should Check out the Samsung Syncmaster 2493hm... its 24" really nice specs and and most important for you is matte. Its not a lot of money either
tranquiliz3r23 2 years ago
i adore it
UFOsportsJeroen 2 years ago
not just the monitor is amazing, but the price is amazing too^_^ $1999.98
Rikimaru915 2 years ago
whats with the edges?? it got cut off and theres 2 black strips on its left and right side.
entyceit 2 years ago
Its scaling the images.
durrthock 2 years ago
Also there is alot cheaper and (better monitor then this one) NEC2490 is the best monitor
in the world in price range of 2000/2500 dollars
and it cost only 1000$ amaizing piece of technology!!
26psyside 2 years ago
Most users dont understand that the most imporant part of the pc is THE MONITOR
you look at it all the time the power of
VGA means almost nothing w/o good monitor
you wont get any of the extras of high end
graphic cards/pc ask me with T240 such
waste of money bad colors loss of details
input lag, ghosting, bad viewing angles !!!!
HORROR!
26psyside 2 years ago
i have HP and hp is the best monitor for clear screen and colour
merdian 2 years ago 2
"A billion... with a B!"
farshidw3 2 years ago
no its a billion with a z =="
styXv3ngeance 2 years ago
no, billion with double D's. (. )( .)
krayzgerman 2 years ago
I cann only say: Samsung syncmaster 1200NF CRT :> Cheaper and probably bether
slomarik 2 years ago
should i get it for gaming?
enyownz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he says "color space" like some kinda mexican
Samdamana 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he does lol
kickdoeent 2 years ago
I was just thinking that while I was watching : )
Ketou 2 years ago
i think ill get this one
tweaker9999 2 years ago
The colors didn't look like anything special..
Maybe it's just YouTube..
yomith 2 years ago
lol not just YouTube itd be your own screen
wax333 2 years ago
I suppose so.
But they still don't seem like something to invest all that money into -.O
yomith 2 years ago
well im not investing in this since it wont be practical for me.. but for those PROs that will be able 2 completely utilize this and have the budget for it.. its good i guess.. not only do u get superior colors (really hard 2 see in you tube, try typing TN vs IPS here, search for the vid).. but u get superior viewing angles as well :)
tuberoako777 2 years ago
Yeah :)
I mean, if you have the money for it, I'd definitely get it. Based on the ratings and reviews it seems like a good product, but also very expensive... Whats the price for it?
yomith 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TIGER DIRECT SUCKSSSSSHAHAHAHAH FAGGOTS THE presentor is a gay lord of the fuycher
AmericansSexualPreds 2 years ago
says the pedofile with no life
DoraStalker 2 years ago 4
The reason of its price and quality is that it's an S-IPS panel. Your everyday LCD panel is a TN panel, good for general purpose and gaming but colors are more washed out, especially if you look at it from side angles. So yeah, you won't be buying this to play L4D.
ccricers 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I got a better one then that monitor: Samsung 24" HDTV, 1080p full HD.
xDEADLOCKEDx2468 2 years ago
When I bought my PC from Costco, the guy showed me the HP 24'' screen. He showed me that I can turn it around but I prefer the ViewSonic or Gateway one. Some screens are for people that like games, graphics, photos, etc.
essentialeugene 2 years ago
my sister thinks alberts cute
so do i ; )
moutaz 2 years ago
fuck hp
PacMang69 2 years ago
DELL on mind!
TheArea510 2 years ago
Dell is way better at making monitors.
SukhoiSu37Terminator 2 years ago
LMAo dell dont make LCD they just have there name stamped on the product... someone else just makes it for them.
zergdog 2 years ago 22
@zergdog this is also true with tvs they mostly have the same screen
MrChris0123 1 year ago
What people don't get is that this monitor is mostly for professionals working in Photoshop. If you listen carefully, he says, "Color critical situations." Most monitors in class cost about the same and sometimes more.
skylineaddict 2 years ago 10
Haha, the thing is $2,000
cril1001001 2 years ago 2
such a waste of money, could get 2, 40inch lcd's with that
Uploadvidz 2 years ago
I agree this is a waste of money for most people, and you could build a nice AMD PC, and get a good Monitor for it, and still have a good chunk of money left over, for things like everyday life stuff.
clays121 2 years ago
Agreed
illage2 2 years ago
Albert, have you and Bauer received an email from OJ Simpson's attorney?
