You are still avoiding the question . The ONLY possible position you can take is the Church somehow lost its authority ? Even though Jesus said he won't The Catholics were underground till EDICT OF MILAN do you really belive they had a Bible ? No ? So how could they know what they knew ? Willing to die ? This whole video is foolish . Of course Catholicism came before the Bible if not how could they infallibly know how the Holy Bible should be ?
@SAYYOURROSARY The fundamental misunderstanding here is the Catholic view of the concept of 'church'. At absolutely NO POINT in scripture does this phantom authorotative teaching authority appear, with the exception of the apostles themselves. No hint of succession or further 'refinement' of the simple revealed truths can be found anywhere. Jesus never said the 'church' as you understand it would prevail. Remember, He said the words He spoke would judge us, not the 'vicars' he supposedly left .
That's because the church exsisted 397 years BEFORE the Bible was compiled .under one cover , This is the classic which came first .. The church predates the Bible
by 397 years Your altered Bibles started after 1500's But Jesus said he would never leave His church
Catholics always believed in the Trinity but the pope approved it as dogma .
Nowhere in the Bible does it say Jesus from the father and the Holy ghost is sent by BOTH Father and Son . Why do you believe this ? Dogma
Language is always a matter of usage, but that reality routinely eludes the attention of the incompetents who purported to instruct the vast majority of Alexandrian cultists in Greek and Hebrew as well as misleading them with idle speculation.
None of them or any other skeptic has ever presented one historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, as many scholarly works have demonstrated long ago.
@jjpetkusiii "Peace on Earth goodwill towards men" The real quote is "Peace on earth towards men of goodwill " see the difference ? No wonder you think YOU are "saved" ..it's like the way Luther changed the Bible to fit his beliefs .... sound familiar ?
Popish ideologues, atheist activists, and crypto-Romanist apologists have opposed any and every Biblical authority, but no Buddhist, Moslem, Vatican cultist, Scientologist, Darwinist or Opus Dei flagellant can tell you how to know with certainty that you will go to heaven when you die.
Neither religion, nor Alexandrian cultism, nor skepticism has ever saved anyone. Only Jesus saves.
@SAYYOURROSARY The endlessly offensive statement that the 'church produced the Bible' flies in the face of scripture which states that holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
@catholicexodus and WHO decided which scriptures were valid and which were spurious ? WHO put it in the order they did ? You know the answer . THJE ONLY valid protestant angle to take is that the Church lost it's authority" To act like everybody was not Catholic all along is offensive and flies in the face of history bro . BTW Chapter and verses were a new addition to the Bible
The LORD Who gave the Holy Bible by inspiration also preserved it.
As RainhadoCanto4 wrote, "Here [are] the 'revisions' to the King James Bible:
"1. 1612: Typography ( from Gothic to Roman type).
"2. 1629 & 1638: Correction of typographical errors.
"3. 1762 & 1769: Standardization of spelling.
"The 'Board of Managers' of the American Bible Society in 1852 determined that 'The English Bible as left by the translators has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text...'"
@jumbaljoe We have lots of them as customers. Do whatever you like. I will however, see if you have violated any You Tube policies by posting this. They (my customers) all know where I stand. My literature is freely displayed and distributed in my business. Has been for years.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Are you really a simpleton?
History 101, Events happen first, books follow and document events.
As to Church structure not being in the bible I guess you are missing 1Corinthians 12:28?
"And in the church God has appointed first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, also those having gifts of healing, those able to help others, those with gifts of administration, and those speaking in different kinds of tongues."
Exactly jjpet you troll videos posting your archiac diatribe that the Vatican is the AntiChrist, yet when summoned to give an account of your ministry, you always wiggle your way off the hook by hurling attacks
Are you too old to learn a new trick?
You forget there are those Christians who are saved yet so by fire. I agree that the Catholic church is in err with its dogma, but atleast they stand on the fact that Christ is the son of God
This is by definition the very thing AntiChrist denies
If you want me to respond to you posts or even to be aware of their existence, you should address them to me. I am not so naive that I suppose that you were unaware of that procedure, but mistaken remarks like yours can be posted for any number of reasons.
"For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ. And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ" (1Cor 2:16ff).
@jjpetkusiii There are denomintations of Christianity out there that share as much in the definition of cultism as Catholicism, Mormonism, the JWs, I used to utterly hate Pentecostalism and its heresies. Lets add Calvanism and its limited atonement to that. If we spend all of our time attacking other Christian denominations for their lack of understanding, or maybe our own, that leaves an open field for the Accuser to run wild
The equivalency of ancient texts which are not part of the Holy Bible with the Scriptures themselves is a constant theme in Papist dogma, spewed from the Vatican and its predecessors (e.g., the Lateran Palace), which shifts with the ease of quicksand in lockstep with the papacy's economic and political agenda.
Pagan Rome morphed into the Papal Curia from Constantine's reign onward, and the current Caesar-Pope Idol Shepherd, Benedict XVI, succeeded Nero and Caligula, not Peter.
@jjpetkusiii There are things about the Baptist faith that I do not care for. Baptism never saved anyone.... well maybe the Jews under Peters message in Acts 2 but it never saved a Gentile anywhere in scripture. I am sure if you got to know the Brethern faith and its strictness to the adherance of the Word you would find it almost legalistic. THERE ARE PROBLEMS IN EVERY DENOMINATION! Are we not merely different fingers of the same hand?
