Wanna know why the elite love marxist feminism? Visit "The Unknown History of Misandry." Take a look at the "Greatest Hits" post (in sidebar tags) to get started. You have been lied to by the professors and experts about everything "gender"-related.
There's nothing extreme about this man in the video or what he's saying. The rest of you who don't agree with him is simply because you're *completely* brainwashed. You've been programed since you were born to be a simple pawn for the those who desired to bring down the West.
Talk in front of bookshelf with an authoritive voice in a suit. Use a lot of sophisticated vocabulary. Thats how you can make anything sound reasonable and rational. And very smart.
I love how he notes Obama gets a good part of his funding from robber baron financiers and businessmen and then concludes that therefore he's secretly a radical Marxist trying to overthrow the system lol. In what world do you guys live in??? It's like you're getting crazier every day
And just curious, how many of you have read Karl Marx or the Frankfurt School's works anyway? duh
I may not be American, but his argument seems flawed. A very wide range of people migrated to the USA, not just western Europeans. For a long time, America depended upon but did not recognize these people. African slaves and women were not compensated for their labour, and other ethnic groups were barred from achieving success. Sure, America "stood for" its principles, but human beings are fallible and make mistakes. (Most) humans, however, learn from those mistakes. How else would science work?
That's not what the Frankfurt school stood for, though. They wanted to free people - the whole project was about emancipation from authoritarian dogma, alienated consumption, and misuse of rationality. I don't think the Frankfurt School ever echoed Marx's call for a "dictatorship of the proletariat," which I think is what you're referring to. Freeing mankind from prejudice, unreason, resentment, etc. - this has been part of the Western philosophical project for 100's of years...
I'm talking about cultural marxism that has been undermining western culture for decades. Georg Lukacs was forced to come up with a new way to force his marxist dictatorship on western Europe. His plan was to undermine the family & destroy western culture from within. To say its pure evil is an understatement, but thats what it is.
Yeah, but the family as we know it is not universal - it may be widespread, but it isn't "the" family. Extended families exist throughout the world. I don't want to comment on polygamous marriages, but they exist too. But then we call them degenerate. The family is always in close connection to the economy. E.g., when people make less money, it requires 2 breadwinners (man and woman), making it harder to commit to raising a family. Thus, now in Canada the nuclear family is a -minority- form.
So what? Nobody has the right to control & manipulate your personal family life. That's what they're doing through control over media, colleges, public & private schools, & even through the drug culture. They control the economy as well so it's no surprise that so many families need 2 or more jobs to survive. The vast majority of families only needed 1 breadwinner in the past. The destruction of capitalism is the ultimate goal of marxism as it is required for the final destruction of freedom.
eurocentrism, christianity and the patriarchal feudal family aren't foundations of any virtuous society, they're cancers that need to be cut out! death to fascism!
You, sir, have no idea what anarchy means. In true "anarchy", you wouldn't have to destroy all religions. If no "state" is there to require the attendance of, or ban the institutions of religion, then why in an anarchy do they have to be destroyed? It makes no sense, especially if one considers that in anarchy, on will then have the full right to decide to be religious or not.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what the fuck is this guy talking about? Not all of the founding fathers were christian. That's a lie.And even if Barrack Obama was a muslim (and by the way it's mUslim not mOslim) and not a christian, who cares?In fact I think it's about time we have another athiest president(thats right I said another, do some research and maybe you'll actually learn somethingI think that it seems smart to elect someone who doesn't believe in stupid fucking bronze age myths.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Exactly right. All of the founding fathers were not christian but this guy is just a racist. The "council of conservative citizens" is an extension of the KKK. Good to know right now he's eating a huge shit burger. Lol.
i know this man ( Mr. Fromm) and he is a great respectable man who is a former teacher who was fired after years of jewish organizations trying to get him fired for having free speech speeches where a few skinheads happeneed to come and he was labled a nazi. If u type in paul fromm on youtube there will b a news show on him where they even said that he treated everyone equally and he left his polititcs at home.
There are plenty of properties that our founding fathers had which subsequent presidents did not have. Why should we think the properties you cherry pick are important?
Also, he got almost all of his money from small, individual donations.
Communism is where most of the population have no choice (that is same car, grey clothes, etc because of no competition in capitalism) and have boring lives watched over by a security service and if you step out of line you go missing. The leaders live beaut lavish lives at the total expense of the population.
