Added: 2 years ago
From: Oswald777
Views: 2,162
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow, I want one person to give me a good reason why Sara Palin should be POTUS, besides "She stand for freedom" or "She is a true conservative." This is meaningless rhetoric and she is obviously not a true conservative.

    Just one good tidbit of policy that she supports or does not support, besides health care, because I believe her supporters oppose health care for because her pundits tell them to do so.

    How is being Pro Life and Pro War at the same time even possible?

    Come on...Anyone???

  • OK! She wants to develop energy sources in the USA to wean us off of foreign oil. Two policies she supports come to mind. 1. She wants to drill in ANWR. 2. She wants to build the Alaskan Natural Gas Pipeline.

    OK? Now stop being so demanding and confrontational. We are all Americans! Let's try to get along!

  • Thank you. While these are not her original ideas that are not bad ones to support. Energy independence is a necessity for a free country.

    Although drilling for more oil is hardly a way to gain long term energy independence because this is still a non renewable energy, correct?

    A non-interventionist foreign policy, ending corporate government collusion, and promulgating a true free market would undoubtedly lead to a more independent country far swifter than drilling in a wildlife reserve.

  • "ANWR is a 2,000-acre plot that's in the midst of 21 million acres." * "It is an absolutely barren, permanently frozen, remote sliver of land that requires a minimal drilling footprint, and its development parameters are equivalent to the size of L.A.'s airport." **

    * Page 273, ** Page 274 "Going Rogue" by Sarah Palin

  • ANWR Cont.

    Americans needed to know how uncoconscionable it is that anti-development radicals use ANWR as their fund-raising poster child. They use bogus photoshopped pictures showing mountains and waterfalls and lush forests with Bambi prancing to and fro. That is all fake and these fund-raisers know it." - Pages 273 & 274 "Going Rogue" by Sarah Palin

  • ANWR Cont. #2

    Why are you calling it a wildlife reserve? I understand that is its official designation but it sounds pretty expendable to me. Not much wildlife going on there according to Sarah Palin who has actually visited there. Especially if it saves American lives from Mid East Gulf War, Oil Wars. What say you?

  • Well for starters Palin is lying, ANWR is the largest refuge in the entire country. over 45000 sq miles. It contains more plant and wildlife than any other place in the arctic circle. Secondly the point is moot about drilling there, I do not know why neocons continue to push for it. The fact is that we have plenty of oil in places where we currently drill. However it is very hard to fight this globalization and foreign war oil that the corporatists so diligently strive for.

  • Drilling will never happen there, this has been going on for some 30 years and nothing has come of it. It is a talking point of the neocon rhetoric. Energy independence is a great way to get people to support you. That is why both sides of this 2 party dictatorship push for. The phony right with drilling in ANWR and the phony left with cap and trade. All the while Shell and Exxon support both cap and trade AND drilling there. If people could only see that there is no such thing as left and right

  • we would be much better off. There is no left and right, only corporate state ties. You seem very intelligent and rational. I would recommend reading a book that is not lies and neocon propaganda. Try this out, END THE FED by Ron Paul or The Creature from Jekyll Island, by G.Edward Griffin. Both portray the actual reality of what is really going on, and are not based in this left/right paradigm, like the media and anyone who is featured in the media, ie Sara Palin. I appreciate this exchange.

  • Savyfide,

    We are closer than you think we are. You like Ron Paul for some very good reasons. I love his ideas of getting rid of the IRS etc. However, Paul is not electable. Palin IS! They both speak the truth to power and they both are true patriots who love this country unlike the current administration. I love to see Ron Paul on the Palin Ticket as VP!!! It won't ever happen but I'd take him over Romney, Giuliani, and maybe Gingrich, I'd rather see a Palin / Huckabee ticket the most.

  • Awe this is cute stuff lololo

  • Behold Sara the next POTUS! Run you leftist commie scum. Haahahahahahaa

  • This video makes me want to stab myself. repeatedly.

  • Please do by all means!

  • The liberals are absolutely terrified of this woman!

  • What would Palin do in the White House? What has she done to prove that she deserves your vote? OK - she's cute in the glasses and all, but look behind the facade: listen to what she tries to say. What is there about her argument that reflects any kind of thought?

    She couldn't even handle being the governor of a state for the entirety of her term. How does her leaving the office of governor prove her worthy for being President?