@jjpetkusiii I do not care for the teachings of Pentecostalism. I think it damages the image of Christianity to the unbelievers out there. I dont think a JW is a Christian. I question the faith of a Calvanist who believes he was chosen, did he really approach Christ sincerely? I dont know.
I do know what the biblical definition of an AntiChrist is tho, and I do know that written on every holy place in Islam is the words, "God has no son" It is the first pillar of Islam.
Salvation is of the LORD by grace through faith in the Son of God alone.
Conversely, Pontifex Maximus Benedictus XVI, a former member of the Hitler Jugend, trots around the international corridors of power in a tailored white house dress.
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. (Deuteronomy 22:5).
@jjpetkusiii A Catholic is not going to behead you for refusing to worship the Pope. No one is going to buy the fact that the Pope is Messiah. The bible is clear enough with its English that the AntiChrist will be known by the midst of the week and that he will rise from the area of southern Lebanon/Syria.
As Providential 1611 wrote, "Catholicism…LITERALLY cut off men heads, limbs, tongues, babies out of pregnant women, etc. Rome hates the King James Bible because it is OF GOD and exposes Rome for the cult it is. The Bible teaches us not to walk with heretics anyway, but to expose, mark, note and shun them. What you view as cultic and sectarian is simply Biblical obedience to be separate from idolaters, greedy people and peddlers of another Gospel."
Do you know what the name of Ahmadinejad means in English? It translates to English as "The son of God" Im not saying this man is the Assyrian, but I will say this, if you do not worship his way, "Shi'ite" he will put you to death. Read the news. 70 people in the last 3 weeks for religious reasons. I dont see the Pope doing that, do you.
Islam has its own end time prophecy, and I am sure if you were to study it, your view of AntiChrist would change forever.
No, he is not "the Assyrian" because he is Persian, just like his name, "Rabbi." Similarly, your trivia laughably posing as an exegesis is as phony as a Gentile pretending that he is an Old Testament Israelite who understands the Holy Scriptures.
@jjpetkusiii Like I said before, you are a vile man who ca do nothing but hurl unsubstantiated attacks at other Christians. Your biggest problem is that you believe deep in your heart the only saved of Christ are those who are Baptist with a capital "B"
You are an old dog who is unable to learn a new trick. You are a sad and a pathetic Christian who has placed his own self in a position where he believes he can judge other Christians
Deal with the beam in your eye and your lack of love
Maybe Pliny and the Imperial court of the Caesars got their information from a cannibal who wanted to have a mass and passed it on to you.
What the Holy Bible makes clear is that the Lord Jesus Christ is the "Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." That is what the Apostles preached, and it is Scripturally consistent with the words of the Son of God at a Passover meal before His precious blood was shed for my sins. "Transubstantiation" stinks of pagan cannibalism.
@jjpetkusiii Al Yassou3 Rabbi translates to English as Jesus is Lord. Thank you for exposing your lack of understanding with your attack on my username. Childish at best. I use this account to debate and educate Muslims on the difference between Christianity and Islam. My username is Arabic.
Why dont you go teach your hatred in a Ruckman church, "Baptist". Ruckman for most of his ministry was a Jew hater and the bible is very clear concerning that heresy, isnt it
Why don't you learn valid hermeneutic methodology and sound Biblical doctrine?
By the way, Peter Ruckman is famous for his opposition to Antisemitsm, but he doesn't pretend to be a Canadian who pretends to be an Arab pretending to know what the Holy Scriptures mean.
@jjpetkusiii Dont preach to the chior, my parents went to a Ruckmanite church. I was saved in the Baptist faith. You will not tell me nothing that I have not seen nor heard in the past.
I am Canadian, born of French/Irish/Danish ancestory. My wife was born Arabic Sunni Muslim. You are a Ruckmanite at heart, that is obvious.
Why dont you try being a good soldier of Jesus Christ and try wetting your sword on something other then Christian Saints for a change. Stupid bigot
It is therefore no wonder that your empty rhetoric is so confused, but your presumptuous, false, and baseless assertions that I am a "Ruckmanite at heart" and a "Stupid bigot" demonstrate beyond a shadow of doubt that you and your idle posts lend new meaning to the term "pompous buffoon."
The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not aware of them" (Luke 11:44).
@jjpetkusiii Tell me, what does it feel like to live in a house that is divided?
You cant spot the common enemy because you are too busy attacking your own allies.
You are an idiot, and this is the third time that I have admonished you for attacking Christians and referring to them as AntiChrist
Acts 13:10And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?
Unlike the slanderous contempo cultists, pompous Alexandrian ideologues, existentialist rhetoricians, and deluded of the ungodly and popish revisionist ilk manifestly given over to sophistry and vain deceit, the linguistic geniuses and world-class prodigies who translated the Old and New Testaments into the exemplary English of the King James Bible were masters of their native tongue as well as Greek and Hebrew.
No factual error in the text of the AV1611 has ever been proven.
Unlike you, I do not attempt to supplant the authority of the Holy Scriptures with blatant private interpretations, nor am I a pavonine eisegete and Vatican propagandist.
