@RichKnight2010 Well Robertson loves the Bible. If you actually read the bible, you'll see that God has no problem with killing babies. He ordered the Jews to rip children out of the wombs of their defeated enemies. He killed plenty of children during the flood, AND he sacrificed his own son.
So, where do you get the idea that God has a problem with sacrificing babies?
@WhiteStar11111 It doesn't matter what Christ asked anyone. If you believe the Bible to be true, then your God ordered the slaughter of innocent women and children. Hell, he drowned almost every living thing on the planet at one time if you believe the bible; don't you think there were one or two babies crawling around at the time?
"that's Old Testament" is the silliest argument against the arcane and brutal laws that you're supposed to believe were handed down by a loving God. I laugh.
@WhiteStar11111 Oh ok, so we can throw out everything in it right? That means no Adam and Eve, no Noah's Ark, no 10 commandments, no messiah prophecies, no God creating the heavens and Earth. Just the Jesus story.
Oh, and no original sin, making Jesus' crucifixion pointless. Thanks for playing.
Easy to win when you debate yourself isn't it? Congratulations, you've just argued with the only person you can out-debate, namely the one in your mirror.
@WhiteStar11111 Sorry, your post has no points in it that refute anything I have said. I know you're probably mad because you have no answer for any of my arguments, but that's no reason to duck and dodge and hide behind a flippant comment with zero substance to it.
Christianity's roots are in the Old Testament. Again, Jesus' resurrection is not needed for human salvation without original sin. Guess where original sin comes from, genius. Try a counterargument next time instead of running.
You'd have to make a coherent argument for it to be refuted.
That said, your basic premise is that everyone else has to accept the package of positions that you put forth, even as you rail that some elements of that package contradict others.
You appear to need to scream at hypocrisy, to the extent that you'll create the appearance of such hypocrisy where none actually exists.
No. Are the roots of water in fire? A thing's antithesis is not it's source. You parrot the most-repeated myth in the last 2,000 years of religious history.
"Jesus' resurrection is not needed for human salvation without original sin."
Also false. If it's accepted that Adam and Eve never existed, people remain imperfect, needing a bridge / Savior.
@WhiteStar11111 Answer me one question then. If the Old Testament is a DIFFERENT RELIGION and has NOTHING to do with Christianity, then why does the Christian bible always include the OT? For the lolz?
@WhiteStar11111 My guess is that you have either never read the bible, are a Poe, or you've read it and missed major parts of it. A blind man could see that the New Testament is dependent on the Old Testament. It lists Jesus' genealogy back to David for Christ's sake, no pun intended.
Also, the New Testament quotes the Old Testament. JESUS quotes the Old Testament. Are you serious? Saying that the Old Testament has nothing to do with Christianity is..just...wrong.
You WANT to bind the two together, because doing sop suits your purposes.
So those who wanted to bind the two tossed in some made-up genealogy and quotes so future readers would feel compelled to buy an OT-inclusive package deal.
@WhiteStar11111 "“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the prophets. I have not come to abolish but to fulfill.”
Right from the New Testament. Quoting Jesus. I mean, have you read the book of Matthew at all? The beginning goes to great pains to Jesus being the Christ who would fufill the OT prophecies.
Sorry, you're simply wrong, and I really think you're a Poe/troll at this point because nobody could be this far off for real.
@WhiteStar11111 And so did every other author of the New Testament. Thanks for proving that believing that anything in the NT is anything but a man made fairy tale is retarded.
@rafaelkafka Well Moses' rules were supposedly handed down from God either way. God ordered the massacres of innocent women and children if we're to believe the Bible. In fact he supposedly slaughtered every living thing on the planet in a flood one time because he was mad at everyone.
@rafaelkafka But even if you want to throw out the entire Old Testament, the whole idea behind Jesus is ludicrous. God supposedly created the universe and decides all of the rules, correct? So how is it even feasible for a loving and all powerful God to ever decide that the best course of action for saving humans (from his own punishment, and because of a nature that he instilled in them) is to require a bloody human/godly sacrifice?
One small mind trashing another. Honestly, I could care less what some anti-intellectual religious hypocrite thinks abour aother. They both need to be thrown off the train, preferrably on the next track.
