Ron Paul would not vote for the Civil Rights act of 1964 which is what people like David Duke would do if they were given the same oppurtunity. His excuse because of property rights is null and void since the act was passed and Property owners rights haven't changed at all, in fact they've gotten stronger. So he is lying, He may be for liberty but only for liberty for himself and people who look like him, which he views as privelege everyone else but him do not deserve.
@slicingwater That's a bunch of bull. I don't care what he used to write, but come on....is race really still what you're worried about? Going back to being 2nd class citizens or slaves? I'm tired of people like you perpetrating that fear, it's over. Move onto the 21st century.
@tipofmytongue1024 I thought you cared about integrity, I at least expect political candidates to to read what they publish, and to at least think about what the acts they choose not to vote for will have on people and weigh them with the concern's they think it will create. Ron Paul has done none of that, therefore I think he is not a qualified candidate and doesn't deserve the support he has.
@slicingwater First, don't put words in my mouth. Second, that's all bullshit you're saying, all of it is possibility, not existence. How come none of this was mentioned in the 2008 election??
What other option is there? Newt? Yeah freakin right.
@tipofmytongue1024 I did not put words in your mouth. I apologize if I did. What do you mean by "possibility". Wasn't it mentioned in 2008 and before that in 2000, and it was mentioned the first time in 1996 if I recall right after the scandal was discovered, Since this had been going on before.
@slicingwater Al Gores daddy & Robert(KKK)Byrd led the longest filibuster in history against civil rights. Democrats fought emansipation, voting rights & civil rights. They also started the KKK, implemented segregation, used Bull Connor tactics & when they lost the battle, they turn around & call Conservatives racist & tell you they champion minority rights. Whats really sad is that most minorities fell for it.
@falcondriver100 Yeah so, I know all about that, I also know that republicans were liberal abolistionist who supported radical reconstruction after the civil war. They also didn't care much for states rights which is a poor excuse for segregation. And until 1968 with Nixon's "southern strategy" Also not all Democrats shared Robert Byrd's opinions just like there were racist republicans who employed the Southern Strategy like Nixon. And also the Democratic Party was the Conservative Party.
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
@falcondriver100 Their is an article on Wikipedia about it, with references to the New York times showing republicans apologizing for it and you want to tell me in a pew research paper of a sample of 3600 that this is a complete lie, well then where are your facts.
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
@falcondriver100 What you want me to try and defend the Democratic Party for its past actions and ideology. I actively condemn them, but were not dealing with 1950's democrats, Also I think at one point there was a democrat republican party. And most minorities realize that to. Also the Republicans coded language, lies, and racist policies and strategies aren't doing them any favors. The Democrats even when they were racist started social programs for the poor and elderly that benefit everyone.
Logically this doesn't make any sense. Ron Paul's newsletter had more than one instance of the surprising overt racism. And you're buying the story he didn't know about it. Either way its a lose lose situation for Ron Paul because if he truly didn't know about it. Than he is an inept negligent oblivious idiot, who doesn't know what his staff is reading or even takes interest in it. You elect that fool to the presidency he would start a land war with China and you'd know it before he did.
A vote in the U.S. Congress. Liberty Rising In 1979 Dr. Paul AKA RON PAUL VOTED yes For MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY. ALL VOTED NO NEWT, DICK CHENEY, Phil Grham, TRENT LOTT SOUNDS RACIST TO ME. THE NEWSLETTER SCANDEL IS BULLSH-T TO STEAL THE ELECTION. DR. PAUL VOTED FOR THE MARTIN LUTHER KING. FOX NEWS, CNN, MSNBC WHEN DR. PAUL WINS YOUR RATINGS ARE GOING DOWNNNNNN BACK THEN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WAS PISSED OFF AT RON PAUL FOR VOTING YES
Thank you for this video and I would like everyone to know that you can now see the, whole CNN interview on YouTube. And he doesn't just walk out.... The interview was a few minutes long but, CNN edited it to look like he walked out a soon as she ask that question and only that question. Why didn't they show the whole interview??? Don't get your info from the media. They've become just a TV. show & you should never believe everything on TV.
yeah but the problem is that there are some really dark things getting setup... Obama has his NDAA and now the TSA is getting set to expand to the roadways as well as the airports... The world is getting more dangerous my friends.
They are terrified of freedom..Of course he is under attack..When your directly over the target that's when the flak comes! The mainstream is starting to realize they are irrelevant and people can see past the lies, finally! I too will never again vote for the lesser of two evils...RP2012!
Hands up who is voting for Obama simply because of his colour,how shallow can a person be.
bladerunner123ish 4 days ago
Ron Paul would not vote for the Civil Rights act of 1964 which is what people like David Duke would do if they were given the same oppurtunity. His excuse because of property rights is null and void since the act was passed and Property owners rights haven't changed at all, in fact they've gotten stronger. So he is lying, He may be for liberty but only for liberty for himself and people who look like him, which he views as privelege everyone else but him do not deserve.
slicingwater 1 month ago
@slicingwater That's a bunch of bull. I don't care what he used to write, but come on....is race really still what you're worried about? Going back to being 2nd class citizens or slaves? I'm tired of people like you perpetrating that fear, it's over. Move onto the 21st century.
tipofmytongue1024 1 month ago 2
@tipofmytongue1024 I thought you cared about integrity, I at least expect political candidates to to read what they publish, and to at least think about what the acts they choose not to vote for will have on people and weigh them with the concern's they think it will create. Ron Paul has done none of that, therefore I think he is not a qualified candidate and doesn't deserve the support he has.
slicingwater 1 month ago
@slicingwater First, don't put words in my mouth. Second, that's all bullshit you're saying, all of it is possibility, not existence. How come none of this was mentioned in the 2008 election??