@jjpetkusiii If you want to expose the heresy in the Catholic church, or any other denomination of Christianity, go for it. I'll end this by stating, nothing is worse then seeing a Christian claim that another Christian is the AntiChrist. The RCC is not the harlot of Rev 17. It does not fit. Do a word study on Harlot.
Islam fits. Islamic Eschatology fits. Shia Theocracy fits. Catholicism does not. Catholicism is a heretical institute that should be exposed for what it is, heresy.
@jjpetkusiii Gentlemen, please! By this flame war you are (unwittingly) adding fuel to the hell-spawned fire of Catholicism's absurd claim to be 'one' and 'united', while we have 30,000 denominations constantly bickering. I've never yet considered disabling comments (since the whole point of making a video, in my mind, is to spark discussions) but...I enjoy these back-and-forths between Catholic and Protestant but I'm not sure this is going anywhere. Sorry. Love you both.
@catholicexodus I am not Catholic brother. I am a fundamentalist protestant. it just bugs when one Christian refers to another Christian as AntiChrist. No one is going to argue there is an abundance of heresy in the Catholic church which needs to be exposed but I am sure there are people in there who have accepted and acknowledged the saving grace of the cross.
@AlYassou3Rabbi I know you're not; I remember your fine posts that have been appearing for some time now. That's why I was concerned about the 'infighting' . God bless.
@AlYassou3Rabbi Gentlemen, please! By this flame war you are (unwittingly) adding fuel to the hell-spawned fire of Catholicism's absurd claim to be 'one' and 'united', while we have 30,000 denominations constantly bickering. I've never yet considered disabling comments (since the whole point of making a video, in my mind, is to spark discussions) but...I enjoy these back-and-forths between Catholic and Protestant but I'm not sure this is going anywhere. Sorry. Love you both.
6The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes; 7Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre; 8Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah. 9Do unto them as unto the Midianites; as to Sisera, as to Jabin, at the brook of Kison: 10Which perished at Endor: they became as dung for the earth.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
31This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee; and the form thereof was terrible. 32This image's head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass, 33His legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay. 34Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces.
Your aversion or inability to perceive the Biblical truth does not constitute an error in anyone else's exegesis. The Lord Jesus Christ said, "He that believeth on Him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God" (John 3:18). As an elementary matter of logic and common sense, an offense against your Eternal Creator, the Lord God, warrants everlasting damnation.
Wow,i see all the usual suspects commenting here,small world we live in.Thanks to Joe"jjpetkusiii" for sending me this and many others and setting me on the path to accepting the 1611 KJV as the true and correct Bible version.And thanks to Helga"RainhadoCanto4"for her friendship,which really means alot to me,even when everyone else rejects me.I know Helga,i am going to bring up the Chick Publications again.But in 1980 a christian gave me Dr.Alberto Rivera's "Alberto"series that opened my eyes.
@walkingdead7 I used to be pretty skeptical about Chick stuff (though I know they have been effective...the 'lake of fire' scenes have haunted some people to the point of repentance) but I had lunch with David W. Daniels one day, Chick's main researcher, and I gotta tell ya, the guy's for real. I have pretty good confidence in his research and I recommend his 'Babylon Religion' book on my website.
The already held PAGAN beliefs, indeed! As that is what Catholicism is, a melange of pagan beliefs!
What do you know! I have reached 1337 favorite videos, which is the maximum amount allowed and I cannot favorite any more! Just what I have time for doing: going through all my favorites to see which I may dump! Oh! well! I shall do it!
@RainhadoCanto4 Isn't it wonderful that there are so many faithful brothers and sisters out here fighting the good fight? I used to mock You Tube as just another time waster for people with no lives. Then I checked it out and found that the whole white-for-the-harvest mission field that is the world is right at our fingertips. Atheists think we hate science! I love it, it brings the world close to hear the truth, if they will receive it. God Bless!
Oh!Were it not for YouTube, I have no doubt, I would have NEVER heard about the King James Bible!
For 10 years I roamed about, from church to church, NEVER feeling I was "fed," and lo and behold, THROUGH YOUTUBE I learned about the TRUE word of God, and came to make some of the very best friendships, CHRISTIAN FRIENDSHIPS, I will ever have, beginning with BereanBeacon and his wife who first told me about the King James Bible!
AWESOME, INDEED, how God works things out for us!
@jjpetkusiii I'm no fan of catholicism , but you have also heard of the cult Islam have you not ? They deny the Father the Son and replace the comforter with a vile man named mohammad . They deny the crucifiction the resurrection and the very propitiation for our and their sins. Their Dome of the rock sitting on the holy temple mount has the very inscription on it written " God has no son " etc. Convert a muslim my brother and let the catholic dead bury their own dead.
@jjpetkusiii The bible is a self contained book of prophecy. Why dont you post the verses, chapters or books here for us to support your view that the RCC is the whore of Babylon. You can not.
You can apply one passage of scripture to the RCC but I can apply that scripture to Islam along with most of the other verses concerning end times prophecy.
You can like it, or you can argue it, but it does not take away from the fact that you have to deny scripture to make your assumption.
Try using a dictionary after you receive extensive remedial education in elementary logic and basic reading comprehension from someone who is literate in English.