Just another FOX/WABC Neocon whore. She talks conservative but what is really sacred to her is War for OIL and Israel. I dont believe the govt/media lie about 911. You tube WTC 7 collapse and it is obvious there were explosives in the buildings.
What is so funny about her shallowness is every 5 minutes she goes on about her Catholicism to give herself holy airs yet she never seems to notice her precious Popes, both of them, were against the War in Iraq.
lol...its so funny that the far right has john mccain jammed down their throats now!!...it tells me that the neocons and hard right wingers have lost their grip on the republican party...and that is great!!!
Laura Ingraham is an idiot who has gotten to where's she's at because she's blonde and good-looking and has a big, big mouth and spews any hateful thing and it's ok because she's conservative and that's what conservatives are all about: say hateful distorted lies with authority and the sheep will believe.
This country was built from the ideals of conservatism. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, etc... The biggest liberal of all was Adolf Hitler who believed the government should control everything. Obviously you don't know you ass from your face when it comes to political ideologies.
The framers of the Constitution were actually influenced by classical liberalism. Liberalism is a philosophy that has brought the most reform and progressive change to millions of people, making their lives better. Hitler was a follower of nazism, a corruption of socialism, which really was similar to fascism, where neo-conservatism is heading. The Limbuaghs of our country are nourishing the ground for an American Hitler and you don't even see it.
You could not be more wrong. Unbelievable how you've swallowed the pill of socialism! This 'neo-conservativism' that you dolts who simply blindly follow as sheep-for-slaughter, repeat endlessly- as your gods have brain-washed you to believe instead of having a mind to think with, is total folly. This change is all about controlling all. We were founded on the premise of individualism. Read some accurate history; if your liberal-run Am. education hasn't removed ALL of your brain.
Besides name calling what intelligent contribution do you have to this discussion?
As for individualism, the Constitution of the US begins "WE THE PEOPLE." Where exactly do you get this idea about indidivualism and what does it have to do with Classical Liberalism--if you know what that means?
Isn't calling someone an "idiot" also a form of spewing hate? In which case you are guilty of doing the very thing you complain about Laura doing....it's kind of hypocritical.
Hey Laura, you're another one of those Legend In My Own Mind people. Born in '63 and you know more about what's best for the world than Ron Paul does. Don't worry, your whole world of running your yap on which you only THINK you know about will fall on deaf ears real soon! That's our prediction. Gouliani, A?
This country is bad enough off already, without you adding to it! You charge a membership? PLEASE!
It's not just that she's childless and unmarried...she also acts like a lesbian...Look at the pictures she puts up on her website(flying in fighter jets; biking in a triathalon; hanging out with her lab in a vest!) She's gay, gay, gay...I just can't believe someone that is such a bully and so busy sizing up everyone else doesn't have the courage to be honest about herself...
Laura Ingraham is not a social conservative, she's gay and in the closet...She talks like a man, she's middle aged and unmarried and childless, she's got a man's build, and man's face. Laura you are gay; you can't be conservative and be gay! LAURA OUT, spread the word.
being conservative doesn't depend on your sexuality. a true conservative is one who is favor of small government and self-reliance. this new conservativism was created to get Christian votes for non-Christian candidates.
Laura is a Christian conservative...Leviticus couldn't be any clearer: Homosexuality is wrong. THat's what it says...and conservatives are neither self reliant nor small government...look at how much money they have spent under Bush and look at them clamoring for giveaways from Romney and Huckabee...conservatives WANT to be self reliant, but they aren't
Laura Ingram is so HYPOCRITICAL. She seems to be stunned and extremely worried that Obama has surged in the polls and will probably win. She appears to be highly prejudiced and hate black people.
She's just a Neo Con that's brainwashed. I don't agree with hyporcrites either. Some hypocrites want free speech, but hate free speech done by religious folks. Some hypocrites talk about freedom, but don't want freedom shown by the unborn. Some yell about pushing religion on people, but most conservative religious people don't agree with that inspite on how anti-religious views are pushed on them.
