I wasn't saying give a stupid argument I can debunk, I was saying PUT IT SIMPLY. You rattled on for 7 minutes about a very simple argument because it IS a stupid argument, dressed up with flashy language. Here's your argument in a nutshell.
1. We perceive order in the universe for which we are not the cause.
2. if we are not the cause, then there must be a being of sufficient creative prowess to create the universe with said order intact. This is the argument from improbability. too easy.
You did not understand the video at all as seen by your paralleling it with TAG. Its not TAG and its not the argument from reason. I am not talking of logic as a category at all, its an argument centering around normative ethics and rationality and then inferring God as the BEST of all explanations. This response was simply an insult, its your way of saying "Next time give a stupid argument that I can debunk".
Why in Gods name would you think I try to bully people by using big words? What big words did I use? Honestly, I am perplexed beyond belief by this response. I have 30+ people who responded with the same language, same argumentative style, and had some good objections. Why not attack their videos as well?
you need a new screen name ....the whole RRS thing doesn't seem to work :)
TogetherForPeace 2 years ago
I wasn't saying give a stupid argument I can debunk, I was saying PUT IT SIMPLY. You rattled on for 7 minutes about a very simple argument because it IS a stupid argument, dressed up with flashy language. Here's your argument in a nutshell.
1. We perceive order in the universe for which we are not the cause.
2. if we are not the cause, then there must be a being of sufficient creative prowess to create the universe with said order intact. This is the argument from improbability. too easy.
un0RRS 2 years ago
You did not understand the video at all as seen by your paralleling it with TAG. Its not TAG and its not the argument from reason. I am not talking of logic as a category at all, its an argument centering around normative ethics and rationality and then inferring God as the BEST of all explanations. This response was simply an insult, its your way of saying "Next time give a stupid argument that I can debunk".
Veritas48 2 years ago
Why in Gods name would you think I try to bully people by using big words? What big words did I use? Honestly, I am perplexed beyond belief by this response. I have 30+ people who responded with the same language, same argumentative style, and had some good objections. Why not attack their videos as well?
Veritas48 2 years ago