I NOTICED MANY HOVERING "HELICOPTERS" DURING THE POINT OF IMPACTS AND SHORTLY THEREAFTER,HOWEVER I ALSO NOTICED THE LACK OF ROTARY BLADES AND MANY "FLASH IN THE PAN" STREAKS ACROSS THE SKY ON TELEVISION. look at any footage and you will also see hovering objects watching history in the making. THERE'S ALSO A CLIP OF AN ANGEL LANDING ON THE TOP OF AN ANTENNA WATCHING PEOPLE JUMP OUT OF BUILDINGS- IF ANYONE KNOWS OF THIS VIDEO LET ME KNOW (the angel is translucent in appearance). he's there.
CNN had offices on the top 2 floors of 5 Penn Plaza. Go to wikipedia and search 1 Penn Plaza, which is where Devin was. Look to the right hand side of the wiki page and the third picture down. 1 Penn is the tall black building. 5 Penn is the white, shorter, wider building right behind it in that photo. Notice the close proximity. Checking the angles by lining up mid-distance buildings confirm that the CNN video was taken from the roof of 5 Penn Plaza.
what is the point of this video. it's as if they deny that two people in the generally same area looking at a massive skyline with enormous buildings might not get a similar image.
Whatz yur point, poindextor? That there was no plane? or he couldn't have filmed that angle from his building or something? If you look compare the two shots you say are the same, there is some parallax differences, meathead. From many blocks away looking at such massive objects you could be within a wide circumference up and down and in any 360 direction and produce nearly identical footage from inside that virtual sphere.
funny that in the fox wnyw broadcast heard in the background, the tower is hit at the exact same moment as it's happenening "in front of these guys" yet that is not physically possible, since we have a delay of at least a few seconds from studio to tv audience...
"perhaps purposefully" is the key part. (at 07:10)
ok if u guys were smart they just took planes and mad copys of them so it lookd like these plane hit the bulidings cuz i seen the exact same nmber as the first plane that crashed...so this was just a escuse by bush to go to war in iraq cuz we need more oil and hes just a noisey good for nothing ass hole that needs to go die in a hole...
look closly at 43 seconds into this, if you watch the cloudof smoke by the 1st tower that was hit, something sliver adn shiny goes across ur screen to the left..im serious this isnt one of those retarded jokes but seriously look for it! its kinda creepy an wtf is it??
there was no missile you asshole they stole the plane from an airport and if you were smart enough people would have detected them think before you speak ya dumb fuck
ya . . .that "plane" at the end of the video OBVIOUSLY fired a missle because there weren't any police helicopters or other aircraft flying around WTC1 assessing the damage and the situation.
notice something wrong??? when the second display pops up, you see the plane skipping and flying slow into the building. ITS DEVIN CLARKS VIDEO! and thats live... thats proves that devin clark is full of shit.
The laws of physics for idiots - 1) aluminum and compressed air cannot fully pennetrate concrete and steel ay ANY speed 2) max speed for a 767 at 700 feet altitude is 250 mph, not 550 (call boeing yourself) 3) the fake "planes" melt into the WTC and explode on the opposite side (no deceleration and no sound of impact) 4)16 different aircraft and 9 different approach paths in 24 seperate videos If you believe this stupid-ass story, you are no better than the motherfuckers who did this.
If anyone says compressed air and aluminium can't peirce a concrete and steel building at any speed, they are retarded. A plane, which funnily enough was a bomber, has hit the Empire State Building before. For those of you who didn't know. Google it.
@Ethanace true. Although it was much smaller plane traveling at much lower speed. And "funnily enough", one of the engines of that plane completely penetrated the building and landed on a rooftop of a building to the south. Google it.
And multiple parts of debris from the jets that hit the twin towers was also scattered across the streets of New York City blocks away from the World Trade Center.
I could ask you the same question, lol. What are you getting at by pointing out that this bomber almost fully penetrated the Empire State Building as it's parts came out and landed elsewhere?
@Ethanace I think I may have misread your initial response, lol. I thought you were implying that the planes should have bounced off the buildings like most of these truthers think. Perhaps we're on the same side here. I believe planes hit the the WTC (OMG, seriously! I must be crazy, right?).
It's amazing how people misuse newton's law and pythagorean theorem and suddenly the uneducated call it a conspiracy.
Yes, people using logical fallacy and sophisticated terminology which they can't even justify is very irritating, such as "These planes were simply visual and audible illusions created by highly exotic weapon technology in the form of orbs.." and if you ask them what they mean by exotic, and ask them to describe this "orb" they can do neither, which makes their point completely void unless they have an explanation.
wavexpress, where Clark worked when he made this vid has direct connections to people in military and intelligence. Look it up , it isn't hard to figure out. The media, which has the same connections, is not going to do it for you.
Even the speech of Bush at the Booker Elementary School at Florida was dated as 10-SEP-2001 while the events taking place on September 12th at CNN have the date of 11-SEP-2001, which is a deliberate confusion.
