You completely have no idea of what is natural selection. You pick and choose words you think can disprove science. Just because you read one chapter from a book doesn't mean you know everything. Miller tried to show us how life can form from inorganic molecules. Evolution already happened. We have visual evidence that a species can evolve. There's one that evolve different stomach just in 30 generations. You should see Craig Ventor's experiment. He showed us that we can make artificial life.
@killerboyfoolz "he showed us that we can 'make' artificial life" so there you go make=create see if ventor's experiment happens on its own with no life
Why on Earth would people post stuff about the bible? Bible has nothing to do with science, it only talks about life and life experiences. There are no evidence in the bible whatsoever.
Most of the people here are just plain arrogant and rude. Others are religious fanatics. This is serious stuff, and small minded people need not apply.
Natural selection works on a limited basis, evolution does not. Darwin himself did not approach the origin of life itself - his theory dealt only with changes after they occur not their origin and admitted that any arguments which revealed facts showing unsustainable development of a complex organ refuted his theory. The Bible is not against it, and some scientists coopt the two. All religions believe in the sanctity of life , not just Christianity. Watch the whole video and understand.
I find it comical that Darwin compared the complexity of life to a great branching tree..haha....
Revelation 2:7
He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the TREE OF LIFE, which is in the paradise of God.
Psalm 24:1 The earth is the LORD's, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; AMEN!
@jouljert This is kinda too late to reply, but life form from atoms; atoms form bonds then creates protein; the protein then create polyproteins (DNA, cell membrane or phospholipids, cell wall, organelles, etc.); those polyproteins creates cells (bacterias, fungus, and other micro organisms); all of those cells, depending what type, form larger complex form (Animals, plants, etc). All you really need is to relate everything towards a chemical developement to understand.
@jouljert your link doesn't work. And the DNA sequences are getting simpler and simpler every year. I believe later on in the future we can read the DNA codes and know what it does. So far we already know what gene hold what genenic materials. So the complex of the DNA can be solve I believe.
as for prettyemofreak, i find it remarkable that you substantiate your claims by citing the devil and hell, both clearly religious symbols. If you look into it, you will find that science is MOST CERTAINLY about what mikunited1 said: reaching a conclusion based on observable, natural evidence. Science is the study of nature, theology is the study of things beyond nature, and it is important to be able to distinguish between the two concepts.
Yes; there is evolution for adaptation but not for speciation. NO amount of selective breading of any species can change it into another species. Once a dog, always a dog.
@gregrutz Its banned in schools because morons like you can';t fully refute it. Instead you and your ilk have it explained away as BIBLE THUMPING when its anything but.
@thebig1 ID is completly seperate from christianity. I could say Darwinism is a religion afterall your leftists do hold him up as a God. If your so sure Darwinism is true then teach ID and Darwinism together and let the students hear both and make up their own minds.
@thebig1 Creationism is in the book of genesis not the bible. School banned creationism because it has no back up evidence. Evolution has some facts that are back up with evidence and so we teach evolution in school.
@killerboyfoolz Evolution has so many holes its not even funny. The fossil record itself refutes Evolution outright and don't even get me started on strata and why a global flood truely happened. You are truely a sheeple!!!!
@thebig1 Some fossils are wrong because of the carbon 14 in them had turn into nitrogen. So you cannot say fossil record is bad. Had you ever heard of Carbon dating? It prove that our Earth is over 4.5 billion years old. Global flood (Global warming) usually happens ever 25 thousands years. This had been proven by the butterfly effect theory. For the "sheeple", if that's word, I use all of the studies I acknowledge and put them together to understand. Please, supply me with your idea.
@5tonyvvvv "Chance." Do you know what evolution, mutation, natural selection, gene flow, or genetic drift are?
A chiral is like a compounds that tricks our body. Another thing about chiral, let us say a left hand and right hand; people who are right hand are more confortable using their right hand than left hand.
Also, what makes you think Chiral is a form of disproving evidence against science?
@killerboyfoolz WOW, you Have no clue what you are saying!, natural selection would never help you, you have nothing to select from dummy! you dont have a living cell yet! and your rambling about Right and Left handed amino acids is complete Nonsense, you dont know chemistry if you think a Racemic mixture can produce Life! homochirality never occurs in Nature! Not even under amazing laboratory conditions! which stanley Miller proved!!!
These guys have an idea and look for ways to substantiate it,whilst genuine science works the other way round.This is just creationism in a shiny newer wrapping.This is faith,not science.