Sorry, that's wrong! Communism is a hypothesized classless and stateless society. What you're talking about is state-centric socialism (sometimes with Marxist inspiration) as it existed historically in several countries. Considering that your definition is quite far from that of Marx who coined the term (and is an attempt to build a straw man), yours has no relevance. Thanks for playing though!
"Revolutionaries...who wanted to overthrow the...Christian...aristocratic order"
Sounds like the Founding Fathers of the United States to me, since they overthrew the British aristocratic colonial order with its state religion, and then inscribed in the Constitution a secular-oriented freedom of religion and banning of aristocratic titles.
Washington and Jefferson--what a bunch of Marxists!
All the commies must be living on anti-commie videos like this, spying them out. Sounds like we need anothr Joe Mcarthy wichhunt and ban these commos from youtube.
the cold war on youtube....... continues because they lost it in the real world.;...
No, I'm afraid you didn't. No one has ever lived under communism, which is a classless and stateless society that has only been hypothesized and never has been proclaimed by any group or government.
"No, I'm afraid you didn't. No one has ever lived under communism, which is a classless and stateless society that has only been hypothesized"
Yes that's why it can never exist. It's a theoretical impossibility. It's a contradiction to do economics without private property and a classless society is impossible because people are not naturally equal. Also a stateles society is a contradiction in terms. To sum up Marxism was a really really stupid theory.
I had a point JohananRaatz; do you have one, or at least one that isn't a meaningless opinionated assertion?
Private property is a concept that evolved over the past few centuries, yet we've had economic activity for millennia. The modern state too is a structure that was created only in the 17th century, why then is "a stateles[sic] society a contradiction in terms"?
"I had a point JohananRaatz; do you have one, or at least one that isn't a meaningless opinionated assertion?"
They are not meaningless assertions. I was pointing out that politics and economics require the inclusion of fundamental concepts if we are to make any sense of them.
"Private property is a concept that evolved over the past few centuries, yet we've had economic activity for millennia."
No private property has been around since the dawn of history. That's why people millenia ago had a concept of "stealing." Frankly I've never heard such a ridiculous statement before.People exchanged items as private property all throughout history. That's why we can unearth coins from the Roman period or learn the history of the barter system of the ancient Egyptians.
"The modern state too is a structure that was created only in the 17th century, why then is "a stateles[sic] society a contradiction in terms"?"
In it's modern form yes.But a government of one form or another has always existed.If it hasn't escaped your notice a state is a society.Without a government defining the rules or boundaries of a state you can't define that state as any particular society. Rather "societies" would be formless and non-concretizable abstractions(ie they wouldn't exist)
Your assertion that society does not exist without the state is patently absurd, and needs only the most superficial brief study of antropology and sociology to be corrected. Your subsequent qualifications notwithstanding, it is a very narrow-minded reading of human society.
As civil society is related to, but distinct from, the state, and as primitive societies (and many small communities) existed without the state, I am not so unimaginative as to declare such a thing an impossibility.
As civil society is related to, but distinct from, the state, and as primitive societies (and many small communities) existed without the state, I am not so unimaginative as to declare such a thing an impossibility.
OK first of all those small communities had a surrogate for the state. The cheif and the tribal elders in that case were the "state". I'm not meaning "state" in the modern sense. I mean emblem of authority that ties the community together. You can't have a society without one.
Gosh, you sure are liberal in your use of comments!
Until the enclosure movement in the UK and similar developments in Europe as feudalism ended, private property as it is conceived today did not exist. The idea of property was even farther from how we today conceive of it in the world outside Europe. The modern legal/economic conception of private property had no meaning to the majority of the world's population until the 19th century.
Private property in it's modern form may not have existed but some other equivalent category did exist. Feudalism for example had a conception similar to private property. The fiefdom was the "private property" of the feudal lord. And besides that the concept of stealing relies on the concept of private property and people knew what stealing was since the dawn of civilization.
Obama is culturally European and if anything is a crypto-atheist.
His father, who had no involvement in his upbring, was only nominally a muslim and his mother was a skeptical anthropology student. His Indonesian stepfather was a disillusioned political radical, not a muslim radical (All this according to his autobio)
If his cannot be culturally european by definition because of his blood, then a foreign adopted child of north american family cannot be - a ludicrous argument.
Shameful, reactionary rhetoric from a right-wing moron. But then again; what do you expect from a pig but a grunt?!
