Danny Jowenko 9/11 interview WTC 7 [An Unwilling Truther Guru]

[UK31337]

I should add that his opinions are based on one very short video clip which has been edited to support the truthers' position. I've seen other footage and independent photographs taken from across the Hudson River which shows the front of WTC7 gouged out and the building leaning forwards.

WTC7 collapsed basically because the internal structure failed horizontally and the walls were unsupported. The low booms beforehand were probably part of the internal structure crashing to the ground.

[UK31337]

Yup, the Danny Jowenko WTC7 comments are always taken out of context. The short clip the truthers keep showing you misrepresents his opinions and what he actually said.

Then he goes and dies in a tragic but perfectly easy to explain car accident and people claim he was silenced by the CIA because he spoke out. What absolute nonsense - plenty of other people have made the exact same claims and are still alive.

[Weirdo10o4]

Leave out the east penthouse... no wonder he thought it was a controlled demolition. Leave out the fact it caused 1.7 billion in damages to other structures and that it didn't collapse evenly.

[danp5648]

at 17:16 in the uncut version watch?v=0ZyCCpXNPbw he DOES NOT REPLY in the way you say he does. He reply was "for me it is little bit watching coffee dregs" which I have no idea what he means.

[911SanityandRespect]

@danp5648 Well, if you kept watching, Jowenko explains what he means by 'for me it is a little bit watching coffee dregs'. He says it RIGHT AFTER.

"I mean, that is not a lot of information"

So what do you mean by 'he does not reply in the way you say he does'?

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?

[911SanityandRespect]

@ctcole77 3 of many questions truthers don't want you to ask them lol.

[danp5648]

The full interview is 22 minutes long watch?v=0ZyCCpXNPbw uncut. then an edit happens and you assume he responding to that question.

[danp5648]

The full interview is 22 minutes long watch?v=0ZyCCpXNPbw uncut.

[999II0OlllO0II666]

So-called "9/11 truthers" think the truth is too boring, so they focus on anomalous opinions and promote these out-of-context minority views to make their boring lives more interesting... Pearl Harbor foresight... JFK... moon hoax... 2000 stolen election... Illuminati NWO... 9/11 inside job... BLA BLA BLA BLA

Grow up, k?

[sr71ablackbird]

@999II0OlllO0II666 you really believe so ? that must be why Danny Jowenko is dead now, right ? I believe you're the one that needs to grow a pair, pal, the guy above did, and now, he's dead.

[999II0OlllO0II666]

@sr71ablackbird What does him being dead have to do with anything? EVERYTHING is not a conspiracy, pal. Accidents happen. People die. Even non-"truthers"...

Grow up.

[sr71ablackbird]

@999II0OlllO0II666 it's apparent that you are a real expert on telling others to grow up, isn't it ? tell ya what pal, why don't you grow up some. There is more to that than what you know. one clue pal, do your history. it is NOT confined to the textbooks of high schools and colleges.

[sr71ablackbird]

@999II0OlllO0II666 btw, i'm NOT your pal, but that is pretty good of you to notice, especially seeing that more or less you go on trolling on here but you need, the following to know how to troll ? "The Troll's Guide To YouTube" (In Four Volumes, 3rd Edition), that's speaks volumes within itself, are you some type of paid provocateur ?

[911SanityandRespect]

@sr71ablackbird More inane conspiracy talk!!! When people don't agree with truthers, those people are of course some sort of paid agent for the GOV/FBI/CIA/ISI/FDA or one of the many dark, mysterious groups that lurk in the shadows.

It is more fun that way, right? And it makes you think less, that helps too.

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect the only one here besides you is that 999 that thinks less, eventually you have NOT done your history, so start hitting the history books also, kiddo, because there is a hell of alot more that goes one behind the scenes that you don't know about or our country here for that matter, . Let me take a stab in the dark, you are one of those paid provocateurs also ? so who is it ? CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, MSNBC, CBC ?

[sr71ablackbird]

Respond to this video... wrong,. the only paid agent here is you !!!!, so tell me, who is it that pays you and your trolling buddy above ?

[911SanityandRespect]

@sr71ablackbird So sad. Everyone who doesn't think space lasers, holographic planes and thermite caused 9/11 is a paid agent to you truthers. Another ridiculous theory, with absolutely no proof.