I supported Rudy until he went and got Pat Robertsoms support. I am not voting for a republican for the first time in my 60 years because of the fundamentalist religious that is trying to kidnap the party to spread their weird religion and the NEO CONS. Both or equally evil.
There are many ways that Rudy fits within the social conservative agenda. On the life issue, for example: he supports the Hyde amendment, he is against partial birth abortion, he will appoint good judges, he supports the Mexico city policy, etc. Laura looks at abortion as binary, when it is not!
The funny part is that Laura is too dumb to know that this whole point is mute. Giuliani is going to get his clocked clean by Hillary, if he even gets the GOP nomination....which is doubtfull.
Robertson endorsing Giuliani just shows the hypocrisy of the religious right. They don't care about morals, they care about power. Pat Roberston is a business man and a friend of Rupert Murdoch, he's more concerned about saving dollars than 'souls'. Giuliani is pro-gay and pro-choice. The only thing in common with Robertson is that they are both pro-business.
The problem is not the religion it is trying to push the fundamental believes on everyone. The creation science and all the false history along with that. What these people fail to see is that stopping them from oppressing you is not oppressing them.
not really...she is just another loud mouth government shill to make americans focus on a left-right paradigm. She is just a female version of bill o' reilly...another bully. Enough with the left/right bullshit.
According to firefighters the tower rubble was sold to an asphalt company and used to pave the roads of New York. Rudy Giuliani for president 08' This guy really knows how to recycle!
Yeah, like I'm going to vote for Giuliani because Pat Robertson endorses him. Robertson also wants Chavez assassinated. Maybe there's a hidden message in there.
I dont think the endorsement will do as much to help Rudy as it will hurt Pat. It looks like exactly what it is. Afterall, how can someone preach so strongly against important social issues like abortion and homosexuality then support someone who's pro-choice/pro-gay and expect anyone to take them seriously again?
What a joke....how can u year in year out preach about abotion, and how immoral it is. And know tell the people you were preaching to vote for a pro abortion candidate. I guess he will say, without life, there's no point of having morals, and thats what will happen if you dont vote for Rudy, and with hillary as a leader the terorist will kill all of us. It's funny what fear can make us do.
I don't see Democrats or Republicans anymore. What I see is a gang of criminals who are destroying the U.S. with their practice of selling law for money and favors. I mean if a thief breaks into your house and steals all your stuff do you stand around with the police and discuss whether the thief was a Democrat and Republican?
Robertson's endorsement isn't surprising — he's an astonishingly stupid man, and so making an astonishingly stupid choice in picking Giuliani is just another in a long list of astonishingly stupid statements. What's interesting was Giuliani's enthusiastic public embrace of Robertson's endorsement and the media's reaction.
I disagree w. her on much. But she's dead right about Pat Robertson's support of Giuliani: opportunism and hypocrisy. Thx Ms. Ingram for calling it for what it is.
Regardless of whether someone is staunchly pro-/anti-abortion or pro-/anti-gay marriage, if a stance based on principles is important, one shouldn't abandon them at the drop of a hat.
It just shows how the religious right has sold their soul to the Republican party. I thought their #1 issue was abortion and gays. Yet they endorse a pro-choice, pro-civil union candidate just for the sake of power. What conviction!
Tyler just because Pat Robertson is endorsing him does not mean that every Christian is going to vote for Rudy. I for damn sure will not vote for Rudy. Obviously Robertson must of lost his morals.
I'm a Christian and have never liked what the RR has done. They are a bunch of judgemental hypocrits and should be ashamed of the image they portray of us. I think this shows thier true colors, as all they care about is power.
Yes I agree, If someone like Pat Robertson can endorse someone that is Pro-Choice and supports gay marriage than obviously he is NOT a true Christian. I am also a Christian and my morals come before anything when voting.
I believe there is a greater problem with the RR in that they have only focused on those issues. They have done nothing to attack issues of poverty or healthcare- which I believe were central in Christ message. And if they were to pick a #1 issue, outside of "love for others" Christ spoke more about caring for the poor and the sick then he ever did on the issue of homosexuality. They are showing their true colors.