@jjpetkusiii And yet again, no verses, chapters or books to support your view.
Why not? In all those years of studying scripture, you must have come up with atleast one more passage to support your own personal interpretation. Come on, just one, and I will be satisfied.
My bible teacher always told me, the bible always supports its own argument with numerous passages, and he proved this view each time he was questioned, so come on, make full proof of your ministry !!
You're a barrel of laughs once again although I can present the Holy Scriptures for your admonition herewith. "As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby" (1Peter 2:22).
"But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man" (1Corinthians 2:14ff).
You fail exegesis, by the way, but no error, addition, or omission to the Scriptural text of the Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (KJV) has ever been proven.
The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again" (John 3:7).
Obviously, the accuracy of the Holy Bible and a sort of empiricism--tres manque, in your case--are extremely significant to you, but when were you born again?
@jjpetkusiii Do you ever stay on topic, or is that something you are capable of?
10And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. 11And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
Prove the RCC in that passage. Like the commentator states, you can make scripture say anything you want if you believe it. You believe it, so prove it.
Your obscurantism (may or) may not appeal to anyone except other eisegetic bunglers and conceited ideologues like you, but the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, verbally inerrant in English.
Unlike you, I have nothing to apologize for: "The thought of foolishness is sin: and the scorner is an abomination to men" (Prov. 24:9).
"Forsake the foolish, and live; and go in the way of understanding" (Prov. 9:6).
@jjpetkusiii And yet you are still incapable of one coherent passage to support your assumption. Hmm, always personal attacks. What spirit are you filled with actually? 12And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. 13These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. 14These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them
"A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this" (Psalms 92:6)
Try reading something besides the works of Talmudic ideologues who substitute their existententialism for valid hermeneutic methodology and sound Biblical doctrine, neither of which are matters of debate.
@jjpetkusiii Try posting a verse or two to support your lunacy that the RCC is the mother of harlots. All I see from you is the same diatribe you have used on countless videos. Do you have this stuff saved so you can mearly copy and paste it? Again, refrain from the personal attacks and post atleast one verse to substantiate your premis.
@jjpetkusiii 1Cor 13:11When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
Its time for you to put away these childish notions of yours. The world has changed. Why dont you try changing with it? No one with an ounce of sense would consider the Vatican being the AntiChrist anymore, with what is going on in the Middle East currently.
@jjpetkusiii Where is your sound biblical doctrine to prove your stance. You keep making the assertion I am the one who is in error, so post your verses to support your argument.
2 Timothy 4:5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.
@jjpetkusiii You dont need to admonish me, I am aware of what the scriptures state. What you need to do, and have failed to do everytime we have had a discourse on this subject is offer the verses to prove that the bible is stating what you assume it is.
You are the one who requires admonishment. When I was a babe in the word, I felt as you did that the RCC was the harlot of Rev 17 but as the scriptures state, when I was a child, I thought in childish ways.
"Understand, ye brutish among the people: and ye fools, when will ye be wise?" (Psalm 94:8).
"The LORD knoweth the thoughts of man, that they are vanity" (Psalm 94:11).
1Ti 1:5 ¶ Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned: From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling (1Timothy 1:5ff)
While your confused hermeneutics and empty rhethoric obviously speak for themselves, no one is ever obliged to answer your foolish and unlearned questions, but thanks for asking anyway!
@mutabrev I was recently turned on to a Muslim website (by a Muslim). They are using so-called apologetics, science, etc. just like Christians. They even have a 'Jesus Test' to deceive the minds of the simple. I refuted it s founder Yusuf Estes in two videos about the Jesus Test. Thank God for his WORD which protects us from deception. I even called him on that Muhammad 'comforter' thing.
You are still avoiding the question . The ONLY possible position you can take is the Church somehow lost its authority ? Even though Jesus said he won't The Catholics were underground till EDICT OF MILAN do you really belive they had a Bible ? No ? So how could they know what they knew ? Willing to die ? This whole video is foolish . Of course Catholicism came before the Bible if not how could they infallibly know how the Holy Bible should be ?
SAYYOURROSARY 1 year ago
@SAYYOURROSARY The fundamental misunderstanding here is the Catholic view of the concept of 'church'. At absolutely NO POINT in scripture does this phantom authorotative teaching authority appear, with the exception of the apostles themselves. No hint of succession or further 'refinement' of the simple revealed truths can be found anywhere. Jesus never said the 'church' as you understand it would prevail. Remember, He said the words He spoke would judge us, not the 'vicars' he supposedly left .
catholicexodus 1 year ago
That's because the church exsisted 397 years BEFORE the Bible was compiled .under one cover , This is the classic which came first .. The church predates the Bible
by 397 years Your altered Bibles started after 1500's But Jesus said he would never leave His church
Catholics always believed in the Trinity but the pope approved it as dogma .
Nowhere in the Bible does it say Jesus from the father and the Holy ghost is sent by BOTH Father and Son . Why do you believe this ? Dogma
SAYYOURROSARY 1 year ago
@SAYYOURROSARY
Language is always a matter of usage, but that reality routinely eludes the attention of the incompetents who purported to instruct the vast majority of Alexandrian cultists in Greek and Hebrew as well as misleading them with idle speculation.
