Pity Hubble couldn't be put in a higher orbit.... some kind of moth ball kit.... and if space could be accessed cheaply in the future... this could be used as a training academic asset for some university, small government or other private venture. Getting access to cutting edge telescopes is a chore.
Has anyone seen, or taken photos from earth (or from Hubble), that shows any equipment left behind by man on the moon? If so, where can these images be found and viewed? For example, can one see the lunar rover left behind? Just curious...
According to the NASA vid they are installing a capture unit on Hubble with an eye towards a future mission (Next transport system) to retrieve and return it to Earth. Be a heck of a museum display. Have the real thing to show.
yea u gotta be traveling at five miles per second and you wudnt kno cuz space is so vast and large that an objest like the earth sun or moon wud be to far away to immediately register that you were moving that fast . i wonder how much the new telescope costs
When you're in the vacuum of space and you hop out of your vehicle that is traveling at 5 miles per second, there is nothing to decelerate you. They probable don't even notice how fast they are traveling.
hubble was designed to be serviced by the shuttle so their futures are inextricably linked. its a good thing its being replaced with a different yet overall more capable system
yeah, yeah,bla,bla,bla....after so many year5s can anybody tell me what this piece of shit is good for? has anybody seen any pictures taken?I know there's been a few shown to the people but not given any knowledge to the common people of what there is out there,maybe because it is actually pointed to earth spying on us ....they sure can see our asses...
The Hubble is a technology wonder wich allows us to take a view of amazing places in Universe.Hope that view changes not only your scientific knowledge but also your spiritual beliefs;what you see is the Angels home.
Too bad they plan to let it fall down. Isn't there a way to get it back to earth in one piece? I'm sure a lot of people would like to see the giant that provided people with stunning pictures for so long. It would be a shame to let it just get destroyed by earths gravity.
Plans can always change, and there was a mission on the table to retrieve the Hubble. At half a BILLION dollars per shuttle mission, I think they decided it simply wasn't worth the money to try and save it.
Well, given the fact that it cost that much, I'd say it's actually worth it to retrieve it. After surviving that many orbits and years (and so many repairs) I think studying it back on earth on how it's condition is now might actually shed some light on how things survive that long in space.
There is always the chance that an outside source will fund it and keep it going, or NASA will decide that it is worth the money and keep it going. We'll have a special on the Webb telescope soon so you can see why it is cooler though :)
It is so high up that we don't need to worry about it for a long, long time. I believe the latest estimates are 2032 at the soonest. From there we can either retrieve the system in LEO or drop in in the ocean with a controlled burn like MIR. Not really a big deal, but once the orbit deteriorates enough it won't be able to perform its main task anymore
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
hubble is a cover up.. nothing Nasa tells us is true.. they are a military agency and their job is to LIE, LIE and LIE some more and cover up everything surrounding alien life.. Also the air force.. when they finally start the truth, maybe they will regain my trust and respect.
"Mike broke the Hubble"
"bet no one recognizzes that quote"
Can you spell Ball?
Gotcha!
N4CUZ1 9 months ago
Pity Hubble couldn't be put in a higher orbit.... some kind of moth ball kit.... and if space could be accessed cheaply in the future... this could be used as a training academic asset for some university, small government or other private venture. Getting access to cutting edge telescopes is a chore.
granddad2002 11 months ago
Does any one know why we can't keep on using Hubble along with the new telescopes??
I don't think there is enough telescope time for all the astronomers.
KKM121 2 years ago
Has anyone seen, or taken photos from earth (or from Hubble), that shows any equipment left behind by man on the moon? If so, where can these images be found and viewed? For example, can one see the lunar rover left behind? Just curious...