She is a dumb cunt but then she falls right into the right wing women empty headed. I bet she has pulled many a train at the Republicans convention. No one has taken this clown Robertson serious for years. He has grabed his ankles one to many times
Funny how you only watched one video on Youtube ever. Your a tool. Nice ad Hominem attack too. You always get great conversation with one of those. A person of any brain whatsoever knows thats the attack of a mindless looser. F off
Oh yeah, Pat Robertson just proved, he too has been a tool for all these years by endorsing crime-boss-son-pro-child-killing Guliani(sp). Hes a fraud and a joke for going against what he preached for years.
I will think of you when the Dem's win back the White House in that you and your Republicans sold to the highest bidder. To bad that you can't see the forest for the trees. Have a nice day
Yeah, but I dont think she would be too happy with you having a "Crazy Brizilian Chick" vid on your channel. I think she sees that as the sexualization of America. I'm reporting you.
Pat Robertson endorsed Rudy Giuliani because Robertson's #1 issue is Israel.
Kneeling before the altar of Israel, he is willing to sacrifice babies to abortion by endorsing a pro-abortion politician like Giuliani.
RichKnight2010 1 year ago
@RichKnight2010 Well Robertson loves the Bible. If you actually read the bible, you'll see that God has no problem with killing babies. He ordered the Jews to rip children out of the wombs of their defeated enemies. He killed plenty of children during the flood, AND he sacrificed his own son.
So, where do you get the idea that God has a problem with sacrificing babies?
RockBanned 1 year ago
@RockBanned
What you reference is Old Testament.
Christ never asked anyone to do anything like that.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@WhiteStar11111 It doesn't matter what Christ asked anyone. If you believe the Bible to be true, then your God ordered the slaughter of innocent women and children. Hell, he drowned almost every living thing on the planet at one time if you believe the bible; don't you think there were one or two babies crawling around at the time?
"that's Old Testament" is the silliest argument against the arcane and brutal laws that you're supposed to believe were handed down by a loving God. I laugh.
RockBanned 7 months ago
@RockBanned
The Old Testament is a different religion entirely.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@WhiteStar11111 Oh ok, so we can throw out everything in it right? That means no Adam and Eve, no Noah's Ark, no 10 commandments, no messiah prophecies, no God creating the heavens and Earth. Just the Jesus story.
Oh, and no original sin, making Jesus' crucifixion pointless. Thanks for playing.
RockBanned 7 months ago
@RockBanned
Easy to win when you debate yourself isn't it? Congratulations, you've just argued with the only person you can out-debate, namely the one in your mirror.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@WhiteStar11111 Sorry, your post has no points in it that refute anything I have said. I know you're probably mad because you have no answer for any of my arguments, but that's no reason to duck and dodge and hide behind a flippant comment with zero substance to it.
Christianity's roots are in the Old Testament. Again, Jesus' resurrection is not needed for human salvation without original sin. Guess where original sin comes from, genius. Try a counterargument next time instead of running.
RockBanned 7 months ago
@RockBanned
You'd have to make a coherent argument for it to be refuted.
That said, your basic premise is that everyone else has to accept the package of positions that you put forth, even as you rail that some elements of that package contradict others.
You appear to need to scream at hypocrisy, to the extent that you'll create the appearance of such hypocrisy where none actually exists.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
Comment removed
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@RockBanned
"Christianity's roots are in the Old Testament."
No. Are the roots of water in fire? A thing's antithesis is not it's source. You parrot the most-repeated myth in the last 2,000 years of religious history.
"Jesus' resurrection is not needed for human salvation without original sin."
Also false. If it's accepted that Adam and Eve never existed, people remain imperfect, needing a bridge / Savior.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@WhiteStar11111 Answer me one question then. If the Old Testament is a DIFFERENT RELIGION and has NOTHING to do with Christianity, then why does the Christian bible always include the OT? For the lolz?
RockBanned 7 months ago
@RockBanned
Now there's a valid question.
First, it's inclusion doesn't make it's inclusion correct.
That said, perhaps early officials wanted to rely on inculcating fear, and the OT served that purpose.
Perhaps they felt that they had to have creation stories of some kind.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@WhiteStar11111 My guess is that you have either never read the bible, are a Poe, or you've read it and missed major parts of it. A blind man could see that the New Testament is dependent on the Old Testament. It lists Jesus' genealogy back to David for Christ's sake, no pun intended.
