Suppose dark matter and dark energy are largely the result of a failure to quantize gravity properly. A property of matter whereby gravitational outluxes retrace influxes allows a galaxy to have a much larger gravitational binding energy than indicated by its luminous mass, and a reduced binding with other galaxies. Combining this with the graviton cycle effect allows a galaxy to maintain stable size despite the binding energy, while it messes with lensing mass reconstruction algorithms.
The conservation of energy aspect of my view on gravitons has to do with the magnitude of field energy, and with how this field energy magnitude, if expressed as a force vector, may oscillate in the value of its vector component along the propagation path of the quantum. Looking at Hoag's Object, it appeared that one full cycle of oscillation occurs in propagation from core to ring. Ring size (~10^21m) is ~10^36 times proton size (10^-15m),10^36 being coulomb/gravity ratio for a proton pair.
I suppose gravitons are spin 1 for two main reasons, each reason involves a distinct quantum-ready concept that is largely unconventional but is, I believe, quite rational. Besides observations, one reason has to do with bosons being their own antiparticles, and the other reason has to do with conservation of energy. I suppose a boson is its own antiparticle by a 180 degree phase shift of its intrinsic frequency (all bosons have a phase-cycle), and outflux direction retraces influx direction.
A quantum (or force, or spacetime curvature) "spin" designation is a description of the symmetry that exists with a quantum (or force) exchange's *effect* upon two masses that perform the exchange. If one doesn't know whether the observed effect is due to one particle being exchanged or to two, then one cannot directly determine the characteristic spin of the relevant quanta. Gravitons appear to me to be spin 1 due to observations I've made on behavior usually attributed to "dark" matter/energy.
There's not much reason to think the speed of gravity is different from the speed of light. I don't agree with GR and curved space, however, so my ideas are about gravitons moving on straight paths and photons influenced by gravitons to take longer paths. I'd say gravitons move at the same speed as photons in flat space and thus a photon could carry the same gravitons on its entire path if the path isn't bent. I see gravity as a spin 2 effect mediated by spin 1 gravitons with pair symmetry.
gravity's just an affect, a perception of the clumping of matter in space time, its like you have a motorway some vehicles are heavier and moving slower, and some are lighter and move faster the faster vehicles reach up with the heavy vehicles like smaller clumps of matter in space time and cause congestion the more vehicles, the slower it will go in the instance of traffic. so any matter or cars travelling faster will catch up in space time. Gravity's just a perceptual effect.
dank son i gotta get this program
crockman1 3 months ago
dank son
crockman1 3 months ago
Suppose dark matter and dark energy are largely the result of a failure to quantize gravity properly. A property of matter whereby gravitational outluxes retrace influxes allows a galaxy to have a much larger gravitational binding energy than indicated by its luminous mass, and a reduced binding with other galaxies. Combining this with the graviton cycle effect allows a galaxy to maintain stable size despite the binding energy, while it messes with lensing mass reconstruction algorithms.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
The conservation of energy aspect of my view on gravitons has to do with the magnitude of field energy, and with how this field energy magnitude, if expressed as a force vector, may oscillate in the value of its vector component along the propagation path of the quantum. Looking at Hoag's Object, it appeared that one full cycle of oscillation occurs in propagation from core to ring. Ring size (~10^21m) is ~10^36 times proton size (10^-15m),10^36 being coulomb/gravity ratio for a proton pair.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
I suppose gravitons are spin 1 for two main reasons, each reason involves a distinct quantum-ready concept that is largely unconventional but is, I believe, quite rational. Besides observations, one reason has to do with bosons being their own antiparticles, and the other reason has to do with conservation of energy. I suppose a boson is its own antiparticle by a 180 degree phase shift of its intrinsic frequency (all bosons have a phase-cycle), and outflux direction retraces influx direction.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
A quantum (or force, or spacetime curvature) "spin" designation is a description of the symmetry that exists with a quantum (or force) exchange's *effect* upon two masses that perform the exchange. If one doesn't know whether the observed effect is due to one particle being exchanged or to two, then one cannot directly determine the characteristic spin of the relevant quanta. Gravitons appear to me to be spin 1 due to observations I've made on behavior usually attributed to "dark" matter/energy.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
There's not much reason to think the speed of gravity is different from the speed of light. I don't agree with GR and curved space, however, so my ideas are about gravitons moving on straight paths and photons influenced by gravitons to take longer paths. I'd say gravitons move at the same speed as photons in flat space and thus a photon could carry the same gravitons on its entire path if the path isn't bent. I see gravity as a spin 2 effect mediated by spin 1 gravitons with pair symmetry.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
gravity's just an affect, a perception of the clumping of matter in space time, its like you have a motorway some vehicles are heavier and moving slower, and some are lighter and move faster the faster vehicles reach up with the heavy vehicles like smaller clumps of matter in space time and cause congestion the more vehicles, the slower it will go in the instance of traffic. so any matter or cars travelling faster will catch up in space time. Gravity's just a perceptual effect.
Ajscosmos 9 months ago
Speed of gravity is the speed of light. Sorry. CRaZy ArGuEmEnT
dacat 10 months ago
LOL... "Dude, we're so smart ." "You're right - lets dance in celebration!" *boogie*
TheSestren 10 months ago
Why don't you just talk yourself instead of getting robots to do it for you? It sounds retarded.
Ghostneedle1 10 months ago