MusicTubeLover 2 years ago
the Hubble Space Telescope is going to be shut down in 2014 i think
ass23ful 2 years ago
humble
altairx26 2 years ago
I din't know hubble was orbiting earth . i always thought its position in space was fixed .
peterm3964 2 years ago
It has to be in orbit or it would just be overwealmed by the earths gravity and burn up :)
steveiouk 2 years ago
its ok, i thought it was on earth hahaha :) extremely interesting though :)
spacecowboy22 2 years ago
So you're saying Hubble is going to become "rubble". And just who's head is it coming down on?
Make sure it's your head and not mine.
hagvcutadfu 3 years ago
According to the NASA vid they are installing a capture unit on Hubble with an eye towards a future mission (Next transport system) to retrieve and return it to Earth. Be a heck of a museum display. Have the real thing to show.
roadrodent1952 2 years ago
Um, HELLO it burns up while re-entering the atmosphere.
DarkAlex174 2 years ago
huh? Atmosphere FAIL?
"Yes, it WILL BURN UP upon re-ENTERING our atmosphere."
"... some of the stages DIDN'T BURN UP because they were ejected BEFORE we were OUTSIDE of the atmosphere."
When will it burn up, outside or inside our atmosphere? Neither? :(
jaycetwo 3 years ago
well, I would say in the stratosphere, where most meteors burn up.
HappyLappyNappy 2 years ago
That is really sad.
KosmynC64 3 years ago
Mike broke the hubble!
Mike broke the hubble!
bet no one recognizes that quote.
grazon 3 years ago 3
MST3K FTW!
spacevidcast 3 years ago
stinking google makes finding quotes to easy.
*wink*
grazon 3 years ago
While that is true, you'll note that SpaceVidcast is based in Minneapolis, MN... A lot like a certain show of yesteryear.
spacevidcast 3 years ago
oh nooo
adamefly 3 years ago
Here's a crazy idea.. give the fuel tanks of the next one (that we're gonna pay for) a refill valve.
Crazy I know.
Tampajoe77 3 years ago
Hmm... looks like a hot chick just wasn't in the budget...
backfire357 3 years ago
I certainly hope you're not insulting my wife.
spacevidcast 3 years ago
Oh sorry... HEEEELLLLOOOOO NURSE! better?
backfire357 3 years ago
im going to miss the hubble telescope i dont wanna call the other telescope something other than hubble
reductofacto 3 years ago
I had heard that the Grays were using it for a milkshake maker.
UnconcernedCitizen 3 years ago
I'll save you Hubble!
tonkaaaaa 3 years ago
there just going to let it fall!
but im glad there replacing it i love space =3
TheColorGang 3 years ago
i love the hubble
gavinbishop80 3 years ago
wait where would the hubble land???
naraicks 3 years ago
naraicks; In the ocean.
levinceh 3 years ago
inthefade; "with hubble, rationing and sharing access is difficult, because so many different astronomers want to have access.
Having double the access would be great.
I'm sure it makes sense to ditch hubble, but it's sad."
Good point, thought i read or heard somewhere that it was pretty much used all day.
We'll see what happens to Hubble in the future, NASA has with no doubt the money to keep it running for years to come, yet is it really worth it.
levinceh 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FAKE!
YooTubeIsFAKE 3 years ago
The hubble never went anywhere. Every thing else just moved around it ;-)
test951 3 years ago
LOLOLOLOL
spacevidcast 3 years ago
yea u gotta be traveling at five miles per second and you wudnt kno cuz space is so vast and large that an objest like the earth sun or moon wud be to far away to immediately register that you were moving that fast . i wonder how much the new telescope costs
kwlboy27 3 years ago
yes
aKitten123 3 years ago
so...how do you fix a telescope that travels at 5 miles per sec?
tanginumin00 3 years ago
You travel at 5 miles per sec.
YawnGod 3 years ago
When you're in the vacuum of space and you hop out of your vehicle that is traveling at 5 miles per second, there is nothing to decelerate you. They probable don't even notice how fast they are traveling.
SuperWTFman 3 years ago
Same way you dock with an International Space Station traveling at 17,500 MPH...
