Jericho and Archaeology, by Dr. Bryant Wood

[holybibleistrue]

Thank you. It's best to look at the evidence. God bless you.

[earlysda]

The evidence is overwhelming for the veracity of the Bible.

[abarrathemaster]

discoveries of the Tower of Jericho also prooves that conan was real, a tower bulit between 8,000 to 9,000BC the same time that the events of the Tower of The Elephant taking place. Could the Tower of Jericho could be the same as the tower of the elephant? well they both so happen to be standing at the same time so why not.

[johndeweb]

There should be thousands of Christians attending Dr.Wood's seminars, & he should be filling stadiums.

[squints328]

Old Earth Creationism is always the trump card for atheists despite the Bible CLEARLY teaching that our measurememt of time differs from God's.

You're entitled tocyour unbelief, bit you should laugh at your evangelical fervor for your atheist dogma. Oh the irony.

[JesusNonEnviromental]

God does not argue with the Unbeliever, God is content to leave him in his state of unbelief and to die in his sins. So many unbelievers argue and become very defensive about their unbelief so allow them to have it

[Mike2002Mike]

Today we actually know that Jericho proves not only that the bible’s stories are legends, but that the creation story of Judaism, Christianity and Islam is a myth

The first permanent settlement in Jericho was built near the Ein as-Sultan spring between 8000 and 7000 BCE, which makes it older then “The World” itself according to the bible, which claims that god created earth 5770 years ago.

[JesusNonEnviromental]

@Mike2002Mike Sir, you can have your unbelief, noone will take it from you

[MajesticCyru]

@Mike2002Mike Those who study today's archaeology and scientific evidence know factually who is winning the debate for Intelligent Design over Chance. We have conclusive evidence to say, "Santa Clause is a myth or that he is the legend of St. Nicolas." However the GREAT Jesus Christ was a real live man who died on a cross ..(as an innocent man). If you compare the evidence for Creation today ..you would be required to have blind or illogical faith in a world without morels (a godless-world)

[highwind8124]

My jaw dropped at 10 to 11 minutes. This dupe just unwittingly proved where the myth came from.

He didn't need to show a natural occurrence of the river halting. God, by definition, can do anything. Pointing out that river ceases to flow after an earthquake means that's probably where the writer got the myth from, or what he was inspired by.

Showing that this "miracle" is naturally occurring doesn't bolster your case.

[aaronshaf2006]

You're creating a dichotomy, for God can sovereignly ordain natural means to accomplish his purposes

[highwind8124]

No, I'm not, otherwise I would say it can only be either or.

When I was a Christian and I read this story, I imagined a mighty river that magically slowed to a dry halt. I was impressed.

But by pointing out that this can actually occur naturally to this very river, all the mystery is taken out of it. This evidence introduces the likelihood that the story was inspired or gotten by watching this river dry up after an earthquake.

Also, this God using natural means stuff is cheap, fluffy talk.

[aaronshaf2006]

It's fluffy talk if you believe universes can burst themselves into existence uncaused out of nothing.

[highwind8124]

Okay, well right off the bat, you just admitted you're not a Christian. The commandment twice stated is not to bear false witness against you neighbor. But here you are doing just that by saying that there is one single scientist who is claiming that the universe that burst into existence out of nothing.

Keep it up. We need to know who the fakers are.

[aaronshaf2006]

See "Creation out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration", by

Paul Copan and William Craig.

[highwind8124]

See what in it? Don't lead me on a wild goose chase. Just quote from it which credible scientist says specifically that the universe "came into existence out of nothing", as you claim, if you are not a liar.

[aaronshaf2006]

See youtube[dot]com/watch?v=zV6aQb­nHSRo

[highwind8124]

Okay, so first you want me to read an entire book, but then when I ask you to present a relevant quote from it, you decide not to.

Then, you've decided to quote one woman who's merely predicting that NOTHING existed before the Big Bang.

But it's impossible to know what existed before that. Furthermore, she's not simply a scientist, but a novelist, one that appeared on the radio show "Speaking of Faith".

[highwind8124]

Furthermore, she isn't really proposing the universe came out of nothing. That wish thinking is contradicted when she explains the universe could be breathing like lungs, expanding and contracting, which means there would have been SOMETHING before the Big Bang.

Duh.

[aaronshaf2006]

@highwind8124 There is more academic diversity on this issue than you realize. She was merely suggesting unproven ideas. Also, see youtube[dot]com/watch?v=TK-X3x­9tyq

[highwind8124]

That's exactly it. She's suggesting unproven ideas. She doesn't know what existed before the Big Bang, and no scientist does.

[highwind8124]

Also, I don't even know you realize the irony of quoting scientists who acknowledge the obvious fact that the world is old than what the Bible says, that it's nothing like described in Genesis, that the world wasn't founded on the incestuous sex of Adam and Eve's children, and that evolution is real.

[GiftoAll]

Interesting. There is alot of evidence for the stories in the Bible.

Book of Mormon? NO evidence!