None of them or any other skeptic has ever presented one historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, as many scholarly works have demonstrated long ago.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii "Peace on Earth goodwill towards men" The real quote is "Peace on earth towards men of goodwill " see the difference ? No wonder you think YOU are "saved" ..it's like the way Luther changed the Bible to fit his beliefs .... sound familiar ?
SAYYOURROSARY 1 year ago
@SAYYOURROSARY
Thank you for your prompt reply.
Popish ideologues, atheist activists, and crypto-Romanist apologists have opposed any and every Biblical authority, but no Buddhist, Moslem, Vatican cultist, Scientologist, Darwinist or Opus Dei flagellant can tell you how to know with certainty that you will go to heaven when you die.
Neither religion, nor Alexandrian cultism, nor skepticism has ever saved anyone. Only Jesus saves.
When--if ever--were you born again??
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@SAYYOURROSARY The endlessly offensive statement that the 'church produced the Bible' flies in the face of scripture which states that holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
catholicexodus 1 year ago
@catholicexodus and WHO decided which scriptures were valid and which were spurious ? WHO put it in the order they did ? You know the answer . THJE ONLY valid protestant angle to take is that the Church lost it's authority" To act like everybody was not Catholic all along is offensive and flies in the face of history bro . BTW Chapter and verses were a new addition to the Bible
SAYYOURROSARY 1 year ago
@SAYYOURROSARY
The LORD Who gave the Holy Bible by inspiration also preserved it.
As RainhadoCanto4 wrote, "Here [are] the 'revisions' to the King James Bible:
"1. 1612: Typography ( from Gothic to Roman type).
"2. 1629 & 1638: Correction of typographical errors.
"3. 1762 & 1769: Standardization of spelling.
"The 'Board of Managers' of the American Bible Society in 1852 determined that 'The English Bible as left by the translators has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text...'"
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Its all public record, be my guest.
jumbaljoe 1 year ago
@jumbaljoe We have lots of them as customers. Do whatever you like. I will however, see if you have violated any You Tube policies by posting this. They (my customers) all know where I stand. My literature is freely displayed and distributed in my business. Has been for years.
catholicexodus 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Are you really a simpleton?
History 101, Events happen first, books follow and document events.
As to Church structure not being in the bible I guess you are missing 1Corinthians 12:28?
"And in the church God has appointed first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, also those having gifts of healing, those able to help others, those with gifts of administration, and those speaking in different kinds of tongues."
Why is there a structure of authority?
jumbaljoe 1 year ago
Exactly jjpet you troll videos posting your archiac diatribe that the Vatican is the AntiChrist, yet when summoned to give an account of your ministry, you always wiggle your way off the hook by hurling attacks
Are you too old to learn a new trick?
You forget there are those Christians who are saved yet so by fire. I agree that the Catholic church is in err with its dogma, but atleast they stand on the fact that Christ is the son of God
This is by definition the very thing AntiChrist denies
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
If you want me to respond to you posts or even to be aware of their existence, you should address them to me. I am not so naive that I suppose that you were unaware of that procedure, but mistaken remarks like yours can be posted for any number of reasons.
"For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ. And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ" (1Cor 2:16ff).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii There are denomintations of Christianity out there that share as much in the definition of cultism as Catholicism, Mormonism, the JWs, I used to utterly hate Pentecostalism and its heresies. Lets add Calvanism and its limited atonement to that. If we spend all of our time attacking other Christian denominations for their lack of understanding, or maybe our own, that leaves an open field for the Accuser to run wild
Christians of other faiths are not our enemies
cont
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
The equivalency of ancient texts which are not part of the Holy Bible with the Scriptures themselves is a constant theme in Papist dogma, spewed from the Vatican and its predecessors (e.g., the Lateran Palace), which shifts with the ease of quicksand in lockstep with the papacy's economic and political agenda.
Pagan Rome morphed into the Papal Curia from Constantine's reign onward, and the current Caesar-Pope Idol Shepherd, Benedict XVI, succeeded Nero and Caligula, not Peter.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii There are things about the Baptist faith that I do not care for. Baptism never saved anyone.... well maybe the Jews under Peters message in Acts 2 but it never saved a Gentile anywhere in scripture. I am sure if you got to know the Brethern faith and its strictness to the adherance of the Word you would find it almost legalistic. THERE ARE PROBLEMS IN EVERY DENOMINATION! Are we not merely different fingers of the same hand?
cont
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii I do not care for the teachings of Pentecostalism. I think it damages the image of Christianity to the unbelievers out there. I dont think a JW is a Christian. I question the faith of a Calvanist who believes he was chosen, did he really approach Christ sincerely? I dont know.
I do know what the biblical definition of an AntiChrist is tho, and I do know that written on every holy place in Islam is the words, "God has no son" It is the first pillar of Islam.
cont
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
You clearly miss the point
Salvation is of the LORD by grace through faith in the Son of God alone.
Conversely, Pontifex Maximus Benedictus XVI, a former member of the Hitler Jugend, trots around the international corridors of power in a tailored white house dress.