Also, the New Testament quotes the Old Testament. JESUS quotes the Old Testament. Are you serious? Saying that the Old Testament has nothing to do with Christianity is..just...wrong.
RockBanned 7 months ago
@RockBanned
You WANT to bind the two together, because doing sop suits your purposes.
So those who wanted to bind the two tossed in some made-up genealogy and quotes so future readers would feel compelled to buy an OT-inclusive package deal.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WhiteStar11111 "“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the prophets. I have not come to abolish but to fulfill.”
Right from the New Testament. Quoting Jesus. I mean, have you read the book of Matthew at all? The beginning goes to great pains to Jesus being the Christ who would fufill the OT prophecies.
Sorry, you're simply wrong, and I really think you're a Poe/troll at this point because nobody could be this far off for real.
RockBanned 7 months ago
@RockBanned
Matthew had an agenda, and was willing to do anything to pursue that agenda.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@WhiteStar11111 And so did every other author of the New Testament. Thanks for proving that believing that anything in the NT is anything but a man made fairy tale is retarded.
RockBanned 7 months ago
@RockBanned
History books are written through the lens of the writer's agenda.
That doesn't in any way shape or form disprove the history having happened.
WhiteStar11111 7 months ago
@RockBanned For historic purposes, moron. Jesus ended Moses rules. Any literate person knows that.
rafaelkafka 1 month ago
@rafaelkafka Well Moses' rules were supposedly handed down from God either way. God ordered the massacres of innocent women and children if we're to believe the Bible. In fact he supposedly slaughtered every living thing on the planet in a flood one time because he was mad at everyone.
RockBanned 1 month ago
@rafaelkafka But even if you want to throw out the entire Old Testament, the whole idea behind Jesus is ludicrous. God supposedly created the universe and decides all of the rules, correct? So how is it even feasible for a loving and all powerful God to ever decide that the best course of action for saving humans (from his own punishment, and because of a nature that he instilled in them) is to require a bloody human/godly sacrifice?
RockBanned 1 month ago
Say....what?
ensconse 1 year ago
One small mind trashing another. Honestly, I could care less what some anti-intellectual religious hypocrite thinks abour aother. They both need to be thrown off the train, preferrably on the next track.
jakefree25 3 years ago
laura ingraham and pat robertson should swallow the stuff under the sink
elea1885 3 years ago
Just another FOX/WABC Neocon whore. She talks conservative but what is really sacred to her is War for OIL and Israel. I dont believe the govt/media lie about 911. You tube WTC 7 collapse and it is obvious there were explosives in the buildings.
KENA429 3 years ago
What is so funny about her shallowness is every 5 minutes she goes on about her Catholicism to give herself holy airs yet she never seems to notice her precious Popes, both of them, were against the War in Iraq.
jakefree25 3 years ago
You're right!!!
christinew78 3 years ago
Pat Robertson is a butt fucking fagot who forced Marry to Lick the Shit off of his dick before he fucked her face.
aarono12345 3 years ago 2
you must be a blast to hang out with....
breakfastisready 3 years ago
lol...its so funny that the far right has john mccain jammed down their throats now!!...it tells me that the neocons and hard right wingers have lost their grip on the republican party...and that is great!!!
jtw2278 3 years ago 2
This may be translated by many as me being a "snob".
Personally, I will call it... "I seem to be a "needy person".and always depend on others judgment to make a decision.
This is one good reason why I appear to be snob lacking a sense of humor in others people eyes.
HlLLARYCLINTON 3 years ago
Pat Robertson is nutcase!
Laura Ingrham RULES.
Max8Jizzy 4 years ago
Laura Ingraham is an idiot who has gotten to where's she's at because she's blonde and good-looking and has a big, big mouth and spews any hateful thing and it's ok because she's conservative and that's what conservatives are all about: say hateful distorted lies with authority and the sheep will believe.