@mikunited1 No again your displaying that age old liberal disease called LAck of openmindedness. yOU SAY AS A lIBERAL YOU HAVE IT BUT WHEN SOMETHING COMES ALONG THAT DOESN'T SUIT YOUR TEMPLATE YOU SAY ITS PROPAGANDA. hmmmm
Interesting you say this because you deny Darwinian evolution simply because your holy book tells you to. Somehow that's not closed minded? People are closed minded because they reject ideas that have no validity? Your logic is flawed.
r u that ignorant? that is exactly how all science works. u develop a theory and then gather data to see whether it proves or disproves your theory. perhaps u should try directly refuting a specific argument and refrain from ad hominem attacks if u wish to be taken seriously
"19.Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20.For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse"
"Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them..."
So, we don't need a Bible.
" for God hath shewed it unto them"
Ditto.
"For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead"
No need for a Bible.
"so that they are without excuse"
"But, God!...I didn't have a Bible!"
"You didn't need a Bible; I revealed Myself in Nature!"
You completely have no idea of what is natural selection. You pick and choose words you think can disprove science. Just because you read one chapter from a book doesn't mean you know everything. Miller tried to show us how life can form from inorganic molecules. Evolution already happened. We have visual evidence that a species can evolve. There's one that evolve different stomach just in 30 generations. You should see Craig Ventor's experiment. He showed us that we can make artificial life.
killerboyfoolz 9 months ago
@killerboyfoolz "he showed us that we can 'make' artificial life" so there you go make=create see if ventor's experiment happens on its own with no life
DerekMcCauley 8 months ago
@DerekMcCauley Failing to talk about miller's experiment? Look up at miller-urey experiment and you'll get your answer.
killerboyfoolz 8 months ago
Why on Earth would people post stuff about the bible? Bible has nothing to do with science, it only talks about life and life experiences. There are no evidence in the bible whatsoever.
killerboyfoolz 1 year ago
We ARE NOT accidental animals!!!
ChrisnStarry 1 year ago
Most of the people here are just plain arrogant and rude. Others are religious fanatics. This is serious stuff, and small minded people need not apply.
ronharrow 1 year ago
Natural selection works on a limited basis, evolution does not. Darwin himself did not approach the origin of life itself - his theory dealt only with changes after they occur not their origin and admitted that any arguments which revealed facts showing unsustainable development of a complex organ refuted his theory. The Bible is not against it, and some scientists coopt the two. All religions believe in the sanctity of life , not just Christianity. Watch the whole video and understand.
barkerpsj 1 year ago
@prettyemofreak
The courts ruled, Science is what scientists do, and they don't do IC or ID.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Such an awesome series here.
I find it comical that Darwin compared the complexity of life to a great branching tree..haha....
Revelation 2:7
He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the TREE OF LIFE, which is in the paradise of God.
Psalm 24:1 The earth is the LORD's, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; AMEN!
Shamu171 2 years ago
@Shamu171
It is a branching tree, everything shares a common ancestor. You are mammal.
gregrutz 2 years ago
@gregrutz Hmmm. Where did the tree come from? Who planted the seed to this 'tree'? And where did this seed come from?
jouljert 1 year ago
@jouljert This is kinda too late to reply, but life form from atoms; atoms form bonds then creates protein; the protein then create polyproteins (DNA, cell membrane or phospholipids, cell wall, organelles, etc.); those polyproteins creates cells (bacterias, fungus, and other micro organisms); all of those cells, depending what type, form larger complex form (Animals, plants, etc). All you really need is to relate everything towards a chemical developement to understand.
killerboyfoolz 1 year ago
@killerboyfoolz
Appreciate your reply. Fact is, DNA is more complex than we like to think. see youtube.com/watch?v=seAHybCIBzk
jouljert 1 year ago
@jouljert your link doesn't work. And the DNA sequences are getting simpler and simpler every year. I believe later on in the future we can read the DNA codes and know what it does. So far we already know what gene hold what genenic materials. So the complex of the DNA can be solve I believe.
killerboyfoolz 1 year ago
@gregrutz Heel, low life.
jouljert 1 year ago
Comment removed
decemberrbaby 2 years ago
you guys are spot on :)
as for prettyemofreak, i find it remarkable that you substantiate your claims by citing the devil and hell, both clearly religious symbols. If you look into it, you will find that science is MOST CERTAINLY about what mikunited1 said: reaching a conclusion based on observable, natural evidence. Science is the study of nature, theology is the study of things beyond nature, and it is important to be able to distinguish between the two concepts.
decemberrbaby 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@decemberrbaby IC = ID = creationism = bible story= religion = banned in schools
gregrutz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes; there is evolution for adaptation but not for speciation. NO amount of selective breading of any species can change it into another species. Once a dog, always a dog.