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. (Deuteronomy 22:5).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii A Catholic is not going to behead you for refusing to worship the Pope. No one is going to buy the fact that the Pope is Messiah. The bible is clear enough with its English that the AntiChrist will be known by the midst of the week and that he will rise from the area of southern Lebanon/Syria.
cont
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
As Providential 1611 wrote, "Catholicism…LITERALLY cut off men heads, limbs, tongues, babies out of pregnant women, etc. Rome hates the King James Bible because it is OF GOD and exposes Rome for the cult it is. The Bible teaches us not to walk with heretics anyway, but to expose, mark, note and shun them. What you view as cultic and sectarian is simply Biblical obedience to be separate from idolaters, greedy people and peddlers of another Gospel."
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii
Do you know what the name of Ahmadinejad means in English? It translates to English as "The son of God" Im not saying this man is the Assyrian, but I will say this, if you do not worship his way, "Shi'ite" he will put you to death. Read the news. 70 people in the last 3 weeks for religious reasons. I dont see the Pope doing that, do you.
Islam has its own end time prophecy, and I am sure if you were to study it, your view of AntiChrist would change forever.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
No, he is not "the Assyrian" because he is Persian, just like his name, "Rabbi." Similarly, your trivia laughably posing as an exegesis is as phony as a Gentile pretending that he is an Old Testament Israelite who understands the Holy Scriptures.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Like I said before, you are a vile man who ca do nothing but hurl unsubstantiated attacks at other Christians. Your biggest problem is that you believe deep in your heart the only saved of Christ are those who are Baptist with a capital "B"
You are an old dog who is unable to learn a new trick. You are a sad and a pathetic Christian who has placed his own self in a position where he believes he can judge other Christians
Deal with the beam in your eye and your lack of love
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
Maybe Pliny and the Imperial court of the Caesars got their information from a cannibal who wanted to have a mass and passed it on to you.
What the Holy Bible makes clear is that the Lord Jesus Christ is the "Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." That is what the Apostles preached, and it is Scripturally consistent with the words of the Son of God at a Passover meal before His precious blood was shed for my sins. "Transubstantiation" stinks of pagan cannibalism.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Al Yassou3 Rabbi translates to English as Jesus is Lord. Thank you for exposing your lack of understanding with your attack on my username. Childish at best. I use this account to debate and educate Muslims on the difference between Christianity and Islam. My username is Arabic.
Why dont you go teach your hatred in a Ruckman church, "Baptist". Ruckman for most of his ministry was a Jew hater and the bible is very clear concerning that heresy, isnt it
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
Why don't you learn valid hermeneutic methodology and sound Biblical doctrine?
By the way, Peter Ruckman is famous for his opposition to Antisemitsm, but he doesn't pretend to be a Canadian who pretends to be an Arab pretending to know what the Holy Scriptures mean.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Dont preach to the chior, my parents went to a Ruckmanite church. I was saved in the Baptist faith. You will not tell me nothing that I have not seen nor heard in the past.
I am Canadian, born of French/Irish/Danish ancestory. My wife was born Arabic Sunni Muslim. You are a Ruckmanite at heart, that is obvious.
Why dont you try being a good soldier of Jesus Christ and try wetting your sword on something other then Christian Saints for a change. Stupid bigot
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
It is therefore no wonder that your empty rhetoric is so confused, but your presumptuous, false, and baseless assertions that I am a "Ruckmanite at heart" and a "Stupid bigot" demonstrate beyond a shadow of doubt that you and your idle posts lend new meaning to the term "pompous buffoon."
The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not aware of them" (Luke 11:44).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Tell me, what does it feel like to live in a house that is divided?
You cant spot the common enemy because you are too busy attacking your own allies.
You are an idiot, and this is the third time that I have admonished you for attacking Christians and referring to them as AntiChrist
Acts 13:10And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?
Titus 3:10 !!
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi No, not at all.
Unlike the slanderous contempo cultists, pompous Alexandrian ideologues, existentialist rhetoricians, and deluded of the ungodly and popish revisionist ilk manifestly given over to sophistry and vain deceit, the linguistic geniuses and world-class prodigies who translated the Old and New Testaments into the exemplary English of the King James Bible were masters of their native tongue as well as Greek and Hebrew.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Your last post has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. I am KJVonly bigot. Again you are preaching to the choir.
Abviously you have been pricked in your cold little heart.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
No factual error in the text of the AV1611 has ever been proven.
Unlike you, I do not attempt to supplant the authority of the Holy Scriptures with blatant private interpretations, nor am I a pavonine eisegete and Vatican propagandist.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii If you want to expose the heresy in the Catholic church, or any other denomination of Christianity, go for it. I'll end this by stating, nothing is worse then seeing a Christian claim that another Christian is the AntiChrist. The RCC is not the harlot of Rev 17. It does not fit. Do a word study on Harlot.
Islam fits. Islamic Eschatology fits. Shia Theocracy fits. Catholicism does not. Catholicism is a heretical institute that should be exposed for what it is, heresy.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
Your twisted eisegeses clearly suit you very well.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Gentlemen, please! By this flame war you are (unwittingly) adding fuel to the hell-spawned fire of Catholicism's absurd claim to be 'one' and 'united', while we have 30,000 denominations constantly bickering. I've never yet considered disabling comments (since the whole point of making a video, in my mind, is to spark discussions) but...I enjoy these back-and-forths between Catholic and Protestant but I'm not sure this is going anywhere. Sorry. Love you both.
catholicexodus 1 year ago
@catholicexodus
As usual, Brother Dave, your godly counsel is excellent and timely.