Fromm's dis-jointed critique of Marx and the Frankfurt School bears NO relevence to his xenophobic, racist propagations of Obama, apart from stoking-up old flames of anti-communist sentiment.
So big money and rich politicians are communists now? Why would the elite question a system that has stolen the power away from the people and given it to them?
You don't have to be a materialist to realize that those on the top don't want to give up their power.
Your statement has the stench of stupidity. Obama is a communist just as surely as Hilary "I want to take those profits" Clinton is a hard core communist.
The difference between Communist Clinton and Communist Obama is Communist Obama wants to turn these United States into another Zimbabwe. Communist Clinton just wants to completely ruin the economy with her moronic ignorance of economics.
All three candidates will cripple us with global warming leftist lies.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ugh. I hate how these Anglophile types try to say how America was founded upon Christianity. I agree the Frankfurt school fucked up society, but I'm not about to use something as shitty as Christianity to prove my point.
This country was founded on Christianity. Your lack of historical knowledge about the founding of this country is disgusting.
The atheist communist bastards may think they have won, but good ole boys like me have enough guns stashed away to set things right when the time comes.
In the mean time you should read the writings of the founding fathers instead of talking out your ass.
There is no such thing as "separation of church and state". The early ACLU took those words from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to a church in Danbury, CT when he was running for President; it is not part of the constitution. Jefferson simply meant there would be no state religion.
Fascism Smascism. Does anyone even know what the heck fascism is? I've yet to run across a coherent definition of fascism that doesn't at the same time encompass most every society in human history.
there have been different definitions, look it up in wikipedia.
@marxism It seems to me, you did not understand it. Marxens has analysed the actual society, but has not really worked out an alternative. Marx has shown that there are classes in capitalism (the ones who have the means of productions/the ones that dont). Marx has never really concentrated on the "state" (because no progress was possible with that instrument of the rich in 1848) Equality Liberty are just values, we should defend
"The problem with Marxism is that it doesn't realize that progress can be shared between classes."
That is not true. Marx has never said that, nor did his followers.
One problem: every sicko that wants to take money from the rich is called "marxist" today. but marxens ideas cant be made responisble for what everybody does and says. a bit less emotion and a bit more sientific accouracy wouldnt be a bad idea
This is nothing more than a racist diatribe. He uses the term european instead of the word white, like no one will understand his true meaning. This guy is a bad joke.
claiming that high political office should be reserved for white christian men is racist. 'culture war' types like this guy love to reminisce about a make-believe past when america was competely white and christian. but they're mistaken. the u.s. has always been multicultural. the romanticized past he's speaking of was simply a time when these sorts of racist ideologies were more widely accepted.
the substance of his argument is not much different from the ideas of hitler.
I've suspected that the big hollywood Jews who months ago supported Obama, did so to put pressure on Clinton in order to extract promises concerning Israel, and the war for terror, among other things.
This has been flagged as spam show
Wanna know why the elite love marxist feminism? Visit "The Unknown History of Misandry." Take a look at the "Greatest Hits" post (in sidebar tags) to get started. You have been lied to by the professors and experts about everything "gender"-related.
pkpapers 1 month ago
Fascist prick.
MasqueofAnarchy 2 months ago
There's nothing extreme about this man in the video or what he's saying. The rest of you who don't agree with him is simply because you're *completely* brainwashed. You've been programed since you were born to be a simple pawn for the those who desired to bring down the West.
boaire 6 months ago
@boaire Well stated. Instead of saying programmed, I like to say "you've been downloaded." Pax Christi!
MMan1964 2 months ago in playlist More videos from CanadaFirst2007
Karl Marx was a drunk.
AUSTINRINT 11 months ago
@AUSTINRINT
Marx was a kike
UltraZionistsupporta 9 months ago
Talk in front of bookshelf with an authoritive voice in a suit. Use a lot of sophisticated vocabulary. Thats how you can make anything sound reasonable and rational. And very smart.
Quex01 1 year ago
oh boy...a retarded, insecure, constantly-in-fear racist circle jerk. goodie.
you people don't have a fucking clue what Marxism is, or the Frankfurt School, or anything else.
pazomblez 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love how he notes Obama gets a good part of his funding from robber baron financiers and businessmen and then concludes that therefore he's secretly a radical Marxist trying to overthrow the system lol. In what world do you guys live in??? It's like you're getting crazier every day
And just curious, how many of you have read Karl Marx or the Frankfurt School's works anyway? duh
PavedStones 1 year ago
Comment removed
PavedStones 1 year ago
THE UAF ARE RED BOTHER BOYS,WHO ARE RENTER MOBS,
quantumofhate 1 year ago
Fuck you, You monkey loving muslim shit. you voted him in now swim in your own shit.
thetwistofcain 1 year ago
Paul Fromm,
NAME THE JEW OR SHUT UP.