Mr123me321 2 years ago
IC = ID = creationism = bible story= religion = banned in schools.
gregrutz 2 years ago
@gregrutz Its banned in schools because morons like you can';t fully refute it. Instead you and your ilk have it explained away as BIBLE THUMPING when its anything but.
thebig1 2 years ago
@thebig1
It is banned in school because it is you religion, if we teach it we have to teach Islam and Hindu too.
gregrutz 2 years ago
@thebig1 ID is completly seperate from christianity. I could say Darwinism is a religion afterall your leftists do hold him up as a God. If your so sure Darwinism is true then teach ID and Darwinism together and let the students hear both and make up their own minds.
thebig1 2 years ago
@thebig1 Creationism is in the book of genesis not the bible. School banned creationism because it has no back up evidence. Evolution has some facts that are back up with evidence and so we teach evolution in school.
killerboyfoolz 1 year ago
@killerboyfoolz Evolution has so many holes its not even funny. The fossil record itself refutes Evolution outright and don't even get me started on strata and why a global flood truely happened. You are truely a sheeple!!!!
thebig1 1 year ago
@thebig1 Some fossils are wrong because of the carbon 14 in them had turn into nitrogen. So you cannot say fossil record is bad. Had you ever heard of Carbon dating? It prove that our Earth is over 4.5 billion years old. Global flood (Global warming) usually happens ever 25 thousands years. This had been proven by the butterfly effect theory. For the "sheeple", if that's word, I use all of the studies I acknowledge and put them together to understand. Please, supply me with your idea.
killerboyfoolz 1 year ago
@killerboyfoolz If the Moronic atheist studied Homochirality and Racemic mixtues, they would know life could never arise by chance!!!
5tonyvvvv 9 months ago
@5tonyvvvv "Chance." Do you know what evolution, mutation, natural selection, gene flow, or genetic drift are?
A chiral is like a compounds that tricks our body. Another thing about chiral, let us say a left hand and right hand; people who are right hand are more confortable using their right hand than left hand.
Also, what makes you think Chiral is a form of disproving evidence against science?
killerboyfoolz 9 months ago
@killerboyfoolz WOW, you Have no clue what you are saying!, natural selection would never help you, you have nothing to select from dummy! you dont have a living cell yet! and your rambling about Right and Left handed amino acids is complete Nonsense, you dont know chemistry if you think a Racemic mixture can produce Life! homochirality never occurs in Nature! Not even under amazing laboratory conditions! which stanley Miller proved!!!
5tonyvvvv 9 months ago
These guys have an idea and look for ways to substantiate it,whilst genuine science works the other way round.This is just creationism in a shiny newer wrapping.This is faith,not science.
mikunited1 2 years ago 2
@mikunited1 No again your displaying that age old liberal disease called LAck of openmindedness. yOU SAY AS A lIBERAL YOU HAVE IT BUT WHEN SOMETHING COMES ALONG THAT DOESN'T SUIT YOUR TEMPLATE YOU SAY ITS PROPAGANDA. hmmmm
thebig1 2 years ago
@thebig1
Interesting you say this because you deny Darwinian evolution simply because your holy book tells you to. Somehow that's not closed minded? People are closed minded because they reject ideas that have no validity? Your logic is flawed.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
@mikunited1
r u that ignorant? that is exactly how all science works. u develop a theory and then gather data to see whether it proves or disproves your theory. perhaps u should try directly refuting a specific argument and refrain from ad hominem attacks if u wish to be taken seriously
mebe84 1 year ago
@mikunited1 Romans 1
"19.Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20.For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse"
blattt188 1 year ago
@blattt188
"Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them..."
So, we don't need a Bible.
" for God hath shewed it unto them"
Ditto.
"For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead"
No need for a Bible.
"so that they are without excuse"
"But, God!...I didn't have a Bible!"
"You didn't need a Bible; I revealed Myself in Nature!"
Sockpuppet2012 1 year ago
I wonder if he ever read JOHN 15.
Seems similar in principle.
afieder 2 years ago
great stuff
jamiefhr 2 years ago