God speed!
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@catholicexodus I am not Catholic brother. I am a fundamentalist protestant. it just bugs when one Christian refers to another Christian as AntiChrist. No one is going to argue there is an abundance of heresy in the Catholic church which needs to be exposed but I am sure there are people in there who have accepted and acknowledged the saving grace of the cross.
Jesus is Lord
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi I know you're not; I remember your fine posts that have been appearing for some time now. That's why I was concerned about the 'infighting' . God bless.
catholicexodus 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi Gentlemen, please! By this flame war you are (unwittingly) adding fuel to the hell-spawned fire of Catholicism's absurd claim to be 'one' and 'united', while we have 30,000 denominations constantly bickering. I've never yet considered disabling comments (since the whole point of making a video, in my mind, is to spark discussions) but...I enjoy these back-and-forths between Catholic and Protestant but I'm not sure this is going anywhere. Sorry. Love you both.
catholicexodus 1 year ago
6The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes; 7Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre; 8Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah. 9Do unto them as unto the Midianites; as to Sisera, as to Jabin, at the brook of Kison: 10Which perished at Endor: they became as dung for the earth.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
31This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee; and the form thereof was terrible. 32This image's head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass, 33His legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay. 34Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces.
Where is the RCC mentioned in those passages?
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlYassou3Rabbi
Your aversion or inability to perceive the Biblical truth does not constitute an error in anyone else's exegesis. The Lord Jesus Christ said, "He that believeth on Him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God" (John 3:18). As an elementary matter of logic and common sense, an offense against your Eternal Creator, the Lord God, warrants everlasting damnation.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This is called an a-priori assumption. It’s also called eisegesis as opposed to exegesis.
Eisegesis is reading INTO the text what you want to find and exegesis is to let the Bible declare for itself what it says.
For the root of exegesis see John 1:18. DECLARE. Strong's 1834.
IDH77 1 year ago
Amen and amen!
edwardpf123 1 year ago
Wow,i see all the usual suspects commenting here,small world we live in.Thanks to Joe"jjpetkusiii" for sending me this and many others and setting me on the path to accepting the 1611 KJV as the true and correct Bible version.And thanks to Helga"RainhadoCanto4"for her friendship,which really means alot to me,even when everyone else rejects me.I know Helga,i am going to bring up the Chick Publications again.But in 1980 a christian gave me Dr.Alberto Rivera's "Alberto"series that opened my eyes.
walkingdead7 1 year ago
@walkingdead7 I used to be pretty skeptical about Chick stuff (though I know they have been effective...the 'lake of fire' scenes have haunted some people to the point of repentance) but I had lunch with David W. Daniels one day, Chick's main researcher, and I gotta tell ya, the guy's for real. I have pretty good confidence in his research and I recommend his 'Babylon Religion' book on my website.
catholicexodus 1 year ago
The Key to Catholicism is pedophilia
bvindh 1 year ago
The already held PAGAN beliefs, indeed! As that is what Catholicism is, a melange of pagan beliefs!
What do you know! I have reached 1337 favorite videos, which is the maximum amount allowed and I cannot favorite any more! Just what I have time for doing: going through all my favorites to see which I may dump! Oh! well! I shall do it!
RainhadoCanto4 1 year ago
@RainhadoCanto4 Isn't it wonderful that there are so many faithful brothers and sisters out here fighting the good fight? I used to mock You Tube as just another time waster for people with no lives. Then I checked it out and found that the whole white-for-the-harvest mission field that is the world is right at our fingertips. Atheists think we hate science! I love it, it brings the world close to hear the truth, if they will receive it. God Bless!
catholicexodus 1 year ago
@catholicexodus
Oh!Were it not for YouTube, I have no doubt, I would have NEVER heard about the King James Bible!
For 10 years I roamed about, from church to church, NEVER feeling I was "fed," and lo and behold, THROUGH YOUTUBE I learned about the TRUE word of God, and came to make some of the very best friendships, CHRISTIAN FRIENDSHIPS, I will ever have, beginning with BereanBeacon and his wife who first told me about the King James Bible!
AWESOME, INDEED, how God works things out for us!
RainhadoCanto4 1 year ago
Amen and amen, Brother.
No cult on this planet is bigger or deadlier to the soul that modern jesuitical Catholicism based in Vatican City.
God speed!
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii I'm no fan of catholicism , but you have also heard of the cult Islam have you not ? They deny the Father the Son and replace the comforter with a vile man named mohammad . They deny the crucifiction the resurrection and the very propitiation for our and their sins. Their Dome of the rock sitting on the holy temple mount has the very inscription on it written " God has no son " etc. Convert a muslim my brother and let the catholic dead bury their own dead.
mutabrev 1 year ago
@mutabrev
Thank you for your thoughtful reply, but Rome is the great whore and Mother of Harlots and Abominations according to the Holy Scriptures.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii The bible is a self contained book of prophecy. Why dont you post the verses, chapters or books here for us to support your view that the RCC is the whore of Babylon. You can not.