ZOGcorp 2 years ago
Death of the West - Frankfurt School, Cultural Marxism
watch?v=K0bqQetlgJ4
KenMacMillan 2 years ago
I may not be American, but his argument seems flawed. A very wide range of people migrated to the USA, not just western Europeans. For a long time, America depended upon but did not recognize these people. African slaves and women were not compensated for their labour, and other ethnic groups were barred from achieving success. Sure, America "stood for" its principles, but human beings are fallible and make mistakes. (Most) humans, however, learn from those mistakes. How else would science work?
mikem1234 2 years ago
The problem with cultural marxism is that the goal is to undermine freedom & impose a dictatorship.
KenMacMillan 2 years ago
That's not what the Frankfurt school stood for, though. They wanted to free people - the whole project was about emancipation from authoritarian dogma, alienated consumption, and misuse of rationality. I don't think the Frankfurt School ever echoed Marx's call for a "dictatorship of the proletariat," which I think is what you're referring to. Freeing mankind from prejudice, unreason, resentment, etc. - this has been part of the Western philosophical project for 100's of years...
mikem1234 2 years ago
I'm talking about cultural marxism that has been undermining western culture for decades. Georg Lukacs was forced to come up with a new way to force his marxist dictatorship on western Europe. His plan was to undermine the family & destroy western culture from within. To say its pure evil is an understatement, but thats what it is.
KenMacMillan 2 years ago
Yeah, but the family as we know it is not universal - it may be widespread, but it isn't "the" family. Extended families exist throughout the world. I don't want to comment on polygamous marriages, but they exist too. But then we call them degenerate. The family is always in close connection to the economy. E.g., when people make less money, it requires 2 breadwinners (man and woman), making it harder to commit to raising a family. Thus, now in Canada the nuclear family is a -minority- form.
mikem1234 2 years ago
So what? Nobody has the right to control & manipulate your personal family life. That's what they're doing through control over media, colleges, public & private schools, & even through the drug culture. They control the economy as well so it's no surprise that so many families need 2 or more jobs to survive. The vast majority of families only needed 1 breadwinner in the past. The destruction of capitalism is the ultimate goal of marxism as it is required for the final destruction of freedom.
KenMacMillan 2 years ago
What they're doing is a violation of human rights.
KenMacMillan 2 years ago
Jewish bullshit.
ZOGcorp 2 years ago
fuck you red neck christian bible thumping self righteous dumb fucks. this fat fuck is a joke.
7605252327 2 years ago
Wow you make alot of sense.
wilbursdead 2 years ago
eurocentrism, christianity and the patriarchal feudal family aren't foundations of any virtuous society, they're cancers that need to be cut out! death to fascism!
soakchips 2 years ago
Very intelligent and astute man.Freudian techniques applied to marxist theology combined with facist power and jew money to make it all go.
Gunnarsguns 2 years ago
You, sir, have no idea what anarchy means. In true "anarchy", you wouldn't have to destroy all religions. If no "state" is there to require the attendance of, or ban the institutions of religion, then why in an anarchy do they have to be destroyed? It makes no sense, especially if one considers that in anarchy, on will then have the full right to decide to be religious or not.
hulajoe 2 years ago
If you look closely you can just see him get a little boner everytime he says those three magic words"Barack HUSSEIN Obama"
anxresi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what the fuck is this guy talking about? Not all of the founding fathers were christian. That's a lie.And even if Barrack Obama was a muslim (and by the way it's mUslim not mOslim) and not a christian, who cares?In fact I think it's about time we have another athiest president(thats right I said another, do some research and maybe you'll actually learn somethingI think that it seems smart to elect someone who doesn't believe in stupid fucking bronze age myths.
-peace
bilgerat420 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Exactly right. All of the founding fathers were not christian but this guy is just a racist. The "council of conservative citizens" is an extension of the KKK. Good to know right now he's eating a huge shit burger. Lol.
sergeantnorider 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is it really? Why do they always have to us the same letter three times. They should make the Roundtable of Racist Retards. It's more honest.