[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect who stated anything about holographic planes ? I sure as hell didn't . and where is your proof ? I do know this much, that it takes a hell of alot more the melt that damned steel than what the original story says as reported by the media. Have you ever worked in a foundry ? I have and melted down aluminum and the ONLY way that you are going to get that shit to melt is with what is called a controlled burn. and it takes 2,700 F just to melt aluminum. which is a hell of alot

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect easier to melt than steel, it's melted in what is called a graphite crucible & the heat is measured by what is called a pyrometer that is stuck into the molten aluminum to measure the heat. Steel , anykind for that matter takes at least 3,000 + to melt because it's a mixture of metals and NOT just a single metal itself. As for that b/s story that they gave you about the fuel - JP4 aka K2 Kerosene which is used to fuel the aircraft does NOT get that hot.

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect If one had ever been to a fire demonstration at an AFB, one would know that, they douse an a aluminum aircraft shell with the JP-4 aka K-2 Kerosene and let it sit & ignite it. though the heat is intense, it is NOT enough to melt the aircraft shell. It can sit for 30 minutes or more engulfed in flames & still have no damage to it, because it's in what is called an open-air environment which doesn't allow for it to reach it's melting point. After that, it's extinguished with

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect what is called Hyex Foam

[911SanityandRespect]

@sr71ablackbird None of that has anything to do with the planes hitting the buildings and the damage that was caused by it.

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect well, you should know that in the `offial report', that jet fuel was supposed to have brought those towers down, and i'm telling you from personal experience from working with metal , that the offical story is a plain lie in iteself.

[911SanityandRespect]

@sr71ablackbird LOL...No where in the official report did it say that jet fuel brought down the towers. That is moronic.

The impact from the planes, and the fires that started because of both the impact and the jet fuel contributed to the fall of the towers. Structural damage from the initial impact, and steel that had lost half of its strength from raging fires.

Planes hit buildings, buildings fall.

You should go back and actually read the official report.

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect and you should do your metallurgy some more. If you have ever spent any time at a foundry at all, then you would know was well as i do, it would take what is called a 'controled envoriment' to do that, & NOT an open-air enviroment. At the least, it takes 2700+ in a controlled enviroment just to melt aluminum which the temperature is measured by what is called a pyrometer which is inserted into what is called a graphite crucible which the aluminum is melted in. It takes ...

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect over 3000 F to melt steel, far from what you have described, and you would known that if you had paid attention to what i have stated before. go back, read and read it. How do I know all of this? I learned this from experience based in a foundry in a metal shop and members of the Air Force. K-2 Kerosene, would NOT get hot enough to melt that steel, let alone the aluminum that of which the aircraft was made of. Just be lucky that the fuel that was mentioned was NOT JP-8

[911SanityandRespect]

@sr71ablackbird Yet again, a truther babbles on about 'melting steel'.

And yet again, someone has to tell them that no one claims the steel melted. The steel had lost half its strength due the fires, which started from a really big plane smashing into the building (which of course caused much structural damage to begin with).

The steel did not need to melt. So stop talking about melted steel. It has nothing nothing to do with 9/11.

[sr71ablackbird]

@911SanityandRespect yet, the building was built to stand the impact of an aircraft of such, why not tell that to the first responders that were down there and saw it with their own eyes, they even stated that there was melted flowing steel down there ?!?!?!?

[999II0OlllO0II666]

@sr71ablackbird I work for an organization called LOL. Our main directive is to laugh at humorless conspirashnooks like you.

btw, you said I WAS your pal first... Read your original post, pal.

Reality is boring, ey? Spice it up with conspiracy theories... you'll feel more important for "discovering" them. Then expect more LOL from pals like me!

[999II0OlllO0II666]

@sr71ablackbird <-----L way OL!!! So now your saying that Abraham Lincoln knew about the 9/11 conspiracy too?? Ya think your quote is just a BIT out of context? You're a cutting edge political thinker?... NOT!

AAAAAAH-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH­A HA HA HAAAA

AA-HAHAHAHAHAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAHAHA HA HA

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAaaaaa...