You can apply one passage of scripture to the RCC but I can apply that scripture to Islam along with most of the other verses concerning end times prophecy.
You can like it, or you can argue it, but it does not take away from the fact that you have to deny scripture to make your assumption.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
Thanks for your reply devoid of a vaild premise,
Try using a dictionary after you receive extensive remedial education in elementary logic and basic reading comprehension from someone who is literate in English.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii And yet again, no verses, chapters or books to support your view.
Why not? In all those years of studying scripture, you must have come up with atleast one more passage to support your own personal interpretation. Come on, just one, and I will be satisfied.
My bible teacher always told me, the bible always supports its own argument with numerous passages, and he proved this view each time he was questioned, so come on, make full proof of your ministry !!
Verse?
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
You're a barrel of laughs once again although I can present the Holy Scriptures for your admonition herewith. "As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby" (1Peter 2:22).
"But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man" (1Corinthians 2:14ff).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Like I said before.. post the verses to prove your point, and yet again you fail.
You are pretty handy at personal attacks yet not so handy at rightly dividing scripture.
One last time, show me a verse that disproves Revelation 17 is not referencing Daniel 2.
Proverbs 14:3In the mouth of the foolish is a rod of pride: but the lips of the wise shall preserve them.
It might be an occasion for you to deal with your own vanity and pride.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
You fail exegesis, by the way, but no error, addition, or omission to the Scriptural text of the Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (KJV) has ever been proven.
The Lord Jesus Christ said, "Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again" (John 3:7).
Obviously, the accuracy of the Holy Bible and a sort of empiricism--tres manque, in your case--are extremely significant to you, but when were you born again?
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Do you ever stay on topic, or is that something you are capable of?
10And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. 11And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
Prove the RCC in that passage. Like the commentator states, you can make scripture say anything you want if you believe it. You believe it, so prove it.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
Your obscurantism (may or) may not appeal to anyone except other eisegetic bunglers and conceited ideologues like you, but the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, verbally inerrant in English.
Unlike you, I have nothing to apologize for: "The thought of foolishness is sin: and the scorner is an abomination to men" (Prov. 24:9).
"Forsake the foolish, and live; and go in the way of understanding" (Prov. 9:6).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii And yet you are still incapable of one coherent passage to support your assumption. Hmm, always personal attacks. What spirit are you filled with actually? 12And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. 13These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. 14These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
"A brutish man knoweth not; neither doth a fool understand this" (Psalms 92:6)
Try reading something besides the works of Talmudic ideologues who substitute their existententialism for valid hermeneutic methodology and sound Biblical doctrine, neither of which are matters of debate.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Try posting a verse or two to support your lunacy that the RCC is the mother of harlots. All I see from you is the same diatribe you have used on countless videos. Do you have this stuff saved so you can mearly copy and paste it? Again, refrain from the personal attacks and post atleast one verse to substantiate your premis.
I am still waiting.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
Well, maybe that is why you mark replies to your convoluted posts as spam.
I'm really not interested in reading your irrational eisegeses, however, let alone publicizing your pavonine wresting of the Holy Scriptures.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii 1Cor 13:11When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
Its time for you to put away these childish notions of yours. The world has changed. Why dont you try changing with it? No one with an ounce of sense would consider the Vatican being the AntiChrist anymore, with what is going on in the Middle East currently.
You are either hard hearted or blind.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi No, not at all.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Where is your sound biblical doctrine to prove your stance. You keep making the assertion I am the one who is in error, so post your verses to support your argument.
2 Timothy 4:5 But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.
Im waiting for proof of your ministry.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
You got it backwards from the start in your idiosyncratic way, and I already admonished you.
So, how long have you been a hoser?
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii You dont need to admonish me, I am aware of what the scriptures state. What you need to do, and have failed to do everytime we have had a discourse on this subject is offer the verses to prove that the bible is stating what you assume it is.
You are the one who requires admonishment. When I was a babe in the word, I felt as you did that the RCC was the harlot of Rev 17 but as the scriptures state, when I was a child, I thought in childish ways.
Its time for you to grow up
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
"Understand, ye brutish among the people: and ye fools, when will ye be wise?" (Psalm 94:8).
"The LORD knoweth the thoughts of man, that they are vanity" (Psalm 94:11).
1Ti 1:5 ¶ Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned: From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling (1Timothy 1:5ff)
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Again these verses state nothing concerning the RCC being the AntiChrist
Your posts are generally vile in nature. What type of human being are you anyways?
Even Lucifer spouts scripture. Where are the chapter and verse markings to support your view?
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago
@AlYassou3Rabbi
While your confused hermeneutics and empty rhethoric obviously speak for themselves, no one is ever obliged to answer your foolish and unlearned questions, but thanks for asking anyway!
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@mutabrev I was recently turned on to a Muslim website (by a Muslim). They are using so-called apologetics, science, etc. just like Christians. They even have a 'Jesus Test' to deceive the minds of the simple. I refuted it s founder Yusuf Estes in two videos about the Jesus Test. Thank God for his WORD which protects us from deception. I even called him on that Muhammad 'comforter' thing.
catholicexodus 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@mutabrev Amen. There is your beast of scriptures. Islam.
AlYassou3Rabbi 1 year ago