People indeed died, towers indeed demolished. Every detail only known to the perps. Avanced aircraft and military choppers in disguise were flying all over the 9/11 events.
We can not deny every piece of footage, rather we compare it with other to conclude which things match and which things lack of correspondence, like those discrepancies in the "planes" aired first and filmed by multiple perps on 9/11.
I NOTICED MANY HOVERING "HELICOPTERS" DURING THE POINT OF IMPACTS AND SHORTLY THEREAFTER,HOWEVER I ALSO NOTICED THE LACK OF ROTARY BLADES AND MANY "FLASH IN THE PAN" STREAKS ACROSS THE SKY ON TELEVISION. look at any footage and you will also see hovering objects watching history in the making. THERE'S ALSO A CLIP OF AN ANGEL LANDING ON THE TOP OF AN ANTENNA WATCHING PEOPLE JUMP OUT OF BUILDINGS- IF ANYONE KNOWS OF THIS VIDEO LET ME KNOW (the angel is translucent in appearance). he's there.
barroninc 2 months ago
at 4min u can see another airplane in the upper right
chillyrooster 8 months ago
@MarijuanaMichelle what are you smokin' MarijuanaMichelle?
sixdgrs 10 months ago
3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOLITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911
dhudson369 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOLITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911
dhudson369 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 NUKES 5 BOMBS A MISSILE A DEMOLITION CREW AND A LOT OF LIES = 911
dhudson369 11 months ago
HOLY COW!!!!!!!!!!!!! lol
ConstructionCentral 11 months ago
at 500 the planes were outside theyre operating parrameter
means they couldn't off controlled it at that speed.
weadone 1 year ago
i was there convince me i didnt watch it in person an if u give me some bs about a hologram im guna find u an smack the shit outta u.
xxAlmightyThorxx 1 year ago
Comment removed
xxAlmightyThorxx 1 year ago
interesting stuff.
MATTNATTMATT 1 year ago
CNN had offices on the top 2 floors of 5 Penn Plaza. Go to wikipedia and search 1 Penn Plaza, which is where Devin was. Look to the right hand side of the wiki page and the third picture down. 1 Penn is the tall black building. 5 Penn is the white, shorter, wider building right behind it in that photo. Notice the close proximity. Checking the angles by lining up mid-distance buildings confirm that the CNN video was taken from the roof of 5 Penn Plaza.
jmdewey60 1 year ago
I know Devin Clark! He's my sister's friend. Real nice dude.
StudebakerBronson 1 year ago
dudeee devin clark is my friggin cousion lol...im serious
Uglydolllover123 1 year ago
Is this a joke??
cesarisaias95 2 years ago
what is the point of this video. it's as if they deny that two people in the generally same area looking at a massive skyline with enormous buildings might not get a similar image.
oldagent89 3 years ago
who the fuck says "holy cow" in new york city?
mot10001 3 years ago 7
Phil Rizzutto used to say that in every game as the broadcaster for the NY Yankees....
KWRBT 2 years ago
That was back in 2001, people talked different back then :D
AberryTV 2 years ago
lol
codysellers44 2 years ago
NO ONE THATS WHO thats a southen term
codysellers44 2 years ago
Whatz yur point, poindextor? That there was no plane? or he couldn't have filmed that angle from his building or something? If you look compare the two shots you say are the same, there is some parallax differences, meathead. From many blocks away looking at such massive objects you could be within a wide circumference up and down and in any 360 direction and produce nearly identical footage from inside that virtual sphere.
chaucer44 3 years ago 2
Exactly, not even sure what the real point of this video was anyway. Thanks for your clear explanation. Except for the funny meathead bit. :)
oldagent89 3 years ago
funny that in the fox wnyw broadcast heard in the background, the tower is hit at the exact same moment as it's happenening "in front of these guys" yet that is not physically possible, since we have a delay of at least a few seconds from studio to tv audience...
"perhaps purposefully" is the key part. (at 07:10)
watch?v=GyD2TEUWXD0
lnrdshelby 3 years ago
ok if u guys were smart they just took planes and mad copys of them so it lookd like these plane hit the bulidings cuz i seen the exact same nmber as the first plane that crashed...so this was just a escuse by bush to go to war in iraq cuz we need more oil and hes just a noisey good for nothing ass hole that needs to go die in a hole...
AngelBabi007 3 years ago
look closly at 43 seconds into this, if you watch the cloudof smoke by the 1st tower that was hit, something sliver adn shiny goes across ur screen to the left..im serious this isnt one of those retarded jokes but seriously look for it! its kinda creepy an wtf is it??
AngelBabi007 3 years ago
It's a helicopter I think. You can see them hovering around the first tower after it was hit.
MarianbkL 3 years ago
there was no missile you asshole they stole the plane from an airport and if you were smart enough people would have detected them think before you speak ya dumb fuck
ucballday01 3 years ago
ya . . .that "plane" at the end of the video OBVIOUSLY fired a missle because there weren't any police helicopters or other aircraft flying around WTC1 assessing the damage and the situation.
nevmiles 3 years ago
Lol is the caller canadian? Cause he says ABOUT funny. Sounds like a boot.