I hope the next time this guy lights a cross he lights himself on fire instead. I'd be willing to dance around that.
bilgerat420 2 years ago
i know this man ( Mr. Fromm) and he is a great respectable man who is a former teacher who was fired after years of jewish organizations trying to get him fired for having free speech speeches where a few skinheads happeneed to come and he was labled a nazi. If u type in paul fromm on youtube there will b a news show on him where they even said that he treated everyone equally and he left his polititcs at home.
14seamus88 2 years ago
Clean my toilet nigger. Know you're place boy.
jimj122680 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Paranoid much? Someone lock this looney up...
pilkingtonphil 3 years ago
Shut your mouth you kike.
jimj122680 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm a... Jew? But... I'm not Jewish. I don't understand...
Oh right, I just clicked on your profile, now I get it... You're clinically insane, well that clears that up then...
pilkingtonphil 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>WhiteMinority2040>
WhiteMinority2040 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy's a retard.
toybeed 3 years ago
fuck yah, fuck the stormfront
seigneurvoland666 3 years ago
You're an idiot.
There are plenty of properties that our founding fathers had which subsequent presidents did not have. Why should we think the properties you cherry pick are important?
Also, he got almost all of his money from small, individual donations.
NathanZimmerman 3 years ago
I don`t understand, if Marxism is dead, why waste time on it? What do you care/fear?
ElFrankus 3 years ago
It's not dead ;)
Haidoor1987 3 years ago 2
actually whats the name of this song because it is the funniest thing i have ever heard TAKE A LOOK INTO THIS WARRIORS EYEEEEES
plutoohno 3 years ago
this guy hasnt read marx at all.
plutoohno 3 years ago
how one can mention the frankfurt school's analyses and barack obama without massively criticizing his reformist bullshit is beyond me...
which is of course nothing to say about this moronic character's fascism.
rocinante316 3 years ago 6
I'm going to ask again. Does anyone here know what communism is?
you can just wiki it if you're not sure....
mnwike 3 years ago 2
Communism is where most of the population have no choice (that is same car, grey clothes, etc because of no competition in capitalism) and have boring lives watched over by a security service and if you step out of line you go missing. The leaders live beaut lavish lives at the total expense of the population.
nihongo02341 3 years ago
Sorry, that's wrong! Communism is a hypothesized classless and stateless society. What you're talking about is state-centric socialism (sometimes with Marxist inspiration) as it existed historically in several countries. Considering that your definition is quite far from that of Marx who coined the term (and is an attempt to build a straw man), yours has no relevance. Thanks for playing though!
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your nick name is a giveaway! Give it up RED!
nihongo02341 3 years ago
My screenname is a joke and so are you.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
well put.
plutoohno 3 years ago
"Revolutionaries...who wanted to overthrow the...Christian...aristocratic order"
Sounds like the Founding Fathers of the United States to me, since they overthrew the British aristocratic colonial order with its state religion, and then inscribed in the Constitution a secular-oriented freedom of religion and banning of aristocratic titles.
Washington and Jefferson--what a bunch of Marxists!
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
All the commies must be living on anti-commie videos like this, spying them out. Sounds like we need anothr Joe Mcarthy wichhunt and ban these commos from youtube.
the cold war on youtube....... continues because they lost it in the real world.;...
nihongo02341 3 years ago
No, I'm afraid you didn't. No one has ever lived under communism, which is a classless and stateless society that has only been hypothesized and never has been proclaimed by any group or government.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
"No, I'm afraid you didn't. No one has ever lived under communism, which is a classless and stateless society that has only been hypothesized"
Yes that's why it can never exist. It's a theoretical impossibility. It's a contradiction to do economics without private property and a classless society is impossible because people are not naturally equal. Also a stateles society is a contradiction in terms. To sum up Marxism was a really really stupid theory.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
I had a point JohananRaatz; do you have one, or at least one that isn't a meaningless opinionated assertion?
Private property is a concept that evolved over the past few centuries, yet we've had economic activity for millennia. The modern state too is a structure that was created only in the 17th century, why then is "a stateles[sic] society a contradiction in terms"?
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
"I had a point JohananRaatz; do you have one, or at least one that isn't a meaningless opinionated assertion?"
They are not meaningless assertions. I was pointing out that politics and economics require the inclusion of fundamental concepts if we are to make any sense of them.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
"Private property is a concept that evolved over the past few centuries, yet we've had economic activity for millennia."
