Nuclear technology is safe, it's the humans that aren't. Nuclear technology is designed to handle problems, not human intervention. All nuclear accidents to date (save Fuku) have been caused by human error, the technology in itself is perfectly sound. I am not afraid of nuclear power, I'm afraid of the humans that use it.
Well, I wouldn't want radioactive waste in my backyard either; it seems to me that if nuclear power were truly safe, where we put the waste wouldn't matter. And if it's not safe, maybe we should reconsider nuclear power until we can find an answer to this.
I realize that, but I can't see how we can divorce the waste products from the technology itself. I've read that some companies actually excavate shallow ditches, then line them and fill them with water, then place the hot fuel rods in there. If the water evaporates for any reason, the rods will expel dangerous contaminants to the immediate area and beyond. That seems remarkably dangerous, not to mention toxic to the water table.
There are ways of disposing of nuclear wastes. You can look at the processes used in countries with a closed fuel cycle, such as France. Nuclear wastes are recycled : the remaining uranium and plutonium are used again in the power plants, the metal part are compressed and put in special containers, and the fission product and minor actinides (the most radioactive wastes) are vitrified.
Vitrification is basically a process where the wastes are transformed into glass. To be more precise, fission products and minor actinides atoms are confined within a glass matrix (they are not surrounded by glass, they are part of the glass structure). This process is very technical (a lot of research has been developed to achieve it), but vitrified wastes are very stable. They resist very well to alteration or self irradiation.
Would sure like to see this movie,but every body has to piss around and tell you to go here or go here or go here or go here.Enough already ,show the f---in movie or shut the f--- up!
Well, it's not coming back up a Fukushima. there are 3 complete core meltdowns. and that's only what the liars at Tepco are admitting to now. Research the truth. It will set you free.
@IExposeMormonism Far more people die in coal mines than in nuclear disasters. An unstoppable coal mine fire in Pennsylvania is causing pollution, road damage and sinkholes to this day after burning for many years. The only US deaths from nuclear incidents happened in 1961. Nearly 100 times that many died in coal mines in the US in that same year. More people die mining coal in China in a single year than died in all of Chernobyl's fallout.
@Kohdok You're wrong. Millions have died from cancer at Chernobyl. and so it will be at Fuku.. This has only just begun. your coal mining comparisons are absurd. You must be a Tepco collusionist. Stay in your bondage of lies, or research and find out what's Really going on at Fuku and and what's still going on around Chernobyl today. Neither ended after the explosions, that's when it begins and it goes on for decades.
@IExposeMormonism Excuse me... "Millions"? Not even Greenpeace made an estimate that high. Not even in that ballpark. Nuclear power gives off radioactivity only when there's a problem, coal power plants put out radioactivity, as well as mercury and soot, as part of SOP. I think you need to do some research and actually make an educated response next time.
@Kohdok Your wrong. Greenpeace is a front organization for the folks that own them. Don't expect to hear much from them on Fukushima, there one attempt to test the water is BS.Many other have already done it. You're the most stupid commenter I've seen on nuclear issues. And Many experts have said Millions have and will die from Chernobyl. The radiation numbers at 20 miles out from Fuku are higher than Chernobyl and millions will die over the years. You're being lied to and are liar yourself
@Kohdok No wonder your so ignorant, your lost in video games. And your 24? Stay off my pages, I've blocked you. Go get an education. Your lost in a TV set reality
@IExposeMormonism So...you're basically saying I've won? Because the only way you can end the argument is by running away? I guess you did the five seconds of Google research that proved you wrong but don't want to admit it. Real cute.
By the way, stop speaking in Caps Lock on your page. It makes you look insane.
@Kohdok You're a teenage retard. Go play your childish video games and leave the serious issues to people that can see. Calling you a retard and moron is an insult to retards and morons.
@IExposeMormonism You know, I used to think the same things about nuclear power that you do. Then I read about BP-level oil spills happening all the time in the middle east, mine collapses and air pollution from coal, dams displacing millions of people, "fracking" for natural gas, earthquakes caused by Geothermal and the lack of viability of wind and solar power due to moody weather.
Considering the alternatives, I'll take the million-to-one chance of a nuclear meltdown any day.