'Nuff already... move along assclown. B`bye.

BTW, the internal destruction to the Union is coming from conspiraspooks like YOU... a social termite.

[sr71ablackbird]

@999II0OlllO0II666 up your's ass clown, you're the troller, that's just history plain and simple. the only one here that's a social termite here is you, spreading your socialist nazi propaganda all over the damn place. We already had one socialist democratic leader in our time and look how that turned out ? you may have heard of him, his name was adolf hitler and look. The only one here that is a threat is yourself because you're too damned ignorant to do real history.

[sr71ablackbird]

@999II0OlllO0II666 Do NOT put words in my mouth. If you are so damned smart as you claim to be & did your real history, instead of needing a encyclopedia for trolling you would know exactly where this country was heading to. Thank you for the compliment on being a `cutting edge political thinker'. You are the only ass clown around. It's the neo-con republicans and the socialist democrats such as yourself that are an imminent danger to our Constitutionally-Limited republic of ours !!!

[sr71ablackbird]

@999II0OlllO0II666 no, you read my post, pal, i don't give a tinker's damn as to which ass-hat organization you belong to. you can threaten me with all of your lol pals all you want, but let me tell you this much, threats appeal to me more than they do most people, i thrive on threats towards me. you stupid clusterfuck.

[999II0OlllO0II666]

@sr71ablackbird Hey, you paranoid assclown... who's threatening you??

LOL = Laugh Out Loud. No threat there, you silly little troll.

On my channel I joke about being a troll... YOU really are one and you have no argument.

By the way, learn how to read... you're BORING me! I'm done with you.

[sr71ablackbird]

@999II0OlllO0II666 paranoid assclown, huh ? why don't you learn to read more ? the only reason i'm boring to you is that i present possibilities where you conform to the mainstream media of so-called scriptural truth. I could have a more intelligent debate with a blade of crab grass than i could with you, your lack of intelligence is astounding compared to that of a microbial spore.

[HomerbearReloaded]

/watch?v=RhgmRm3aiaY&feature=c­hannel_video_title

[911SanityandRespect]

@HomerbearReloaded At least have the decency to leave an actual message.  Not just a fkin link.

[OugaBoogaShockwave]

Any1 with the ability to use their head can see if this is the trueth or manifestations of madness.

Most ppl are busy doing what takes up their time & attention so it looks like an uphill fight trying to convince the majority to pay attention.

[lomejorpapi]

guys...a simple fire wouldn't bring a building that size down...especially from the bottom up (You've all seen FULLY CHARRED buildings still standing). No prior explosions? No massive fire bellowing from the windows? I don't think so.

I don't claim that I know what happened to the WTCs 1/2/7, but I know that I DON'T know everything, and that what is publicly reported isn't 100% true. #thatisall

[911SanityandRespect]

@lomejorpapi No, not a simple fire.

The collapse of the north tower heavily damaged WTC7. The damage weakened the structure. The multiple fires inside WTC7 were not being contained by either the sprinkler system (which was damaged) or by firefighters, who were told to evacuate. Those fires burned, unchecked for many hours. That combined with the structural damage caused by the collapse of the north tower was what brought WTC 7.

[lomejorpapi]

guys...a simple fire wouldn't bring a building that size down...especially from the bottom up (You've all seen FULLY CHARRED buildings still standing). No prior explosions? No massive fire bellowing from the windows? I don't think so.

I don't claim that I know what happened to the WTCs 1/2/7, but I know that I DON'T know everything, and that what is publicly reported isn't 100% true. #thatisall

[Born2Flesh]

Don't "Walk like an Egyptian", Shuffle like The 5 Dancing Israelis on 9/11!

[branni79]

u hav massively misinterpreted what they were saying and meaning!

The interviewer said could they have done the demolition prep and set up on the day after the planes struck or would it have to have been advanced prep and demolitions set up. mr jowenko explained what would be needed and how many men to do it on the day after the planes struck. then when the interviewer said the building fire was never extinguished it meant it had to have done in advance! ur full of shit!

[darthclaytor]

@branni79 You seem to be desperately trying to convince yourself of something.  I can't figure out what, but I hope you win.