No private property has been around since the dawn of history. That's why people millenia ago had a concept of "stealing." Frankly I've never heard such a ridiculous statement before.People exchanged items as private property all throughout history. That's why we can unearth coins from the Roman period or learn the history of the barter system of the ancient Egyptians.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
"The modern state too is a structure that was created only in the 17th century, why then is "a stateles[sic] society a contradiction in terms"?"
In it's modern form yes.But a government of one form or another has always existed.If it hasn't escaped your notice a state is a society.Without a government defining the rules or boundaries of a state you can't define that state as any particular society. Rather "societies" would be formless and non-concretizable abstractions(ie they wouldn't exist)
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
Your assertion that society does not exist without the state is patently absurd, and needs only the most superficial brief study of antropology and sociology to be corrected. Your subsequent qualifications notwithstanding, it is a very narrow-minded reading of human society.
As civil society is related to, but distinct from, the state, and as primitive societies (and many small communities) existed without the state, I am not so unimaginative as to declare such a thing an impossibility.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
As civil society is related to, but distinct from, the state, and as primitive societies (and many small communities) existed without the state, I am not so unimaginative as to declare such a thing an impossibility.
OK first of all those small communities had a surrogate for the state. The cheif and the tribal elders in that case were the "state". I'm not meaning "state" in the modern sense. I mean emblem of authority that ties the community together. You can't have a society without one.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
""a stateles[sic] society a contradiction in terms"?"
To sum up saying that a society can exist without a state is akin saying that a building can exist without walls, floors, or a ceiling.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
Gosh, you sure are liberal in your use of comments!
Until the enclosure movement in the UK and similar developments in Europe as feudalism ended, private property as it is conceived today did not exist. The idea of property was even farther from how we today conceive of it in the world outside Europe. The modern legal/economic conception of private property had no meaning to the majority of the world's population until the 19th century.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 3 years ago
Private property in it's modern form may not have existed but some other equivalent category did exist. Feudalism for example had a conception similar to private property. The fiefdom was the "private property" of the feudal lord. And besides that the concept of stealing relies on the concept of private property and people knew what stealing was since the dawn of civilization.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
Should I change my birth name, David, because I'm not Hebrew? - Another ludicrous argument by this guy.
US is culturally a Christian nation, but officially is a secular one. This is such an obvious point. It is pathetic people still dispute it.
deejaykay 3 years ago
Obama is culturally European and if anything is a crypto-atheist.
His father, who had no involvement in his upbring, was only nominally a muslim and his mother was a skeptical anthropology student. His Indonesian stepfather was a disillusioned political radical, not a muslim radical (All this according to his autobio)
If his cannot be culturally european by definition because of his blood, then a foreign adopted child of north american family cannot be - a ludicrous argument.
deejaykay 3 years ago
Get an education you idiot
nihongo02341 3 years ago
Shameful, reactionary rhetoric from a right-wing moron. But then again; what do you expect from a pig but a grunt?!
Fromm's dis-jointed critique of Marx and the Frankfurt School bears NO relevence to his xenophobic, racist propagations of Obama, apart from stoking-up old flames of anti-communist sentiment.
RDMONTZ 3 years ago
So big money and rich politicians are communists now? Why would the elite question a system that has stolen the power away from the people and given it to them?
You don't have to be a materialist to realize that those on the top don't want to give up their power.
Barmyleatherhead 3 years ago 4
Your statement has the stench of stupidity. Obama is a communist just as surely as Hilary "I want to take those profits" Clinton is a hard core communist.
The difference between Communist Clinton and Communist Obama is Communist Obama wants to turn these United States into another Zimbabwe. Communist Clinton just wants to completely ruin the economy with her moronic ignorance of economics.
All three candidates will cripple us with global warming leftist lies.
accemekun 3 years ago
Does anyone here know what communism is?
mnwike 3 years ago 3
This guy is an idiot! Does he have his own compound somewhere?
Rebeccainca 3 years ago
He had a compound, but then a Muslim-commie-feminist undermined his proud European heritage and collectivized it in the name of the female Allah.
comradepinko 3 years ago
Communism will succeed with people like you have no education, no knowledge.
nihongo02341 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ugh. I hate how these Anglophile types try to say how America was founded upon Christianity. I agree the Frankfurt school fucked up society, but I'm not about to use something as shitty as Christianity to prove my point.