  • You honest to God can not be that Stupid! Seriously I'm making a rule... no more 12 year olds are allowed to comment on this page!!!

  • You make fun of me, but you don't answer one of the questions I ask.

  • I have answered your two questions! Do not reply with BS or I will block you from this site.

  • OK, against my better judgment Ill answer your questions, if you reply with BS, you'll be blocked on my site!1st. Veto this moronic healthcare reform bill! 2nd Not bow to Special Interests Groups (Same Sex marriage)(Illegal Immigration)(Pro-Abortion)! 3rd. Make a clear decision on the troops, (Obamas own appointee), General McChrystal, the US commander in Afghanistan requested!

    4th. Restore respect for the office by not bowing to foreign leaders.

    5th. Veto Cap and Trade

    6th. Drill in ANWR

  • Define a Special Interest Group. NRA? Right-To-Lifers? Rush? Focus on the Family? Militias? Christian Coalition? So there are SIGs all over the political spectrum; if you want to demonize one, you have to demonize them all

    Why are we in Afghanistan? No foreign country EVER wins there. Wouldn't it be better to get our people out, save lives (US and Afghan), reduce PTSD, damage to families, etc.?

    I hardly think SPs getting into office will 'restore respect'. Look what happened during Ws 8 years.

  • Rush is not a SIG they are a band from Canada! LOL! We also agree here...OK get us out of Afganistan, or get us completely in! just stop the indecision. That is how we look weak and more people die. But if we leave and OBL & Taliban continue to train there, our children will have to pay in blood someday. Are you ready to accept that?

  • Rush (the one with Geddy Lee) ROCKS! The other Rush...well, not so much...

    Here's to continued reasonable exchange of ideas! And Canadian Rush!

  • If you are so against special interests groups, why doesn't the auto industry count as a special interest group? Why isn't this country's marriage to fossil fuels challenged? Read Bob Herbert in NYT on plant in Detroit that makes solar panels using innovative tech. Why don't we get behind green technology as a means of job creation and revenue development rather than running back to the auto makers and their calls to "Drill, baby! Drill"?

  • I agree with you but I say "both/and" Let's drill our own and at the same time work on greening. Not just go green and shoot ourselves in the foot.

  • Everybody knows that "global warming" or "manmade climate change" is a huge hoax brought on by the UN and touted by Al Gore. DRILL BABY DRILL and stick your solar panel where the SUN DON'T SHINE! FOOL

  • I'm not aware of any "pro-abortion" group. There is a pro-CHOICE group. "Choice" is the key word. Pro-abortion by definition would mean that ALL babies should be aborted.

    On the other hand, pro-life is really "anti-choice". If you were truly pro-life, you wouldn't have voted for the war. Your anti-gay marriage bias is rooted in your religion. We have separation of church and state in the constitution for a reason. Accept the fact that some civil RIGHTS laws won't follow your bible.

  • Smartcooki,

    Nice try! The only reason to insist on having a choice is to be allowed to choose to kill your baby. There is no need to "choose" to let the baby be born once it is conceived don't be a dumbass or I will banish you from my page. Laws can be wrong as I'm sure you know it was LEGAL to own slaves in this country but it was never Moral or right!

  • You're proving my point. Christians justified slavery in the same way they justify bigotry against gays and anti-choice views when it comes to abortion. It's not any of your business what a woman does with her own body.

    Ban me.. Who gives a shit? Just proves that you have no valid arguments, so you'd rather hide your tail and run.

  • I have no problem with what a woman does to her own body. If she chooses to have sexual relations with a man and conceives another human being, that other human being now has rights and a body no matter how small. I have a problem with a woman choosing what to do with that other human being's body.

  • Reply to smatcooki part 2

    Don't get me wrong. MEN and our problems with seeing women as objects for our sexual gratification; that is the root of this evil. Still the mother who chooses to end her child's life is not without blame as well. God help us all. I'll only ban you if you take cheap shots. If continue to dialogue, keep it civil.

  • Obviously you "give a shit" or you would not be on my site making comments. I believe all people want to be good. To argue against life goes against your own heart. You WANT to be convinced that you are wrong because you know it in your heart already.