[branni79]

@darthclaytor

no fella. u are misleading people with your rubbish as the meaning of that video conversation is the complete opposite of the crap your saying. Fools like you wont and cant, thanx to the internet, tell people that what their eyes see is wrong. That bullshit wont work no more. And as for desperate! Coming from an A1 wanker who has set up an entire youtube page devoted to telling others to believe in this bullshit government cover up. who do i believe - government or 9/11 emt's!

[darthclaytor]

@branni79 You will believe anything, except what really happened. That would be to boring. All the conspiracy theories are too much fun. Too bad they are just that, theories.

You are just another shill. COINTEL.

[xadam2dudex]

BS there weren't raging fires.. there were small fires in one side of the building.. it is a lie to say the building was burning out of control ..other witnesses in the building reported explosions from below

[911SanityandRespect]

@xadam2dudex You sir, are wrong.

There was extensive damage from debris from the twin towers. The sprinkler system was damage, so the fires burned unchecked.  There was concern the building might collapse, so all firefighters were pulled and the fires continued unchecked. As for the 'explosions', maybe that could have been the diesel generators located in the basement?

[xadam2dudex]

@911SanityandRespect u must be reading the propaganda sent out by the agents of disinformation... the WTC 7 building had a small amount of damage to one corner of the building but nothing that would be a serious threat to the building...there were no raging fires.. any fire was nothing more than office fires which do not produce heat great enough to even soften steel ..if u understood the dynamics of the collapse u wouldn't be spreading disinformation

[911SanityandRespect]

@xadam2dudex

You are obviously yet another lunatic twoother.

You haven't done any actual research. You don't even read what other people actual say. You just keep repeating the same uneducated generalized bullshite that has been debunked over and over again.

COINTEL loooove people like you. In fact, maybe you are COINTEL. If you aren't, then I feel even more sorry for you.

[911SanityandRespect]

@Egomaytrix If I could, I most definitely would.

[911SanityandRespect]

@Egomaytrix LOL one phone call that may or may not be legitimate.

Did you even watch that very short video about WTC 7? I assume not, since you didn't mention it.

You wanted an explanation, I gave it to you.

Enjoy the head-in-the-sand life!

[911SanityandRespect]

@Egomaytrix This poor guy gets asked to make an quick decision on a very complicated subject. He does the best he can, again reminding the interviewer that he doesn't have all the facts. Even with a lifetime of demolition experience, he cannot formulate a fully informed decision about a building collapse in a couple hours. Especially without vital information and research about the collapse.

Since that interview 911 truthers have been treating his comments as pure fact, without question.

[branni79]

@911SanityandRespect

your getting on my fuckin tits you stupid cunt. who do i believe an expert guy on a different continent who does not benefit financially from viewin a vid and giving an opion or a twat in his own country being paid to shut up and speak parrot fashion or face no future work for his company or death. who do i believe the emergency teams from 911 who say they witnessed and heard explosions and are now banned from the 10th anniverasry or a disinfo cunt like you!

[branni79]

@911SanityandRespect

that demolitions guy is now dead from an apparent car crash that was closed with no investigation. Like all the true witnesses of 9/11 who speak out they end up dead. so after doing years of research and listening to the bullshit one sided government owned news blurts and bullshit government owned tv corporations one sided programmes and watching and learning from the free information sites like youtube i know it was a fuckin inside job so fuck you!

[branni79]

@911SanityandRespect

i will not let a stooge like you tell me jack shit with your disinformation. I have an independant mind and make theoretical judgements based on evidence. its no coincidence we're (uk/usa) are bomb9ing the shit out of and taking control over countries that have a wealth of stuff our greedy countries want like oil and minerals/precious metals, opium. you dumb fuck thatyou cant see its the empire building domination over folks who have what they want.

[911SanityandRespect]

@Egomaytrix I wasn't attempting to offer an explanation. I was just pointing out that Mr. Jowenko's view on the fall of WTC 7 was not as absolute as many 911 truthers say it is.

He says many times in the full interview that he doesn't have all the information. He also reminds the interview (multiple times) that before that interview, he knew nothing of the fall of WTC 7.

[911SanityandRespect]

@911SanityandRespect If you really want an explanation on the collapse of WTC 7, check this video out:

watch?v=_kSq663m0G8