@Kohdok Add these million to one odds up. There are 440 reactors in the world. Arco Idaho went first. 3 mile Island, Chernobyl, Some 5 in Japan now, it's not just Fuku, you know. Now in Virginia some went into automatic shutdown and the same in Ft Calhoun NB in July. Then there are the "incidents' we don't know or have not been told of....Pretend there are 440 cars in the world and this happens. Would you be in favor of cars? (the correct answer is no) watch?v=36VrXtAS2uE
@IExposeMormonism What? You're making my answer for me? Wow. You don't even know the rules of basic debate. I believe you have succeeded in proving yourself a lunatic by calling a bearded man with a receding hairline a pre-teen and then presuming my answers for me. Stop frothing at the mouth a little and do some research. The Courrières mine disaster, the Exxon Valdez, Taum Salk Dam; the Three Mile Island of dam accidents and the current fracking debate to start.
@Kohdok I was calling you a pre teen for your obsession with cartoon videos. Plus you claim 24. Which when mixed with videos, is preteen plus this an one of those exchanges. That's the simple matter. Yes those are serious issues you raise but you ignore/deny the reality of way over 1million deaths over 25 years Your gov't is lying to you. About many things. Fuku is a least 30 more like 300 Chernobyl's. Virginia is serious, fossil fuel is insane, natural gas is cure and blah blah blah, I win.
@Kohdok Almost, just remember you're the one describing yourself as receding hairline and bearded. Which for 24 is rare. Natural gas is limitless. and cheap. Did you know there were nuclear powered 707's in c1960? I saw one. I think out at Holoman AFB in N.M.
@IExposeMormonism Yeah, because fracking is sooooooo good for the environment. So good that even people in Texas are clamoring for a bill to know how badly it's poisoning them.
I live in Pennsylvania less than 100 miles from Three Mile Island we had to live though all of the danger I was 10 years old when his accident happened and I rembember how everybody was one edge about this nuclear power is safe but there are risks involved I hope what happened in japan can be resolved and hopefully everything will be all right I know how they must be feeling about it.
I love this film very much - great directing, editing, acting, producing....everything. Jack Lemmon was just brilliant. Jane Fonda and Michael Douglas were great too. Some moments reminded me of sad disaster on Chernobyl (Ukraine).
1979 is one of my favorite years in film - this one, Alien, The Apocalypse Now, Moonraker, Mad Max, Rocky 2, The Brood, All That Jazz, 1941 etc
Nuclear technology is safe, it's the humans that aren't. Nuclear technology is designed to handle problems, not human intervention. All nuclear accidents to date (save Fuku) have been caused by human error, the technology in itself is perfectly sound. I am not afraid of nuclear power, I'm afraid of the humans that use it.
JonatanGronoset 3 weeks ago
@JonatanGronoset
What about the toxic waste that's generated by a nuclear power plant (spent fuel rods, etc.)? To my knowledge, there is no safe way to dispose of it.
jerico641 1 week ago
@jerico641 We shove it up the NIMBYs asses, it'll be safe there. :D
JonatanGronoset 1 week ago
@JonatanGronoset
What, pray tell, is a NIMBY (I assume that's an acronym)?
jerico641 1 week ago
@jerico641 Not In My Back Yard, the biggest opposers of anything.
JonatanGronoset 1 week ago
@JonatanGronoset
Well, I wouldn't want radioactive waste in my backyard either; it seems to me that if nuclear power were truly safe, where we put the waste wouldn't matter. And if it's not safe, maybe we should reconsider nuclear power until we can find an answer to this.
jerico641 1 week ago
@jerico641 I didn't say nuclear waste was safe, I said the technology is safe, as long as humans don't tamper with it. Difference.
JonatanGronoset 1 week ago
@JonatanGronoset
I realize that, but I can't see how we can divorce the waste products from the technology itself. I've read that some companies actually excavate shallow ditches, then line them and fill them with water, then place the hot fuel rods in there. If the water evaporates for any reason, the rods will expel dangerous contaminants to the immediate area and beyond. That seems remarkably dangerous, not to mention toxic to the water table.
jerico641 1 week ago
@jerico641
There are ways of disposing of nuclear wastes. You can look at the processes used in countries with a closed fuel cycle, such as France. Nuclear wastes are recycled : the remaining uranium and plutonium are used again in the power plants, the metal part are compressed and put in special containers, and the fission product and minor actinides (the most radioactive wastes) are vitrified.
olrikisback 5 days ago
@olrikisback
I see; what does "vitrified" mean exactly?
jerico641 4 days ago
@jerico641
Vitrification is basically a process where the wastes are transformed into glass. To be more precise, fission products and minor actinides atoms are confined within a glass matrix (they are not surrounded by glass, they are part of the glass structure). This process is very technical (a lot of research has been developed to achieve it), but vitrified wastes are very stable. They resist very well to alteration or self irradiation.
olrikisback 4 days ago
Nuclear power is a Jewish fraud. See nukelies dot com
rerevisionist 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I am Japanese. "Shit Nuclear Industry !!!!"