WTCTribute 3 years ago
/watch?v=7beNVLFFgy8
notice something wrong??? when the second display pops up, you see the plane skipping and flying slow into the building. ITS DEVIN CLARKS VIDEO! and thats live... thats proves that devin clark is full of shit.
chibangin007 3 years ago
The laws of physics for idiots - 1) aluminum and compressed air cannot fully pennetrate concrete and steel ay ANY speed 2) max speed for a 767 at 700 feet altitude is 250 mph, not 550 (call boeing yourself) 3) the fake "planes" melt into the WTC and explode on the opposite side (no deceleration and no sound of impact) 4)16 different aircraft and 9 different approach paths in 24 seperate videos If you believe this stupid-ass story, you are no better than the motherfuckers who did this.
NINEELEVENNEWS 3 years ago 3
hmm what happened to the planes and the people on them? did they hide them in area 51?
pdbuster 3 years ago
@NINEELEVENNEWS Hahahahaha dude, you need to get your therapist to change the dosage.
Cowcharge 1 year ago
@NINEELEVENNEWS It's been 2 years now, care to change any of this?
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NINEELEVENNEWS
"aluminum and compressed air cannot fully pennetrate concrete and steel ay ANY speed "
Wow, idiotic. So a Plane consistent of an AL-alloy travelling with the speed of 50.000 kmh could not penetrate a steel plate 10 in thick?.
"concrete and steel"
Oh, ok, there was no concrete only few inch thick box profiles.
"2) max speed for a 767 at 700 feet altitude is 250 mph, not 550 (call boeing yourself)"
Ask Boeing whats the max speed having a declining fligh path.
palasta 1 year ago
@NINEELEVENNEWS
If anyone says compressed air and aluminium can't peirce a concrete and steel building at any speed, they are retarded. A plane, which funnily enough was a bomber, has hit the Empire State Building before. For those of you who didn't know. Google it.
Ethanace 1 year ago
@Ethanace true. Although it was much smaller plane traveling at much lower speed. And "funnily enough", one of the engines of that plane completely penetrated the building and landed on a rooftop of a building to the south. Google it.
sixdgrs 10 months ago
@sixdgrs
And multiple parts of debris from the jets that hit the twin towers was also scattered across the streets of New York City blocks away from the World Trade Center.
Ethanace 10 months ago
@Ethanace also true. Where are you going with this?
sixdgrs 10 months ago
@sixdgrs
I could ask you the same question, lol. What are you getting at by pointing out that this bomber almost fully penetrated the Empire State Building as it's parts came out and landed elsewhere?
Ethanace 10 months ago
@Ethanace I think I may have misread your initial response, lol. I thought you were implying that the planes should have bounced off the buildings like most of these truthers think. Perhaps we're on the same side here. I believe planes hit the the WTC (OMG, seriously! I must be crazy, right?).
It's amazing how people misuse newton's law and pythagorean theorem and suddenly the uneducated call it a conspiracy.
sixdgrs 10 months ago
@sixdgrs
Yes, people using logical fallacy and sophisticated terminology which they can't even justify is very irritating, such as "These planes were simply visual and audible illusions created by highly exotic weapon technology in the form of orbs.." and if you ask them what they mean by exotic, and ask them to describe this "orb" they can do neither, which makes their point completely void unless they have an explanation.
Ethanace 10 months ago
wavexpress, where Clark worked when he made this vid has direct connections to people in military and intelligence. Look it up , it isn't hard to figure out. The media, which has the same connections, is not going to do it for you.
benedictrove 4 years ago 2
My friend 911stealth2 says CNN
'deliberately labek them with the wrong date: 10-SEP-2001'
I would disagree and suggest that the date on the left (10-SEP-2001) is the date they got the video or that it was actually recorded.
I am absolutely sure the WNYW HIGH5 segment was prerecorded and that much more was as well.
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago
Even the speech of Bush at the Booker Elementary School at Florida was dated as 10-SEP-2001 while the events taking place on September 12th at CNN have the date of 11-SEP-2001, which is a deliberate confusion.
911stealth2 4 years ago
cool.
I hate to sound paranoid, but, do you really think he was at Booker on 911?
Sort of like the planted parts issue; once we discover a planted part, how can we confirm the other parts might be real?
They faked what they showed us on 911. Where was the line drawn? Did Andrew Card know what he was shown wispering into dubya's ear?
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago
watch?v=PBJvN_IYzJI
&
watch?v=hvYqRTPtrNc
People indeed died, towers indeed demolished. Every detail only known to the perps. Avanced aircraft and military choppers in disguise were flying all over the 9/11 events.
We can not deny every piece of footage, rather we compare it with other to conclude which things match and which things lack of correspondence, like those discrepancies in the "planes" aired first and filmed by multiple perps on 9/11.
911stealth2 4 years ago
@911stealth2 Yeah, it must have been really hard to find that clip labelled "9/11 clips", LOL.
Cowcharge 1 year ago