JLTopa 4 years ago
This country was built from the ideals of conservatism. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, etc... The biggest liberal of all was Adolf Hitler who believed the government should control everything. Obviously you don't know you ass from your face when it comes to political ideologies.
a3patriot 3 years ago
The framers of the Constitution were actually influenced by classical liberalism. Liberalism is a philosophy that has brought the most reform and progressive change to millions of people, making their lives better. Hitler was a follower of nazism, a corruption of socialism, which really was similar to fascism, where neo-conservatism is heading. The Limbuaghs of our country are nourishing the ground for an American Hitler and you don't even see it.
JLTopa 3 years ago
You could not be more wrong. Unbelievable how you've swallowed the pill of socialism! This 'neo-conservativism' that you dolts who simply blindly follow as sheep-for-slaughter, repeat endlessly- as your gods have brain-washed you to believe instead of having a mind to think with, is total folly. This change is all about controlling all. We were founded on the premise of individualism. Read some accurate history; if your liberal-run Am. education hasn't removed ALL of your brain.
kickyerass 3 years ago
Besides name calling what intelligent contribution do you have to this discussion?
As for individualism, the Constitution of the US begins "WE THE PEOPLE." Where exactly do you get this idea about indidivualism and what does it have to do with Classical Liberalism--if you know what that means?
JLTopa 3 years ago
Isn't calling someone an "idiot" also a form of spewing hate? In which case you are guilty of doing the very thing you complain about Laura doing....it's kind of hypocritical.
fde1972 3 years ago
Idiot is as idiot does.
JLTopa 3 years ago
She didn't say one word criticizing what Pat Robertson said.
She also seemed like she didn't respect him. The coarsening of our culture afflicts both the left and the right.
keithcu2 4 years ago
Yeah the bitch knows her fucking party is gonna lose in 08. I guess that's why she has a job now being a cunt on Fox News.
spaceorbison 4 years ago
Hey Laura, you're another one of those Legend In My Own Mind people. Born in '63 and you know more about what's best for the world than Ron Paul does. Don't worry, your whole world of running your yap on which you only THINK you know about will fall on deaf ears real soon! That's our prediction. Gouliani, A?
This country is bad enough off already, without you adding to it! You charge a membership? PLEASE!
coopercussion 4 years ago
strizen....so, by what you say is that any woman that is middle age and not married is....gay? You're a child. Grow up.
Laura Ingraham is great.
RaePet 4 years ago 3
It's not just that she's childless and unmarried...she also acts like a lesbian...Look at the pictures she puts up on her website(flying in fighter jets; biking in a triathalon; hanging out with her lab in a vest!) She's gay, gay, gay...I just can't believe someone that is such a bully and so busy sizing up everyone else doesn't have the courage to be honest about herself...
strizen 4 years ago
Laura Ingraham is not a social conservative, she's gay and in the closet...She talks like a man, she's middle aged and unmarried and childless, she's got a man's build, and man's face. Laura you are gay; you can't be conservative and be gay! LAURA OUT, spread the word.
strizen 4 years ago
being conservative doesn't depend on your sexuality. a true conservative is one who is favor of small government and self-reliance. this new conservativism was created to get Christian votes for non-Christian candidates.
rizinirish08 4 years ago
Laura is a Christian conservative...Leviticus couldn't be any clearer: Homosexuality is wrong. THat's what it says...and conservatives are neither self reliant nor small government...look at how much money they have spent under Bush and look at them clamoring for giveaways from Romney and Huckabee...conservatives WANT to be self reliant, but they aren't
strizen 4 years ago
The GOP is struggling financially in the presidential race now.
ffairlane57 4 years ago
Laura Ingram is so HYPOCRITICAL. She seems to be stunned and extremely worried that Obama has surged in the polls and will probably win. She appears to be highly prejudiced and hate black people.
RAJINN56 4 years ago
She's just a Neo Con that's brainwashed. I don't agree with hyporcrites either. Some hypocrites want free speech, but hate free speech done by religious folks. Some hypocrites talk about freedom, but don't want freedom shown by the unborn. Some yell about pushing religion on people, but most conservative religious people don't agree with that inspite on how anti-religious views are pushed on them.
TruthSeeker24 4 years ago
Isn't Pat Robertson the one who claimed his God told him their would be massive killings in the United States in 2007 by terrorists?