PIC16F555 1 month ago
the image is flipped...
tuttt99 2 months ago
ITS IN FUCKING SPANISH WHY THE FUCK WE CANNOT SEE IT IN ENGLISH AND STOP PISSING AROUND FUCK IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
albionjq 2 months ago
Would sure like to see this movie,but every body has to piss around and tell you to go here or go here or go here or go here.Enough already ,show the f---in movie or shut the f--- up!
RACINGWILDONE 2 months ago
Fukushima TEPCO was just like this, and so was Chernobyl. Where is the next film?
YeOldClipper 2 months ago
Wow....Released 12 days before the Three Mile Island accident. That's a strange irony.
cuznvinnie818 3 months ago
That sound. . .is the sound of a dot matrix printer. . .sigh. . .
SiliconBong 4 months ago
@CptnHardcore09 They do it to avoid copyright. Just incase you didnt know =)
atvboy11 4 months ago
Wow, so few movies of this era have aged well but this is just as captivating... and just as scary now as it was then. Maybe even more so.
yonezawa1965 6 months ago
Well, it's not coming back up a Fukushima. there are 3 complete core meltdowns. and that's only what the liars at Tepco are admitting to now. Research the truth. It will set you free.
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Far more people die in coal mines than in nuclear disasters. An unstoppable coal mine fire in Pennsylvania is causing pollution, road damage and sinkholes to this day after burning for many years. The only US deaths from nuclear incidents happened in 1961. Nearly 100 times that many died in coal mines in the US in that same year. More people die mining coal in China in a single year than died in all of Chernobyl's fallout.
Research the truth. It will set you free.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok You're wrong. Millions have died from cancer at Chernobyl. and so it will be at Fuku.. This has only just begun. your coal mining comparisons are absurd. You must be a Tepco collusionist. Stay in your bondage of lies, or research and find out what's Really going on at Fuku and and what's still going on around Chernobyl today. Neither ended after the explosions, that's when it begins and it goes on for decades.
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Excuse me... "Millions"? Not even Greenpeace made an estimate that high. Not even in that ballpark. Nuclear power gives off radioactivity only when there's a problem, coal power plants put out radioactivity, as well as mercury and soot, as part of SOP. I think you need to do some research and actually make an educated response next time.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok Your wrong. Greenpeace is a front organization for the folks that own them. Don't expect to hear much from them on Fukushima, there one attempt to test the water is BS.Many other have already done it. You're the most stupid commenter I've seen on nuclear issues. And Many experts have said Millions have and will die from Chernobyl. The radiation numbers at 20 miles out from Fuku are higher than Chernobyl and millions will die over the years. You're being lied to and are liar yourself
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@Kohdok No wonder your so ignorant, your lost in video games. And your 24? Stay off my pages, I've blocked you. Go get an education. Your lost in a TV set reality
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism So...you're basically saying I've won? Because the only way you can end the argument is by running away? I guess you did the five seconds of Google research that proved you wrong but don't want to admit it. Real cute.
By the way, stop speaking in Caps Lock on your page. It makes you look insane.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok You're a teenage retard. Go play your childish video games and leave the serious issues to people that can see. Calling you a retard and moron is an insult to retards and morons.
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Now you can't even keep my age straight. Didn't you just say I was 24? That's not a teenager by anybody's standards.
And I'm not a Mormon. Worse, I'm a Quaker. A bleeding Liberal, loving, tolerating, pacifistic Quaker and have been for ten generations.
If you can't even keep your years straight, I suggest you go outside, take a breath of fresh air, switch on some music, and relax a little.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok You're a pre teen. You're age, like your opinions, are all erroneous. Nixon was a Quaker. You a Nixon? You need some Firesign theater
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism You know, I used to think the same things about nuclear power that you do. Then I read about BP-level oil spills happening all the time in the middle east, mine collapses and air pollution from coal, dams displacing millions of people, "fracking" for natural gas, earthquakes caused by Geothermal and the lack of viability of wind and solar power due to moody weather.
