Added: 3 years ago
From: IllustraMedia
Views: 9,976
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You completely have no idea of what is natural selection. You pick and choose words you think can disprove science. Just because you read one chapter from a book doesn't mean you know everything. Miller tried to show us how life can form from inorganic molecules. Evolution already happened. We have visual evidence that a species can evolve. There's one that evolve different stomach just in 30 generations. You should see Craig Ventor's experiment. He showed us that we can make artificial life.

  • @killerboyfoolz "he showed us that we can 'make' artificial life" so there you go make=create see if ventor's experiment happens on its own with no life

  • @DerekMcCauley Failing to talk about miller's experiment? Look up at miller-urey experiment and you'll get your answer.

  • Why on Earth would people post stuff about the bible? Bible has nothing to do with science, it only talks about life and life experiences. There are no evidence in the bible whatsoever.

  • We ARE NOT accidental animals!!!

  • Most of the people here are just plain arrogant and rude. Others are religious fanatics. This is serious stuff, and small minded people need not apply.

  • Natural selection works on a limited basis, evolution does not. Darwin himself did not approach the origin of life itself - his theory dealt only with changes after they occur not their origin and admitted that any arguments which revealed facts showing unsustainable development of a complex organ refuted his theory. The Bible is not against it, and some scientists coopt the two. All religions believe in the sanctity of life , not just Christianity. Watch the whole video and understand.

  • @prettyemofreak

    The courts ruled,  Science is what scientists do, and they don't do IC or ID.

  • Such an awesome series here.

    I find it comical that Darwin compared the complexity of life to a great branching tree..haha....

    Revelation 2:7

    He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the TREE OF LIFE, which is in the paradise of God.

    Psalm 24:1 The earth is the LORD's, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; AMEN!

  • @Shamu171

    It is a branching tree, everything shares a common ancestor. You are mammal.

  • @gregrutz Hmmm. Where did the tree come from? Who planted the seed to this 'tree'? And where did this seed come from?

  • @jouljert This is kinda too late to reply, but life form from atoms; atoms form bonds then creates protein; the protein then create polyproteins (DNA, cell membrane or phospholipids, cell wall, organelles, etc.); those polyproteins creates cells (bacterias, fungus, and other micro organisms); all of those cells, depending what type, form larger complex form (Animals, plants, etc). All you really need is to relate everything towards a chemical developement to understand.

  • @killerboyfoolz

    Appreciate your reply. Fact is, DNA is more complex than we like to think. see  youtube.com/watch?v=seAHybCIBz­k

  • @jouljert your link doesn't work. And the DNA sequences are getting simpler and simpler every year. I believe later on in the future we can read the DNA codes and know what it does. So far we already know what gene hold what genenic materials. So the complex of the DNA can be solve I believe.

  • @gregrutz Heel, low life.

  • Comment removed

  • you guys are spot on :)

    as for prettyemofreak, i find it remarkable that you substantiate your claims by citing the devil and hell, both clearly religious symbols. If you look into it, you will find that science is MOST CERTAINLY about what mikunited1 said: reaching a conclusion based on observable, natural evidence. Science is the study of nature, theology is the study of things beyond nature, and it is important to be able to distinguish between the two concepts.

  • IC = ID = creationism = bible story= religion = banned in schools.

  • @gregrutz Its banned in schools because morons like you can';t fully refute it. Instead you and your ilk have it explained away as BIBLE THUMPING when its anything but.

  • @thebig1

    It is banned in school because it is you religion, if we teach it we have to teach Islam and Hindu too.

  • @thebig1 ID is completly seperate from christianity. I could say Darwinism is a religion afterall your leftists do hold him up as a God. If your so sure Darwinism is true then teach ID and Darwinism together and let the students hear both and make up their own minds.

  • @thebig1 Creationism is in the book of genesis not the bible. School banned creationism because it has no back up evidence. Evolution has some facts that are back up with evidence and so we teach evolution in school.

  • @killerboyfoolz Evolution has so many holes its not even funny. The fossil record itself refutes Evolution outright and don't even get me started on strata and why a global flood truely happened. You are truely a sheeple!!!!

  • @thebig1 Some fossils are wrong because of the carbon 14 in them had turn into nitrogen. So you cannot say fossil record is bad. Had you ever heard of Carbon dating? It prove that our Earth is over 4.5 billion years old. Global flood (Global warming) usually happens ever 25 thousands years. This had been proven by the butterfly effect theory. For the "sheeple", if that's word, I use all of the studies I acknowledge and put them together to understand. Please, supply me with your idea.

  • @killerboyfoolz If the Moronic atheist studied Homochirality and Racemic mixtues, they would know life could never arise by chance!!!

  • @5tonyvvvv "Chance." Do you know what evolution, mutation, natural selection, gene flow, or genetic drift are?

    A chiral is like a compounds that tricks our body. Another thing about chiral, let us say a left hand and right hand; people who are right hand are more confortable using their right hand than left hand.

    Also, what makes you think Chiral is a form of disproving evidence against science?

  • @killerboyfoolz WOW, you Have no clue what you are saying!, natural selection would never help you, you have nothing to select from dummy! you dont have a living cell yet! and your rambling about Right and Left handed amino acids is complete Nonsense, you dont know chemistry if you think a Racemic mixture can produce Life! homochirality never occurs in Nature! Not even under amazing laboratory conditions! which stanley Miller proved!!!

  • These guys have an idea and look for ways to substantiate it,whilst genuine science works the other way round.This is just creationism in a shiny newer wrapping.This is faith,not science.

  • @mikunited1 No again your displaying that age old liberal disease called LAck of openmindedness. yOU SAY AS A lIBERAL YOU HAVE IT BUT WHEN SOMETHING COMES ALONG THAT DOESN'T SUIT YOUR TEMPLATE YOU SAY ITS PROPAGANDA. hmmmm

  • @thebig1

    Interesting you say this because you deny Darwinian evolution simply because your holy book tells you to. Somehow that's not closed minded? People are closed minded because they reject ideas that have no validity? Your logic is flawed.

  • @mikunited1

    r u that ignorant? that is exactly how all science works. u develop a theory and then gather data to see whether it proves or disproves your theory. perhaps u should try directly refuting a specific argument and refrain from ad hominem attacks if u wish to be taken seriously

  • @mikunited1 Romans 1

    "19.Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20.For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse"

  • @blattt188

    "Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them..."

    So, we don't need a Bible.

    " for God hath shewed it unto them"

    Ditto.

    "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead"

    No need for a Bible.

    "so that they are without excuse"

    "But, God!...I didn't have a Bible!"

    "You didn't need a Bible; I revealed Myself in Nature!"

  • I wonder if he ever read JOHN 15.

    Seems similar in principle.

  • great stuff

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more