Added: 3 years ago
From: TheNewYorkTimes
Views: 3,200
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Northgtabeast

    Exactly. Israel kills 11.3 civilians for every one in retaliation by the Palestinians, who are rightfully defending their land from the illegal occupation and blockade held by Israel in cynical defiance of all standards of international law.

  • Ethan Bronner- what a hunk

  • whatever the reason, it is NOT an excuse to kill civilians. Both sides are wrong in doing so and this can be prevented. If Israel is so advanced and smart, why doesn't it set an example and come up with a solution? We don't want another darfur.. after all humanity is shared right?..

  • The fighting will never ENDS YOU KNOW WHY

    Remember Moses and mount Sanai ! remember Jesus!

    The fight will never end! Its the Israelite fault why this is happening to them long long time ago. don't get Mad of them its our all mighty God forbid them! everything has a reason! why this is happening! because Christ is coming! read Apocalypse and revelation you'll know it! TY!

  • get off youtube, new york times

  • Israel is not at fault for attacking Gaza, Israel has been attacked for years and no one has made a single complaint about it, but when Israel fights back, its like the end of the world.

  • Israel=Apartheid and Genocide!!!!!

  • It is because they murder and butcher innocents. Sure any terrorism is outrageous but you treat the Palestinians like pigs and steal their land on a daily basis. You are choking them and they have absolutely no rights.

  • Dowzer you are such a biased prick. You complain about Palestinian attacks over the last 10 years , what about the 100,000s of murders the jews have committed, invasions of lebanon, west bank etc, the millions they have displaced and the war crimes the Israelis have committed?

  • Yes they will the UN is a combination of peace and when Israel hit UN buildings that broke the standing with the UN. Egypt USA Turkey will all

    fight Israel. What they did in the Holy Land is a shame "Gaza".

  • israel is the aggressors...theyre tryin to bully them like the us does to everyone...but ya know....theeeeyyyy aint us....

  • notice its always the same story. "the bad guys ran into the warehouse, school, house full of kids, hospital, so we had no choice but to kill them all."

  • Israelis wear funny helmets

  • If Israel isnt letting reporters in then we're obviously not hearing the truth. Isreal is the aggressor in this not hamas dont be fooled by false media.

  • APAC controlled media. It is sad.

  • the craziest youtube channel is

    PugVegas

  • When Isreali bombed the U.N. buildings there that is a breech of contract the U.N. is a neutral where it represents all countries "supposedly" and grounds for war on Israel just for that.

  • Well now it is abundantly clear: The NYT is not embedded with Israeli army; the State of Israel is embedded in the NYT Institutionally.

    On a day when WORLD NEWS reported this same "soft story"(as it appears via the NYT), here's what was widely reported WITH VIDEO CORROBORATION, and what was intentionally left out, purged from NYT Reporting:

    (1) Israel used white phosphorous in bombing the UN facility; this is a banned weapon, and a war crime to use it. (not on NYT radar).. (2)

  • (CONT'D 2) ... (2) Israel head of State initially reported the bombing of the UN Facility as a grave mistake. Then, when that was deemed insufficient to quell concerns of Israel's targeting of the UN bldg -- even though Israel had all coordinates of all UN facilities, and the UN facillity was flying the UN flag -- new story: "They fired on us".

    The NYT "sells" this story version here, courtesy of Ian & NYT Editorial Board, even though this was refuted by onsite UN officials ON CAMERA... (3)

  • (3) Ian will claim "but I said the UN disputes that" -- giving equal weight to the changing story of Israeli politicians who were not there -- & the onsite UN offcials who were there.

    (4) Funny that the NYT picked the day of the UN FACILITY BOMBING, where it took 6 hours to put out the white phosphorous fires that destroyed humanitarian aid ready to be deployed throughout the warehouses, to give their "embedded journalist" view. Almost as if to say "See, Israel lets us in to report the truth"

  • (CONT'D 4) - on the same day that the REUTERS NEWS office nearby the UN facility bombed was ALSO stuck, sending two foreign press to hospital with serious wounds. (ALSO seen on camera on CBS Evening News last night).

    So, congratulations Israeli PR Machine. Your embeds at the NYT dutifully carried out your PR Disaster Mitigation Strategy, by softselling the UN targeted bombing, instead showing NYT reporter regurgitating what he's told to say by Israeli military re tunnels.

    Truly disgusting.

  • (CONT'D 5) So, once again NYT appeases a loud vocal revenue generator sector of their subscriber base, cues up a propaganda piece to offset World Condemnation of yesterday's attacks by Israel of UN Humanitarian centers, where Palestinians had been instructed to go to be SAFE from Israeli shelling.

    It's clear this is not journalism. The question is, how much lower can you go before other subscribers say "Hey wait a minute. This is total whitewash"?

    This is The New York Times, stripped bare.

  • Ian Fisher. I wonder if he's a.... oh, who cares. We know all the truth. Israel "allows" foreign reporters. Oh really, Mr. Fisher? According to CNN, they didn't even allow them to have any dialog with Palestinians; they were "embedded" with the occupying/invading force and were only allowed to go where they were told. I'm canceling my subscription to this channel, especially after NYT's Op-Ed which justified killing civilians "to teach them a lesson." More propaganda by Jewish journalists.

  • (( NYT's Op-Ed which justified killing civilians "to teach them a lesson." ))

    Can you elaborate please? Was it 1-15-09 or 1-16-09, and was this a NYT Editorial Staff OpEd or was it a Guest Opinion. If Guest Opinion, how was the author identified?

    The New York Times is now a laughing stock. the only people who believe them are New Yorkers. You're no longer a National Newspaper, and for sure not an International One. Just a business, like most others. Pathetic.

  • Send me a friend invite (to do away with the friend lock) so I can email you the link to the article.

  • keytoothed: thx, got it. All you had to do is say "Tom Friedman" & that would have spoken volumes. The NYT Lead Salesman for the Elective War in Iraq. So full of crap in his constant enthusiasm for the Iraq Misadventure, that on liberal blogs across the USA, a new piece of langauage was born to describe Friedman's frequent cheery statement that "we just need maybe 6 more months and we'll see the payoff": This 6 mos interval became enshrined as "a Friedman unit".

    Oped: tinyurl*com/gazafriedman

  • After bombing the UN, hospitals, schools, Israel has lost all credibility, why do you keep on quoting their lies?

    The world should just declare that country a rogue state.

  • 1st

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more