This guy is a complete fraud. I'm not surprised he supports Rudy.
UncleRico13 4 years ago
I supported Rudy until he went and got Pat Robertsoms support. I am not voting for a republican for the first time in my 60 years because of the fundamentalist religious that is trying to kidnap the party to spread their weird religion and the NEO CONS. Both or equally evil.
Cuffsmaster 4 years ago
Google Ron Paul.
He's our only hope.
amwedin 4 years ago
Damn -- Ron Paul supports are getting worse than Jahovahs Witnesses. He is not the answer --
Cuffsmaster 4 years ago 2
For whom are you voting?
amwedin 4 years ago
HA - he's the ONLY answer. This country is very sick right now, and we need a doctor.
Dr. Ron Paul, that is.
balosfan2189 4 years ago
Laura is smart, but not always right.
There are many ways that Rudy fits within the social conservative agenda. On the life issue, for example: he supports the Hyde amendment, he is against partial birth abortion, he will appoint good judges, he supports the Mexico city policy, etc. Laura looks at abortion as binary, when it is not!
keithcu2 4 years ago
I love Laura Ingraham! She is right on. She didn't say this but I think that Pat is a bigot
LOUETTA12 4 years ago
The funny part is that Laura is too dumb to know that this whole point is mute. Giuliani is going to get his clocked clean by Hillary, if he even gets the GOP nomination....which is doubtfull.
WestSideHK 4 years ago
Laura has more intelligence in her little pinky than you have in your whole body, moron...
Thirdgen83 4 years ago
Robertson endorsing Giuliani just shows the hypocrisy of the religious right. They don't care about morals, they care about power. Pat Roberston is a business man and a friend of Rupert Murdoch, he's more concerned about saving dollars than 'souls'. Giuliani is pro-gay and pro-choice. The only thing in common with Robertson is that they are both pro-business.
Disconcerted68 4 years ago
robertson's just one person. He doesn't make the whole religous right hypocritical.
prsnintheusa 4 years ago
The problem is not the religion it is trying to push the fundamental believes on everyone. The creation science and all the false history along with that. What these people fail to see is that stopping them from oppressing you is not oppressing them.
Cuffsmaster 4 years ago
Laura Ingraham rocks!! The left wing liberals experience a stomach ache when they see her! ha ha.
frfrok 4 years ago
not really...she is just another loud mouth government shill to make americans focus on a left-right paradigm. She is just a female version of bill o' reilly...another bully. Enough with the left/right bullshit.
avoozl07 4 years ago
According to firefighters the tower rubble was sold to an asphalt company and used to pave the roads of New York. Rudy Giuliani for president 08' This guy really knows how to recycle!
treksterj 4 years ago 3
first time i have ever agreed with this devil woman
svahdat 4 years ago
Pat Robertson is a has been who is hanging on for dear life to the remnants of his power.
Giuliani is an never was who is so unscrupulous that he has the blessing of the power brokers.
A match made in...
ewetoobee 4 years ago 3
Yeah, like I'm going to vote for Giuliani because Pat Robertson endorses him. Robertson also wants Chavez assassinated. Maybe there's a hidden message in there.
84kedld0f9gh 4 years ago 4
how about throw them both off the train at 110mph.
kevgrim 4 years ago 6
Rudy has had a few drag moments. Im talking FULL drag, hair, makeup...the works. All in all PR is and has always been...a hypocrite.
siletsoldier1 4 years ago
I dont think the endorsement will do as much to help Rudy as it will hurt Pat. It looks like exactly what it is. Afterall, how can someone preach so strongly against important social issues like abortion and homosexuality then support someone who's pro-choice/pro-gay and expect anyone to take them seriously again?
mrwhiteconservative 4 years ago
RON PAUL 2008!!!
georgio316 4 years ago 4
@georgio316 Yeah, how'd that work out
RockBanned 1 year ago
What a joke....how can u year in year out preach about abotion, and how immoral it is. And know tell the people you were preaching to vote for a pro abortion candidate. I guess he will say, without life, there's no point of having morals, and thats what will happen if you dont vote for Rudy, and with hillary as a leader the terorist will kill all of us. It's funny what fear can make us do.
rishbademha 4 years ago 3
I don't see Democrats or Republicans anymore. What I see is a gang of criminals who are destroying the U.S. with their practice of selling law for money and favors. I mean if a thief breaks into your house and steals all your stuff do you stand around with the police and discuss whether the thief was a Democrat and Republican?