D3adGoon 3 years ago
This country was founded on Christianity. Your lack of historical knowledge about the founding of this country is disgusting.
The atheist communist bastards may think they have won, but good ole boys like me have enough guns stashed away to set things right when the time comes.
In the mean time you should read the writings of the founding fathers instead of talking out your ass.
accemekun 3 years ago
There is no such thing as "separation of church and state". The early ACLU took those words from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to a church in Danbury, CT when he was running for President; it is not part of the constitution. Jefferson simply meant there would be no state religion.
jimj122680 3 years ago
Amen. These nutters don't want freedom, they want communism.
nihongo02341 3 years ago
STORMFRONT? STURMFRON????FUCK YOU NAZI-ASSHOLE! These stupid kid has no idea liberty, equality, socialism.
Smash Faschism! Long live democracy!
red greets out of austria!
nonameposter 4 years ago
"Smash Faschism! Long live democracy!"
Fascism Smascism. Does anyone even know what the heck fascism is? I've yet to run across a coherent definition of fascism that doesn't at the same time encompass most every society in human history.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
there have been different definitions, look it up in wikipedia.
@marxism It seems to me, you did not understand it. Marxens has analysed the actual society, but has not really worked out an alternative. Marx has shown that there are classes in capitalism (the ones who have the means of productions/the ones that dont). Marx has never really concentrated on the "state" (because no progress was possible with that instrument of the rich in 1848) Equality Liberty are just values, we should defend
nonameposter 3 years ago
"you did not understand it. Marxens has analysed the actual society, but has not really worked out an alternative."
Well a lot of them try and they tend to create bad alternatives.
"no progress was possible with that instrument of the rich"
The problem with Marxism is that it doesn't realize that progress can be shared between classes. Progress is not about class warfare.
"Equality Liberty are just values"
Trouble is most Marxists pit the two values against each other.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
"The problem with Marxism is that it doesn't realize that progress can be shared between classes."
That is not true. Marx has never said that, nor did his followers.
One problem: every sicko that wants to take money from the rich is called "marxist" today. but marxens ideas cant be made responisble for what everybody does and says. a bit less emotion and a bit more sientific accouracy wouldnt be a bad idea
nonameposter 3 years ago
"but marxens ideas cant be made responisble for what everybody does and says."
Look I only say this because most self-described marxists I know (I mean personally know) advocate the redistribution of private property
"a bit less emotion and a bit more sientific accouracy wouldnt be a bad idea"
Yes although I have know critical theorists and to base their arguments on emotion albeit in a cryptic fashion.
JohananRaatz 3 years ago
This is nothing more than a racist diatribe. He uses the term european instead of the word white, like no one will understand his true meaning. This guy is a bad joke.
powerone1 4 years ago
claiming that high political office should be reserved for white christian men is racist. 'culture war' types like this guy love to reminisce about a make-believe past when america was competely white and christian. but they're mistaken. the u.s. has always been multicultural. the romanticized past he's speaking of was simply a time when these sorts of racist ideologies were more widely accepted.
the substance of his argument is not much different from the ideas of hitler.
criticaljunkie 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice tie. Giant douche bag.
drumsticknic 4 years ago
it's cool to watch fox news without all the flashy graphics and rugged boyish good looks of hannity!
BillBillard 4 years ago
Google "Freedom's Enemies, Barack Hussein Obama" by Beckwith.
Huge on-going file with links to back up inforation. Learn the truth
cyberella 4 years ago
the guy makes some good points , but he's affiliated with StormFront an organization with some very fanatic people of the neo-nazi persuasion.
napalmcoffee 4 years ago
"1.The music of the United States is essentially european"
Ironic, considering people all over Europe listen to the music of African-Americans.
2."...not a denominational country, but a christian country"
Ironic, considering that 42 of 43 presidents have been protestant, while only 1 has been catholic, the largest christian denomination in the world.
electricrussell 4 years ago
this song is so lame
RyanLVMetal88 4 years ago
I loved getting to hear this talk in person when you came to North Carolina. Keep fighting and giving them all hell!
MRCSA4LIFE 4 years ago
I've suspected that the big hollywood Jews who months ago supported Obama, did so to put pressure on Clinton in order to extract promises concerning Israel, and the war for terror, among other things.
jedberten 4 years ago
Excellent Paul! Very insightful and enlightening.
ShawnCastle 4 years ago 2