Well, a little different, actually ;)
spacevidcast 3 years ago
hubble was designed to be serviced by the shuttle so their futures are inextricably linked. its a good thing its being replaced with a different yet overall more capable system
lvecsey 3 years ago
yeah, yeah,bla,bla,bla....after so many year5s can anybody tell me what this piece of shit is good for? has anybody seen any pictures taken?I know there's been a few shown to the people but not given any knowledge to the common people of what there is out there,maybe because it is actually pointed to earth spying on us ....they sure can see our asses...
serubiel666 3 years ago
The Hubble is a technology wonder wich allows us to take a view of amazing places in Universe.Hope that view changes not only your scientific knowledge but also your spiritual beliefs;what you see is the Angels home.
ALICEBLUEBERRY 3 years ago
Think if they dropped the main mirror....thats a lot of bad luck
cubswin0845 3 years ago 3
Too bad they plan to let it fall down. Isn't there a way to get it back to earth in one piece? I'm sure a lot of people would like to see the giant that provided people with stunning pictures for so long. It would be a shame to let it just get destroyed by earths gravity.
BarneySaysHi 3 years ago 4
Plans can always change, and there was a mission on the table to retrieve the Hubble. At half a BILLION dollars per shuttle mission, I think they decided it simply wasn't worth the money to try and save it.
This of course can always change.
spacevidcast 3 years ago
Hubble is the greatest tressure on earth
trm850225 3 years ago 6
@trm850225 I couldn't let this one go. It's spelled "treasure," and it is certainly not "on earth."
TehKign12356 1 year ago
Well, given the fact that it cost that much, I'd say it's actually worth it to retrieve it. After surviving that many orbits and years (and so many repairs) I think studying it back on earth on how it's condition is now might actually shed some light on how things survive that long in space.
BarneySaysHi 3 years ago 2
I know I would pay money to go see it in Florida or Texas.
a2zballa 3 years ago
I wonder why it is not financially viable to keep nudging it into a higher orbit? Wouldn't TWO telescopes be better than one?
inthefade 3 years ago
If the new one is better than the old one, why keep the old one.
Besides it would cost a lot to keep them both up to date with new upgrades aswell as repairing broken things.
levinceh 3 years ago
with hubble, rationing and sharing access is difficult, because so many different astronomers want to have access.
Having double the access would be great.
I'm sure it makes sense to ditch hubble, but it's sad.
inthefade 3 years ago
There is always the chance that an outside source will fund it and keep it going, or NASA will decide that it is worth the money and keep it going. We'll have a special on the Webb telescope soon so you can see why it is cooler though :)
spacevidcast 3 years ago
kind of sad, hubbles fate
Bgrazier 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i lick pussy's
coshyno 3 years ago
Not at all. It is just her tone of voice. It is leading towards a feeling after another.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
was that n eye i saw???
look at it wen the vid gets to 1:24 sec
7878917374 3 years ago
It certainly is an eye...scary
goodfather88 3 years ago 2
Wait. "Well, we let it fall."??!!!
That's it?
Isn't that something to worry about? Will it disintegrate before it reaches earth? Other space ships don't.
Are we crossing our fingers that it will crash into an ocean? What is the PLAN, guys?
jaycetwo 3 years ago
It is so high up that we don't need to worry about it for a long, long time. I believe the latest estimates are 2032 at the soonest. From there we can either retrieve the system in LEO or drop in in the ocean with a controlled burn like MIR. Not really a big deal, but once the orbit deteriorates enough it won't be able to perform its main task anymore
spacevidcast 3 years ago
Whew! Thanks.
jaycetwo 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hubble is a cover up.. nothing Nasa tells us is true.. they are a military agency and their job is to LIE, LIE and LIE some more and cover up everything surrounding alien life.. Also the air force.. when they finally start the truth, maybe they will regain my trust and respect.
azzan360 3 years ago
get a life
Alexville 3 years ago
That's pretty harsh dude, it's possible that they are liars, but not THAT much.
goodfather88 3 years ago