Obobbakonda 4 years ago 4
Of all the candidates that Pat could have endorsed. I'm appalled beyond logical reasoning; my poor brain is parched for want of an explanation!
It's as if Pat Robertson deliberately wanted to sabotage the Republican Party image which is already in shambles because of Bush.
ya4sure4sure 4 years ago
Robertson's endorsement isn't surprising — he's an astonishingly stupid man, and so making an astonishingly stupid choice in picking Giuliani is just another in a long list of astonishingly stupid statements. What's interesting was Giuliani's enthusiastic public embrace of Robertson's endorsement and the media's reaction.
getplaning 4 years ago
I disagree w. her on much. But she's dead right about Pat Robertson's support of Giuliani: opportunism and hypocrisy. Thx Ms. Ingram for calling it for what it is.
Regardless of whether someone is staunchly pro-/anti-abortion or pro-/anti-gay marriage, if a stance based on principles is important, one shouldn't abandon them at the drop of a hat.
4dr3n41in3 4 years ago
ffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuucccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkk Giuiani!!!!!!!!!
yayarea41507 4 years ago
It just shows how the religious right has sold their soul to the Republican party. I thought their #1 issue was abortion and gays. Yet they endorse a pro-choice, pro-civil union candidate just for the sake of power. What conviction!
tylerdurden790 4 years ago
Tyler just because Pat Robertson is endorsing him does not mean that every Christian is going to vote for Rudy. I for damn sure will not vote for Rudy. Obviously Robertson must of lost his morals.
conservative44 4 years ago 2
I'm a Christian and have never liked what the RR has done. They are a bunch of judgemental hypocrits and should be ashamed of the image they portray of us. I think this shows thier true colors, as all they care about is power.
tylerdurden790 4 years ago 2
Yes I agree, If someone like Pat Robertson can endorse someone that is Pro-Choice and supports gay marriage than obviously he is NOT a true Christian. I am also a Christian and my morals come before anything when voting.
conservative44 4 years ago
I believe there is a greater problem with the RR in that they have only focused on those issues. They have done nothing to attack issues of poverty or healthcare- which I believe were central in Christ message. And if they were to pick a #1 issue, outside of "love for others" Christ spoke more about caring for the poor and the sick then he ever did on the issue of homosexuality. They are showing their true colors.
tylerdurden790 4 years ago
She is a dumb cunt but then she falls right into the right wing women empty headed. I bet she has pulled many a train at the Republicans convention. No one has taken this clown Robertson serious for years. He has grabed his ankles one to many times
RetMarineviews 4 years ago
Funny how you only watched one video on Youtube ever. Your a tool. Nice ad Hominem attack too. You always get great conversation with one of those. A person of any brain whatsoever knows thats the attack of a mindless looser. F off
socarfiat 4 years ago
Oh yeah, Pat Robertson just proved, he too has been a tool for all these years by endorsing crime-boss-son-pro-child-killing Guliani(sp). Hes a fraud and a joke for going against what he preached for years.
socarfiat 4 years ago
I will think of you when the Dem's win back the White House in that you and your Republicans sold to the highest bidder. To bad that you can't see the forest for the trees. Have a nice day
RetMarineviews 4 years ago
Politics. Where else would find those two together? Thumbs up for Laura Ingraham.
33115566 4 years ago
i would kick this trenchbull in the head.
mcalien24 4 years ago
Pat Robertson is just a zionist little bitch.
Sclorch 4 years ago
She is nothing but a braindead fucktard just like all you chickenshit repugs. As for the Pat and Rudy show,who cares.
blair227 4 years ago
Not only is she beautiful but she's smart too. I love Laura Ingram.
luomio 4 years ago 2
Yeah, but I dont think she would be too happy with you having a "Crazy Brizilian Chick" vid on your channel. I think she sees that as the sexualization of America. I'm reporting you.
tylerdurden790 4 years ago