What other option is there? Newt? Yeah freakin right.
tipofmytongue1024 1 month ago
@tipofmytongue1024 I did not put words in your mouth. I apologize if I did. What do you mean by "possibility". Wasn't it mentioned in 2008 and before that in 2000, and it was mentioned the first time in 1996 if I recall right after the scandal was discovered, Since this had been going on before.
slicingwater 1 month ago
@slicingwater Al Gores daddy & Robert(KKK)Byrd led the longest filibuster in history against civil rights. Democrats fought emansipation, voting rights & civil rights. They also started the KKK, implemented segregation, used Bull Connor tactics & when they lost the battle, they turn around & call Conservatives racist & tell you they champion minority rights. Whats really sad is that most minorities fell for it.
falcondriver100 1 month ago
@falcondriver100 Yeah so, I know all about that, I also know that republicans were liberal abolistionist who supported radical reconstruction after the civil war. They also didn't care much for states rights which is a poor excuse for segregation. And until 1968 with Nixon's "southern strategy" Also not all Democrats shared Robert Byrd's opinions just like there were racist republicans who employed the Southern Strategy like Nixon. And also the Democratic Party was the Conservative Party.
slicingwater 1 month ago
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
falcondriver100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
falcondriver100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
falcondriver100 1 month ago
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
falcondriver100 1 month ago
@falcondriver100 Their is an article on Wikipedia about it, with references to the New York times showing republicans apologizing for it and you want to tell me in a pew research paper of a sample of 3600 that this is a complete lie, well then where are your facts.
slicingwater 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
falcondriver100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@slicingwater OMG, another brainwashed, revisionist history taught dummy. The partys didn't "switch" dude!! Thats a complete lie & has been PROVEN a lie in a 1996 PEW research poll of 3600 people in their 70's, 80's and 90's. They were asked "have you ever, in you lifetime switched parties from R to D or from D to R". 97.6 said "NO".
If my parents were still here, they'd laugh their asses off at being called a member of the "liberal party" in the 40's 50's & 60's!! Hahaha!
falcondriver100 1 month ago
@falcondriver100 What you want me to try and defend the Democratic Party for its past actions and ideology. I actively condemn them, but were not dealing with 1950's democrats, Also I think at one point there was a democrat republican party. And most minorities realize that to. Also the Republicans coded language, lies, and racist policies and strategies aren't doing them any favors. The Democrats even when they were racist started social programs for the poor and elderly that benefit everyone.
slicingwater 1 month ago
Logically this doesn't make any sense. Ron Paul's newsletter had more than one instance of the surprising overt racism. And you're buying the story he didn't know about it. Either way its a lose lose situation for Ron Paul because if he truly didn't know about it. Than he is an inept negligent oblivious idiot, who doesn't know what his staff is reading or even takes interest in it. You elect that fool to the presidency he would start a land war with China and you'd know it before he did.
slicingwater 1 month ago
WoW you look like a black chuck norris :OOO EPIC
PsycloneTest 1 month ago
This guy is awesome.
ErroneousDylan 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A vote in the U.S. Congress. Liberty Rising In 1979 Dr. Paul AKA RON PAUL VOTED yes For MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY. ALL VOTED NO NEWT, DICK CHENEY, Phil Grham, TRENT LOTT SOUNDS RACIST TO ME. THE NEWSLETTER SCANDEL IS BULLSH-T TO STEAL THE ELECTION. DR. PAUL VOTED FOR THE MARTIN LUTHER KING. FOX NEWS, CNN, MSNBC WHEN DR. PAUL WINS YOUR RATINGS ARE GOING DOWNNNNNN BACK THEN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WAS PISSED OFF AT RON PAUL FOR VOTING YES
G5F4D3S2A1 2 months ago
I love your videos
melnick1985 2 months ago
Thank you for this video and I would like everyone to know that you can now see the, whole CNN interview on YouTube. And he doesn't just walk out.... The interview was a few minutes long but, CNN edited it to look like he walked out a soon as she ask that question and only that question. Why didn't they show the whole interview??? Don't get your info from the media. They've become just a TV. show & you should never believe everything on TV.
Ha, the media is getting more like Korean News.
1978madrigal 2 months ago 2
ron paul is our only hope wake up people!!!! do u wanna live? exercise your rights or lose them
Fhofitness999 2 months ago
It is funny how they drag Ron Paul's name through the dirt. Saying he called MLK a philanderer etc. He was actually quoting an FBI report.
aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS 2 months ago
yeah but the problem is that there are some really dark things getting setup... Obama has his NDAA and now the TSA is getting set to expand to the roadways as well as the airports... The world is getting more dangerous my friends.
MatthewBMany 2 months ago
Cool...
slimeslider1 2 months ago
Her SYNOPSIS...lmao! But dang, I wish I could voice my opinion like him. Cause I feel the same way!
tipofmytongue1024 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos 2
@tipofmytongue1024 why can't you voice your opinion? If you have free will, you have a voice, you can do it too :) Ron Paul 2012!!!
MDVInstitute 2 months ago 2
@MDVInstitute It's not that I can't, I just can't articulate as well. I just sound like an idiot. lol
tipofmytongue1024 2 months ago
I've already watched this but it deserves another "like"
xylemphoenix 2 months ago
They are terrified of freedom..Of course he is under attack..When your directly over the target that's when the flak comes! The mainstream is starting to realize they are irrelevant and people can see past the lies, finally! I too will never again vote for the lesser of two evils...RP2012!
Fullrubberman 2 months ago 2