P.S. I think you should review the LG W3000H-BN
sof2finchy 2 years ago
u need to come back to tech up date !
Chipsuss 2 years ago
Damn that's sexy. Thanks guys.
playa1313 2 years ago
that bitch is bad ass
LETHLSS 2 years ago
some body messed up, i saw this yesterday, and it got reloaded again today?, some one has to keep track of there vids
pcandcargeek28 2 years ago
Yeah it was not wide screen so the video was stretched up
PrinyDood 2 years ago
i can allready imagine myself playing Warhead on that monitor :)
lorenzo1234567891011 2 years ago
:) :) :) ! ALBERT ! :) :) :)
GCVos 2 years ago 4
for proffesionals
randy106 2 years ago
I may be loosing it but was'nt this uploaded teh other day?
guns102 2 years ago 2
that's true i saw it uploaded yesterday wtf
silviurs 2 years ago
$2000...thats kind of much for a monitor
vipor29 2 years ago
thats a fat monitor lol I would get that if i was doing pictures and photoshop
15eman 2 years ago
It sounded cool at first cause in the description they called it affordable. I go to tigerdirect and it's $2,599.99 CA... meh
LuckyNibb 2 years ago 4
I want that screen, amazing specs, but it's kinda slow, but i c why, because its mindblowing insane!
KapteinFruit 2 years ago
i read somewhere that a true "millions colors" LCD would be slower (above 8ms) response time.
so if someone selling you a 16million-colors monitor with 2ms response time, it's probably bogus.
agungk 2 years ago
most response times are measured from G2G so its irrelevant either way no matter what they post.
TheBlitz1 2 years ago
repost
JBRISTA 2 years ago
Sounds nice, but also very expensive :(
m66k 2 years ago
OMFG why do people need a huge monitor like that, just because it can display at a higher resolution and so called better colour when it can be viewed just as good on an older monitor
illage2 2 years ago
actually some people do need it, people who have a lot of windows open while working :P
magzire 2 years ago
I've got a 24" screen. Several reasons:
1) Much more comfortable picture
2) Biiiig screen allows me to do more multi-tasking
3) Allows my to blow up my pics without having to zoom in to much
4) I can hook up my PS3 to it so i don't need a TV to watch my blu-rays or play games.
yitih 2 years ago
Because its good for photo/video editing. If youve used photoshop/adobe premier youll understand
brianchris4 2 years ago
No I don't understand, because I don't use Photoshop
illage2 2 years ago
you can have all your editing controls spread out more allowing the picture you have open for editing to be bigger its less cramped
brianchris4 2 years ago
Right, i see
illage2 2 years ago
the question is, why wouldn't you need 64 times more color combination and 24" of pleasure?
jkpb015 2 years ago
Why would;t you need one, well if you have a colour monitor then you don't need one
illage2 2 years ago
Very nice video, enjoying the demonstration of the product as usual. Keep it up. :)
inkofdeath230 2 years ago
they re-upload it ?
enyceckk101 2 years ago
I think it's comical when people try to sell monitors and TVs over the internet or on a TV commercial. If the monitor I'm viewing the video on sucks, the monitor you're selling is going to look just as bad!
skyroket 2 years ago
LOL
Quinctius 2 years ago
why did you upload this video 2 times
lorikzzz 2 years ago
other video the aspect ratio was fuxed, it turned out 4:3 instead of 16:9.
LaGgY42o 2 years ago
welcome back albert !!!!!!!
specialformula14 2 years ago
ninja!
GotEmSkills 2 years ago
great video
st0necld 2 years ago