  • There is nothing good about the taking of an innocent life. You can not see a baby in the womb as an enemy who somehow deserves to die. There is no attack on the mother or her body. Only a dependant relationship which God (or for you maybe Nature?) put there. It is the way of life. You know that in your brain and in your heart. You can not make a valid argument against that. If the Mother does nothing to stop the birth, in 9 months it will happen. That is the way it is. Bottom Line!

  • No one is advocating killing anyone. The issue has always been that your religious right's definition of when the fetus is considered a human being is different from what everyone else's definition. Pro-CHOICE advocates put the life of an already existing human being BEFORE anything else.

    Also, your proposition that the woman CHOSE to get pregnant is ridiculous. Women who CHOOSE to get pregnant are not the ones getting abortions. Religious are in part to blame for many unwanted pregnancies.

  • The last time I checked Science said that the baby was "Human" as soon as the chromosomes of the sperm and the egg combine and start to divide into two cells. Science says it is human. That is not the DNA of a tomato plant growing in there. A new and different human being is alive at that point. And I did not say the mother chooses to become pregnant. I said she chooses to have sexual relationships. Many thing go against human nature. We are not animals and we can control our urges!

  • Obviously, these "controls" of human natures don't work very well, do they? Abstinence, prohibition, etc. All proven to be useless when put into practice.

    Science doesn't say anything like that. A human being is a human being when it can function on its own. If it is attached to someone and it's the only way they can exist, it's just a part of that other human being. If you're so pro-life, then you should be for forcing someone to donate their kidney to save another life by the same notion.

  • Methinks you're wrong. Check with any high school biology book. It's human and it is living. By your definition Steven Hawkings would not be human. You are judging by the quality of a life not by the intrinsic value God gives to all living human beings. Abstinence does work. I never heard of anyone who got pregnant without having sex. Excluding in vitro! & The BVM too.

  • You didn't answer my question. Should you be allowed to force someone to give up one of their kidneys to save another person's life?

    Abstinence does work - in theory. In practice, it's useless. Human nature wins and thus it doesn't work.

    There is no god, except in your mind, so it can't give anyone anything.

  • Each person should have the right to life that is in the preamble of our constitution. Each has free will to choose if they wish to aid another by giving a kidney away.

    There is a God and He loves you enough to put up with your obstinacy. Otherwise there would not even be a wisp of smoke where you once were.

    Merry Christmas!

  • Your god is some joker considering all the attrocities going on in the world. I'm sure you can come up with lots of good reasons for genocides and wars.

    Each person has free will to decide what to do with a PART of their body. You are right. This includes cells that are not yet humans.

  • The best reason for genocides and wars is the fallen nature of man. If we turned to God we would not be so evil so often. God didn't cause the strife you speak of, we did!

    2nd. The newly conceived person is not a "part" of the mother. They have a completely separate DNA among other things. And they are human. To say otherwise is to fly ignorance in the face of known science. The DNA is not a tomato plant. The baby is human no matter how small!

  • If your god is so powerful and well-meaning, why would he be killing all those people? It makes no sense. If there was a god, life wouldn't have these attrocities. Period. You credit good things to god and bad things to man. You should be crediting BOTH to man. There is no logical explanation for an existance of a god who only does good things 50% of the time. It's called randomness, like flipping a coin. 50% of the time it's one result, 50% of the time it's another.

  • Religious right are the ones prohibiting the use of birth control and promotin abstinence (which goes against human nature and obviously doesn't work).

  • Answering your second question:

    She had Trig. She didn't have to but she did. She did not buy the usual crap about the quality of life for a downs syndrome child and abort him. That is putting her money where her mouth is! I respect personal sacrifice over personal gain!

  • Who suggests Downs Syndrome babies should be aborted? I've worked with lots of DS youth and adults in Special Olympics? Who calls for their abortion?

  • I'm very happy to hear that. Seriously! God bless you. We are not that different at all!

  • GO PEJLIN!

  • This rocks! Sarah Palin was great! We will support her in 2012. She will win! it is her's if she wants it!

  • I went an got my copy signed! Best day of my life. I love you, Sarah!!

  • I love this. I was at Meijer in Ft. Wayne and just like this video, everyone - thousands of folks - united and had a wonderful time sharing with one another. Usually with crowds like that, there are security issues, etc. But she has such a gift to bring the best out in folks. Thanks again for posting this!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more