Considering the alternatives, I'll take the million-to-one chance of a nuclear meltdown any day.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok Add these million to one odds up. There are 440 reactors in the world. Arco Idaho went first. 3 mile Island, Chernobyl, Some 5 in Japan now, it's not just Fuku, you know. Now in Virginia some went into automatic shutdown and the same in Ft Calhoun NB in July. Then there are the "incidents' we don't know or have not been told of....Pretend there are 440 cars in the world and this happens. Would you be in favor of cars? (the correct answer is no) watch?v=36VrXtAS2uE
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism What? You're making my answer for me? Wow. You don't even know the rules of basic debate. I believe you have succeeded in proving yourself a lunatic by calling a bearded man with a receding hairline a pre-teen and then presuming my answers for me. Stop frothing at the mouth a little and do some research. The Courrières mine disaster, the Exxon Valdez, Taum Salk Dam; the Three Mile Island of dam accidents and the current fracking debate to start.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok I was calling you a pre teen for your obsession with cartoon videos. Plus you claim 24. Which when mixed with videos, is preteen plus this an one of those exchanges. That's the simple matter. Yes those are serious issues you raise but you ignore/deny the reality of way over 1million deaths over 25 years Your gov't is lying to you. About many things. Fuku is a least 30 more like 300 Chernobyl's. Virginia is serious, fossil fuel is insane, natural gas is cure and blah blah blah, I win.
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Yeah, you're officially crazy. I believe we're done here.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok Almost, just remember you're the one describing yourself as receding hairline and bearded. Which for 24 is rare. Natural gas is limitless. and cheap. Did you know there were nuclear powered 707's in c1960? I saw one. I think out at Holoman AFB in N.M.
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
@IExposeMormonism Yeah, because fracking is sooooooo good for the environment. So good that even people in Texas are clamoring for a bill to know how badly it's poisoning them.
Kohdok 6 months ago
@Kohdok alright you win
IExposeMormonism 6 months ago
I live in Pennsylvania less than 100 miles from Three Mile Island we had to live though all of the danger I was 10 years old when his accident happened and I rembember how everybody was one edge about this nuclear power is safe but there are risks involved I hope what happened in japan can be resolved and hopefully everything will be all right I know how they must be feeling about it.
Tim4706 6 months ago
I love this film very much - great directing, editing, acting, producing....everything. Jack Lemmon was just brilliant. Jane Fonda and Michael Douglas were great too. Some moments reminded me of sad disaster on Chernobyl (Ukraine).
1979 is one of my favorite years in film - this one, Alien, The Apocalypse Now, Moonraker, Mad Max, Rocky 2, The Brood, All That Jazz, 1941 etc
Magnolia296 9 months ago
いい加減な定期検査という部分とPWR型で運転員が水位の上昇を恐れるのをムリムリ組み合わせてるのですが、後者はスリーマイルで実際に起ったことでもありよくてきていますね。
sigps216091 10 months ago
プリンタ
REACTOR WATER LEVEL- 145 IN
CORE TEMPERATURE- 350 F
REACTOR PRESSURE- 135.1 PSI
STABLE SHUTDOWN
EVENT ENDS 15:36:00.3
EVENT DURATION 00:02:45.0
sigps216091 10 months ago
sigps216091 10 months ago
めがね'This is'nt High'
レモンがメータを叩く
リアクターの水位レベル上昇がメータの張り付きによる誤表示と気づく
レモンが作業員にセーフティーエリアへの退避を指示
リアクターの水位レベル下降し続ける
レモン高圧給水系に毒づく
レモン圧を抜くことを指示
めがねに反対されるがレモンが自分で操作(Main Sterm Line Valve Trip Bypassed)
sigps216091 10 months ago
レモンがバーニーに蒸気ラインのロストを心配して弁開放(Releaf Valve 14,15)を指示
'Turbine Stop Valves & Control Valve Trip Bypasswd'表示点滅
'Sys 1 Dische Header High Pressure'表示点滅
めがねがBook(操作手順)に従ってないと反対
バーニーがREIEF VALVE 14,15をTRIP操作
制御卓のリアクターの水位レベル変化せず(REACTOR WATER LEVEL 320)
レモンがバーニーにIsolation VALVEのOPENを指示
バーニーが別のREACTOR WATER LABEL(LEVEL ABOVE TOP ACTIVE FUEL) CORE FLOWのメータは低位を示しているのに気づく
sigps216091 10 months ago
15:34:35.2 FEEDWATER ISO VALVE C...
15:34:35.7 FEEDWATER ISO VALVE C...
めがね'REACTOR SCRAM'
ジャックレモンがコーヒーの振動を感じる
2次冷却水への放射線もれ赤表示(Rediation in Containment Level 8)
ゴードンが興奮するがレモンはリラックスするように言う
バーニー'REACTOR PRESSURE BUCK NORMAL'
制御卓のリアクターの水位レベル上昇(REACTOR WATER LEVEL 320)
sigps216091 10 months ago
sigps216091 10 months ago